[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: libatasmart (Fedora) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix ** Changed in: libatasmart (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Running dual-boot Windows 7 / Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric on Dell M90. Windows CHKDSK reports no problems with my hard drive. Ubuntu S.M.A.R.T. reports a staggering 7 million+ bad sectors with green light status: Disk has a few bad sectors. My system runs just fine, which is why I'm adding my 2 cents. ** Attachment added: Screenshot at 2012-03-02 17:51:33.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+attachment/2801866/+files/Screenshot%20at%202012-03-02%2017%3A51%3A33.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I am seeing similar issues with my SSD, lots of errors, but system seems to run fine. On my previous drive however, it started to run slowly, due to recovering errors, and finally reported an error, so something funny is going on. Regards Wilbur Harvey [image: Inline image 1] On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:06 AM, John Wilson 438...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: Running dual-boot Windows 7 / Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric on Dell M90. Windows CHKDSK reports no problems with my hard drive. Ubuntu S.M.A.R.T. reports a staggering 7 million+ bad sectors with green light status: Disk has a few bad sectors. My system runs just fine, which is why I'm adding my 2 cents. ** Attachment added: Screenshot at 2012-03-02 17:51:33.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+attachment/2801866/+files/Screenshot%20at%202012-03-02%2017%3A51%3A33.png -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (413673). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+subscriptions ** Attachment added: Selection_033.jpeg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136/+attachment/2802084/+files/Selection_033.jpeg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: libatasmart Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Tags added: oneiric precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
#165 Right, the updated package wasn't supposed to actually reinterpret the raw values. Is it supposed to reinterpret on fresh installations? After fresh Oneiric and Precise installations during the year palimpsest still counted up allocated sectors, since #172 increase to 53. Tresholds in UI didn't change. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: libatasmart Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: libatasmart Importance: Unknown = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: libatasmart Importance: Medium = Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Did another scan with CD from vendor, it also shows SMART status ok. Palimpsest says at the moment 25 reallocated sectors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
After successful scan with Hitachi DFT palimpsest now shows 15 moved sectors instead of 1 before. ** Attachment added: ATA-Hitachi-HDS5C1050CLA382–SMART.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+attachment/1778484/+files/ATA-Hitachi-HDS5C1050CLA382%E2%80%93SMART.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Attachment added: drive-check https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+attachment/1777476/+files/drive-check -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Affects new hardware and Maverick installation. Thanks to comment #130 I did also advanced check with Hitachi DFT, result: Operation completed successfully Disposition Code: 0x00 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Attachment added: ATA-Hitachi-HDS5C1050CLA382– SMART.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+attachment/1777477/+files/ATA-Hitachi-HDS5C1050CLA382%E2%80%93%20SMART.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 Title: palimpsest bad sectors false positive -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: oem-priority Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: oem-priority Status: Fix Released = Incomplete ** Changed in: oem-priority Assignee: (unassigned) = Robert (robertkanabis) ** Changed in: oem-priority Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
This bug was fixed in the package libatasmart - 0.16-1ubuntu0.1 --- libatasmart (0.16-1ubuntu0.1) karmic-proposed; urgency=low * debian/rules: Enable simple-patchsys. * Add 01_use_manufacturer_bad_blocks.patch: Drop our own many bad sectors heuristic. This currently causes a lot of false positives, because in many cases our treshold is either overly pessimistically low, or the raw value is implausibly high. Just use the normalized values vs. treshold for now. (LP: #438136) -- Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:05:48 +0200 ** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Do you still get those notifications with the current lucid or karmic- proposed packages? I no longer get the notifications, but the SMART data palimpsest still warns that I have 893 bad sectors, which is incorrect. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Graham Inggs [2010-06-11 9:11 -]: I no longer get the notifications, but the SMART data palimpsest still warns that I have 893 bad sectors, which is incorrect. Right, the updated package wasn't supposed to actually reinterpret the raw values. Thanks for testing! ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
adMcb [2010-06-08 15:07 -]: Ok. We all know that the bug is affecting us, but what is the solution for this? It got fixed in 10.04, and for 9.10 (karmic) the fix is in karmic-proposed, waiting to be tested. Please see the updated description for how to test it. I already repaired my disk with HDD Regenerator, and only 10 sectors showed me that same bad completely repaired, and Ubuntu 4.10 Netbook keeps telling me I have 29 000 for bad blocks The patch only changes the threshold at which it starts notifying you (which was very low and incorrect previously). 29.000 bad blocks does sound like something you should start being concerned about, though. Apparently your HDD still has enough spare blocks to cope, but you should watch out whether this number increases over time. If it rapidly does, consider getting a new HDD before you get serious data loss. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
29.000 bad blocks does sound like something you should start being concerned about, though. The problem is that 29000 is the RAW value of the re-allocated sector count, not the actual count of bad sectors. I have a failing Seagate drive that I have been monitoring for several weeks and I have established that on this particular drive, the lower four bits of the RAW value are not part of the count. Palimpsest tells me this drive has 893 bad sectors, but I calculate that it only has 55. Seagate will only replace the drive when it has around 160 bad sectors. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Graham Inggs [2010-06-09 8:50 -]: The problem is that 29000 is the RAW value of the re-allocated sector count, not the actual count of bad sectors. Right. But the notification about Your disk is about to die now checks the normalized value/threshold, which is under control by the driver manufacturer. Do you still get those notifications with the current lucid or karmic-proposed packages? -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Branch linked: lp:debian/sid/libatasmart -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Ok. We all know that the bug is affecting us, but what is the solution for this? I already repaired my disk with HDD Regenerator, and only 10 sectors showed me that same bad completely repaired, and Ubuntu 4.10 Netbook keeps telling me I have 29 000 for bad blocks and that the drive failure is imminent, if it is a bug we need patch, where do we get?. Or to do in this case? THANKS -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/libatasmart -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: oem-priority Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Accepted into karmic-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Tags added: verification-needed -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic-proposed/libatasmart -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
confirm as fixed in Lucid =). -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: oem-priority Status: New = In Progress -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-disk-utility palimpsest complains, that the disk has many bad sectors. palimpsest thinks, that SMART value 5 Reallocated Sector Count fails (screenshot attached). smartctl reports 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 097 097 010Pre-fail Always - 117 (full log attached) which seems to be ok. This error appears on a different system, too. + + SRU TEST CASE: + - Download seb128's demo SMART data which have a few bad blocks, but not enough to be over the manufacturer threshold: + +wget -O /tmp/smart.blobl + http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=34234 + + - Install libatasmart-bin + + - Run + + skdump --load=/tmp/smart.blob --overall + + With the karmic final version this says BAD_SECTOR_MANY which the GUI will react on with a scary notification. + The updated version should just say BAD_SECTOR. + + If you leave out the --overall argument, you get a detailled list of the + attributes. The broken ones will be printed in bold. + + On a healthy system, sudo ./skdump /dev/sda --overall should still + say GOOD, and on a genuinely broken hard disk it should give the + appropriate BAD_SECTOR/BAD_SECTOR_MANY answer. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 28 15:20:15 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: gnome-disk-utility 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.36-generic SourcePackage: gnome-disk-utility Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic x86_64 -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-disk-utility palimpsest complains, that the disk has many bad sectors. palimpsest thinks, that SMART value 5 Reallocated Sector Count fails (screenshot attached). smartctl reports 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 097 097 010Pre-fail Always - 117 (full log attached) which seems to be ok. This error appears on a different system, too. + SRU information: + - Impact: Way too trigger happy about broken disk notifications, which both scares people and also makes them ignore situations where the disk is actually about to die + - Fixed in lucid by reverting from our own bad sectors heuristics (using the raw numbers) to the manufactuer normalized numbers and manufacturer thresholds: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=34242 + - No regression reports since then in lucid. + SRU TEST CASE: - Download seb128's demo SMART data which have a few bad blocks, but not enough to be over the manufacturer threshold: -wget -O /tmp/smart.blobl + wget -O /tmp/smart.blobl http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=34234 - Install libatasmart-bin - Run - skdump --load=/tmp/smart.blob --overall + skdump --load=/tmp/smart.blob --overall With the karmic final version this says BAD_SECTOR_MANY which the GUI will react on with a scary notification. The updated version should just say BAD_SECTOR. If you leave out the --overall argument, you get a detailled list of the attributes. The broken ones will be printed in bold. On a healthy system, sudo ./skdump /dev/sda --overall should still say GOOD, and on a genuinely broken hard disk it should give the appropriate BAD_SECTOR/BAD_SECTOR_MANY answer. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 28 15:20:15 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: gnome-disk-utility 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.36-generic SourcePackage: gnome-disk-utility Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic x86_64 ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-disk-utility palimpsest complains, that the disk has many bad sectors. palimpsest thinks, that SMART value 5 Reallocated Sector Count fails (screenshot attached). smartctl reports 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 097 097 010Pre-fail Always - 117 (full log attached) which seems to be ok. This error appears on a different system, too. SRU information: - - Impact: Way too trigger happy about broken disk notifications, which both scares people and also makes them ignore situations where the disk is actually about to die - - Fixed in lucid by reverting from our own bad sectors heuristics (using the raw numbers) to the manufactuer normalized numbers and manufacturer thresholds: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=34242 + - Impact: Way too trigger happy about broken disk notifications, which both scares people and also makes them ignore situations where the disk is actually about to die + - Fixed in lucid by reverting from our own bad sectors heuristics (using the raw numbers) to the manufactuer normalized numbers and manufacturer thresholds: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=34242 - No regression reports since then in lucid. SRU TEST CASE: - Download seb128's demo SMART data which have a few bad blocks, but not enough to be over the manufacturer threshold: - wget -O /tmp/smart.blobl + wget -O /tmp/smart.blob http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=34234 - Install libatasmart-bin - Run skdump --load=/tmp/smart.blob --overall With the karmic final version this says BAD_SECTOR_MANY which the GUI will react on with a scary notification. The updated version should just say BAD_SECTOR. If you leave out the --overall argument, you get a detailled list of the attributes. The broken ones will be printed in bold. On a healthy system, sudo ./skdump /dev/sda --overall should still say GOOD, and on a genuinely broken hard disk it should give the appropriate BAD_SECTOR/BAD_SECTOR_MANY answer. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 28 15:20:15 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: gnome-disk-utility 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.36-generic SourcePackage: gnome-disk-utility Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic x86_64 -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Ugh, the karmic code is quite a bit different, so I basically needed to implement the same logic for a rather different code base. It's working now, though (see attached debdiff). The SRU test case (see description) is working now, and I also run the old and new version against all the blob examples which are in the source code: for i in blob-examples/*; do echo -- $i; ./skdump --load=$i; done The diff between the old and new version is --- atasmart-test.old 2010-04-23 15:20:42.636609956 +0200 +++ atasmart-test.new 2010-04-23 16:06:49.966609923 +0200 @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ Average Powered On Per Power Cycle: 1.1 h Temperature: No such file or directory Attribute Parsing Verification: Good -Overall Status: BAD_SECTOR_MANY +Overall Status: BAD_SECTOR ID# NameValue Worst Thres Pretty Raw TypeUpdates Good Good/Past 1 raw-read-error-rate 253 252 0 343062 0x163c0500 old-age online n/a n/a 3 spin-up-time196 19163 62 ms 0x3e00fa37 prefail online yes yes @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ Average Powered On Per Power Cycle: 11.2 days Temperature: 40.0 C Attribute Parsing Verification: Good -Overall Status: BAD_SECTOR_MANY +Overall Status: BAD_SECTOR ID# NameValue Worst Thres Pretty Raw TypeUpdates Good Good/Past 1 raw-read-error-rate 200 20051 18 0x1200 prefail online yes yes 3 spin-up-time208 16421 4.6 s 0xd611 prefail online yes yes The first one is against blob-examples/Maxtor_96147H8--BAC51KJ0: 5 reallocated-sector-count226 22663 69 sectors 0x4500 prefail online yes yes and the second one against blob-examples/WDC_WD5000AAKS--00TMA0-12.01C01 5 reallocated-sector-count192 192 140 63 sectors 0x3f00 prefail online yes yes so under the premise of changing the evaluation to use the normalized numbers those are correct and expected changes. (I. e. in those two cases you would have gotten a many bad blocks warning before). ** Patch added: karmic debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45106159/karmic.debdiff -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Uploaded to karmic-proposed queue (needs another SRU team member to review now) and to my PPA at https://launchpad.net/~pitti/+archive/sru- test (sudo add-apt-repository ppa:pitti/sru-test). ** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Karmic) Milestone: None = karmic-updates -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Karmic) Assignee: Canonical Platform QA Team (canonical-platform-qa) = Martin Pitt (pitti) -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I encountered this problem under Karmic on my 6 month old Dell Mini-9 with a 4 GB SSD. I zeroed the SSD with the dd command and installed Lucid Beta 2. Within 30 seconds of the post install restart I was getting the same error message. I loaded and installed all available patches with software update utility but the problem persisited. I then repeated the zero, install, and patch operation again with the same results. At this point I went back to 9.04 and my Dell Mini-9 is again working perfectly. The specific error message I am encountering is as follows: 3.8 GB Hard Disk - ATA STEC ATA DISK vS020.1.0 DISK IS BEING USED OUTSIDE DESIGN PARAMETERS -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Karmic) Assignee: (unassigned) = Canonical Platform QA Team (canonical-platform-qa) -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Just adding that I am getting this as well on my asus 900ha -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors, because there is no debdiff to sponsor. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
