Re: Feedback: Today conference

2020-04-14 Thread R. Scholz 

All right, then on Thursday.

Best regards,

René



Am 14.04.2020 um 18:52 schrieb i...@bureau-de-poste.net:


Hello,

I only want to meet in a test room if there are a minimum of 4 
simultaneous users, so I won't be available today. Why don't we try to 
do this on Thursday, at 19:00 UTC (London) time. That will give others 
a chance to plan this. If others have a better time, please say so .


Regards,

Ed

Quoting "R. Scholz" >:



Hello,

I use a "solid" version - when CEO's will make a meeting I am too 
anxious to change only parts.


OM
Version 5.0.0-M4-SNAPSHOT
Revision 47fe95a
Builddate 2020-04-04T17:02:12Z

Kurento is version 6.10.

€Ed: A very nice idea. I try to be at home today in the evening - I 
hope I can participate at 19h UTC.


Best regards,

René

Am 14.04.2020 um 14:12 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:

@Rene,
what version of Om are you using?
is it "solid" build or some build with updated "parts"?
what version of KMS are you using?
@Ed,
demo-next server has been started for this :)
I'm not sure if I can participate, too much work right now :(

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 18:19, > wrote:


Hello All,

I have an interesting idea, I think. The test server at
https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/signin seems to me to be
very fast. Why don't many of us testers agree to meet at a
specific time in a specific room - I suggest the Public Video
and Whiteboard Room (room no. 4), and if we have 5 or more
people, we can see for ourselves how fast it is, and whether or
not video conference participants need to exit and re-login to
actively participate in a conference. I had that problem with
5.0.0 M3 with only 2 users, and I had to either refresh one user
every once in a while, or - what worked better - re-login at
least once.

I am available to test this at 19h UTC or Grenwich Mean Time
(London Time) most days - for example today, Tuesday April 14,
or tomorrow, Wednesday April 15th.

Can anyone agree on a date and time and meet virtually in room
number 4 to test it?

Best regards,

Ed

Quoting "R. Scholz" mailto:rene.sch...@abakus-edv-systems.de>>:


Hello,

today we had a video-conference with 7 people. All had a small
video-size with 120x90 and microphone switch on (default, 22050
rate, 32k bitrate).

While the 1,5h conference every participant must from time to
time make a new login. At first the video goes slwoly (end
stand still), the voice
is clanking, than they must login new. After that all is OK.
Good video, good sound.

I use a 100MBit synchronous Fiberchannel for our OM-server.

It was a conference between the CEO's from me and another
"global player".
It bugs me that the CEO's from the other side said that "Zoom
runs better". (They hat tested Zoom the last weeks.)



Is there a possibility to make our OM "more tolerant"?

Best regards,
René




--
Best regards,
Maxim

Re: Feedback: Today conference

2020-04-14 Thread info 

 Hello,

I only want to meet in a test room if there are a minimum of 4  
simultaneous users, so I won't be available today. Why don't we try to  
do this on Thursday, at 19:00 UTC (London) time. That will give others  
a chance to plan this. If others have a better time, please say so .


Regards,

 Ed

Quoting "R. Scholz" :


Hello,

I use a "solid" version - when CEO's will make a meeting I am too  
anxious to change only parts.


OM
Version 5.0.0-M4-SNAPSHOT
Revision 47fe95a
Builddate 2020-04-04T17:02:12Z

Kurento is version 6.10.

€Ed: A very nice idea. I try to be at home today in the evening - I  
hope I can participate at 19h UTC.


Best regards,

René

  Am 14.04.2020 um 14:12 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:


@Rene, 
what version of Om are you using?
is it "solid" build or some build with updated "parts"?
what version of KMS are you using?
 
@Ed,
demo-next server has been started for this :)
I'm not sure if I can participate, too much work right now :(

   On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 18:19,  wrote:


Hello All,

I have an interesting idea, I think. The test server  
at https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/signin seems to me to be  
very fast. Why don't many of us testers agree to meet at a  
specific time in a specific room - I suggest the Public Video and  
Whiteboard Room (room no. 4), and if we have 5 or more people, we  
can see for ourselves how fast it is, and whether or not video  
conference participants need to exit and re-login to actively  
participate in a conference. I had that problem with 5.0.0 M3 with  
only 2 users, and I had to either refresh one user every once in a  
while, or - what worked better - re-login at least once. 


I am available to test this at 19h UTC or Grenwich Mean Time  
(London Time) most days - for example today, Tuesday April 14, or  
tomorrow, Wednesday April 15th.


Can anyone agree on a date and time and meet virtually in room  
number 4 to test it?


Best regards,

Ed

Quoting "R. Scholz" :


Hello,

today we had a video-conference with 7 people. All had a small  
video-size with 120x90 and microphone switch on (default, 22050  
rate, 32k bitrate).


