Re: Giving anonymous processors an identity - is there an annoation for that?
will this work with the camel:dot task in maven? If you do not
override the toString() method in your org.apache.camel.Processor, the
text in the output .png file just shows as a class instance string.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Its a known issue with the tracer when it gets a bit more complex when
using interceptors etc.
Its listed in the known issue section in the release notes.
And we got a couple of JIRA tickets about this.
A rework on internals in Camel 3 should help us make this work better
than we currently can do in 2.x.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Christian Müller
christian.muel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Claus, hello Ade!
I modified the test a bit on my machine. I added the following two lines to
enable the default tracer:
{code:java}
context.setTracing(true);
context.getInterceptStrategies().add(new Tracer());
{code}
I received the following log statements:
{code}
2010-10-08 23:13:14,164 [main ] INFO
Tracer -
ID-christian-muellers-macbook-pro-local-56443-1286572393506-0-2 (foo)
from(direct://start) -- log://foo Pattern:InOnly, BodyType:String,
Body:Hello World
2010-10-08 23:13:14,165 [main ] INFO
foo - Exchange[ExchangePattern:InOnly,
BodyType:String, Body:Hello World]
2010-10-08 23:13:14,168 [main ] INFO
Tracer -
ID-christian-muellers-macbook-pro-local-56443-1286572393506-0-2 (foo)
log://foo --
org.apache.camel.processor.inlinedprocessoridtest$...@786c1a82
Pattern:InOnly, BodyType:String, Body:Hello World
2010-10-08 23:13:14,169 [main ] INFO
Tracer -
ID-christian-muellers-macbook-pro-local-56443-1286572393506-0-2 (foo)
org.apache.camel.processor.inlinedprocessoridtest$...@786c1a82 --
mock://result Pattern:InOnly, Headers:{foo=123}, BodyType:String,
Body:Hello World
{code}
That's not what we want, is it? Instead of log://foo --
org.apache.camel.processor.inlinedprocessoridtest$...@786c1a82 I expected
log -- inlined.
Have a nice weekend,
Christian
P.S. Looking forward to the FUSE community day in Paris.
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
Re: Giving anonymous processors an identity - is there an annoation for that?
Hi
Its a known issue with the tracer when it gets a bit more complex when
using interceptors etc.
Its listed in the known issue section in the release notes.
And we got a couple of JIRA tickets about this.
A rework on internals in Camel 3 should help us make this work better
than we currently can do in 2.x.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Christian Müller
christian.muel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Claus, hello Ade!
I modified the test a bit on my machine. I added the following two lines to
enable the default tracer:
{code:java}
context.setTracing(true);
context.getInterceptStrategies().add(new Tracer());
{code}
I received the following log statements:
{code}
2010-10-08 23:13:14,164 [main ] INFO
Tracer -
ID-christian-muellers-macbook-pro-local-56443-1286572393506-0-2 (foo)
from(direct://start) -- log://foo Pattern:InOnly, BodyType:String,
Body:Hello World
2010-10-08 23:13:14,165 [main ] INFO
foo - Exchange[ExchangePattern:InOnly,
BodyType:String, Body:Hello World]
2010-10-08 23:13:14,168 [main ] INFO
Tracer -
ID-christian-muellers-macbook-pro-local-56443-1286572393506-0-2 (foo)
log://foo --
org.apache.camel.processor.inlinedprocessoridtest$...@786c1a82
Pattern:InOnly, BodyType:String, Body:Hello World
2010-10-08 23:13:14,169 [main ] INFO
Tracer -
ID-christian-muellers-macbook-pro-local-56443-1286572393506-0-2 (foo)
org.apache.camel.processor.inlinedprocessoridtest$...@786c1a82 --
mock://result Pattern:InOnly, Headers:{foo=123}, BodyType:String,
Body:Hello World
{code}
That's not what we want, is it? Instead of log://foo --
org.apache.camel.processor.inlinedprocessoridtest$...@786c1a82 I expected
log -- inlined.
Have a nice weekend,
Christian
P.S. Looking forward to the FUSE community day in Paris.
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
Giving anonymous processors an identity - is there an annoation for that?
Is it possible to give an anonymous inline Processor an identity using a Java
annotation? Am thinking that this would be great for trace or audit
purposes, where you want a tracer or interceptor to log/audit that a
particular processor on the route has been invoked.
I'm not sure if you can put an annotation on an inline anonymous class;
however, we could perhaps simply annotate the process() method. Something
like this:
from(...)
.process(new Processor() {
@Processor(label = doImportantStuff)
public void process(Exchange ex) throws Exception {
}
});
Does such an annotation exist in Camel? If not, then do you think this is a
good idea?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Giving-anonymous-processors-an-identity-is-there-an-annoation-for-that-tp3204380p3204380.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Giving anonymous processors an identity - is there an annoation for that?
Hi
Maybe we should make sure you can use .id(xxx) as the rest of the
DSL with an inlined anonym as well.
I actually don't know if you can do that. But I can check it out :)
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Ade adrian.trena...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is it possible to give an anonymous inline Processor an identity using a Java
annotation? Am thinking that this would be great for trace or audit
purposes, where you want a tracer or interceptor to log/audit that a
particular processor on the route has been invoked.
I'm not sure if you can put an annotation on an inline anonymous class;
however, we could perhaps simply annotate the process() method. Something
like this:
from(...)
.process(new Processor() {
�...@processor(label = doImportantStuff)
public void process(Exchange ex) throws Exception {
}
});
Does such an annotation exist in Camel? If not, then do you think this is a
good idea?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Giving-anonymous-processors-an-identity-is-there-an-annoation-for-that-tp3204380p3204380.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
Re: Giving anonymous processors an identity - is there an annoation for that?
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Maybe we should make sure you can use .id(xxx) as the rest of the
DSL with an inlined anonym as well.
I actually don't know if you can do that. But I can check it out :)
Works fine see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1005791view=rev
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Ade adrian.trena...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is it possible to give an anonymous inline Processor an identity using a Java
annotation? Am thinking that this would be great for trace or audit
purposes, where you want a tracer or interceptor to log/audit that a
particular processor on the route has been invoked.
I'm not sure if you can put an annotation on an inline anonymous class;
however, we could perhaps simply annotate the process() method. Something
like this:
from(...)
.process(new Processor() {
�...@processor(label = doImportantStuff)
public void process(Exchange ex) throws Exception {
}
});
Does such an annotation exist in Camel? If not, then do you think this is a
good idea?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Giving-anonymous-processors-an-identity-is-there-an-annoation-for-that-tp3204380p3204380.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
Re: Giving anonymous processors an identity - is there an annoation for that?
Sweet!
Very, very nice. Thanks Claus! Am now compelled to buy you a beer at the
FUSE Community Day in Paris next week :)
On 08/10/2010 12:59, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Claus Ibsenclaus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Maybe we should make sure you can use .id(xxx) as the rest of the
DSL with an inlined anonym as well.
I actually don't know if you can do that. But I can check it out :)
Works fine see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1005791view=rev
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Adeadrian.trena...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is it possible to give an anonymous inline Processor an identity using a Java
annotation? Am thinking that this would be great for trace or audit
purposes, where you want a tracer or interceptor to log/audit that a
particular processor on the route has been invoked.
I'm not sure if you can put an annotation on an inline anonymous class;
however, we could perhaps simply annotate the process() method. Something
like this:
from(...)
.process(new Processor() {
@Processor(label = doImportantStuff)
public void process(Exchange ex) throws Exception {
}
});
Does such an annotation exist in Camel? If not, then do you think this is a
good idea?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Giving-anonymous-processors-an-identity-is-there-an-annoation-for-that-tp3204380p3204380.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
Re: Giving anonymous processors an identity - is there an annoation for that?
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Adrian Trenaman trena...@progress.com wrote:
Sweet!
Very, very nice. Thanks Claus! Am now compelled to buy you a beer at the
FUSE Community Day in Paris next week :)
Cool didn't you bring back some Victorian Bitters from down under ?
But hey I bet everybody got reasons to buy a round of beer.
