[Bug 1689356] Re: UI scale being reset to 1 everytime when display sleeps for a while
Started seeing this behaviour on 16.04 (fully updated), since 26-Feb. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689356 Title: UI scale being reset to 1 everytime when display sleeps for a while To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1689356/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332646] Re: sftp does not set timestamps
Related, and possible NOT worth raising as its own bug.
Renaming a zero-length (semaphore) file in Nautilus does NOT change its
time/date stamp.
Tested/verified today with fully updated Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, and
'Nautilus' ('Files' v3.14.3).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332646
Title:
sftp does not set timestamps
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/332646/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1333140] Re: Fix udev rules to consider mmc rpmb partitions
Verified still present, for 16.10 .. New install of 16.10 on 'HP Stream 11 Pro G2'. No issue with install, other than slight delay at startup/re-start(s). Exhibits 15-20 second delay (with screen purple) at EVERY power on/startup. No change, from issue for 16.04 LTS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1333140 Title: Fix udev rules to consider mmc rpmb partitions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1333140/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1333140] Re: Fix udev rules to consider mmc rpmb partitions
This issue is still present on 16.04.1 LTS, and is not resolved by being fully updated. It is also present for 16.10 .. While use of eMMC is not widespread, this UNRESOLVED issue causes (at very least) a 15-20 second delay on startup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1333140 Title: Fix udev rules to consider mmc rpmb partitions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1333140/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292695] Re: Lock screen isn't cat-friendly (no input timemout)
I have NOT yet tested this on clean install of 16.10 .. But NO, it is still present on 16.04.1 LTS, fully updated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292695 Title: Lock screen isn't cat-friendly (no input timemout) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1292695/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292041] Re: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen
Please see Bug #1292695 (which is NOT a duplicate of this NOW CLOSED bug). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041 Title: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1292041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292695] Re: Lock screen isn't cat-friendly (no input timemout)
This is NOT a duplicate of: Bug #1292041 (since closed) This relates to screen not blanking (and screen turning off) after a mouse or keyboard event, when in screen-locked state. This is annoying and is still present in latest, fully patched, Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1292041 Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292695 Title: Lock screen isn't cat-friendly (no input timemout) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1292695/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1293185] Re: Screen saver does not resume after interrupted but not unlocked
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1292041 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041 This is actually a duplicate of: Bug #1292695 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1293185 Title: Screen saver does not resume after interrupted but not unlocked To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1293185/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1302775] Re: Turn Screen off when inactive Fails When in Locked State
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1292041 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041 This is actually a duplicate of: Bug #1292695 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302775 Title: Turn Screen off when inactive Fails When in Locked State To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1302775/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447282] Re: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs)
Re-tested today/yesterday with 16.04 LTS (official release), with existing partitions deleted. HP Stream 11 Pro G2 notebook (Braswell SoC, Celeron N3050), with 64GB eMMC (SSD) storage. Issue still occurs, with prompt (black box) on startup. No pauses (for at command line) doing update/upgrade, but also no updates available (at present). Corrected (per Comment #75, #76), with: $ cat /etc/fstab -- # swap was on /dev/mmcblk0p3 during installation -- $ sudo sfdisk --part-attrs /dev/mmcblk0 3 "63" (after reboot) $ swapon -s -- FilenameTypeSizeUsedPriority /dev/dm-0 partition 4046332 0 -1 -- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447282 Title: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/1447282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447282] Re: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs)
Re-tested today/yesterday with 16.04 LTS (xenial-desktop-amd64, daily- build, 11-Apr), with existing partitions deleted, or SSD secure erased. (a.) HP ProDesk 600 G2 SFF (Skylake, Core i5), with 256GB SSD (SATA 3 interface) storage. No issue occurred. (b.) HP Stream 11 Pro G2 notebook (Braswell SoC, Celeron N3050), with 64GB eMMC (SSD) storage. Issue still occurs, with prompt (black box) on startup. Also has multiple pauses (for at command line) doing update/upgrade. -- This could still be specific to 'NVMe' and 'eMMC' SSD media (which use the simple /sda /sdb /sdc for path), as this appear to be a common feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447282 Title: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/1447282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447282] Re: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs)
Correction: This could still be specific to 'NVMe' and 'eMMC' SSD media (which do NOT use the simple /sda /sdb /sdc for path), as this appear to be a common feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447282 Title: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/1447282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447282] Re: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs)
Output from following commands: sudo blkid swapon -s printf "x\np\n" | sudo fdisk /dev/mmcblk0 ls -l /run/systemd/generator/ cat /etc/fstab cat /etc/crypttab -- Welcome to Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) (GNU/Linux 4.4.0-17-generic x86_64) $ sudo blkid /dev/mmcblk0: PTUUID="ed15471e-2ed3-4d17-82f0-2b21b0922606" PTTYPE="gpt" /dev/mmcblk0p1: UUID="8F05-DBA1" TYPE="vfat" PARTLABEL="EFI System Partition" PARTUUID="3f71d0e0-4bd1-4c17-9828-63a992fc1727" /dev/mmcblk0p2: UUID="4fb05929-3546-4b7c-b4f0-34c4a721c3c3" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="ecd9e622-8db1-45a1-9b7e-0ac5d93a9a96" /dev/mmcblk0p3: UUID="5d1798c3-4e4a-4c3c-842e-e929fbeceb85" TYPE="swap" PARTUUID="0df8044d-7755-47fd-8a80-be2bbc7c87ef" $ swapon -s FilenameTypeSizeUsedPriority /dev/mmcblk0p3 partition 4046844 0 -1 $ printf "x\np\n" | sudo fdisk /dev/mmcblk0 Disk /dev/mmcblk0: 58.2 GiB, 62537072640 bytes, 122142720 sectors Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disklabel type: gpt Disk identifier: ED15471E-2ED3-4D17-82F0-2B21B0922606 First LBA: 34 Last LBA: 122142686 Alternative LBA: 122142719 Partition entries LBA: 2 Allocated partition entries: 128 Device Start End Sectors Type-UUID UUID NameAttrs /dev/mmcblk0p1 2048 1050623 1048576 C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B 3F71D0E0-4BD1-4C17-9828-63A992FC1727 EFI System Partition /dev/mmcblk0p2 1050624 114046975 112996352 0FC63DAF-8483-4772-8E79-3D69D8477DE4 ECD9E622-8DB1-45A1-9B7E-0AC5D93A9A96 /dev/mmcblk0p3 114046976 122140671 8093696 0657FD6D-A4AB-43C4-84E5-0933C84B4F4F 0DF8044D-7755-47FD-8A80-BE2BBC7C87EF $ ls -l /run/systemd/generator/ total 16 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 374 Apr 8 08:21 boot-efi.mount drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 cryptsetup.target.requires drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 dev-disk-by\x2duuid-5d1798c3\x2d4e4a\x2d4c3c\x2d842e\x2de929fbeceb85.device.wants drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 dev-mapper-cryptswap1.device.