While the 1,5h conference every participant must from time to  
time make a new login. At first the video goes slwoly (end stand  
still), the voice
is clanking, than they must login new. After that all is OK. Good  
video, good sound.


I use a 100MBit synchronous Fiberchannel for our OM-server.

It was a conference between the CEO's from me and another "global player".
It bugs me that the CEO's from the other side said that "Zoom  
runs better". (They hat tested Zoom the last weeks.)




Is there a possibility to make our OM "more tolerant"?

Best regards,
René



 


    
--
Best regards,
Maxim

Re: Feedback: Today conference

2020-04-14 Thread Maxim Solodovnik 
Yes
Just skip import/export
Use db as-is
Should work
Please check build date of the build
Should be "today"

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 20:56 R. Scholz 
wrote:

> Hello Maxim,
>
> OK, I will do it.
> Is there a chance to let the room-IDs as is now?
>
> Best regards,
>
> René
>
>
> Am 14.04.2020 um 15:36 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
> Please update both OM and KMS (6.13.0 is the latest version)
>
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 20:07, R. Scholz 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I use a "solid" version - when CEO's will make a meeting I am too anxious
>> to change only parts.
>>
>> OM
>> Version 5.0.0-M4-SNAPSHOT
>> Revision 47fe95a
>> Builddate 2020-04-04T17:02:12Z
>>
>> Kurento is version 6.10.
>>
>> €Ed: A very nice idea. I try to be at home today in the evening - I hope
>> I can participate at 19h UTC.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> René
>>
>> Am 14.04.2020 um 14:12 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>
>> @Rene,
>>
>> what version of Om are you using?
>> is it "solid" build or some build with updated "parts"?
>> what version of KMS are you using?
>>
>> @Ed,
>> demo-next server has been started for this :)
>> I'm not sure if I can participate, too much work right now :(
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 18:19,  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> I have an interesting idea, I think. The test server at
>>> https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/signin seems to me to be very
>>> fast. Why don't many of us testers agree to meet at a specific time in a
>>> specific room - I suggest the Public Video and Whiteboard Room (room no.
>>> 4), and if we have 5 or more people, we can see for ourselves how fast it
>>> is, and whether or not video conference participants need to exit and
>>> re-login to actively participate in a conference. I had that problem with
>>> 5.0.0 M3 with only 2 users, and I had to either refresh one user every once
>>> in a while, or - what worked better - re-login at least once.
>>>
>>> I am available to test this at 19h UTC or Grenwich Mean Time (London
>>> Time) most days - for example today, Tuesday April 14, or tomorrow,
>>> Wednesday April 15th.
>>>
>>> Can anyone agree on a date and time and meet virtually in room number 4
>>> to test it?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> Quoting "R. Scholz" :
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> today we had a video-conference with 7 people. All had a small
>>> video-size with 120x90 and microphone switch on (default, 22050 rate, 32k
>>> bitrate).
>>>
>>> While the 1,5h conference every participant must from time to time make
>>> a new login. At first the video goes slwoly (end stand still), the voice
>>> is clanking, than they must login new. After that all is OK. Good video,
>>> good sound.
>>>
>>> I use a 100MBit synchronous Fiberchannel for our OM-server.
>>>
>>> It was a conference between the CEO's from me and another "global
>>> player".
>>> It bugs me that the CEO's from the other side said that "Zoom runs
>>> better". (They hat tested Zoom the last weeks.)
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> Is there a possibility to make our OM "more tolerant"?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> René
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Maxim
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim
>
>
>

Re: Feedback: Today conference

2020-04-14 Thread R. Scholz 

Hello Maxim,

OK, I will do it.
Is there a chance to let the room-IDs as is now?

Best regards,

René


Am 14.04.2020 um 15:36 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:

Please update both OM and KMS (6.13.0 is the latest version)

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 20:07, R. Scholz 
> wrote:


Hello,

I use a "solid" version - when CEO's will make a meeting I am too
anxious to change only parts.

OM
Version 5.0.0-M4-SNAPSHOT
Revision 47fe95a
Builddate 2020-04-04T17:02:12Z

Kurento is version 6.10.

€Ed: A very nice idea. I try to be at home today in the evening -
I hope I can participate at 19h UTC.

Best regards,

René

Am 14.04.2020 um 14:12 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:

@Rene,

what version of Om are you using?
is it "solid" build or some build with updated "parts"?
what version of KMS are you using?

@Ed,
demo-next server has been started for this :)
I'm not sure if I can participate, too much work right now :(

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 18:19, mailto:i...@bureau-de-poste.net>> wrote:

Hello All,

I have an interesting idea, I think. The test server at
https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/signin seems to me to
be very fast. Why don't many of us testers agree to meet at a
specific time in a specific room - I suggest the Public Video
and Whiteboard Room (room no. 4), and if we have 5 or more
people, we can see for ourselves how fast it is, and whether
or not video conference participants need to exit and
re-login to actively participate in a conference. I had that
problem with 5.0.0 M3 with only 2 users, and I had to either
refresh one user every once in a while, or - what worked
better - re-login at least once.

