[Bug 47971] Re: synaptics touch pad(laptop) clicks when i dont want it to
I saw this tapping issue after a recent update on an IBM ThinkPad T41 running Dapper. Any fix yet? MaxTapTime was already set previously, and somehow, things broke after we updated. I can say that it did work in kernel revision 2.6.15-25-386, but broke when we upgraded an booted 2.6.15-26-386. However, trying kernel 2.6.15-25-386 from GRUB does not resolve the issue now. It appears that something got really broken between the update a few weeks ago, and the recent update like a week and a half ago. Hrm... Any ETA on a fix yet? Does anyone even have an idea what happened? Could it be that it got broken in the attempt to fix the "crazy touchpad" symptoms mentioned in June? And that the July fix broke the ability to disable the tapping functionality? -- synaptics touch pad(laptop) clicks when i dont want it to https://launchpad.net/bugs/47971 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47971] Re: synaptics touch pad(laptop) clicks when i dont want it to
THIS IS NOT AN AMD64 SPECIFIC ISSUE! YOU CANNOT DISABLE THE TOUCHPAD EVEN ON AN IBM THINKPAD (PENTIUM 32-BIT) RUNNING AN i386 KERNEL!!! -- Kristian Hermansen -- synaptics touch pad(laptop) clicks when i dont want it to https://launchpad.net/bugs/47971 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47971] Re: [Bug 47971] Re: synaptics touch pad(laptop) clicks when i dont want it to
On 9/18/06, AaronPeterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's just generally broken, and I was happy to actually stumble across > somebody saying similar stuff. Yes, MaxTapTime is very broken and I have seen this bug on more than one machine now... -- Kristian Hermansen -- synaptics touch pad(laptop) clicks when i dont want it to https://launchpad.net/bugs/47971 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71187] banshee crashes -- wikipedia plugin?
Public bug reported: Don't know why it crashed...but check the attached file for backtrace. I was clicking on the wikipedia plugin around that time... -- Kristian Hermansen ** Affects: banshee (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- banshee crashes -- wikipedia plugin? https://launchpad.net/bugs/71187 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71187] Re: banshee crashes -- wikipedia plugin?
automatically generated crash report from edgy... ** Attachment added: "crash report" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5033774/_usr_bin_banshee.1000.crash -- banshee crashes -- wikipedia plugin? https://launchpad.net/bugs/71187 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106177] Re: make dmraid play nice with udev
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- make dmraid play nice with udev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107831] Re: Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX
** Changed in: grub (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: xorg => grub -- Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/18/07, Alessandro Tanasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds great! > > The todo list is: These seem relatively easy. How are we building the package after the changes are made. If you give me the steps, I can make one on my amd64 box, but it shouldn't really matter in this case, since this is all interpreted code. Just let me know what your method was for building the completed DEB... -- Kristian Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/19/07, Alessandro Tanasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When the author release the new tar.gz i upload the deb that i have ready. > I think that the first thing is that the author make a new tar.gz So you want the metasploit dev team to release a new tar.gz with the changes you requested previously so that your DEB is legal to the license agreement (unchanged package)? Do I understand you correctly? -- Kristian Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/20/07, Alessandro Tanasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only 2 options that i see to get metasploit in ubuntu are: > 1) that we have a special agreement to package it, modifing metasploit > license (hard to do) > 2) that dev team release a new version debianization friendly (i think easy > to do) OK, let's go for option two. How about you whip up a script to make the changes you propose, so that all the MSF devs need to do is run it, and then we have the package just as we want. How does that sound? Do you want to write it or have me do it? I don't care, either way... -- Kristian Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123857] Re: feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does!
On 7/24/07, Babets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This package is present in that repository as we can see in the link below > http://archive.canonical.com/pool/main/r/realplay/ > but i don't understand why it does not appear using the repository. > However realplay package is not present in medibuntu repository > https://bugs.launchpad.net/medibuntu/+bug/104115 Actually, you will notice that the latest file release date for those RealPlay packages are well before the release of Feisty Fawn in April of 2007. I spoke with one of the commercial packagers at Ubuntu Live this week, and when asked about this, he just mentioned that they didn't have enough time or resources to get a RealPlay package into Feisty Fawn (7.04). So, I think it would be a good idea to leave the bug open so that we can mark it RESOLVED if Gutsy adds the package again... -- Kristian Hermansen -- feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123857] Re: feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does!
On 7/25/07, Babets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't understand where is the problem with the mantainers of that > repository; the package is present, the only thing to do is to add it in the > package list. > Maybe is it a good idea to send a mail to mantainers? > > > Off topic: :) > the only thing i don't like in ubuntu is that many packages (probably those > present in universe/multiverse like amsn or many multimedia players) are not > frequently upgraded. I agree, but they told me that they don't have enough people and are understaffed. Volunteer your time to get it in there. Ask to become a MOTU, and then from there, try to work on the Commercial repos... -- Kristian Hermansen -- feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107778] Re: adept: Failed to lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock
I am marking this bug as invalid, but please reopen if you have more information. ** Changed in: adept (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- adept: Failed to lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129799] [needs-packaging] libdca
Public bug reported: http://www.videolan.org/developers/libdca.html libdca - a free DTS Coherent Acoustics decoder libdca is a free library for decoding DTS Coherent Acoustics streams. The code is written by Gildas Bazin and was based on the a52dec project. It is released under the terms of the GPL license. The DTS Coherent Acoustics standard (ETSI 102 114 v1.2.1), as published by the ETSI, is available here "The library should however already be quite useable." ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: MOTU Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging ** Changed in: Ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU -- [needs-packaging] libdca https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129797] vlc crops the video output of some encoded mp4 files, but totem works fine
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vlc This file looks bad in vlc, but fine in totem. Only 1/4 of the top is seen in vlc, whereas totem shows the full picture... http://www.stevenshiau.org/misc/Clonezilla-talk-by-Kristian.mp4 ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- vlc crops the video output of some encoded mp4 files, but totem works fine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129797 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131690] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 102212 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 I hope you have spoken with hdm about this, as the package is not freely distributable per the Metasploit license agreement. See my duplicate bug. I am currently try to engage them to make us a proper release for distribution in debian/ubuntu... ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 102212 [needs-packaging] metasploit -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131690 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 98886] Re: [need-packaging] drbl / clonezilla
On 8/14/07, Bryan McLellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Additionally, many of the scripts were not written by the authors. There > are scripts in these packages using a number of different licenses, > including GPL, MPL, Perl Artistic, BSD (with advertising clause), and > many pieces of code without copyright information that will need to be > resolved before inclusion. Thanks for laying out exactly which pieces need to be looked at. I am sure Steven has already begun the process of figuring out what to do here. I will check in with him and see if I can lend a hand in cleaning some of it up. They may also receive more funding from Taiwan's NCHC to work on clonezilla/drbl since it has grown in usage greatly in just a few short months... http://www.google.com/trends?q=clonezilla -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [need-packaging] drbl / clonezilla https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98886 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131690] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 102212 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 On 8/14/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Kristian Hermansen, I'll make further comments on bug 102212. > This bug has been labeled as invalid. You can still help package it when the time comes if you want... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131690 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 8/14/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I too have a packaged version, from the unmodified metasploit release, > it is more then possible to build the deb with the SVN, as SVN is used > to update the exploits, and other framework modules. May not be the > ideal build, but can work. Someone has claimed that leaving .svn around is against debian policy, which would be understandable... > Either way, if you want to modify the "original package" we can simply > write a patch, and place it in the debian/ directory. But again, > doesn't seem modifications are necessary, everything builds fine. And > that is when we start to interfere with the license. Yes, the problem is modification and distribution... > The real issue here isn't the "ease" of packaging metasploit, but the > license itself. Yup :-) msf2 is GPL, but not msf3... > So do we have the license issue resolved? In what other ways can I > assist? Alessandro Tanasi we should trade .changes to see where we can > improve the package, before upload to REVU. hdm is busy at the moment, so we will hear from the msf devs when they get some free time. msf3 won't make it into Gutsy anyways, right? Unless there is some way we can get it into gutsy there is no reason to rush. If you know a cut off date for gutsy, let me know, but I thought the cutoff for universe/multiverse was when they did the pull from debian unstable, which is relatively early in the cycle... > I am really looking forward to getting metasploit in the Ubuntu > repositories. Me too :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