@Martin Pitt Can this fix to the heuristics be backported to 9.10 Karmic via SRU? -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Also affects: libatasmart via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25772 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: libatasmart Status: Unknown = Confirmed -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I sent a patch to the upstream freedesktop.org bug, and uploaded a new libatasmart package to lucid. It's currently stuck in UNAPPROVED and will land after the beta-1 release. ** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I'm very happy for this decision. Before to investigate through this problem, I've bought a new hdd for security reason (backup all data), but for now, after 3 months, the numbers of reallocated sectors is stable and haven't increased. This patch could will save unneeded e-waste -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
This bug was fixed in the package libatasmart - 0.17+git20100219-1git2 --- libatasmart (0.17+git20100219-1git2) lucid; urgency=low Upload current Debian packaging git head. * debian/local/apport-hook.py: Update for udisks. * Add 0001-Speed-up-get_overall-and-get_bad.patch: Speed up get_overall() and get_bad(). (fd.o #26834) * Add 0002-Drop-our-own-many-bad-sectors-heuristic.patch: Drop our own many bad sectors heuristic.This currently causes a lot of false positives, because in many cases our treshold is either overly pessimistically low, or the raw value is implausibly high. Just use the normalized values vs. treshold for now. (LP: #438136, fd.o #25772) -- Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:21:47 +0100 ** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/libatasmart -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I definitely have a false positive with my main drive (Hitachi), but something else just occurred to me - when I tried install Karmic from the live CD, it refused to recognize my Hitachi drive as a viable target for installation. In the end, I was forced to upgrade from Intrepid to Jaunty to Karmic using the dist upgrade option in synaptic. I only discovered the false positive issue with palimpsest AFTER I had upgraded to Karmic through synaptic, so in retrospect, I wander if some sort of integrity check is done on the drive before the Karmic CD installer lists it prior to partitioning, and whether this false positive issue actually prevented me from installing Karmic from the live CD onto my Hitachi hard drive. If that is true, perhaps an additional issue should be added to the list for the Karmic live CD? -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Lucid) Milestone: ubuntu-10.04-beta-1 = ubuntu-10.04-beta-2 -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Lucid) Assignee: (unassigned) = Martin Pitt (pitti) -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I got a computer from a friend who said it was not working well. As soon as I booted it with Live CD, I got the error of a disk failing. I did a backup, but some of the files were unreadable, even though S.M.A.R.T says the Read Error Rate is 0 (Raw 0x) Reallocated sectors = 335 and Pending = 122. Obviously the disk is not O.K, because of the read wailures, but shoudn't the read error rate be higher then? In my case, the palimpsest gives reasonable figures and is working wery fine =) -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Also affects: libatasmart (Mandriva) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: libatasmart (zUbuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I also see the same behaviour on a dual-boot (ubuntu 9.10 and winXP) hp 8530w laptop with a Hitachi drive. It suddenly appeared after defragging a shared ntfs data partition. My reallocation sector count is 65538, and the rest seems unremarkable to me (only reallocation event count is 1). I attached screenshots of 3 different SMART tools i ran under windows (HDD health, CrystalDiskInfo, and the windows version of smartctl) to check the palimpsest output. All programs agree about the current/normalised value and threshold (indicating nothing is amiss), but the reading of the raw value of the different programs is interesting (indicated in the screenshot). Remarkably, CrystalDiskInfo also cautions me about the Reallocated Sector count... so far i've come to the conclusion that it's a bug in the way the raw- values of my hitachi drive are translated, but am i right? or is my drive in fact dying, and should i replace it asap? anything else i can post to help? Is there any dev on this? 84 people affected, and copious user reports, but not even an assignee? or does the assignment to redhat-bugs mean it's going to be resolved there first? -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
