revlet newbie questions

2010-02-19 Thread Chris Sheffield
So I'm just now playing with revlets, and was hoping to be able to convert an 
existing desktop app to a revlet, just as kind of a proof of concept thing. So 
far I'm striking out. Running on a Mac, OS X 10.6.2, it's totally locking up 
Firefox and, while Safari doesn't lock up, the revlet doesn't load properly. I 
just get a blank screen.

This is a fairly complex desktop app, basically a front end to a mysql 
database, so I'm sure there is simply code in there that will not run in a 
revlet. So I'm wondering, is there a good, single source out there somewhere 
that lists what works and what doesn't work in a revlet? Things to avoid in 
revlets? One thing I discovered is that the go stack command is supported in 
a revlet, but I can't seem to make it work unless I use the go stack in 
window form. Is that the only way to do it?

This app consists of several stack files, not substacks of one main stack, but 
rather several main stack files that are opened and closed depending on what 
the user is doing. Is that a problem in a revlet? Is it necessary to build each 
stack file into a revlet, or can they remain in their regular stack file and 
still be loaded using go stack from the first stack, which would be built as 
a revlet?

I've noticed in the Rev documentation that the Class column lists whether or 
not handlers work in a revlet, but is there some way to filter  the list? I 
don't seem to be able to. The search field seems to only search on the 
handler/property names.

What would be really nice, and I suppose I could do this myself if I had the 
time right now, would be a little plugin for Rev that could scan through an 
open stack and spit out a list of the incompatilities with revlets that 
appear in that stack. Any takers? If not, can someone point me to a 
step-by-step revlet guide? Hopefully I'm not asking too much. :-)

Thanks,
Chris


--
Chris Sheffield
Read Naturally, Inc.
www.readnaturally.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: revlet newbie questions

2010-02-19 Thread Sarah Reichelt
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Chris Sheffield cmsheffi...@gmail.com wrote:
 So I'm just now playing with revlets, and was hoping to be able to convert an 
 existing desktop app to a revlet, just as kind of a proof of concept thing. 
 So far I'm striking out. Running on a Mac, OS X 10.6.2, it's totally locking 
 up Firefox and, while Safari doesn't lock up, the revlet doesn't load 
 properly. I just get a blank screen.

 This is a fairly complex desktop app, basically a front end to a mysql 
 database, so I'm sure there is simply code in there that will not run in a 
 revlet. So I'm wondering, is there a good, single source out there somewhere 
 that lists what works and what doesn't work in a revlet? Things to avoid in 
 revlets? One thing I discovered is that the go stack command is supported 
 in a revlet, but I can't seem to make it work unless I use the go stack in 
 window form. Is that the only way to do it?

 This app consists of several stack files, not substacks of one main stack, 
 but rather several main stack files that are opened and closed depending on 
 what the user is doing. Is that a problem in a revlet? Is it necessary to 
 build each stack file into a revlet, or can they remain in their regular 
 stack file and still be loaded using go stack from the first stack, which 
 would be built as a revlet?


This would concern me. Can you check that the extra stack files are
actually compiled into the revlet. Could the lock up be happening when
an external stack file should be loading?

At the moment, you can only open a new stack in the same window,
unless you make multiple revlets in which case they can open in the
same browser window so long as you set the instance IDs to the same
number. There is an example on the revWeb site on how to do this.

Cheers,
Sarah
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: revlet newbie questions

2010-02-19 Thread J. Landman Gay

Chris Sheffield wrote:

So I'm wondering, is there a good, single source
out there somewhere that lists what works and what doesn't work in a
revlet? Things to avoid in revlets?


I don't think there is a comprehensive reference yet, since the revlet 
engine is still being revised and some limitations may be lifted 
provided work-arounds can be implemented. A big part of the problem is 
how various browsers handle different things, and some capabilities just 
aren't possible with current browser implementations.


What I know about so far are:

1. Only one active window at a time, as both you and Sarah noted. You 
can alternately display more than one window in the same browser page. 
But opening an external (secondary) window is not currently possible. RR 
was looking into the new Firefox release to see if that would allow such 
a thing, but even if it does, IE and/or Safari may not. So to be safe, 
don't use more than one revlet window.


Ask and Answer dialogs were hacked to allow display, since so many 
stacks use those, but it's a hack that still isn't perfect. In 
particular, the user must manually focus on the window by clicking in it 
before any objects inside will activate.


2. Custom cursors: not supported. This includes cursors the Rev engine 
uses (busy, watch, etc.) For now, we only have the default browser cursor.


3. Quicktime and CoreImage visual effects are not supported. QuickTime 
players are only supported in alwaysBuffer mode - this means the 
controller will not work.


On the up side, there have been a few threads here about reading QT 
movies or other files from the local hard drive. No one was able to do 
it, and the work-around for regular files was to use URL syntax to put 
the file into the revlet. I've since found out that if you use a fully 
qualified file reference, you can retrieve QT movies from the local 
drive, and I think other files as well.


Don't use normal Rev file references (i.e.: user/folder/file.mov). 
Instead, use a fully qualified file reference similar to an http reference:


  file:///user/folder/file.mov -- note the 3 slashes, indicating localhost

If you refer to QT files that way they can be used as the filename for 
players in revlets.


This discrepancy is due to the automatic relative referencing that Rev 
uses when looking for files on disk. They are going to fix that so that 
in the future we can use file references we're used to for local file 
access in revlets. For now, the above works. You still can't play movies 
with an active controller though, but you can use start and stop 
player commands normally to manage playback.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Dumb Newbie Questions -- 4 of N

2009-05-04 Thread Richmond Mathewson
As we are now getting postings about 'shell access' (err, something 
about turtles?),
and 'termite eradicators' (err, debuggers?), as well as discussions 
about how the
programming language/IDE we all know and love (err, xTalk, RevTalk, 
Transcript,
Revolution) came to be the way it is; how long is it until we see people 
taking sides
in terms of Creationism (all done in one fell swoop by Bill Atkinson) 
and Evolution?


There were even a few postings (Judy ???) a while back about 'the dark 
lord', a.k.a.

the lord of light.

I would favour a much neglected 19th century theory, where after a 
benign deity
sets the ball rolling, s/he returns in the form of various 
incarnations/avatars to

gently give things a corrective nudge in the desired direction.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 4 of N

2009-05-04 Thread Judy Perry

Say what?!?

(I've not had my caffeine yet!)

Judy

On Mon, 4 May 2009, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

There were even a few postings (Judy ???) a while back about 'the dark lord', 
a.k.a.

the lord of light.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 4 of N

2009-05-04 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Judy Perry wrote:

 Say what?!?

Judy, consider this just another stop on the magical mystery tour, as
Colin H so amusingly posted recently.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 4 of N

2009-05-04 Thread Richmond Mathewson

Umm:  http://mail.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2009-March/121144.html

Because Scott Raney had absolutely no use for it and lied that sound
channels and/or HC-like musical scripting couldn't be supported under
Windows IIRC.
And I'm still plenty steamed about that.

sounds like a touch of 'the dark lord' there.  :)

Judy Perry wrote:

Say what?!?

(I've not had my caffeine yet!)

Judy

On Mon, 4 May 2009, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

There were even a few postings (Judy ???) a while back about 'the 
dark lord', a.k.a.

the lord of light.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 4 of N

2009-05-04 Thread Judy Perry

Magical Mystery Tour indeed...

On Tue, 5 May 2009, Richmond Mathewson wrote:


Umm:  http://mail.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2009-March/121144.html

Because Scott Raney had absolutely no use for it and lied that sound
channels and/or HC-like musical scripting couldn't be supported under
Windows IIRC.
And I'm still plenty steamed about that.

sounds like a touch of 'the dark lord' there.  :)

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-03 Thread Richmond Mathewson

Coming from Scotland, on going to the USA (1993) I learnt about Hypercard
and what a 'pancake stack' was simultaneously. I Scotland we tend to eat
our drop scones individually. I have always thought of a 
Hypercard/Supercard/Metacard/RR
stack as a stack of playing cards (can't think why); having started with 
making holes

in Hollerith cards that was a fairly easy conceptual move.

And, by-the-by, in Scotland, we tend to refer to 'top shelves' when talking
about your third example. :)

As a middle-aged man, I am working extremely hard on developing either
a 'central shelf', or a 'middle stack' ! What my pupils in my school refer
to as my 'twins'.

Jim Bufalini wrote:

Jacques Hausser wrote:

  

...Every name in our pet programming
language is an analogy: you don't plow your fields, you don't fasten
your buttons, and you cannot tear your cards in little bits (sometimes
I wish to do just that ! ).
And, to mention a linked question, in my view parent script, whith
it's heritability dye, was not less logical than behavior, just
emphasising (good english?) another characteristic of the same
feature. I don't see one nickname as more logical than the other one.



And, let's not forget Stack. I mean what does that have to do with pancakes,
chimneys, or well-developed women? ;-)

Aloha from Hawaii,

Jim Bufalini

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

  


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-03 Thread Richmond Mathewson

Mind you . . .

The only real reason I can see for using a custom property as opposed
to an 'on the fly' variable is that a custom property is non-volatile.

The only real reason I can see for using a custom property as opposed
to a field is that everything moves just that much faster.

So, until I feel the need to write a stack/standalone that churns its way
through buckets of indigestable data at high speed I shall probably go
on in my own reactionary fashion with off-screen fields.



If one wishes to view a property as a container containing a value, as
well as viewing objects as containers then the container metaphor is
still valid, although, like anything else, is probably not endlessly
extensible. Once pushed to its reductio ad absurdam (which may be
nearer than we all realise) its weaknesses will show up.

Russian dolls, Russian dolls, Russian dolls . . . [ matrioshki ]

--

Ugh, back the paracetamol and the ginger tea. However, a dose of
influenza does have the saving grace that it gives one bags of time for
the sort of introspective thinking these sort of discussions require.  :)

Judy Perry wrote:

Aha!

Now THAT's something I could find useful! (celebrating little aha 
moment). Thank you!


:-D

Judy

On Sat, 2 May 2009, J. Landman Gay wrote:

Let's try something simple. Suppose you have a card with lots of 
buttons that the user can move around; maybe your script uses the 
grab command to let them drag the butons. Now you want a way to 
reset the card to its native state that puts all the buttons back to 
their original positions.


Buttons have a loc property, but that only stores the current 
position of the button at this moment, and the engine will update 
that value every time the button moves. There isn't any native 
property that tells you where the button started from, but we can 
make a custom property that does that.



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-03 Thread J. Landman Gay

Richmond Mathewson wrote:

Mind you . . .

The only real reason I can see for using a custom property as opposed
to an 'on the fly' variable is that a custom property is non-volatile.

The only real reason I can see for using a custom property as opposed
to a field is that everything moves just that much faster.


I'm curious now. If you wanted to create a moveable button scenario like 
my example does, what method would you use to store their start 
locations and move them back later?


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-03 Thread DunbarX
This is all about the name, eh, not the elegant and compact functionality?

I suppose one would make a field that contained the id's of the objects, a 
space, perhaps, the startLoc, another space and the endLoc. One line per 
object. You can then put and get all the data as needed. It is what I would do 
in HC. There, i said it.

But a customProp is SO much more elegant that I know this debate will be 
over soon. In fact, as soon as some need or other arises in the development 
process, which should be any minute now...

Craig Newman
In a message dated 5/3/09 1:22:46 PM, jac...@hyperactivesw.com writes:


 I'm curious now. If you wanted to create a moveable button scenario like
 my example does, what method would you use to store their start
 locations and move them back later?
 




**
Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the 
web. Get the Radio Toolbar! 
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown0003)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-03 Thread Richmond Mathewson

Just before I left Scotland for Bulgaria (2003ish) Klaus Major took
me to task for my distinctly in-elegant coding; and, frankly, it still
is fairly inelegant. But I'm the chap that wears second-hand clothes,
uses second-hand computers, and isn't that fussed about what people
think about him (although, oddly enough, I do care about my wife's
opinion) as long as I can achieve my aims.

If I were designing programs for an employer (rather than myself)
I would take great care about the nature of my code (a thing I have
done in the past, when I was not my own boss), in-code documentation
(so, when the number 10 bus squashed me flat my successor could
have half a chance at continuing my work) and would also wear a pressed
shirt, trousers and tie (instead of a tatty old kilt). I might, just 
possibly,

polish my shoes.  :)

This is fast becoming a 'world view' discussion, rather than one about
whether one can get away without custom properties forever (or, at
least as things stand just now).

Elegance is jolly nice, but elegance often involves more thought,
more time, and more money. Now, this Merry May Holiday (1 to 6 of May
here in Bulgaria - paid for by working several Saturdays later in the 
month),

while I have had a Merry May Influenza with a Merry May Temperature of
102 degs F I have 'belted out' a fair old number of quick 'n' dirty
standalones for LInux that will guide my log-suffering pupils through the
niceties of converting Direct into Reported Speech, Adverbs of Frequency
and Careers. Had I stopped to worry about 'elegance' I would have got
bogged down before I started. Feverish, I worked feverishly 

I also spent considerable time working with GIMP to make sure that
the imagery in my teaching programs, as well as the general GUIs
was up the the standard I expect of myself: THIS IS WHAT THE END-USERS
SEE, not my tatty code!

I am a lucky man; no boss, my own children do the beta testing, and
as I use 'tatty, old PCs' speed of code execution is not of the essence.
-

I do not dispute the elegance of custom properties, speedy code,
keeping things in one place (rather than a string of:

do fld blob
do fld blab
do fld blub

and so on, ad nauseam), but as I get paid for the time that I teach,
rather than the time I program, and I would much rather spend my
time in forny of the computer writing long, tendentious messages
like this . . .   :)   . . . and learning more about Runtime Revolution's
seemingly endless capabilities, I can't be bothered with elegant code.

sincerely, Richmond Matheswon.

dunb...@aol.com wrote:

This is all about the name, eh, not the elegant and compact functionality?

I suppose one would make a field that contained the id's of the objects, a 
space, perhaps, the startLoc, another space and the endLoc. One line per 
object. You can then put and get all the data as needed. It is what I would do 
in HC. There, i said it.


But a customProp is SO much more elegant that I know this debate will be 
over soon. In fact, as soon as some need or other arises in the development 
process, which should be any minute now...


Craig Newman
In a message dated 5/3/09 1:22:46 PM, jac...@hyperactivesw.com writes:


  

I'm curious now. If you wanted to create a moveable button scenario like
my example does, what method would you use to store their start
locations and move them back later?







**
Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the 
web. Get the Radio Toolbar! 
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown0003)

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

  


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-02 Thread Richmond Mathewson

It may be, of course, that the containers, cards and flip-book metaphor have
had their day. It is obvious in this discussion that those of us who 
have hung

on to it too literally have found ourselves confused.

However, unless we (the loyal, installed user base) and Runtime Revolution
(the people who do the 'real' work in Edinburgh) can work our way towards
another metaphor to replace the one that we are slowly finding no longer
serves our purposes we are going to find ourselves in some sort of
conceptual quagmire; and, frankly, people who take up Runtime Revolution
are going to find it less accessible.

The problem about the word 'property' is that it now seems to be being used
in 2 rather different senses, and I don't see how 'custom' can be 
classed as a

sufficiently strong adjectival modifier to justify that difference.

There is no reason that I can see to abandon the containers, cards and 
flip-book metaphor
(even if, increasingly, programmers are only using a single card) if we 
realise that:


An Object (Stack, Card, Button, Field . . . and so on) can 'contain' a 
number of things:


script
sub-ordinate objects
etc.

and, 'custom properties'.  :(

An Object can have properties (textColor, backgroundColor, visible . . . 
and so on).


The ONLY problem is that something named 'property' is something that can be
contained rather than be a property: so, either, somebody has to cook up 
a new
name for 'custom properties' (err . . . 'custom thingy' . . . err . . . 
come on, somebody
can do better than that), or, somebody has to write a fairly long bit 
about how

users have to do mental backflips.


