Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?
On 19.07.2023 18:30, Juanjo Pablos via unattended-devel wrote: On 19/7/23 15:54, Johan Ho via unattended-devel wrote: I completely forgot about this for a while, what is the status of switching to Strawberry Perl? I was too afraid to break things up, so I made the modifications internally. Here is my copy. If everyone is ok, I can update the repository with this copy Yeah, I can understand that! I was also worried about making changes to perl.bat, so in the end I made another script strawberryperl.bat and used that instead. Thanks for your copy of the script, I will compare it to mine to see if there's anything I forgot. (It seems like the mailing list strips attachments, I guess anyone else following this mailing list will not get the file.) In any case, since I have a working setup for Strawberry Perl now, I am not that dependent on whether the unattended repository is up to date. But I guess the copy of perl.bat in the repository would not work for anyone who might download unattended for the first time. So it might be good to get it updated at some point. You could see if anyone else on this mailing list has any comments first, yup. Johan Ho ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?
Hello Juanjo, I completely forgot about this for a while, what is the status of switching to Strawberry Perl? I see that the perl.bat script in the repository still points to an old ActivePerl package that is no longer available for download. I tested now using Strawberry Perl in our own unattended installation, using code from this e-mail thread. It seems like everything works fine as long as I add the "ApplicationAssociationToasts" registry fixes that I mentioned. I tested both the cpan version and the "offline" version of the code (with the tar package of NetResource), both seemed to work fine. (I will probably just stick to using CPAN myself, since the rest of our unattended install requires network connection anyways.) I have only tested in Windows 10 though, I have not tested any other Windows versions. Johan Ho ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?
Den 26.06.2019 13:29, skrev Juanjo Pablos via unattended-devel: > On 26/6/19 13:15, Hofmann, Gerhard wrote: >> One little annoyance remaining, see PNG attachment. I will have to tell >> Windows that Strawberry Perl should be used to handle the PL file extension. >> But this problem I already had with ActivePerl. > > I saw this error on win10, on windows 7 seems to work just fine. Is this about the "Open with..." dialogue window that tends to pop up? (I can't see the PNG since I guess it wasn't sent to the mailing list.) I think I solved this in my Windows 10 unattended script by setting the "ApplicationAssociationToasts" entries for .pl files to 0 in the registry: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ApplicationAssociationToasts] "Applications\\Notepad.exe_.pl"=dword: "Applications\\WordPad.exe_.pl"=dword: "Applications\\perl.exe_.pl"=dword: Or if you do it directly from a script/command line: reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ApplicationAssociationToasts /v "Applications\Notepad.exe_.pl" /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ApplicationAssociationToasts /v "Applications\WordPad.exe_.pl" /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ApplicationAssociationToasts /v "Applications\perl.exe_.pl" /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f There might be some changes needed to make this work with Strawberry Perl. Hopefully this helps. Johan Ho ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
Re: [Unattended-Dev] Should I remove AdobeFlashPlayerUpdateSvc as default
Den 03.12.2018 10:12, skrev Juanjo Pablos: > Hi, > > I wonder if I should add these lines on the flash.bat script. > > +:: Delete Tasks autoupdate: > +todo.pl "SchTasks /Delete /TN \"Adobe Flash Player Updater\" /f" > +todo.pl "SchTasks /Delete /TN \"Adobe Flash Player PPAPI Notifier\" /f" > + > +:: Remove Flash autoupdate service: > +todo.pl "sc delete AdobeFlashPlayerUpdateSvc /f" > + > > > That will remove the Update services for adobe flash player. > Sounds like a good idea to me at least! I assume those commands should work the same across all Windows versions? --- Johan Ho ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
Re: [Unattended-Dev] [unattended:code] New commit by mythrix
Huh, but the DC/12 version of Adobe Reader is also 32-bit? It is installed in %PROGRAMFILES(x86)% and the executable is also called AcroRd32.exe. I'm guessing DC just checks the OS version when installing and stops if it's not at least Windows 7. That's why I thought it was just as well to call the new file by version name. Johan Ho Den 09.09.2015 13:28, skrev Juanjo Pablos: > Hi, > This change does not work on Windows XP. We need to split > adobe-reader.bat into x86-adobe-reader.bat and AMD64-adobereader.bat > > what do you think? > > > El 09/09/15 a las 13:20, Unattended, A Windows deployment system SVN > repository escribió: >> Adobe Reader DC (v12), new file. >> >> By mythrix on 09/09/2015 11:20 >> *View Changes* <http://sourceforge.net/p/unattended/code/3966/> >> >> >> >> Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in >> https://sourceforge.net/p/unattended/code/ >> >> To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit >> https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/ >> > > -- > Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! > Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools > in one place. > SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991=/4140 > ___ > unattended-devel mailing list > unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel -- Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools in one place. SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991=/4140 ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
Re: [Unattended-Dev] Dotnet Requieremen on cdburnerXP
Den 08.11.2014 12:44, skrev Juanjo Pablos: Is there any reason of why the dotnet stuff was removed from this application?: http://sourceforge.net/p/unattended/code/3686/ in my environment, i do not install the dot net stuff unless necessary. -- ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel Oh! It is possible I removed it because dotnet is preinstalled in Windows 7, so I didn't think about keeping it for Windows XP when I was editing the file. Feel free to add it back for compatibility! Johan Ho -- ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