@Oded Arbel : hmmm now that I am a little less irritable, I seem to agree with your opinion. I have in fact been witnessing some cooling problems lately, although I thought they were pertaining to the CPU only, I didn't know or anticipate that they could be harming my hard disk too, but now I guess I do, I will follow your lead and have it checked out. It is just that I started to experience this only after I upgraded to karmic and while searching I was seeing a lot of such reports that made me feel it is something similar...Thanks. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Dhruva: the problem you are reporting sounds like you do have a problem with the drive and libatasmart is reporting the issue correctly - so this is not the issue that is reported in this bug. Regarding your actual problem, as you had escalating problems with an old drive and now have an escalating problem with a new drive, I would guess that your problem is not the drive but something else. I don't think the problem is that Ubuntu is corrupting the drive as it doesn't seem likely that it has that capability and there is no one else with a similar experience. I would think that you have another hardware problem that causes disks to fail - either insufficient cooling or vibration problems are the most likely issues. I suggest you contact someone with appropriate knowledge to help you resolve this problem. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I am also facing the issue. I had an old SATA hard disk and once I upgraded to Karmic it started giving me hard disk failure errors. I tried to ignore them for a while, but slowly things deteriorated and soon half of my hard disk was rendered useless, even if I tried to format that partition Ubuntu would crash and drives would become read-only and I couldn't save / edit anything on the hard disk. At times when rebooting it would say that no bootable media was found and that it was unable to mount the hard disk. I would restart go to GRUB and select another image to boot from and it would boot fine. In anyways considering the kind of those errors I assumed that something is indeed wrong with the hard disk. I went ahead and purchased a brand new hard disk. (Toshiba), and installed karmic from scratch and installed all my softwares and utilities that I needed for my development setup all over again, took me almost a week. But good thing was that the errors disappeared! One month into that, and the errors have now reappeared. Ubuntu shows me again that there are bad sectors and slowly but steadily they are increasing! Ubuntu would hang suddenly at times and I would have to reboot, go to the recovery console, it would be unable to mount my hard disk and I would have to do a FSCK to repair some inodes and when I then reboot and come back, I am able to boot normally but only to see that the number of bad sector count has increased. I have a terrible feeling that Ubuntu is somehow corrupting my hard disk, I have no reason to believe that my 1 month old brand new hard disk could have any problems whatsoever. This is really pathetic! I have been an Ubuntu fan for over 4 years now and have never looked back to windows. But this whole incident has left me haunted. I can't afford to buy new hard disks every couple of months. This is just not acceptable! Someone please do something. I beg you! -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Bought a brand new WDC WD20EADS-00S2B0 2Tb and as soon as it was installed palimpsest told me it had about 1200 bad blocks. Verifications made by other means shos nothing. Every time I boot a message pops up. But you can tell the program to ignore it and not give advice. So what is the use? -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I confirm the same problem palimpsest bad sectors false positive on Karmic and Lucid Alfa 3. Palimpsest ID errors number 5 and 197 reported on my HD Samsung 1 Terabyte model HD103UJ. Meanwhile, no error is reported on my second HD Hitachi 500 GB model HDT725050VLA360. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Tags added: regression-potential ** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Lucid) Milestone: None = ubuntu-10.04-beta-1 -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
To get a definitive answer to whether the drive is actually remapping defects due to bad blocks you have to examine the defect lists. It's easy to do on SCSI, I expected libata to swizzle the cmd into ATA'ez but it apparently fails on my dell. sg_reassign --grow /dev/sda I don't know how to do it in ATA off the top of my head but I could find out. It's likely accessible only through some SMART log page. I agree with the assertion mentioned here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools/5252 The reason being the drive firmware will remap to another block on write should there be an error. Smart may be trying to be too smart by observing the block re-allocation and coming to the conclusion that this is possible iif a write error occured. Here's a decent defintion of how defect tracking works: http://www.dataclinic.co.uk/hard-drive-defects-table.htm -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Also affects: oem-priority Importance: Undecided Status: New -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
This is not a minor thing, depending on harddrive and environment! If you don't like warning messages turn disk notification off. This tiny feature saved my data two times. Every time starting with a low reallocated sector count. Two days later I had to remove the harddrives, that were almost unusable. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I would like to recieve warnings, when something wrong is going on with my hdd, but it isn't good when we recieve errors, that other software doesn't diagnose. Of course we could say that other software isn't as cautious as palimpsest is. On the other hand, if palimpsest shows an error, other software doesn't and my hdd works without any problems for another 12 months, then we will learn not to trust this utility. Maybe we should have this errors and warnings redesigned to show that some bad things happened, they don't mean that hdd is going to explode in 5 seconds, but we should be cautious, look for weird behaviour and stuff, so we won't think that Palimsest is shouting wolf too many times. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
The problem with palimpsest isn't that there are warnings, or that there aren't warnings (if we will make it less warning happy). I personally would like to get a notification when my first reallocated sector happens - and then I want to be able to ignore this until another failure happens. The problem is that with current palimpsest you can disable warnings completely and manually check every once in a while if you got any new reallocated sectors, or live with a constant warning sign on your desktop that you have to manually check every once in a while to see if you got any new reallocated sectors. So there isn't any difference and we might as well drop palimpsest completely. What I want is that when palimpsest shows a warning, I will have the option of Don't bother me until there are more errors. Its that simple. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I also have encountered the problem during copying file on my 500GB hdd that I bought two weeks ago. Many bad sectors, Reallocated Sector Count: normalized=99, worst=99, threshold=36, value=72 sectors' I think that users should be able to turn off this notification, until the values significantly increase, so we won't be annoyed by minor things that just happen. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Wow. After discovering this thread http://forum.ubuntuusers.de/topic /festplatte-fehlerhafte-sektoren and finding this bug-report, i believe i'm not the only one with a failing hdd. However: 65537 sectors in my case: Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 005 Pre-fail Always - 65537 hdd: Hitachi HTS722080K9SA00 - Hitachi Travelstar 7K200 gsmartcontrol gives me the same error (see the attachment). I would rally appreciate if there's soon found an answer or a solution for this nasty thing. the next step for me is to use some other software to check my hdd. for those of you who have the same hdd, check the hitachi hp: http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/support/download.htm if you need more informations: i'd be glad to help!!! ** Attachment added: Hitachi_HTS722080K9SA00-2010-02-23.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39577307/Hitachi_HTS722080K9SA00-2010-02-23.txt -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
i forgot the basic info: ubuntu karmic 9.10 2.6.31-19-generic -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Today, same thing happened here on Ubuntu 9.10 with a ATA Hitachi HTS54325L9A300 inside a HP 6730B laptop: 'Many bad sectors, Reallocated Sector Count: normalized=100, worst=100, threshold=5, value=65537 sectors' System ran fine for months - since Karmic came out. Occured during a copy job (about 6GB was copying out of a VirtualBox VM into a USB disk). -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Same problem here on my HP Elitebook 8530W. This with a Hitachi HTS723225L9A360 built-in. The program states that there are 65543 bad sectors. That's of course not true. I've tested it with the HP Disk Check(in the Bios) and with the smartmontools. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
bad sectors attachment. after upgrade ** Attachment added: screenshot_006.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38797199/screenshot_006.png -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Karmic, 64bit. Harddisk: ATA Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 Another magic number for: Count of remapped sectors: 131089 (that is 2^17 + 2^4 + 2^0) -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
In my case: Palimpsest : Count of remapped sectors 655420 Count of pending sectors2 Smartctl: Reallocated_Sector_Ct 655420 Current_Pending_Sector2 With the tool of BIOS for check hard disk, show errors in the disk . it seems that my hard disk if it is damaged , but in ubuntu 8.10 I don't has warnings. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
2 different Fujitsu MHY2160BH drives affected here. OK so who's going to elevate the priority on this one - over a hundred affected users here... ;) -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Duplicate bug reported and found this info - no resolution as of now, although I am updating the Karmic Laptop before doing further debugging. http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-220231.html -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Ubuntu 9.10 32bit Hitachi Travelstar HTS541040G9AT00 5400 RPM 40 GB ATA/IDE -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Contrary to statement: The upstream fix is in karmic. Changed in libatasmart (Ubuntu): status: New → Fix Released In marked duplicate bug, this issue is still affecting Karmic as of today's updates on a new install. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libatasmart/+bug/413673 -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I have the same problem with my 400GB ST3400820AS on my desktop HP Pavillion Slimline s3220n. Linux henrique-pc 2.6.31-16-server #53-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 8 05:08:02 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I have this message for one of the two 160GB Hitachi drives on my HP
pavilion laptop. It may be relevant that this drive holds my Windows 7
partition and Ubuntu is stored on the other ('healthy') drive. Windows 7
chkdsk reports the drive is clean.
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Confirmed. I had this same problem on an IBM X41 Tablet. Please help me figure out how to fix this. Has Palimpsest now prevented me from accessing these sectors? Can I unmark these and undo this damage? Computer all of a sudden seems to be slow. Other software shows no SMART errors. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Here's my report, for an old Fujitsu drive in an equally aged Dell Inspiron 500m laptop. Palimpset reports 65537 reallocated sectors, raw value is 0x01000100cf07. Don't know how many reallocated sectors there really are, but I cannot believe that the real value is coincidentally so close to 2^16. ** Attachment added: palimpset-bug-dell-500m.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38004595/palimpset-bug-dell-500m.png -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
confirm http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/4755/83370567.png -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Have the same problem on my HP 530. Palimpset says I have got 720958 bad sectors! :o My hard disk is barely a year old.. I guess there is nothing to do with the bug? It will still appear every time I boot my computer? Thanks laods! -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
attached my report ** Attachment added: Bad sectors.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37541820/Bad%20sectors.png -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
attached my report ** Attachment added: Bad sectors.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37541821/Bad%20sectors.png -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-disk-utility palimpsest complains, that the disk has many bad sectors. palimpsest thinks, that SMART value 5 Reallocated Sector Count fails (screenshot attached). smartctl reports 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 097 097 010Pre-fail Always - 117 (full log attached) which seems to be ok. This error appears on a different system, too. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 28 15:20:15 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: gnome-disk-utility 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: - PATH=(custom, user) - LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.36-generic SourcePackage: gnome-disk-utility Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic x86_64 -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Same problem here in a out of the box Dell Inspiron 1520. / and /home mounted separatedly. ** Attachment added: Pantallazo-2.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37497657/Pantallazo-2.png -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
For all those with very large counts of bad sectors (i.e. 1000) take a look at my comment here: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25772#c2 Basically it looks like the manufacturers are using the raw value in a different way. i.e. the 48 bit value is likely split into 3 x 16bit values that are least significant byte first. (It could be 6 x 8bit values, but I suspect not, as 256 would probably be too low - anyone know how many are normally made available for reallocations?) From Jose Mirco's collection of Hitachi drives: 0x01000F00 65551 0x01000700 65543 0x07002E00 458798 0x05001100 327697 0xB4001D00 1900724 This would tie up with my old IBM/Hitachi in my comment linked above. The fact is that minus specs from manufacturers this raw value can obviously not be relied upon, and to do so is a FAIL! If I had to hazard a guess for the first of the ones above: 0100 = 0x0001 = 1: probably equals the event count of attribute 196. 0F00 = 0x000F = 15: is the number of bad sectors i.e. there was one event where the disk found 15 bad sectors The last one doesn't make so much sense though: B400 = 0x00B4 = 180 1D00 = 0x001D = 29 i.e. there were 180 events where a total of 29 bad sectors were found?!? So perhaps we can't even rely on consistency within a brand. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Same problem here in a out of the box Dell Inspiron 1545. Fresh install on Karmic, / and home mounted separatedly. I'm worried... ¿can my HD fail? thank's ** Attachment added: Pantallazo.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37304292/Pantallazo.png -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
My disk Just started giving a warning too ( Laptop HP dm3 AMD) The magic number is 65543 bad sectors I was about to garbage the disk and thank you for the info here. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I'm also going to mark this as affecting myself, the log is included for a: SAMSUNG PZA064 SSD ** Attachment added: SAMSUNG PZA064 SSD http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37258549/smartctl.txt -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I have the same problem on Hp6130, Standard disk S9808210A. tk. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I have the same problem on Dell mini 10 (SATA SAMSUNG HM160HI) -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
I'm getting a similar warning on my Dell Vostro 1310 with a Samsung Drive. Palimpsest reports something about drive failing and drive has many corrupt sectors. What it doesn't like is the number of the current pending sector. smartctl does not indicate any problem: o...@hermes:~$ sudo smartctl -a /dev/sda smartctl version 5.38 [x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Device Model: SAMSUNG HM160HI Serial Number:S14QJF0Q613911 Firmware Version: HH100-11 User Capacity:160.041.885.696 bytes Device is:In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] ATA Version is: 7 ATA Standard is: ATA/ATAPI-7 T13 1532D revision 0 Local Time is:Sun Dec 27 01:11:45 2009 CET == WARNING: May need -F samsung or -F samsung2 enabled; see manual for details. SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED General SMART Values: Offline data collection status: (0x80) Offline data collection activity was never started. Auto Offline Data Collection: Enabled. Self-test execution status: ( 32) The self-test routine was interrupted by the host with a hard or soft reset. Total time to complete Offline data collection: ( 61) seconds. Offline data collection capabilities:(0x5b) SMART execute Offline immediate. Auto Offline data collection on/off support. Suspend Offline collection upon new command. Offline surface scan supported. Self-test supported. No Conveyance Self-test supported. Selective Self-test supported. SMART capabilities:(0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering power-saving mode. Supports SMART auto save timer. Error logging capability:(0x01) Error logging supported. General Purpose Logging supported. Short self-test routine recommended polling time:( 2) minutes. Extended self-test routine recommended polling time:( 61) minutes. SCT capabilities: (0x003f) SCT Status supported. SCT Feature Control supported. SCT Data Table supported. SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 100 100 051Pre-fail Always - 1 3 Spin_Up_Time0x0007 252 252 025Pre-fail Always - 2062 4 Start_Stop_Count0x0032 082 082 000Old_age Always - 184167 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 252 252 010Pre-fail Always - 0 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 096 096 000Old_age Always - 2662 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 099 099 000Old_age Always - 1179 191 G-Sense_Error_Rate 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 646 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 41 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 121 085 000Old_age Always - 39 (Lifetime Min/Max 5/51) 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 132552 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000Old_age Always - 826 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 100 100 000Old_age Offline - 2876 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count0x0036 252 252 000Old_age Always - 0 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x000a 252 252 000Old_age Always - 0 SMART Error Log Version: 1 No Errors Logged SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 Num Test_DescriptionStatus Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error # 1 Short offline Completed without error 00% 2651 - # 2 Short offline Completed without error 00% 1 - # 3 Short offline Completed without error 00% 0 - # 4 Short offline Aborted by host 150% 0 - SMART Selective Self-Test Log Data Structure Revision Number (0) should be 1 SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 0 Warning: ATA
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
@Martin Pitt I have filled 2 bug reports for that. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25772 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25773 ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #25772 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25772 ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #25773 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25773 -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Jean-Louis, thank you for working on this patch! Would you mind reporting it upstream at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=libatasmart so that it can be intregrated upstream? It's pretty intrusive and also potentially changes the behaviour of libatasmart clients (such as devicekit-disks and gvfs), so we shouldn't carry this in Ubuntu only. -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Getting a similar problem myself on HP Compaq nc6120; ATA Fujitsu MHT2080AH PL 80gb drive; reporting 65537 bad sectors; computer *seems* to be working fine; screen attached. ** Attachment added: Screenshot of Palimpsest SMART error message. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37096046/Screenshot-SMART%20Data.png -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Getting a similar problem myself on HP Compaq nc6120; ATA Fujitsu MHT2080AH PL 80gb drive; reporting 65537 bad sectors; computer *seems* to be working fine; screen attached. ** Attachment added: Screenshot of Palimpsest SMART error message. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37096057/Screenshot-SMART%20Data.png -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
+1 confirm issue: ATA SAMSUNG HM160HI in Dell Mini 10v Ubuntu 9.10 NBR -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
confirm issue: ATA SAMSUNG HM160HI -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
New version of patch with correct patch tagging (I hope). ** Attachment removed: libatasmart_0.17-1git1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36757930/libatasmart_0.17-1git1.debdiff ** Attachment added: libatasmart_0.17-1git1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36771955/libatasmart_0.17-1git1.debdiff ** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Lucid) Assignee: Martin Pitt (pitti) = (unassigned) -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
