[Bug 450787] [NEW] MTRR Invalid Argument at LiveCD, nvidia hardware
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-core Hi, I downloaded a Daily Build Image and packed it on a USB Stick just to try 9.10 Karmic Koala. Uname -a 2.6.31-13-generic Sat Oct 10 15:27:55 When I boot the system on the stick with no options, for a few seconds I can see the new splash screen, then the screen goes black instantly. When the system is booted (the led on the stick stops blinking), I'm not seeing anything, still the same black screen. The screen didn't blink (switching modes). I can't switch to the ttys ether. Pushing power off, reboots normally, but still no screen on the shutdown. If I choose save graphics mode, it's the same. Only if I remove quiet and splash from the grub line, I can boot to the command line and switch the ttys. When i enter startx gnome starts but crashes immediately (the Desktop and the mouse is visible for a few seconds, but no interaction possible). xserver throws this error: error setting MTRR (base=0xfb00, size=0x00e0, type=1) Invalid argument (22) My system is a Dell Vostro 1500 Laptop, with a Geforce 8600M GT When I use the Ubuntu 9.10 Beta (not daily build) I don't get this error, the system is working normally. Thanks for reading, feel free to ask for more information if necessary. dansch ** Affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- MTRR Invalid Argument at LiveCD, nvidia hardware https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112502] Re: gkrellm can show / sensors can't show the hardware sensors
OK, I tried it with 8.04.1 and the sensors are shown on xfce4-sensor-applet. So everything seems pretty normal. Thanks for all the work so far. ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- gkrellm can show / sensors can't show the hardware sensors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112502 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112514] Re: Firefox Menu Font Size Is To Large
With Ubuntu 8.04.1 the problem seems fixed to me. The font sizes are the same. -- Firefox Menu Font Size Is To Large https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112508] Re: irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
Hi, I open this bug, but it is very old I think. So I think I can close or delete the bug. And I can't confirm if this bug still exists, because I sold the computer on which I had this bug. Also the status won't fix, is a bad indication. But thanks anyway. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192119] Re: [hardy] iwl3945 fails reporting networks with iwlist wlan0 scan
** Attachment added: dmesg-reboot.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13473131/dmesg-reboot.log -- [hardy] iwl3945 fails reporting networks with iwlist wlan0 scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192119] Re: [hardy] iwl3945 fails reporting networks with iwlist wlan0 scan
** Attachment added: dmesg-nowireless.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13473129/dmesg-nowireless.log -- [hardy] iwl3945 fails reporting networks with iwlist wlan0 scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192119] Re: [hardy] iwl3945 fails reporting networks with iwlist wlan0 scan
** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13473108/lspci-vvnn.log -- [hardy] iwl3945 fails reporting networks with iwlist wlan0 scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192119] Re: [hardy] iwl3945 fails reporting networks with iwlist wlan0 scan
** Attachment added: version.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13473102/version.log -- [hardy] iwl3945 fails reporting networks with iwlist wlan0 scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192119] Re: [hardy] iwl3945 fails reporting networks with iwlist wlan0 scan
Same Problem here. Just updated to Hardy. And the Wireless (with iwl3945) is some kind of unusable. nm-applet won't find any networks. If I set my network manually it's working, but sometimes I get only a 1 Mb/s, no Broadcast- and Gatewayaddress. Just tried to rmmod/modprobe the modules like in Bug #205506 still no change. dmesg gives me (boot and then turn the Wireless kill switch on): [ 31.360867] iwl3945: Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945ABG/BG Network Connection driver for Linux, 1.2.0 [ 31.360870] iwl3945: Copyright(c) 2003-2007 Intel Corporation [ 31.361032] iwl3945: Detected Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection [ 32.211817] iwl3945: Tunable channels: 13 802.11bg, 23 802.11a channels [ 32.212344] wmaster0: Selected rate control algorithm 'iwl-3945-rs' [ 32.410080] udev: renamed network interface wlan0 to eth1 [ 63.108784] iwl3945: Radio Frequency Kill Switch is On: [ 63.108789] Kill switch must be turned off for wireless networking to work. [ 63.113647] atkbd.c: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x88 on isa0060/serio0). [ 63.113658] atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e008 keycode' to make it known. [ 63.169885] iwl3945: Error sending REPLY_TX_PWR_TABLE_CMD: time out after 500ms. [ 106.439140] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready [ 118.445307] atkbd.c: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x88 on isa0060/serio0). [ 118.445318] atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e008 keycode' to make it known. ~$ sudo iwlist eth1 scan eth1 Scan completed : Cell 01 - Address: 00:15:0C:CB:8A:71 ESSID:unbewohnt Mode:Master Channel:7 Frequency:2.442 GHz (Channel 7) Quality=54/100 Signal level=-76 dBm Noise level=-127 dBm Encryption key:on IE: WPA Version 1 Group Cipher : TKIP Pairwise Ciphers (1) : TKIP Authentication Suites (1) : PSK Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s 9 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s 48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s Extra:tsf=00078c2308c9 Cell 02 - Address: 00:1A:4F:9A:CF:7F ESSID: Mode:Master Channel:11 Frequency:2.462 GHz (Channel 11) Quality=69/100 Signal level=-64 dBm Noise level=-127 dBm Encryption key:on IE: WPA Version 1 Group Cipher : TKIP Pairwise Ciphers (1) : TKIP Authentication Suites (1) : PSK Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s; 22 Mb/s 6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s 36 Mb/s; 48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s Extra:tsf=01e86236f234 There should be more cells and also they should have names. When I connect to unbewohnt I get no IP/wrong IP ifconfig -a eth1 Link encap:Ethernet Hardware Adresse x UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metrik:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) wmaster0 Link encap:UNSPEC Hardware Adresse x-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metrik:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) After 30 min I can see 2 networks with their names in nm-applet but not with: sudo iwlist eth1 scanning [sudo] password for dan: eth1 Scan completed : Cell 01 - Address: 00:15:0C:CB:8A:71 ESSID:unbewohnt Mode:Master Channel:7 Extra:tsf=0007b64b8573 Cell 02 - Address: 00:1A:4F:9A:CF:7F ESSID: Mode:Master Channel:11 ** Attachment added: uname-a.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13473093/uname-a.log -- [hardy] iwl3945 fails reporting networks with iwlist wlan0 scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70380] Re: Partitions on external hd are mounted twice
Hi, I have the same problem but with CDs. When I insert a disk before the boot up sequence (or it is already in the tray before boot) I have two icons for one disc on the desktop. If I unmount one (no matter which one) the other icon stays and is unmountable till I reboot. Thanks Dan -- Partitions on external hd are mounted twice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112508] Re: irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
Hi, normally I'm using the irqpoll option because as I have written with pci=assign-buses in an older post my USB-mouse and the wireless LAN aren't working. I changed irqpoll at boot to pci=assign-buses just to give you a feedback. I hope my dmidecode is exploitable even if I'm computer isn't properly usable with pci=assign-busses. (By the way: I know there is a newer version of the Bios for my system, but I have to downgrade to an older version because the new one is very crappy.) Thanks for taking care of my problem Dan ** Attachment added: dmidecode http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9206696/dmidecode -- irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112514] Re: Firefox Menu Font Size Is To Large
Hi, I set it the first time in gnome (or better used the standard font size), because I installed xfce later. Afterwards I set it in xfce. -- Firefox Menu Font Size Is To Large https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112514] Re: Firefox Menu Font Size Is To Large
Yes I do more or less, because I found some way to compensate. I use nautilus as file manager and set the font there on a 12 so it looks like a 10 on the xfce. Then I changed the xfce System Font to 10 and the font in Firefox shrinked to nearly the nautilus desktop size. So it is still a bit larger but not as bad as it was on my screenshot. Thanks for your interest Dan -- Firefox Menu Font Size Is To Large https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112502] Re: gkrellm can show / sensors can't show the hardware sensors
One more: I did a strace -f sensors see attechment for output. It says a couple of times something about: access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) Yes this is true this file is missing. I googled for it and it seems to be common that this file is missing so I touched it. But still no working sensors. ** Attachment added: strace http://librarian.launchpad.net/7834480/strace -- gkrellm can show / sensors can't show the hardware sensors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112502 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112502] Re: gkrellm can show / sensors can't show the hardware sensors
Hi, I read in the bug report for the sensors-applet (Bug #94558) that there was a problem in hdd-temp with invalid characters in the hdd description, so I installed the version 0.3-beta15-36 of hdd-temp. This resolves the problem with the name of the hdd and a glitch in the sensor-applet of gnome. But I have still a non functioning xsensors, xfce-sensors-applet and sensors. The new hdd-temp didn't change anything for my problem. $ ls /proc/acpi/thermal_zone THZN THZV $ cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THZN/temperature temperature: 54 C $ cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THZV/temperature temperature: 67 C $ sudo hddtemp /dev/sda /dev/sda: HTS548080M9AT00: 40°C It looks like everything is there but isn't used by sensors I guess. Maybe I'm wrong with setting up the sensors or missed something. But gkrellm and sensors-applet (gnome) does show the right information. Any hints are welcome. Just ask for more debug info. Greetings Dan -- gkrellm can show / sensors can't show the hardware sensors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112502 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112508] Re: irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
@ svetj i found something, but can't tell if it will work for you. And it looks very dangerous, but anyway have a look: http://www.cpqlinux.com/acpi-howto.html#irq9_hack Or try it with pci=biosirq. --- On more thing to my problem: Now I'm using the pci=noacpi and when I choose reboot from a running system the newly booted system behaves like in the other cases (unusable usb mouse and no wireless), but if I choose shutdown and start the system by power button everything works fine. I also choose a new Bios version and checked the DSDT Table, but there were no errors in it only one warning. So no need for fixing it. Or not? -- irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 22336] Re: CPU overheats during high usage throttling not supported
Hi, I have a similar problem if I`m using the CPU on full power and without any limitations the THZ*s will rise above 105°C/80°C (yes it is that high) and the system is going down, but gladly in a controlled manner (no file system check needed on next start up). But I found a more or less working solution if I $ echo 133 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq OR $ echo powersave /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor With that I can use the system even if it is working on full throttle a hole day. The processor is a Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.86GHz with 8 steppings Fell free to ask for more informations. Greetings Dan -- CPU overheats during high usage throttling not supported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112508] Re: irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
OK but I tried. Couldn't find any new information. But it seems like a common problem. Did you ever try to fix your possibly broken dsdt table like describe in http://acpi.sourceforge.net/ ? Maybe this won't fix everything but a part of it? I'm not that experienced to give valuable advices. Greetings Dan -- irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112508] Re: irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
Hi, found some more stuff, maybe this has something to do with it. [8.845436] PCI quirk: region 1000-107f claimed by ICH6 ACPI/GPIO/TCO [8.845485] PCI quirk: region 1300-133f claimed by ICH6 GPIO [8.846167] PCI: Transparent bridge - :00:1e.0 [8.846274] PCI: Bus #07 (-#0a) is hidden behind transparent bridge #06 (-#06) (try 'pci=assign-busses') [8.846329] Please report the result to linux-kernel to fix this permanently (OK, it is only copied from my dmesg, but I think it has something to do with the Texas Instruments PCIxx21 Integrated FlashMedia Controller and the transparent bridge) But it is also possible that I am very wrong. I'm just guessing. More info for the apic [8.393662] Local APIC disabled by BIOS -- you can enable it with lapic The problem appears on a Laptop with limited bios settings (actually I can only set the Time and the boot order). I also tried to use a fixed DSDT Table from http://acpi.sourceforge.net/ . But this also didn't help. @svetj Sorry I can't help you further. I read your thread and found some useful info for my problem, but don't know if the problems have something in common. Because my sound is working fine even without irqpoll. So thanks for your answer anyway. And thanks to those who trying to solve this problem. -- irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114815] Can't set (for me) important partition options
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-mount Hi, I have a FAT and a ntfs partition on my system. I would like to hide (or no automounting) the ntfs partition, so I edited fstab, but the partition is still mounted on startup. And I like to set the uid, gid, noauto and exec for the fat partition, but this isn't working. I found a guide that said to set those options right click on a device. Uh windows feeling and: - the mountpoint isn't moveable. It only uses /media - the options must be separated by spaces and not by commas like in fstab (not very intuitive) - if I set common options like user(s) und defaults it says invalid option, but it don't say which options are valid. - you can set the security relevant option exec and uid but can`t set gid... The owner of my partitions is root, group plugdev and not me. From man gnome-mount Note that HAL has a notion of what mount options are valid for a given volume. They are listed in the HAL property volume.mount.valid_options on the device object representing the volume to mount.. Ok there are the possible options, but no word about why other options are not allowed and HOW TO CHANGE THEM. I thought I am the root or am I not? So I used hal-set-property but there is no documentation for it and it says succinct: This program attempts to set property for a device. Note that, due to security considerations, it may not be possible to set a property No additional words nessacery. One more outline from man gnome-mount In addition to using HAL as the mechanism for mounting file systems, the /etc/fstab file is also consulted as HAL will refuse to mount any file system listed in this file as it would violate system policy. If this is the case, gnome-mount will invoke mount(1) as the calling user rather than invoking the Mount method on the org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Volume interface on the device object representing the volume / drive. This means that settings (mount point, mount options, file system type) read by gnome-mount are not passed along as these are already specified in the /etc/fstab file and there are no mechanism to override them. When parsing the /etc/fstab file, gnome-mount (and also HAL for that matter) resolves symbolic links and also respects the LABEL= and UUID= notations. For example, if this line is in /etc/fstab LABEL=MyVolume /mnt/myvolume auto user,defaults 0 0 then gnome-mount mounts the file system with the label MyVolume via mount(1) and /etc/fstab rather than using the HAL mechanisms. This sounds like a solution but it is not working. Some options aren't interpreted or ignored, normal mounted drives can't be unmounted or are missing in places or computer. Another solution could be to change the policies in /etc/hal/fdi/policy by editing or creating a file (Not that beginner friendly). I have a lot of respect of such hacks. I would prefer if hal could also use the fstab as mentioned in the man. Thanks for reading. Feel free to post solutions or hints Greetings Dan ** Affects: gnome-mount (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Can't set (for me) important partition options https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114815] Re: Can't set (for me) important partition options
** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-mount Hi, I have a FAT and a ntfs partition on my system. I would like to hide (or no automounting) the ntfs partition, so I edited fstab, but the partition is still mounted on startup. And I like to set the uid, gid, noauto and exec for the fat partition, but this isn't working. I found a guide that said to set those options right click on a device. Uh windows feeling and: - the mountpoint isn't moveable. It only uses /media - the options must be separated by spaces and not by commas like in fstab (not very intuitive) - if I set common options like user(s) und defaults it says invalid option, but it don't say which options are valid. - you can set the security relevant option exec and uid but can`t set gid... - The owner of my partitions is root, group plugdev and not me. + The owner of my partitions is 'unknown' and not my user. From man gnome-mount Note that HAL has a notion of what mount options are valid for a given volume. They are listed in the HAL property volume.mount.valid_options on the device object representing the volume to mount.. Ok there are the possible options, but no word about why other options are not allowed and HOW TO CHANGE THEM. I thought I am the root or am I not? So I used hal-set-property but there is no documentation for it and it says succinct: This program attempts to set property for a device. Note that, due to security considerations, it may not be possible to set a property No additional words nessacery. One more outline from man gnome-mount In addition to using HAL as the mechanism for mounting file systems, the /etc/fstab file is also consulted as HAL will refuse to mount any file system listed in this file as it would violate system policy. If this is the case, gnome-mount will invoke mount(1) as the calling user rather than invoking the Mount method on the org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Volume interface on the device object representing the volume / drive. This means that settings (mount point, mount options, file system type) read by gnome-mount are not passed along as these are already specified in the /etc/fstab file and there are no mechanism to override them. When parsing the /etc/fstab file, gnome-mount (and also HAL for that matter) resolves symbolic links and also respects the LABEL= and UUID= notations. For example, if this line is in /etc/fstab LABEL=MyVolume /mnt/myvolume auto user,defaults 0 0 then gnome-mount mounts the file system with the label MyVolume via mount(1) and /etc/fstab rather than using the HAL mechanisms. This sounds like a solution but it is not working. Some options aren't interpreted or ignored, normal mounted drives can't be unmounted or are missing in places or computer. Another solution could be to change the policies in /etc/hal/fdi/policy by editing or creating a file (Not that beginner friendly). I have a lot of respect of such hacks. I would prefer if hal could also use the fstab as mentioned in the man. Thanks for reading. Feel free to post solutions or hints Greetings Dan -- Can't set (for me) important partition options https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112508] Re: irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
And some more information, I tried again the different boot options and saved all the dmesg from every case. But his would be to much to post, contact me if you need one. booted with no options: - sound is working - usb - mouse is not usable - no wireless network - processor is speedsteping - system preformance is ok booted with lapic: - sound is working - usb - mouse is not usable - no wireless network - processor is working on full throttle - system preforming very slow booted with pci=routeirq: - sound is working - usb - mouse is not usable - no wireless network booted with pci=assign-busses: - sound is working - usb - mouse is not usable - no wireless network booted with acpi=off: - sound is working - usb - mouse _is_ usable - no wireless network - processor is speedsteping - processor thermal sensors are missing (no surprise) booted with pci=noacpi: - everything is working fine (sound, sensors, speedsteping, wireless) At this point I will leave the last option as boot option. I think it will be better than the irqpoll option. I didn't tried to mix the boot options. But I will further test this settings. -- irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112502] gkrellm can show / sensors can't show the hardware sensors