Here is the script I whipped up...let me know if you find any issues with it... ** Attachment added: "Patch to clean up msf3 for packaging in ubuntu" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8835571/metasploit-ubuntu-pkg-clean-khermans.sh -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
Here is the script I whipped up...let me know if you find any issues with it... ** Attachment added: "Script to clean up msf3 for packaging in ubuntu" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8835572/metasploit-ubuntu-pkg-clean-khermans.sh -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We need to check into this a bit more, as I asked about the policy (when I > started working on MSF), and was told, it is not against policy, just frowned > upon. The problem, without the SVN updates, the user would be unable to pull > the new exploits and modules. And its almost pointless to repackage and > distribute the entire binary deb every time one exploit is released, which > may only be 15 lines of Ruby. If we do decide to scrap the SVN update > capability, we will need to come up with a update path for exploits/modules. You have a good point. If it is not against policy, and since this package with be in multiverse anyways, and having updates is a good thing obviously, let's leave them in! Thanks for making a valid point to convince me. You are right. If it is not a hard rule for Debian, it really does amkes sense to leave them in if we won't be penalized for it -- due to the nature of security products and how quickly they are updated. 6 months would be a long time to wait for a new release :-) > Seems in this case we just ignore the SVN issue. Yup. Let's do it. Btw, the cutoff date for multiverse is August 30th. So, if we get the package in before that time, it will be in Gutsy. I checked with #ubuntu-motu. Also, I asked them about the license issues, and the only requirement for multiverse is that the package is allowed to be redistributed. So, we will have metasploit in Gutsy if we hurry up and get this done :-) > Also, some of the errors linda/lintian is producing are due to the > windows files packaged within MSF and the fact that some of the ruby > modules aren't set as executable. This can easily be fixed by a patch > (if not safely ignored). Just take my script, and comment out the clean_svn function at the bottom. Run the other two cleanup routines, and let me know how linda/lintian handles the result. Can you do that today? > Can you create a diff patch of the end result of your script. That it what we would use in the Package, as well as what the MSF devs would want to see. The only files that need to be "modified" are the invalid Ruby script paths (/usr/local/bin/ruby). In my script, I fix them to be (/usr/bin/env ruby). I highly doubt that this constitutes a breach of the Metasploit license agreement, as this portion of the code is not the intellectual property. If we started to modify the logic, that would be a problem, and that's what the license is trying to prevent. All the other changes my script does are dealing with executable permissions and trying to determine which files should or should not be set. I think it worked fairly well. So, get back to me when you have a moment. Maybe we can check in our package into Gutsy before the weekend :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > E: metasploit: wrong-path-for-ruby ./usr/share/metasploit/external > /ruby-pcapx/examples/tcpdump.rb #!/usr/local/bin/ruby > > Your script does _NOT_ seem to fix this error. However, I do not get > that output with or without your patch. It should! The clean_ruby_paths function should change three files which have this issue. Does it not? I basically just do a sed on the files and replace with (/usr/bin/env ruby). You could fix my script, if it is broken, but don't think it is! Or you could write another script/patch which does this. Or manually. Then we can get it packaged and uploaded for Gutsy. We only have two weeks though. So, let's hustle :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132714] make-ssl-cert does not produce any warnings on cert creation if subdirectory is non-existant
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ssl-cert # make-ssl-cert /usr/share/ssl-cert/ssleay.cnf /etc/apache2/ssl/apache.pem If the ssl sub-directory in /etc/apache2 does not exist, and you try to create the certificate, everything appears to have gone OK, but the file is never written to disk. This could be considered a bug or an enhancement. Either way, at least a warning should appear. Does make- ssl-cert not check for errors when writing the file out to disk? ** Affects: ssl-cert (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - make-ssl-cert does not produce any warnings on cert creation if subdirectory is non-existant + make-ssl-cert does not produce any warnings on cert creation if file fails to be written -- make-ssl-cert does not produce any warnings on cert creation if file fails to be written https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is the diff patch to correct Ruby paths... > > ** Attachment added: "Ruby Path Correction (diff/patch)" >http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8841542/ruby.patch Great! So is it ready to be uploaded for Gutsy??? :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Ruby issue has been resolved, but the scripts method for determining > the correct permissions only partial worked. We still have plenty of > permissions issues. So we need to decide how we will proceed with > those. Can you post the warning messages? > In addition, I have setup a symlink to /usr/bin/ for all of the > executables (msfcli, msfgui, etc). And created a menu link with the MSF > (#) logo. This is all working great, with no issue. The question > however, were should we install the metasploit files? > > I was thinking /usr/local/metasploit/framework-3.0 I think /usr/share/ is better... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Can you post the warning messages? > > W: metasploit; Executable > /usr/local/metasploit/framework-3.0/external/source/meterpreter/source/extensions/stdapi/server/net/net.h > with perms 0755 is not an ELF file or script. > > Seems this should have been covered by the script? Should have! Did you first drop the script into the root directory of metasploit? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When packaging you cannot modify the source package at all, other then > through patches. > > As such I added the patch to the debian/rules. Let me check something. My file is a shell script, not a patch made with diff. And I made the script require to be run from the root directory. You can change that to suit the Debian rules if you like. I am not familiar with everything they enforce... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right, I made a diff, after running your script, thats the RUBY patch > above. Of course :-) I saw that... > However, 'diff' doesn't catch the change in file permissions etc. Yup! > Therefore, within the debian/rules I used part of your script, but that > doesn't seem to be working. What I am saying is that if you put the other parts of my script into another directory (debian/rules) and run it, it will fail to catch all the files I believe. It starts searching from the current directory and recursively downward... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think there is a build function to do this, I just need to find it Let me know if you find it... > I am on the road, will be back on the PC in 45. No problem. I just got back from the BeanSec security meetup in Boston. Fun times... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, so I got it working, sort of. > > I am now getting an error from you function, looking into this. Post the output? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/16/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, well, we should be good to go, I was able to integrate the needed > permission changes into the build. The Ruby patch applies as well. Excellent. > Any other needed changes? Not that I can think of! > I'll post linda/lintian without SVN errors, so we can review. Anything major? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/16/07, Alessandro Tanasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello guys, > i was away this days for the CCCamp. I heard it was a good time from my hackers on a plane friends :-) > I see that you done a good work, but remember that tha msf sources can't > modified. > So you can't apply any sort of patches. The only file we "modified" was the ruby paths from '/usr/local/bin/ruby' to '/usr/bin/env ruby'. This is not intellectual property... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/16/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let's break down the License, and see where we fall. OK. So let's do this. Will msf3 work unmodified? And will Ubuntu allow msf3 to slip in unmodified into multiverse? If so, I say we just add it to Gutsy ASAP and then worry about cleaning it up for the next release. We could easily get into many days of interpretation of the license. If we can just place it in multiverse now, we can worry about all that stuff later and get more feedback from hdm when he is not so busy... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/16/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are right, and none of us (as far as I know) are lawyers, nor Dev's > for MSF. But it is clear to me that modifications are allowed, and they > would result in a cleaner package. Just throwing everything together, > without fixing the current linda/lintian issue, will most likely get the > package rejected, meaning it may not make it in Gutsy at all. Agreed. But if the Metasploit license requires that any changes must NOT be distributed, then we may have an issue. I think we know the license's intention, but we are not allowed to take a risk on behalf of Ubuntu regarding this. The guidelines are there to protect them. So, if we want to default to the least amount of risk, let's go with unmodified. Your only issue with adding it unmodified is that it may be rejected. When we submit it, we could let them know that the issues are only warnings at that they will be resolved in Gutsy+1. If they reject it then, we can send the modified version... > But to answer the question at hand, Yes. Metasploit runs fine, exactly > the way it is packaged, even with the Ruby path issues, and the > permissions etc. We would still have a .desktop (Menu Entry) and > everything else, so it works. Excellent... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/16/07, Alessandro Tanasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that we need a law expert, and as i say in the first posts of > this bug the only easy way is that the msf dev team start to distribute > good archive. Yes ok, but that law does not come into play unless the package is modified, right? So we can worry about fixing the package later. We only have 12 more days to get msf3 in for Gutsy... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123857] Re: feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does!
