[Bug 1574266] Re: Xorg freeze [drm] stuck on render ring - gpu hanging too fast, banning
Same problem here. I rarely had this problem previously with Ubuntu 14.04, but since updated to Ubuntu 16.04 I am suffering this issue very often. The problem mainly appears when trying to resume the laptop from suspend. Mine has already installed xserver-xorg-video-intel. The laptop has an intel HD Graphics 4400 video adapter, the one integrated within the Core i7-4510U CPU $ lspci ... 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Haswell-ULT Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0b) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574266 Title: Xorg freeze [drm] stuck on render ring - gpu hanging too fast, banning To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1574266/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173941] Re: Ubuntu 13.04 doesn't start/ show login screen/ after intallation or upgrade
Same problem here. Maybe it is related someway with the graphics card: Intel Corporation 82Q963/Q965 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) My computer has been running ubuntu for the last 6 years without any problem until I updated to 13.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173941 Title: Ubuntu 13.04 doesn't start/ show login screen/ after intallation or upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1173941/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 472767] Re: Unable to print pdf files in full page scale
I have experiencing this problem with Ubuntu 12.04 and evince 3.4.0 The preview shows the correct page with no additional margins, but the final print, always scale te pageto about a 96.8% I have exactly the same problem with ePDFViewer, version 0.1.8, so I am not sure if the problem is on evince or maybe in some shared library. Right now, the only solution for me if I want to print documents with the real dimensions is to use Adobe Reader. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/472767 Title: Unable to print pdf files in full page scale To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/472767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 945450] Re: Responsiveness: LightDM in ubuntu 12.04 very slow
I have just upgraded from 10.04 to 12.04 My computer is almost unusable right now. I have to write at turtle speed. Otherwise half of the letters typed on the keyboard do not get written. I have been using this computer with Ubuntu since about 5 years ago with no issues so far until today. Hope a solution will be found soon. Otherwise I will have to revert back to a previous version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945450 Title: Responsiveness: LightDM in ubuntu 12.04 very slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-greeter/+bug/945450/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 659793] Re: xserver-xephyr: Couldn't find keyboard driver evdev
Same problem here. I am trying to setup a multiseat computer using LightDM and following this guide: http://netpatia.blogspot.com/2009/06/multiseat-in-ubuntu-904.html Tried with ephyr instead of evdev, but I am not able to launch Xephyr. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659793 Title: xserver-xephyr: Couldn't find keyboard driver evdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/659793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 710494] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-28-generic 2.6.32-28.55 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 708442 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708442 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 708442 package linux-image-2.6.32-28-generic 2.6.32-28.55 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can subscribe to bug 708442 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+bug/708442/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710494 Title: package linux-image-2.6.32-28-generic 2.6.32-28.55 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 708857] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-28-generic 2.6.32-28.55 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 708442 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708442 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 708442 package linux-image-2.6.32-28-generic 2.6.32-28.55 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can subscribe to bug 708442 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+bug/708442/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708857 Title: package linux-image-2.6.32-28-generic 2.6.32-28.55 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557150] Re: sshfs mounts read-only filesystems
That seems to be just a bug in gedit. If the backup option is checked (create a backup copy of files before saving), everything works properly. If that option is not selected, then you can save your modified file just once. Successive saving will cause the error. Link to the message of the user who detected this issue: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=9248113postcount=4 -- sshfs mounts read-only filesystems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557150] Re: sshfs mounts read-only filesystems
