[Bug 851136] [NEW] Radiance slider asset would look better dark
Public bug reported: At the moment the slider used in the Radiance theme, visible in e.g. the Sound Indicator, has got a light pixmap. The light grey colour of the slider against the default background colour of Radiance doesn't look to pretty in my eyes. I would suggest to give the it the same tone of black that is also used for the monochrome icons in the notification are and the play/pause buttons in the sound menu. This would make the slider look better against the light background and would create a more harmonic view. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: light-themes 0.1.8.24 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-11.18-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-11-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Sep 15 19:56:09 2011 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl:en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: light-themes UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-07-04 (73 days ago) ** Affects: light-themes (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/851136 Title: Radiance slider asset would look better dark To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/851136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 851136] Re: Radiance slider asset would look better dark
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/851136 Title: Radiance slider asset would look better dark To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/851136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810111] Re: Support for certain Ralink RT5390 driver not included
I can confirm that this issue is still present in Ubuntu Oneiric. I have to manually compile the kernel module every time there is a kernel update. The laptop I'm talking about is the Asus K73SV-TY080V. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810111 Title: Support for certain Ralink RT5390 driver not included To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/810111/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 838337] [NEW] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000010041
Public bug reported: While running 'Check for updates' in Update Manager, this crash warning from Apport appeared. ProblemType: KernelOops DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: linux-image-3.0.0-9-generic 3.0.0-9.15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-9.15-generic 3.0.3 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-9-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: qense 1876 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC1: qense 1876 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] Bestand of map bestaat niet Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'NVidia'/'HDA NVidia at 0xf9e78000 irq 21' Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC883' Components : 'HDA:10ec0883,1043829f,0012' Controls : 36 Simple ctrls : 21 Card1.Amixer.info: Card hw:1 'CODEC'/'Burr-Brown from TI USB Audio CODEC at usb-:00:02.0-2, full speed' Mixer name : 'USB Mixer' Components : 'USB08bb:2904' Controls : 2 Simple ctrls : 1 Date: Wed Aug 31 21:49:04 2011 Failure: oops HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=dc3e8016-2dd4-4be6-86bd-c59772543c1c MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-9-generic root=UUID=6bd4eace-488a-499e-a79c-ee7e11ce089e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 PulseSinks: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list-sinks'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. PulseSources: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list-sources'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. RelatedPackageVersions: kerneloops-daemon 0.12+git20090217-1ubuntu14 RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00010041 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-07-04 (58 days ago) WpaSupplicantLog: dmi.bios.date: 08/06/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0415 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: M3N78-EH dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0415:bd08/06/2008:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnM3N78-EH:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: amd64 apport-kerneloops kernel-oops oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838337 Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00010041 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/838337/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 838337] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000010041
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838337 Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00010041 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/838337/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 807433] Re: package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b23~pre2-0ubuntu2 [modified: usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/rt.jar] failed to install/upgrade: subproces dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile gaf een foutwaarde
Issue went away. ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807433 Title: package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b23~pre2-0ubuntu2 [modified: usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/rt.jar] failed to install/upgrade: subproces dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile gaf een foutwaarde 2 terug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/807433/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 807433] [NEW] package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b23~pre2-0ubuntu2 [modified: usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/rt.jar] failed to install/upgrade: subproces dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile gaf een foutwaar
Public bug reported: Error during updating. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b23~pre2-0ubuntu2 [modified: usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/rt.jar] ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0-3.4-generic 3.0.0-rc5 Uname: Linux 3.0-3-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jul 8 11:40:48 2011 ErrorMessage: subproces dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile gaf een foutwaarde 2 terug SourcePackage: openjdk-6 Title: package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b23~pre2-0ubuntu2 [modified: usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/rt.jar] failed to install/upgrade: subproces dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile gaf een foutwaarde 2 terug UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-07-04 (3 days ago) ** Affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package oneiric unity-2d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807433 Title: package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b23~pre2-0ubuntu2 [modified: usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/rt.jar] failed to install/upgrade: subproces dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile gaf een foutwaarde 2 terug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/807433/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 807433] Re: package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b23~pre2-0ubuntu2 [modified: usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/rt.jar] failed to install/upgrade: subproces dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile gaf een foutwaarde
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807433 Title: package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b23~pre2-0ubuntu2 [modified: usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/rt.jar] failed to install/upgrade: subproces dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile gaf een foutwaarde 2 terug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/807433/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 805879] [NEW] Behaviour of window controls of parent window with modal dialogue confusing
Public bug reported: The fact that the window controls of maximised applications are incorporated into the top panel in Unity causes confusing behaviour for applications with modal dialogues. Say, you are saving something in Gedit. When the modal save dialogue is open and gedit is not maximised, you can still press the maximise button. Gedit will then expand to fill the whole screen and move its title bar completely to the top panel. The animation used for this implies that the window controls will have moved to the top left corner. This feeling is strengthened by the fact that the modal dialogue has its own window controls on its own, non-maximied window borders. However, when you try to unmaximise the gedit window by going to the top left corner of the Unity top panel, you will discover that there are no window controls there. The window controls, which the user might think were just moved, have disappeared altogether! This could be caused by the fact that the modal dialogue has the focus and that the panel therefore displays the stuff that belongs to the modal dialogue. But I think that this works confusing, since a user should reasonably expect that the window controls of the main window were moved to the top panel, as the animation suggests. Normally what the animation implies is true, because you will switch focus away from the currently active window to the window you are maximising. When you return to the other window, you will have done an action and that is enough to realise that the top panel changed. However, when an application has a modal dialogue, its parent window cannot receive focus, even when you press the maximise button on the parent, its modal child dialogue will keep the focus. This is what causes the confusion. I suggest to make the top panel always display the window controls and menu of the parent in the case a non-maximised modal dialogue is present. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: unity 4.2.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0-3.4-generic 3.0.0-rc5 Uname: Linux 3.0-3-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,grid,resize,compiztoolbox,move,place,gnomecompat,mousepoll,vpswitch,regex,snap,wall,session,animation,expo,ezoom,workarounds,staticswitcher,fade,scale,unityshell] Date: Tue Jul 5 12:18:50 2011 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl:en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-07-04 (0 days ago) ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric running-unity unity-2d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805879 Title: Behaviour of window controls of parent window with modal dialogue confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/805879/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 805879] Re: Behaviour of window controls of parent window with modal dialogue confusing
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805879 Title: Behaviour of window controls of parent window with modal dialogue confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/805879/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 789596] Re: Canonical doesn't provide updates is a scary message, especially for customers