Re: [Unattended-Dev] Dotnet Requieremen on cdburnerXP
Den 10.11.2014 12:55, skrev Juanjo Pablos: El 10/11/14 a las 10:42, Johan Ho escribió: I've been messing around so much with the dotnet.bat file that I stopped updating it to the version in the repo, that's why I missed that update. maybe the dotnet stuff is incomplete. Feel free to add any changes. Nah, truth is, I was also trying to get the dotnet.bat script to recognize Windows 7, but your solution is a bit more elegant and also more correct than mine. I might trash my own dotnet.bat and use your files later. Have to look into it when I get time. In any case, feel free to add the dotnet.bat line back to the cdbxp.bat file! Johan Ho -- ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
Re: [Unattended-Dev] Unattended logo
Hey, I'm no artist either, but I think the colors you used might be a bit too much? The blue background seems to kind of overpower the unattended title text. I made a rough edit using colors reminiscent of old terminals just as a test of other colors, but it is also a suggestion. In any case I think it might be better to use a milder background color. As for the design itself, I guess I like no 1 better! Den 22.09.2014 01:28, skrev Juanjo Pablos: Hi, I was looking on the sourceforce page for our project, and It suggest to add screenshots. And I thought that It would be nice to have a logo. I come up with an idea and I borrow a couple of svg images from the openclipart library. I am not an artist but I have a couple of logos so you can give some feedback, so we can choose one for the project. Feel free to proposed any if you feel like it. -- Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
Re: [Unattended-Dev] Time to think on Win7
that I'm trying to work out before it works completely. Johan Ho -- LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management. Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command center Diagnose problems and improve visibility into emerging IT issues Automate, monitor and manage. Do more in less time with Central http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
Re: [Unattended-Dev] DotNet.bat update
Den 06.10.12 00:10, skrev Juanjo Pablos: El 01/10/12 10:00, Johan Ho escribió: I have tested .NET v4 a few times before, but went back to v3.5 because some software we used didn't yet work with v4, and I didn't want to install both v3.5 and v4. According with this document instaling 3.5 and 4.0 seems safe. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/bb822049.aspx But it's been some time since I last tried. I see that at least CDBurnerXP should support .NET v4 now. Though I don't remember if there were other programs with compatibility issues. ok, if you want I going to upload cdbxp.bat as well. Are you going to test for compatibility with every program in the unattended scripts folder? well, I hope it tthis change breaks something people will tell. Apparently the ODF addon we install for Office 2010 only works with .NET 3.5 (or .NET 2), and there are no updates available for that addon. http://sourceforge.net/projects/odf-converter/ But that is the only program we have in our unattended installation that seems to have an issue with installing only .NET 4.5. I'll just roll back the .NET script in my own unattended installation, I'm sure this is not reason enough to roll it back on the unattended repository. Johan Ho -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
Re: [Unattended-Dev] Time to think on Win7
Den 21.09.12 02:34, skrev Juanjo Pablos: Hi, I just saw that win7 had become Nº1 in the operations Systems market share. http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=10 I do not see myself with enough time to accomplish this task. So I beg for some help on this matter. -- Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel I also recently started trying to get unattended installation of Windows 7 to work. I found this old post on the unattended info mailing list: http://www.mail-archive.com/unattended-info@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09116.html I got as far getting the WinPE 3.0 boot image up and running, but I need to focus on other projects right now. Anyways, it did sound like they got it to work. Johan Ho -- Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
Re: [Unattended-Dev] DotNet.bat update
Den 29.09.12 00:01, skrev Juanjo Pablos: Hi, I am getting from time to time some app that needs a Dotnet 4.0 update. I wonder if our dotnet.bat file is a bit incomplete: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/unattended/browser/trunk/install/scripts/dotnet.bat can anyone tell me what other patches do we need to apply on this file? Thanks I have tested .NET v4 a few times before, but went back to v3.5 because some software we used didn't yet work with v4, and I didn't want to install both v3.5 and v4. But it's been some time since I last tried. I see that at least CDBurnerXP should support .NET v4 now. Though I don't remember if there were other programs with compatibility issues. Are you going to test for compatibility with every program in the unattended scripts folder? Johan Ho -- Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
Re: [Unattended-Dev] Thunderbird and Firefox ESR (Extended Support Release)
Huh strange, I had subscribed to the e-mail digest for this mailing list, but I didn't get any of your replies! Couldn't even find any mention of them in our maillog. Tried turning off digest mode for now. Anyways, I decided to try out Thunderbird 11, but had some problems with lagging possibly whenever it was checking for new mail. Either that or when the Lightning calendar addon updated the calendars. So now I'm downgraded to Thunderbird 10 ESR to see if it has less lag. I was thinking of using something like thunderbird_esr.bat and firefox_esr.bat for the file names, but do you think it's better to use thunderbird10.bat and firefox10.bat to separate the different versions even more? Johan Ho -- For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 ___ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