Thank you for working on this! -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/17/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kristian, I know you have been "attempting" to speak with the MSF Dev's. > Any chance they will apply the patches upstream? Alessandro is right, > it would make things a lot easier, because then we would have no need to > edit the source. hdm is back it seems. Why don't you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], let them know what we are trying to do, and about the issues we encountered. He hasn't gotten back yet about applying my script to the source. So, they may not want to do it. But let's make the list as short as possible. Maybe we can just ask him to change the Ruby paths instead, and do it manually? I think he might have been weary of using my script on the source blindly... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67369] Re: [Feisty] Wide screen not correctly detected (16/10)
I am also encountering this bug. -- [Feisty] Wide screen not correctly detected (16/10) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/20/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll be packaging tonight, and will place the package online for testing > etc. > > Let me know if you are interested in testing. Great! Sure, I will test it. I think we should make the 'subversion' package a RECOMMENDS. What do you think? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/20/07, Alessandro Tanasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The first metaspoilt 3 package that i do when i open this bug have the > following: > > Depends: ruby, libruby, rdoc, libyaml-ruby, libzlib-ruby, libopenssl- > ruby, libdl-ruby, libreadline-ruby, libiconv-ruby, libgtk2-ruby, > libglade2-ruby What about gems/rails? > and recommends svn. Correct package name is 'subversion'... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/20/07, Alessandro Tanasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I consider to deploy a separate package with web interface, in my packages. So, if we can't modify the package, does that mean that you want the same package in repositories twice, one with the web interface dependencies, and on without? I think the web interface is a huge part of msf3, especially for people who will be using it on Ubuntu. If we left that out, it would be a major detriment. Otherwise, we would need th same package in the repos twice (metasploit3 and metasploit3-web)... > Are you a kind of pedantic guy? svn stay for nickname of subversion ;) I just wanted to make sure the package name was termed correctly. If you make the package RECOMMEND 'svn' apt will not resolve this package, as it is not valid. svn is the command name and not the package name. Yes, pedantics are my specialty :-p -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/20/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, so in general, I would agree that an application that doesn,t > normall have a web feature, should seperated. > > I would also apply this rule to a GUI interface. > > But where do we draw the line? Yes, I also agree that under ideal circumstances this would be the case. However, we are working with a restrictive license so this become a larger issue. Suggest deferring until license is changed... > Just because MSF2 didn't have a GUI or a webinterface, doesn't mean that > people using version 3 won't want it. Then again, are really the ones > who should make that decision? I do not believe so. msf2 did has a GUI as well :-) It just wasn't as easy to use as it is today. I use both the cli and gui, depending on how lazy I am and if I am screening the session, etc. Sometimes for n00bs, a GUI helps them learn enough that they can feel comfortable with the cli at a later point... > But do we really want a metaspolit-core, metasploit-gui, and metasploit- > web. I do see a benifit, as dependencies would be diffrent etc. And I > for one rearly use the web interface, and the GUI is far from mature. > > But then enters the legality issue. Can we really split the package up? > That would require upstream approval, or for them to alter the way they > distribute the package, and I see no benifit for them to do either. Do > you? Yes, there is a benefit, but not at the cost of delaying the package inclusion and/or dealing with license issues... > Last but I am sure not least, updates. Metasploit is updated with SVN, > which would replace the missing files, so the first time the user > updates his metaspolit installation (core) he ends up with the same > thing he would have gotten with -web and -gui. Where is the point in > that? This is the best point to have been made. It makes no sense to break it up if you will pull the files right back in :-) > Of course we could modifiy the package further, and make it only update > part of the package, based on what they install. But all of that would > come far after Gutst, and be more likely after Metasploit LLC releases a > license change, which is in the works. > > So, I do agree, that split packages could be benifitial, however, I do > not this that should be the focus of this release. Instead, I think a > solid package from SVN with all compoents is in order. Agreed, so please include the dependencies for the web interface as well as I have listed. This will be great. 10 days left to cut off :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/20/07, Alessandro Tanasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, and i am pedantic. So i say, that line is a comment, no a control > file line, so i think i can use a friendly alias. > And now, like pedantic guys, i think we need a huge beer. Let's all hang out and grab some beers at the next security-con. Here is a Google Calendar list of many events ongoing... http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=pe2ikdbe6b841od6e26ato0asc%40group.calendar.google.com -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124641] Re: device-manager - failure when launch application ?
I am also seeing this exact same issue in Gutsy on my IBM ThinkPad T42p upgraded from Feisty tonight. I get tens of these messages per second and they are taking up lots of CPU. PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 2579 root 21 -4 18528 16m 412 R 73.9 0.8 5:24.31 udevd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ps aux | grep -i udevd root 2579 60.8 0.8 19168 17404 ?R Ubuntu Core Development Team Status: New => Confirmed ** Summary changed: - device-manager - failure when launch application ? + device-mapper: ioctl: error adding target to table -- device-mapper: ioctl: error adding target to table https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 115616] Re: Device-mapper errors: dm-linear, lookup failed
___ on /etc/evms.conf in sysfs_devices added : exclude = [ * ] ___ This fix worked for me, but is it correct? Will it break things in the future??? -- Device-mapper errors: dm-linear, lookup failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/21/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pulled the latest snapshot from (Rev:5080), however all of the > permission issues are still present. The permissions issues are able to be modified, and do not fall under the relevant source code changes policy. They did fix the ruby files though, right? So, let me know if you need help modifying the permissions. We can do it manually for this first build, and talk to the msf boys again later. Do you want me to take over the package upload from here, or do you want to finish up with the permission issues and submit it? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124895] Re: coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command
This issue is mentioned by some Debian folks... http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00144.html And the apparent realization of the issue, with no solution given... http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00147.html -- coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124895] coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=feisty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 7.04" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a Linux hermbuntu 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Thu Jun 7 20:19:32 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aptitude reinstall ~i~Afeisty Password: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Building tag database... Done The following packages will be REINSTALLED: acpi acpi-support acpid adduser aespipe alacarte alsa-base alsa-utils anacron apache2 apache2-mpm-worker apache2-utils apache2.2-common apmd app-install-data app-install-data-commercial apport apport-gtk appres apt apt-utils aptitude aspell aspell-en at at-spi avahi-autoipd avahi-daemon banshee base-files base-passwd bash bc beforelight belocs-locales-bin bind9-host binfmt-support binutils binutils-static bitmap bittorrent blt blubuntu-gdm-theme bluez-cups bluez-gnome bluez-pin bluez-utils boo brltty brltty-x11 bsdmainutils bsdutils bsh bug-buddy build-essential busybox-initramfs bzip2 ca-certificates capplets-data cdparanoia cdrdao cdrecord checkinstall cli-common command-not-found command-not-found-data compiz compiz-core compiz-extra