I think that a positive formulation of the sentence would be best. It should name only those who are accountable, not parties that are not. If Canonical or MOTUs are not involved, don't name them. People might skip over the little word 'not'. Updates for SOFTWARE are provided by VENDOR does seem the best solution for third-party apps to me. I would name the vendor explicitly, so interested managers can check the company's track record without having to look somewhere else on the overview page. For the community maintained packages something like SOFTWARE is made available in Ubuntu by the community. Updates may or may not be provided. The case of PPAs or unknown third-party repositories is a bit difficult, since you may have overlap with earlier versions in official repositories and you cannot easily refer to the name of the repository. However, we can say that Google's official Chrome repository or that of Dropbox are more thrustworthy than myfunrepo.example.com/ubuntu would be. It would be good to say Updates for Google Chrome are (may be?) provided by Google. That's a reasonable statement. However, for myfunrepo.example.com/ubuntu I'd say something like SOFTWARE is made available for Ubuntu by a third-party. Updates may be made available. Furthermore, Canonical will provide updates for Empathy Internet Messaging after October 2012, but in a different release of Ubuntu. Shouldn't that be reflected in the string as well, or would that be too much information? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789596 Title: Canonical doesn't provide updates is a scary message, especially for customers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/789596/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 789596] [NEW] Canonical doesn't provide updates is a scary message, especially for customers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center In the overview of software in Software Centre that does not come from the officially supported archives, a warning text is shown informing the user that this particular piece of software is not supported by Canonical, but that updates MAY be delivered by the community/a third- party. It is not only shown for software from community-maintained archvies or for PPAs, but also for software that is on sale. Although this message is factually correct, it is a scary message. Users might get the impression that by default no updates should be expected, but if you are lucky something might be done. Especially for paid applications, this might not be very encouraging towards users. I would suggest to change the warning from a negative formulation to a positive: updates for this software are provided by X. Not Canonical, etc. Furthermore, this message is also shown for packages from the Canonical Partner archive--which is maintained by Canonical, AFAI. Is that desired behaviour? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: software-center 4.0.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-9.43-generic 2.6.38.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-9-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat May 28 18:13:11 2011 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl:en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: software-center UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2010-11-13 (195 days ago) ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789596 Title: Canonical doesn't provide updates is a scary message, especially for customers -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 789596] Re: Canonical doesn't provide updates is a scary message, especially for customers
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789596 Title: Canonical doesn't provide updates is a scary message, especially for customers -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 753853] Re: [natty] The disc drive for / is not ready yet or not present
I can confirm that the latest update for udev on Natty has left the system in an unbootable state. I can confirm that the four processes from udev die as listed in the bug's description. This seems to be a pretty critical bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753853 Title: [natty] The disc drive for / is not ready yet or not present -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 753891] Re: package branding-ubuntu 0.5 failed to install/upgrade: a tentar sobre-escrever '/usr/share/gnome-games/quadrapassel/pixmaps/quadrapassel.svg', que também está no pacote quadrapassel 1
This crash occurred today on Ubuntu Natty after the update of this package to 0.6, resulting in bug #753853 and bug #741370. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753891 Title: package branding-ubuntu 0.5 failed to install/upgrade: a tentar sobre- escrever '/usr/share/gnome- games/quadrapassel/pixmaps/quadrapassel.svg', que também está no pacote quadrapassel 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu3 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 753853] Re: [natty] The disc drive for / is not ready yet or not present
It seems that this is caused by the fact that branding-ubuntu failed to update to 0.6 today, crashing aptd and interrupting the udev update process. Running dpkg --configure -a using chroot fixed the problem for me. All thanks to the great Stéphane Graber. Thank you for your help! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753853 Title: [natty] The disc drive for / is not ready yet or not present -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 741370] Re: aptd crashed with OSError in _copy_io_master(): [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor
This crash occurred again today when branding-update failed to update to 0.6. It interrupted the udev update, making it divert, preventing update-initramfs to run and causing the system to become unbootable. Finishing dpkg --configure -a using chroot solved that. Udev issue reported in bug #753853 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741370 Title: aptd crashed with OSError in _copy_io_master(): [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 753449] Re: package branding-ubuntu 0.5 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gnome-games/quadrapassel/pixmaps/quadrapassel.svg', which is also in package quadrapassel 1:2.32
This bug had quite some consequences for some people, causing bugs #753853 and #741370, making the system unbootable until dpkg --configure -a was run in a chroot to finish the configuration of udev and the new kernel. The update process of both was interrupted when aptd crashed as a result of this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753449 Title: package branding-ubuntu 0.5 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/gnome- games/quadrapassel/pixmaps/quadrapassel.svg', which is also in package quadrapassel 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu3 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 749586] Re: bzr-notify crashed with ImportError in __main__: cannot import name open_display
Nothing sensitive here, marking this as public. ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749586 Title: bzr-notify crashed with ImportError in __main__: cannot import name open_display -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 716258] Re: Notify OSD appears on each virtual desktop in workspace switcher
** Summary changed: - Notify OSD appears on each virtual desktop in overlay + Notify OSD appears on each virtual desktop in workspace switcher ** Also affects: notify-osd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: - If I get a notification, and then go to the four desktop overlay from - the panel in natty, the notifcation will appear on each desktop - unreadable. This isn't usable at all whatsover, I think it should be - full size and only in one position regardless if the four desktop - overlay is open. + If I get a notification, and then go to the workspace switcher from the + panel in natty, the notification bubble will appear on each desktop + unreadable. This isn't usable at all whatsover, I think it should be in + the default position at the top right corner of the screen, even when + the workspace switcher is active. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/716258 Title: Notify OSD appears on each virtual desktop in workspace switcher -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 745983] Re: Closing a Nautilus window crashes the whole file manager
Thank you for helping with making Ubuntu better by reporting this as a paper cut. However, the One Hundred Paper Cuts project is for small usability issues that are trivial to fix. From your description, especially the refreshing desktop part, it seems that Nautilus doesn't wrongly close all windows when you try to close one, but crashes completely and then restarts. Therefore this is a regular bug and I am declining this for the One Hundred Paper Cuts project. I am leaving the Nautilus task open, because this is a valid bug. Other bug triagers will process this bug further. ** Summary changed: - Pressing X on a nautilus window, quits all nautilus windows (and refreshes the desktop) + Closing a Nautilus window crashes the whole file manager ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745983 Title: Closing a Nautilus window crashes the whole file manager -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 747760] [NEW] Ubufox shows up in Software Center under Firefox add-ons
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubufox The 'ubufox' packages shows up under Firefox add-ons in Software Center, even though it is a transitional package for xul-ext-ubufox, which also shows up in the add-ons list. Ubufox has no use and a user might be confused when nothing happens after he or she installes it. What makes it even more prone to user confusion is that 'ubufox' has a little Ubuntu icon, whereas 'xul-ext- ubufox', the actual extension, has the default icon. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: ubufox (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Apr 1 22:24:56 2011 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=fy:nl:en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=fy_NL.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubufox UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2010-11-13 (139 days ago) ** Affects: ubufox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747760 Title: Ubufox shows up in Software Center under Firefox add-ons -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 608219] Re: Submenus not added when done so with Glade
Deluge added its own indicator meanwhile, and that is using the unedited tray_menu from the GtkStatusIcon. However, the submenus are not displayed at all here, so this seems to be an issue still. They are using Glade, maybe that worsens the situation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608219 Title: Submenus not added when done so with Glade -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 608219] Re: Submenus not added when done so with Glade
(The GTK+ patch is not used anymore. I'm not sure what is using it, but since Deluge isn't, it seems to me it can be removed again, unless someone sees a use case for it.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608219 Title: Submenus not added when done so with Glade -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 721473] Re: Unity 2D should not show up in Software Centre
Whoops, I'll have to take my words about stability back then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721473 Title: Unity 2D should not show up in Software Centre -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 721473] Re: Unity 2D should not show up in Software Centre
I think we shouldn't ask users to search for Unity 2D themselves if they need it. Although a selection of the users might understand it, others will be confused and put off. We should instead offer the option of installing Unity 2D when no 3D support is detected. However, as far as I'm aware, Unity 2D is not expected to be stable enough for the 11.04 release, and it will only be used as the default fallback in 11.10. That is another argument in favour of hiding it in the Software Centre. We shouldn't expose something that isn't considered stable in the 'app store', especially when it is not an 'app'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721473 Title: Unity 2D should not show up in Software Centre -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666852] Re: Packard Bell EasyNote MZ35 freezes when AC unplugged and wireless on
I can confirm that the freeze still occurs on Ubuntu 11.04 alpha. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666852 Title: Packard Bell EasyNote MZ35 freezes when AC unplugged and wireless on -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 721473] [NEW] Unity 2D should not show up in Software Centre
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity-2d Unity 2D shows up in the Software Centre. Currently it is listed under New Applications. However, it is not something you should show regular users, as they might install it. They will not notice any changes to their system when they install it, if Unity 2D is suppressed when 3D functionality is available. This, and the presence of Unity alone in the Software Centre's visible catalogue could cause user confusion. Unity 2D should be hidden. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: unity-2d (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-4.31-generic 2.6.38-rc5 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-4-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Feb 18 20:22:51 2011 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: unity-2d ** Affects: unity-2d (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721473 Title: Unity 2D should not show up in Software Centre -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 714280] Re: The error was 'BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length erro'.
I can confirm that since the latest update Emerillon is working now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714280 Title: The error was 'BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length erro'. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 714280] Re: The error was 'BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length erro'.
I can confirm that the behaviour of Emerillon has not changed after these fixes are applied and X is restarted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714280 Title: The error was 'BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length erro'. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 714280] Re: The error was 'BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length erro'.
Not sure if this is driver-related, but I am using the Nouveau driver for my Nvidia Geforce 9600GT, with the experimental Mesa DRI2 driver installed. I am not running Unity, because Compiz currently crashes with the Nouveau DRI2 Gallium3D driver—not sure about the naming here. ;) The crash should be very easy to reproduce: on an up-to-date installation of Natty, install Emerillon, run it and see it never starts. Launching it from a terminal will reveal it crashes immediately. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714280 Title: The error was 'BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length erro'. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 718183] [NEW] Emerillon crashes on launch
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: emerillon On Ubuntu Natty the map viewer Emerillon crashes right away, writing the following output to the terminal: The program 'emerillon' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length erro'. (Details: serial 181 error_code 16 request_code 155 minor_code 17) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) Running Emerillon with the '--sync' command line option does not change the application's behaviour nor its output. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: emerillon 0.1.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-3.30-generic 2.6.38-rc4 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-3-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Feb 13 15:50:00 2011 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: emerillon ** Affects: emerillon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/718183 Title: Emerillon crashes on launch -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 718183] Re: Emerillon crashes on launch
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/718183 Title: Emerillon crashes on launch -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717743] Re: Gwibber's menu does not show up on classic GNOME Panel desktop
Marking this bug as Invalid since it was caused by 'unity-panel-service' continuing to run in the background. ** Changed in: gwibber (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717743 Title: Gwibber's menu does not show up on classic GNOME Panel desktop -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717631] Re: XChat GNOME menu bar doesn't show up in classic GNOME
Marking this bug as Invalid since it was caused by 'unity-panel-service' continuing to run in the background. ** Changed in: xchat-gnome (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717631 Title: XChat GNOME menu bar doesn't show up in classic GNOME -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717631] [NEW] XChat GNOME menu bar doesn't show up in classic GNOME
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xchat-gnome When you run XChat GNOME in the regular GNOME 2.x desktop, with the panel and Metacity, its menu doesn't show. You have to explicitly run it with the command 'UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=false xchat-gnome' in order to make it show its menu. The menu does not show up in the Indicator Appmenu widget on the GNOME Panel either. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: xchat-gnome 1:0.26.1+git20101206.557c940-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-3.30-generic 2.6.38-rc4 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-3-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Feb 12 11:13:04 2011 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xchat-gnome ** Affects: xchat-gnome (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 app-menu apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717631 Title: XChat GNOME menu bar doesn't show up in classic GNOME -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717631] Re: XChat GNOME menu bar doesn't show up in classic GNOME
** Tags added: app-menu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717631 Title: XChat GNOME menu bar doesn't show up in classic GNOME -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717743] [NEW] Gwibber's menu does not show up on classic GNOME Panel desktop
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gwibber When running Gwibber on the classic Natty desktop, with GNOME Panel and Metacity, instead of Unity and Compiz, the menu does not show up. You have to explicitily run 'UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=false gwibber' in order to launch the application with its menu visible. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gwibber 2.91.2-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-3.30-generic 2.6.38-rc4 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-3-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Feb 12 15:47:22 2011 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash RelatedPackageVersions: desktopcouch 1.0.6-0ubuntu1 gnome-keyring 2.92.92.is.2.32.1-0ubuntu2 SourcePackage: gwibber ** Affects: gwibber (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717743 Title: Gwibber's menu does not show up on classic GNOME Panel desktop -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717743] Re: Gwibber's menu does not show up on classic GNOME Panel desktop
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717743 Title: Gwibber's menu does not show up on classic GNOME Panel desktop -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717752] [NEW] Gwibber refuses to relinquish focus in Natty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gwibber When Gwibber is having the focus, the only way to give focus to another application is by first minimalising Gwibber itself. When you press on another application to focus that while Gwibber is still having the focus, its window list entry will start flashing, like Update Manager asks for attention when it's busy, but it will not show. You will have to explicitly minimise Gwibber first before you can see other applications. I can confirm this on a desktop running Metacity and GNOME Panel, and on a desktop running Compiz and Unity. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gwibber 2.91.2-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-3.30-generic 2.6.38-rc4 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-3-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Feb 12 16:02:27 2011 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash RelatedPackageVersions: desktopcouch 1.0.6-0ubuntu1 gnome-keyring 2.92.92.is.2.32.1-0ubuntu2 SourcePackage: gwibber ** Affects: gwibber (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717752 Title: Gwibber refuses to relinquish focus in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717752] Re: Gwibber refuses to relinquish focus in Natty
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717752 Title: Gwibber refuses to relinquish focus in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717754] [NEW] Jockey proceeds to uninstall 'ubuntu-desktop' and X server in Natty
Public bug reported: Currently the proprietary Nvidia driver in Ubuntu Natty does not work with the X server. Therefore, both packages conflict with each other. Installing 'nvidia-current', or any other Nvidia driver, will remove the X server and with that also 'ubuntu-desktop'. Install the X server, and therefore also 'ubuntu-desktop', will uninstall any proprietary Nvidia driver still present on the desktop. At the moment the proprietary Nvidia drivers are still visible in Jockey. You can install them, and Jockey will proceed to install the 'nvidia-current' or 'nvidia-173' package, depending on your choice. Jockey will even do this when it requires the removal of the X server and 'ubuntu-desktop'. I think that Jockey should refuse to install any driver when it leads to the removal of 'ubuntu-desktop' or such a key element of the desktop as the X server. It should warn the user that it is impossible to proceed and abort. Currently there is a risk that users break their own system and end up without a graphical shell. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: jockey-gtk 0.9-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-3.30-generic 2.6.38-rc4 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-3-generic x86_64 .var.log.jockey.log: Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Feb 12 16:06:45 2011 MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-3-generic root=UUID=6bd4eace-488a-499e-a79c-ee7e11ce089e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: jockey dmi.bios.date: 08/06/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0415 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: M3N78-EH dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0415:bd08/06/2008:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnM3N78-EH:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer ** Affects: jockey (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717754 Title: Jockey proceeds to uninstall 'ubuntu-desktop' and X server in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717754] Re: Jockey proceeds to uninstall 'ubuntu-desktop' and X server in Natty
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717754 Title: Jockey proceeds to uninstall 'ubuntu-desktop' and X server in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717164] Re: Compiz crashes with experimental Nouveau DRI 3D support
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 710588 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710588 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717164 Title: Compiz crashes with experimental Nouveau DRI 3D support -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717164] [NEW] Compiz crashes with experimental Nouveau DRI 3D support
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 710588 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710588 Public bug reported: I enabled Experimental 3D support for NVIDIA cards from Jockey, which installed the library 'libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental'. This does make the Nouveau driver pass the 3D support test, but Compiz segfaults when it tries to start itself. The relevant line from the terminal output seems to be: compiz: nv50_pc_emit.c:863: emit_flop: Controletest 'STYPE(i, 0) == 0x09' faalt. 'Controletest' is 'Control test', 'faalt' means 'fails'. My graphics card has an Nvidia Geforce 9600GT chip. Natty is up-to-date. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental 7.10-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-3.30-generic 2.6.38-rc4 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-3-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,mousepoll,vpswitch,regex,animation,snap,expo,move,compiztoolbox,place,gnomecompat,wall,ezoom,workarounds,staticswitcher,resize,fade,scale,session,unityshell] CompositorRunning: None Date: Fri Feb 11 15:40:18 2011 DistUpgraded: Yes, recently upgraded Log time: 2010-11-13 17:25:16.723895 DistroCodename: natty DistroVariant: ubuntu GraphicsCard: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82f2] MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-3-generic root=UUID=6bd4eace-488a-499e-a79c-ee7e11ce089e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 Renderer: Hardware acceleration SourcePackage: mesa dmi.bios.date: 08/06/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0415 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: M3N78-EH dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0415:bd08/06/2008:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnM3N78-EH:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.2.1+glibmainloop4-0ubuntu11 version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.23-1ubuntu3 version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10-1ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6~3ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.13.2+git20110124.fadee040-0ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-1ubuntu6 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20110107+b795ca6e-0ubuntu4 ** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717164 Title: Compiz crashes with experimental Nouveau DRI 3D support -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717164] Re: Compiz crashes with experimental Nouveau DRI 3D support
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 710588 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710588 Attached is the output from running 'compiz --replace' in a terminal. ** Attachment added: compiz--replace.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/717164/+attachment/1843408/+files/compiz--replace.txt ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 710588 compiz assert failure: compiz: nv50_pc_emit.c:863: emit_flop: Assertion `STYPE(i, 0) == 0x09' failed. * You can subscribe to bug 710588 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/710588/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717164 Title: Compiz crashes with experimental Nouveau DRI 3D support -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 710588] Re: compiz assert failure: compiz: nv50_pc_emit.c:863: emit_flop: Assertion `STYPE(i, 0) == 0x09' failed.
I can confirm this bug on an up-to-date installation of natty—I just marked my own bug #717164 a duplicate of this—with a PCI-E Nvidia Geforce 9600GT (the Asus EN9600GT). The assertion error is exactly the same for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710588 Title: compiz assert failure: compiz: nv50_pc_emit.c:863: emit_flop: Assertion `STYPE(i, 0) == 0x09' failed. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 710588] Re: compiz assert failure: compiz: nv50_pc_emit.c:863: emit_flop: Assertion `STYPE(i, 0) == 0x09' failed.
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #34179 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34179 ** Changed in: nouveau Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: nouveau Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: nouveau Remote watch: None = freedesktop.org Bugzilla #34179 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710588 Title: compiz assert failure: compiz: nv50_pc_emit.c:863: emit_flop: Assertion `STYPE(i, 0) == 0x09' failed. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 707606] [NEW] GtkMenus doen't show on Glade's canvas in Natty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: glade-3 In Ubuntu 11.04 alpha, natty, a GtkMenu won't show up on Glade's canvas when running it in Unity. I suspect that the adaptations made to Gtk+ cause the GtkMenu to be hidden in the Glade interface designer as well. This makes the menu not show up anywhere. I think that we ought to make the menu show in the interface editor, so you can edit it. You cannot edit the menu if it is not there. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: glade 3.7.3-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-12.26-generic 2.6.37 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-12-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jan 25 21:05:15 2011 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: glade-3 ** Affects: glade-3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707606 Title: GtkMenus doen't show on Glade's canvas in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 707606] Re: GtkMenus doen't show on Glade's canvas in Natty
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707606 Title: GtkMenus doen't show on Glade's canvas in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 704997] [NEW] Unity work-space switcher icon looks like an application
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity The work-space switcher icon on the Unity launcher has the same appearance as application icons. This makes it look like it is an application and might lead users to expect it to behave like that. It is not obvious that this is not a regular application icon, but something else. I suggest to change the icon to reflect this. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: unity 3.2.12-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-12.26-generic 2.6.37 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-12-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia .proc.driver.nvidia.version: NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 260.19.29 Wed Dec 8 12:08:56 PST 2010 GCC version: gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-1ubuntu2) Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/allscreens/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: compiz Date: Wed Jan 19 17:17:10 2011 DistUpgraded: Yes, recently upgraded Log time: 2010-11-13 17:25:16.723895 DistroCodename: natty DistroVariant: ubuntu GraphicsCard: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82f2] MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.37-12-generic root=UUID=6bd4eace-488a-499e-a79c-ee7e11ce089e ro vt.handoff=7 quiet splash ProcVersionSignature_: Ubuntu 2.6.37-12.26-generic 2.6.37 Renderer: Hardware acceleration SourcePackage: unity UnitySupportTest: dmi.bios.date: 08/06/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0415 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: M3N78-EH dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0415:bd08/06/2008:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnM3N78-EH:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.22-2ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.9+repack-1ubuntu6 version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.5+6ubuntu7 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.13.2-1ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.901-2ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20100805+b96170a-0ubuntu1 ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704997 Title: Unity work-space switcher icon looks like an application -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 704997] Re: Unity work-space switcher icon looks like an application