Of course, if you did not 'cut your teeth', or, at least 'cut your adult 
teeth' (having
ruined your milk teeth on the likes of Fortran) on HyperCard and the 
containers,
cards and flip-book metaphor, and you are not distracted by the stuff 
about that

metaphor in RR's documentation, the whole problem is redundant.
---

The other problem is that I just had a look at a website marketing a
programming environment that stated:

The unique English-like language . . . [my dots]

Now, if we start using words (such as 'property') for things or ideas 
that are way off
from their standard or prototypical meanings there is a danger that we 
shall fall into
Humpty-Dumptyism (c.f. Lewis Carroll's 'Alice in Wonderland'); and the 
'unique'

part of that quote above will only serve to obfuscate rather than clarify.

---

Scott Morrow wrote:


On May 1, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Scott Rossi wrote:


You can think of custom properties as global variables that are tied to
objects, instead of variables that float around in space.


That's exactly how I think of them.  Just containers.  Except 
variables  float around in space (local space or global space rather 
than outer space), where custom properties you have to say where the 
container lives (button 3 of card 1 or stack MainWindow rather than 
in the shed)


Scott Morrow
Elementary Software

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-02 Thread Richmond Mathewson

I set up a stack with a button Holder which contains 3 custom properties:

dataDish
custardPie
sexyMessage

containing, respectively, tab-delimited data, a number, and a string.

All very straightforward . . .

However, when I tried this:

on mouseUp
 put the customProperties of btn Holder into fld fPROPS
end mouseUp

nothing happened, and, confusingly, I had to do this instead:

on mouseUp
 put the customKeys of btn Holder into fld fPROPS
end mouseUp

at which point I got a list of the names of the customProperties of
button Holder.

Dumb Q:  why do we have to use 'customKeys', while 'customProperties'
refers to something else?

'userProperties' doesn't seem particularly clearer.

'customPropertySet' made me run away into the kitchen for a strong cup
of coffee:

Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite 'em,
And little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-02 Thread Thierry


Le 2 mai 09 à 10:51, Richmond Mathewson a écrit :


However, when I tried this:

on mouseUp
 put the customProperties of btn Holder into fld fPROPS
end mouseUp

nothing happened, and, confusingly, I had to do this instead:


customProperties gives you an array !


on mouseUp
 put the customKeys of btn Holder into fld fPROPS
end mouseUp

at which point I got a list of the names of the customProperties of
button Holder.


the *names* are in fact the keys of the customproperties.


In Revolution User Guide, chapter 7.9 all this is explain quite  
well.



HTH,
Thierry

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-02 Thread J. Landman Gay

Richmond Mathewson wrote:

The ONLY problem is that something named 'property' is something that 
can be
contained rather than be a property: so, either, somebody has to cook up 
a new
name for 'custom properties' (err . . . 'custom thingy' . . . err . . . 
come on, somebody
can do better than that), or, somebody has to write a fairly long bit 
about how

users have to do mental backflips.


I don't think the shoe has dropped for you yet. *All* properties contain 
something, and all are assigned to a specific object (the assignment is 
what you are calling contained by, which probably isn't exactly the 
right concept.) Every native property has both a name and a value, and 
is attached to an object. Custom properties are no different. The native 
property called name contains a string like myName and is assigned 
to the object that has that name. The property textColor contains an 
RGB value and is assigned to a button or field you are asking about. The 
property location contains a set of 2 numbers and is assigned to the 
object at that location. The property myCustomProp contains whatever 
value you want to give it and is assigned to any object you choose.


There is no practical difference, and all are properties. The only thing 
that is effectively different is that you can invent your own property 
names, assign them to an object of your choice, and fill them with any 
value you want to store.


It really is simpler than you're trying to make it. :)

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-02 Thread Peter Alcibiades

Richmond, I think you may be making it too complicated.  You are right about
the terminology of course, it doesn't help.

I've never found any need to create a custom property of a button and find
it a bit hard to guess why one would.  But in any case, if you want to
experiment with CPs, why not just start out creating custom properties of
the stack, then you can always refer to them as 'the xxx of this stack'. 
Then putting and reading and so on works just fine in the usual way.

There is probably a lot more to it than this, but just to start out with, it
really is this simple.  Also, if all your CPs are properties of the stack
they are all in one place and will not wander off and get lost which makes
life simpler.

Peter

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Dumb-Newbie-Questions3-of-N-tp23344258p23348175.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-02 Thread J. Landman Gay

Richmond Mathewson wrote:

I set up a stack with a button Holder which contains 3 custom properties:

dataDish
custardPie
sexyMessage

containing, respectively, tab-delimited data, a number, and a string.

All very straightforward . . .

However, when I tried this:

on mouseUp
 put the customProperties of btn Holder into fld fPROPS
end mouseUp

nothing happened, and, confusingly, I had to do this instead:


As was mentioned, sets of properties are stored as arrays. If you 
inspect the array itself, you'll see your data.


Let's try something simple. Suppose you have a card with lots of buttons 
that the user can move around; maybe your script uses the grab command 
to let them drag the butons. Now you want a way to reset the card to its 
native state that puts all the buttons back to their original positions.


Buttons have a loc property, but that only stores the current position 
of the button at this moment, and the engine will update that value 
every time the button moves. There isn't any native property that tells 
you where the button started from, but we can make a custom property 
that does that. We'll call it the startLoc and each moveable button 
will need to have that property assigned to it. Before the user has a 
chance to drag anything (maybe during development, or during 
preopencard) you run a little handler that sets that property for each 
button:


on setBtnLocs
  repeat with x = 1 to the number of btns
set the startLoc of btn x to the loc of btn x
  end repeat
end setBtnLocs

Now each button has a custom property called startLoc, and the value 
of the property for each button is it's current position.


Now you're ready to grab the buttons and move them all around till 
nothing is in the right place any more. Then you can click a Reset 
button which puts them all back with this simple script:


 on mouseUp
  repeat with x = 1 to the number of btns
   set the loc of btn x to the startLoc of btn x
  end repeat
end mouseUp

Your custom property startLoc acts just like any other property. The 
only difference is that the engine doesn't create or update it, you do.


I can think of several other ways to store each button's start position, 
but none of them are this simple, and none of them tie the correct value 
to each button individually the way having a custom property does. The 
startLoc of each button becomes an integral attribute of the button just 
like its color or its name, and is the only way to accomplish this 
example with any degree of efficiency.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-02 Thread Judy Perry

Nice explanation, Jacque!

Judy

On Sat, 2 May 2009, J. Landman Gay wrote:

I don't think the shoe has dropped for you yet. *All* properties contain 
something, and all are assigned to a specific object (the assignment is what 
you are calling contained by, which probably isn't exactly the right 
concept.) Every native property has both a name and a value, and is attached 
to an object. Custom properties are no different. The native property called 
name contains a string like myName and is assigned to the object that has 
that name. The property textColor contains an RGB value and is assigned to 
a button or field you are asking about. The property location contains a 
set of 2 numbers and is assigned to the object at that location. The property 
myCustomProp contains whatever value you want to give it and is assigned to 
any object you choose.


There is no practical difference, and all are properties. The only thing that 
is effectively different is that you can invent your own property names, 
assign them to an object of your choice, and fill them with any value you 
want to store.


It really is simpler than you're trying to make it. :)

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-02 Thread Judy Perry

Aha!

Now THAT's something I could find useful! (celebrating little aha moment). 
Thank you!


:-D

Judy

On Sat, 2 May 2009, J. Landman Gay wrote:

Let's try something simple. Suppose you have a card with lots of buttons that 
the user can move around; maybe your script uses the grab command to let 
them drag the butons. Now you want a way to reset the card to its native 
state that puts all the buttons back to their original positions.


Buttons have a loc property, but that only stores the current position of 
the button at this moment, and the engine will update that value every time 
the button moves. There isn't any native property that tells you where the 
button started from, but we can make a custom property that does that.



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-02 Thread Mark Swindell

Dang, you're good, Jacqueline.
Mark

On May 2, 2009, at 9:47 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:


Richmond Mathewson wrote:

The ONLY problem is that something named 'property' is something  
that can be
contained rather than be a property: so, either, somebody has to  
cook up a new
name for 'custom properties' (err . . . 'custom thingy' . . .  
err . . . come on, somebody
can do better than that), or, somebody has to write a fairly long  
bit about how

users have to do mental backflips.


I don't think the shoe has dropped for you yet. *All* properties  
contain something, and all are assigned to a specific object (the  
assignment is what you are calling contained by, which probably  
isn't exactly the right concept.) Every native property has both a  
name and a value, and is attached to an object. Custom properties  
are no different. The native property called name contains a  
string like myName and is assigned to the object that has that  
name. The property textColor contains an RGB value and is assigned  
to a button or field you are asking about. The property location  
contains a set of 2 numbers and is assigned to the object at that  
location. The property myCustomProp contains whatever value you  
want to give it and is assigned to any object you choose.


There is no practical difference, and all are properties. The only  
thing that is effectively different is that you can invent your own  
property names, assign them to an object of your choice, and fill  
them with any value you want to store.


It really is simpler than you're trying to make it. :)

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-02 Thread Jim Bufalini
You're just TOO good at explaining things, Jacque! :-)

Jacque wrote:

 Let's try something simple. Suppose you have a card with lots of
 buttons
 that the user can move around; maybe your script uses the grab
 command
 to let them drag the butons. Now you want a way to reset the card to
 its
 native state that puts all the buttons back to their original
 positions.
 
 Buttons have a loc property, but that only stores the current
 position
 of the button at this moment, and the engine will update that value
 every time the button moves. There isn't any native property that tells
 you where the button started from, but we can make a custom property
 that does that. We'll call it the startLoc and each moveable button
 will need to have that property assigned to it. Before the user has a
 chance to drag anything (maybe during development, or during
 preopencard) you run a little handler that sets that property for each
 button:
 
 on setBtnLocs
repeat with x = 1 to the number of btns
  set the startLoc of btn x to the loc of btn x
end repeat
 end setBtnLocs
 
 Now each button has a custom property called startLoc, and the value
 of the property for each button is it's current position.
 
 Now you're ready to grab the buttons and move them all around till
 nothing is in the right place any more. Then you can click a Reset
 button which puts them all back with this simple script:
 
   on mouseUp
repeat with x = 1 to the number of btns
 set the loc of btn x to the startLoc of btn x
end repeat
 end mouseUp
 
 Your custom property startLoc acts just like any other property. The
 only difference is that the engine doesn't create or update it, you do.
 
 I can think of several other ways to store each button's start
 position,
 but none of them are this simple, and none of them tie the correct
 value
 to each button individually the way having a custom property does. The
 startLoc of each button becomes an integral attribute of the button
 just
 like its color or its name, and is the only way to accomplish this
 example with any degree of efficiency.
 
 --
 Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
 HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
 subscription preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-02 Thread Richmond Mathewson

Seems a lot clearer now! Thank you, Jacque.

Jim Bufalini wrote:

You're just TOO good at explaining things, Jacque! :-)

Jacque wrote:

  

Let's try something simple. Suppose you have a card with lots of
buttons
that the user can move around; maybe your script uses the grab
command
to let them drag the butons. Now you want a way to reset the card to
its
native state that puts all the buttons back to their original
positions.

Buttons have a loc property, but that only stores the current
position
of the button at this moment, and the engine will update that value
every time the button moves. There isn't any native property that tells
you where the button started from, but we can make a custom property
that does that. We'll call it the startLoc and each moveable button
will need to have that property assigned to it. Before the user has a
chance to drag anything (maybe during development, or during
preopencard) you run a little handler that sets that property for each
button:

on setBtnLocs
   repeat with x = 1 to the number of btns
 set the startLoc of btn x to the loc of btn x
   end repeat
end setBtnLocs

Now each button has a custom property called startLoc, and the value
of the property for each button is it's current position.

Now you're ready to grab the buttons and move them all around till
nothing is in the right place any more. Then you can click a Reset
button which puts them all back with this simple script:

  on mouseUp
   repeat with x = 1 to the number of btns
set the loc of btn x to the startLoc of btn x
   end repeat
end mouseUp

Your custom property startLoc acts just like any other property. The
only difference is that the engine doesn't create or update it, you do.

I can think of several other ways to store each button's start
position,
but none of them are this simple, and none of them tie the correct
value
to each button individually the way having a custom property does. The
startLoc of each button becomes an integral attribute of the button
just
like its color or its name, and is the only way to accomplish this
example with any degree of efficiency.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

  


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-02 Thread Jacques Hausser

Hello everybody,

Just to put my grano salis in this discussion: runrev (and its  
ancestors) evolved rather biologically and a bit erratically, like any  
organism or any natural language. Several users from time to time  
claim to put more logic in its structures. I feel it is not only  
hopeless, but totally unrealistic. A fully logic system becomes either  
immediately fossilized or evolves out from the splendidly logical  
structure of its beginning. Curstom properties CAN be properties, as  
Jacque showed so well (in an application, I have flying hummingbirds  
with CP like PerchLoc, NestLoc and so on. They are quite similar  
to the original properties). But the people who imagined CP asked  
themselves: it's any reason to limit CP to THAT, since they can be far  
more powerful ? And of course it was no good reason to limit the scope  
of this new feature.
As for the names; Darwin himself has made a rather bad choice in  
naming the natural selection Natural selection, because selection  
implies somebody acting to select organisms. Natural filter or  
Ecological sieve would have been better. Perhaps. But natural  
selection it is, and custom properties they are. It's just so, and we  
have to learn their meaning. Every name in our pet programming  
language is an analogy: you don't plow your fields, you don't fasten  
your buttons, and you cannot tear your cards in little bits (sometimes  
I wish to do just that ! ).
And, to mention a linked question, in my view parent script, whith  
it's heritability dye, was not less logical than behavior, just  
emphasising (good english?) another characteristic of the same  
feature. I don't see one nickname as more logical than the other one.


Jacques (with s), in a philosophical mood...

Le 2 mai 2009 à 22:36, Richmond Mathewson a écrit :


Seems a lot clearer now! Thank you, Jacque.



**
Prof. Jacques Hausser
Department of Ecology and Evolution
Biophore / Sorge
University of Lausanne
CH 1015 Lausanne
please use my private address:
6 route de Burtigny
CH-1269 Bassins
tel/fax:++ 41 22 366 19 40
mobile: ++ 41 79 757 05 24
E-Mail: jacques.haus...@unil.ch
***

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-02 Thread Jim Bufalini
Jacques Hausser wrote:

...Every name in our pet programming
 language is an analogy: you don't plow your fields, you don't fasten
 your buttons, and you cannot tear your cards in little bits (sometimes
 I wish to do just that ! ).
 And, to mention a linked question, in my view parent script, whith
 it's heritability dye, was not less logical than behavior, just
 emphasising (good english?) another characteristic of the same
 feature. I don't see one nickname as more logical than the other one.

And, let's not forget Stack. I mean what does that have to do with pancakes,
chimneys, or well-developed women? ;-)

Aloha from Hawaii,

Jim Bufalini

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-02 Thread François Chaplais


Le 2 mai 09 à 23:10, Jim Bufalini a écrit :


Jacques Hausser wrote:


...Every name in our pet programming
language is an analogy: you don't plow your fields, you don't fasten
your buttons, and you cannot tear your cards in little bits  
(sometimes

I wish to do just that ! ).
And, to mention a linked question, in my view parent script, whith
it's heritability dye, was not less logical than behavior, just
emphasising (good english?) another characteristic of the same
feature. I don't see one nickname as more logical than the other one.