compiz-gnome compiz-gtk compiz-plugins console-setup console-terminus console-tools contact-lookup-applet coreutils cpio cpp cpp-4.1 cron cupsys cupsys-bsd cupsys-client cupsys-common cupsys-driver-gutenprint dash dbus dbus-1-utils dc dcraw debconf debconf-i18n debianutils defoma deskbar-applet desktop-base desktop-effects desktop-file-utils dhcdbd dhcp3-client dhcp3-common dia dia-common dia-libs dictionaries-common diff discover1 discover1-data diveintopython dmidecode dmsetup dnsutils doc-base docbook-xml dosfstools dpkg dpkg-dev dselect dvd+rw-tools e2fslibs e2fsprogs ed edgy-gdm-themes editres eject ekiga emacs emacs21 emacs21-bin-common emacs21-common emacsen-common eog esound esound-common espeak espeak-data ethereal ethtool evince evolution evolution-common evolution-data-server evolution-data-server-common evolution-exchange evolution-plugins evolution-webcal example-content f-spot fdutils feisty-gdm-themes feisty-session-splashes feisty-wallpapers file file-roller findutils finger firebird2-common firefox firefox-gnome-support flashplugin-nonfree fontconfig fontconfig-config foo2zjs foomatic-db foomatic-db-engine foomatic-db-hpijs foomatic-filters fortune-mod fortunes-min fping freeglut3 fstobdf ftp fuse-utils g++ g++-4.1 gaim gaim-data gamin gcalctool gcc gcc-3.3-base gcc-4.1 gcc-4.1-base gcj-4.1-base gconf-editor gconf2 gconf2-common gdb gdebi gdebi-core gdm gdm-themes gedit gedit-common genisoimage gettext gettext-base gftp gftp-common gftp-gtk gftp-text gij gij-4.1 gimp gimp-data gimp-help-common gimp-help-en gimp-print gimp-python gksu gnome-about gnome-accessibility-themes gnome-app-install gnome-applets gnome-applets-data gnome-btdownload gnome-cards-data gnome-compiz-manager gnome-control-center gnome-cups-manager gnome-desktop-data gnome-doc-utils gnome-games gnome-games-data gnome-icon-theme gnome-keyring gnome-keyring-manager gnome-mag gnome-media gnome-media-common gnome-menus gnome-mime-data gnome-mount gnome-netstatus-applet gnome-nettool gnome-orca gnome-panel gnome-panel-data gnome-pilot gnome-pilot-conduits gnome-power-manager gnome-screensaver gnome-session gnome-spell gnome-system-monitor gnome-system-tools gnome-terminal gnome-terminal-data gnome-themes gnome-user-guide gnome-utils gnome-volume-manager gnomebaker gnupg gpgv graphviz grep groff-base grub gs-common gs-esp gs-esp-x gsfonts gsfonts-x11 gstreamer0.10-alsa gstreamer0.10-esd gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad gstreamer0.10-plugins-base gstreamer0.10-plugins-base-apps gstreamer0.10-plugins-good gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly gstreamer0.10-tools gstreamer0.10-x gthumb gtk-gnutella gtk2-engines gtk2-engines-pixbuf gtk2-engines-ubuntulooks gtkhtml3.14 gucharmap guile-1.6-libs gzip hal hal-device-manager hal-info hdparm hellanzb hexedit hicolor-icon-theme hostname hotkey-setup hpijs hplip hplip-data human-cursors-theme human-icon-theme human-theme hwdb-client-common hwdb-client-gnome iceauth icedax ico ifupdown info initramfs-tools initscripts inputattach installation-report intltool-debian iproute iptables iputils-arping iputils-ping iputils-tracepath iso-codes jackd java-common k3b kamera kcontrol kdebase-bin kdebase-data kdebase-kio-plugins kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2a kdemultimedia-kio-plugins kdesktop kicker klibc-utils klogd landscape-client language-pack-en language-pack-en-base language-pack-gnome-en language-pack-gnome-en-base language-selector language-sele
[Bug 30780] Re: [PR 26167, fixed in 4.3] g++ -Wconversion fails to detect signedness conversion from int to unsigned int in function call
** Summary changed: - [PR 26167, fixed in 4.3] g++ -Wconversion fails to detect signedness conversion from int to unsigned int in fuction call + [PR 26167, fixed in 4.3] g++ -Wconversion fails to detect signedness conversion from int to unsigned int in function call -- [PR 26167, fixed in 4.3] g++ -Wconversion fails to detect signedness conversion from int to unsigned int in function call https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/14/07, Alessandro Tanasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NO! > It's released under Metasploit Framework license. The OLD Metasploit 2.0 was > GPL. > Your simply must, download, unpack, and read the copyright. I just emailed the developers to see if there is some way we can work this out. They are cool guys, and are not trying to prevent distribution. They are trying to prevent people reselling the product. How can we distribute Metasploit for Ubuntu, to ease installation and user accessibility, but give the developers what they want as well? If Sun can distribute their packages on Ubuntu, then Metasploit should be able to as well with some sort of license agreement screen, etc, on installation as the 'sun-java6-bin' package does (among others). This is not a technical issue. It is merely a legal and political hindrance that can be overcome by working together to satisfy all parties involved. Let's make it work. -- Kristian Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/14/07, H D Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The license does allow for packaging, provided that the software is not > modified and is not sold for a value above the cost of distribution. A > number of free software distributions include Metasploit 3 in > the "non-free" trees. Thanks for clarifying dude. OK, so if we can all agree that the package will not be modified or sold, and Alessandro has a package ready to go, let's get it into Ubuntu. Do you think that metasploit would fit into universe or multiverse? I would think that it is free enough for universe according to http://www.ubuntu.com/community/ubuntustory/components but if there are any doubts it probably should be placed into multiverse. The major factor here would be how "free" metasploit is considered to be if the sources cannot be modified for distribution. That might make it ripe for the multiverse category... -- Kristian Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/14/07, Alessandro Tanasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, great! > But before write my first comment here i talk with a couple of motu in > #ubuntu-motu, they thinks that metasploit cant be in ubuntu, but if the > author write this, he know sure the license better :) > The problem is that the software must be modified to be a good debian > package, for example i have removed the .svn directory that is crap in a > package, and so on.. Great! Let's put together a list of items that need to be modified in the package, and we will present them to H D and see if he will OK them or show us a clause that allows such simple modifications. How does that sound? -- Kristian Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133906] Re: ndiswrapper - bootloading failed
I can confirm this in latest updates of Gutsy on my HP amd64 laptop... ** Changed in: ndiswrapper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- ndiswrapper - bootloading failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133906] Re: ndiswrapper - bootloading failed
I have a bcm4306 wifi chipset, and this all worked in feisty amd64, as well as gutsy amd64 until a week ago... ** Changed in: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: ndiswrapper => linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Kernel Network Team -- ndiswrapper - bootloading failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133906] Re: ndiswrapper - bootloading failed
Oh, forgot to mention that blacklisting the ndiswrapper module still resulted in bootup deadlocking. But, manually deleting '/lib/modules/2.6.22-10-generic/ubuntu/misc/ndiswrapper/ndiswrapper.ko' allowed the system to boot properly... -- ndiswrapper - bootloading failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135071] Re: MP4Box double-free/heap corruption
** Attachment added: "poster.mov" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9012289/poster.mov -- MP4Box double-free/heap corruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135071] Re: MP4Box double-free/heap corruption
** Attachment added: "poster.mov.2pass.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9012291/poster.mov.2pass.log -- MP4Box double-free/heap corruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135071] MP4Box double-free/heap corruption
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gpac Tried to encode this video using podencoder, which makes a call to MP4Box, which may be corrupting itself. I have not looked at the source to see if this is a security issue or not. Tested on Feisty... podencoder is a shell script available from here: http://diveintomark.org/public/2007/06/podencoder.txt I will attach the problematic file... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ uname -a + uname -a Linux jherm-desktop 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Thu Jun 7 20:19:32 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ++ echo -ne '\033]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /tmp\007' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ podencoder poster.mov + podencoder poster.mov + version=0.20070117.0 ++ basename /usr/local/bin/podencoder + appname=podencoder + appdescription='Encode video for iPod 5G' + confname=.podencoderrc + device=/dev/dvd + outputdir=. + scratchdir=/tmp + tracks= + chapters= + naming=%d-%t + index=1 + videobitrate=450 + audiobitrate=128 + crop= + fitto4x3= + scale=320:-10 + x264encopts_required=vbv_maxrate=768:vbv_bufsize=244:nocabac:level_idc=13 + x264encopts_optional=turbo=1:me=umh:frameref=5:subq=6:partitions=all:trellis=1:direct_pred=auto:threads=auto + x264encopts= + '[' -r /home/khermans/.podencoderrc ']' + getopts :a:b:c:fi:n:o:s:t:vx: options + shift 0 + '[' -n poster.mov ']' + device=poster.mov + tty -s + : + '[' -d . ']' ++ cd . ++ pwd + outputdir=/tmp + '[' ']' ++ which mplayer + '[' -n /usr/bin/mplayer ']' ++ which mencoder + '[' -n /usr/bin/mencoder ']' ++ mencoder -oac help ++ grep faac + '[' -z ' faac - FAAC AAC audio encoder' ']' ++ mencoder -ovc help ++ grep x264 + '[' -z ' x264 - H.264 encoding' ']' ++ which MP4Box + '[' -n /usr/bin/MP4Box ']' + trap TrapBreak HUP INT TERM + '[' -f poster.mov ']' + inputfile=poster.mov ++ basename poster.mov .VOB + outputfile=poster.mov.mp4 + '[' -s /tmp/poster.mov.mp4 ']' + tracks= ++ mplayer -identify -frames 0 -vc null -vo null -ao null -nosound poster.mov + videoinfo='MPlayer 2:1.0~rc1-0ubuntu9.1 (C) 2000-2006 MPlayer Team CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+ (Family: 6, Model: 8, Stepping: 1) CPUflags: MMX: 1 MMX2: 1 3DNow: 1 3DNow2: 1 SSE: 1 SSE2: 0 Compiled with runtime CPU detection. Can'\''t open joystick device /dev/input/js0: No such file or directory Can'\''t init input joystick mplayer: could not connect to socket mplayer: No such file or directory Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remote control. Playing poster.mov. Quicktime/MOV file format detected. ID_VIDEO_ID=0 VIDEO: [rle ] 524x360 24bpp 15.000 fps0.0 kbps ( 0.0 kbyte/s) ID_FILENAME=poster.mov ID_DEMUXER=mov ID_VIDEO_FORMAT=rle ID_VIDEO_BITRATE=0 ID_VIDEO_WIDTH=524 ID_VIDEO_HEIGHT=360 ID_VIDEO_FPS=15.000 ID_VIDEO_ASPECT=0. ID_LENGTH=0.07 == Forced video codec: null Opening video decoder: [null] Null video decoder VDec: vo config request - 524 x 360 (preferred colorspace: BGR 24-bit) VDec: using Planar YV12 as output csp (no 0) Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied. VO: [null] 524x360 => 524x360 Planar YV12 Selected video codec: [null] vfm: null (NULL codec (no decoding!)) == ID_VIDEO_CODEC=null Audio: no sound Starting playback... Exiting... (End of file)' ++ echo 'MPlayer 2:1.0~rc1-0ubuntu9.1 (C) 2000-2006 MPlayer Team CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+ (Family: 6, Model: 8, Stepping: 1) CPUflags: MMX: 1 MMX2: 1 3DNow: 1 3DNow2: 1 SSE: 1 SSE2: 0 Compiled with runtime CPU detection. Can'\''t open joystick device /dev/input/js0: No such file or directory Can'\''t init input joystick mplayer: could not connect to socket mplayer: No such file or directory Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remote control. Playing poster.mov. Quicktime/MOV file format detected. ID_VIDEO_ID=0 VIDEO: [rle ] 524x360 24bpp 15.000 fps0.0 kbps ( 0.0 kbyte/s) ID_FILENAME=poster.mov ID_DEMUXER=mov ID_VIDEO_FORMAT=rle ID_VIDEO_BITRATE=0 ID_VIDEO_WIDTH=524 ID_VIDEO_HEIGHT=360 ID_VIDEO_FPS=15.000 ID_VIDEO_ASPECT=0. ID_LENGTH=0.07 == Forced video codec: null Opening video decoder: [null] Null video decoder VDec: vo config request - 524 x 360 (preferred colorspace: BGR 24-bit) VDec: using Planar YV12 as output csp (no 0) Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied. VO: [null] 524x360 => 524x360 Planar YV12 Selected video codec: [null] vfm: null (NULL codec (no decoding!)) == ID_VIDEO_CODEC=null Audio: no sound Starting playback... Exiting... (End of file)' ++ grep '^ID_LENGTH' ++ sed -e 's/^.*=//' -e 's/[.].*//' + inputlength=0 + '[' -n 0 ']' ++ basename poster.mov .VOB + avioutput=/tmp/poster.mov.temp ++ basename poster.mov .VOB + mencoderlog=/tmp/poster.mov.mencoder.log ++ basename poster.mov .VOB + mencoderpasslogfile=/tmp/poster.mov.2pass.lo
[Bug 135071] Re: MP4Box double-free/heap corruption
** Attachment added: "poster.mov.mencoder.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9012292/poster.mov.mencoder.log -- MP4Box double-free/heap corruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
So is it officially in Gutsy now? Can I "sudo aptitude update && sudo aptitude install metasploit3" ?? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
On 8/27/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not yet, I have uploaded to my PPA, (not sure the status of that system > yet). I will upload to REVU now...time to face the fire. I know some of the packaging people at Canonical/Ubuntu. If they give you a hard time, mention Kristian Erik Hermansen from Cisco aka "The Clonezilla Dude" :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
On 8/27/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** Changed in: ubuntu >Status: In Progress => Fix Committed I just updated my Gutsy install, but I don't see it. Has it made it into multiverse yet? This is the last day. Do you want me to get on #ubuntu-motu and coordinate this with you? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] metasploit rejected for Ubuntu multiverse due to many issues outside our control (in your hands now)...
* Now talking on #ubuntu-motu
* Topic for #ubuntu-motu is: Ubuntu Masters of the Universe:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU | Want to get involved with the MOTUs?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | http://ubuntu.joejaxx.org/
- TOP 10 Uploaders/Packages | REVU is back up on a new box at the same
url. | Gutsy new package freeze is 30 August
* Topic for #ubuntu-motu set by ScottK at Mon Aug 27 01:40:02 2007
* #ubuntu-motu :[freenode-info] if you need to send private messages,
please register: http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#privmsg
got a new packages, metasploit3
has justin wray come by to try adding it yet?
bug marked as FIX COMMITED
if anyone has this info, please contact me
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
looking to get metasploit into multiverse for Gutsy,
package was made earlier
thanks...
* jml has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
* jml ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined
#ubuntu-motu
* jdong has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
* mayday_jay has quit ("Leaving")
* TheMuso has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
* elkbuntu has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
* blackskad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #ubuntu-motu
* elkbuntu_ is now known as elkbuntu
* vil has quit ("Leaving.")
* jml has quit ("Ex-Chat")
* jml ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined
#ubuntu-motu
* Paddy_EIRE has quit (""so shave your face with some mace in the dark"")
khermans_: Didn't that have crazy licencing problems?
RAOF, yeah but its all worked out
Ah, cool.
RAOF, we found that basiclaly anything can be placed in
multiverse if it allows redistribution
What bug is marked as fix committed, incidentally.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/102212
Launchpad bug 102212 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] Metasploit
Framework 3.0 (multiverse)" [Wishlist,Fix committed]
so i am wondering when the package will be installable form apt
i updated to latest Gutsy, apt update, but dont see it
* gusguus has quit ()
if you find out, please let me know
i am damn tired, moving from boston to san francisco, got
tons to do tonight and tomorrow
but i wanted to make sure this was all set since cutoff
date is tomorrow
khermans_: Aaah, so it's actually on REVU now, presumably.
the 30th... for multiverse new package
REVU ?
khermans_: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=121
i am reading the second hit
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU
hrmm i dont see it in there...
* ScottK2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #ubuntu-motu
oh ok nm
it is in there
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=121
khermans_: It looks like it needs some work.
RAOF, a few things, but not much
* ceros_ has quit (Remote closed the connection)
the errors from linda are warnings, intentionally we left them in
lintian warnings
it is complaining about .svn directories
So repack the tarball
SteveA, no we want the svn entries in the release
Installing files to /usr/local is a very bad thing, too.
due to the nature of the package, it needs security
updates, so leaving the .svn for updating is ideal
RAOF, yeah that needs ot be ficxed
justin was not supposed to upload a pakcage with /usr/local
khermans_: That's *BAD*.
SteveA, whats bad?
I'm not SteveA
.svn?
StevenK, ..
Do NOT encourage users to update installed packages using SVN.
StevenK, but i think you are missing the point
StevenK, metasploit is a security tool
* khermans has quit (Remote closed the connection)
khermans_: I don't imagine he is.
there will not be a new release for every update
* khermans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/cisco/x-7f64be9a20688e95) has joined #ubuntu-motu
StevenK, the point is we could remove .svn, but it would
make the package pretty much useless
6 month old security exploits are too old
But there are better ways than using SVN ...