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 dev-mapper-cryptswap1.device.requires -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 188 Apr 8 08:21 dev-mapper-cryptswap1.swap drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 hwclock.service.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Apr 8 08:21 local-fs.target.requires drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 local-fs.target.wants -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 277 Apr 8 08:21 -.mount drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 multi-user.target.wants drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 networking.service.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 remote-fs.target.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 sendsigs.service.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 swap.target.requires -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 947 Apr 8 08:21 systemd-cryptsetup@cryptswap1.service drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 umountfs.service.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Apr 8 08:21 umountnfs.service.d $ cat /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a # device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices # that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5). # # # / was on /dev/mmcblk0p2 during installation UUID=4fb05929-3546-4b7c-b4f0-34c4a721c3c3 / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1 # /boot/efi was on /dev/mmcblk0p1 during installation UUID=8F05-DBA1 /boot/efi vfatumask=0077 0 1 # swap was on /dev/mmcblk0p3 during installation #UUID=5d1798c3-4e4a-4c3c-842e-e929fbeceb85 noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/mapper/cryptswap1 none swap sw 0 0 $ cat /etc/crypttab cryptswap1 UUID=5d1798c3-4e4a-4c3c-842e-e929fbeceb85 /dev/urandom swap,offset=1024,cipher=aes-xts-plain64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447282 Title: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/1447282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447282] Re: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs)
Re-tested today with 16.04 LTS (xenial-desktop-amd64, daily-build, 07-Apr), and still occurring. I have an HP Stream 11 Pro G2 notebook with 64GB eMMC (SSD) storage, and existing partitions were deleted. Minor issue: Notebook stalled with 'sda' (USB used for install) cache /pass-thru error, after it prompted that install was complete. This error may have previously occurred (earlier attempts, and during install/load), but did not stop for me to read wording. This did NOT pause (for at command line) doing update/upgrade. However, only a limited number of updates were available. -- I think this specifically relates to 'NVMe' and 'eMMC' SSD media, as this appear to be common feature for those reporting recent issues. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447282 Title: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/1447282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447282] Re: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs)
Details from /etc/fstab and /etc/crypttab :: $ cat /etc/fstab # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a # device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices # that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5). # # # / was on /dev/mmcblk0p2 during installation UUID=040427a5-f2c1-481a-8cfc-6e9667f94855 / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1 # /boot/efi was on /dev/mmcblk0p1 during installation UUID=8F05-DBA1 /boot/efi vfatumask=0077 0 1 # swap was on /dev/mmcblk0p3 during installation #UUID=5d1798c3-4e4a-4c3c-842e-e929fbeceb85 noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/mapper/cryptswap1 none swap sw 0 0 $ cat /etc/crypttab cryptswap1 UUID=5d1798c3-4e4a-4c3c-842e-e929fbeceb85 /dev/urandom swap,offset=1024,cipher=aes-xts-plain64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447282 Title: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/1447282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447282] Re: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs)
Output from following commands: sudo blkid swapon -s printf "x\np\n" | sudo fdisk /dev/sda ls -l /run/systemd/generator/ -- Welcome to Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) (GNU/Linux 4.4.0-16-generic x86_64) $ sudo blkid /dev/mmcblk0: PTUUID="964e28b5-d6c2-47c6-badd-de7725281f53" PTTYPE="gpt" /dev/mmcblk0p1: UUID="8F05-DBA1" TYPE="vfat" PARTLABEL="EFI System Partition" PARTUUID="f13ded99-6623-4642-9319-5c7da84f93b4" /dev/mmcblk0p2: UUID="040427a5-f2c1-481a-8cfc-6e9667f94855" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="3b78057b-58b5-449f-9607-ba173cd7f438" /dev/mmcblk0p3: UUID="5d1798c3-4e4a-4c3c-842e-e929fbeceb85" TYPE="swap" PARTUUID="ae598300-c995-4ffb-a8f6-48a7758015ae" $ swapon -s FilenameTypeSizeUsedPriority /dev/mmcblk0p3 partition 4046844 0 -1 $ printf "x\np\n" | sudo fdisk /dev/sda fdisk: cannot open /dev/sda: No such file or directory $ printf "x\np\n" | sudo fdisk /dev/sdb fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdb: No such file or directory $ printf "x\np\n" | sudo fdisk /dev/sdc fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdc: No such file or directory $ ls -l /run/systemd/generator/ total 16 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 374 Mar 31 13:47 boot-efi.mount drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 cryptsetup.target.requires drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 dev-disk-by\x2duuid-5d1798c3\x2d4e4a\x2d4c3c\x2d842e\x2de929fbeceb85.device.wants drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 dev-mapper-cryptswap1.device.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 dev-mapper-cryptswap1.device.requires -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 188 Mar 31 13:47 dev-mapper-cryptswap1.swap drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 hwclock.service.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Mar 31 13:47 local-fs.target.requires drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 local-fs.target.wants -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 277 Mar 31 13:47 -.mount drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 multi-user.target.wants drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 networking.service.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 remote-fs.target.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 sendsigs.service.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 swap.target.requires -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 947 Mar 31 13:47 systemd-cryptsetup@cryptswap1.service drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 umountfs.service.d drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 31 13:47 umountnfs.service.d $ printf "x\np\n" | sudo fdisk /dev/mmcblk0 Disk /dev/mmcblk0: 58.2 GiB, 62537072640 bytes, 122142720 sectors Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disklabel type: gpt Disk identifier: 964E28B5-D6C2-47C6-BADD-DE7725281F53 First LBA: 34 Last LBA: 122142686 Alternative LBA: 122142719 Partition entries LBA: 2 Allocated partition entries: 128 Device Start End Sectors Type-UUID UUID NameAttrs /dev/mmcblk0p1 2048 1050623 1048576 C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B F13DED99-6623-4642-9319-5C7DA84F93B4 EFI System Partition /dev/mmcblk0p2 1050624 114046975 112996352 0FC63DAF-8483-4772-8E79-3D69D8477DE4 3B78057B-58B5-449F-9607-BA173CD7F438 /dev/mmcblk0p3 114046976 122140671 8093696 0657FD6D-A4AB-43C4-84E5-0933C84B4F4F AE598300-C995-4FFB-A8F6-48A7758015AE -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447282 Title: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/1447282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447282] Re: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs)