And, let's not forget Stack. I mean what does that have to do with  
pancakes,

chimneys, or well-developed women? ;-)


and what about revolution?   :-)))
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 3 of N

2009-05-02 Thread Jacques Hausser


Le 2 mai 2009 à 23:57, François Chaplais a écrit :



Le 2 mai 09 à 23:10, Jim Bufalini a écrit :


Jacques Hausser wrote:


...Every name in our pet programming
language is an analogy: you don't plow your fields, you don't fasten
your buttons, and you cannot tear your cards in little bits  
(sometimes

I wish to do just that ! ).
And, to mention a linked question, in my view parent script, whith
it's heritability dye, was not less logical than behavior, just
emphasising (good english?) another characteristic of the same
feature. I don't see one nickname as more logical than the other  
one.


And, let's not forget Stack. I mean what does that have to do with  
pancakes,

chimneys, or well-developed women? ;-)


or hay ? It's the place to seek for the famous needle...


and what about revolution?   :-)))


Trois petits tours, et puis s'en vont,,,
A revolution is a circular move coming back to it's starting point, no ?

Metaphor is as dangerous as appealing. But you cannot do without.

Jacques


Prof. Jacques Hausser
Department of Ecology and Evolution
Biophore / Sorge
University of Lausanne
CH 1015 Lausanne
please use my private address:
6 route de Burtigny
CH-1269 Bassins
tel/fax:++ 41 22 366 19 40
mobile: ++ 41 79 757 05 24
E-Mail: jacques.haus...@unil.ch
***

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Peter Alcibiades

Judy, maybe the issue with custom properties is that they are so simple? 
There is almost nothing there to get your head around.  

The thing I found completely blocking at first was, I kept asking myself, if
they are properties, they must be properties of something, so what is it
they are properties of, and how are they properties?  I kept thinking of
properties as being some sort of quality of an object, like color or size. 
It seems incomprehensible in retrospect that it can have seemed so
confusing.  But probably it was that the name hides something very very
simple!

The way to think of them is just fields.  Except they can be these funny
fields so to speak on a stack as well as on a card.  And the syntax for
getting stuff into them or reading from them is a little different.  And
they are invisible to the user.  But that is all they are.  If you can use
fields, you can use custom properties in about 30 seconds.  Though it took
me a lot longer than I'm going to admit to, to discover this!

One dimension of whether to store data in them is to what extent you want
your users to have independent access to their data.  If you want them to be
able to find it and move it to a different program if they feel like it,
probably out-of-program storage is going to be best.  I recently found it
reassuring to know that if I were to meet my maker, my suffering earth bound
users had all their data in tab separated text files which they could get
out in a flash and transfer to the database or spreadsheet of their choice. 

Storing in custom properties means they need Rev or your program to get at
it, no?  
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/rev-dictionary-blocked-tp23316218p23329501.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Judy Perry wrote:

 I'm trying to figure out what new (to me) things are worth spending time
 on this summer (worth = useful for me) and which are not.  I honestly do
 not see myself doing 32,000 card stacks anytime soon as my little things
 are just educational aids for my kids, so I thought I'd pick custom
 properties since everyone seems to be of the opinion that they are the
 bee's knees. Howevder, I need to see an example along the lines of the
 sorts of things I'd be likely to use them for as well as an extremely
 detailed set of instructions with explanations of why as well as how.

Judy, maybe this analogy can help:

You can think of custom properties as global variables that are tied to
objects, instead of variables that float around in space.

You know how to use globals, yes?  If you script:
  global specialValues
  put a,b,c into specialValues

...you've created a global variable named specialValues that is accessible
everywhere in your stack.  And to use the contents of specialValues, you
simply declare the variable and do something with it:
   global specialValues
   answer specialValues

The above is similar for custom properties, except that you assign the
global to an object:
  set the specialValues of btn 1 to a,b,c

In scripting this, you have created a custom property of button 1 called
specialValues, and you can retrieve the contents of the property anywhere in
your stack by referencing the object to which the property is attached:
   answer the specialValues of btn 1

Notice that you need to use the word the when accessing a custom property,
the same way you would script the backColor of btn 1 or the width of btn
1.  Now, in addition to backColor and width properties, button 1 also has a
specialValues property -- a property you created.

So while a custom property is not a global variable from a semantic
standpoint, it does behave a bit like a global variable, but one that is
assigned to an object, and the object can be a control, a card, or a stack.

I think this has been stated before, but one reason I use custom properties
so often in my stacks is the values stored in them are persistent across
sessions, whereas globals need to be populated each time.  I also like the
fact that custom properties are no longer present after a stack is closed,
unlike globals which hang around in memory until they are deleted or Rev is
shut down.

Finally, the association that can be made between and object and a custom
property makes sense to me.  I can set the bouncing property of a ball
image to true or false; if I have many ball images in a stack, they can all
have the same bouncing property which I can check on an object-by-object
basis.

Hope you find this somewhat useful.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Kay C Lan
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Peter Alcibiades 
palcibiades-fi...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:


 Judy, maybe the issue with custom properties is that they are so simple?
 There is almost nothing there to get your head around.


Right!


 The way to think of them is just fields.  Except.


Except?

Scott Rossi wrote:

 You can think of custom properties as global variables that are tied to
 objects, instead of variables that float around in space.


With all due respect gentlemen, why is that for something so simple and
already understood, an analogy is used that is only tangentially related.

Judy, you know what properties are, you know how to set the text of a field,
set the textColour, get or set the height of a button/field/card/stack. You
know exactly what a property is, you've been dealing with them since your
very first HC days.

So lets say in your next Rev project you really really wished that a
field/button/card/stack had an extra property, that for you, and as far as
you can tell a whole heap of other people in education could really be
helped out if the Rev Team added this extra property to the current vast
list of properties button/fields/cards/stacks have; and so you put in an
enhancement request.

Well the fact is Rev has already granted your wish! Whatever you can
possible think of - questionText, answerText, theFirstColour,
theSecondColour, defaultLanguage, userLanguage, theWrongImage,
theRightImage, goodSound, badSound, theFemaleFormStack, theMaleFormStack,
windowsMediaPlayerDowloadURL, quickTimeDownloadURL, judyData, jacqueData,
whatever you want you can have. You name it whatever suits you and you use
it just like all the other properties you have ever dealt with.

Properties are likeproperties, they are different to fields and they are
different to globals. Just as you can create
variables/button/fields/cards/stacks and give them their own names you can
create properties and give them their own names, at which point they are
referred to as custom properties, but at the end of the day it is still just
a property and you get it and set it just like every other property you've
dealt with.

As some have stated, if you do what you do with the knowledge that you have
then customProperties aren't going to be a big deal for you, but the thing
to remember is that ANYTIME you suddenly wish Cards could remember when they
were first opened, or last visited, the answer is, they can, you can create
such a property plus any other property your heart desires.

So for someone who hasn't used custom properties the only thing to get your
head around is WHEN they could come in handy. If you are fond of using
hidden fields to store data I'd suggest considering, can you create a custom
property called theHiddedFieldText and see if you can achieve the same
results. You can, and once you do you'll have that Ah Ha moment and you wont
turn back.

HTH
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Kay C Lan wrote:

 Scott Rossi wrote:

  You can think of custom properties as global variables that are tied to
 objects, instead of variables that float around in space.
 
 
 With all due respect gentlemen, why is that for something so simple and
 already understood, an analogy is used that is only tangentially related.

In my example, I used a global analogy because 1) setting/modifying custom
properties do not inherently make any visible changes in an object, unlike
textColor or other built-in object properties; and 2) many, many years ago,
I was in a similar situation as Judy, not able to grasp the what/why of
custom properties, and this analogy is one that would have helped me out at
that time.

The same was true for me with the concept of groups/backgrounds.  Coming to
MetaCard from SuperCard, I could not for the life of me understand why
something called a background could appear *in front* of another object.
It made no sense to me.  Only after getting more entrenched in the
environment did I start  to understand the how and why of groups, and it was
many months later that Richard Gaskin provided a description that made sense
to me: a background is just a group that may (or may not) be shared across
multiple cards.

(Why something called a group can contain only a single object is another
conundrum that I won't get into now.)

It's not a question of what should be so simple, it's a question of what
helps someone grasp a concept.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Peter Alcibiades

It would be nice to hear from Judy again.  Did any of these explanations
help?  And did you try using a custom property, and did it work?

Peter

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/rev-dictionary-blocked-tp23316218p23337886.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Richmond Mathewson

Maybe I'm having conceptual problems, but a custom
property looks awfully like another container (such as a
variable or a field) rather than a property as such.

I realise that a custom property can be used as a data-source
more rapidly than a field because it doesn't come with all
the 'trappings' of an object. However, what is not clear to me
is whether I can access data stored in the custom property
of an object from a script in another, rather like the way I can
access data stored in a field on a different card to the one
I am 'calling' from.

Peter Alcibiades wrote:

It would be nice to hear from Judy again.  Did any of these explanations
help?  And did you try using a custom property, and did it work?

Peter

  


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Joe Lewis Wilkins

Richmond,

I may be all wet, but it seems to me that this custom Property thing  
is just Rev's way of saying you are able to provide a pointer/handle  
to some address in memory where all of the stuff you've put into it  
may be accessed, and do so rather easily. I said I didn't like the  
name, but that's not going to change, so??? I agree that the word  
property provides a totally different mindset.


Joe Wilkins

On May 1, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:


Maybe I'm having conceptual problems, but a custom
property looks awfully like another container (such as a
variable or a field) rather than a property as such.

I realise that a custom property can be used as a data-source
more rapidly than a field because it doesn't come with all
the 'trappings' of an object. However, what is not clear to me
is whether I can access data stored in the custom property
of an object from a script in another, rather like the way I can
access data stored in a field on a different card to the one
I am 'calling' from.

Peter Alcibiades wrote:
It would be nice to hear from Judy again.  Did any of these  
explanations

help?  And did you try using a custom property, and did it work?

Peter



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Peter Alcibiades

Yes.  You just refer to your custom property as 'the xxx of yyy' where xxx is
the name you gave it, and yyy is either the stack or the card it is a
property of.  The script in which you do this can be associated with any
object or event in the stack.

For instance, say you had a POS system and you did employee discounts.  You
might have a button with 'DISCOUNT' on it, perhaps on the order entry card. 
Your script would just do something like, on mouseup multiply the price of
the item by - and here comes the custom property - the discount of this
stack.  The button could be on any card.  Or the event could be any event
associated with the stack.  Like it could be on openCard - whichever card
would be appropriate.  When the card is opened, for instance, do something
which will show the user the warning_message of this stack.

Then you could do all the usual things, if you want them to be able to
change the discount level, you just get what they want to use, and put it
into the discount of this stack.  Or if you are keeping track of events,
you can, every time the event happens, put some record of it after the
eventlog of this stack.

This is the funny thing that drove me nuts until I suddenly saw it - there
is nothing to this, its the simplest thing in the world.  You just create
yourself a custom property using the property inspector of the stack or the
card - or I guess other objects too, though I have never done this.  And
then you put things in them, get things from them, filter them.  Whatever.

In the above example, you'd open the stack property inspector, pick the
custom properties item from the pulldown menu, and just create it,  and then
put the discount percentage in it.  Bingo!

Password, for instance.  Ask for the password and then if what is supplied
is the adminpassword of this stack let them into the admin page, otherwise
answer sorry, we got to have the correct password for this.

Its not a property in any normal sense of the word.  Its just a sort of
special field.  Yes, its a special sort of global variable as well.

But I do have the feeling that when people try to explain this to new users,
they need to do it in terms that the user already understands.  If you have
done anything, you have used a field, read a field, written to it and so on. 
So tell someone to think of the custom property as a sort of field, and they
will probably get it.  Global variables, properties, all that stuff just
made it more opaque in the beginning.  For me,

If this is wrong, one of the gurus please correct.  This is an amateur
blundering through it!

Peter


Richmond Mathewson-2 wrote:
 
  However, what is not clear to me
 is whether I can access data stored in the custom property
 of an object from a script in another, rather like the way I can
 access data stored in a field on a different card to the one
 I am 'calling' from.
 
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/rev-dictionary-blocked-tp23316218p23338734.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Mark Swindell
While property might not be the best name, I can't think of a name  
better suited, since  custom properties are persistent across  
sessions,  proprietary to an object, and the syntax is consistent with  
other object properties...  the height, the width, the visible, the  
cpWhatEver of button x.  It seems pretty simple and straightforward.   
What isn't intuitive is that a custom property can contain a stack,  
for example.  Cool, but not intuitive.   I mostly use them to keep  
variable contents or states  alive across sessions.


Mark


On May 1, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:


Richmond,

I may be all wet, but it seems to me that this custom Property thing  
is just Rev's way of saying you are able to provide a pointer/handle  
to some address in memory where all of the stuff you've put into it  
may be accessed, and do so rather easily. I said I didn't like the  
name, but that's not going to change, so??? I agree that the word  
property provides a totally different mindset.


Joe Wilkins

On May 1, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:


Maybe I'm having conceptual problems, but a custom
property looks awfully like another container (such as a
variable or a field) rather than a property as such.

I realise that a custom property can be used as a data-source
more rapidly than a field because it doesn't come with all
the 'trappings' of an object. However, what is not clear to me
is whether I can access data stored in the custom property
of an object from a script in another, rather like the way I can
access data stored in a field on a different card to the one
I am 'calling' from.

Peter Alcibiades wrote:
It would be nice to hear from Judy again.  Did any of these  
explanations

help?  And did you try using a custom property, and did it work?

Peter



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Judy Perry

Thank you, Scott.  Your explanation looks helpful :-)

Judy

On Fri, 1 May 2009, Scott Rossi wrote:


Recently, Judy Perry wrote:


I'm trying to figure out what new (to me) things are worth spending time
on this summer (worth = useful for me) and which are not.  I honestly do
not see myself doing 32,000 card stacks anytime soon as my little things
are just educational aids for my kids, so I thought I'd pick custom
properties since everyone seems to be of the opinion that they are the
bee's knees. Howevder, I need to see an example along the lines of the
sorts of things I'd be likely to use them for as well as an extremely
detailed set of instructions with explanations of why as well as how.


Judy, maybe this analogy can help:

You can think of custom properties as global variables that are tied to
objects, instead of variables that float around in space.

You know how to use globals, yes?  If you script:
 global specialValues
 put a,b,c into specialValues

...you've created a global variable named specialValues that is accessible
everywhere in your stack.  And to use the contents of specialValues, you
simply declare the variable and do something with it:
  global specialValues
  answer specialValues

The above is similar for custom properties, except that you assign the
global to an object:
 set the specialValues of btn 1 to a,b,c

In scripting this, you have created a custom property of button 1 called
specialValues, and you can retrieve the contents of the property anywhere in
your stack by referencing the object to which the property is attached:
  answer the specialValues of btn 1

Notice that you need to use the word the when accessing a custom property,
the same way you would script the backColor of btn 1 or the width of btn
1.  Now, in addition to backColor and width properties, button 1 also has a
specialValues property -- a property you created.

So while a custom property is not a global variable from a semantic
standpoint, it does behave a bit like a global variable, but one that is
assigned to an object, and the object can be a control, a card, or a stack.

I think this has been stated before, but one reason I use custom properties
so often in my stacks is the values stored in them are persistent across
sessions, whereas globals need to be populated each time.  I also like the
fact that custom properties are no longer present after a stack is closed,
unlike globals which hang around in memory until they are deleted or Rev is
shut down.

Finally, the association that can be made between and object and a custom
property makes sense to me.  I can set the bouncing property of a ball
image to true or false; if I have many ball images in a stack, they can all
have the same bouncing property which I can check on an object-by-object
basis.

Hope you find this somewhat useful.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Judy Perry

Peter,

I had to run some errands and am now attending upon the termite eradicator 
;-)


Which is to say I'm still reading these mails.

Many kind thanks to all who have responded!