* jussio1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #ubuntu-motu
StevenK, yes, but not for a package with restrictive licensing
we cant modify and make an auto-update feature
Ways that don't make baby Jesus cry, for example.
StevenK, ideally yes, but this is multiverse world
StevenK, i understand the reasons for why this is bad
fully...
so let me know how you would do it?
* ScottK2 doesn't understand why the fact that it's multiverse makes
it less bad.
Agreed.
ScottK2, just means we have less control...
khermans_: If the package in useless as shipped, why would we ship it?
khermans_: Who is the "we" in that statement?
* Hobbsee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/member/hobbsee) has joined #ubuntu-motu
RAOF, its not *useless*, but just old and outdated
I seriously doubt anyone would advocate that package.
ScottK, "we" are people modifying the package
or maintaining it
StevenK, how can we make it advocated?
StevenK, what needs to be fixeD?
we will work with whatever it needs to get there
But not using methods that are crack-addled?
StevenK, crack-addled?
Yes. Updating installed packages using SVN is utter crack.
StevenK, do you know what metasploit is?
StevenK, for normal packages i would agree
lets say its microsoft tuesd
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
I agree with everything you mentioned here, especially braking up the packages. I am actually glad that Ubuntu is rejecting it :-) it shows me that people care about what packages make it into the repositories and results in a high quality system for the users. I am a long time user since Warty :-) So, looks like we need to puch this back to the MSF team so they can clean up their act. They may not even want to, and for that, we can do nothing. So, for myself, I will just continue pulling down sources manually until they work out a new license and/or ways to deal with these issues. They may not care, since it is their tool for their use, and we have the fringe benefit of being able to use it. Oh well...we tried. I won't work on this any more. I'll let you guys take over if you like. The MSF guys don't seen to have time or want to fix these things, at least as far as I can tell. Maybe they do, but they don't care if it makes it into a distro or not... On 8/29/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I said that .svn dirs must be removed ;) > A package for being accepted must be lintian *clean*, so i think, as i prev > said: > 1) we get a good package from dev team > 2) we get an execption from ubuntu-dev > > Completely agree, we were just trying to see if we could get past this > for the time being. > > I think the best solution is as follows: > > 1) We split metasploit into the following packages - > * metasploit-core (Containing all the core components, including CLI) > * metasploit-web (Containing all of the msfweb files) > * metasploit-gui (Containing all of the msfgui and needed files) > * metasploit-data (Containing all exploits, modules, etc.) > > 2) Offer a way to automatically update the exploits and modules only > (leaving core, web, and gui to be updated in future releases or with > security concerns). Although we need to discuss how this should be > approached, specific SVN, repackaging to the archive, a download script, > etc. > > The problem again, is how to we gain the ability to do such. The > options are MSF distributes the upstream package as we have outlined > above, or they allow an exception to the license that grants Ubuntu the > right to modify the package and distribute in the way stated above. > > But it is a long shot that they would repackage just to please one distro > (even though other distros could benefit from such a release). > Worse it is unlikely any license exception or change will be seen until the > next major release which should be accompanied by a new license. > > Which leaves us hanging without a metasploit release again...feedback? > > I wonder if the MSF team would be willing to create a separate SVN trunk > for Ubuntu specifically, in which they release under the layout above? > > Thanks, > Justin M. Wray > > -- > [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: Fwd: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
OK, sounds good. Like I said, I don't have much time to deal with it right now as I am moving so San Francisco. keep me posted if you guys make any significant progress (ie, they fix it on their end or rework the license). metasploit is a tool by them, for them, and we have the benefit of seeing the code and using it for free. they have no obligation to change anything to suit a distro's needs. just keep that in mind ;-P On 8/30/07, Justin M. Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just an update, we are working with the metasploit team, to hammer out some > of the issues with the current package, etc. > > Please see the below email for communication between myself and the > team-lead. > > Thanks, > Justin M. Wray > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Justin Wray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Aug 30, 2007 10:01 AM > Subject: Re: Fwd: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework > 3.0 (multiverse) > To: H D Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Moore: > > With your permission, I would like to post your comments (as well as > mine) to our "bug" (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/102212 ) so > others outside of this thread (including the package approvers) can keep > track of our status. > > On 8/29/07, H D Moore < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Justin, > > > > We can likely help with some of these in the future, but there are some > > things that we should clarify: > > > I appriciate your willingness to help, and look forward to working with > you and the rest of the metasploit team. > > 1) We will continue to use Subversion as a system for performing online > > updates. This means any distribution will always contain .svn > > directories. One solution, for a packager, is to give each user their own > > Metasploit 3 installation and provide a script which extracts this > > package and configures PATH/symlinks during the first use. This is how > > Metasploit 3.1 will work on Windows and a simple way to avoid having > > Subversion modify system-wide directories. > > > I like the idea of each user having their own installation. Not only > does it alleviate any issues implied by SVN and system-wide directories, but > it also allows each user to keep their own patch level, and more importantly > their own exploits. This then allows them to download third-party exploits > (milw0rm and the like) and even write their own, without the fear of > interfering with other users on the system. As such I will see what we can > do about packaging metasploit in such a way, and at the same time keep the > SVN update ability. > > 2) The license may change in the future, but we have no timeline set and > > no requirements to be compatible with debian-legal. For what its worth, > > our license was written by a lawyer and then reviewed again by a second > > legal team as a sanity check. The license stipulations are standard for > > EULAs and are not in line with what most folks consider open source. We > > understand that this doesn't make packaging easy, but allowing other > > people to distribute our software has not been a priority. > > > This makes perfect sence, as does the motive behind such a restrictive > license. However, this will cause the license to fall under the non-free > category. Which requires a bit more user interaction and fore-thought in > order to install. Thus it may scare some users away from trying metasploit, > then again, if they do not know what metasploit is, they will most likely > not be using it in the first place. Which I do not see as a bad thing. > > The major license issues we are having: > * Limited ability to redistribute > * The inability to redistribute changes (patches, etc) > > I understand that redistribution has not been a priority, and this > honestly is a bunch of bureaucracy that hinders productivity, all licenses > are. But allowing distributions (Ubuntu, Fedora, Suse, Backtrack) the > ability to package should be something that is looked at, when the next > license review comes along. The majority of users (even those who use > metasploit) are far more comfortable installing packages from the > distributions repositories. Some will go as far as requesting an > application to be packaged and added to the distribution before they will > install. It allows the user to keep a clean system and easily update all > the applications. Dependencies are handled, updates are provided, and > configuration complete, it makes installation painless. > > I also understand the wish to protect metasploit from re-branded and > re-packaging. But there is ways to allow distribution of changes, while > still retaining original copyright, name/branding, and maintainers etc. > Thus protecting metasploit from thief but still allowing Ubuntu and others > to make needed changes in order to have metasploit integrate cleanly into > the distribution. > > 3) Splitting the package in a way that cor
[Bug 122608] Re: xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5
If you could submit a backtrace from the automated crash tool (apport), that would be helpful in getting at why this is occurring...thanks! ** Changed in: xfce4-mixer (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/22/07, Kristian Hermansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, let's go for option two. How about you whip up a script to make > the changes you propose, so that all the MSF devs need to do is run > it, and then we have the package just as we want. How does that > sound? Do you want to write it or have me do it? I don't care, > either way... I took the liberty of cleaning up metasploit3 and wrote a script to help. Surely there are bugs, but let me know if it makes lintian complain less. If you have any questions let me know. Let's get metasploit3 into ubuntu asap! I think hdm will like it if we can just put everything into this one script and he can check out svn and run it, then make a tar.gz. Let me know if you need any help with the next step. I want to get this going quickly. Thanks dude! -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105763] [needs-packaging] fwknop