Sorry, been busy with work. -- Re-tested today, with 16.04 LTS beta2, and still occurring. Also repeatedly stop for at command line, doing update/upgrade. I have an HP notebook with 64GB eMMC (SSD) storage, and existing partitions were already deleted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447282 Title: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/1447282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447282] Re: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs)
Re-tested with latest daily (07-Mar), and still occurring. Also issue at command line, doing update, with halt for 'enter password' occurs several times. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447282 Title: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/1447282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
Unable to re-produce. Laptop had latest install of Win 10 Pro '1511', and I was installing 'beta' Xerus. Erased ALL drive partitions, and re-installed. Did NOT recur. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447282] Re: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs)
This issue is present for current daily ISO for 16.04 LTS (Xenial Xerus). Will test further .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447282 Title: Does not use encrypted swap when using GPT partitioning + encrypted home directory (ecryptfs) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/1447282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
This issue is present for current daily ISO for 16.04 LTS (Xenial Xerus). Will test further .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1333140] Re: Fix udev rules to consider mmc rpmb partitions
I have done repeated installs of 14.04 LTS and 15.04 on an HP Stream 11 notebooks. This issue generally does NOT occur, other than briefly during initial load of Ubuntu installer (and sometimes during early stages of install). This adds no more than 15% to the time it takes to install Ubuntu (with eMMC storage), and will usually take less than 30 minutes. However, I realised recently that this was ONLY true for new machines, or those I had already installed Ubuntu on. Out of the box, I was interrupting initial startup (at screen backlight on) to go directly to (BIOS controls for) booting from USB device. For machines that had were already running Windows 8.1 (or even just asking for region / user details), it will no longer cleanly install Ubuntu. I have had it take from 2 hours to 5-7 hours, or just stall (after about 40 minutes) with continuous errors. This appears to be spurious interrupts (which cause further errors) due to attempts to access the RPMB partition. I am NOT even convinced that the Ubuntu installer is causing these interrupts. The other possible 'root cause' is that the problem machines (NEW or used) were older, the same model Notebook but with an earlier generation / step release of eMMC chips. I don't have a large enough pool to prove this, but someone may be able to shed light. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1333140 Title: Fix udev rules to consider mmc rpmb partitions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1333140/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1379524] Re: 14e4:4365 Weak wifi signal
Does the Broadcom BCM43142 802.11b/g/n [14e4:4365] chipset support 5GHz ? Currently only 2.4GHz visible, for 'HP Stream 11 Pro' on Ubuntu 15.04 (Vivid) 64-bit (fully updated). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379524 Title: 14e4:4365 Weak wifi signal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1379524/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1379524] Re: 14e4:4365 Weak wifi signal
Should this be marked as duplicate of: #1415880 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379524 Title: 14e4:4365 Weak wifi signal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1379524/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1379524] Re: 14e4:4365 Weak wifi signal
Solution for Broadcom BCM43142 'Bluetooth firmware not loaded': http://askubuntu.com/questions/547552/bluetooth-not-working-on-14-10 -with-bcm43142 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379524 Title: 14e4:4365 Weak wifi signal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1379524/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
This occurred again today. Aborted from 14.10 (fully updated) after 'prompt to upgrade to vivid', which looked like it would take forever. Restarted Notebook, to install 15.04 using USB of 'Ubuntu 15.04 Desktop (64-bit)' (release). When prompted with 'non-UEFI' mode warning, I choose 'back' and removed ALL existing partitions, then powered off. Then re-ran, with NO repeat of issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1379524] Re: 14e4:4365 Weak wifi signal
FYI: Same issues (Weak WiFi signal, Bluetooth missing firmware) for BCM3142 802.11b/g/n [14e4:4365] on 'HP Stream 11 Pro' on Ubuntu 15.04 (Vivid) fully updated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379524 Title: 14e4:4365 Weak wifi signal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1379524/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1379524] Re: 14e4:4365 Weak wifi signal
Sorry, correction: 'BCM43142' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379524 Title: 14e4:4365 Weak wifi signal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1379524/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
Attempting to install Vivid (15.04) Daily Build, on HP Stream 11 (as above). Device had earlier (failed) attempt to install 15.04 64-bit present (standard auto-install: system, swap; but missing EFI), and Secure-Boot mode is enabled. http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/daily-live/pending/ vivid-desktop-amd64.iso 21-Apr-2015 08:34 Install halts (after choosing erase disk, and accepting auto-install for: system, swap, and esp partitions) with warning dialog: The attempt to mount a file system with type vfat in MMC/SD card #1, partition #1 (mmcblk0p1) at /boot/efi failed. You may resume partitioning from the partition menu. Go Back/Continue -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
Either option does nothing, and dialog is ignored by installer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
Repeat of above, but with device has blank 32GB eMMC storage. Chose to 'Erase disk and install Ubuntu', to create ESP, ext4, and swap .. Appears to be installing .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
Summary: Install appears to complete, and prompts for reboot; (identical behaviour as 14.10 install) - reboot pauses, device still power-on but screen blank (no backlight); (often occurs with 14.10 install, on HP Stream 11) - then prompts to remove any install media, and press Enter .. - However, screen is unstable with three 'Ubuntu' images overlayed, and other screen corruption / tearing / flicker .. - force power off, wait 5, power on. (boots normally) However. still prompts with: Please enter passphrase for disk cryptswap1 on none! (seen earlier) Pressing Enter gets through to normal login .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