Judy

On Fri, 1 May 2009, Peter Alcibiades wrote:



It would be nice to hear from Judy again.  Did any of these explanations
help?  And did you try using a custom property, and did it work?

Peter

--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/rev-dictionary-blocked-tp23316218p23337886.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Richmond Mathewson
Maybe my problem comes from taking the computer programming metaphor a 
bit too literally.


I think of properties as things that inhere in objects, some being 
necessary and some being
contingent; rather like people with functioning lungs (necessary) and 
ideas (contingent).


Now it seems that with 'custom property' I am expected to imagine 
objects that inhere in

other objects (e.g. stacks in custom properties).

Of course, once one abandons the standard metaphor and views custom 
properties as
pointers to drawers in a filing cabinet (or, even, maybe, the drawers 
themselves) everything

becomes clearer.

The term 'custom property' is misleading; it is like asking Where is 
Axminster? and then

wondering why they don't show you the bathroom.

Mark Swindell wrote:
While property might not be the best name, I can't think of a name 
better suited, since  custom properties are persistent across 
sessions,  proprietary to an object, and the syntax is consistent with 
other object properties...  the height, the width, the visible, the 
cpWhatEver of button x.  It seems pretty simple and straightforward.  
What isn't intuitive is that a custom property can contain a stack, 
for example.  Cool, but not intuitive.   I mostly use them to keep 
variable contents or states  alive across sessions.


Mark


On May 1, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:


Richmond,

I may be all wet, but it seems to me that this custom Property thing 
is just Rev's way of saying you are able to provide a pointer/handle 
to some address in memory where all of the stuff you've put into it 
may be accessed, and do so rather easily. I said I didn't like the 
name, but that's not going to change, so??? I agree that the word 
property provides a totally different mindset.


Joe Wilkins

On May 1, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:


Maybe I'm having conceptual problems, but a custom
property looks awfully like another container (such as a
variable or a field) rather than a property as such.

I realise that a custom property can be used as a data-source
more rapidly than a field because it doesn't come with all
the 'trappings' of an object. However, what is not clear to me
is whether I can access data stored in the custom property
of an object from a script in another, rather like the way I can
access data stored in a field on a different card to the one
I am 'calling' from.

Peter Alcibiades wrote:
It would be nice to hear from Judy again.  Did any of these 
explanations

help?  And did you try using a custom property, and did it work?

Peter



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Richmond Mathewson
Presumably the 'termite eradicator' is the secret code name for the 
alpha version

of the new debugger being built into Runtime Revolution 4. :)

Judy Perry wrote:

Peter,

I had to run some errands and am now attending upon the termite 
eradicator ;-)


Which is to say I'm still reading these mails.

Many kind thanks to all who have responded!

Judy

On Fri, 1 May 2009, Peter Alcibiades wrote:



It would be nice to hear from Judy again.  Did any of these explanations
help?  And did you try using a custom property, and did it work?

Peter

--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/rev-dictionary-blocked-tp23316218p23337886.html

Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Judy Perry

Thank you.  I needed that. ;-)

Judy

On Fri, 1 May 2009, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

Presumably the 'termite eradicator' is the secret code name for the alpha 
version

of the new debugger being built into Runtime Revolution 4. :)

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 2 of N

2009-05-01 Thread DunbarX
I remember when a button in HC was first (v.2.2) embellished into a 
container. This seemed silly, though the possibilities were intriguing. You 
might 
say that a new custom property, theContainerNess, was now built into this 
familiar object, and it could hold text.

So you then could get btn myBtn, and the text would appear. This is not 
what buttons were made for, but it was just a simple disconnect from an old 
habit to embrace it.

I, early on (1987), thought commands and functions ruled, and properties 
were cute and useful but inherently of a lower class. I was wrong, and ever so 
much more so given custom properties.

Craig Newman


**
Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from 
anywhere on the web. Get the Radio Toolbar! 
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown0003)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 2 of N

2009-05-01 Thread DunbarX
I remember when a button in HC was first (v.2.2) embellished into a 
container. This seemed silly, though the possibilities were intriguing. You 
might 
say that a new custom property, theContainerNess, was now built into this 
familiar object, and it could hold text.

So you then could get btn myBtn, and the text would appear. This is not 
what buttons were made for, but it was just a simple disconnect from an old 
habit to embrace it.

I, early on (1987), thought commands and functions ruled, and properties 
were cute and useful but inherently of a lower class. I was wrong, and ever so 
much more so given custom properties.

Craig Newman


**
Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from 
anywhere on the web. Get the Radio Toolbar! 
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown0003)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Judy Perry

On Fri, 1 May 2009, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
snip

Of course, once one abandons the standard metaphor and views custom 
properties as
pointers to drawers in a filing cabinet (or, even, maybe, the drawers 
themselves) everything

becomes clearer.

The term 'custom property' is misleading; it is like asking Where is 
Axminster? and then

wondering why they don't show you the bathroom.


--Well, yes, especially that last part, wherein I felt rather like I was 
being asked to interact with invisible magic things, only, when they're 
invisible how will I know them when I see them?  I mean, I literally 
didn't know what step 1 was supposed to be.  I had a vague, fuzzy notion 
of what they were supposed to do but not how they did it.


So, anyway, I did one.  Yay me!

I dunno... I still like cards.  I like things that I can see, have mass 
and/or take up space. ;-)


Many thanks again to all who replied, and special thanks to the ChatRev 
twins who displayed admirable restraint in NOT reaching through the tubes 
of the internet to strangle the life out of me ;-)


Judy
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Kay C Lan
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Mark Swindell mdswind...@cruzio.com wrote:

 While property might not be the best name, I can't think of a name better
 suited, since  custom properties are persistent across sessions,
  proprietary to an object, and the syntax is consistent with other object
 properties...  the height, the width, the visible, the cpWhatEver of button
 x.  It seems pretty simple and straightforward.  What isn't intuitive is
 that a custom property can contain a stack, for example.  Cool, but not
 intuitive.   I mostly use them to keep variable contents or states  alive
 across sessions.


Basically with you Mark except I do think that Custom Property is a very
good name :-)

IMO what isn't intuitive is when you can use them, especially use them to
your advantage. When I read the explanations by others above what I see is
people saying 'I can use them like a field (hidden)' or 'I can use them like
a global' they are not really explaining what they are, but how they have
come to use them.

Scott wrote:

In my example, I used a global analogy because 1) setting/modifying custom
properties do not inherently make any visible changes in an object, unlike
textColor or other built-in object properties;


Whilst this is generally true, there are object properties that don't have
an immediate visible effect, such as the dontSearch, travesalOn or autoTab
of a field or the acceleratorKey of a button. Stacks come with alwaysBuffer,
destroyStack and cantDelete. Then there are the really invisible properties
such as itemDelimiter and defaultFolder. If you can understand and work with
these you can work with Custom Properties.

Richmond wrote:

The term 'custom property' is misleading; it is like asking Where is
 Axminster? and then
 wondering why they don't show you the bathroom.


What? This is like saying  I put the itemDelimiter into oldDelim and am
now wondering why oldDelim doesn't contain the path to the defaultFolder.
There is nothing misleading about what a property of an object is, when you
ask for an object's property you get that property back, be it an inbuilt
property or one you've created.

Judy lamented:

--Well, yes, especially that last part, wherein I felt rather like I was
 being asked to interact with invisible magic things, only, when they're
 invisible how will I know them when I see them?  I mean, I literally didn't
 know what step 1 was supposed to be.  I had a vague, fuzzy notion of what
 they were supposed to do but not how they did it.

 So, anyway, I did one.  Yay me!

 I dunno... I still like cards.  I like things that I can see, have mass
 and/or take up space. ;-)


But you can see them, they do have mass and take up space, there is an
entire Property Inspector tab devoted to the space taken up with custom
properties you create.

You can't see the raw htmlText of a field, but if you can get your head
around how that magic works you should find custom properties a lot easier
to work with because you can look at them and see exactly what they are.

You can get and set the text of field 1 (inbuilt and visible in the PI)
You can get and set the htmlText of  field 1 (inbuilt but not visible as raw
html in the PI)
You could create the xmlText of field 1
You could create the csvText of field 1
You could create the englishText of field 1
You could create the latinText of field 1

The last four cases would be visible in the PI and could be edited from
within the PI (unlike the htmlText), they are very real, and if you fill
them with the complete works of William Shakespear, they'll take up a lot of
space.

With enlishText/latinText, you could, depending on user interaction, display
the text as is:

 set the text of field 1 to the latinText of field 1

Or, in the case of xmlText/csvText, parse the text before displaying it,
much like the Engine currently does for htmlText

put the csvText of field 1 into tempStore
replace comma with tab in tempStore
set the text of field 1 to tempStore

Again, when your Ah Ha moment comes you'll know exactly what custom
properties are, how to work with them, how to see their contents,
everything, because you have already been working with the magic of
properties and the PI for a very long time. The only magic you don't
understand right now is what you are doing right now that could be done with
custom properties.

My analogy for custom properties is they are like properties that you don't
know exist. Take the defaultMenubar for instance. You could spend years
makeing the exact same menubar for all your MainStacks and subStacks. It
works for you, they are real, you know how to amend them - it's a lot of
work in you need to add a menu item to the menuBar of 7 substacks.

When someone tells you that there's a property 'the defaultMenubar' which
allows you to build one menuBar and have it appear for any substack you know
you can use that to your advantage, you know how to use it because you've
used other properties. You'll also wish someone told you about 

Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Judy Perry

Kay,

You assume I know more than I do ;-)  And you know what happens when you 
assume...


:-P

Still, points well taken.

Judy

On Sat, 2 May 2009, Kay C Lan wrote:


You can't see the raw htmlText of a field, but if you can get your head
around how that magic works you should find custom properties a lot easier
to work with because you can look at them and see exactly what they are.

You can get and set the text of field 1 (inbuilt and visible in the PI)
You can get and set the htmlText of  field 1 (inbuilt but not visible as raw
html in the PI)
You could create the xmlText of field 1
You could create the csvText of field 1
You could create the englishText of field 1
You could create the latinText of field 1

The last four cases would be visible in the PI and could be edited from
within the PI (unlike the htmlText), they are very real, and if you fill
them with the complete works of William Shakespear, they'll take up a lot of
space.

With enlishText/latinText, you could, depending on user interaction, display
the text as is:

set the text of field 1 to the latinText of field 1

Or, in the case of xmlText/csvText, parse the text before displaying it,
much like the Engine currently does for htmlText

put the csvText of field 1 into tempStore
replace comma with tab in tempStore
set the text of field 1 to tempStore

Again, when your Ah Ha moment comes you'll know exactly what custom
properties are, how to work with them, how to see their contents,
everything, because you have already been working with the magic of
properties and the PI for a very long time. The only magic you don't
understand right now is what you are doing right now that could be done with
custom properties.

My analogy for custom properties is they are like properties that you don't
know exist. Take the defaultMenubar for instance. You could spend years
makeing the exact same menubar for all your MainStacks and subStacks. It
works for you, they are real, you know how to amend them - it's a lot of
work in you need to add a menu item to the menuBar of 7 substacks.

When someone tells you that there's a property 'the defaultMenubar' which
allows you to build one menuBar and have it appear for any substack you know
you can use that to your advantage, you know how to use it because you've
used other properties. You'll also wish someone told you about it  years ago
;-)

HTH

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Mark Wieder
Kay-

Friday, May 1, 2009, 6:25:38 PM, you wrote:

 My analogy for custom properties is they are like properties that you don't
 know exist.

Exactly.

-- 
-Mark Wieder
 mwie...@ahsoftware.net

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-05-01 Thread Scott Morrow


On May 1, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Scott Rossi wrote:

You can think of custom properties as global variables that are tied  
to

objects, instead of variables that float around in space.


That's exactly how I think of them.  Just containers.  Except  
variables  float around in space (local space or global space rather  
than outer space), where custom properties you have to say where the  
container lives (button 3 of card 1 or stack MainWindow rather than  
in the shed)


Scott Morrow
Elementary Software

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-04-30 Thread Judy Perry
DunbarX recently lamented the lack of stupid new user questions.  As I 
privately communicated to hi  Jacque, while not a new user, I certainly 
have stupid questions in abundance.


So here's mine on custom properties  arrays:

I d/l Mark's stack on the subject.  Here are my comments (no criticism of 
Mark intended):


1.  That's rather alot of work to go through for a stack that would have, 
at best, 3 or 4 cards worth of data.


2.  I'm willing to concede that, for such an employee database on the 
order of where I work, with probably ~7,000 employees, Mark's solution 
likely makes better sense from both a programming standpoint as well as a 
speed of execution standpoint.


3.  I am, however, willing to also point out that, for some 
normal human newcomer, if they're told they should NEVER EVER save data 
in a stack having multiple cards and multiple fields, they're gonna tell 
you that's why they stick with PowerPoint.


4.  I think #4 above defeats the purpose.  We were all stupid normal 
humans at one point.  Some of us (moi) still are.  There has to be some 
threshold at which Mark's approach makes sense and underneath that it 
simply doesn't matter.  What is that threshold and why does it matter at 
that point?


Kindest thanks,

Judy
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-04-30 Thread DunbarX
Good to know I am not alone.

I made a stack with 11,000 cards. Navigating via script or msg is fast (go
cd 7500). Navigating with Cmd-3 (or its menu equal) is horrible. I wonder
why. Finding is not bad, not nearly as fast as HC, but not bad. Saving takes
a few seconds. Sorting takes a little time. I have not experimented with
other common commands to see what else slows down, or whether it is possible
to design around them.

I think the one thing, for me, that is disappointing in Rev is this
practical limit on the number of cards. A la HC, it is comforting to me to be 
able
to hold the data within the app. That means lots of cards.

Craig Newman


In a message dated 4/30/09 2:25:36 PM, jper...@ecs.fullerton.edu writes:


 4.  I think #4 above defeats the purpose.  We were all stupid normal
 humans at one point.  Some of us (moi) still are.  There has to be some
 threshold at which Mark's approach makes sense and underneath that it
 simply doesn't matter.  What is that threshold and why does it matter at
 that point?





**
Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the
web. Get the Radio Toolbar!
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown0003)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-04-30 Thread DunbarX
I am comparing simple operations on identical 11,000 card stacks in both HC 
and rev. I am using a 450 Mhz G4 for HC, OS 9.1, and a 2GHz G5 for rev, OS 
10,4.

Not so different, really, and I am giving HC a 6X handicap for the 
hardware. Just a guess.

HC runs about 2.5 times faster with simple operations, like putting a 
random number in a field on each card. HC sorts about 8X faster. HC finds MUCH 
faster, no surprise, especially when noticing if there is nothing to find.

So maybe not so bad, at least with 11,000 cards.

Craig Newman


**
Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from 
anywhere on the web. Get the Radio Toolbar! 
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown0003)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-04-30 Thread Scott Morrow

Hello Judy,

snipThere has to be some threshold at which Mark's approach  
makes sense and underneath that it simply doesn't matter.  What is  
that threshold and why does it matter at that point? /snip


I agree. However,  trying to define that threshold isn't probably ever  
going to be satisfying. I think this is one of those instructional  
difficulties that is hard to nail down outside of generalities and  
theory.   Using custom props to store data is usually not one of the  
concepts I would expect most folks new to Revolution to pick up early  
on.  Learning to store data in fields on cards is probably a simpler,  
more concrete and logical-next-step method that allows seemingly good  
results with the least effort.  (When I teach my 8 and 9 year old  
students to use the random function to pick a line of text,  I have  
them count the lines and hard code a digit rather than having them use  
 the number of lines of field blah   I've tried both and the digit  
is more understandable and works best for their needs.) In my case...  
even though I understood all the mechanics necessary to store data in  
custom props rather than card-based storage in fields, and I'd heard  
Richard Gaskin talk about it at two RevCons,  it wasn't until the card- 
based solution began failing my needs that I began to REALLY  
understand and start to change my way of looking at that part of  
design.  (Oh... that's what he meant...light bulb flickers )  I  
believe Judy is right about some people needing to use card-based  
storage. (especially those from a HyperCard background)  The point at  
which many of us are ready to learn another way is dependent on prior  
knowledge.  Why do I need another way? Until my prior knowledge  
included experience with and understanding of particular difficulties  
(the NEED to separate data from layout) I wasn't REALLY ready to learn  
about it other than in an abstraction or as an exercise.  (No, I'm not  
referring to Mr. Gaskin as an abstraction.)