Public bug reported: http://www.cipherdyne.org/fwknop/ fwknop stands for the "FireWall KNock OPerator", and implements an authorization scheme called Single Packet Authorization (SPA) that is based around iptables and libpcap. SPA requires only a single encrypted packet in order to communicate various pieces of information including desired access through an iptables policy and/or complete commands to execute on the target system. By using iptables to maintain a "default drop" stance, the main application of this program is to protect services such as OpenSSH with an additional layer of security in order to make the exploitation of vulnerabilities (both 0-day and unpatched code) much more difficult. With fwknop deployed, anyone using nmap to look for sshd can't even tell that it is listening; it makes no difference if they have a 0-day exploit or not. The authorization server passively monitors authorization packets via libcap and hence there is no "server" to which to connect in the traditional sense. Access to a protected service is only granted after a valid encrypted and non- replayed packet is monitored from an fwknop client. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: needs-packaging ** Tags added: needs-packaging ** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- [needs-packaging] fwknop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105908] cannot add large files to data DVD project
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnomebaker ii gnomebaker 0.6.0-7ubuntu1 To reproduce this, start a new data DVD project. Then, try to add a large file to the DVD project. It will not do anything. However, adding small files does work. The file i tested was 3.8 GB zip file... ** Affects: gnomebaker (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- cannot add large files to data DVD project https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 104968] Re: Amarok consumes 100% Processorpower
Thanks for the info. So, can you quit out of amarok and then try to determine what process is slowing the system down? Are you sure it is CPU utilization and not disk utilization? Here are some commands to try in the terminal. After you close amarok (is it still running in the background?): $ ps -e | grep -i amarok $ top What process seems to be using CPU after you close amarok? It is also a possibility that there is a bug in some other app (KDE?) that gets triggered by amarok. Le tme know if amarok is still running after you close it, and we'll make some progress... -- Kristian Hermansen -- Amarok consumes 100% Processorpower https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104968 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for amarok in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 104768] Re: "Show hidden files and folders" preference requires restart
On 4/12/07, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What version of Ubuntu do you use? Do you use the default nautilus > configuration? Feisty, default config... -- Kristian Hermansen -- "Show hidden files and folders" preference requires restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104768 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 105716] Re: zip crashes when temporary output file exceeds 2GB
On 4/13/07, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I concur that this does not look like a security problem. NB that this > is not a segfault, but signal 25, which is > > SIGXFSZ 25,25,31CoreFile size limit exceeded (4.2BSD) Signal 25 (among others) is not labeled in the man file for kill. SIGXFSZ is listed, but not the corresponding number. Maybe I will file another bug againt kill to get those numbers added, or is there some more common place that lists the signal and corresponding value? -- Kristian Hermansen -- zip crashes when temporary output file exceeds 2GB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 104768] Re: "Show hidden files and folders" preference requires restart
On 4/13/07, Marcel Ibes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I confirm that I noticed this behaviour in Feisty, beta. > On the configuration part: I changed the preference to show files as lists > rather than icons. No other settings were changed. I also changed this option. Sorry, I thought I was with the defaults. So, maybe this issue only apearrs when showing as lists? rather than icons? -- Kristian Hermansen -- "Show hidden files and folders" preference requires restart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104768 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107831] Re: Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX
>From the various accounts of the issue, some different than others, I am uncertain still exactly what the issue is. All I know is that there are more than enough complaints to move this to someone's queue for inspection. I am sending to Ubuntu Desktop bugs. If there is a better place for it, then please suggest so. Hopefully this issue will be resolved... ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info => Confirmed ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs -- Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 107374] Re: adding new entries to alacarte has no effect
On 5/29/07, Damiano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I launched alacarte as root user and it did inprouve over the early attempt > from the graphic launcher. > Then, i made sure that the home dir was with correct ownership > chown -R damiano damiano > and magically the menu where behaving correctly. > So, check if ownersip of files is correct. Good to know. I did this on a standard installation, so I don't believe I changed the permissions. However, if someone with a clean default installation can retest this soon, then we can verify that. I will leave the bug open for a short time until someone with a clean system can either confirm or deny the bug. Thanks for the info... -- Kristian Hermansen -- adding new entries to alacarte has no effect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107374 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107831] Re: Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX
OK, so it definitely sounds like a packaging error. Assigning to the Ubuntu Kernel Video team. ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: grub => linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Kernel Video Team -- Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107831] Re: libwfb modules are missing from nvidia-glx-new, breaks some cards
** Summary changed: - Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX + libwfb modules are missing from nvidia-glx-new, breaks some cards -- libwfb modules are missing from nvidia-glx-new, breaks some cards https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107831] Re: libwfb modules are missing from nvidia-glx-new, breaks some cards
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 98641 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98641 Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > Kristian: > If this really is about a missing wfb driver then this is a duplicate of Bug > #98641 . Be warned though nvidia-glx-new does not support every new NVIDIA > card out there in Feisty (see > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BinaryDriverHowto/Nvidia ) The 8800 GTS is claimed to be supported, but is broken due to libwfb. The dupe you reported seems to have an ongoing issue with the fix being rejected or may be merged with another bug fix. I will mark it a dupe nevertheless. Let me know if you have any other info. As I said, the 8800 GTS is reported to not be working, yet it is claimed to be supported by the nvidia-glx-new package. This has been confirmed by numerous reports... -- Kristian Hermansen ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 98641 [nvidia-glx-new] NVidia driver missing libwfb -- libwfb modules are missing from nvidia-glx-new, breaks some cards https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118437] nemesis rip crashes on feisty amd64
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nemesis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -a Linux khermans-laptop 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Wed May 23 00:30:47 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=feisty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 7.04" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude show nemesis Package: nemesis New: yes State: installed Automatically installed: no Version: 1.32+1.4beta3-2 Priority: extra Section: universe/net Maintainer: Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uncompressed Size: 217k Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libnet0 Description: TCP/IP Packet Injection Suite The Nemesis Project is designed to be a commandline-based, portable human IP stack for UNIX/Linux. The suite is broken down by protocol and should allow for useful scripting of injected packet streams from simple shell scripts. Key features: * support for ARP, DNS, ICMP, IGMP, OSPF, RIP, TCP, UDP protocols * layer 2 or layer 3 injection * packet payload from file Homepage: http://www.packetfactory.net/Projects/nemesis/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# rm core rm: cannot remove `core': No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nemesis rip *** glibc detected *** nemesis: free(): invalid next size (fast): 0x0051b010 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/libc.so.6[0x2ad9042bcb23] /lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x8c)[0x2ad9042c026c] /usr/lib/libnet.so.0(libnet_destroy_packet+0x16)[0x2ad9039bb816] nemesis[0x40c90c] nemesis[0x40d854] nemesis[0x40fd24] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4)[0x2ad90426a8e4] nemesis(srandom+0x3a)[0x401f2a] === Memory map: 0040-00419000 r-xp 03:03 26262365 /usr/bin/nemesis 00519000-0051b000 rw-p 00019000 03:03 26262365 /usr/bin/nemesis 0051b000-0053c000 rw-p 0051b000 00:00 0 [heap] 2ad90398-2ad90399c000 r-xp 03:03 16832438 /lib/ld-2.5.so 2ad90399c000-2ad90399f000 rw-p 2ad90399c000 00:00 0 2ad9039b8000-2ad9039be000 r-xp 03:03 4226995 /usr/lib/libnet.so.0.0.0 2ad9039be000-2ad903abd000 ---p 6000 03:03 4226995 /usr/lib/libnet.so.0.0.0 2ad903abd000-2ad903abf000 rw-p 5000 03:03 4226995 /usr/lib/libnet.so.0.0.0 2ad903b9b000-2ad903b9d000 rw-p 0001b000 03:03 16832438 /lib/ld-2.5.so 2ad903b9d000-2ad903c1e000 r-xp 03:03 16950672 /lib/libm-2.5.so 2ad903c1e000-2ad903e1d000 ---p 00081000 03:03 16950672 /lib/libm-2.5.so 2ad903e1d000-2ad903e1f000 rw-p 0008 03:03 16950672 /lib/libm-2.5.so 2ad903e1f000-2ad903e3 r-xp 03:03 16950683 /lib/libresolv-2.5.so 2ad903e3-2ad90403 ---p 00011000 03:03 16950683 /lib/libresolv-2.5.so 2ad90403-2ad904032000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 16950683 /lib/libresolv-2.5.so 2ad904032000-2ad904034000 rw-p 2ad904032000 00:00 0 2ad904034000-2ad904048000 r-xp 03:03 16950674 /lib/libnsl-2.5.so 2ad904048000-2ad904248000 ---p 00014000 03:03 16950674 /lib/libnsl-2.5.so 2ad904248000-2ad90424a000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 16950674 /lib/libnsl-2.5.so 2ad90424a000-2ad90424d000 rw-p 2ad90424a000 00:00 0 2ad90424d000-2ad904394000 r-xp 03:03 16832446 /lib/libc-2.5.so 2ad904394000-2ad904594000 ---p 00147000 03:03 16832446 /lib/libc-2.5.so 2ad904594000-2ad904597000 r--p 00147000 03:03 16832446 /lib/libc-2.5.so 2ad904597000-2ad904599000 rw-p 0014a000 03:03 16832446 /lib/libc-2.5.so 2ad904599000-2ad90459f000 rw-p 2ad904599000 00:00 0 2ad90459f000-2ad9045ac000 r-xp 03:03 16823370 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 2ad9045ac000-2ad9047ac000 ---p d000 03:03 16823370 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 2ad9047ac000-2ad9047ad000 rw-p d000 03:03 16823370 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 2ad90800-2ad908021000 rw-p 2ad90800 00:00 0 2ad908021000-2ad90c00 ---p 2ad908021000 00:00 0 7fffa7115000-7fffa712a000 rw-p 7fffa7115000 00:00 0 [stack] ff60-ff601000 r-xp 00:00 0 [vdso] Aborted (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ls -lsh core 472K -rw--- 1 root root 472K 2007-06-02 18:01 core Now, I notice that when trying to compile from source, nemesis gives this error: "Nemesis will *only* work with libnet version 1.0.2a" Maybe this is related... ** Affects: nemesis (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- nemesis rip crashes on feisty amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bu