On next reboot, requires pressing Enter Enter to get through to normal login. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
Attempting to install Vivid (15.04) Daily Build, on HP Stream 11 (Bay Trail notebook, with 32GB eMMC storage). Device already has 14.10 64-bit present (standard auto-install: EFI, system, swap), and Secure-Boot mode is enabled. http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/daily-live/pending/ vivid-desktop-amd64.iso 17-Apr-2015 08:38 - Installed using 4GB USB drive, with UEFI-only image; (.ISO file 'restored' to USB drive, no SysLinux or MBR) - Installer incorrectly prompts with warning that the install target contains an existing BIOS-mode install, and that Legacy-mode is enabled; (prompts with option to continue in 'UEFI' mode) - install appears to complete, and prompts for reboot; (identical behaviour as 14.10 install) - reboot stops, device still power-on but screen blank (no backlight); (often occurs with 14.10 install, on HP Stream 11) - force off, wait 5, power on. (boots normally) However. now prompts with: Please enter passphrase for disk cryptswap1 on none! (new behaviour !?) Pressing Enter Enter gets through to normal login .. CONCLUSION: - primary issue may now be 'fixed'; - the 'force-UEFI' dialog/prompt is still an issue; (separate bug?) - prompt for passphrase is well .. ODD. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
@Paulo This may relate to @Thomas stating Installed in UEFI Mode, Secure boot off. I've seen a number of sites trying to install on various ultra-books and tablets all say must disable secure boot. As this is a component of proper use of UEFI (which should work), I have left it enabled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
I hope not, because it isn't fixed yet .. The freeze was around 6 hours ago, and that build is nearly a day old. ( Here is Australia it is already mid-afternoon of Apr-17. ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
Or using the EFI partition (on USB flash), in place of creating EFI partition on target .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
There is also an issue with installer creating the EFI partition on USB flash device, instead of target platform. This is NOT obvious when default settings are used. Will need to do further tests, to see if this can still occur .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
@polochamps2004 I've tried that 'fix', but I get error message for 'grub-install' command. I need to manually create EFI partition as well .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-efi/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
Which is copied from: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2223856p=13025073#post13025073 I will try it out .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-efi/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1082418] Re: [Fujitsu Lifebook AH532] Ubuntu UEFI install locks out UEFI firmware (~bios) access
Possible workaround, for 14.10 .. Quick press 'Power' button, and immediately start repeatedly pressing Esc ... (Don't just press and hold.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082418 Title: [Fujitsu Lifebook AH532] Ubuntu UEFI install locks out UEFI firmware (~bios) access To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1082418/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
Attempting to install Vivid (15.04) Daily Build, on HP Stream 11 (Bay Trail notebook, with eMMC storage): - Installed using USB drive, with UEFI-only image; (.ISO file 'restored' to USB drive, no SysLinux or MBR) - Installer incorrectly concludes that the drive contains an existing BIOS-mode install, and that Legacy-mode is enabled; (prompts to 'Force UEFI' mode) - install appears to complete, but will NOT boot. (Even on restart, not recognised as (UEFI) bootable) I have verified that (a.) the drive is NOT blank, and had contained 14.10 64-bit; and (b.) Secure-Boot mode is enabled (and Legacy disabled). CONCLUSION: This is more like the logic being REVERSED, than the original description of the issue (in 'Bug Description'). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-efi/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
For latest Vivid (daily build), it also suggests I have 'Secure Boot' disabled, and it needs to force 'UEFI mode'. This is part of the same issue, and also results in NO Grub being installed (so wont boot). Live works fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-efi/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1333140] Re: Fix udev rules to consider mmc rpmb partitions
A fix is great, however .. I am unable to install Ubuntu 14.04 LTS on the HP Stream 11, due to this bug. The fix/update would fix this, but I would need to add it to the install image. I can install Ubuntu 14.10 on the HP Stream 11, but it is slow to boot (due to this bug). This update is not yet released for Utopic (14.10), and may not soon either given the current focus on release of 15.04 .. Considering raising new BUG (for Utopic, Velvet). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1333140 Title: Fix udev rules to consider mmc rpmb partitions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1333140/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 288762] Re: totem: can't skip chapters in matroska files
This issue is still present in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, fully updated. An .mkv file with OR without chapters is treated the same by Totem. Most of my files played on VLC (or other player) have chpater information and you can navigate to next/previous chapter. What is the root cause? Why did this fix (xine-lib v1.1.17, per comment #11) never reach/affect Trusty (14.04)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288762 Title: totem: can't skip chapters in matroska files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer0.10/+bug/288762/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1189721] Re: Ralink RT3290 doesn't have a bluetooth driver
Dan, The suggested fix in Comment 129 (Adnan's answer, on AskUbuntu) does work for Ubuntu 14.10; but requires his suggested changes to two source files (before compiling). It did NOT require step 7, or any additional files/binary code. HP 250 G3 (15.6, Celeron), Ubuntu 14.10 (64-bit), Ralink RT3290. What drivers did you try? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1189721 Title: Ralink RT3290 doesn't have a bluetooth driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1189721/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314367] Re: Flickering with Ubuntu 14.04 and nvidia card reappeared
Compiz works for me: (Force full screen redraws (buffer swap) on repaint [x]) Ubuntu 14.04 fully updated Quadro K420/PCIe/SSE2 Needed to switch from Nouveau (to edgers Nvidia 340.58) to resolved DisplayPort not handling screen saver / blanking, and poor performance (or X server crash) with DVI (Dual Link). I have just upgraded to a Samsung 27 with 2560 x 1440 resolution. The K420 video card was also required, as earlier cards (NSA 310, NVS 315) could not keep up with higher resolution. Tearing and remnants on full screen video or larger scaling of some applications. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314367 Title: Flickering with Ubuntu 14.04 and nvidia card reappeared To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1314367/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1313539] Re: monitor shows black screen and no input signal after turning the monitor off and on manually