Scott Morrow
Elementary Software

On Apr 30, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Judy Perry wrote:

DunbarX recently lamented the lack of stupid new user questions.  As  
I privately communicated to hi  Jacque, while not a new user, I  
certainly have stupid questions in abundance.


So here's mine on custom properties  arrays:

I d/l Mark's stack on the subject.  Here are my comments (no  
criticism of Mark intended):


1.  That's rather alot of work to go through for a stack that would  
have, at best, 3 or 4 cards worth of data.


2.  I'm willing to concede that, for such an employee database on  
the order of where I work, with probably ~7,000 employees, Mark's  
solution likely makes better sense from both a programming  
standpoint as well as a speed of execution standpoint.


3.  I am, however, willing to also point out that, for some normal  
human newcomer, if they're told they should NEVER EVER save data in  
a stack having multiple cards and multiple fields, they're gonna  
tell you that's why they stick with PowerPoint.


4.  I think #4 above defeats the purpose.  We were all stupid normal  
humans at one point.  Some of us (moi) still are.  There has to be  
some threshold at which Mark's approach makes sense and underneath  
that it simply doesn't matter.  What is that threshold and why does  
it matter at that point?


Kindest thanks,

Judy
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-04-30 Thread Bob Sneidar
I suppose I am tromping on old ground, but here goes. I remember being  
in Hypercard and running into the slowness that started creeping in  
with anything over 2000 cards. Back then the moniker was a card  
equaled a record in a database. People who then tried to use  
Hypercard as a Database were severely disappointed to learn of this  
limitation (not to mention miffed at the stack corruption that  
eventually ensued).


At the time there were a couple or three attempts to connect Hypercard  
to some other kind of database like dBase. They had mixed reviews.  
They never really worked out a stable and easy to use interface. The  
upshot was that Hypercard was not a good development environment for  
Database Applications of any great size.


Fast forward to the present: Some genius figures out how to connect a  
Hypercard like datafile to a SQL database! Genius! A little clunky at  
first, but it's been getting better all the time. They call it  
Runtime Revolution. Catchy name. But now the moniker is A card  
equals a form into which you can populate the fields with data from  
your SQL (or whatever) database.


Clearly the strengths of Hypercard are now weaknesses in Revolution,  
and the weaknesses of Hypercard are now passed over in Revolution. All  
that to say this: Any attempt to take an old Hypercard stack which was  
a database and convert it to Revolution is going to be fraught with  
difficulty. It's the wrong decade. It's the wrong century for crying  
out loud! It's the wrong way to think about the problem.


If I were you I would export the data from Hypercard (assuming you  
have an old clunker that can run Hypercard), export all your  
scripting, copy one card from each unique backround into an empty  
stack, import that into Revolution and begin the process of converting  
your data into some usable form with SQL as a back end. Better yet, if  
the scripting is not all that extensive, just start from scratch.


Revolution may be like Hypercard sort of, but really it's not. It's  
like a different animal species that vaguely shares some of the same  
external features of another species, but they are not even in the  
same family. Like Hyenas and Dogs. They are actually a kind of cat.  
Who knew?


I know there is a lot more history between then and now, but this is  
not a history, it's my explanation on why we cannot expect to convert  
hypercard stacks to revolution stacks and have them just work all  
the time, and why maybe that isn't really what we wanted anyway if we  
thought about it for a bit.


Bob Sneidar
IT Manager
Logos Management
Calvary Chapel CM

On Apr 30, 2009, at 3:38 PM, dunb...@aol.com wrote:


Good to know I am not alone.

I made a stack with 11,000 cards. Navigating via script or msg is  
fast (go
cd 7500). Navigating with Cmd-3 (or its menu equal) is horrible. I  
wonder
why. Finding is not bad, not nearly as fast as HC, but not bad.  
Saving takes
a few seconds. Sorting takes a little time. I have not experimented  
with
other common commands to see what else slows down, or whether it is  
possible

to design around them.

I think the one thing, for me, that is disappointing in Rev is this
practical limit on the number of cards. A la HC, it is comforting to  
me to be able

to hold the data within the app. That means lots of cards.

Craig Newman


In a message dated 4/30/09 2:25:36 PM, jper...@ecs.fullerton.edu  
writes:




4.  I think #4 above defeats the purpose.  We were all stupid normal
humans at one point.  Some of us (moi) still are.  There has to be  
some

threshold at which Mark's approach makes sense and underneath that it
simply doesn't matter.  What is that threshold and why does it  
matter at

that point?






**
Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the
web. Get the Radio Toolbar!
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown0003 
)

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-04-30 Thread Judy Perry

Hi Scott,

Thanks for the reply!

snip
I think this is one of those instructional difficulties 
that is hard to nail down outside of generalities and theory.   Using custom 
props to store data is usually not one of the concepts I would expect most 
folks new to Revolution to pick up early on.  Learning to store data in 
fields on cards is probably a simpler, more concrete and logical-next-step 
method that allows seemingly good results with the least effort.


Right, and I'm probably right in there at the 9 year old level ;-)

I'm trying to figure out what new (to me) things are worth spending time 
on this summer (worth = useful for me) and which are not.  I honestly do 
not see myself doing 32,000 card stacks anytime soon as my little things 
are just educational aids for my kids, so I thought I'd pick custom 
properties since everyone seems to be of the opinion that they are the 
bee's knees. Howevder, I need to see an example along the lines of the 
sorts of things I'd be likely to use them for as well as an extremely 
detailed set of instructions with explanations of why as well as how.


Thank you again for your reply,

Judy
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-04-30 Thread J. Landman Gay

Judy Perry wrote:

I'm trying to figure out what new (to me) things are worth spending time 
on this summer (worth = useful for me) and which are not.  I honestly do 
not see myself doing 32,000 card stacks anytime soon as my little things 
are just educational aids for my kids, so I thought I'd pick custom 
properties since everyone seems to be of the opinion that they are the 
bee's knees. Howevder, I need to see an example along the lines of the 
sorts of things I'd be likely to use them for as well as an extremely 
detailed set of instructions with explanations of why as well as how.


They're the bee's knees when they're the best way to do something. ;)

So, suppose you wanted to make a little quiz stack for your kids. Maybe 
something to help with their homework. You have multiple choice buttons 
on each card. Each card has a question or a puzzle or something on it, 
and they choose the right answer by clicking the correct button.


There's a different correct answer per card. Where do you store the answer?

There are lots of ways to do it. A hidden field could store the answer, 
but then you've got an extra object to work around. Sometimes that 
doesn't matter, sometimes it does. Or you could label each button with a 
special name when it's the right answer -- but that would mean you 
couldn't share the buttons in a background, you'd need a complete new 
set on each card, because they'd need different labels on each card. 
That's a lot of extra buttons for nothing. You could have a list of 
right answers in a text file and read those in, but that's way overkill, 
and then you have a separate file to keep track of and a bunch of 
scripting to do.


The bee's knees in this case is to store the right answer as a custom 
property of each card. That would behave the same way as a hidden field 
but without the extra object overhead. Custom properties are just 
convenient hidden storage, and they are immediately accessible by any 
script without any extra scripting.


It would be great if you could talk about some of the things you want to 
make. Then we could opine on whether custom properties are suitable for 
those projects. Bear in mind there is usually no right way to do 
something, though there may be a more efficient way. We have some great 
opiners here. :)


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Dumb Newbie Questions -- 1 of N

2009-04-30 Thread Richard Gaskin

Scott Morrow wrote:

 Why do I need another way? Until my prior knowledge included
 experience with and understanding of particular difficulties
 (the NEED to separate data from layout) I wasn't REALLY ready
 to learn about it other than in an abstraction or as an exercise.

I think you've hit on a key point there.

For a lot of projects, there's no harm in storing data in fields. 
There, I said it.  Some may call it blasphemy, but I think it's true 
just the same.


If what you need can fit in a stack gracefully in Rev, go for it.

And if you need something more you have many options, from custom 
properties in stack files to text files to several different RDBMS engines.


While there are some limitations with Rev, there's also much freedom.

There are all sorts of so-called best practices, and while they might 
be important for professional work they needn't encumber someone who 
just needs to whip up some gadget for their own use.


Use whatever feels natural, and if you hit a wall there are many options 
for getting over it.



 (No, I'm not referring to Mr. Gaskin as an abstraction.)

I've been called worse. :)

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World
 Revolution training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
 Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Newbie Questions

2007-11-04 Thread Jonathan Scott

Hi,
	My name is Jonathan Scott.  I was using SuperCard for quite a  
while.  Hypercard before that.  I recently moved over to RunRev.  I'm  
sorry to bug you with simple stuff, but I don't seem to be able to  
find the answers on my own.
	I have a stack that is supposed to write out text files.  When I use  
the normal file writing procedure (as shown below):


open file thisfile for write
write thisstuff to file thisfile
close file thisfile

	I can get the files to show up, but they don't appear immediately.   
Even if I reboot the computer, the files won't show up.  The only way  
to get them to show up is to do a search of my hard drive for the  
file name and then, the computer will tell me about them.
	So, I switched to the put thisstuff into URL file:thisfile  
method.  And that works a whole lot better.


	Here's the problem though: I can't get either of these methods to  
work in a standalone.  When I save the stacks out as a standalone, no  
files ever get written, no matter what I do.


--

Next problem:

	send mouseUp to bg btn Bob doesn't work for me at all when I put  
it in the openstack handler.
	I researched it out on the net, and they said that this was a  
problem with the preferences file getting corrupted.  The suggested  
advice was to throw away the preferences file.  I did this, but, it  
still didn't work.  It goes without saying that it was also  
unsuccessful in a standalone.


Thanks.  I'm sorry to bother you with trivial matters.

P.S. I'm on a mac running Tiger.  Thank you again.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions

2007-11-04 Thread Mark Schonewille

Hi Jonathan,

Nice to see you here. Welcome to the Rev community.

I am pretty sure that something is wrong with the path. Note that Rev  
paths don't use colons but slashes to delimit the components of the  
path.


Do you see similar problems if you run the following script?

on foo
  ask file Save as...
  if it is not empty then
put it into myFile
open file myFile for write
write some string to file myFile
close file myFile
put You can find your file at:  myFile
  end if
end foo

Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

--

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz

Quickly extract data from your HyperCard stacks with DIFfersifier.  
http://differsifier.economy-x-talk.com



Op 4-nov-2007, om 22:58 heeft Jonathan Scott het volgende geschreven:


Hi,
	My name is Jonathan Scott.  I was using SuperCard for quite a  
while.  Hypercard before that.  I recently moved over to RunRev.   
I'm sorry to bug you with simple stuff, but I don't seem to be able  
to find the answers on my own.
	I have a stack that is supposed to write out text files.  When I  
use the normal file writing procedure (as shown below):


open file thisfile for write
write thisstuff to file thisfile
close file thisfile

	I can get the files to show up, but they don't appear  
immediately.  Even if I reboot the computer, the files won't show  
up.  The only way to get them to show up is to do a search of my  
hard drive for the file name and then, the computer will tell me  
about them.
	So, I switched to the put thisstuff into URL file:thisfile  
method.  And that works a whole lot better.


	Here's the problem though: I can't get either of these methods to  
work in a standalone.  When I save the stacks out as a standalone,  
no files ever get written, no matter what I do.


--

Next problem:

	send mouseUp to bg btn Bob doesn't work for me at all when I  
put it in the openstack handler.
	I researched it out on the net, and they said that this was a  
problem with the preferences file getting corrupted.  The suggested  
advice was to throw away the preferences file.  I did this, but, it  
still didn't work.  It goes without saying that it was also  
unsuccessful in a standalone.


Thanks.  I'm sorry to bother you with trivial matters.

P.S. I'm on a mac running Tiger.  Thank you again.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions

2007-11-04 Thread Sarah Reichelt
Welcome to the Revolution, Jonathan :-) And please don;t apologize for
asking questions. I think a lot of people are too nervous to ask, so
it is great when someone like you actually does. The information will
be of use to a lot more than just you.

 My name is Jonathan Scott.  I was using SuperCard for quite a
 while.  Hypercard before that.  I recently moved over to RunRev.  I'm
 sorry to bug you with simple stuff, but I don't seem to be able to
 find the answers on my own.
 I have a stack that is supposed to write out text files.  When I use
 the normal file writing procedure (as shown below):

 open file thisfile for write
 write thisstuff to file thisfile
 close file thisfile

 I can get the files to show up, but they don't appear immediately.
 Even if I reboot the computer, the files won't show up.  The only way
 to get them to show up is to do a search of my hard drive for the
 file name and then, the computer will tell me about them.

I have had this happen sometimes when writing files to the Desktop.
Unfortunately, I think it is Tiger's fault, not something that Rev can
fix. Leopard is supposed to be much better at keeping the Finder
display current.

 So, I switched to the put thisstuff into URL file:thisfile
 method.  And that works a whole lot better.

Yes, and it's much easier to write. I never use the other method any more.

 Here's the problem though: I can't get either of these methods to
 work in a standalone.  When I save the stacks out as a standalone, no
 files ever get written, no matter what I do.

This is odd. If you were not using local files, I would think that the
URL library was getting left out of your standalone, but I don't think
that matters for just writing to your own drives. Put a check after
the line that saves the data and see what the result is set to. If
there is a problem, the result should tell you what it is.

 Next problem:

 send mouseUp to bg btn Bob doesn't work for me at all when I put
 it in the openstack handler.
 I researched it out on the net, and they said that this was a
 problem with the preferences file getting corrupted.  The suggested
 advice was to throw away the preferences file.  I did this, but, it
 still didn't work.  It goes without saying that it was also
 unsuccessful in a standalone.

Unless you have opened a HyperCard stack in Rev, you don't need to
specify bg or cd for any object. If you opened an HC stack
directly, then the global property HCaddressing will be set to true
and then you do specify cd or bg, but usually, you won't.

So maybe the problem is that the button is not being found. Do you get
an error or does nothing happen at all? Try adding another command
like a beep to the openStack handler to make sure it is actually being
called.

HTH,
Sarah
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions

2007-11-04 Thread Jim Ault
On 11/4/07 2:58 PM, Jonathan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a stack that is supposed to write out text files.  When I use
 the normal file writing procedure (as shown below):
 
 open file thisfile for write
 write thisstuff to file thisfile
 close file thisfile
 

--hint: it might be better to add the extension, eg.  .txt
--URL  file:  only works for  'text' files, not images
or other binary code files.
--the path you specify must exist
--the defaultfolder always has a setting to something

- copy code below this line-

answer a file will be written to :  cr  the defaultFolder
answer folder Choose a folder... any folder
put it into fullPathName
answer fullPathName

answer file Choose a file ... any file 
put it into fullFileName
answer fullFileName

put fullPathName  cr  fullFileName into msg

set the defaultFolder to fullPathName
put the seconds   seconds   cr  msg into url (file:thisfile.txt)
answer my new file exists =  (there is a file thisfile.txt)

set the defaultFolder to specialFolderPath(Desktop)
put the ticks   ticks  cr  msg into url (file:thisfile.txt)
answer my new file exists =  (there is a file thisfile.txt)



- end copy code above this line 

Copy the above lines (without the --- lines),
go to Rev, activate the message box
click on the second tab (multi-line messages)
paste in the code lines, then hit the enterkey to execute

Follow the bouncing dialog boxes.

