@Rene,

what version of Om are you using?
is it "solid" build or some build with updated "parts"?
what version of KMS are you using?

@Ed,
demo-next server has been started for this :)
I'm not sure if I can participate, too much work right now :(

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 18:19, <i...@bureau-de-poste.net> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> I have an interesting idea, I think. The test server at
> https://om.alteametasoft.com:8443/next/signin seems to me to be very
> fast. Why don't many of us testers agree to meet at a specific time in a
> specific room - I suggest the Public Video and Whiteboard Room (room no.
> 4), and if we have 5 or more people, we can see for ourselves how fast it
> is, and whether or not video conference participants need to exit and
> re-login to actively participate in a conference. I had that problem with
> 5.0.0 M3 with only 2 users, and I had to either refresh one user every once
> in a while, or - what worked better - re-login at least once.
>
> I am available to test this at 19h UTC or Grenwich Mean Time (London Time)
> most days - for example today, Tuesday April 14, or tomorrow, Wednesday
> April 15th.
>
> Can anyone agree on a date and time and meet virtually in room number 4 to
> test it?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ed
>
> Quoting "R. Scholz" <rene.sch...@abakus-edv-systems.de>:
>
> Hello,
>
> today we had a video-conference with 7 people. All had a small video-size
> with 120x90 and microphone switch on (default, 22050 rate, 32k bitrate).
>
> While the 1,5h conference every participant must from time to time make a
> new login. At first the video goes slwoly (end stand still), the voice
> is clanking, than they must login new. After that all is OK. Good video,
> good sound.
>
> I use a 100MBit synchronous Fiberchannel for our OM-server.
>
> It was a conference between the CEO's from me and another "global player".
> It bugs me that the CEO's from the other side said that "Zoom runs
> better". (They hat tested Zoom the last weeks.)
>
> <Grrr>
>
> Is there a possibility to make our OM "more tolerant"?
>
> Best regards,
> René
>
>
>
>

-- 
Best regards,
Maxim

Reply via email to