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704997 Title: Unity work-space switcher icon looks like an application -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 704392] [NEW] Make Ubuntu's default settings the fallback of GNOME Settings Daemon
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-settings-daemon When GNOME Settings Daemon crashes, the system reverts to some baked-in defaults. The icons and settings used are not Ubuntu's default settings, and don't look too pretty. It would be better, I feel, if the baked-in defaults would be Ubuntu's defaults, so that when the settings daemon crashes, your system still looks like Ubuntu and not like GNOME 2.0. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gnome-settings-daemon 2.32.1-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-12.26-generic 2.6.37 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-12-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jan 18 13:30:19 2011 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-settings-daemon ** Affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704392 Title: Make Ubuntu's default settings the fallback of GNOME Settings Daemon -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 704392] Re: Make Ubuntu's default settings the fallback of GNOME Settings Daemon
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704392 Title: Make Ubuntu's default settings the fallback of GNOME Settings Daemon -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 704392] Re: Make Ubuntu's default settings the fallback of GNOME Settings Daemon
Not resetting at all probably would be the best option, but it could be that the reset happens due to the nature of the GSettings system. When settings are updated, they are immediately changed in applications that use them as well, right? Maybe the reset is presented to applications like regular value changes, so the applications just update their views. In case GNOME Settings Daemon doesn't start right from the beginning, at the start of a new session, I think it would be good to adjust the fall- back values anyway, though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704392 Title: Make Ubuntu's default settings the fallback of GNOME Settings Daemon -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694184] Re: bzr crashed with TypeError in readheaders() with Python 2.7
Thank you for helping with making Ubuntu and Bazaar better by taking the time to report this bug. I can confirm this bug myself. I'm marking the bug as public because I couldn't find any private data in the log files. I'm marking this bug as Triaged because I've opened an upstream task for the developers to deal with it. I'm setting the importance to Medium because this bug severely limits the usability of a non-core application on Ubuntu. ** Summary changed: - bzr crashed with TypeError in readheaders() + bzr crashed with TypeError in readheaders() with Python 2.7 ** Also affects: bzr Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Visibility changed to: Public ** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Tags added: metabug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694184 Title: bzr crashed with TypeError in readheaders() with Python 2.7 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 681872] Re: Greek, Modern (1453-) name contains distracting detail
The upstream maintainer writes the following:
Quoting Sense Hofstede (se...@ubuntu.com):
From Matthew Paul Thomas:
The Debian maintainers are correct about the ISO639-2 names. But those
names are not for selecting languages, they are for classifying
languages. A simple way to demonstrate this is to imagine if someone was
to translate Debian or Ubuntu into the Blackfoot language, and someone
else was to translate it into the Malecite-Passamaquoddy language.
Following ISO639-2 to the letter would require them both to be listed as
Algonquian languages, which would be nonsense, because they're
mutually unintelligible languages. Algonquian languages is a useful
classification, but it's a useless identifier.
ISO 639-3 is meant for this. Malecite-Passamaquoddy has the pqm
code. No idea about the code for Blackfoot as I can't find it in the
standard (it may be listed with another name).
ISO-639-2 is known to be less precise than -3. This is why people who
create locales use -3 codes. And people who want to display a complete
list of languages should use it, too (good luck with 7704 entries).
I would be surprised if there is any software in Ubuntu *or* in Debian
that uses iso-codes for classifying languages, rather than for offering
language choices. So if iso-codes sticks exactly to ISO639-2, then it is
not fit for the purpose of offering language choices, and there needs to
be a language-codes package or something to override or replace it.
Just do it.
And be prepared to deal with request with ${random_developer} who will
try to teach you that this language should be named this way
without, of course, no reference for properly and neutrallmy deal with
this.
This is why iso-codes is stuck to the standard and, as long as I'll be
one of its maintainers, will continue to be.
A much simpler solution, though, would be to recognize that the ISO639-2
list is also internally inconsistent. For example, it has items for
English, Old (ca.450-1100) and English, Middle (1100-1500) -- but it
doesn't have English, Modern (1500-), it just has English. Greek
should be treated the same way.
The equivalent bug in Launchpad Translations was [Launchpad] bug 81158,
fixed in 2007.
Whether Rosetta maintainers want to play the game of renaming
languages is their problem. That's not a reason for us to do so in
iso-codes. And, well, taking Rosetta as reference when it comes at
i18n is not really convincing for me, I'm afraid.
So, sorry, for being harsh, but if someone feels that
Greek, Modern (1453-) is awkward, then get the standard fixed, but
do not twist packages implementing the standard.
An option could be introducing common_name as we did for ISO-3166
because of the Taiwan issue (and later Macedonia issue). That may
happenafter the release of squeeze.
I remember seeing Greek being referenced to in a recent iso-codes
related changelog. Was this fixed in Ubuntu using a patch already?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681872
Title:
Greek, Modern (1453-) name contains distracting detail
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 685577] Re: Launcher gets in the way when trying to close maximized windows.
We do need to take care to prevent issues with window button dancing making it harder to quickly press the button you want. Currently, when the Unity launcher is set to autohide, most open windows will have their window control buttons in an area that will be covered by an expanding launcher. I'm afraid that this will not be solved by moving only maximised windows' controls to the panel. There will be the non-maximised windows left with their controls in their window border. Often, their corner is placed in an upper corner of the screen. We often see non-maximised windows which are only a tad bit smaller than maximised windows, which means they suffer from the exact same problem as maximised windows. When the controls of maximised windows will be moved to the panel, they will move somewhat to the right of the screen. When we will leave the non-maximised windows' controls at their original position they will be further to the left than the controls of maximised windows. This seems to be an undesirable situation to me. It could be worth considering moving all window controls to the panel, but I'm not sure if that would be the way to go, because already I find that it is not always clear that the window controls of maximised applications that are placed in the *panel* belong to the changeable window below the screen element that is always there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685577 Title: Launcher gets in the way when trying to close maximized windows. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 685577] Re: Launcher gets in the way when trying to close maximized windows.