The bug seems to be limited to just some gnome software: I can create files (in the remote sshfs mount) with both vi and gedit, but once created I can modify the file with vi, but I am unable to modify the file with gedit (even with the backup option disabled). This bug seems to be that pointed out in this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1474841 -- sshfs mounts read-only filesystems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557150] [NEW] sshfs mounts read-only filesystems
Public bug reported: In previous versions, I was able to mount remote filesystems via sshfs with read and write permissions. In Ubuntu 10.04 remote filesystems mounted via sshfs are accessible in read-only mode. I am unable to write to the remote mounts. May be this has been reported as a Nautilus problem (see bug #548754), but it is not just nautilus, but the whole system is affected by the bug. I mean, the origin of the bug is not nautilus, but sshfs. Further information: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release:10.04 $ apt-cache policy sshfs sshfs: Instalados: 2.2-1build1 Candidato: 2.2-1build1 Tabla de versión: *** 2.2-1build1 0 500 http://es.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: sshfs 2.2-1build1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Apr 7 11:10:21 2010 ProcEnviron: LANG=es_ES.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: sshfs-fuse ** Affects: sshfs-fuse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- sshfs mounts read-only filesystems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557150] Re: sshfs mounts read-only filesystems
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43334305/Dependencies.txt -- sshfs mounts read-only filesystems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548754] Re: sshfs mounts cannot be written
I have just this problem, but I want to add some information: It is not a Nautilus problem, but a sshfs problem. If I try to make any modification on the remote filesystem, that is not possible, even from the console. Nautilus is just suffering the same problem as the rest of applications. I do not agree with the Low level assigned as importance level. In our company, we usually work on remote filesystems mounted by means of sshfs. We have just updated some computers from 8.04 to 10.04 and these are now useless for that kind of tasks. In my opinion, such kind of bug must be resolved before the final 10.04 version is out. I have observed this bug in Ubuntu 10.04 beta 1 + updates to the current date. uname: Linux 2.6.32-18-generic #27-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 26 19:51:10 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux lsb_release: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release:10.04 Codename: lucid -- sshfs mounts cannot be written https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410995] Re: zd1211 wireless chipset fails to work on Karmic Alpha 3 - Differing firmware version
Have a look at this thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1307667 I was suffering a similar problem with my wifi device (0ace:1215 ZyDAS WLA-54L WiFi), and the solution proposed in comment #6 improved things notably. -- zd1211 wireless chipset fails to work on Karmic Alpha 3 - Differing firmware version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 344252] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling defaults to Performance instead of OnDemand
Same problem here: Asus EeePC with Celeron M at 900MHz. Eight levels available (from 112MHz to 900MHz). I can choose a fixed frequency level, but I am unable to change the policy. I am not able to choose ondemand (even after doing that, the system remains in performance mode) Ubuntu 9.10, 32 bit, kernel 2.6.31-15 -- CPU Frequency Scaling defaults to Performance instead of OnDemand https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 464369] Re: Very slow boot up times (2m 30s) on Karmic 9.10 compared to 25 secs with Jaunty 9.04.
Same problem here. Tested in three different computers (one of them with SSD, the other two with HDD), and boot times are more or less 2x in all of them. I have been testing the betas and pre-releases of ubuntu 9.10. Boot times were really fast up to version alpha-5. Starting from alpha-6, boot times increased dramatically (this was the first version including changes related to upstart). I have written some additional information on a blog entry covering some aspects through the different alphas releases. You can read it here: http://ospatia.blogspot.com/2009/08/novedades-en-ubuntu-910.html The goal of upstart was to reduce boot times, but obviously there seems to be a problem and upstart is not achieving its goal. -- Very slow boot up times (2m 30s) on Karmic 9.10 compared to 25 secs with Jaunty 9.04. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 464369] Re: Very slow boot up times (2m 30s) on Karmic 9.10 compared to 25 secs with Jaunty 9.04.
I observed that this problem happens since version alpha-6, when thing related to upstart were included. ** Package changed: ubuntu = upstart (Ubuntu) -- Very slow boot up times (2m 30s) on Karmic 9.10 compared to 25 secs with Jaunty 9.04. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 467891] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:52 suspend_test_finish+0x80/0x90()
Same problem here with a rather old (2002 ~ 2003) Asus Pundit (Model P4S8L) -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:52 suspend_test_finish+0x80/0x90() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 292319] Re: SRU: nbd-client is killed during diskless client shutdown
I am also suffering the same problem. It is not a mythubuntu install, but just a standard ubuntu installation into a diskless computer. Version Karmic, with patches up to date (2.6.31-14-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 14:04:26 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux) The file /lib/init/rw/sendsigs.omit.d/nbd-client is created properly and it contains the PID of nbd-client, but I obtain errors when trying to power off or reboot the diskless computer, just as described here. The question is that I am using just one computer with RW access to the nbd area. I am afraid that my root filesystem can become corrupt. -- SRU: nbd-client is killed during diskless client shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369817] Re: udev rules for raw1394 video1394 not working
According to comment #6, the bug was fixed (udev - 141-2+git4a74214) Three months before, I am running an Ubuntu 9.04 fully updated and still have a wrong version (udev - 141-1.2) Is this update going to be released in Ubuntu 9.04? Anyway, I have examined the diff files, an I can find the solution for 'dv1394' and 'video1394', but I am not able to see any changes related to the raw1394 device. -KERNEL==dv1394[0-9]*,NAME=dv1394/%n, GROUP=video -KERNEL==video1394[0-9]*, NAME=video1394/%n, GROUP=video +KERNEL==dv1394-[0-9]*, NAME=dv1394/%n, GROUP=video +KERNEL==video1394-[0-9]*,NAME=video1394/%n, GROUP=video Ca I fix the /dev/raw1394 device in this file of rules (in order to capture miniDV video with Kino) or should I keep on using the old solution, every time I go to capture video? $ sudo chmod 666 /dev/raw1394 Thanks in advance and excuse my limited English knowledge. -- udev rules for raw1394 video1394 not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369817 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364091] Re: xrandr error with delmode
I am also suffering that bug. It happens in Ubuntu 8.04 and Ubuntu 9.04 The problems appears working on the base X, tested with ATI and Intel graphic cards. It also happens in a Xephyr session. Tried with and without sudo, but no success so far. $ xrandr --delmode VGA 640x480 X Error of failed request: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied) Major opcode of failed request: 156 (RANDR) Minor opcode of failed request: 19 () Serial number of failed request: 14 Current serial number in output stream: 15 -- xrandr error with delmode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364091 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 359197] Re: [zd1211r][ZyDAS WLA-54L WiFi] Crashes Ubuntu 9.04 on boot, when the WLAN stick is attached
I am using this card on a PC with Ubuntu 9.04 with no problem at all. In fact, this card replaces an old USB wifi card that caused me a lot of problems. In my case, the driver seems to be zd1211rw instead of zd1211r. I include related information: $ lsusb | grep ZyDAS Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0ace:1215 ZyDAS WLA-54L WiFi $ dmesg | grep zd1211 [ 13.774826] zd1211rw 1-4:1.0: phy0 [ 13.774860] usbcore: registered new interface driver zd1211rw [ 24.865572] usb 1-4: firmware: requesting zd1211/zd1211b_ub [ 24.976606] usb 1-4: firmware: requesting zd1211/zd1211b_uphr [ 25.066127] zd1211rw 1-4:1.0: firmware version 4725 [ 25.107135] zd1211rw 1-4:1.0: zd1211b chip 0ace:1215 v4810 high 00-02-72 AL2230_RF pa0 g--NS $ lsmod | grep zd1211 zd1211rw 52740 0 mac80211 217208 1 zd1211rw cfg80211 38032 2 zd1211rw,mac80211 -- [zd1211r][ZyDAS WLA-54L WiFi] Crashes Ubuntu 9.04 on boot, when the WLAN stick is attached https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251338] Re: Defective AMI BIOS on multiple Foxconn, MSI, and ASUS Intel LGA 775 motherboards breaks ACPI support
Same problem here! I am migrating my desktop computer from XP to Ubuntu. I have tried 32 and 64 bit versions of 8.04, 8.10, and 9.04 (alfa-4, alfa-5, alfa-6). Right now I am running U9.04 alfa-4 32 bits. $ cat /proc/version Linux version 2.6.28-9-generic (bui...@palmer) (gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu2) ) #31-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 11 15:43:58 UTC 2009 I have had lots of problems with this computer: PCI cards that cause kernel panic, suspend-resume does not work, fans always at top speed, and usb devices that do not work properly. I have finally fount this thread, and this may be the reason of this nightmare of motherboard. MoBo: ASUSTeK Computer INC: P5GD1 PRO BIOS: American Megatrends Inc: 1012.001 (10/13/2005) Just updated BIOS to latest (non-beta) available, but the problem persists. The latest beta version is from 2006, so they do not provide a BIOS without this problem. The problem: $ dmesg | grep 'ACPI Warning' [0.501295] ACPI Warning (tbutils-0217): Incorrect checksum in table [OEMB] - 89, should be 7C [20080926] [1.225647] ACPI Warning (tbutils-0217): Incorrect checksum in table [SSDT] - D7, should be EB [20080926] Any other Ubuntu user with this motherboard? Is there an easy solution to this? -- Defective AMI BIOS on multiple Foxconn, MSI, and ASUS Intel LGA 775 motherboards breaks ACPI support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298628] Re: [8.10 regression] nautilus and sshfs : volumes are detected as 0 bytes-free
The Jaunty package makes possible to work with sshfs, but has also bugs. After having mounted a remote system, the command df -H shows: Size Used Available 1000G 01000G These values are not real at all in my case. -- [8.10 regression] nautilus and sshfs : volumes are detected as 0 bytes-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283165] Re: Intrepid beta kernel panic acx.ko with TNET1130 incorrect firmware version
Same card as Paisa: USR2216, and same problem also. I am unable to run Ubuntu 8.10 (tried both 32 and 64 bit versions). I have also tried Ubuntu 9.04, alfa-4 and alfa-5: always the same problem: As soon as the user passes the gdm login screen, the system hangs up with a kernel panic. I had finally to remove the card from my system, and I am currently working with an USB wifi adapter. Otherwise, I am unable to boot the computer. -- Intrepid beta kernel panic acx.ko with TNET1130 incorrect firmware version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283165 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182489] Re: Atheros wireless (AR5007) not working on various laptops, including the ASUS Eee PC
...I have Installed Ubuntu hardy Heron on my compaq c700 presario Laptop as a virtual machine ... If you installed it as a virtual machine, the physical hardware has nothing to do with the virtual hardware, as seen from the guest operating system. I think that your problem is not related at all with the topic of this thread. -- Atheros wireless (AR5007) not working on various laptops, including the ASUS Eee PC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182489 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182489] Re: Atheros wireless (AR5007) not working on various laptops, including the ASUS Eee PC
Work fine in jaunty fresh install. Are you sure? On what model? I tested on EeePC 701 Jaunty alfa 4 (may be it was alfa 3???) and I was not able to make the wireless working. I did not install it, I just run it from a live-usb. -- Atheros wireless (AR5007) not working on various laptops, including the ASUS Eee PC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182489 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213439] Re: ENE internal SD Card reader doesn't work with Hardy (but work with Gutsy)
I have an Asus Pundit (first generation, motherboard Asus P4S8L) loaded with Ubuntu 8.10 (2.6.27-7) The machine has an ENE card reader. The card reader is only for SD cards. Everithing else works like a charm. $ lspci | grep ENE 00:10.0 CardBus bridge: ENE Technology Inc CB-710/2/4 Cardbus Controller (rev 01) 00:10.1 FLASH memory: ENE Technology Inc CB710 Memory Card Reader Controller I have tested with a couple of SD cards and nothing happens in Ubuntu. The card reader (and the SD cards) works properly under other OS. -- ENE internal SD Card reader doesn't work with Hardy (but work with Gutsy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213439 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269630] [NEW] Network manager: does not remember network after suspend + resume
Public bug reported: Software version: Ubuntu 8.10 alfa-5 + updates Hardware: Asus Eee PC 701 4G (512MB RAM) Network manager remembers properly what wireless access point to connect when the computer is powered on, or after a reboot. On the other side, If I suspend and resume the computer, network manager seems to forget which was the last chosen network and always connects to the first unencrypted network available. I can reproduce the problem everyday, since I am connected to my own wireless network at home. My network uses WEP encryption. Every time I resume the computer after a suspend, the computer connects to an open network (with no encryption) from somebody in the neighborhood. I can then change to my wifi network (so, this is not a duplicate of bug #177053) without problems, so I consider this a minor bug where the only problem is not remembering the preferred (or last used) connection. ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Network manager: does not remember network after suspend + resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269630 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
I also upgraded from Ubuntu 8.04 to 8.10 alfa 5 I can confirm that the bug has been solved, just as Paulo commented before. Unfortunately, the SSD of this computer (Eee PC 701, 512MB + 4GB SSD) does not seem to improve on UDMA66 mode: $ sudo hdparm -t /dev/sda1 /dev/sda1: Timing buffered disk reads: 66 MB in 3.02 seconds = 21.83 MB/sec -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182489] Re: Atheros wireless (AR5007) not working on various laptops, including the ASUS Eee PC
Also tested Intrepid alfa 5 on Eee PC 701, 512MB / 4GB Wireless still does not work out of the box, but with a minimal change it does. Just blacklist the ath_pci module and reboot. Wireless will be working with no problem. To blacklist the module: $ sudo vi /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist Then, add this line to the file: blacklist ath_pci -- Atheros wireless (AR5007) not working on various laptops, including the ASUS Eee PC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182489 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182489] Re: Atheros wireless (AR5007) not working on various laptops, including the ASUS Eee PC
This is the part od dmesg related to the wireless after disabling (blacklisted) the ath_pci module on the Asus Eee PC 701: [ 23.922197] ath5k_pci :01:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 18 [ 23.91] ath5k_pci :01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 23.922283] ath5k_pci :01:00.0: registered as 'phy0' [ 23.926676] ath5k phy0: Support for RF2425 is under development. [ 24.207050] phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'pid' ... [ 30.642164] ath5k phy0: Atheros AR2425 chip found (MAC: 0xe2, PHY: 0x70) -- Atheros wireless (AR5007) not working on various laptops, including the ASUS Eee PC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182489 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
I am using a modified kernel: http://www.array.org/ubuntu/features.html Which includes the 40-wire UDMA patch. I do not know if this same patch is going to be included in the official kernel, but it seems to work flawlessly. Anyway, the speed improvement (Eee PC 701, 4GB) is much less than what I expected. -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
Just updated to the latest kernel available for Hardy (2.6.24-14) a couple of hours ago. No changes. The problem remains the same: [ 27.823382] ata2.00: ATA-4: SILICONMOTION SM223AC, , max UDMA/66 [ 27.823394] ata2.00: 7815024 sectors, multi 0: LBA [ 27.823436] ata2.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable [ 27.839329] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33 -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
** Attachment added: uname-a.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12356842/uname-a.log -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
** Attachment added: version.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12356856/version.log -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
** Attachment added: dmesg.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12356859/dmesg.log -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12356861/lspci-vvnn.log -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110636] Re: hdparm - cannot set dma on IDE hard drive that works via pata
I am doing tests on several machines with Ubuntu 8.04 and I am experiencing a similar problem. I have opened a new bug (#195221), since I think both bugs are related, but I do not think that the problem is the same of this one. I am working with a SSD, identical to a high speed (300x) compactflash card. The device supports up to UDMA66, but I only achieve UDMA33, so I am limited to work at 50% of the device speed. Recent versions of kernels support new parameters in the libata module. So far, I have tested with libata.dma=4 [http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt] (supported by the libata module that I am using), but with no success. In fact, I already have dma support, but not the desired mode (udma66). Currently, my only hope is just to wait until the new set of libata parameters is available in the next kernel releases, just to set the needed values libata.force=80c,udma4. This new parameter is already documented in kernel-parameters, but still not available in the latest Ubuntu kernel. Anyone here has been able to use CF cards or SSD drives at UDMA66 or higher modes? -- hdparm - cannot set dma on IDE hard drive that works via pata https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110636 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
Detected in Ubuntu 8.04 alfa 4 + all currently available updates ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = linux ** Also affects: linux-source-2.6.24 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] [NEW] Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
Public bug reported: I have an Asus Eee PC 4GB laptop, and I am testing Ubuntu Hardy 8.04 (kernel 2.6.24-8) on it. The computer has a 4GB SSD soldered to the motherboard. The disk is reported as UDMA66 capable, but is installed as UDMA33 because the system does not detect a 80 pin conductor. I have tried adding kernel parameters (ide0=ata66 ide1=ata66) but these seems to be ignored. I have read that these parameters are just to instruct the kernel not to do the 40/80 wire test. I have written a blog entry [http://ospatia.blogspot.com/2008/02/eee-pc- optimizar-el-disco-ssd.html] (in Spanish) with additional information (dmesg output, some tests with hdparm, ...) and I have found additioal people having same problem with fast (300x) Compact Flash cards. dmesg output extract: [ 26.700245] ata2.00: ATA-4: SILICONMOTION SM223AC, , max UDMA/66 [ 26.700256] ata2.00: 7815024 sectors, multi 0: LBA [ 26.700297] ata2.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable [ 26.716208] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195221] Re: Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
This bug seems to be related to this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.22/+bug/110636 ...since I obtain the same error message when I try to change to UDMA66 by meadns of hdparm: $ sudo hdparm -X68 /dev/sda /dev/sda: setting xfermode to 68 (UltraDMA mode4) SG_IO: bad/missing ATA_16 sense data:: -- Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