This should get you pretty far down the path :-)

Jim Ault
Las Vegas


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions

2007-11-04 Thread J. Landman Gay

Jim Ault wrote:


--URL  file:  only works for  'text' files, not images
or other binary code files.


I misread this for a moment before I understood what Jim meant. In case 
anyone else did the same thing, the above means that the URL file 
specification only works on text files. It doesn't mean you can't write 
binary files using the URL keyword. To write binary data to a file using 
the URL keyword, substitute binfile for file.


Examples:

 put myTextData into url (file: myPath) -- text files only
 put myBinaryData into url (binfile:  myPath) -- binary files

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: newbie questions/

2006-02-19 Thread Klaus Major

Hello Benjamin,


hi!


please let me welcome you to the list first :-)

I downloaded Revolution to test some
things I want to accomplish for a game.

I am having trouble trying to find how to
apply a command to make a picture (or quicktime movie) Draggable.

Example of what I want to accomplish:

I have a 3d Barrel picture:
I want to be able to:

-Move the barrel freely on the screen (or maybe to an specific part)
-How do I play a sound while I am dragging the barrel?
then stop (or pause) the sound when I stop dragging?



Hint: This is only ONE possible solution! ;-)

1. Create a player object to play your dragging sound.
I will call it dragsound in my example

2. Put this into the script of you image (to be dragged):

###
on mousedown
   set the looping of player dragsound to true
  ## this is optional, just in case you only have a short sound
  ## and want to play it in a loop

  set the currenttime of player dragsound to 0
  ## rewind the sound, in case it has been started before

  start player dragsound
  ## finally play that sound

  grab me
  ## this will make the image draggable finally :-)
end mousedown

on mouseup
   stop player dragsound
end mouseup
##

That was it :-)


I want to apply the same commands to a quicktime
movie and be able to go to an specific animation
track section (ej. Dragging makes sound, double clicking


Just add a on mousedoubleup handler to your object.


plays an open barrel top animation.


You can do the same as above with a quicktime movie, but
that may cause lots of flickering on the screen unless you set
the alwaysbuffer of that movei/player to true.

BUT in that case the playback of the movie may be a bit jerky.
Sorry to say, but that may be very unsatisfying...


At the same time I want to send a Message to another
object. Ej. On double clicking the barrel send barrelOpened
msg and trigger another action on any object, sound etc.


That is almost the correct syntax :-)

Create a custom handler on barrelOpened in the script of your
target object:

e.G. Button xyz

on barrelOpened
 ## do this and do that
 ## and whatever you want
end barrelOpened

And then you can simply send this message from any other object to
the object that you want to react upon the message:

on mousedoubleup
  send barrelOpened to btn xyz
  ## or whatever object has the script above
end mousedoubleup

Imortatnt hint:
QUOTES are absolutely necessary around the name of the message to be  
sent, see above!


Also, Revolution recognises alpha channel in a quicktime movie? (3d  
model)


No, unfortunately not.


Thanks!


Hope that helps.


Benjamin


Regards from germany

Klaus Major
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.major-k.de

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


newbie questions/

2006-02-18 Thread benjamin pastrana
hi!

I downloaded Revolution to test some
things I want to accomplish for a game.

I am having trouble trying to find how to
apply a command to make a picture (or quicktime movie) Draggable.

Example of what I want to accomplish:

I have a 3d Barrel picture:
I want to be able to:

-Move the barrel freely on the screen (or maybe to an specific part)
-How do I play a sound while I am dragging the barrel?
then stop (or pause) the sound when I stop dragging?

I want to apply the same commands to a quicktime
movie and be able to go to an specific animation
track section (ej. Dragging makes sound, double clicking
plays an open barrel top animation.

At the same time I want to send a Message to another
object. Ej. On double clicking the barrel send barrelOpened
msg and trigger another action on any object, sound etc.

Also, Revolution recognises alpha channel in a quicktime movie? (3d model)
Thanks!

Benjamin
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Newbie questions

2005-09-24 Thread AbilityForms
Hi Everyone,

Here are probably some dumb questions.

1. Why is there a fatter border around one of the fields in my previous HC 
stack? How do I eliminate the extra width?

2. What does focus border and focusable mean?

Joe, Orlando Florida

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie questions

2005-09-24 Thread Mark Smith
1. That's probably just a normal default translation from HC to rev  
thing. You can change it in the property inspector for the field in  
question, or by script from the message box : set the borderWidth of  
fld myField to (number of pixels).


2. Focus, in this case indicates a selection ie. if you have clicked  
on a field, or are typing into it, it will be the object 'in focus'.  
The focus border is an extra border drawn around the field when it is  
in focus, and you can make a field unfocusable or focusable (again,  
look in the property inspector). Typically, a label field would be  
unfocusable. Slightly confusingly, the actual property is  
'traversalOn', so you might 'set the traversalOn of fld myField to  
true or false' when you want to change this property.


Since I guess you're coming from HC, i'd just say, as someone who  
also made that transition, that while some things in Rev can be  
confusing and frustrating for the experienced HC'er, the extra power,  
speed and sheer breadth of Rev easily make it worth losing a little  
hair for.


Good luck!

Mark

On 24 Sep 2005, at 16:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Everyone,

Here are probably some dumb questions.

1. Why is there a fatter border around one of the fields in my  
previous HC

stack? How do I eliminate the extra width?

2. What does focus border and focusable mean?

Joe, Orlando Florida

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Newbie questions

2005-08-17 Thread AbilityForms
Hi Everyone

I'm in the middle of converting several HyperCard stacks into DreamCard. 

Question 1:
Since I often go from stack to stack gathering and distributing data I need 
to close and save each stack when I'm finished with it. HyperCard does this 
automatically as we know. How is this done in Revolution?

Question 2:
How do I delete a group of objects without losing the fields and buttons in 
the group?

Joe
Orlando Florida
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie questions

2005-08-17 Thread Ken Ray
On 8/17/05 2:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Everyone
 
 I'm in the middle of converting several HyperCard stacks into DreamCard.
 
 Question 1:
 Since I often go from stack to stack gathering and distributing data I need
 to close and save each stack when I'm finished with it. HyperCard does this
 automatically as we know. How is this done in Revolution?

You choose Save from the File menu before you go to the next stack.
 
 Question 2:
 How do I delete a group of objects without losing the fields and buttons in
 the group?

You 'ungroup' the group by selecting the group object and choosing Ungroup
Selected from the Object menu (or click the emboldened Group button on
the toolbar).


Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie questions

2005-08-17 Thread Timothy Miller

Hi Everyone

I'm in the middle of converting several HyperCard stacks into DreamCard.

Question 1:
Since I often go from stack to stack gathering and distributing data I need
to close and save each stack when I'm finished with it. HyperCard does this
automatically as we know. How is this done in Revolution?


Hi Joe,


Aside from Ken's worthy comment, another way to go, depending on how 
you use your stacks --


Sometimes it makes a sense to add to a script the line/s --

save stack whatever

--with or without--

close stack whatever


If it's a suitable script, you probably won't lose data simply 
because you forgot to save, or failed to save before a spontaneous 
quit due to an application migraine. A script like this saves when 
you need to, like only when you make a data change in a stack, 
without saving too often or too seldom, like with an auto-save stack.


HTH


Tim
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


More Newbie questions

2005-02-20 Thread Len Morgan
I seem to have screwed my self into a problem.
I was trying to create a function that was part of the OpenStack call 
that made a connection to a database, run a SELECT *... call, then 
position to the first record ready to go.  Well, I made a typo on one of 
the lines but now I can't change anything because this executes when I 
open the stack and never closes because of the error.  I can get to the 
script and I can TYPE the changes but RR refuses to save the changes 
because the script is still running.  Do I have to throw out 
everything else I've done and start over to get rid of this error?  I 
hope not because I was following what I've been told is the right way 
to write RR stacks, namely, do the GUI first and then write the scripts 
for the controls.

Any advise would be appreciated (like how do I stop the OpenStack from 
running in the first place? 

Thanks
Len Morgan
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: More Newbie questions

2005-02-20 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Len Morgan wrote:

 Any advise would be appreciated (like how do I stop the OpenStack from
 running in the first place?

You can try executing the following in your message box.  When prompted for
the file, choose your stack.

  answer file Locate stack:;set lockMessages to true;open stack it

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Development  Design
-
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.tactilemedia.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: More Newbie questions

2005-02-20 Thread Rob Cozens
Hi Len,
Any advise would be appreciated (like how do I stop the OpenStack from 
running in the first place?
Two options:
1.  Choose suppress messages from the IDE menus before opening the stack
2.  Don't open the stack;but go to the message box and type edit the 
script of stack [whatever]

Rob Cozens CCW
Serendipity Software Company
And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three;
 Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee.
 from The Triple Foole by John Donne (1572-1631) 

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Newbie Questions

2004-01-10 Thread Jim Carwardine
Short List of Questions...

1. Is there a search function that searches all the repositories of Rev.
knowledge... especially the list archives over all years? And, BTW, what are
all the repositories of knowledge?

2. If I have a button that is grouped so that it behaves like a bg btn in HC
can I have a different icon for each card in that button?  I know in HC I
can¹t because the button icon is shared in the background, but how about
Rev?  Would I have to keep it a card button and copy/paste it explicitly
when i create a new card under script control?

3. If I give a button a custom icon (like a thumbnail jpg), I notice that
Rev gives it an icon number.  Is that number unique to the button?  I think
yes...

4. How do I reference a button in a group?... and, related to this, If I
want to add a button to a scrolling group (the button position may be
scrolled out of sight when I add it), how do I do it and get the position of
the new button in the group spaced right?

5. I¹m creating a set of custom nav buttons that allow the user to jump to a
specific card of their choice.  These buttons have the icon of the card
button mentioned in question 2, so I¹m transferring the thumbnail icon to
the nav button, which of course will be seen on every card, by transferring
the pictPath of the card button.  If the user chooses to place a new picture
on the original card button, will the thumbnail icon of the nav button
change as well?

6. What¹s a plugin and how do I use it?  The Rev docs doesn¹t give an answer
as far as I can tell.

Sorry for the long list.  I¹m sure some of these are answered in the
knowledge base, I just can¹t find them... hence my first question.
Thanks... Jim
-- 

OYF is... Highly resourceful people working together.
http://www.OwnYourFuture-net.com

Own Your Future Consulting Services Limited,
1959 Upper Water Street, Suite 407, Halifax, Nova Scotia. B3J 3N2
Info Line: 902-823-2477, Phone: 902-823-2339. Fax: 902-823-2139




___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions

2004-01-10 Thread Thomas J McGrath III
On Jan 10, 2004, at 11:29 AM, Jim Carwardine wrote:

Short List of Questions...

2. If I have a button that is grouped so that it behaves like a bg btn 
in HC
can I have a different icon for each card in that button?  I know in 
HC I
cant because the button icon is shared in the background, but how 
about
Rev?  Would I have to keep it a card button and copy/paste it 
explicitly
when i create a new card under script control?
when a new scripted card is created use the place group menu item. I 
learned that here on the list.

tom

Macintosh PowerBook G-4 OSX 10.3.1, OS 9.2.2, 1.25 GHz, 512MB RAM, Rev 
2.1.2

Advanced Media Group
Thomas J McGrath III 2003   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
220 Drake Road, Bethel Park, PA 15102


___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions

2004-01-10 Thread James . Cass
 1. Is there a search function that searches all the 
 repositories of Rev. knowledge... especially the 
 list archives over all years? 

Yes!  The archived list has been Google-fied:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:lists.runrev.com

 And, BTW, what are all the repositories of knowledge?
That would be God.  ;-P

- James





Jim Carwardine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/10/04 11:29 AM
Please respond to How to use Revolution
 
To: Revolution Listserve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Newbie Questions


Short List of Questions...

1. Is there a search function that searches all the repositories of Rev.
knowledge... especially the list archives over all years? And, BTW, what 
are
all the repositories of knowledge?

2. If I have a button that is grouped so that it behaves like a bg btn in 
HC
can I have a different icon for each card in that button?  I know in HC I
can¹t because the button icon is shared in the background, but how about
Rev?  Would I have to keep it a card button and copy/paste it explicitly
when i create a new card under script control?

3. If I give a button a custom icon (like a thumbnail jpg), I notice that
Rev gives it an icon number.  Is that number unique to the button?  I 
think
yes...

4. How do I reference a button in a group?... and, related to this, If I
want to add a button to a scrolling group (the button position may be
scrolled out of sight when I add it), how do I do it and get the position 
of
the new button in the group spaced right?

5. I¹m creating a set of custom nav buttons that allow the user to jump to 
a
specific card of their choice.  These buttons have the icon of the card
button mentioned in question 2, so I¹m transferring the thumbnail icon to
the nav button, which of course will be seen on every card, by 
transferring
the pictPath of the card button.  If the user chooses to place a new 
picture
on the original card button, will the thumbnail icon of the nav button
change as well?

6. What¹s a plugin and how do I use it?  The Rev docs doesn¹t give an 
answer
as far as I can tell.

Sorry for the long list.  I¹m sure some of these are answered in the
knowledge base, I just can¹t find them... hence my first question.
Thanks... Jim
--

OYF is... Highly resourceful people working together.
http://www.OwnYourFuture-net.com

Own Your Future Consulting Services Limited,
1959 Upper Water Street, Suite 407, Halifax, Nova Scotia. B3J 3N2
Info Line: 902-823-2477, Phone: 902-823-2339. Fax: 902-823-2139




___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions

2004-01-10 Thread Jim Lyons
On Jan 10, 2004, at 11:29 AM, Jim Carwardine wrote:

Short List of Questions...

1. Is there a search function that searches all the repositories of 
Rev.
knowledge... especially the list archives over all years? And, BTW, 
what are
all the repositories of knowledge?
I don't know ALL the repositories, but the main one you need to learn 
the answers to most of your other questions is the Rev docs. Use the 
Search feature a lot and ALWAYS look at the See Also menu of the items 
you turn up.

2. If I have a button that is grouped so that it behaves like a bg btn 
in HC
can I have a different icon for each card in that button?  I know in 
HC I
can¹t because the button icon is shared in the background, but how 
about
Rev?  Would I have to keep it a card button and copy/paste it 
explicitly
when i create a new card under script control?
That would be one way. If you want it to be in a background group and 
have a different icon on each card, you would have to switch the icon 
of the button when the card opens. See Roadmap - Welcome - HyperCard 
Developer, About Groups and Backgrounds

3. If I give a button a custom icon (like a thumbnail jpg), I notice 
that
Rev gives it an icon number.  Is that number unique to the button?  I 
think
yes...
Yes. See Roadmap - Transcript Dictionary - ID property

4. How do I reference a button in a group?... and, related to this, If 
I
want to add a button to a scrolling group (the button position may be
scrolled out of sight when I add it), how do I do it and get the 
position of
the new button in the group spaced right?
See the doc ref to question 2 above and also Roadmap - All Doc by 
Category, Objects and Messages - About object types and object 
references

5. I¹m creating a set of custom nav buttons that allow the user to 
jump to a
specific card of their choice.  These buttons have the icon of the card
button mentioned in question 2, so I¹m transferring the thumbnail icon 
to
the nav button, which of course will be seen on every card, by 
transferring
the pictPath of the card button.  If the user chooses to place a new 
picture
on the original card button, will the thumbnail icon of the nav button
change as well?
When you ask a question like this, you'll have to give more information 
to get any useful help. Set up simple tests in a separate stack to try 
experiments. I always do this to try new things so that what I'm 
investigating doesn't get clouded by other stuff. Always do this to 
isolate some behavior you think isn't right.

6. What¹s a plugin and how do I use it?  The Rev docs doesn¹t give an 
answer
as far as I can tell.
Try entering plugin to the Roadmap - Search Rev Docs. There are 
eleven hits including the definition, How to install, and a tip on 
adding your own.