By the way, please do not change the status of bugs without leaving a comment explaining your action. If you need more information about the meaning of the different statuses, please take a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status. Thanks! ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685577 Title: Launcher gets in the way when trying to close maximized windows. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 669666] Re: Ubuntu One 'ticks' are inconsistent
Thank you for helping with making Ubuntu and Ubuntu One better by reporting this bug. I can confirm this bug on an up-to-date version of Ubuntu Natty. Please find attached a screenshot showing the situation. I am accepting this as a paper cut because this is a small issue in a default application of Ubuntu that makes certain folders looks bad. Because it doesn't affect usability too much I am setting the status to Low. I'm also marking this as Triaged for the Ubuntu One package once I've opened an upstream task, because then this bug is fully triaged. I'm using the same priority for the same reasons. ** Attachment added: Schermafdruk.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/669666/+attachment/1747759/+files/Schermafdruk.png ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Milestone: None = nt4-nautilus ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Assignee: (unassigned) = Papercuts Ninja (papercuts-ninja) ** Also affects: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntuone-client Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntuone-client Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Summary changed: - Ubuntu One 'ticks' are inconsistent + Ubuntu One emblems are inconsistently placed at icons ** Summary changed: - Ubuntu One emblems are inconsistently placed at icons + Ubuntu One emblems are inconsistently placed on the icons in Nautilus -- Ubuntu One emblems are inconsistently placed on the icons in Nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669666 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 602708] Re: Package: All in one Sidebar extenson for Firefox
** Also affects: all-in-one-sidebar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Package: All in one Sidebar extenson for Firefox + all-in-one-sidebar transitional package shows up in Maverick Software Center -- all-in-one-sidebar transitional package shows up in Maverick Software Center https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602708 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 681872] Re: Greek, Modern (1453-) name contains distracting detail
The Debian bug report has been marked as Won't Fix, because the maintainers don't like to deviate from the official standard. The current naming of Greek is the ISO standard, which can be observed at http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php, and they do not want to change that. We won't change the standard. iso-codes is a package that provides a list of names as they are in a standard. Unless one of my comaintainers wants to add the common name hack we had to introduce to deal with the Taiwan issue, I'm not keen to go this way and play with names coming from the standard. There are more oddities in the list. I discovered that the official name for the language with the code 'nld' is Dutch; Flemish, even though Flemish doesn't exist as a separate language. Calling Dutch Flemish makes just as much sense as naming 'en-GB' English; Kentish. Although adhering to an internationally accepted specification saves us work and prevents stepping on sensitive toes, we should consider whether the names used for languages are not confusing or even incorrect. -- Greek, Modern (1453-) name contains distracting detail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 682089] [NEW] Jack plug in front doesn't mute back of Realtek ALC883 (HDA NVidia)
Public bug reported: My desktop PC's motherboard is the Asus M3N78-EH. This motherboard has a jack plug socket at its back panel, which I use to connect my speakers to. It also has a connector, which is connected to the audio panel at the front of the computer case. The front panel has a microphone and a headset jack plug socket. I've always got my speakers plugged in the back. When I plug in my headset in the front, the microphone works just fine. I also hear good sound via my headset. However, the audio is also sent to the back output, to the speakers. I believe, though, that the speakers should be muted when the headset is plugged in. The audio chip is a Realtek ALC883, and I see lot of mentions of HDA NVidia as well, though I'm not sure what that means. This is probably related to the NVIDIA Geforce 8200 chip-set this motherboard has. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: alsa-base 1.0.23+dfsg-2ubuntu1b1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-6.17-generic 2.6.37-rc3 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-6-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23. Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: qense 1704 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: qense 1704 F...m pulseaudio Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'NVidia'/'HDA NVidia at 0xf9e78000 irq 21' Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC883' Components : 'HDA:10ec0883,1043829f,0012' Controls : 35 Simple ctrls : 20 Date: Sat Nov 27 13:00:42 2010 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en LANG=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: alsa-driver dmi.bios.date: 08/06/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0415 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: M3N78-EH dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0415:bd08/06/2008:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnM3N78-EH:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer ** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- Jack plug in front doesn't mute back of Realtek ALC883 (HDA NVidia) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 682089] Re: Jack plug in front doesn't mute back of Realtek ALC883 (HDA NVidia)
-- Jack plug in front doesn't mute back of Realtek ALC883 (HDA NVidia) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675154] Re: Compiz crashes randomly on Natty
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 675506 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675506 This bug is most likely a duplicate of bug #675506, therefore I'm marking it as such. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 675506 Compiz crashes when scrolling in Openoffice * You can subscribe to bug 675506 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/675506/+subscribe -- Compiz crashes randomly on Natty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477285] Re: Can't copy text from software item descriptions
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Milestone: None = nt10-sc-metadata ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Assignee: (unassigned) = Papercuts Ninja (papercuts-ninja) -- Can't copy text from software item descriptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 644168] Re: Rotation in Shotwell is incompatible with some other applications
** Also affects: gnome-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: eog (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Rotation in Shotwell is incompatible with some other applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 644133] Re: Rotation with Shotwell is not compatible with EOG
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 644168 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644168 Thank you for taking the time to report this issue. However, I am rejecting this as a paper cut because a paper cut is a small usability issue in default or featured applications that are easy to install. From the conversation of the upstream developers it seems that this issue is complex, affecting multiple applications, and is not trivial to fix. Therefore it is not a paper cut. This issue also is a duplicate of another bug report, bug #644168. It is probably better to have one bug report for all applications where this can go wrong. Please follow the conversation there from now on. Thanks! ** Changed in: eog Importance: Unknown = Undecided ** Changed in: eog Remote watch: trac.yorba.org/ #2581 = None ** Changed in: shotwell Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: shotwell Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: shotwell Remote watch: None = trac.yorba.org/ #2581 ** Project changed: hundredpapercuts = null ** Changed in: null Status: New = Invalid ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 644168 Rotation in Shotwell is incompatible with some other applications * You can subscribe to bug 644168 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/644168/+subscribe -- Rotation with Shotwell is not compatible with EOG https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644133 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 646834] Re: bad error message: something wicked happened
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- bad error message: something wicked happened https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646834 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 36812] Re: Keyboard layout change on hotkeys press instead of release and do not work well with shortcuts
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue. However, I'm declining this as a paper cut because this bug is not trivially fixable. A paper cut is a small usability problem in default and featured applications that affect many users. Please note that I'm marking this as Invalid for the One Hundred Paper Cuts project ONLY. I've opened a new task for Xorg in Ubuntu—which was missing—that makes this bug show up on the radar of the people whose task it is to look after X. Previously this tasked lacked, so the Ubuntu X developers couldn't have known this bug existed. A task for xorg should have been added when this bug was marked as Invalid for control-center. ** Also affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Project changed: hundredpapercuts = null ** Changed in: null Status: New = Invalid -- Keyboard layout change on hotkeys press instead of release and do not work well with shortcuts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36812 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 646834] Re: bad error message: something wicked happened
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue. I'm accepting this as a paper cut because this is a small issue affecting usability in an application that is present in the default installation of both Ubuntu and Kubuntu. This is an issue in a place that a lot of users will not see very often, so am I marking the priority as Low. ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Milestone: None = nt7-potpourri ** Summary changed: - bad error message: something wicked happened + APT gives unclear error message: something wicked happened when hostname of archive cannot be found -- APT gives unclear error message: something wicked happened when hostname of archive cannot be found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646834 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 646699] Re: Nautilus; unclear whether cut or copy used