I am available to test this at 19h UTC or Grenwich Mean Time
(London Time) most days - for example today, Tuesday April
14, or tomorrow, Wednesday April 15th.

Can anyone agree on a date and time and meet virtually in
room number 4 to test it?

Best regards,

Ed

Quoting "R. Scholz" mailto:rene.sch...@abakus-edv-systems.de>>:


Hello,

today we had a video-conference with 7 people. All had a
small video-size with 120x90 and microphone switch on
(default, 22050 rate, 32k bitrate).

While the 1,5h conference every participant must from time
to time make a new login. At first the video goes slwoly
(end stand still), the voice
is clanking, than they must login new. After that all is OK.
Good video, good sound.

I use a 100MBit synchronous Fiberchannel for our OM-server.

It was a conference between the CEO's from me and another
"global player".
It bugs me that the CEO's from the other side said that
"Zoom runs better". (They hat tested Zoom the last weeks.)



Is there a possibility to make our OM "more tolerant"?

Best regards,
René






-- 
Best regards,

Maxim




--
Best regards,
Maxim

Re: Feedback: Today conference

2020-04-14 Thread Maxim Solodovnik 
Please update both OM and KMS (6.13.0 is the latest version)

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 20:07, R. Scholz 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I use a "solid" version - when CEO's will make a meeting I am too anxious
> to change only parts.
>
> OM
> Version 5.0.0-M4-SNAPSHOT
> Revision 47fe95a
> Builddate 2020-04-04T17:02:12Z
>
> Kurento is version 6.10.
>
> €Ed: A very nice idea. I try to be at home today in the evening - I hope I
> can participate at 19h UTC.
>
> Best regards,
>
> René
>
> Am 14.04.2020 um 14:12 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
> @Rene,
>
> what version of Om are you using?
> is it "solid" build or some build with updated "parts"?
> what version of KMS are you using?
>
> @Ed,
> demo-next server has been started for this :)
> I'm not sure if I can participate, too much work right now :(
>
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 18:19,  wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I have an interesting idea, I think. The test server at
>> https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/signin seems to me to be very
>> fast. Why don't many of us testers agree to meet at a specific time in a
>> specific room - I suggest the Public Video and Whiteboard Room (room no.
>> 4), and if we have 5 or more people, we can see for ourselves how fast it
>> is, and whether or not video conference participants need to exit and
>> re-login to actively participate in a conference. I had that problem with
>> 5.0.0 M3 with only 2 users, and I had to either refresh one user every once
>> in a while, or - what worked better - re-login at least once.
>>
>> I am available to test this at 19h UTC or Grenwich Mean Time (London
>> Time) most days - for example today, Tuesday April 14, or tomorrow,
>> Wednesday April 15th.
>>
>> Can anyone agree on a date and time and meet virtually in room number 4
>> to test it?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> Quoting "R. Scholz" :
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> today we had a video-conference with 7 people. All had a small video-size
>> with 120x90 and microphone switch on (default, 22050 rate, 32k bitrate).
>>
>> While the 1,5h conference every participant must from time to time make a
>> new login. At first the video goes slwoly (end stand still), the voice
>> is clanking, than they must login new. After that all is OK. Good video,
>> good sound.
>>
>> I use a 100MBit synchronous Fiberchannel for our OM-server.
>>
>> It was a conference between the CEO's from me and another "global player".
>> It bugs me that the CEO's from the other side said that "Zoom runs
>> better". (They hat tested Zoom the last weeks.)
>>
>> 
>>
>> Is there a possibility to make our OM "more tolerant"?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> René
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim
>
>
>

-- 
Best regards,
Maxim

Re: Feedback: Today conference

2020-04-14 Thread R. Scholz 

Hello,

I use a "solid" version - when CEO's will make a meeting I am too 
anxious to change only parts.


OM
Version 5.0.0-M4-SNAPSHOT
Revision 47fe95a
Builddate 2020-04-04T17:02:12Z

Kurento is version 6.10.

€Ed: A very nice idea. I try to be at home today in the evening - I hope 
I can participate at 19h UTC.


Best regards,

René

Am 14.04.2020 um 14:12 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:

@Rene,

what version of Om are you using?
is it "solid" build or some build with updated "parts"?
what version of KMS are you using?

@Ed,
demo-next server has been started for this :)
I'm not sure if I can participate, too much work right now :(

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 18:19, > wrote:


Hello All,

I have an interesting idea, I think. The test server at
https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/signin seems to me to be
very fast. Why don't many of us testers agree to meet at a
specific time in a specific room - I suggest the Public Video and
Whiteboard Room (room no. 4), and if we have 5 or more people, we
can see for ourselves how fast it is, and whether or not video
conference participants need to exit and re-login to actively
participate in a conference. I had that problem with 5.0.0 M3 with
only 2 users, and I had to either refresh one user every once in a
while, or - what worked better - re-login at least once.

I am available to test this at 19h UTC or Grenwich Mean Time
(London Time) most days - for example today, Tuesday April 14, or
tomorrow, Wednesday April 15th.

Can anyone agree on a date and time and meet virtually in room
number 4 to test it?

Best regards,

Ed

Quoting "R. Scholz" mailto:rene.sch...@abakus-edv-systems.de>>:


Hello,

today we had a video-conference with 7 people. All had a small
video-size with 120x90 and microphone switch on (default, 22050
rate, 32k bitrate).

While the 1,5h conference every participant must from time to
time make a new login. At first the video goes slwoly (end stand
still), the voice
is clanking, than they must login new. After that all is OK. Good
video, good sound.

I use a 100MBit synchronous Fiberchannel for our OM-server.

It was a conference between the CEO's from me and another "global
player".
It bugs me that the CEO's from the other side said that "Zoom
runs better". (They hat tested Zoom the last weeks.)



Is there a possibility to make our OM "more tolerant"?

Best regards,
René






--
Best regards,
Maxim

Re: Feedback: Today conference

2020-04-14 Thread Maxim Solodovnik 
@Rene,

what version of Om are you using?
is it "solid" build or some build with updated "parts"?
what version of KMS are you using?

@Ed,
demo-next server has been started for this :)
I'm not sure if I can participate, too much work right now :(

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 18:19,  wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> I have an interesting idea, I think. The test server at
> https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/signin seems to me to be very
> fast. Why don't many of us testers agree to meet at a specific time in a
> specific room - I suggest the Public Video and Whiteboard Room (room no.
> 4), and if we have 5 or more people, we can see for ourselves how fast it
> is, and whether or not video conference participants need to exit and
> re-login to actively participate in a conference. I had that problem with
> 5.0.0 M3 with only 2 users, and I had to either refresh one user every once
> in a while, or - what worked better - re-login at least once.
>
> I am available to test this at 19h UTC or Grenwich Mean Time (London Time)
> most days - for example today, Tuesday April 14, or tomorrow, Wednesday
> April 15th.
>
> Can anyone agree on a date and time and meet virtually in room number 4 to
> test it?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ed
>
> Quoting "R. Scholz" :
>
> Hello,
>
> today we had a video-conference with 7 people. All had a small video-size
> with 120x90 and microphone switch on (default, 22050 rate, 32k bitrate).
>
> While the 1,5h conference every participant must from time to time make a
> new login. At first the video goes slwoly (end stand still), the voice
> is clanking, than they must login new. After that all is OK. Good video,
> good sound.
>
> I use a 100MBit synchronous Fiberchannel for our OM-server.
>
> It was a conference between the CEO's from me and another "global player".
> It bugs me that the CEO's from the other side said that "Zoom runs
> better". (They hat tested Zoom the last weeks.)
>
> 
>
> Is there a possibility to make our OM "more tolerant"?
>
> Best regards,
> René
>
>
>
>

-- 
Best regards,
Maxim

Re: Feedback: Today conference

2020-04-14 Thread info 

 Hello All,

I have an interesting idea, I think. The test server  
at https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/signin seems to me to be  
very fast. Why don't many of us testers agree to meet at a specific  
time in a specific room - I suggest the Public Video and Whiteboard  
Room (room no. 4), and if we have 5 or more people, we can see for  
ourselves how fast it is, and whether or not video conference  
participants need to exit and re-login to actively participate in a  
conference. I had that problem with 5.0.0 M3 with only 2 users, and I  
had to either refresh one user every once in a while, or - what worked  
better - re-login at least once. 


I am available to test this at 19h UTC or Grenwich Mean Time (London  
Time) most days - for example today, Tuesday April 14, or tomorrow,  
Wednesday April 15th.


Can anyone agree on a date and time and meet virtually in room number  
4 to test it?


Best regards,

Ed

Quoting "R. Scholz" :


Hello,

today we had a video-conference with 7 people. All had a small  
video-size with 120x90 and microphone switch on (default, 22050  
rate, 32k bitrate).


While the 1,5h conference every participant must from time to time  
make a new login. At first the video goes slwoly (end stand still),  
the voice
is clanking, than they must login new. After that all is OK. Good  
video, good sound.


I use a 100MBit synchronous Fiberchannel for our OM-server.

It was a conference between the CEO's from me and another "global player".
It bugs me that the CEO's from the other side said that "Zoom runs  
better". (They hat tested Zoom the last weeks.)




Is there a possibility to make our OM "more tolerant"?

Best regards,
René