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1308105 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308105 This issue is possibly specific to DisplayPort, and not just a duplicate of bug #1308105. I have just upgraded my monitor, and due to higher screen resolution, was forced to change from DVI (and a KVM) to DisplayPort. The monitor will NOT sleep, and attempting to workaround by power-off/on (when unneeded) hits THIS bug. Setting the monitor to sleep (eg. powersave timer) also triggers THIS bug. The ONLY fix being to power cycle the PC. However, the most common workaround I have found generally says: Don't use DisplayPort, use DVI Dual-Link. ALSO, if bug 1308105 is the cause, where is the fix? When will it arrive? This appears to be a xfce4 regression bug, and specific to DisplayPort .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313539 Title: monitor shows black screen and no input signal after turning the monitor off and on manually To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-settings/+bug/1313539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292041] Re: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen
I am running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (64-bit), fully updated. Unity version is: 7.2.3+14.04.20140826-0ubuntu1 I just changed monitors, and also from DVI to DisplayPort (due to higher resolution). The screen does not 'turn off', after screen locked (or timeout). Screen is black (with white mouse cursor), but still fully backlit. This does not change after many hours. This may not be the SAME bug (as original post), but has identical symptoms. NEW BUG ? Any advice / suggestions ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041 Title: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1292041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251983] Re: Ubuntu 13.10 disconnects randomly
Looks more like a PPTP issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251983 Title: Ubuntu 13.10 disconnects randomly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1251983/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574886] Re: Apt has strange network errors when updating indexes.
Same issued just occured under 13.04 (raring), for Australia. This appears to be a DNS collision issue .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574886 Title: Apt has strange network errors when updating indexes. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/574886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574886] Re: Apt has strange network errors when updating indexes.
Disregard. Caused by medibuntu.org (no DNS record), due to no longer being maintained. See: https://launchpad.net/medibuntu/+announcement/11219 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574886 Title: Apt has strange network errors when updating indexes. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/574886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1171578] Re: Unable to Play DVD's in Ubuntu 13.04
Verified in 13.04 (64-bit) fully updated as of 12th July. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171578 Title: Unable to Play DVD's in Ubuntu 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer0.10/+bug/1171578/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 940825] Re: apt-get update reporting not acceptable
Currently getting same issue for AU (Australian) mirror, but only affecting (for me) Ubunut 'server'. Error: W: Failed to fetch http://au.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise- updates/universe/source/Sources 406 Not Acceptable -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940825 Title: apt-get update reporting not acceptable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/940825/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332646] Re: sftp does not set timestamps
This was partially fixed in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (desktop). Puch / Puill: If you copy from a remote Ubuntu platform, then the timestamp is preserved. But if you copy too, then only some platforms honour the timestamp (otherwise it is set to 'now' by the receiving platform). Tested today with full patched Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS desktop, server, and Ubuntu 13.04 desktop (all 64-bit): - Copying from 13.04 desktop to 12.04 desktop ( Ok ) - Copying from 13.04 desktop to 12.04 server ( timestamp replaced, with 'now' ) - Copying from 12.04 desktop to 13.04 desktop ( Ok ) - Copying from 12.04 desktop to 12.04 server ( Ok, but new directories have timestamp of 'now' ) This should be fixed, and be consistent. Either as default behaviour, or from SFTP config. file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332646 Title: sftp does not set timestamps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/332646/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332646] Re: sftp does not set timestamps
Repeated testing using Nautilus, and SFTP to server. Does NOT honour timestamp, for files or directories. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332646 Title: sftp does not set timestamps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/332646/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332646] Re: sftp does not set timestamps
Able to resolve, using 'scp -rp' at command line. Unable to resolve from any GUI app, that (in theory) uses SCP or SFTP. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332646 Title: sftp does not set timestamps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/332646/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1179553] Re: fglrx 2:9.000-0ubuntu3: fglrx kernel module failed to build
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 859101 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859101 This affect Ubunut 12.04 (precise), 12.10, and 13.04 (raring). It is unliley to be a duplicate of Bug 859101 (which was on 11.10 back in Sep 2011). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1179553 Title: fglrx 2:9.000-0ubuntu3: fglrx kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/1179553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107957] Re: npconfig crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash()
This is very similar to Bug #931 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107957 Title: npconfig crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/1107957/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1111931] Re: [raring] nspluginwrapper installation finishes with Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Any safe workaround, temporary measure? Remove 'gecko-mediaplayer' ? Diable flash / media in Firefox ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931 Title: [raring] nspluginwrapper installation finishes with Segmentation fault (core dumped) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1105417] Re: npconfig crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_equal()
Confirming previous post. Issue with Ubunut 13.04 64-bit, latest updates. No specific cause / install / update yet identified. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1105417 Title: npconfig crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_equal() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/1105417/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107957] Re: npconfig crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash()
Similar to Bug #1105417. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107957 Title: npconfig crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/1107957/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176844] Re: ntpdate fails to get a server from /etc/ntp.conf