** Tags added: needs-design ** Also affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Nautilus; unclear whether cut or copy used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646699 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 638659] Re: Enable Auto-Scroll and Smooth Scrolling by Default in Firefox
** Also affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Enable Auto-Scroll and Smooth Scrolling by Default in Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129403] Re: [upstream] white spaces disappear beyond right margin
Thank you for taking the time to report this to the One Hundred Paper Cuts project. However, as you indicated yourself this issue is quite a complex bug report. A paper cut, in contrast, is a small usability issue that is easy to fix. This is most certainly not easy to fix, considering the first bug report on the OpenOffice tracker was from 2005. Therefore I'm marking this as Invalid for the One Hundred Paper Cuts project. Don't worry, though, I'm NOT marking this Invalid as a bug report, I'm just declining it as a paper cut. ** Project changed: hundredpapercuts = null ** Changed in: null Status: New = Invalid -- [upstream] white spaces disappear beyond right margin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283500] Re: Synaptic, update-manager, apt-get and wget should share proxy settings
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue in the One Hundred Paper Cuts project. However, I am rejecting this as a paper cut because it is not a simple usability issue in default or featured applications, but instead a larger, complex problem. Don't worry, I'm ONLY setting this as Invalid for the One Hundred Paper Cuts project. Because there appears to be quite some uncertainty about where this bug is caused and how widespread it is, I'm setting the statuses of this bug in the Ubuntu packages to Incomplete and the importances to Undecided. This should also help to make this bug show up on the radar of the right people again. ** Project changed: hundredpapercuts = null ** Changed in: null Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Low = Undecided ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Importance: Low = Undecided ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Low = Undecided ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete ** Changed in: synaptic Status: Invalid = New -- Synaptic, update-manager, apt-get and wget should share proxy settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 677143] Re: evince assert failure: *** glibc detected *** evince: free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x00007f317293de20 ***
Can find no private data in the attachments, therefore I'm making this bug public. ** Visibility changed to: Public -- evince assert failure: *** glibc detected *** evince: free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x7f317293de20 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677143 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 681872] Re: Greek, Modern (1453-) name contains distracting detail
Thank you for helping with making Ubuntu better by reporting this bug. I'm accepting this issue as a valid papercut, because it affects the way a part of the interface makes users feel, and am forwarding this bug to the Debian BTS. This issue indeed needs to be fixed in Debian, as Ubuntu simply syncs this package. Although I encourage everyone to work on this bug, I would like to ask to send a possible patch to the bug report in Debian BTS, as fixing this issue should be done there. ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Milestone: None = nt7-potpourri ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: New = Triaged -- Greek, Modern (1453-) name contains distracting detail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 681872] Re: Greek, Modern (1453-) name contains distracting detail
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #605057 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605057 ** Also affects: iso-codes (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605057 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Greek, Modern (1453-) name contains distracting detail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 681872] Re: Greek, Modern (1453-) name contains distracting detail
I have confirmed this bug myself in Debian unstable's iso-codes 3.22-1 and have forwarded the issue upstream. Therefore I'm marking it as Triaged. Because this is affecting usability, albeit it not too intrusively, I'm setting the priority to Low. ** Changed in: iso-codes (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: iso-codes (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- Greek, Modern (1453-) name contains distracting detail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 681940] [NEW] Facebook authentication failure is very unclear
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gwibber When Facebook authentication in Gwibber fails, a notification is shown using Notify OSD. However, the icon used for this notification is Facebook's logo, and the title of this notification is simply 'facebook'. Its body only mentions a Facebook authentication failure. Nothing in this notification message indicates that this error happened in Gwibber. It could just as well have taken place in Empathy, or maybe even in the web browser! The notification should be changed to convey that it is sent by Gwibber. Also, currently when you are notified via Notify OSD of a Facebook authentication failure, the Facebook entry in the accounts dialogue still says that you were successfully authenticated to Facebook. However, this is not the case and causes even more confusion, because the user will by now most certainly not know that the authentication failure was actually in Gwibber. The entry from ~/.cache/notify-osd.log: [2010-11-26T22:25:38-00:00, Gwibber ] facebook Authentication failed, please re-authorize ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gwibber 2.91.1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-6.17-generic 2.6.37-rc3 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-6-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Nov 26 22:37:22 2010 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en LANG=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash RelatedPackageVersions: desktopcouch 0.6.9b-0ubuntu1 gnome-keyring 2.92.92.is.2.31.91-0ubuntu5 SourcePackage: gwibber ** Affects: gwibber (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- Facebook authentication failure is very unclear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681940 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 681940] Re: Facebook authentication failure is very unclear
-- Facebook authentication failure is very unclear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681940 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 681938] [NEW] It is possible to click on AppMenu menus when in workspace switcher, but they don't show
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity When you are in the workspace switcher mode of Unity (on Natty) it is possible to click on the menus shown in the top panel by AppMenu. When you click on such a menu, on the panel the texture is changed to make it look like the menu is open. However, any possibly open menu that should be located underneath the menu's name is not shown; it seems to be hidden underneath the black of the workspace switcher. One possible solution could be to make Unity's launcher and panel non- interactive when the user is in the work-space switcher. However, personally I would prefer to keep the interface sensitive—as to prevent user confusion because of a seemingly frozen interface that is still there—but instead make everything work, despite the workspace switcher being displayed instead of the desktop, or open windows. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: unity 3.2.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-6.17-generic 2.6.37-rc3 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-6-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Nov 26 22:37:03 2010 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en LANG=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: unity ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- It is possible to click on AppMenu menus when in workspace switcher, but they don't show https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 681938] Re: It is possible to click on AppMenu menus when in workspace switcher, but they don't show
-- It is possible to click on AppMenu menus when in workspace switcher, but they don't show https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680615] Re: Firefox first suggestion is to open a *.bin file with gedit
The mime-type of the *.bin file is 'application/octet-stream' and remains so after it is downloaded. Gedit cannot open it, because it is a binary file. However, I agree with you that this is not really a bug in Firefox. -- Firefox first suggestion is to open a *.bin file with gedit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680581] [NEW] OpenOffice.org Write mislocates one point in graphs when exporting to PDF
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org When you export an ODT document containing graphs to PDF in OpenOffice.org Write, the PDF will have distorted graphs. This is caused by the dislocation of one point in every graph. The point in the graph that has the second-highest value for x will be set to x=0 and placed at the y-axis. The consequence of this is that one point is not where it should be and that the line of the graph is not following the correct path, making the graph distorted and incorrect. Please find attached a document you can use to reproduce this bug. I'm running OpenOffice.org Writer 1:3.2.1-7ubuntu1 on Ubuntu Natty, amd64. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: openoffice.org-writer 1:3.2.1-7ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-5.14-generic 2.6.37-rc2 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-5-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Nov 23 19:02:23 2010 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en LANG=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- OpenOffice.org Write mislocates one point in graphs when exporting to PDF https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680581] Re: OpenOffice.org Write mislocates one point in graphs when exporting to PDF
-- OpenOffice.org Write mislocates one point in graphs when exporting to PDF https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680581] Re: OpenOffice.org Write mislocates one point in graphs when exporting to PDF
** Attachment added: 4.odt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/680581/+attachment/1742688/+files/4.odt -- OpenOffice.org Write mislocates one point in graphs when exporting to PDF https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680581] Re: OpenOffice.org Write mislocates one point in graphs when exporting to PDF
The resulting PDF with the wrong graphs. ** Attachment added: 4.pdf https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/680581/+attachment/1742689/+files/4.pdf -- OpenOffice.org Write mislocates one point in graphs when exporting to PDF https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680581] Re: OpenOffice.org Write mislocates one point in graphs when exporting to PDF
I just discovered that I ruined the graphs myself. Apologises for the noise! ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Attachment removed: 4.pdf https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/680581/+attachment/1742689/+files/4.pdf ** Attachment removed: 4.odt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/680581/+attachment/1742688/+files/4.odt -- OpenOffice.org Write mislocates one point in graphs when exporting to PDF https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680615] [NEW] Firefox first suggestion is to open a *.bin file with gedit
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox When you download software in the form of a *.bin file—e.g. Google Earth from http://www.google.com/earth/download/ge/—in the download dialogue of Firefox opening the *.bin file with gedit is selected by default. However, this is software, not something you would like to open in a text editor. In order to not make users end up with Gedit filling their screen with error messages or a huge amount of characters, I would make Firefox select Save As by default. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: firefox 4.0~b7+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-5.14-generic 2.6.37-rc2 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-5-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Nov 23 20:43:15 2010 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en LANG=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- Firefox first suggestion is to open a *.bin file with gedit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680615] Re: Firefox first suggestion is to open a *.bin file with gedit
-- Firefox first suggestion is to open a *.bin file with gedit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680129] [NEW] BUG: Bad page state in process update-manager pfn:71015
Public bug reported: I was warned by Apport that a serious kernel issue had occured after Update Manager was done checking for updates by reloading the APT cache. ProblemType: KernelOops DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: linux-image-2.6.37-5-generic 2.6.37-5.14 Regression: Yes ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-5.14-generic 2.6.37-rc2 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-5-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov 22 17:53:01 2010 Failure: oops SourcePackage: linux Title: BUG: Bad page state in process update-manager pfn:71015 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-kerneloops kernel-oops natty -- BUG: Bad page state in process update-manager pfn:71015 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680129] Re: BUG: Bad page state in process update-manager pfn:71015
-- BUG: Bad page state in process update-manager pfn:71015 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 629024] Re: Clarify which kernel is updated in Grub
Making GRUB have those submenus would be a nice solution, but it is too complicated for a bug report here. I would discuss it somewhere else. -- Clarify which kernel is updated in Grub https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629024 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675935] Re: Can't type in Unity when running with unity --show
I'm setting the status back to Incomplete as Alex left the bug. Incomplete is the appropriate status for this bug as it is in the phase were more information is collected in order to determine the actions that need to be taken. When changing the status of a bug report it is custom to leave a comment to support the change. Please do so in the future. Thanks! ** Changed in: unity Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Can't type in Unity when running with unity --show https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 629024] Re: Clarify which kernel is updated in Grub
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue. However, it would not be helpful to tell users what kernel was updated last during boot. Adding more technical text to something that is already too technical is only going to make things more confusing. The average users does not know what a kernel is. Whenever possible, Grub should be hidden to the users and not show itself. Another reason why this wouldn't be a valid paper cut is that it is not trivial to fix. Therefore I'm marking this bug as Invalid in the One Hundred Paper Cuts project. I'm also closing the Grub task as Invalid, because of the same two reasons. It is more a feature request than a proper bug or paper cut, and therefore should be discussed elsewhere, most preferably upstream. ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Clarify which kernel is updated in Grub https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629024 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 677150] [NEW] Build AFM versions of the Ubuntu Font Family during build time, for use with LaTeX
Public bug reported: At the moment it is not possible to use the Ubuntu Font Family in LaTeX without importing it manually. It would be great if this font would be made available in LaTeX by default, so you can choose to use a modern font without too much of a hassle. Vincent-Xavier Jumel posted an article on his blog with some instructions for converting the font to AFM at http://blog.thetys- retz.net/post/2010/11/01/Importing-Ubuntu-Font-Family-in-LaTeX. I'm requesting to generate this AFM file at build time. We could then make LaTeX recommend this package, so every user on Ubuntu who installs LaTeX will be able to use the font straight away. Related: bug #603574. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: ttf-ubuntu-font-family 0.69+ufl-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-5.13-generic 2.6.37-rc2 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-5-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Nov 18 20:25:03 2010 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en LANG=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubuntu-font-family-sources ** Affects: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- Build AFM versions of the Ubuntu Font Family during build time, for use with LaTeX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 677150] Re: Build AFM versions of the Ubuntu Font Family during build time, for use with LaTeX
-- Build AFM versions of the Ubuntu Font Family during build time, for use with LaTeX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 677150] Re: Generate TeX files of the Ubuntu Font Family during build time
a) I referred to AFM files because I tried to use terminology I didn't fully grasp in order to make this bug report clearer. I removed references to it from the description, because I may have been using the wrong words. I'm not that familiar with LaTeX, I just play with it incidentally. For the other questions I cannot help you. I would like to say that I get error messages when trying to run the autoinst command on the TTF files downloaded from font.ubuntu.com: for each file I get this: ERROR: I've parsed both 'Ubuntu-BI.ttf' and 'Ubuntu-I.ttf' as Family Width regular Weight regular Shape roman Size0-0 No file is generated as a result. ** Summary changed: - Build AFM versions of the Ubuntu Font Family during build time, for use with LaTeX + Generate TeX files of the Ubuntu Font Family during build time ** Description changed: At the moment it is not possible to use the Ubuntu Font Family in LaTeX without importing it manually. It would be great if this font would be made available in LaTeX by default, so you can choose to use a modern font without too much of a hassle. Vincent-Xavier Jumel posted an article on his blog with some - instructions for converting the font to AFM at http://blog.thetys- - retz.net/post/2010/11/01/Importing-Ubuntu-Font-Family-in-LaTeX. + instructions for converting the font for use with TeX at http://blog + .thetys-retz.net/post/2010/11/01/Importing-Ubuntu-Font-Family-in-LaTeX. - I'm requesting to generate this AFM file at build time. We could then - make LaTeX recommend this package, so every user on Ubuntu who installs - LaTeX will be able to use the font straight away. + I'm requesting to generate these files at build time. We could then make + LaTeX recommend the resulting package, so every user on Ubuntu who + installs LaTeX will be able to use the font straight away. Related: bug #603574 (errors showing up during AFM build) -- Generate TeX files of the Ubuntu Font Family during build time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675154] [NEW] Compiz crashes randomly on Natty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz I'm running an up-to-date installation of Natty and Compiz keeps crashing randomly. I'm using the default settings. When restarting compiz on tty1 with the command 'compiz --display :0' you'll see the following error message after Compiz crashed again: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_implboost::exception_detail::error_info_injectorboost::bad_function_call ' what(): call to empty boost::function The crash seems to happen only when manipulating tables in OpenOffice.org, but I haven't confirmed that fully yet. The document I'm using is a ODT file converted from OOXML's docx, containing table parts that were originally created in Microsoft Word 2007. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: compiz 1:0.9.2.1+glibmainloop-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-3.11-generic 2.6.37-rc1 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-3-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,ccp,move,resize,place,decoration,neg,commands,text,workarounds,imgjpeg,session,dbus,gnomecompat,mousepoll,png,vpswitch,mag,svg,regex,resizeinfo,animation,expo,snap,ezoom,wall,fade,scale,switcher] Date: Sun Nov 14 12:50:57 2010 MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name PackageArchitecture: all PciDisplay: 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation G94 [GeForce 9600 GT] [10de:0622] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl:en_GB:en LANG=nl_NL.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.37-3-generic root=UUID=6bd4eace-488a-499e-a79c-ee7e11ce089e ro quiet splash RelatedPackageVersions: xserver-xorg 1:7.5+6ubuntu3 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.9~git20100924-0ubuntu3 libdrm2 2.4.22-2ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-1ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.13.2-1ubuntu1 SourcePackage: compiz dmi.bios.date: 08/06/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0415 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: M3N78-EH dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0415:bd08/06/2008:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnM3N78-EH:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer system: distro = Ubuntu, architecture = x86_64, kernel = 2.6.37-3-generic ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- Compiz crashes randomly on Natty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