Sorry for the long list...
We'll let it go this time. ;^) Seriously, it's a good idea to put 
unrelated questions into their own messages, giving each a descriptive 
subject line. It will help us all find things easier in the archives, 
and follow the threads of replies. Welcome to the group!

Jim Lyons___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions from a ToolBook Developer

2003-12-23 Thread John Ballard
Hi All,

Wow, what a response! Thanks to everyone who answered my questions. You gave
me some valuable and time-saving information.

I see this is a great community of developers and I'm looking forward to
learning and being a part of it.

Sincerely,
John Ballard

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions from a ToolBook Developer

2003-12-22 Thread Thomas J McGrath III
John,

I am new to Revolution but spent years developing in SuperCard. I 
started using REV in late October and have creates a marketing CD for a 
third party that is cross platform in just two months. I can say that 
REV seems solid on both WIN and Mac as far as system differences go. 
The only gotchas that I have seen are mostly in my own lack of 
understanding for One tool and one stack to work on both systems. A 
lot of pre planning is needed to deal with the visual issues of both 
platforms.

Rev does have a few gotchas within it's own IDE that I believe are 
getting worked on as we speak and yes I have had to learn quickly how 
to get around them.

My problem areas were:
	Treating groups correctly. In my case OVER correctly. :-)
	Text formatting for both platforms. And inconsistent issues within 
REV. - This is being worked on.
	Dealing with systems that don't have Quicktime. - More of a 
understanding issue
	GUI differences on both platforms.
	New functions and syntax from what I was used to.
	Relative paths and defaultFolder. - there is a fix for in development.

I have learned quickly and feel very comfortable in a short time.

I downloaded Every stack I could find online and read every line of 
code in them. I still go back and open one or two a day and 'rip' them 
apart for understanding.

I don't know about number 2. and 3. is in the Groups. P.S. if you don't 
make the group first before you make new cards then it won't be 
included on each new card after the fact. I just right a button to 
repeat for number of cards and paste. Then before I hit the button I do 
a copy of the grouped objects. It does not seem to cause any adverse 
affects having to do this. I wish there were a way to create a 
'background' element. However if you already have a background group on 
all cards you can add to this group after the fact and the new object 
within this group will be included in all cards that have that 
background group.

HTH

Tom

On Dec 21, 2003, at 7:53 PM, John Ballard wrote:

Hi All,

I've been developing courseware with ToolBook for about 7 years, but 
I'm a
brand new user to Runtime Revolution.

I'm excited about the cross-platform possiblities. I'm ultimatly 
looking for
a second development tool and possibly something to switch to for 
full-time
development.

If anyone can help me with the following concerns, It'd be much 
appreciated.

1. Are there any examples of large-scale distributions of anything 
created
with Runtime Revolution? Specifically, I'm looking to see if there are 
any
gotcha distribution issues, say some minor conflict that would pop 
up on
Windows XP Home with a certain type of video card. The applications I 
build
get distributed to many thousands so I have to look far down the road. 
I'm
not asking this question as anything against Runtime Revolution's
stability--it's just that ToolBook is riddled with gotchas that have 
taken
me half a decade to find and workaround. Just want to know if it's a
similiar experience here.

2. Is there any way to dock all of the toolbars in the development
environment to make it more of a one-window application. Im trying the
program out in Windows, but will also try it out in OSX soon. I 
understand I
can edit the development-environment stacks, but this is a bit 
ambitious
since I just got started. :-)

3. Is there such a thing as a background or a master 
page/stack/card or
a shared card in Runtime Revolution? I'm looking for a way to put
something like a next button on this instead of having 200 copies of 
the
same next button on 200 cards.

Thanks in advance for any help provided,
John Ballard
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Macintosh PowerBook G-4 OSX 10.3.1, OS 9.2.2, 1.25 GHz, 512MB RAM, Rev 
2.1.2

Advanced Media Group
Thomas J McGrath III 2003   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
220 Drake Road, Bethel Park, PA 15102


___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions from a ToolBook Developer

2003-12-22 Thread Thomas J McGrath III
OH and the most important thing I left out is:
This is the best list I have ever been apart of !!! The people are 
helpful and suggestive and just generally good people. If you have 
problems come here and you WILL find an answer or a direction to look 
in.

Everyone here has helped me with my transition to REV. Even when it was 
quite obvious that I didn't read the docs and was being very lazy about 
it. I hope to give back to this community what was given to me.

Cheers,

Tom

On Dec 22, 2003, at 7:56 AM, Thomas J McGrath III wrote:

John,

I am new to Revolution but spent years developing in SuperCard. I 
started using REV in late October and have creates a marketing CD for 
a third party that is cross platform in just two months. I can say 
that REV seems solid on both WIN and Mac as far as system differences 
go. The only gotchas that I have seen are mostly in my own lack of 
understanding for One tool and one stack to work on both systems. A 
lot of pre planning is needed to deal with the visual issues of both 
platforms.

Rev does have a few gotchas within it's own IDE that I believe are 
getting worked on as we speak and yes I have had to learn quickly how 
to get around them.

My problem areas were:
	Treating groups correctly. In my case OVER correctly. :-)
	Text formatting for both platforms. And inconsistent issues within 
REV. - This is being worked on.
	Dealing with systems that don't have Quicktime. - More of a 
understanding issue
	GUI differences on both platforms.
	New functions and syntax from what I was used to.
	Relative paths and defaultFolder. - there is a fix for in development.

I have learned quickly and feel very comfortable in a short time.

I downloaded Every stack I could find online and read every line of 
code in them. I still go back and open one or two a day and 'rip' them 
apart for understanding.

I don't know about number 2. and 3. is in the Groups. P.S. if you 
don't make the group first before you make new cards then it won't be 
included on each new card after the fact. I just right a button to 
repeat for number of cards and paste. Then before I hit the button I 
do a copy of the grouped objects. It does not seem to cause any 
adverse affects having to do this. I wish there were a way to create a 
'background' element. However if you already have a background group 
on all cards you can add to this group after the fact and the new 
object within this group will be included in all cards that have that 
background group.

HTH

Tom

On Dec 21, 2003, at 7:53 PM, John Ballard wrote:

Hi All,

I've been developing courseware with ToolBook for about 7 years, but 
I'm a
brand new user to Runtime Revolution.

I'm excited about the cross-platform possiblities. I'm ultimatly 
looking for
a second development tool and possibly something to switch to for 
full-time
development.

If anyone can help me with the following concerns, It'd be much 
appreciated.

1. Are there any examples of large-scale distributions of anything 
created
with Runtime Revolution? Specifically, I'm looking to see if there 
are any
gotcha distribution issues, say some minor conflict that would pop 
up on
Windows XP Home with a certain type of video card. The applications I 
build
get distributed to many thousands so I have to look far down the 
road. I'm
not asking this question as anything against Runtime Revolution's
stability--it's just that ToolBook is riddled with gotchas that 
have taken
me half a decade to find and workaround. Just want to know if it's a
similiar experience here.

2. Is there any way to dock all of the toolbars in the development
environment to make it more of a one-window application. Im trying 
the
program out in Windows, but will also try it out in OSX soon. I 
understand I
can edit the development-environment stacks, but this is a bit 
ambitious
since I just got started. :-)

3. Is there such a thing as a background or a master 
page/stack/card or
a shared card in Runtime Revolution? I'm looking for a way to put
something like a next button on this instead of having 200 copies 
of the
same next button on 200 cards.

Thanks in advance for any help provided,
John Ballard
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Macintosh PowerBook G-4 OSX 10.3.1, OS 9.2.2, 1.25 GHz, 512MB RAM, Rev 
2.1.2

Advanced Media Group
Thomas J McGrath III 2003   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
220 Drake Road, Bethel Park, PA 15102


___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Macintosh PowerBook G-4 OSX 10.3.1, OS 9.2.2, 1.25 GHz, 512MB RAM, Rev 
2.1.2

Advanced Media Group
Thomas J McGrath III 2003   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
220 Drake Road, Bethel Park, PA 15102


___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Newbie Questions from a ToolBook Developer

2003-12-22 Thread Mark Brownell
On Sunday, December 21, 2003, at 08:55  PM, Ken Ray wrote:
2. Is there any way to dock all of the toolbars in the development 
environment to make it more of a one-window application. Im trying 
the program out in Windows, but will also try it out in OSX soon. I 
understand I can edit the development-environment stacks, but this is 
a bit ambitious since I just got started. :-)

You can't really dock windows in Rev; you can open and close 
palettes and move them around, but they don't lock together or snap 
to a location.
I do it all the time:

go stack tools
put the topLeft of stack noteBook into vamp
add 29 to item 2 of vamp
set the topLeft of stack tools to vamp
Revolution is so cool!

Mark

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions from a ToolBook Developer

2003-12-22 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 12/22/03 6:56 AM, Thomas J McGrath III wrote:

P.S. if you don't 
make the group first before you make new cards then it won't be included 
on each new card after the fact. I just right a button to repeat for 
number of cards and paste. Then before I hit the button I do a copy of 
the grouped objects. It does not seem to cause any adverse affects 
having to do this. I wish there were a way to create a 'background' 
element. However if you already have a background group on all cards you 
can add to this group after the fact and the new object within this 
group will be included in all cards that have that background group.
This isn't the most efficient way to do it and creates some bloat in the 
stack. When you copy/paste a group to another card, you are creating a 
duplicate copy of the group. If all you want to do is include an 
existing group on a card, then you just need to place the existing group 
onto the new card. Use the Place Group menu item in the Objects menu 
to do that.

This has the same effect as creating a group with its backgroundBehavior 
set to true and then making a new card (which will automatically include 
any groups on the originating card.)

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions from a ToolBook Developer

2003-12-22 Thread Ken Ray
 You can't really dock windows in Rev; you can open and close
 palettes and move them around, but they don't lock together or snap
 to a location.
 
 I do it all the time:
 
go stack tools
put the topLeft of stack noteBook into vamp
add 29 to item 2 of vamp
set the topLeft of stack tools to vamp
 
 Revolution is so cool!

I was thinking more about the way Adobe, Macromedia, and Microsoft dock
their tool palettes. We don't quite have that yet...


Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie Questions from a ToolBook Developer

2003-12-22 Thread Thomas J McGrath III
Jac,

I was talking about after a whole bunch of cards was already created 
and then you decide you need a background group. If Place group places 
an existing group to an already existing card then that would be what I 
want. However can that be scripted for say 30 or 40 cards?

Tom

P.S. I didn't even see that menu item until right now. WOW.

On Dec 22, 2003, at 12:22 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:

On 12/22/03 6:56 AM, Thomas J McGrath III wrote:

P.S. if you don't make the group first before you make new cards then 
it won't be included on each new card after the fact. I just right a 
button to repeat for number of cards and paste. Then before I hit the 
button I do a copy of the grouped objects. It does not seem to cause 
any adverse affects having to do this. I wish there were a way to 
create a 'background' element. However if you already have a 
background group on all cards you can add to this group after the 
fact and the new object within this group will be included in all 
cards that have that background group.
This isn't the most efficient way to do it and creates some bloat in 
the stack. When you copy/paste a group to another card, you are 
creating a duplicate copy of the group. If all you want to do is 
include an existing group on a card, then you just need to place the 
existing group onto the new card. Use the Place Group menu item in 
the Objects menu to do that.

This has the same effect as creating a group with its 
backgroundBehavior set to true and then making a new card (which will 
automatically include any groups on the originating card.)

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Macintosh PowerBook G-4 OSX 10.3.1, OS 9.2.2, 1.25 GHz, 512MB RAM, Rev 
2.1.2

Advanced Media Group
Thomas J McGrath III 2003   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
220 Drake Road, Bethel Park, PA 15102


___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Newbie Questions from a ToolBook Developer

2003-12-21 Thread John Ballard
Hi All,

I've been developing courseware with ToolBook for about 7 years, but I'm a
brand new user to Runtime Revolution.

I'm excited about the cross-platform possiblities. I'm ultimatly looking for
a second development tool and possibly something to switch to for full-time
development.

If anyone can help me with the following concerns, It'd be much appreciated.

1. Are there any examples of large-scale distributions of anything created
with Runtime Revolution? Specifically, I'm looking to see if there are any
gotcha distribution issues, say some minor conflict that would pop up on
Windows XP Home with a certain type of video card. The applications I build
get distributed to many thousands so I have to look far down the road. I'm
not asking this question as anything against Runtime Revolution's
stability--it's just that ToolBook is riddled with gotchas that have taken
me half a decade to find and workaround. Just want to know if it's a
similiar experience here.

2. Is there any way to dock all of the toolbars in the development
environment to make it more of a one-window application. Im trying the
program out in Windows, but will also try it out in OSX soon. I understand I
can edit the development-environment stacks, but this is a bit ambitious
since I just got started. :-)

3. Is there such a thing as a background or a master page/stack/card or
a shared card in Runtime Revolution? I'm looking for a way to put
something like a next button on this instead of having 200 copies of the
same next button on 200 cards.

Thanks in advance for any help provided,
John Ballard

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie questions

2003-10-30 Thread Scott Rossi
On 10/29/03 8:48 PM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am running into a very basic problem: None of my
 scripts execute. For example, I have this script in card 2
 
 on closecard
   global name, age, education, occupation, gender, handedness, marital
   put fld name into name
 
 Another benefit to the Hungarian-lite notation described in this week's
 Handy Handlers column at
 http://www.revjournal.com/comments.php?id=P57_0_1_0 is that it greatly
 reduces the potential for having variable names that are reserved words.

At the risk of contradicting Richard's advice and useful style guide on his
site, you might try prepending your object names with an underscore (ie
field _name).  I use this technique in my scripts and this prevents any
confusion with reserved words.  Some folks have complained that use of the
underscore prevents you from selecting the entire name by doubleclicking in
the script editor, but I find this to be a minor inconvenience (especially
since you don't need to change the underscore itself when editing the name,
for example).

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design
-
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.tactilemedia.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie questions

2003-10-30 Thread erik hansen

  on closecard
global name, age, education, occupation,...

try:

global gName, n12 # etc.



=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie questions

2003-10-30 Thread Richard Gaskin
Scott Rossi wrote:

 On 10/29/03 8:48 PM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I am running into a very basic problem: None of my
 scripts execute. For example, I have this script in card 2
 
 on closecard
 global name, age, education, occupation, gender, handedness, marital
 put fld name into name
 
 Another benefit to the Hungarian-lite notation described in this week's
 Handy Handlers column at
 http://www.revjournal.com/comments.php?id=P57_0_1_0 is that it greatly
 reduces the potential for having variable names that are reserved words.
 
 At the risk of contradicting Richard's advice and useful style guide on his
 site, you might try prepending your object names with an underscore (ie
 field _name).  I use this technique in my scripts and this prevents any
 confusion with reserved words.  Some folks have complained that use of the
 underscore prevents you from selecting the entire name by doubleclicking in
 the script editor, but I find this to be a minor inconvenience (especially
 since you don't need to change the underscore itself when editing the name,
 for example).

A single character is a single character.  It could be anything that helps
prevent name-space conflicts.  The g has an additional value as a
mnemonic; g means global, and it lets you use other chars for other
types (e.g., p for parameter).

If you use an underscore for globals, what do you use for other types?

-- 
 Richard Gaskin 
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FourthWorld.com
 Tel: 323-225-3717   AIM: FourthWorldInc

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie questions

2003-10-30 Thread Scott Rossi
 A single character is a single character.  It could be anything that helps
 prevent name-space conflicts.  The g has an additional value as a
 mnemonic; g means global, and it lets you use other chars for other
 types (e.g., p for parameter).

You're right of course.  See below.


 If you use an underscore for globals, what do you use for other types?

I don't.  I misread the problem in the original post as having to do with
object references, not variable references.  I was referring to the use of
underscores for object names (ie field _name vs field name).  I do, in
fact, use the same naming conventions for variables.  Apologies for the
misread.

Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design
-
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.tactilemedia.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie questions

2003-10-30 Thread Richard Gaskin
Scott Rossi wrote:

 I misread the problem in the original post as having to do with
 object references, not variable references.  I was referring to the use of
 underscores for object names (ie field _name vs field name).  I do, in
 fact, use the same naming conventions for variables.

I misread too:  I thought you were referring to vars. :)

But it does inntroduce a powerful aspect of Rev, being among the very few
xTalks that offer a name property and a label property separate from one
another:  you can use the name as a sort of mnemonic ID, since you have the
label for display.

For example, in an app I'm writing for a magazine article I have a button
named Connect that is used forboth connecting and disconnecting from a
server.  While I've named it simply Connect, I can change its label to
Disconnect while it's connected, and use tha label to determine the state
in my scripts.

I do something similar with stack names.  For example, in WebMerge the About
stack is named wmAbout, its FTP stack is named wmFTP, etc.  The stack
titles are set to something more descriptive for the user, butin my scripts
I havve simple single-word names that are unique for each project, allowing
me to work on several app at once without fear of conflicting stack names.

-- 
 Richard Gaskin 
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FourthWorld.com
 Tel: 323-225-3717   AIM: FourthWorldInc

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie questions

2003-10-29 Thread Sarah
Hi Paul,

Some-one else has already told you that name is a reserved word, so 
that it what breaks this script. An easy way to find out if you have 
used any reserved words is to Colorize your scripts. From the Script 
Editor, turn on Live Colorization in the View menu, of choose 
Colorize in the Script menu. Then any reserved words will be colored 
and you can see at a glance whether any of your variable names or 
function names are going to cause problems.

Cheers,
Sarah
On Sunday, October 19, 2003, at 07:54  am, Paul Malloy wrote:

I am a former HyperCard, SuperCard and OMO user who has just purchased
Revolution. Good to see many familiar names on this list.
I am trying to port some OMO stacks to Revolution by pasting the 
scripts
into objects in Rev. I am running into a very basic problem: None of my
scripts execute. For example, I have this script in card 2

on closecard
  global name, age, education, occupation, gender, handedness, marital
  put fld name into name
snip

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie questions

2003-10-29 Thread Richard Gaskin
On Sunday, October 19, 2003, at 07:54  am, Paul Malloy wrote:

 I am running into a very basic problem: None of my
 scripts execute. For example, I have this script in card 2

 on closecard
   global name, age, education, occupation, gender, handedness, marital
   put fld name into name

Another benefit to the Hungarian-lite notation described in this week's
Handy Handlers column at
http://www.revjournal.com/comments.php?id=P57_0_1_0 is that it greatly
reduces the potential for having variable names that are reserved words.

-- 
 Richard Gaskin 
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FourthWorld.com
 Tel: 323-225-3717   AIM: FourthWorldInc

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


OS X 'do applescript' consistently launches Classic (was newbie questions)

2003-10-20 Thread Ian Wood
I've sorted out my other problems, but this one is still happening:

In text field applescript-
tell application QuickTime Player
activate

blah blah bits of applescript code
end tell

In a button-
on mouseUp
put text of field applescript into theScript
do theScript as AppleScript
end mouseUp
If QT is open then it works fine, if QT is not open then Classic 
launches and the OS 9 version of QT opens.

This has the same effect with all Apple apps with the same name in X 
and 9, such as QT, iMovie, Disk Copy, iTunes.  If the app is not 
already open in X then the Classic environment launches.

It does NOT have the same effect for non-Apple apps such as Internet 
Explorer or Stuffit Expander.

???

Tested with Rev 1.1.1 on OS X 10.2.1  Rev 2.1 trial on 10.2.6.

Any help with this would be great, it's getting really annoying!

Ian Wood
Panoramic photography, from web to billboard, sunrise to moonrise
http://www.azurevision.co.uk
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: Several newbie questions a documentation request

2003-10-18 Thread Ken Ray

 1) I am running an AppleScript to open an image sequence in QT Pro.  
 The applescript is stored in a field, a replace is done on the 
 variables and the do theScript as AppleScript.  So far, so good.  
 Except that Classic launches as the AppleScript tries to 
 launch the OS 
 9 version of QT.  Both from Script Editor and as a compiled 
 script the 
 script correctly launches QT in OS X.  Any ideas?

Do you have an OS X version of QT Pro? If so, what's its path?

 2) The app has three option menu buttons to set video size, 
 frame rate 
 and pan direction (l/r).  Is it just something in my coding 
 (I tried to 
 convert the info in the menu manager tutorial to the button) or are 
 these always so slow to work?  On a PB 1GHz and a P4 1.5GHz 
 it can take 
 up to 15 seconds for each menu button to become active!

That's ridiculously slow... something else must be going on. Rev is
really fast at this kind of stuff. When you say become active, do you
mean that you initially have them in a disabled state and then it takes
the time to re-enable them? Can you please clarify?

 3)  The 'New Developers' documentation needs a section on the 
 differences between AppleScript and Transcript, if this has 
 not already 
 been added in 2.1!  All the time wasted until I discovered 
 that 'put 20 
 into variable' was the correct grammar, not 'set variable to 20' got 
 irritating, especially as properties DO work in the 'set to' grammar.

Agreed. 

 4) I can't see from the website, do the new video 
 capabilities of Rev 2 
 include making video from image sequences?

Sorry, can't help you there (video's not my strong suit).

 5) Is it possible to export a snapsho directly to file?  I am 
 currently 
 importing the snapshot and then exporting it to JPEG, but of course 
 this results in a huge amount of flicker and general 
 nastiness as I am 
 generating up to 1500 snapshots in a row.

Sure, the export snapshot command allows you to do this, but this was
introduced in Rev 2.1, so you'd have to upgrade to get this feature.

Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ 


___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: Several newbie questions a documentation request

2003-10-18 Thread Ken Ray
One other thing, Ian... there's a bunch of tips on using Rev at my site:

  http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/revolution.htm

that might help out in your development.

Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ 


___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Newbie questions

2003-10-18 Thread Paul Malloy
I am a former HyperCard, SuperCard and OMO user who has just purchased
Revolution. Good to see many familiar names on this list.

I am trying to port some OMO stacks to Revolution by pasting the scripts
into objects in Rev. I am running into a very basic problem: None of my
scripts execute. For example, I have this script in card 2

on closecard
  global name, age, education, occupation, gender, handedness, marital
  put fld name into name
  put fld age into age
  put fld education into education
  put fld occupation into occupation
  put button gender into gender
  put button handedness into handedness
  put button marital into marital
  put empty into fld name
  put empty into fld age
  put empty into fld education
  put empty into fld occupation
end closecard

And this script in card 3:

on opencard
  global name, age, education, gender, handedness
  put name into fld name
  put age into fld age
  put education into fld education
  put gender into fld gender
  put handedness into fld handedness
end opencard

Nothing happens when I go to card 3. I get this error message, which makes
no sense to me. Am I making a mistake is syntax?

 compiling at 5:48:17 PM
Typeglobal: not a valid variable name
ObjectDemographics
Lineglobal name, age, education, occupation, gender, handedness, marital
Hintname

Thanks in advance.

Paul Malloy


___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Newbie questions

2003-10-18 Thread Richard Gaskin
Paul Malloy wrote:

 I am a former HyperCard, SuperCard and OMO user who has just purchased
 Revolution. Good to see many familiar names on this list.
 
 I am trying to port some OMO stacks to Revolution by pasting the scripts
 into objects in Rev. I am running into a very basic problem: None of my
 scripts execute. For example, I have this script in card 2
 
 on closecard
 global name, age, education, occupation, gender, handedness, marital
 put fld name into name
 put fld age into age
 put fld education into education
 put fld occupation into occupation
 put button gender into gender
 put button handedness into handedness
 put button marital into marital
 put empty into fld name
 put empty into fld age
 put empty into fld education
 put empty into fld occupation
 end closecard
 
 And this script in card 3:
 
 on opencard
 global name, age, education, gender, handedness
 put name into fld name
 put age into fld age
 put education into fld education
 put gender into fld gender
 put handedness into fld handedness
 end opencard
 
 Nothing happens when I go to card 3. I get this error message, which makes
 no sense to me. Am I making a mistake is syntax?
 
 compiling at 5:48:17 PM
 Typeglobal: not a valid variable name
 ObjectDemographics
 Lineglobal name, age, education, occupation, gender, handedness, marital
 Hintname

name is a reserved keyword, and as such cannot be mirrored as a global var
name.

I'm surprised that worked in other xTalks.  Small price to pay for orders of
magnitude greater speed...

-- 
 Richard Gaskin 
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 Developer of WebMerge: Publish any database on any Web site
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FourthWorld.com
 Tel: 323-225-3717   AIM: FourthWorldInc

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Several newbie questions a documentation request

2003-10-17 Thread Ian Wood
Hi Folks,

I am new to the list, having received Revolution 1.1.1 on a cover Cd 
and immediately realised that I can now make my AppleScript project 
into a cross-platform app!

Revolution 1.1.1 on OS X 10.2.1, 1GB RAM.

An application that opens a QTVR cubic pano, takes start and end points 
then produces a sequence of stills that can then be put together into 
video.  The main market is for putting pans onto DVDs, but i started 
doing this for a 'timelapse' project of my own.

Anyway, I downloaded the 24K message mbox  have been looking on there, 
but have problems I cannot find on it...

1) I am running an AppleScript to open an image sequence in QT Pro.  
The applescript is stored in a field, a replace is done on the 
variables and the do theScript as AppleScript.  So far, so good.  
Except that Classic launches as the AppleScript tries to launch the OS 
9 version of QT.  Both from Script Editor and as a compiled script the 
script correctly launches QT in OS X.  Any ideas?

===
put the text of field applescript 1 into theScript
  replace filePath with defaultFolder in theScript
  replace frameRate with frame_rate in theScript
  replace / with : in theScript --to get correct filepath breaks in 
AS
  answer theScript
  do theScript as AppleScript
===

2) The app has three option menu buttons to set video size, frame rate 
and pan direction (l/r).  Is it just something in my coding (I tried to 
convert the info in the menu manager tutorial to the button) or are 
these always so slow to work?  On a PB 1GHz and a P4 1.5GHz it can take 
up to 15 seconds for each menu button to become active!

===
global gVar_dimensions
on menupick pWhich
  switch pWhich
case 768x576-PAL square
  answer Use this option only when the movie will be seen on a Tv 
screen, you will need to export the movie at 720x576
  break
  case 720x576- DV-PAL
break
case 720x534-NTSC square
  answer Use this option only when the movie will be seen on a 
Tv screen, you will need to export the movie at 720x480
  break
  case 720x480- DV-NTSC
break
case 600x400
  break
  case 480x320
break
case 320x240
  end switch
  put pWhich into gVar_dimensions

  get gVar_dimensions
  if it = 768x576-PAL square then
  set width of player 1 to 768
  set height of player 1 to 576
  set the top of player 1 to 0
  set the left of player 1 to 150
  set the hilitedButtonName of group frame rate to 25
  set the menuHistory of button frame rate to 4
(then come all the other ifs)

end menuPick
===
Would it be better to do the if statements in a separate script?

3)  The 'New Developers' documentation needs a section on the 
differences between AppleScript and Transcript, if this has not already 
been added in 2.1!  All the time wasted until I discovered that 'put 20 
into variable' was the correct grammar, not 'set variable to 20' got 
irritating, especially as properties DO work in the 'set to' grammar.

4) I can't see from the website, do the new video capabilities of Rev 2 
include making video from image sequences?

5) Is it possible to export a snapsho directly to file?  I am currently 
importing the snapshot and then exporting it to JPEG, but of course 
this results in a huge amount of flicker and general nastiness as I am 
generating up to 1500 snapshots in a row.

===
  put the windowID of this stack into savedID
import snapshot from rectangle 150,0,(width of player 1 + 
150),(height of player 1) of window savedID
export JPEG to file file_name  .jpg
delete last image
===



That's all for now!

Ian Wood
Panoramic photography, from web to billboard, sunrise to moonrise
http://www.azurevision.co.uk
P.S. An early beta can be found at http:www.azurevision.co.uk/qtvr2mov

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Database newbie questions

2003-08-02 Thread John R. Brauer
Hello all,

I am a newbie. I am working on a project which will require that I store data in a database (a separate record for each client, and about six hundred fields per record). Each time it is used, it will need to generate a new record for that client (it is a program that will administer and score an exam of sorts) My questions:

a) which database would you suggest (I guess that Oracle, MySQL and Valentina are my options)?

b) is there an internal way of doing this instead of one of the above databases?

c) will the standalone app then incorporate the database functions, or will the enduser be required to have the database in question installed on their computer as well?

Sorry if this duplicates, I inadvertently used a wrong email address the first time, adn do not know if it will get through the moderator that way. Thank you much...


Sincerely,


John R. Brauer, Psy.D.
Clinical Psychologist

Re: Database newbie questions

2003-08-02 Thread Pierre Sahores
John R. Brauer wrote:
Hello all,

I am a newbie. I am working on a project which will require that I store 
data in a database (a separate record for each client, and about six 
hundred fields per record). Each time it is used, it will need to 
generate a new record for that client (it is a program that will 
administer and score an exam of sorts) My questions:

a) which database would you suggest (I guess that Oracle, MySQL and 
Valentina are my options)?

b) is there an internal way of doing this instead of one of the above 
databases?

c) will the standalone app then incorporate the database functions, or 
will the enduser be required to have the database in question installed 
on their computer as well?

Sorry if this duplicates, I inadvertently used a wrong email address the 
first time, adn do not know if it will get through the moderator that 
way. Thank you much...

Sincerely,

John R. Brauer, Psy.D.
Clinical Psychologist
Hi,

In about concurrency and write-mode accesses, PostgreSQL 7.xx (ACID 
compliant) and MySQL 4.xx are two of the best unexpensive db-engines you 
can use behind RR (use the Rev-DB library to connect them).

P.S.: MySQL 5.xx will be a great issue and the first full ACID compliant
ever done by MySQL AG, including most of the SAPDB engine features...
--
Bien cordialement, Pierre Sahores
Inspection académique de Seine-Saint-Denis
Serveurs d'applications et SGBDR (Web/PGI)
Penser et produire l'avantage compétitif
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Database newbie questions

2003-08-02 Thread Rob Cozens
Hi Dr. Brauer,

a) which database would you suggest (I guess that Oracle, MySQL and 
Valentina are my options)?
Developer Release 1 of SDB (Serendipity Database--Binary) is 
currently being tested by the Revolution IPC group 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/revolution_ipc.  I expect to release 
DR-2 shortly after the DR-2 version of the group's IPC library is 
available.  It will be released to the Rev community at large if I 
feel the IPC library is stable enough.

b) is there an internal way of doing this instead of one of the 
above databases?
The traditional HyperCard approach would entail creating a card for 
each record.

c) will the standalone app then incorporate the database functions, 
or will the enduser be required to have the database in question 
installed on their computer as well?
I'm not sure what you are asking here.  The data itself can be in a 
stack, a text file, or a database file. Unless the data is being 
provided via a server app, it must reside in some location the 
enduser has access to.  I believe a Valentina db can be accessed 
directly by the standalone via an external, and that MySQL requires a 
separate server application running on the enduser's computer or over 
a  LAN.  SDB works in either mode with no differences in syntax.  SDB 
is hierarchical and does not support SQL query syntax.
--

Rob Cozens
CCW, Serendipity Software Company
http://www.oenolog.com/who.htm
And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three;
Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee.
from The Triple Foole by John Donne (1572-1631)
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


  1   2   >