On 08/10/2010 12:59, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Claus Ibsenclaus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Maybe we should make sure you can use .id(xxx) as the rest of the
DSL with an inlined anonym as well.
I actually don't know if you can do that. But I can check it out :)
Works fine see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1005791view=rev
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Adeadrian.trena...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Is it possible to give an anonymous inline Processor an identity using a
Java
annotation? Am thinking that this would be great for trace or audit
purposes, where you want a tracer or interceptor to log/audit that a
particular processor on the route has been invoked.
I'm not sure if you can put an annotation on an inline anonymous class;
however, we could perhaps simply annotate the process() method.
Something
like this:
from(...)
.process(new Processor() {
�...@processor(label = doImportantStuff)
public void process(Exchange ex) throws Exception {
}
});
Does such an annotation exist in Camel? If not, then do you think this
is a
good idea?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Giving-anonymous-processors-an-identity-is-there-an-annoation-for-that-tp3204380p3204380.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
Re: Giving anonymous processors an identity - is there an annoation for that?
Any Victorian Bitters I encountered, I swiftly quaffed ;)
On 08/10/2010 13:05, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Adrian Trenamantrena...@progress.com wrote:
Sweet!
Very, very nice. Thanks Claus! Am now compelled to buy you a beer at the
FUSE Community Day in Paris next week :)
Cool didn't you bring back some Victorian Bitters from down under ?
But hey I bet everybody got reasons to buy a round of beer.
On 08/10/2010 12:59, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Claus Ibsenclaus.ib...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
Maybe we should make sure you can use .id(xxx) as the rest of the
DSL with an inlined anonym as well.
I actually don't know if you can do that. But I can check it out :)
Works fine see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1005791view=rev
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Adeadrian.trena...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Is it possible to give an anonymous inline Processor an identity using a
Java
annotation? Am thinking that this would be great for trace or audit
purposes, where you want a tracer or interceptor to log/audit that a
particular processor on the route has been invoked.
I'm not sure if you can put an annotation on an inline anonymous class;
however, we could perhaps simply annotate the process() method.
Something
like this:
from(...)
.process(new Processor() {
@Processor(label = doImportantStuff)
public void process(Exchange ex) throws Exception {
}
});
Does such an annotation exist in Camel? If not, then do you think this
is a
good idea?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Giving-anonymous-processors-an-identity-is-there-an-annoation-for-that-tp3204380p3204380.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
Re: Giving anonymous processors an identity - is there an annoation for that?
Hello Claus, hello Ade!
I modified the test a bit on my machine. I added the following two lines to
enable the default tracer:
{code:java}
context.setTracing(true);
context.getInterceptStrategies().add(new Tracer());
{code}
I received the following log statements:
{code}
2010-10-08 23:13:14,164 [main ] INFO
Tracer -
ID-christian-muellers-macbook-pro-local-56443-1286572393506-0-2 (foo)
from(direct://start) -- log://foo Pattern:InOnly, BodyType:String,
Body:Hello World
2010-10-08 23:13:14,165 [main ] INFO
foo- Exchange[ExchangePattern:InOnly,
BodyType:String, Body:Hello World]
2010-10-08 23:13:14,168 [main ] INFO
Tracer -
ID-christian-muellers-macbook-pro-local-56443-1286572393506-0-2 (foo)
log://foo -- org.apache.camel.processor.inlinedprocessoridtest$...@786c1a82
Pattern:InOnly, BodyType:String, Body:Hello World
2010-10-08 23:13:14,169 [main ] INFO
Tracer -
ID-christian-muellers-macbook-pro-local-56443-1286572393506-0-2 (foo)
org.apache.camel.processor.inlinedprocessoridtest$...@786c1a82 --
mock://result Pattern:InOnly, Headers:{foo=123}, BodyType:String,
Body:Hello World
{code}
That's not what we want, is it? Instead of log://foo --
org.apache.camel.processor.inlinedprocessoridtest$...@786c1a82 I expected
log -- inlined.
Have a nice weekend,
Christian
P.S. Looking forward to the FUSE community day in Paris.