[Bug 107846] Re: cannot select mp3 encoding
This is on Feisty? Can you post some more details if you have them? When did it last work, etc. I will check it out tonight... ** Changed in: gstreamer (Ubuntu) Status: Rejected => Needs Info -- cannot select mp3 encoding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107846 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104968] Re: Amarok consumes 100% Processorpower
On 4/26/07, DaSaint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have Compiz installed but I hardly ever have it running. I never had it > running when that problem occured. > > But the problem has (magically) been fixed now. > I had it when I used the beta release of Feisty Fawn (ubuntu) But after a > kernel update it stopped happening. OK, great. I will close the issue. Feel free to reopen if you can reproduce with whatever settings caused it previously. -- Kristian Hermansen ** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andrew Ash => (unassigned) Status: Needs Info => Confirmed ** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Rejected -- Amarok consumes 100% Processorpower https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104968 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119251] software-properties-gtk should be eplaced by apt-spy backend
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-properties-gtk instead of writing a custom python solution, why isn't apt-spy utilized? I have found the python implementation to be somewhat slow and less than ideal. Does anyone else agree? $ aptitude show apt-spy Package: apt-spy New: yes State: not installed Version: 3.1-16 Priority: optional Section: universe/admin Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uncompressed Size: 197k Depends: libc6 (>= 2.5-0ubuntu1), libcurl3 (>= 7.15.5-1) Description: writes a sources.list file based on bandwidth tests Parses a list of mirrors and tests each of the mirrors for bandwidth. Writes a /etc/apt/sources.list file based on the responses it gets. ** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- software-properties-gtk should be eplaced by apt-spy backend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 119251] Re: software-properties-gtk should be eplaced by apt-spy backend
Sebastian Heinlein wrote: > What don't you like about the current implementation? Python threading is weak and slow if the servers are unresponsive. There is no way to easily call Thread,cancel (and have it honored) if something times out. You should be able to take a list of the first responders, and the methods used make use of ping, which does not work behind firewalls or places where an HTTP/FTP proxy is in use only. Additionally, it is a GUI, so what if an Ubuntu Server admin wants to get the same effect from the command line? What does he do? -- Kristian Hermansen -- software-properties-gtk should be eplaced by apt-spy backend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 105908] Re: cannot add large files to data DVD project
On 4/19/07, Chris Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This still appears to be in issue in feisty, according to the bug report > it was fixed. I assume this will be available via backports? Probably the version in Feisty does not include this fix... -- Kristian Hermansen -- cannot add large files to data DVD project https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107648] Re: The Ubuntu community is insane
Confirmed... ** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: Rejected => Confirmed ** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: Confirmed => Rejected -- The Ubuntu community is insane https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107648 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107880] Re: X doesn't start even if the safe mode is used! (Ubuntu 7.04)
Do you mean "recovery mode"? Recovery mode is single user only, with no GUI. Also, post the output of your /var/log/Xorg.0.log ** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- X doesn't start even if the safe mode is used! (Ubuntu 7.04) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107880 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107866] Re: I cannot 'see' second HDD
If it is an ATA drive, it is probably /dev/hdb. Try sudo fdisk /dev/hdb to see if you see your partitions. Or just post the output of "ls /dev/hd*". ** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- I cannot 'see' second HDD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107866 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107862] Re: All Files Deleted on vfat device
Are you sure you safely unmounted/ejected/removed the device after you wrote your files? I assume this is a USB device? ** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- All Files Deleted on vfat device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107846] Re: cannot select mp3 encoding
Did you try the gstreamer good/bad/ugly and or the lame plugin? ** Changed in: gstreamer (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- cannot select mp3 encoding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107846 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107831] Re: Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX
Can you be more specific than "doesn't work"? Does X fail to start? Do the nv and the nvidia driver both fail? ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107778] Re: adept: Failed to lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock
/var/lib/apt/lists/lock exists when apt is running. Is it possible that you had another apt process going? Can you reproduce this? Thanks. ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- adept: Failed to lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 107831] Re: Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX
On 4/20/07, redabour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > as you can see in all large Linuxboards all Users with a 8800 GTS or GTX > have the same Problems. > > Ubuntu only works at LiveCD but not after HD Install with the 8800 > Cards. Did you try installing the nvidia-glx-new package? -- Kristian Hermansen -- Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 107866] Re: I cannot 'see' second HDD
Can you run this and tell me the output? ls /dev/hd* Thanks. -- Kristian Hermansen -- I cannot 'see' second HDD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107866 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107846] Re: cannot select mp3 encoding
** Changed in: gstreamer (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info => Rejected -- cannot select mp3 encoding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107846 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 107831] Re: Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX
On 4/20/07, redabour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sure but it brings no effect because the Screen is Black as the > beginning of Booting and stays that way. OK, then can you post the output of your /boot/grub/menu.lst so that we can compare the differences between that and the LiveCD? You're probably right that it is an issue, but before I mark it CONFIRMED I want to have some configs/logs. Also, can you think of any other reason for why this is happening? -- Kristian Hermansen -- Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 107831] Re: Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX
On 4/20/07, redabour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to explain - the Effect is not only affecting the Start of X. It > beginns with the Bootroutine. It starts loading and all i can see is > nothing because Ubuntu is not choosing the correct VESA Resolution for > my System. Right, I understand that. That's why I wanted to see what was being passed to your kernel for the video settings in both your setup and the LiveCD. Does overriding the setting manually help? For instance, vga=0x311 ??? http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Framebuffer:Bootsplash:Grubsplash#Kernel_mode_numbers -- Kristian Hermansen -- Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 107866] Re: I cannot 'see' second HDD
On 4/20/07, Roger louis Gundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to make use of the second HDD, did I do something wrong? No. It just appears that you have not partitioned and formatted it. Try using gparted! Let me know if this works, so that I may close the bug. Thanks :-) sudo aptitude install gparted -- Kristian Hermansen -- I cannot 'see' second HDD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107866 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 107862] Re: All Files Deleted on vfat device
So it used to work in Edgy? -- Kristian Hermansen -- All Files Deleted on vfat device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107866] Re: I cannot 'see' second HDD
Sounds like you have got it fixed. Feel free to report future issues :-) ** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: Needs Info => Rejected -- I cannot 'see' second HDD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107866 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
