gnome-panel as a fallback

2011-06-06 Thread Eric Appleman
Hi, I was wondering under which circumstances the GTK3 gnome-panel can 
be used as a fallback for Unity or GNOME-Shell.


I'd like to know if Unity 2D will also be used for for FailsafeX sessions.

Thanks in advance.

- Eric

--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: gnome-panel as a fallback

2011-06-06 Thread Didier Roche
On lun., 2011-06-06 at 02:18 -0400, Eric Appleman wrote:
 Hi, I was wondering under which circumstances the GTK3 gnome-panel can 
 be used as a fallback for Unity or GNOME-Shell.

Hi Eric,

We are trying to build a coherent environment for ubuntu and GNOME
upstream experience.

Consequently, the plan (and what's already in oneiric) is:
* Unity and Unity-2d are installed on the CD, Unity-2d being the
fallback of Unity. In addition, each one have a separate session in gdm
(and probably will have in lightdm as well) to start them directly.

Note that this will be the case for finale only if we can have the full
unity-2d accessibility stack working in time.

* gnome-shell and gnome-panel are available in the repository.
gnome-panel can be installed separately from gnome-shell and each one
have as well a separate session in gdm/ligthdm to start them directly.
gnome-panel is the fallback of gnome-shell. (gnome-shell pulls
gnome-panel).


 
 I'd like to know if Unity 2D will also be used for for FailsafeX sessions.

Not sure about that one as different people means different things about
FailsafeX sessions. if it's session without 3D acceleration, right,
that's what is already the case in oneiric. FailsafeX as no driver has
been able to be loaded/X can't start (bulletproof X), that's more a
question for the Xorg guys :)

Cheers,
Didier


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: gnome-panel as a fallback

2011-06-06 Thread Christopher James Halse Rogers
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 09:46 +0200, Didier Roche wrote:
 On lun., 2011-06-06 at 02:18 -0400, Eric Appleman wrote:
  Hi, I was wondering under which circumstances the GTK3 gnome-panel can 
  be used as a fallback for Unity or GNOME-Shell.
 
 Hi Eric,
 
 We are trying to build a coherent environment for ubuntu and GNOME
 upstream experience.
 
 Consequently, the plan (and what's already in oneiric) is:
 * Unity and Unity-2d are installed on the CD, Unity-2d being the
 fallback of Unity. In addition, each one have a separate session in gdm
 (and probably will have in lightdm as well) to start them directly.
 
 Note that this will be the case for finale only if we can have the full
 unity-2d accessibility stack working in time.
 
 * gnome-shell and gnome-panel are available in the repository.
 gnome-panel can be installed separately from gnome-shell and each one
 have as well a separate session in gdm/ligthdm to start them directly.
 gnome-panel is the fallback of gnome-shell. (gnome-shell pulls
 gnome-panel).
 
 
  
  I'd like to know if Unity 2D will also be used for for FailsafeX sessions.
 
 Not sure about that one as different people means different things about
 FailsafeX sessions. if it's session without 3D acceleration, right,
 that's what is already the case in oneiric. FailsafeX as no driver has
 been able to be loaded/X can't start (bulletproof X), that's more a
 question for the Xorg guys :)
 

My initial thought would be that FailsafeX should use whatever fallback
would be otherwise used; Unity2D if Unity is the user's default, GNOME
classic if Shell is the user's default.

If Unity2D is unacceptably slow or likely to be broken with VESA then
that should be revisited.  IMO FailsafeX should give the user as
comfortable experience as possible for them to try to work out what went
wrong and fix it.  That's likely to be the default fallback session.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Call for testing: LightDM

2011-06-06 Thread Robert Ancell
Thanks, I've updated the information.

On 06/06/2011 04:04 AM, Steven wrote:
 Would you mind providing a little more information in the wiki about
 explicitly how to report and triage LightDM bugs? I'm assuming you
 want people to report it in Ubuntu with 'ubuntu-bug lightdm' and then
 add a tracker for the upstream project (
 https://launchpad.net/lightdm)? Thanks.

 -Stenten


 On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Robert Ancell
 robert.anc...@canonical.com mailto:robert.anc...@canonical.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 As LightDM is scheduled to be the default display manager in Oneric by
 Alpha 2 it would be awesome if we can get as many testers as possible,
 so please be a guinea pig!

 If you are using Oneric you can install it from Universe:
 $ sudo apt-get install lightdm lightdm-greeter-example-gtk

 If using Natty you can install it from the PPA:
 $ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:lightdm-team/ppa

 Expect less features than the current GDM (e.g. user switching not yet
 implemented).  I've been using LightDM exclusively for over a week
 without any major issues and others have indicated they are also using
 it without issue.

 The GUI will be replaced with something more Unity like during the
 cycle
 so look out for lacking functionality but don't worry too much
 about the
 style.

 For more information see this page:
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LightDM

 Thanks,
 --Robert


 --
 ubuntu-desktop mailing list
 ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
 mailto:ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop



-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Call for testing: LightDM

2011-06-06 Thread Kevin Huang
Great.  Is Gunnar Hjalmarsso involved in this feature implementation,
and when can we start to test it?

-- 
Best regards,

Kevin 

On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 18:01 +1000, Robert Ancell wrote:

 This feature is just not implemented yet.  It will be in Oneiric.
 