I may yet open a new bug, but in the meantime some comments .. ntpdate fails to get a server from /etc/ntp.conf YES. In my testing (Ubuntu 12.10, server, 64bit), ntpdate does NOT use the NTP servers listed in /etc/ntp.conf. Therefore, not honouring the setting: NTPDATE_USE_NTP_CONF=yes in file: /etc/default/ntpdate However, NTP and NTPDATE don't play well, and really only NTP needs to work once the system is running (and 'nearly' synced). You also need to stop/start NTP, before/after attempting to use NTPDATE: ntpq -np ntpq -c rl sudo service ntp stop ntpdate -q 1.au.pool.ntp.org sudo service ntp start ntpq -np ntpq -c rl And (surprise) NTPDATE uses a completely different file (/etc/ntp/step-tickers) to list time servers, to get the initial reasonable time sync, to allow NTP to then keep in sync. Note: Ubuntu (even 12.10) does not have this file, or even the directory (/etc/ntp/), but does appear to use it (if created). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176844 Title: ntpdate fails to get a server from /etc/ntp.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/176844/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 176844] Re: ntpdate fails to get a server from /etc/ntp.conf
I may yet open a new bug, but in the meantime some comments .. ntpdate fails to get a server from /etc/ntp.conf YES. In my testing (Ubuntu 12.10, server, 64bit), ntpdate does NOT use the NTP servers listed in /etc/ntp.conf. Therefore, not honouring the setting: NTPDATE_USE_NTP_CONF=yes in file: /etc/default/ntpdate However, NTP and NTPDATE don't play well, and really only NTP needs to work once the system is running (and 'nearly' synced). You also need to stop/start NTP, before/after attempting to use NTPDATE: ntpq -np ntpq -c rl sudo service ntp stop ntpdate -q 1.au.pool.ntp.org sudo service ntp start ntpq -np ntpq -c rl And (surprise) NTPDATE uses a completely different file (/etc/ntp/step-tickers) to list time servers, to get the initial reasonable time sync, to allow NTP to then keep in sync. Note: Ubuntu (even 12.10) does not have this file, or even the directory (/etc/ntp/), but does appear to use it (if created). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176844 Title: ntpdate fails to get a server from /etc/ntp.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/176844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1091663] Re: 3G is non-functional on 32GB+3G Nexus 7
@James Brierley, I suggest you use SSH over WiFi. You don;t need an 'OTG' USB cable, and you just use the keyboard / mouse on your PC. at Nexus 7 (Ubuntu) terminal: ifconfig (note the IP address, for wireless) sudo apt-get install openssh-server Then connect from Ubunut PC. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091663 Title: 3G is non-functional on 32GB+3G Nexus 7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-nexus7/+bug/1091663/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254375] Re: SIGSEGV in ntpq
Can this be assigned a higher priority, to resolve? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254375 Title: SIGSEGV in ntpq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/254375/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 254375] Re: SIGSEGV in ntpq
I still get this error on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (latest updates), under 'cold start' conditions. For example: (new host), install ntp (sudo apt-get install ntp) ~$ ntpq -c rl (on a different host) associd=0 status=c011 leap_alarm, sync_unspec, 1 event, freq_not_set, version=ntpd 4.2.6p2@1.2194 Fri Sep 2 18:37:15 UTC 2011 (1), processor=i686, system=Linux/3.0.0-12-generic-pae, leap=11, stratum=16, precision=-20, rootdelay=0.000, rootdisp=0.420, refid=INIT, reftime=. Thu, Feb 7 2036 19:28:16.000, clock=d26c2106.4ae705a8 Tue, Nov 15 2011 12:21:42.292, peer=0, tc=3, mintc=3, offset=0.000, frequency=0.000, sys_jitter=0.000, clk_jitter=0.001, clk_wander=0.000 sometime after install, BUT before it is properly synced, I may get: ~$ ntpq -c rl assID=0 status=c644 sync_alarm, sync_ntp, 4 events, event_peer/strat_chg, version=ntpd 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o Tue Apr 19 07:08:29 UTC 2011 (1), processor=i686, system=Linux/2.6.32-34-generic, leap=11, stratum=16, Segmentation fault later still, when properly synced, it returns valid data: ~$ ntpq -c rl assID=0 status=0664 leap_none, sync_ntp, 6 events, event_peer/strat_chg, version=ntpd 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o Tue Apr 19 07:08:29 UTC 2011 (1), processor=i686, system=Linux/2.6.32-34-generic, leap=00, stratum=3, precision=-20, rootdelay=303.768, rootdispersion=75.598, peer=65450, refid=91.189.94.4, reftime=d26c181d.ef314855 Tue, Nov 15 2011 11:43:41.934, poll=6, clock=d26c187f.d8e7310b Tue, Nov 15 2011 11:45:19.847, state=4, offset=21.891, frequency=86.577, jitter=24.303, noise=46.878, stability=25.729, tai=0 This must relate to string-space, a negative value (unexpected), or similar for nonsense data. Does not ALWAYS occur, and HARD to reproduce .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254375 Title: SIGSEGV in ntpq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/254375/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 254375] Re: SIGSEGV in ntpq
I still get this error on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (latest updates), under 'cold start' conditions. For example: (new host), install ntp (sudo apt-get install ntp) ~$ ntpq -c rl (on a different host) associd=0 status=c011 leap_alarm, sync_unspec, 1 event, freq_not_set, version=ntpd 4.2.6p2@1.2194 Fri Sep 2 18:37:15 UTC 2011 (1), processor=i686, system=Linux/3.0.0-12-generic-pae, leap=11, stratum=16, precision=-20, rootdelay=0.000, rootdisp=0.420, refid=INIT, reftime=. Thu, Feb 7 2036 19:28:16.000, clock=d26c2106.4ae705a8 Tue, Nov 15 2011 12:21:42.292, peer=0, tc=3, mintc=3, offset=0.000, frequency=0.000, sys_jitter=0.000, clk_jitter=0.001, clk_wander=0.000 sometime after install, BUT before it is properly synced, I may get: ~$ ntpq -c rl assID=0 status=c644 sync_alarm, sync_ntp, 4 events, event_peer/strat_chg, version=ntpd 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o Tue Apr 19 07:08:29 UTC 2011 (1), processor=i686, system=Linux/2.6.32-34-generic, leap=11, stratum=16, Segmentation fault later still, when properly synced, it returns valid data: ~$ ntpq -c rl assID=0 status=0664 leap_none, sync_ntp, 6 events, event_peer/strat_chg, version=ntpd 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o Tue Apr 19 07:08:29 UTC 2011 (1), processor=i686, system=Linux/2.6.32-34-generic, leap=00, stratum=3, precision=-20, rootdelay=303.768, rootdispersion=75.598, peer=65450, refid=91.189.94.4, reftime=d26c181d.ef314855 Tue, Nov 15 2011 11:43:41.934, poll=6, clock=d26c187f.d8e7310b Tue, Nov 15 2011 11:45:19.847, state=4, offset=21.891, frequency=86.577, jitter=24.303, noise=46.878, stability=25.729, tai=0 This must relate to string-space, a negative value (unexpected), or similar for nonsense data. Does not ALWAYS occur, and HARD to reproduce .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254375 Title: SIGSEGV in ntpq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/254375/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254375] Re: SIGSEGV in ntpq
Can this be assigned a higher priority, to resolve? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254375 Title: SIGSEGV in ntpq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/254375/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882893] Re: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit
Andres, please update 'bug affects you'. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882893 Title: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/882893/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882893] Re: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit
WORK AROUND (remove the package) ~: [b] sudo apt-get remove gnome-screensaver[/] ~: [b]sudo apt-get install xscreensaver xscreensaver-gl-extra xscreensaver-data-extra[/b] After installing, go to ‘Control – Startup Applications’ Then click ‘Add’ and type the entry below: Name: Xscreensaver Command: xscreensaver –nosplash Finally click ‘Add’ When finish, open ‘Dash’ and search for xscreensaver. Open it and customize it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882893 Title: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/882893/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574673] Re: Startup Disk Creator failing to create bootable USB with Ubuntu 10.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 458482 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458482 bump -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574673 Title: Startup Disk Creator failing to create bootable USB with Ubuntu 10.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/574673/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 869840] Re: compizconfig-settings makes Unity desktop unusable
Bug #869840, Comment #9 very useful. THANKS. Should there be separation of Unity and Unity-2D settings in CompizConfig Settings Manager (CCSM) ? ( YES, I know this cross-control is needed for Commnet #9 fix, and have used it. ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869840 Title: compizconfig-settings makes Unity desktop unusable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compizconfig-settings-manager/+bug/869840/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 805087] Re: Dash and launcher appear underneath windows
Unknown what causes this, appears to occur randomly. Not associated with Wine. ** Attachment added: screen, before issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/805087/+attachment/2579495/+files/Bug%20%23805087%20a.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805087 Title: Dash and launcher appear underneath windows To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/805087/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 805087] Re: Dash and launcher appear underneath windows
** Attachment added: screen, with issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/805087/+attachment/2579496/+files/Bug%20%23805087%20b.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805087 Title: Dash and launcher appear underneath windows To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/805087/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882893] Re: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit
Discussed elsewhere: http://earlruby.org/2011/10/work-around-for-a-locked-up-gnome-3-screen- saver-in-ubuntu-11-10/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882893 Title: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/882893/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882893] Re: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit
Previously noted, for Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic) http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10279527 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882893 Title: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/882893/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 842801] Re: gnome-screensaver crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
May be related to: Bug #882893 Some graphic cards do not like Screen-Off (used by screensaver), and CRASH .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842801 Title: gnome-screensaver crashed with signal 5 in _XError() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/842801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756374] Re: the screensaver locks after I try to get out of it by moving the mouse or typing the keys
Similar to Bug #882893, which is for Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric). Some (older) graphic cards do not like Screen-Off (used by Gnome Screensaver), and CRASH .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756374 Title: the screensaver locks after I try to get out of it by moving the mouse or typing the keys To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/756374/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 727594] Re: SRU: [i915gm] GPU lockup (ESR: 0x00000001 IPEHR: 0x02000004)
I am dealing with an issue (Bug #882893 ) that may be related. In general the PC (with Intel 82865G) is running OK, with Ubuntu 11.10 + Unity-2D, and latest updates. Only problem: GPU (or CPU) crashes at 'screen OFF', on screensaver timeout. ( I will try: RevertingIntelDriverTo2.4 ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727594 Title: SRU: [i915gm] GPU lockup (ESR: 0x0001 IPEHR: 0x0204) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/727594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882893] Re: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit
This may or may not be related to: Bug #727594 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882893 Title: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/882893/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882893] Re: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit
This could be an issue with the Intel 82865G integrated graphics driver. I have tried the older Intel 2.4 Driver. RevertingIntelDriverTo2.4 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReinhardTartler/X/RevertingIntelDriverTo2.4 ( Does NOT work, missing details and valid PPA sources .. ) Instead I used: Downgraded versions of X.org drivers, libraries, etc. for Ubuntu. https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-retro Click on: 'View package details' Click on: 'xserver-xorg-video-intel-2.4 - 2:2.4.1-1ubuntu11~ppa1' (near bottom) Download: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-retro/+files/xserver-xorg-video-intel-2.4_2.4.1-1ubuntu11%7Eppa1_i386.deb Then installed using: Ctrl-Alt-F1, for text login cd Downloads/ (location of .deb file) sudo dpkg -i xserver-xorg-video-intel-2.4_2.4.1-1ubuntu11~ppa1_i386.deb (enter password) sudo apt-get -f install (re-start PC) THIS DID NOT APPEAR TO FIX PROBLEM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882893 Title: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/882893/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882893] [NEW] gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit
Public bug reported: On older PC (Intel P4 2.8GHz, 1GB RAM), I am seeing this lockup with default settings. Ubuntu 11.10, Unity-2D, latest patch/updates loaded. Occurs when I wait for timeout, and screen blanks. Does NOT occur when select screen-lock (from GUI, or keyboard) I have now two separate PCs, with identical results. Note: login screen (lightdm) is not susceptible to this issue. ** Affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882893 Title: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/882893/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882893] Re: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit
This may be similar to, or a recurrence of, Bug #778953 . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882893 Title: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/882893/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778953] Re: gnome-screensaver 2.30.2-0ubuntu2 failed to exit
Created Bug #882893 instead. This identifies that this is for Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric) and Unity-2D. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778953 Title: gnome-screensaver 2.30.2-0ubuntu2 failed to exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/778953/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882893] Re: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit
This can be defeated once, by pressing 'shift' key to wakeup. This works once (after boot time), and does NOT work a second time (after subsequent timeout). When PC is in lockout state, only power-off is possible. I have loaded SSH server, and machine is also non-responsive to connect attempt (over SSH). ** Tags added: 11.10 screensaver ui unity-2d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882893 Title: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 failed to exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/882893/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778953] Re: gnome-screensaver 2.30.2-0ubuntu2 failed to exit
I'm still seeing this behavior in Ubuntu 11.10 That is, for package: gnome-screensaver 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778953 Title: gnome-screensaver 2.30.2-0ubuntu2 failed to exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/778953/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778953] Re: gnome-screensaver 2.30.2-0ubuntu2 failed to exit
On older PC (Intel P4 2.8GHz, 1GB ram), I am seeing this lockup with default settings. Ubuntu 11.10, Unity-2D, latest patch/updates loaded. Note: login screen (lightdm) is not susceptible to this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778953 Title: gnome-screensaver 2.30.2-0ubuntu2 failed to exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/778953/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574673] Re: Startup Disk Creator failing to create bootable USB with Ubuntu 10.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 458482 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458482 This is NOT duplicate of Bug #458482 This is a regression issue, introduced at/around: Ubuntu 10.10 This is a Syslinux issue, not a boot issue (per se). It is not always possible to boot and install Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (desktop OR server), when the USB media has been created on Ubuntu 10.10 (or later) using Startup Disk Creator. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MaverickMeerkat/ReleaseNotes#Common%20Desktop%20Applications .. It is not possible to create Ubuntu 10.04 USB disks from the Startup Disk Creator in Ubuntu 10.10 due to a backwards incompatibility in the syslinux program. NOTE: I am able to re-produced this issue, in the last 2 days, for Ubuntu 11.10 + Unity, with latest patch/updates. WORKAROUND: (works for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server desktop) http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-mint-84/trying-to-boot-linux-mint-9-from-usb-flash-drive-vesamenu-c32-not-a-com32r-image-829397/#post4120867 Attempt to boot, either auto OR selecting USB from boot menu When this SYSLINUX error message appears: eg. vesamenu.c32: Not a COM32R image boot: Type help Enter, then press Enter again. ( after several seconds, GUI demo/install menu appears ) Has there been any attempt to fix this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574673 Title: Startup Disk Creator failing to create bootable USB with Ubuntu 10.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/574673/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 838404] Re: opening existing file with gksu gedit creates untitled document
Does this mean (based on Bug #805682) we should: (a.) henceforth use sudo gedit systemfile (with some security issues) OR, (b.) agitate for this to be fixed, and soon. ?? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838404 Title: opening existing file with gksu gedit creates untitled document To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gedit/+bug/838404/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 796076] Re: When run as root [gksudo gedit whatever] gedit tries to open a 2nd 'untitled document 1'
see also: Bug #838404 (more or less) a duplicate of this bug. Bug #805682 Underlying issues with Nautilus and gksudu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796076 Title: When run as root [gksudo gedit whatever] gedit tries to open a 2nd 'untitled document 1' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gedit/+bug/796076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446216] Re: add-apt-repository should have an option to remove ppa from sources.list
NOTE: Erroneously prompts with '.. about to ADD the following ..', which you can safely ignore. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446216 Title: add-apt-repository should have an option to remove ppa from sources.list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/software-properties/+bug/446216/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 738462] Re: Nautilus not preserving timestamps (Lucid)
per #2 * Is this reproducible? YES * If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug This affects ANY attempt to transfer files (using Nautilus 2.30.1) between two hosts with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS on both, or from 10.04 LTS to 10.10 I have noted this on a number of occasions, on different hardware at multiples locations. I have worked around this, using backup tools or other methods. (as noted): This does NOT occur when using Ubuntu 10.10 to transfer from !0.04 LTS . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738462 Title: Nautilus not preserving timestamps (Lucid) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 738462] Re: Nautilus not preserving timestamps (Lucid)
per #3 is that a local issue? This appears to be general for 10.04 LTS is the issue solved in recent versions? NO, not yet resolved by latest updates to 10.04 LTS (YES, solved in Ubuntu 10.10 or later, which now use Nautilus 2.23.0 ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738462 Title: Nautilus not preserving timestamps (Lucid) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 738462] Re: Nautilus not preserving timestamps (Lucid)
using what protocol? did you mount those using nautilus? mounted with Nautilus, using SSH protocol My longterm workaround has been to use (VanDyke) SecureFX, either under Linux/Wine or Windows (on another/third host). Recently started using SecureCRT (Linux) in beta, which does not yet have companion: SecureFX (Linux). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738462 Title: Nautilus not preserving timestamps (Lucid) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 738462] [NEW] Nautilus not preserving timestamps (Lucid)
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 10.04.2 (Lucid), with latest updates, still uses Nautilus 2.30.1 .. If attempt to copy files using Nautilus, to another host, the date/time of files are NOT preserved. This occurred when attempting transferring of user files to a NEW PC (with fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10, w/ Nautilus 2.23.0). Workaround: Use new PC (with Ubuntu 10.10 Nautilus 2.32.0) instead, which DOES preserve date/times. NOTE: This should be fixed for currently supported LTS release (10.04). ** Affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738462 Title: Nautilus not preserving timestamps (Lucid) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 738462] Re: Nautilus not preserving timestamps (Lucid)
IMHO, Bug #215499 was not properly resolved. IMHO, Bug #319063 should have addressed this, OR been changed to next LTS release (from Intrepid). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738462 Title: Nautilus not preserving timestamps (Lucid) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 319063] Re: [intrepid] incorrect datetime on copy - remote filesystems
New bug files: Bug #738462 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319063 Title: [intrepid] incorrect datetime on copy - remote filesystems -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315552] Re: Nautilus STILL not preserving timestamps
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 319063 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319063 New bug files: Bug #738462 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315552 Title: Nautilus STILL not preserving timestamps -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 215499] Re: Nautilus not preserving timestamps
New bug files: Bug #738462 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215499 Title: Nautilus not preserving timestamps -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