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lm-sensors Hi, I run sensors-detect and the result was to modprobe the i2c_i801 (and the eeprom). Done this, reboot, and run sensors that says: $ sensors No sensors found! Make sure you loaded all the kernel drivers you need. Try sensors-detect to find out which these are. But if I run gkrellm I have 3 temperature sensors. And the gnome-sensor-applet does show those 3. But sensors, xsensors and the xfce4-sensor-applet obviously can't show them on my ICH6 Laptop. Everything needed is loaded (and working see gkrellm) $ lsmod | grep i2c i2c_dev 8708 0 i2c_ec 5888 1 sbs i2c_i8019356 0 i2c_core 22784 4 eeprom,i2c_dev,i2c_ec,i2c_i801 Would be nice to have those temperature sensors running with the xfce-applet. Thanks anyway Dan ** Affects: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- gkrellm can show / sensors can't show the hardware sensors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112502 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112508] irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.20 [9.556000] irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) [9.556000] [c0154394] __report_bad_irq+0x24/0x80 [9.556000] [c015464e] note_interrupt+0x25e/0x290 [9.556000] [c01551cb] handle_level_irq+0xeb/0x120 [9.556000] [c0105b70] do_IRQ+0x40/0x80 [9.556000] [c0104233] common_interrupt+0x23/0x30 [9.556000] [c012007b] sched_balance_self+0x15b/0x2f0 [9.556000] [c01538a0] handle_IRQ_event+0x10/0x60 [9.556000] [c015516d] handle_level_irq+0x8d/0x120 [9.556000] [c0105b70] do_IRQ+0x40/0x80 [9.556000] [c0104233] common_interrupt+0x23/0x30 [9.556000] [c02ee85d] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xd/0x20 [9.556000] [f88bf090] ohci_devctl+0x450/0x680 [ohci1394] [9.556000] [c011e678] __wake_up+0x38/0x50 [9.556000] [f890b01c] hpsb_reset_bus+0x1c/0x30 [ieee1394] [9.556000] [c0137304] run_workqueue+0x94/0x140 [9.556000] [f890d600] delayed_reset_bus+0x0/0xe0 [ieee1394] [9.556000] [c0137d87] worker_thread+0x147/0x170 [9.556000] [c0120b40] default_wake_function+0x0/0x10 [9.556000] [c0137c40] worker_thread+0x0/0x170 [9.556000] [c013ac3a] kthread+0xba/0xf0 [9.556000] [c013ab80] kthread+0x0/0xf0 [9.556000] [c01044c7] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 [9.556000] === [9.556000] handlers: [9.556000] [f8887f10] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x60 [usbcore]) [9.556000] [f8887f10] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x60 [usbcore]) [9.556000] [f8887f10] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x60 [usbcore]) [9.556000] [f8887f10] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x60 [usbcore]) [9.556000] Disabling IRQ #11 $ cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 172285XT-PIC-XTtimer 1:109XT-PIC-XTi8042 2: 0XT-PIC-XTcascade 7: 3XT-PIC-XTohci1394 8: 3XT-PIC-XTrtc 9: 3409XT-PIC-XTacpi 10:184XT-PIC-XTIntel ICH6 11: 10XT-PIC-XTuhci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb3, ehci_hcd:usb4, yenta, tifm_7xx1, ipw2200, eth0, fglrx 12:110XT-PIC-XTi8042 14: 18357XT-PIC-XTlibata 15: 0XT-PIC-XTlibata NMI: 0 LOC: 0 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 I tried booting with 'pci=nomsi', 'pci=assign-busses' and 'noapic'. But only irqpoll gives me a working wireless and usb. Thanks ** Affects: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112508] Re: irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
** Attachment added: dmesg_all http://librarian.launchpad.net/7558007/dmesg_all -- irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112508] Re: irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
** Attachment added: lspci -vv http://librarian.launchpad.net/7558125/lspci%20-vv -- irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112514] Re: Firefox Menu Font Size Is To Large
** Attachment added: Screenshot.jpg http://librarian.launchpad.net/7558237/Screenshot.jpg -- Firefox Menu Font Size Is To Large https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112514] Firefox Menu Font Size Is To Large
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xfdesktop4 Hi, I attached a screenshot of my desktop. I set the desktop font size to 10 and then to 12 and the strangely the firefox menu font was growing to a maybe 14. On the screenshot you see desktop icons, synaptic and firefox with the context menu left. The font size is way to large and annoying e.g. when you fill out forms. I don't want to set the desktop font size to 10 again. Thanks ** Affects: xfdesktop4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Firefox Menu Font Size Is To Large https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