 On 06/04/2011 07:48 PM, Kevin Huang wrote: 
 
  Hi Robert,
  
  In GDM design, the display language can be set on two levels: system
  wide, which determines what shown on the login screen, and user
  specific.  It's only the user language that can be set from the
  login screen.  Since there is no language option in LightDM screen,
  I assume no user language that can be set in Oneric.  Is it correct?
  
  -- 
  Best regards,
  
  Kevin 
  
  
  On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:52 +1000, Robert Ancell wrote: 
  
   Hi all,
   
   As LightDM is scheduled to be the default display manager in Oneric by
   Alpha 2 it would be awesome if we can get as many testers as possible,
   so please be a guinea pig!
   
   If you are using Oneric you can install it from Universe:
   $ sudo apt-get install lightdm lightdm-greeter-example-gtk
   
   If using Natty you can install it from the PPA:
   $ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:lightdm-team/ppa
   
   Expect less features than the current GDM (e.g. user switching not yet
   implemented).  I've been using LightDM exclusively for over a week
   without any major issues and others have indicated they are also using
   it without issue.
   
   The GUI will be replaced with something more Unity like during the cycle
   so look out for lacking functionality but don't worry too much about the
   style.
   
   For more information see this page:
   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LightDM
   
   Thanks,
   --Robert
   
   
 
 
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: gnome-panel as a fallback

2011-06-06 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:46:51AM +0200, Didier Roche wrote:
  I'd like to know if Unity 2D will also be used for for FailsafeX sessions.
 
 Not sure about that one as different people means different things about
 FailsafeX sessions. if it's session without 3D acceleration, right,
 that's what is already the case in oneiric. FailsafeX as no driver has
 been able to be loaded/X can't start (bulletproof X), that's more a
 question for the Xorg guys :)

A session without 3D I wouldn't call 'Failsafe-X', that's more of a 2D
fallback session I suppose.

Failsafe-X traditionally has been a completely trimmed down X session
with no window manager at all, that runs with the vesa driver, and
displays a single application which conceptually you'd use to analyze or
fix X problems that prevent you from getting into a regular X session.
Originally it was envisioned as a way to redo your xorg.conf in case
something in the config was wrong, but xorg.conf-related problems are
quite rare now.

Btw, I'm trying to get away from the term 'Bulletproof-X' and use
'Failsafe-X' instead.  I think the latter term sets expectations a bit
more realistically.  ;-)

Going forward, I'm open to changing around the design a bit of
Failsafe-X to make it more relevant to the types of boot-time graphics
problems people experience these days (i.e. kernel lockups in drm and
blank-screen-on-boot problems).  It would be nice to have a bit more
window management included (window decorations at least), but there can
be advantages to keeping the session functionality to a bare minimum.

Ultimately, it needs to be very robust, and needs to not take much
ongoing maintenance or testing effort, since it's all an error handling
mechanism that needs to work in less than ideal circumstances.

Bryce

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Call for testing: LightDM

2011-06-06 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
On 2011-06-06 10:06, Kevin Huang wrote:
 On 2011-06-06 10:01, Robert Ancell wrote:
 On 2011-06-04 11:48, Kevin Huang wrote:
 In GDM design, the display language can be set on two levels: system
 wide, which determines what shown on the login screen, and user
 specific.  It's only the user language that can be set from the login
 screen.  Since there is no language option in LightDM screen, I assume
 no user language that can be set in Oneric.  Is it correct?

No. The ability to let each user set their language preferences is
primarily controlled via Language Support. It does not depend on whether
you can set the user language from the login screen.

 This feature is just not implemented yet.  It will be in Oneiric.

Good to know, Robert. Are you able to say something about e.g. the
keyboard layout and universal access?

 Great.  Is Gunnar Hjalmarsso involved in this feature implementation,

I'm not yet, but I plan to make myself involved to assist with the i18n
matters. :)  I'll try to ensure that the current functionality with
respect to languages and locales is preserved in the Oneiric release.

-- 
Gunnar Hjalmarsson

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Call for testing: LightDM

2011-06-06 Thread Kevin Huang
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 18:01 +1000, Robert Ancell wrote:

 This feature is just not implemented yet.  It will be in Oneiric.


Any target date that loco can start to test?


 
 On 06/04/2011 07:48 PM, Kevin Huang wrote: 
 
  Hi Robert,
  
  In GDM design, the display language can be set on two levels: system
  wide, which determines what shown on the login screen, and user
  specific.  It's only the user language that can be set from the
  login screen.  Since there is no language option in LightDM screen,
  I assume no user language that can be set in Oneric.  Is it correct?
  
  -- 
  Best regards,
  
  Kevin 
  
  
  On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:52 +1000, Robert Ancell wrote: 
  
   Hi all,
   
   As LightDM is scheduled to be the default display manager in Oneric by
   Alpha 2 it would be awesome if we can get as many testers as possible,
   so please be a guinea pig!
   
   If you are using Oneric you can install it from Universe:
   $ sudo apt-get install lightdm lightdm-greeter-example-gtk
   
   If using Natty you can install it from the PPA:
   $ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:lightdm-team/ppa
   
   Expect less features than the current GDM (e.g. user switching not yet
   implemented).  I've been using LightDM exclusively for over a week
   without any major issues and others have indicated they are also using
   it without issue.
   
   The GUI will be replaced with something more Unity like during the cycle
   so look out for lacking functionality but don't worry too much about the
   style.
   
   For more information see this page:
   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LightDM
   
   Thanks,
   --Robert
   
   
 
 
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop