Re: [URGENT] Mounting issues from KVM hosts to secondary storage

[Kirk Kosinski]

> And how about virsh pool-list result which is not reflecting the
> actual IDs of the secondary storage we see from Cloudstack GUI, is it
> supposed to be the case? If not, how to rectify it?

This is normal.  More than one pool pointing to secondary storage can
exist at a time so they can't all be named after the ID in CloudStack.

Best regards,
Kirk

On 10/03/2013 01:30 PM, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
> 
> Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
> 
> We will try to do what you have suggested and will see if we can fix the
> problem. I am looking into increasing the filesystem of the KVM hosts to
> see if it can resolve the problem for now.
> 
> Thank you very much for your help!
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Marcus Sorensen  wrote:
> 
>> You'll have to go back further in the log then, and/or go to the agent
>> log, because the issue of the ghost mount is due to the filesystem
>> being full, and if that's your secondary storage I'm not sure why it
>> would be written to from the kvm host unless you were doing backups or
>> snapshots.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Indra Pramana  wrote:
>>> Hi Marcus,
>>>
>>> It happens randomly, mounting fails, and then / gets filled. I suspect
>> this
>>> occurs when the mounting fails, any files which is supposed to be
>>> transferred to the mount point (e.g. templates used to create VMs) will
>>> fill-up the / partition of the KVM host instead. This doesn't happen in
>>> 4.1.1, this only happens after we upgraded to 4.2.0.
>>>
>>> And how about virsh pool-list result which is not reflecting the actual
>> IDs
>>> of the secondary storage we see from Cloudstack GUI, is it supposed to be
>>> the case? If not, how to rectify it?
>>>
>>> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Marcus Sorensen 
>> wrote:
>>>
 It sort of looks like the out of space triggered the issue. Libvirt
>> shows

 2013-10-03 15:38:57.414+: 2710: error : virCommandWait:2348 :
 internal error Child process (/bin/umount
 /mnt/5230667e-9c58-3ff6-983c-5fc2a72df669) unexpected exit status 32:
 error writing /etc/mtab.tmp: No space left on device

 So that entry of the filesystem being mounted is orphaned in
 /etc/mtab, since it can't be removed. That seems to be the source of
 why 'df' shows the thing mounted when it isn't, at least.


 On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Indra Pramana  wrote:
> Hi Marcus and all,
>
> I also find some strange and interesting error messages from the
>> libvirt
> logs:
>
> http://pastebin.com/5ByfNpAf
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Indra Pramana  wrote:
>
>> Hi Marcus,
>>
>> Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. See my reply inline.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Marcus Sorensen <
>> shadow...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>> Are you using the release artifacts, or your own 4.2 build?
>>>
>>
>> [Indra:] We are using the release artifacts from below repo since we
>> are
>> using Ubuntu:
>>
>> deb http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu precise 4.2
>>
>>
>>> When you rebooted the host, did the problem go away or come back the
>>> same?
>>
>>
>> [Indra:] When I rebooted the host, the problem go away for a while,
>> but
 it
>> will come back again after some time. It will come randomly at the
>> time
>> when we need to create a new instance on that host, or start an
>> existing
>> stopped instance.
>>
>>
>>> You may want to look at 'virsh pool-list' to see if libvirt is
>>> mounting/registering the secondary storage.
>>>
>>
>> [Indra:] This is the result of the virsh pool-list command:
>>
>> root@hv-kvm-02:/var/log/libvirt# virsh pool-list
>> Name State  Autostart
>> -
>> 301071ac-4c1d-4eac-855b-124126da0a38 active no
>> 5230667e-9c58-3ff6-983c-5fc2a72df669 active no
>> d433809b-01ea-3947-ba0f-48077244e4d6 active no
>>
>> Strange thing is that none of my secondary storage IDs are there.
>> Could
 it
>> be that the ID might have changed during Cloudstack upgrade? Here is
>> the
>> list of my secondary storage (there are two of them) even though they
 are
>> on the same NFS server:
>>   c02da448-b9f4-401b-b8d5-83e8ead5cfde nfs://
>> 10.237.11.31/mnt/vol1/sec-storage NFS
>> 5937edb6-2e95-4ae2-907b-80fe4599ed87 nfs://
>> 10.237.11.31/mnt/vol1/sec-storage2 NFS
>>
>>> Is this happening on multiple hosts, the same way?
>>
>>
>> [Indra:] Yes, it is happening on all the two hosts that I have, the
>> same
>> way.
>>
>>
>>> You may want to
>>> look at /etc/mtab, if the system reports i

re: Virtualizing Cloudstack Manager onto XenServer host

[Kristoffer Sheather @ CloudCentral]

I would always advise having a standalone xenserver cluster for management 
purposes.  Typically consisting of 2 hosts to host the cloudstack 
management and database servers.

Regards,

 Kristoffer Sheather
 Cloud Central
 Scale Your Data Center In The Cloud 

 Phone: 1300 144 007 | Mobile: +61 414 573 130 | Email: 
k...@cloudcentral.com.au
 LinkedIn:   | Skype: kristoffer.sheather | Twitter: 
http://twitter.com/kristofferjon 


From: "David Ortiz" 
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 3:46 AM
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Subject: Virtualizing Cloudstack Manager onto XenServer host

Hello,
 I am setting up a small test cluster and decided to use XenServer this 
time with Cloudstack 4.2.0.  I would like to run the management server on 
the cluster, but since XenServer uses its own OS install rather than 
CentOS, I believe that means I cannot run the manager on it bare metal like 
I would for KVM.  Is it possible for me to create the management server on 
a VM which I then would use to connect to the cluster for cloudstack 
functionality?
Thanks,  David Ortiz

Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Dean Kamali]

I have the same extract setup (Ubuntu 12.04.2 backend, and xenserver 6.2),
using the newest ssvm, but this template issue, is a pain.




On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Travis Graham  wrote:

> I just helped someone setup their cloud last night and finished up this
> afternoon.
>
> * 4.2.0 Management Server on Ubuntu 12.04.3 acting as NFS for both Primary
> and Secondary storage
> * XenServer 6.2
>
> Travis
>
> On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:25 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
>
> > Thanks Travis
> >
> > I have http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util setup
> > in /opt/xensource/bin
> > and permissions are set correctly
> >
> > But no, luck!
> >
> > I would like to know if you ever had success getting fresh CS 4.2 setup
> > with xenserver 6.2 ?
> >
> > Thanks for your help
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Travis Graham 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Can you check your /opt/xensource/bin directory contains the vhd-util
> >> script from http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util ?
> >>
> >> Another gotcha, zones are disabled when you first create them, can you
> >> check that your zone is enabled? (you mentioned setting things up
> fresh, so
> >> that's a gotcha I've seen in fresh installs)
> >>
> >> Travis
> >>
> >> On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Travis
> >>>
> >>> I'm actually using the same image
> >>> systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
> >>>
> >>> I can confirm that there is something wrong with this image when its
> >> being
> >>> used with xenserver 6.2
> >>>
> >>> can't really think of anything else :(
> >>>
> >>> Dean
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Travis Graham 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
>  Here are the correct links for 4.2.0:
> 
>  Xenserver :
> 
> >>
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
>  KVM  :
> 
> >>
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
>  VMware   :
>  http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova
> 
>  Travis
> 
>  On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Dean Kamali 
> wrote:
> 
> > checking system vm logs /var/log/cloud.log, I see the following in
> the
>  logs
> >
> > [SSVM] Unable to start agent: Resource class not found:
>  org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource due
> >> to:
>  java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>  org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource
> >
> > storage is not mounted upon boot, even tho, I'm able to mount
> secondary
>  storage manually
> >
> > I came across this issue
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1994
> >
> > It has the extract symptoms I'm currently having
> >
> > I'm unable to find download URL for new system vm.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Dean Kamali 
>  wrote:
> > I have switched to CentOS 6.4, thinking that might resolve the issue,
>  but I'm still having the same issue, I have followed the document
> >> provided
>  by Nitin and nothing stood out being out of the ordinary, yet, I can't
>  download any templates or ISO images, keep in mind this is a fresh
> >> install
>  of 4.2 and I'm  not upgrading off 4.1.1
> >
> > I have noticed that Secondary storage vm agent doesn't show as up in
> >> the
>  UI, not sure if that's a normal behavior.
> >
> > Please view the following image:
> >
> >
> >
> > If you have trouble seeing attached image it, click here
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Shanker Balan <
>  shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> > On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:05 PM, Dean Kamali 
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Shanker
> >>
> >> Are you using Ubuntu or CentOS to run CS Management station?
> >>
> >> It is very strange that system vms boots up correctly and check
> >> scripts
> >> pass all tests.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Am on CentOS 6.4
> >
> >
> >> Please let me know
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shanker Balan
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 04-Oct-2013, at 8:09 PM, Dean Kamali 
>  wrote:
> >>>
>  Hello everyone
> 
>  I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
>  my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting
> fine,
>  yet,
>  I'm not able to register any ISO or template.
> >>>
> >>> Hi Dean,
> >>>
> >>> My local xenserver 6.2 and CS 4.2.0 is working correctly. No issues
>  so far.
> >>>
> >>>
> 
>  every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here
> >> is
> >>> what
>  I see in the logs
> >>>

Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Travis Graham]

I just helped someone setup their cloud last night and finished up this 
afternoon.

* 4.2.0 Management Server on Ubuntu 12.04.3 acting as NFS for both Primary and 
Secondary storage
* XenServer 6.2

Travis

On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:25 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:

> Thanks Travis
> 
> I have http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util setup
> in /opt/xensource/bin
> and permissions are set correctly
> 
> But no, luck!
> 
> I would like to know if you ever had success getting fresh CS 4.2 setup
> with xenserver 6.2 ?
> 
> Thanks for your help
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Travis Graham  wrote:
> 
>> Can you check your /opt/xensource/bin directory contains the vhd-util
>> script from http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util ?
>> 
>> Another gotcha, zones are disabled when you first create them, can you
>> check that your zone is enabled? (you mentioned setting things up fresh, so
>> that's a gotcha I've seen in fresh installs)
>> 
>> Travis
>> 
>> On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks Travis
>>> 
>>> I'm actually using the same image
>>> systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
>>> 
>>> I can confirm that there is something wrong with this image when its
>> being
>>> used with xenserver 6.2
>>> 
>>> can't really think of anything else :(
>>> 
>>> Dean
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Travis Graham 
>> wrote:
>>> 
 Here are the correct links for 4.2.0:
 
 Xenserver :
 
>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
 KVM  :
 
>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
 VMware   :
 http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova
 
 Travis
 
 On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
 
> checking system vm logs /var/log/cloud.log, I see the following in the
 logs
> 
> [SSVM] Unable to start agent: Resource class not found:
 org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource due
>> to:
 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
 org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource
> 
> storage is not mounted upon boot, even tho, I'm able to mount secondary
 storage manually
> 
> I came across this issue
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1994
> 
> It has the extract symptoms I'm currently having
> 
> I'm unable to find download URL for new system vm.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Thank you
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Dean Kamali 
 wrote:
> I have switched to CentOS 6.4, thinking that might resolve the issue,
 but I'm still having the same issue, I have followed the document
>> provided
 by Nitin and nothing stood out being out of the ordinary, yet, I can't
 download any templates or ISO images, keep in mind this is a fresh
>> install
 of 4.2 and I'm  not upgrading off 4.1.1
> 
> I have noticed that Secondary storage vm agent doesn't show as up in
>> the
 UI, not sure if that's a normal behavior.
> 
> Please view the following image:
> 
> 
> 
> If you have trouble seeing attached image it, click here
> 
> Thank you
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Shanker Balan <
 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:05 PM, Dean Kamali 
>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Shanker
>> 
>> Are you using Ubuntu or CentOS to run CS Management station?
>> 
>> It is very strange that system vms boots up correctly and check
>> scripts
>> pass all tests.
>> 
> 
> 
> Am on CentOS 6.4
> 
> 
>> Please let me know
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shanker Balan
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 04-Oct-2013, at 8:09 PM, Dean Kamali 
 wrote:
>>> 
 Hello everyone
 
 I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
 my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting fine,
 yet,
 I'm not able to register any ISO or template.
>>> 
>>> Hi Dean,
>>> 
>>> My local xenserver 6.2 and CS 4.2.0 is working correctly. No issues
 so far.
>>> 
>>> 
 
 every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here
>> is
>>> what
 I see in the logs
 
 2013-10-04 10:22:41,409 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
 (Timer-11:null)
>>> Seq
 8-1364983880: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver:
 v1,
 Flags: 100011,
 
>>> 
 
>> [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","request":"GET_STATUS","hvm":true,"description":"centos5","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":53687091200,"id":208,"resourceType":"TEMPL

Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Dean Kamali]

Thanks Travis

I have http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util setup
in /opt/xensource/bin
and permissions are set correctly

But no, luck!

I would like to know if you ever had success getting fresh CS 4.2 setup
with xenserver 6.2 ?

Thanks for your help


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Travis Graham  wrote:

> Can you check your /opt/xensource/bin directory contains the vhd-util
> script from http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util ?
>
> Another gotcha, zones are disabled when you first create them, can you
> check that your zone is enabled? (you mentioned setting things up fresh, so
> that's a gotcha I've seen in fresh installs)
>
> Travis
>
> On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
>
> > Thanks Travis
> >
> > I'm actually using the same image
> > systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
> >
> > I can confirm that there is something wrong with this image when its
> being
> > used with xenserver 6.2
> >
> > can't really think of anything else :(
> >
> > Dean
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Travis Graham 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Here are the correct links for 4.2.0:
> >>
> >> Xenserver :
> >>
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
> >> KVM  :
> >>
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
> >> VMware   :
> >> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova
> >>
> >> Travis
> >>
> >> On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
> >>
> >>> checking system vm logs /var/log/cloud.log, I see the following in the
> >> logs
> >>>
> >>> [SSVM] Unable to start agent: Resource class not found:
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource due
> to:
> >> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> >> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource
> >>>
> >>> storage is not mounted upon boot, even tho, I'm able to mount secondary
> >> storage manually
> >>>
> >>> I came across this issue
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1994
> >>>
> >>> It has the extract symptoms I'm currently having
> >>>
> >>> I'm unable to find download URL for new system vm.
> >>>
> >>> Any ideas?
> >>>
> >>> Thank you
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Dean Kamali 
> >> wrote:
> >>> I have switched to CentOS 6.4, thinking that might resolve the issue,
> >> but I'm still having the same issue, I have followed the document
> provided
> >> by Nitin and nothing stood out being out of the ordinary, yet, I can't
> >> download any templates or ISO images, keep in mind this is a fresh
> install
> >> of 4.2 and I'm  not upgrading off 4.1.1
> >>>
> >>> I have noticed that Secondary storage vm agent doesn't show as up in
> the
> >> UI, not sure if that's a normal behavior.
> >>>
> >>> Please view the following image:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> If you have trouble seeing attached image it, click here
> >>>
> >>> Thank you
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Shanker Balan <
> >> shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> >>> On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:05 PM, Dean Kamali 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi Shanker
> 
>  Are you using Ubuntu or CentOS to run CS Management station?
> 
>  It is very strange that system vms boots up correctly and check
> scripts
>  pass all tests.
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am on CentOS 6.4
> >>>
> >>>
>  Please let me know
> 
>  Thanks
> 
> 
>  On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shanker Balan
>  wrote:
> 
> > On 04-Oct-2013, at 8:09 PM, Dean Kamali 
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello everyone
> >>
> >> I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
> >> my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting fine,
> >> yet,
> >> I'm not able to register any ISO or template.
> >
> > Hi Dean,
> >
> > My local xenserver 6.2 and CS 4.2.0 is working correctly. No issues
> >> so far.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here
> is
> > what
> >> I see in the logs
> >>
> >> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,409 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> >> (Timer-11:null)
> > Seq
> >> 8-1364983880: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver:
> >> v1,
> >> Flags: 100011,
> >>
> >
> >>
> [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","request":"GET_STATUS","hvm":true,"description":"centos5","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":53687091200,"id":208,"resourceType":"TEMPLATE","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","_store":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
> >> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","_role":"Image"}},"url":"
> >> http://download.cloud.com/templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2
> >>
> >
> >>
> ","format":"VHD","accountId":2,"name":"208-2-208845e9-fb06-378f-aced-024455fb2bff","secUrl":"nfs://
> >> 172.16

Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Travis Graham]

Can you check your /opt/xensource/bin directory contains the vhd-util script 
from http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util ?

Another gotcha, zones are disabled when you first create them, can you check 
that your zone is enabled? (you mentioned setting things up fresh, so that's a 
gotcha I've seen in fresh installs)

Travis

On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:

> Thanks Travis
> 
> I'm actually using the same image
> systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
> 
> I can confirm that there is something wrong with this image when its being
> used with xenserver 6.2
> 
> can't really think of anything else :(
> 
> Dean
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Travis Graham  wrote:
> 
>> Here are the correct links for 4.2.0:
>> 
>> Xenserver :
>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
>> KVM  :
>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
>> VMware   :
>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova
>> 
>> Travis
>> 
>> On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
>> 
>>> checking system vm logs /var/log/cloud.log, I see the following in the
>> logs
>>> 
>>> [SSVM] Unable to start agent: Resource class not found:
>> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource due to:
>> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource
>>> 
>>> storage is not mounted upon boot, even tho, I'm able to mount secondary
>> storage manually
>>> 
>>> I came across this issue
>>> 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1994
>>> 
>>> It has the extract symptoms I'm currently having
>>> 
>>> I'm unable to find download URL for new system vm.
>>> 
>>> Any ideas?
>>> 
>>> Thank you
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Dean Kamali 
>> wrote:
>>> I have switched to CentOS 6.4, thinking that might resolve the issue,
>> but I'm still having the same issue, I have followed the document provided
>> by Nitin and nothing stood out being out of the ordinary, yet, I can't
>> download any templates or ISO images, keep in mind this is a fresh install
>> of 4.2 and I'm  not upgrading off 4.1.1
>>> 
>>> I have noticed that Secondary storage vm agent doesn't show as up in the
>> UI, not sure if that's a normal behavior.
>>> 
>>> Please view the following image:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> If you have trouble seeing attached image it, click here
>>> 
>>> Thank you
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Shanker Balan <
>> shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>> On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:05 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
>>> 
 Hi Shanker
 
 Are you using Ubuntu or CentOS to run CS Management station?
 
 It is very strange that system vms boots up correctly and check scripts
 pass all tests.
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Am on CentOS 6.4
>>> 
>>> 
 Please let me know
 
 Thanks
 
 
 On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shanker Balan
 wrote:
 
> On 04-Oct-2013, at 8:09 PM, Dean Kamali 
>> wrote:
> 
>> Hello everyone
>> 
>> I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
>> my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting fine,
>> yet,
>> I'm not able to register any ISO or template.
> 
> Hi Dean,
> 
> My local xenserver 6.2 and CS 4.2.0 is working correctly. No issues
>> so far.
> 
> 
>> 
>> every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here is
> what
>> I see in the logs
>> 
>> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,409 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>> (Timer-11:null)
> Seq
>> 8-1364983880: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver:
>> v1,
>> Flags: 100011,
>> 
> 
>> [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","request":"GET_STATUS","hvm":true,"description":"centos5","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":53687091200,"id":208,"resourceType":"TEMPLATE","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","_store":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
>> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","_role":"Image"}},"url":"
>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2
>> 
> 
>> ","format":"VHD","accountId":2,"name":"208-2-208845e9-fb06-378f-aced-024455fb2bff","secUrl":"nfs://
>> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","wait":0}}] }
>> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,415 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>> (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) Seq 8-1364983880: Processing:  { Ans:
>> ,
>> MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
>> 
> 
>> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","downloadPct":0,"errorString":"
>> 
> 
>> ","downloadStatus":"NOT_DOWNLOADED","downloadPath":"/mnt/SecStorage/5d2b6999-a3ea-3953-839c-72e39cc520b4/template/tmpl/2/208/dnld4425529190918652935tmp_","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208

Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Dean Kamali]

Thanks Travis

I'm actually using the same image
systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2

I can confirm that there is something wrong with this image when its being
used with xenserver 6.2

can't really think of anything else :(

Dean




On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Travis Graham  wrote:

> Here are the correct links for 4.2.0:
>
> Xenserver :
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
> KVM  :
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
> VMware   :
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova
>
> Travis
>
> On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
>
> > checking system vm logs /var/log/cloud.log, I see the following in the
> logs
> >
> > [SSVM] Unable to start agent: Resource class not found:
> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource due to:
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource
> >
> > storage is not mounted upon boot, even tho, I'm able to mount secondary
> storage manually
> >
> > I came across this issue
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1994
> >
> > It has the extract symptoms I'm currently having
> >
> > I'm unable to find download URL for new system vm.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Dean Kamali 
> wrote:
> > I have switched to CentOS 6.4, thinking that might resolve the issue,
> but I'm still having the same issue, I have followed the document provided
> by Nitin and nothing stood out being out of the ordinary, yet, I can't
> download any templates or ISO images, keep in mind this is a fresh install
> of 4.2 and I'm  not upgrading off 4.1.1
> >
> > I have noticed that Secondary storage vm agent doesn't show as up in the
> UI, not sure if that's a normal behavior.
> >
> > Please view the following image:
> >
> >
> >
> > If you have trouble seeing attached image it, click here
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Shanker Balan <
> shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> > On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:05 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Shanker
> > >
> > > Are you using Ubuntu or CentOS to run CS Management station?
> > >
> > > It is very strange that system vms boots up correctly and check scripts
> > > pass all tests.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Am on CentOS 6.4
> >
> >
> > > Please let me know
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shanker Balan
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 04-Oct-2013, at 8:09 PM, Dean Kamali 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hello everyone
> > >>>
> > >>> I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
> > >>> my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting fine,
> yet,
> > >>> I'm not able to register any ISO or template.
> > >>
> > >> Hi Dean,
> > >>
> > >> My local xenserver 6.2 and CS 4.2.0 is working correctly. No issues
> so far.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here is
> > >> what
> > >>> I see in the logs
> > >>>
> > >>> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,409 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> (Timer-11:null)
> > >> Seq
> > >>> 8-1364983880: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver:
> v1,
> > >>> Flags: 100011,
> > >>>
> > >>
> [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","request":"GET_STATUS","hvm":true,"description":"centos5","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":53687091200,"id":208,"resourceType":"TEMPLATE","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","_store":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
> > >>> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","_role":"Image"}},"url":"
> > >>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2
> > >>>
> > >>
> ","format":"VHD","accountId":2,"name":"208-2-208845e9-fb06-378f-aced-024455fb2bff","secUrl":"nfs://
> > >>> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","wait":0}}] }
> > >>> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,415 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> > >>> (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) Seq 8-1364983880: Processing:  { Ans:
> ,
> > >>> MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
> > >>>
> > >>
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","downloadPct":0,"errorString":"
> > >>>
> > >>
> ","downloadStatus":"NOT_DOWNLOADED","downloadPath":"/mnt/SecStorage/5d2b6999-a3ea-3953-839c-72e39cc520b4/template/tmpl/2/208/dnld4425529190918652935tmp_","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","templateSize":0,"templatePhySicalSize":0,"result":true,"details":"
> > >>> ","wait":0}}] }
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I have run sysvmcheck script on ssvm and all checks passed without
> > >> showing
> > >>> any sign of warning or errors.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Can you share the output of ssvm-check.sh?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Please advise
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> @shankerbalan
> > >>
> > >> M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 679358

Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Travis Graham]

Here are the correct links for 4.2.0:

Xenserver : 
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
  
KVM  :
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
  
VMware   : http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova 

Travis

On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:

> checking system vm logs /var/log/cloud.log, I see the following in the logs 
> 
> [SSVM] Unable to start agent: Resource class not found: 
> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource due to: 
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: 
> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource
> 
> storage is not mounted upon boot, even tho, I'm able to mount secondary 
> storage manually
> 
> I came across this issue 
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1994 
> 
> It has the extract symptoms I'm currently having 
> 
> I'm unable to find download URL for new system vm.
> 
> Any ideas? 
> 
> Thank you
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
> I have switched to CentOS 6.4, thinking that might resolve the issue, but I'm 
> still having the same issue, I have followed the document provided by Nitin 
> and nothing stood out being out of the ordinary, yet, I can't download any 
> templates or ISO images, keep in mind this is a fresh install of 4.2 and I'm  
> not upgrading off 4.1.1 
> 
> I have noticed that Secondary storage vm agent doesn't show as up in the UI, 
> not sure if that's a normal behavior. 
> 
> Please view the following image:
> 
> 
> 
> If you have trouble seeing attached image it, click here 
> 
> Thank you
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Shanker Balan  
> wrote:
> On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:05 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
> 
> > Hi Shanker
> >
> > Are you using Ubuntu or CentOS to run CS Management station?
> >
> > It is very strange that system vms boots up correctly and check scripts
> > pass all tests.
> >
> 
> 
> Am on CentOS 6.4
> 
> 
> > Please let me know
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shanker Balan
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 04-Oct-2013, at 8:09 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello everyone
> >>>
> >>> I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
> >>> my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting fine, yet,
> >>> I'm not able to register any ISO or template.
> >>
> >> Hi Dean,
> >>
> >> My local xenserver 6.2 and CS 4.2.0 is working correctly. No issues so far.
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here is
> >> what
> >>> I see in the logs
> >>>
> >>> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,409 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Timer-11:null)
> >> Seq
> >>> 8-1364983880: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1,
> >>> Flags: 100011,
> >>>
> >> [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","request":"GET_STATUS","hvm":true,"description":"centos5","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":53687091200,"id":208,"resourceType":"TEMPLATE","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","_store":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
> >>> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","_role":"Image"}},"url":"
> >>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2
> >>>
> >> ","format":"VHD","accountId":2,"name":"208-2-208845e9-fb06-378f-aced-024455fb2bff","secUrl":"nfs://
> >>> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","wait":0}}] }
> >>> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,415 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> >>> (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) Seq 8-1364983880: Processing:  { Ans: ,
> >>> MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
> >>>
> >> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","downloadPct":0,"errorString":"
> >>>
> >> ","downloadStatus":"NOT_DOWNLOADED","downloadPath":"/mnt/SecStorage/5d2b6999-a3ea-3953-839c-72e39cc520b4/template/tmpl/2/208/dnld4425529190918652935tmp_","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","templateSize":0,"templatePhySicalSize":0,"result":true,"details":"
> >>> ","wait":0}}] }
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have run sysvmcheck script on ssvm and all checks passed without
> >> showing
> >>> any sign of warning or errors.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Can you share the output of ssvm-check.sh?
> >>
> >>
> >>> Please advise
> >>>
> >>> Thank you
> >>
> >> --
> >> @shankerbalan
> >>
> >> M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
> >> shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
> >> ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre,
> >> Bangalore - 560 055
> >>
> >> CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore
> >> http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> >> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> >> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not 

Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Dean Kamali]

checking system vm logs /var/log/cloud.log, I see the following in the logs

[SSVM] Unable to start agent: Resource class not found:
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource due to:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource

storage is not mounted upon boot, even tho, I'm able to mount secondary
storage manually

I came across this issue

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1994

It has the extract symptoms I'm currently having

I'm unable to find download URL for new system vm.

Any ideas?

Thank you



On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:

> I have switched to CentOS 6.4, thinking that might resolve the issue, but
> I'm still having the same issue, I have followed the document provided
> by Nitin and nothing stood out being out of the ordinary, yet, I can't
> download any templates or ISO images, keep in mind this is a fresh install
> of 4.2 and I'm  not upgrading off 4.1.1
>
> I have noticed that Secondary storage vm agent doesn't show as up in the
> UI, not sure if that's a normal behavior.
>
> Please view the following image:
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> If you have trouble seeing attached image it, click here 
> 
>
> Thank you
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Shanker Balan  > wrote:
>
>> On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:05 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Shanker
>> >
>> > Are you using Ubuntu or CentOS to run CS Management station?
>> >
>> > It is very strange that system vms boots up correctly and check scripts
>> > pass all tests.
>> >
>>
>>
>> Am on CentOS 6.4
>>
>>
>> > Please let me know
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shanker Balan
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 04-Oct-2013, at 8:09 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hello everyone
>> >>>
>> >>> I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
>> >>> my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting fine,
>> yet,
>> >>> I'm not able to register any ISO or template.
>> >>
>> >> Hi Dean,
>> >>
>> >> My local xenserver 6.2 and CS 4.2.0 is working correctly. No issues so
>> far.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here is
>> >> what
>> >>> I see in the logs
>> >>>
>> >>> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,409 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>> (Timer-11:null)
>> >> Seq
>> >>> 8-1364983880: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1,
>> >>> Flags: 100011,
>> >>>
>> >>
>> [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","request":"GET_STATUS","hvm":true,"description":"centos5","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":53687091200,"id":208,"resourceType":"TEMPLATE","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","_store":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
>> >>> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","_role":"Image"}},"url":"
>> >>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2
>> >>>
>> >>
>> ","format":"VHD","accountId":2,"name":"208-2-208845e9-fb06-378f-aced-024455fb2bff","secUrl":"nfs://
>> >>> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","wait":0}}] }
>> >>> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,415 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>> >>> (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) Seq 8-1364983880: Processing:  { Ans: ,
>> >>> MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
>> >>>
>> >>
>> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","downloadPct":0,"errorString":"
>> >>>
>> >>
>> ","downloadStatus":"NOT_DOWNLOADED","downloadPath":"/mnt/SecStorage/5d2b6999-a3ea-3953-839c-72e39cc520b4/template/tmpl/2/208/dnld4425529190918652935tmp_","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","templateSize":0,"templatePhySicalSize":0,"result":true,"details":"
>> >>> ","wait":0}}] }
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I have run sysvmcheck script on ssvm and all checks passed without
>> >> showing
>> >>> any sign of warning or errors.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Can you share the output of ssvm-check.sh?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Please advise
>> >>>
>> >>> Thank you
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> @shankerbalan
>> >>
>> >> M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
>> >> shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
>> >> ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade
>> Centre,
>> >> Bangalore - 560 055
>> >>
>> >> CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore
>> >> http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>> intended
>> >> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
>> views or
>> >> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
>> necessarily
>> >> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
>> the
>> >> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
>> based
>> >> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
>> sender

Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Dean Kamali]

I have switched to CentOS 6.4, thinking that might resolve the issue, but
I'm still having the same issue, I have followed the document provided
by Nitin and nothing stood out being out of the ordinary, yet, I can't
download any templates or ISO images, keep in mind this is a fresh install
of 4.2 and I'm  not upgrading off 4.1.1

I have noticed that Secondary storage vm agent doesn't show as up in the
UI, not sure if that's a normal behavior.

Please view the following image:

[image: Inline image 1]

If you have trouble seeing attached image it, click here


Thank you


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Shanker Balan
wrote:

> On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:05 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
>
> > Hi Shanker
> >
> > Are you using Ubuntu or CentOS to run CS Management station?
> >
> > It is very strange that system vms boots up correctly and check scripts
> > pass all tests.
> >
>
>
> Am on CentOS 6.4
>
>
> > Please let me know
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shanker Balan
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 04-Oct-2013, at 8:09 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello everyone
> >>>
> >>> I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
> >>> my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting fine,
> yet,
> >>> I'm not able to register any ISO or template.
> >>
> >> Hi Dean,
> >>
> >> My local xenserver 6.2 and CS 4.2.0 is working correctly. No issues so
> far.
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here is
> >> what
> >>> I see in the logs
> >>>
> >>> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,409 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Timer-11:null)
> >> Seq
> >>> 8-1364983880: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1,
> >>> Flags: 100011,
> >>>
> >>
> [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","request":"GET_STATUS","hvm":true,"description":"centos5","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":53687091200,"id":208,"resourceType":"TEMPLATE","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","_store":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
> >>> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","_role":"Image"}},"url":"
> >>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2
> >>>
> >>
> ","format":"VHD","accountId":2,"name":"208-2-208845e9-fb06-378f-aced-024455fb2bff","secUrl":"nfs://
> >>> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","wait":0}}] }
> >>> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,415 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> >>> (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) Seq 8-1364983880: Processing:  { Ans: ,
> >>> MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
> >>>
> >>
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","downloadPct":0,"errorString":"
> >>>
> >>
> ","downloadStatus":"NOT_DOWNLOADED","downloadPath":"/mnt/SecStorage/5d2b6999-a3ea-3953-839c-72e39cc520b4/template/tmpl/2/208/dnld4425529190918652935tmp_","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","templateSize":0,"templatePhySicalSize":0,"result":true,"details":"
> >>> ","wait":0}}] }
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have run sysvmcheck script on ssvm and all checks passed without
> >> showing
> >>> any sign of warning or errors.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Can you share the output of ssvm-check.sh?
> >>
> >>
> >>> Please advise
> >>>
> >>> Thank you
> >>
> >> --
> >> @shankerbalan
> >>
> >> M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
> >> shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
> >> ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade
> Centre,
> >> Bangalore - 560 055
> >>
> >> CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore
> >> http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended
> >> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
> or
> >> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> >> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
> the
> >> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> >> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
> sender
> >> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is
> a
> >> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP
> is a
> >> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
> Blue
> >> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil
> >> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
> >> registered trademark.
> >>
>
> --
> @shankerbalan
>
> M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
> shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
> ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre,
> Bangalore - 560 055
>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore
> http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
>
>
>
>
> This email and any att

Re: Disable copy snapshot to secondary storage in CS 4.2

[Sebastian Igerl]

no, it's still not working, did you have any luck jet?


2013/10/4 Andrei Mikhailovsky 

> Sebastian,
>
> Did you manage to solve this, or is this option not working properly? I am
> also on rbd and looking to disable secondary storage copy of the snapshots.
>
> Thanks
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Sebastian Igerl" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 30 September, 2013 12:01:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Disable copy snapshot to secondary storage in CS 4.2
>
> Hmm.. but it still does. maybe a bug ?
> snapshot.backup.rightafterbackup snapshot right after snapshot is
> takenfalse
>
>
> Primary storage is Ceph/RDB, Secondary is NFS. I restarted both the
> management server and the nodes.
>
> not really sure if this helps:
>
> management-server.log:2013-09-30 12:48:48,196 DEBUG
> [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-7:job-77 = [
> 379cc53b-1b43-4a6e-b080-3396daa08187 ]) Seq 1-1254424614: Sending { Cmd ,
> MgmtId: 148417590936615, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111,
>
> [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.SnapshotObjectTO":{"path":"vms/5065da10-4d2d-426a-a794-f02f29ca57ed/18ef0d32-1c56-4d5e-89df-9b5a0f5ef798","volume":{"uuid":"a84300b2-189f-4a55-9232-a048ae94f7fb","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"3e937dc8-0dfc-3bf4-8910-8a17aa6a3344","id":5,"poolType":"RBD","host":"10.30.40.2","path":"vms","port":6789}},"name":"ROOT-13","size":8589934592,"path":"5065da10-4d2d-426a-a794-f02f29ca57ed","volumeId":23,"vmName":"i-2-13-VM","accountId":2,"format":"RAW","id":23,"hypervisorType":"KVM"},"dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"3e937dc8-0dfc-3bf4-8910-8a17aa6a3344","id":5,"poolType":"RBD","host":"10.30.40.2","path":"vms","port":6789}},"vmName":"i-2-13-VM","name":"5b49e069-41ae-4acf-a042-5d8f43dbe665_ROOT-13_20130930104846","hypervisorType":"KVM","id":12}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.SnapshotObjectTO":{"path":"snapshots/2/23","volume":{"uuid":"a84300b2-189f-4a55-9232-a048ae94f7fb","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"3e937dc8-0dfc-3bf4-8910-8a17aa6a3344","id":5,"poolType":"RBD","host":"10.30.40.2","path":"vms","port":6789}},"name":"ROOT-13","size":8589934592,"path":"5065da10-4d2d-426a-a794-f02f29ca57ed","volumeId":23,"vmName":"i-2-13-VM","accountId":2,"format":"RAW","id":23,"hypervisorType":"KVM"},"dataStore":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
> 10.30.31.14/export/secondary
> ","_role":"Image"}},"vmName":"i-2-13-VM","name":"5b49e069-41ae-4acf-a042-5d8f43dbe665_ROOT-13_20130930104846","hypervisorType":"KVM","id":12}},"executeInSequence":true,"wait":21600}}]
> }
>
>
> --Sebastian
>
>
> 2013/9/30 Sanjay Tripathi 
>
> > That's correct.
> >
> > Setting up the mentioned global config parameter to false will not copy
> > the snapshot to secondary storage, snapshot will be available in primary
> > storage.
> >
> > --Sanjay
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Sebastian Igerl [mailto:igerls...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 4:08 PM
> > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Disable copy snapshot to secondary storage in CS 4.2
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > i'm trying to disable that a snapshots get copied to secondary storage
> > right
> > > after it's creation.
> > > I thought if i set "snapshot.backup.rightafter" to false this should
> > work ?
> > >
> > > Any thoughts ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Sebastian
> >
>
>

RE: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Steve Searles]

I was having a similar issue last night. I have been running 4.1 without issue 
with both Xen and Vmware.  I installed 4.2 in the lab to do some testing before 
a full upgrade.  Below are the issues I have found so far and the workarounds I 
found. I am using Ubuntu 12.04 for the MS and building the nonoss code from 
source. 

1. System VM's will not provison. (NFS FAILURE) apparently after building the 
deb packages and installing them the correct permissions are not being set on 
/var/lib/cloud and the nfs mounts are failing due to to permissions for the 
cloud user.  (chown -R cloud.cloud /var/lib/cloud). This has corrected the 
issue. 

--Log Snip--
2013-10-03 23:22:38,931 INFO  [storage.resource.VmwareStorageProcessor] 
(DirectAgent-72:esx02.lab.zimcom.net) Executing 
copyTemplateFromSecondaryToPrimary. secondaryStorage: 
nfs://nfs01.us.east.leb.lab.zimcom.net/US_EAST_Z1_SEC, 
templatePathAtSecondaryStorage: template/tmpl/1/8/, templateName: routing-8
2013-10-03 23:22:38,931 ERROR [vmware.manager.VmwareManagerImpl] 
(DirectAgent-72:esx02.lab.zimcom.net) Unable to create mount: 
/var/lib/cloud/mnt/VM/345049822399.60d4f8d1
2013-10-03 23:22:38,932 ERROR [vmware.manager.VmwareManagerImpl] 
(DirectAgent-72:esx02.lab.zimcom.net) Unable to create mount: 
/var/lib/cloud/mnt/VM/345049822399.fe168a8
2013-10-03 23:22:38,932 ERROR
--Log Snip--

2. System VM's will provision and pass connectivity tests but templates will 
never begin downloading from cloud.com.  To make a long story short I 
pre-populated my secondary storage with all of the system images for 
KVM,VmWare, Xen, and LXC. The problem seems to be an issue with the SSVM 
enumerating the value of the LXC template from the secondary storage and 
returning "Number Format Exception".  Below is a log I pulled from the SSVM 
running on vmware that caused the issue.  I removed the LXC template and the 
KVM template from the secondary storage and restarted the SSVM, the template 
download then succeeded. Below is a log snip from the SSVM that was causing the 
error.  Hope this helps. 

-- Log Snip-- 

2013-10-04 04:41:04,465 INFO  [storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl] 
(agentRequest-Handler-5:null) found 4 
templates[/mnt/SecStorage/4ebc642c-eb94-3a8a-81b8-d5971132beb3/template/tmpl/1/1/b3ac9ed6-cba1-41f3-
8965-f7c89f0772d8.vhd, 
/mnt/SecStorage/4ebc642c-eb94-3a8a-81b8-d5971132beb3/template/tmpl/1/8/79f0d6b5-22c8-4561-86d5-150260f4e2ce.ova,
 /mnt/SecStorage/4ebc642c-eb94-3a8a-81b8-d5971132beb3/template/tmpl/1/NU
LL/475e0e89-5bff-4e23-8f2c-ba9b56fc6472.qcow2, 
/mnt/SecStorage/4ebc642c-eb94-3a8a-81b8-d5971132beb3/template/tmpl/1/3/1220decc-ecdd-4794-8408-fc8836806f72.qcow2]
2013-10-04 04:41:04,477 WARN  [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) 
Caught: 
java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "NULL"
at 
java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:48)
at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:410)
at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:468)
at 
com.cloud.storage.template.TemplateLocation.getTemplateInfo(TemplateLocation.java:161)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl.gatherTemplateInfo(DownloadManagerImpl.java:840)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource.execute(NfsSecondaryStorageResource.java:1467)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource.executeRequest(NfsSecondaryStorageResource.java:194)
at 
com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource.defaultAction(PremiumSecondaryStorageResource.java:63)
at 
com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource.executeRequest(PremiumSecondaryStorageResource.java:59)
at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:525)
at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:852)
at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:83)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
2013-10-04 04:41:04,480 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) 
Seq 8-1237778437:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 345049822399, via: 8, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,

--Log Snip-- 


Steve Searles
Director, Network Operations
Zimcom Internet Solutions, Inc.
http://www.zimcom.net
Phone. (513)231-9500
Fax. (513)624-3909
Toll Free. (888)624-3910

-Original Message-
From: Shanker Balan [mailto:shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 1:20 PM
To: 
Subject: Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:05 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:

> Hi Shanker
>
> Are you using Ubuntu or CentOS to run CS Management station?
>
> It is very strange that system vms boots up correctly and check 
> scripts pass all tests.
>


Am on CentOS 6.4


> Please let me know
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, Oc

Virtualizing Cloudstack Manager onto XenServer host

[David Ortiz]

Hello,
 I am setting up a small test cluster and decided to use XenServer this 
time with Cloudstack 4.2.0.  I would like to run the management server on the 
cluster, but since XenServer uses its own OS install rather than CentOS, I 
believe that means I cannot run the manager on it bare metal like I would for 
KVM.  Is it possible for me to create the management server on a VM which I 
then would use to connect to the cluster for cloudstack functionality?
Thanks,  David Ortiz  

Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Shanker Balan]

On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:05 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:

> Hi Shanker
>
> Are you using Ubuntu or CentOS to run CS Management station?
>
> It is very strange that system vms boots up correctly and check scripts
> pass all tests.
>


Am on CentOS 6.4


> Please let me know
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shanker Balan
> wrote:
>
>> On 04-Oct-2013, at 8:09 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone
>>>
>>> I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
>>> my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting fine, yet,
>>> I'm not able to register any ISO or template.
>>
>> Hi Dean,
>>
>> My local xenserver 6.2 and CS 4.2.0 is working correctly. No issues so far.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here is
>> what
>>> I see in the logs
>>>
>>> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,409 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Timer-11:null)
>> Seq
>>> 8-1364983880: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1,
>>> Flags: 100011,
>>>
>> [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","request":"GET_STATUS","hvm":true,"description":"centos5","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":53687091200,"id":208,"resourceType":"TEMPLATE","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","_store":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
>>> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","_role":"Image"}},"url":"
>>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2
>>>
>> ","format":"VHD","accountId":2,"name":"208-2-208845e9-fb06-378f-aced-024455fb2bff","secUrl":"nfs://
>>> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","wait":0}}] }
>>> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,415 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>>> (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) Seq 8-1364983880: Processing:  { Ans: ,
>>> MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
>>>
>> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","downloadPct":0,"errorString":"
>>>
>> ","downloadStatus":"NOT_DOWNLOADED","downloadPath":"/mnt/SecStorage/5d2b6999-a3ea-3953-839c-72e39cc520b4/template/tmpl/2/208/dnld4425529190918652935tmp_","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","templateSize":0,"templatePhySicalSize":0,"result":true,"details":"
>>> ","wait":0}}] }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have run sysvmcheck script on ssvm and all checks passed without
>> showing
>>> any sign of warning or errors.
>>>
>>
>> Can you share the output of ssvm-check.sh?
>>
>>
>>> Please advise
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>
>> --
>> @shankerbalan
>>
>> M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
>> shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
>> ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre,
>> Bangalore - 560 055
>>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore
>> http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
>> registered trademark.
>>

--
@shankerbalan

M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, 
Bangalore - 560 055

CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore
http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/




This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Nitin Mehta]

Try step 3 @ 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Sec
ondary+storage+troubleshooting

On 04/10/13 9:35 AM, "Dean Kamali"  wrote:

>Hi Shanker
>
>Are you using Ubuntu or CentOS to run CS Management station?
>
>It is very strange that system vms boots up correctly and check scripts
>pass all tests.
>
>Please let me know
>
>Thanks
>
>
>On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shanker Balan
>wrote:
>
>> On 04-Oct-2013, at 8:09 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
>>
>> > Hello everyone
>> >
>> > I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
>> > my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting fine,
>>yet,
>> > I'm not able to register any ISO or template.
>>
>> Hi Dean,
>>
>> My local xenserver 6.2 and CS 4.2.0 is working correctly. No issues so
>>far.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here is
>> what
>> > I see in the logs
>> >
>> > 2013-10-04 10:22:41,409 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>>(Timer-11:null)
>> Seq
>> > 8-1364983880: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1,
>> > Flags: 100011,
>> >
>> 
>>[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand":{"jobId
>>":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","request":"GET_STATUS","hvm":tru
>>e,"description":"centos5","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":53687091200,"id":208,"
>>resourceType":"TEMPLATE","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","_store":{"c
>>om.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
>> > 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","_role":"Image"}},"url":"
>> > http://download.cloud.com/templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2
>> >
>> 
>>","format":"VHD","accountId":2,"name":"208-2-208845e9-fb06-378f-aced-0244
>>55fb2bff","secUrl":"nfs://
>> > 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","wait":0}}] }
>> > 2013-10-04 10:22:41,415 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>> > (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) Seq 8-1364983880: Processing:  { Ans: ,
>> > MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
>> >
>> 
>>[{"com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4e
>>e5-a995-af6f5307e996","downloadPct":0,"errorString":"
>> >
>> 
>>","downloadStatus":"NOT_DOWNLOADED","downloadPath":"/mnt/SecStorage/5d2b6
>>999-a3ea-3953-839c-72e39cc520b4/template/tmpl/2/208/dnld44255291909186529
>>35tmp_","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","templateSize":0,"templatePhy
>>SicalSize":0,"result":true,"details":"
>> > ","wait":0}}] }
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I have run sysvmcheck script on ssvm and all checks passed without
>> showing
>> > any sign of warning or errors.
>> >
>>
>> Can you share the output of ssvm-check.sh?
>>
>>
>> > Please advise
>> >
>> > Thank you
>>
>> --
>> @shankerbalan
>>
>> M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
>> shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
>> ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade
>>Centre,
>> Bangalore - 560 055
>>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore
>> http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>>intended
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
>>or
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
>>the
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
>>sender
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is
>>a
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP
>>is a
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
>>Blue
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
>>Brasil
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
>> registered trademark.
>>

Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Dean Kamali]

Hi Shanker

Are you using Ubuntu or CentOS to run CS Management station?

It is very strange that system vms boots up correctly and check scripts
pass all tests.

Please let me know

Thanks


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shanker Balan
wrote:

> On 04-Oct-2013, at 8:09 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone
> >
> > I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
> > my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting fine, yet,
> > I'm not able to register any ISO or template.
>
> Hi Dean,
>
> My local xenserver 6.2 and CS 4.2.0 is working correctly. No issues so far.
>
>
> >
> > every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here is
> what
> > I see in the logs
> >
> > 2013-10-04 10:22:41,409 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Timer-11:null)
> Seq
> > 8-1364983880: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1,
> > Flags: 100011,
> >
> [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","request":"GET_STATUS","hvm":true,"description":"centos5","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":53687091200,"id":208,"resourceType":"TEMPLATE","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","_store":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
> > 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","_role":"Image"}},"url":"
> > http://download.cloud.com/templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2
> >
> ","format":"VHD","accountId":2,"name":"208-2-208845e9-fb06-378f-aced-024455fb2bff","secUrl":"nfs://
> > 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","wait":0}}] }
> > 2013-10-04 10:22:41,415 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> > (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) Seq 8-1364983880: Processing:  { Ans: ,
> > MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
> >
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","downloadPct":0,"errorString":"
> >
> ","downloadStatus":"NOT_DOWNLOADED","downloadPath":"/mnt/SecStorage/5d2b6999-a3ea-3953-839c-72e39cc520b4/template/tmpl/2/208/dnld4425529190918652935tmp_","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","templateSize":0,"templatePhySicalSize":0,"result":true,"details":"
> > ","wait":0}}] }
> >
> >
> >
> > I have run sysvmcheck script on ssvm and all checks passed without
> showing
> > any sign of warning or errors.
> >
>
> Can you share the output of ssvm-check.sh?
>
>
> > Please advise
> >
> > Thank you
>
> --
> @shankerbalan
>
> M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
> shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
> ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre,
> Bangalore - 560 055
>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore
> http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
>
>
>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
> registered trademark.
>

Re: cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Shanker Balan]

On 04-Oct-2013, at 8:09 PM, Dean Kamali  wrote:

> Hello everyone
>
> I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
> my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting fine, yet,
> I'm not able to register any ISO or template.

Hi Dean,

My local xenserver 6.2 and CS 4.2.0 is working correctly. No issues so far.


>
> every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here is what
> I see in the logs
>
> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,409 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Timer-11:null) Seq
> 8-1364983880: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1,
> Flags: 100011,
> [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","request":"GET_STATUS","hvm":true,"description":"centos5","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":53687091200,"id":208,"resourceType":"TEMPLATE","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","_store":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","_role":"Image"}},"url":"
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2
> ","format":"VHD","accountId":2,"name":"208-2-208845e9-fb06-378f-aced-024455fb2bff","secUrl":"nfs://
> 172.16.16.10/data/vol2","wait":0}}] }
> 2013-10-04 10:22:41,415 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
> (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) Seq 8-1364983880: Processing:  { Ans: ,
> MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","downloadPct":0,"errorString":"
> ","downloadStatus":"NOT_DOWNLOADED","downloadPath":"/mnt/SecStorage/5d2b6999-a3ea-3953-839c-72e39cc520b4/template/tmpl/2/208/dnld4425529190918652935tmp_","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","templateSize":0,"templatePhySicalSize":0,"result":true,"details":"
> ","wait":0}}] }
>
>
>
> I have run sysvmcheck script on ssvm and all checks passed without showing
> any sign of warning or errors.
>

Can you share the output of ssvm-check.sh?


> Please advise
>
> Thank you

--
@shankerbalan

M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, 
Bangalore - 560 055

CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore
http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/




This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

cloudstack 4.2 xenserver 6.2 template not downloading

[Dean Kamali]

Hello everyone

I did a fresh install of CS 4.2, and I'm using xenserver 6.2 for
my hypervisors, I have added hosts, and system vms are booting fine, yet,
I'm not able to register any ISO or template.

every time I try and register, it doesn't show any progress , here is what
I see in the logs

2013-10-04 10:22:41,409 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Timer-11:null) Seq
8-1364983880: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1,
Flags: 100011,
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","request":"GET_STATUS","hvm":true,"description":"centos5","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":53687091200,"id":208,"resourceType":"TEMPLATE","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","_store":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
172.16.16.10/data/vol2","_role":"Image"}},"url":"
http://download.cloud.com/templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2
","format":"VHD","accountId":2,"name":"208-2-208845e9-fb06-378f-aced-024455fb2bff","secUrl":"nfs://
172.16.16.10/data/vol2","wait":0}}] }
2013-10-04 10:22:41,415 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-15:null) Seq 8-1364983880: Processing:  { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 2839826851498, via: 8, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer":{"jobId":"bc01b7a0-816c-4ee5-a995-af6f5307e996","downloadPct":0,"errorString":"
","downloadStatus":"NOT_DOWNLOADED","downloadPath":"/mnt/SecStorage/5d2b6999-a3ea-3953-839c-72e39cc520b4/template/tmpl/2/208/dnld4425529190918652935tmp_","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/208","templateSize":0,"templatePhySicalSize":0,"result":true,"details":"
","wait":0}}] }



I have run sysvmcheck script on ssvm and all checks passed without showing
any sign of warning or errors.

Please advise

Thank you

Re: Create Template on NFS secondary Storage

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

Hi Kirk and Travis,

Thanks for your fast answer and reply. The problem was the one Kirk
mention, NFFSSR.py have been replace by an hotfix,  we recently apply a
xenserver hotfix and since then  we had problem creating templates. Pretty
much in the same time we add a new zone so I wasn't sure which event cause
the issue which is why I did not say it in the first email.

doe anyone know if there is a doc reference of all scripts replace on
xenserver by cloudstack? if it is not the only script.

That said, the only doc I've found regarding updating hypervisors is
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Admin_Guide/maintain-hypervisors-on-hosts.html
which contain an outdated link.

Thanks again !



Pierre-Luc Dion
Responsable technique - infrastructure | Technical lead - infrastructure
514-447-3456, 1101
- - -*
CloudOps
*420 rue Guy
Montréal QC  H3J 1S6
www.cloudops.com
@CloudOps_


On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Kirk Kosinski wrote:

> Did you patch the hosts recently?  That is the likely cause.  The
> patched NFSSR.py that CloudStack copies to XS hosts can be overwritten
> by some patches.  Without the patched NFSSR.py, when secondary storage
> is mounted it reverts to the default XenServer behavior of including an
> extra directory named after the SR UUID.
>
> One solution is to copy the correct NFSSR.py manually from the
> management server to /opt/xensource/sm/NFSSR.py on every XS host.  There
> will be several versions of the script in
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/ on the
> management server, and you can check the MD5 checksums beforehand to
> confirm it is the problem.
>
> Another solution is to force CloudStack to setup the host again, which
> includes copying NFSSR.py.  To do this, unmanage the cluster in
> Cloudstack, clear the "tags" parameter for every host in the cluster (xe
> host-list, xe host-param-clear uuid= param-name=tags), re-manage
> the cluster, and wait a few minutes.
>
> Best regards,
> Kirk
>
> On 10/03/2013 12:51 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are currently using Cloudstack 4.1.0 managing XenServer 6.0.2 servers.
> >
> >
> > Since recently, I don't know what cause this to appear on our system but
> >  went we create a template from a Instance the template (.vhd) is upload
> on
> > on the secondary storage (NFS) but in a subdirectory  ex:
> >
> > from the Storage VM:
> > /mnt/SecStorage/7f6f1f2d-2d6f-3ec6-a25e-fb25f2704167/template/tmpl/3/246
> > root@s-184-VM:~# ls -l
> > total 8
> > drwxr-xr-x 2 4294967294 4294967294 4096 Oct  3 19:35
> > 02ee28f2-0c02-f936-3ca3-099cfe3f3a20
> > -rw-rw-rw- 1 4294967294 4294967294  314 Oct  3 19:36 template.properties
> >
> > root@s-184-VM:~# ls 02ee28f2-0c02-f936-3ca3-099cfe3f3a20/
> > fe2fa941-3030-412d-8c35-b0e80a2e7e09.vhd
> >
> >
> > So, when we create a new Instance from the template, the Instance
> creation
> > fail with the following error in the management-server.log:
> >
> > 2013-10-03 15:48:01,190 WARN  [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
> > (DirectAgent-255:null) Catch Exception
> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException on
> > host:9a02ac57-bc92-43af-b50a-f5ba2d0fd806 for template: nfs://
> >
> 172.24.1.120/data/secondary/template/tmpl/3/246/fe2fa941-3030-412d-8c35-b0e80a2e7e09.vhddue
> > to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi
> > in sr 451078ee-d335-bdb0-c41c-cd86524be3ea
> >
> > if I move the VHD file in the 246 folder, it works !
> >
> > Does anyone have this problem too  or have an idea of where it would come
> > from ?
> >
> > Thanks !
> >
> >
> > Pierre-Luc Dion
> > Responsable technique - infrastructure | Technical lead - infrastructure
> > - - -*
> > CloudOps
> > *www.cloudops.com
> > @CloudOps_
> >
>

Re: How to hide some server offerings?

[Daan Hoogland]

Rafael,

You can add a jira ticket and/or write a functional spec on the wiki. Of
course if you want guarantee that it will be doen, you'll have to do it
yourself. You can ask on the dev list for help if you don't feel up to it.

regards,
Daan


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I strongly agree, it is something very interesting and pretty simple to
> code.
> Where can I go to suggest it ?
>
>
> 2013/10/4 benoit lair 
>
> > It would be interesting to propose this feature for the new version of
> > cloudstack, why not for the cs 4.3 ?
> >
> > Regards, Benoit.
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/4 Alena Prokharchyk 
> >
> > > Rafael, there is no way to filter offerings by the caller type, not
> even
> > > in the DB.
> > >
> > > "Public" attribute means that the offering is available to everyone in
> > the
> > > cloud; there is another alternative - offering can be domain specific.
> In
> > > this case it can be used by all users from this domain/its subdomains.
> > >
> > > As a workaround, you can set the name for the offerings you want to be
> > > visible to admin, with some prefix. And filter out those offerings when
> > > return the result to the regular user - but for that some custom
> > > modifications need to be done in the CS UI.
> > >
> > > -Alena.
> > >
> > > On 10/3/13 3:31 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >Hey all,
> > > >
> > > >I was wondering, I have some server offering that should just be used
> by
> > > >the administrator, so, is it possible to hide them from normal users?
> > > >
> > > >I noticed that when I am creating a service offering there is a
> > check-box
> > > >called public? So, I created some service offering that would be used
> > just
> > > >for by the administrator, but they are appearing for all users (I did
> > not
> > > >check that checkbox).
> > > >
> > > >I also tried to check and uncheck the check-box(by the way it seems
> > there
> > > >is a javascript problem on that page) and then selecting a domain like
> > > >root, but still the offerings are appearing to everybody.
> > > >
> > > >Is it the expected behavior?
> > > >Do you happen to know if I can change any flag on the database and
> hide
> > > >them from normal users?
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Rafael Weingartner
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingartner
>

Re: How to hide some server offerings?

[France]

Then use my previous suggestion. To write it again, step by step 
tutorial style.


For users:
1. Create a new domain uder ROOT, let's say Public.
2. Create users in this Public domain.
3. Create service offerings specific/tied to Public domain.

For admins:
1. Create a new domain under ROOT, let's say Private.
2. Create service offerings specific/tied to Private domain.

Service offerings from Private and Public domain will be available to 
Administrators and service offerings from and only from Public domain 
will be available to users in Public domain.


I could also write using CAPS LOCK as you did, but i don't think it 
would help you understand any better.


Good luck and Regards,
F.

On 4/10/13 3:06 PM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:

No man,
let's go slowly:
I have user administrator that should manage the infrastructure and 
some VMs that are vital for our cloud, point.
These VMs use service offerings that provide much more resources, so 
they should not be used by normal users, and that's why we would like 
to hide them.


So, THE ADMINISTRATORS CAN AND SHOULD USE THESE SPECIAL SERVICE 
OFFERINGS, but the rest of the cloud SHOULD NOT.





2013/10/4 France mailto:mailingli...@isg.si>>

So you want to have a user(s), that can create new infrastructure
(compute, storage nodes, networks) but it's not able to create
service offerings on them? I guess no one envisioned such a need.
Normally if one can manage infrastructure on which services will
reside, it should be able to create service offerings too.

For what you're trying to to (if i understand you right), i would
have set up different, discrete CS installs.



On 4/10/13 2:45 PM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:

But, If I move them to a domain they would not be able to manage
the infrastructure. right?


2013/10/4 France mailto:mailingli...@isg.si>>

Move those "administrators" to their own domains as normal users.
Administrators will always be able to see/configure
everything, that's the basic point of being administrator.


On 4/10/13 2:40 PM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:

I know the concept of inheritance.

The problem here as I said is that I have administrator
users that manage the whole infrastructure, they are linked
directly to the root domain.

Saying that, how would create the service offering that
should just be visible to the administrators? Keep in mind
that they are on the root domain.


2013/10/4 France mailto:mailingli...@isg.si>>

It's called inheritance.
I put my public users to public domain.
I put my private users to their private domain(s).
And then I put specific service offerings to specific
domains and are visible only there.
I guess if i wanted something cross domains i would put
it to domain root (like you) and everyone (because it's
under domain root) would be able to use it.



On 4/10/13 2:11 PM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:


I tried this, I created some service offering on domain
root, but they are visible to user on root\...\...

Even though I unmarked the public check box.

I tried to create without specifying domain, but it
also not working.



2013/10/4 France mailto:mailingli...@isg.si>>

Create domains and domain specific service offerings.
It can be done, i know because we are doing in
since v 3.*


On 4/10/13 12:31 AM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:

Hey all,

I was wondering, I have some server offering
that should just be used by
the administrator, so, is it possible to hide
them from normal users?

I noticed that when I am creating a service
offering there is a check-box
called public? So, I created some service
offering that would be used just
for by the administrator, but they are
appearing for all users (I did not
check that checkbox).

I also tried to check and uncheck the
check-box(by the way it seems there
is a javascript problem on that page) and then
selecting a domain like
root, but still the offerings are appearing to
everybody.

Is it the expected behavior?
Do you happen to know if I can change any flag
on the database and hide
them from normal users?





-- 
Rafael Weingartner





-- 
Rafael Weingartner





-- 
Rafael Weingartner





--
Rafael Weingartner

Re: Problem when booting vm CS 4.2

[Koen Vanoppen]

A portition from the log file. I destroyed the system vm's also, because
the agent state stayed on disconnnected...

2013-10-04 15:03:22,124 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-14:null) ===START===  10.206.3.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9&response=json&sessionkey=zO9LsmrwSKr048Gqk3VEx%2Bw%2FZXM%3D&_=1380891806602
2013-10-04 15:03:22,136 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-14:null) Async job-42 = [
29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9 ] completed
2013-10-04 15:03:22,142 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-14:null) ===END===  10.206.3.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9&response=json&sessionkey=zO9LsmrwSKr048Gqk3VEx%2Bw%2FZXM%3D&_=1380891806602
2013-10-04 15:03:22,508 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager
Timer:null) Resetting hosts suitable for reconnect
2013-10-04 15:03:22,510 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager
Timer:null) Completed resetting hosts suitable for reconnect
2013-10-04 15:03:22,510 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager
Timer:null) Acquiring hosts for clusters already owned by this management
server
2013-10-04 15:03:22,511 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager
Timer:null) Completed acquiring hosts for clusters already owned by this
management server
2013-10-04 15:03:22,511 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager
Timer:null) Acquiring hosts for clusters not owned by any management server
2013-10-04 15:03:22,512 DEBUG [host.dao.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager
Timer:null) Completed acquiring hosts for clusters not owned by any
management server
^C
[root@energia ~]# tail -f
/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log
2013-10-04 15:03:49,155 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-7:null) Async job-42 = [
29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9 ] completed
2013-10-04 15:03:49,160 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-7:null)
===END===  10.206.3.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9&response=json&sessionkey=zO9LsmrwSKr048Gqk3VEx%2Bw%2FZXM%3D&_=1380891833609
2013-10-04 15:03:52,130 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-9:null)
===START===  10.206.3.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9&response=json&sessionkey=zO9LsmrwSKr048Gqk3VEx%2Bw%2FZXM%3D&_=1380891836609
2013-10-04 15:03:52,142 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-9:null) Async job-42 = [
29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9 ] completed
2013-10-04 15:03:52,148 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-9:null)
===END===  10.206.3.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9&response=json&sessionkey=zO9LsmrwSKr048Gqk3VEx%2Bw%2FZXM%3D&_=1380891836609
2013-10-04 15:03:53,421 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-3:null) Ping from 3
2013-10-04 15:03:53,455 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-4:null) Ping from 1
2013-10-04 15:03:54,115 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector]
(StatsCollector-1:null) StorageCollector is running...
2013-10-04 15:03:54,119 INFO  [storage.endpoint.DefaultEndPointSelector]
(StatsCollector-1:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent
to LocalHostEndPoint
2013-10-04 15:03:54,432 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(StatsCollector-1:null) Seq 1-118423733: Received:  { Ans: , MgmtId:
345052353870, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetStorageStatsAnswer } }
2013-10-04 15:03:55,131 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-19:null) ===START===  10.206.3.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9&response=json&sessionkey=zO9LsmrwSKr048Gqk3VEx%2Bw%2FZXM%3D&_=1380891839610
2013-10-04 15:03:55,143 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-19:null) Async job-42 = [
29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9 ] completed
2013-10-04 15:03:55,149 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-19:null) ===END===  10.206.3.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9&response=json&sessionkey=zO9LsmrwSKr048Gqk3VEx%2Bw%2FZXM%3D&_=1380891839610
2013-10-04 15:03:58,131 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-15:null) ===START===  10.206.3.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9&response=json&sessionkey=zO9LsmrwSKr048Gqk3VEx%2Bw%2FZXM%3D&_=1380891842611
2013-10-04 15:03:58,143 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-15:null) Async job-42 = [
29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9 ] completed
2013-10-04 15:03:58,149 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-15:null) ===END===  10.206.3.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobId=29b6068a-64f8-4cd4-9185-259627d612e9&response=json&sessionkey=zO9LsmrwSKr048Gqk3VEx%2Bw%2FZXM%3D&_=1380891842611
2013-10-04 15:04:01,131 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-17:null) ===START===  10.206.3.143 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResult&jobI

Re: How to hide some server offerings?

[France]

So you want to have a user(s), that can create new infrastructure 
(compute, storage nodes, networks) but it's not able to create service 
offerings on them? I guess no one envisioned such a need. Normally if 
one can manage infrastructure on which services will reside, it should 
be able to create service offerings too.


For what you're trying to to (if i understand you right), i would have 
set up different, discrete CS installs.



On 4/10/13 2:45 PM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:
But, If I move them to a domain they would not be able to manage the 
infrastructure. right?



2013/10/4 France mailto:mailingli...@isg.si>>

Move those "administrators" to their own domains as normal users.
Administrators will always be able to see/configure everything,
that's the basic point of being administrator.


On 4/10/13 2:40 PM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:

I know the concept of inheritance.

The problem here as I said is that I have administrator users
that manage the whole infrastructure, they are linked directly to
the root domain.

Saying that, how would create the service offering that should
just be visible to the administrators? Keep in mind that they are
on the root domain.


2013/10/4 France mailto:mailingli...@isg.si>>

It's called inheritance.
I put my public users to public domain.
I put my private users to their private domain(s).
And then I put specific service offerings to specific domains
and are visible only there.
I guess if i wanted something cross domains i would put it to
domain root (like you) and everyone (because it's under
domain root) would be able to use it.



On 4/10/13 2:11 PM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:


I tried this, I created some service offering on domain
root, but they are visible to user on root\...\...

Even though I unmarked the public check box.

I tried to create without specifying domain, but it also not
working.



2013/10/4 France mailto:mailingli...@isg.si>>

Create domains and domain specific service offerings.
It can be done, i know because we are doing in since v 3.*


On 4/10/13 12:31 AM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:

Hey all,

I was wondering, I have some server offering that
should just be used by
the administrator, so, is it possible to hide them
from normal users?

I noticed that when I am creating a service offering
there is a check-box
called public? So, I created some service offering
that would be used just
for by the administrator, but they are appearing for
all users (I did not
check that checkbox).

I also tried to check and uncheck the check-box(by
the way it seems there
is a javascript problem on that page) and then
selecting a domain like
root, but still the offerings are appearing to
everybody.

Is it the expected behavior?
Do you happen to know if I can change any flag on
the database and hide
them from normal users?





-- 
Rafael Weingartner





-- 
Rafael Weingartner





--
Rafael Weingartner

Re: How to hide some server offerings?

[France]

Move those "administrators" to their own domains as normal users.
Administrators will always be able to see/configure everything, that's 
the basic point of being administrator.


On 4/10/13 2:40 PM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:

I know the concept of inheritance.

The problem here as I said is that I have administrator users that 
manage the whole infrastructure, they are linked directly to the root 
domain.


Saying that, how would create the service offering that should just be 
visible to the administrators? Keep in mind that they are on the root 
domain.



2013/10/4 France mailto:mailingli...@isg.si>>

It's called inheritance.
I put my public users to public domain.
I put my private users to their private domain(s).
And then I put specific service offerings to specific domains and
are visible only there.
I guess if i wanted something cross domains i would put it to
domain root (like you) and everyone (because it's under domain
root) would be able to use it.



On 4/10/13 2:11 PM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:


I tried this, I created some service offering on domain root, but
they are visible to user on root\...\...

Even though I unmarked the public check box.

I tried to create without specifying domain, but it also not working.



2013/10/4 France mailto:mailingli...@isg.si>>

Create domains and domain specific service offerings.
It can be done, i know because we are doing in since v 3.*


On 4/10/13 12:31 AM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:

Hey all,

I was wondering, I have some server offering that should
just be used by
the administrator, so, is it possible to hide them from
normal users?

I noticed that when I am creating a service offering
there is a check-box
called public? So, I created some service offering that
would be used just
for by the administrator, but they are appearing for all
users (I did not
check that checkbox).

I also tried to check and uncheck the check-box(by the
way it seems there
is a javascript problem on that page) and then selecting
a domain like
root, but still the offerings are appearing to everybody.

Is it the expected behavior?
Do you happen to know if I can change any flag on the
database and hide
them from normal users?





-- 
Rafael Weingartner





--
Rafael Weingartner

Re: How to hide some server offerings?

[France]

It's called inheritance.
I put my public users to public domain.
I put my private users to their private domain(s).
And then I put specific service offerings to specific domains and are 
visible only there.
I guess if i wanted something cross domains i would put it to domain 
root (like you) and everyone (because it's under domain root) would be 
able to use it.



On 4/10/13 2:11 PM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:


I tried this, I created some service offering on domain root, but they 
are visible to user on root\...\...


Even though I unmarked the public check box.

I tried to create without specifying domain, but it also not working.



2013/10/4 France mailto:mailingli...@isg.si>>

Create domains and domain specific service offerings.
It can be done, i know because we are doing in since v 3.*


On 4/10/13 12:31 AM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:

Hey all,

I was wondering, I have some server offering that should just
be used by
the administrator, so, is it possible to hide them from normal
users?

I noticed that when I am creating a service offering there is
a check-box
called public? So, I created some service offering that would
be used just
for by the administrator, but they are appearing for all users
(I did not
check that checkbox).

I also tried to check and uncheck the check-box(by the way it
seems there
is a javascript problem on that page) and then selecting a
domain like
root, but still the offerings are appearing to everybody.

Is it the expected behavior?
Do you happen to know if I can change any flag on the database
and hide
them from normal users?





--
Rafael Weingartner

Problem when booting vm CS 4.2

[Koen Vanoppen]

Hi all,

I recently upgraded my CS from 4.1.1 to 4.2.
Now I have the following problem when creatin a new instance from my
templates.
When cloudstack starts to boot the instance I get the following error:
Unable to start instance due to InvocationTargetException when invoking RPC
callback for command: createVolumeFromBaseImageCallBack.

The template works fine (I did the upgrade in our test environment but used
the same templates).
I only added a shared network in the new cloudstack 4.2.

Kind regards,

Koen

Re: ssvm not taking ip from cloudstack

[David Nalley]

Why are you running competing DHCP servers on networks that CloudStack
supposes are its networks?

There are ways around this, essentially configure your non-CloudStack
DHCP instance to ignore any of the MACs range handed out by
CloudStack.

--David

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:11 AM,   wrote:
> Hi all.
> I have installed cloudstack 4.1.1 and connected with esxi 4.1 
> through vcenter.  After that ssvm and console proxy vm started.but these 
> system vms are not taking ip from cloudstack, its getting ip from esxi.
>
> In cloudstack ui it has a different ip.  Its trying to connect to the system 
> vm through that ip and fails. Kindly help me .
>
> Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
>
> The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
> this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
> contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not 
> the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this 
> e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this 
> message and any attachments.
>
> WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should 
> check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company 
> accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this 
> email.
>
> www.wipro.com

ssvm not taking ip from cloudstack

[jagadeeshwaran.k33]

Hi all.
I have installed cloudstack 4.1.1 and connected with esxi 4.1 
through vcenter.  After that ssvm and console proxy vm started.but these system 
vms are not taking ip from cloudstack, its getting ip from esxi.

In cloudstack ui it has a different ip.  Its trying to connect to the system vm 
through that ip and fails. Kindly help me .

Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments.

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should 
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company 
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this 
email.

www.wipro.com

Re: How to hide some server offerings?

[France]

Create domains and domain specific service offerings.
It can be done, i know because we are doing in since v 3.*

On 4/10/13 12:31 AM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:

Hey all,

I was wondering, I have some server offering that should just be used by
the administrator, so, is it possible to hide them from normal users?

I noticed that when I am creating a service offering there is a check-box
called public? So, I created some service offering that would be used just
for by the administrator, but they are appearing for all users (I did not
check that checkbox).

I also tried to check and uncheck the check-box(by the way it seems there
is a javascript problem on that page) and then selecting a domain like
root, but still the offerings are appearing to everybody.

Is it the expected behavior?
Do you happen to know if I can change any flag on the database and hide
them from normal users?

Re: How to hide some server offerings?

[Rafael Weingartner]

I strongly agree, it is something very interesting and pretty simple to
code.
Where can I go to suggest it ?


2013/10/4 benoit lair 

> It would be interesting to propose this feature for the new version of
> cloudstack, why not for the cs 4.3 ?
>
> Regards, Benoit.
>
>
> 2013/10/4 Alena Prokharchyk 
>
> > Rafael, there is no way to filter offerings by the caller type, not even
> > in the DB.
> >
> > "Public" attribute means that the offering is available to everyone in
> the
> > cloud; there is another alternative - offering can be domain specific. In
> > this case it can be used by all users from this domain/its subdomains.
> >
> > As a workaround, you can set the name for the offerings you want to be
> > visible to admin, with some prefix. And filter out those offerings when
> > return the result to the regular user - but for that some custom
> > modifications need to be done in the CS UI.
> >
> > -Alena.
> >
> > On 10/3/13 3:31 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" 
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Hey all,
> > >
> > >I was wondering, I have some server offering that should just be used by
> > >the administrator, so, is it possible to hide them from normal users?
> > >
> > >I noticed that when I am creating a service offering there is a
> check-box
> > >called public? So, I created some service offering that would be used
> just
> > >for by the administrator, but they are appearing for all users (I did
> not
> > >check that checkbox).
> > >
> > >I also tried to check and uncheck the check-box(by the way it seems
> there
> > >is a javascript problem on that page) and then selecting a domain like
> > >root, but still the offerings are appearing to everybody.
> > >
> > >Is it the expected behavior?
> > >Do you happen to know if I can change any flag on the database and hide
> > >them from normal users?
> > >
> > >--
> > >Rafael Weingartner
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
Rafael Weingartner

Re: Disable copy snapshot to secondary storage in CS 4.2

[Andrei Mikhailovsky]

Sebastian, 

Did you manage to solve this, or is this option not working properly? I am also 
on rbd and looking to disable secondary storage copy of the snapshots. 

Thanks 
- Original Message -

From: "Sebastian Igerl"  
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Sent: Monday, 30 September, 2013 12:01:21 PM 
Subject: Re: Disable copy snapshot to secondary storage in CS 4.2 

Hmm.. but it still does. maybe a bug ? 
snapshot.backup.rightafterbackup snapshot right after snapshot is takenfalse 


Primary storage is Ceph/RDB, Secondary is NFS. I restarted both the 
management server and the nodes. 

not really sure if this helps: 

management-server.log:2013-09-30 12:48:48,196 DEBUG 
[agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-7:job-77 = [ 
379cc53b-1b43-4a6e-b080-3396daa08187 ]) Seq 1-1254424614: Sending { Cmd , 
MgmtId: 148417590936615, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, 
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.SnapshotObjectTO":{"path":"vms/5065da10-4d2d-426a-a794-f02f29ca57ed/18ef0d32-1c56-4d5e-89df-9b5a0f5ef798","volume":{"uuid":"a84300b2-189f-4a55-9232-a048ae94f7fb","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"3e937dc8-0dfc-3bf4-8910-8a17aa6a3344","id":5,"poolType":"RBD","host":"10.30.40.2","path":"vms","port":6789}},"name":"ROOT-13","size":8589934592,"path":"5065da10-4d2d-426a-a794-f02f29ca57ed","volumeId":23,"vmName":"i-2-13-VM","accountId":2,"format":"RAW","id":23,"hypervisorType":"KVM"},"dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"3e937dc8-0dfc-3bf4-8910-8a17aa6a3344","id":5,"poolType":"RBD","host":"10.30.40.2","path":"vms","port":6789}},"vmName":"i-2-13-VM","name":"5b49e069-41ae-4acf-a042-5d8f43dbe665_ROOT-13_20130930104846","hypervisorType":"KVM","id":12}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.SnapshotObjectTO":{"path":"snapshots/2/23","volume":{"uuid":"a84300b2-189f-4a55-9232-a048ae94f7fb","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"3e937dc8-0dfc-3bf4-8910-8a17aa6a3344","id":5,"poolType":"RBD","host":"10.30.40.2","path":"vms","port":6789}},"name":"ROOT-13","size":8589934592,"path":"5065da10-4d2d-426a-a794-f02f29ca57ed","volumeId":23,"vmName":"i-2-13-VM","accountId":2,"format":"RAW","id":23,"hypervisorType":"KVM"},"dataStore":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://
 
10.30.31.14/export/secondary","_role":"Image"}},"vmName":"i-2-13-VM","name":"5b49e069-41ae-4acf-a042-5d8f43dbe665_ROOT-13_20130930104846","hypervisorType":"KVM","id":12}},"executeInSequence":true,"wait":21600}}]
 
} 


--Sebastian 


2013/9/30 Sanjay Tripathi  

> That's correct. 
> 
> Setting up the mentioned global config parameter to false will not copy 
> the snapshot to secondary storage, snapshot will be available in primary 
> storage. 
> 
> --Sanjay 
> 
> > -Original Message- 
> > From: Sebastian Igerl [mailto:igerls...@gmail.com] 
> > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 4:08 PM 
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> > Subject: Disable copy snapshot to secondary storage in CS 4.2 
> > 
> > Hi All, 
> > 
> > i'm trying to disable that a snapshots get copied to secondary storage 
> right 
> > after it's creation. 
> > I thought if i set "snapshot.backup.rightafter" to false this should 
> work ? 
> > 
> > Any thoughts ? 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks 
> > 
> > Sebastian 
> 

Zone wide Primary Storage after upgrade to CS 4.2

[Andrei Mikhailovsky]

Hello guys, 

Before upgrading to CS 4.2 I would like to check the behaviour of Primary 
Storage which are currently bound to a particular cluster. How would this work 
with the support of the zone wide primary storage? Would all my primary 
storages be automatically converted to a zone wide primary storage, or is this 
something that I need to do manually? If I have to convert the primary storage 
manually, what is the correct procedure? Would it cause the downtime? 

Many thanks 

Andrei 

Re: How to hide some server offerings?

[benoit lair]

It would be interesting to propose this feature for the new version of
cloudstack, why not for the cs 4.3 ?

Regards, Benoit.


2013/10/4 Alena Prokharchyk 

> Rafael, there is no way to filter offerings by the caller type, not even
> in the DB.
>
> "Public" attribute means that the offering is available to everyone in the
> cloud; there is another alternative - offering can be domain specific. In
> this case it can be used by all users from this domain/its subdomains.
>
> As a workaround, you can set the name for the offerings you want to be
> visible to admin, with some prefix. And filter out those offerings when
> return the result to the regular user - but for that some custom
> modifications need to be done in the CS UI.
>
> -Alena.
>
> On 10/3/13 3:31 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" 
> wrote:
>
> >Hey all,
> >
> >I was wondering, I have some server offering that should just be used by
> >the administrator, so, is it possible to hide them from normal users?
> >
> >I noticed that when I am creating a service offering there is a check-box
> >called public? So, I created some service offering that would be used just
> >for by the administrator, but they are appearing for all users (I did not
> >check that checkbox).
> >
> >I also tried to check and uncheck the check-box(by the way it seems there
> >is a javascript problem on that page) and then selecting a domain like
> >root, but still the offerings are appearing to everybody.
> >
> >Is it the expected behavior?
> >Do you happen to know if I can change any flag on the database and hide
> >them from normal users?
> >
> >--
> >Rafael Weingartner
> >
>
>
>

Re: Offer HA on Compute Offering?

[Koushik Das]

"Offer HA" in compute offering is for compute HA. If a VM is created with a 
compute HA offering (HA enabled VM) then in the event of host failure it will 
be migrated to another host. HA is NOT enabled by default. 

-Koushik

On 04-Oct-2013, at 2:01 PM, Indra Pramana  wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> Anyone knows what is the meaning of "Offer HA" function when we create a
> new compute offering? Is it referring to the compute HA (e.g. VM instance
> will be auto-failover to another hypervisor host if the existing host is
> down) or storage HA (auto-failover to another primary storage)?
> 
> I thought compute / hypervisor host HA is already enabled by default for
> all the VM instances?
> 
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> 
> Cheers.

Re: Offer HA on Compute Offering?

[Vihar]

Hi Indra,

Offer HA is nothing but it will monitor the system VM's and if set to yes
then it will be highly available as possible
You can set the same when you create a new compute offerings.

*Regards*
*Vihar K*
*
*


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Indra Pramana  wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Anyone knows what is the meaning of "Offer HA" function when we create a
> new compute offering? Is it referring to the compute HA (e.g. VM instance
> will be auto-failover to another hypervisor host if the existing host is
> down) or storage HA (auto-failover to another primary storage)?
>
> I thought compute / hypervisor host HA is already enabled by default for
> all the VM instances?
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>

Offer HA on Compute Offering?

[Indra Pramana]

Dear all,

Anyone knows what is the meaning of "Offer HA" function when we create a
new compute offering? Is it referring to the compute HA (e.g. VM instance
will be auto-failover to another hypervisor host if the existing host is
down) or storage HA (auto-failover to another primary storage)?

I thought compute / hypervisor host HA is already enabled by default for
all the VM instances?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.

[SOLVED] Re: Slow network speed to VM instances after upgrade to CloudStack 4.2.0

[Indra Pramana]

Hi Kirk,

Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.

Yes, I have confirmed that the compute offering is causing this. The
network rate on the compute offering for all the VMs were set to 2
Mbit/sec. For some reason, the network rate was not enforced when I was
still using CloudStack 4.1.1 and earlier, but now being enforced on
CloudStack 4.2.0.

Thank you for your detailed information on compute offering. I have tested
by creating a new compute offering with higher network rate (100 Mbit/sec),
shutdown the instance, change service offering to the new compute offering,
and start back the instance. I am able to get much higher bandwidth during
my speedtest now.

Thank you.


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Kirk Kosinski wrote:

> Hi, your observations on Compute Offerings are by design.  They can only
> be created and managed by admin accounts, and only the name and
> description can be edited.  They can be public or domain-specific, but a
> root admin account should be able to view all of them.
>
> Instead of editing existing offerings to set the desired network
> throttling, new ones need to be created (using an admin account) and the
> VMs updated.  VMs will need to be stopped, and it can be done by a root
> admin or the user that owns the VMs.  The change can be made via UI or
> API (changeServiceForVirtualMachine command).
>
> But are you sure the Compute Offering is causing this?  Is the Network
> Rate on the Compute Offering for the affected VMs set to 2 Mbit/sec?
> What hypervisor are the affected VMs running on, and what type of
> network (isolated or shared)? The actual network throttling seen by VMs
> is complicated and depends on a combination of factors including:
>
> 1) Network type (isolate or shared)
> 2) Hypervisor of the guest
> 3) Hypervisor of the virtual router (for isolated networks)
> 4) NIC driver of virtual router (for vSphere)
> 5) Network Offering for the network
> 6) Compute Offering for the instance
> 7) System Service Offering for the virtual router (isolated networks)
> 8) Direction of traffic (ingress or egress)
> 9) The vm.network.throttling.rate global parameter
> 10) The network.throttling.rate zone parameter
> 11) Actual physical capabilities of the network and hosts
>
> Best regards,
> Kirk
>
> On 10/03/2013 08:26 PM, Indra Pramana wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > After CloudStack upgrade to 4.2.0, the network speed to our VM instances
> is
> > very slow and seems to be limited to 2 Mbps for both ingress and egress
> > traffic for each instance. It seems that there's some network rate
> limiting
> > which didn't take effect on CloudStack version 4.1.1 or below, but now is
> > taking effect on CloudStack 4.2.0.
> >
> > I read this article on how CloudStack manages the network traffic for the
> > VMs:
> >
> >
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Admin_Guide/network-rate.html
> >
> > For guest VMs, the network rate-limiting is set on the compute offering
> > associate with each VM. Please CMIIW.
> >
> > All our guest VMs are created under different accounts and have their own
> > compute offering, which is auto-created under that specific account when
> > the VM instance is created.
> >
> > The issue is, from admin account, I can't seem to modify the compute
> > offering for the guest VMs. If I go to GUI > Service Offerings > Compute
> > Offering, I can only see the compute offering for admin account only. How
> > can I see and modify the compute offering under different accounts?
> >
> > Furthermore, it seems that I cannot modify the network rate field of an
> > existing compute offering. How do I modify it so that I can set higher
> > network rate limit or unlimited bandwidth for an existing guest VM?
> >
> > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
>

Re: Network offering for GRE

[Nguyen Anh Tu]

2013/10/4 Luca Salvatore 

> For it to be proper layer 2 over layer 3 the VMs in each zone would need
> to be on the same subnet.  That way they can ARP for a VM in a different
> zone and traffic would use the GRE tunnel.
>

Ah... yes, sure.

-- 

N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U

Re: Resize data-disk doesn't work after upgrade

[Indra Pramana]

Hi Marcus and Kirk,

Good day to you, and thank you for your email replies.

We are using Ceph RBD primary storage. I can't find any error information
on agent.log, and I have set the logging to verbose (DEBUG) for all.

Since I am using RBD, am I still able to run the qemu-img info command?

I check the volumes table contain load of information. How do I check which
record is referring to the virtual disk in question?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Kirk Kosinski wrote:

> Yes, if there was a problem it should have been logged in the agent.log.
>  If it was successful it may or may not be logged depending on the
> logging level.  While logged on to the hypervisor, check the actual
> virtual disk with "qemu-img info /mnt/somepath/filename".  The filename
> can be found in the CloudStack database (the "path" field for the
> virtual disk in the volumes table).
>
> Best regards,
> Kirk
>
> On 10/03/2013 03:47 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> > What primary storage are you using? Any errors in agent log?
> > On Oct 3, 2013 3:16 PM, "Indra Pramana"  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Marcus,
> >>
> >> Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail.
> >>
> >> I have tried restarting the VM and even stop and start the VM, but after
> >> logging in to the VM, I still see the hard drive's size as 20 GB
> instead of
> >> 60 GB.
> >>
> >> I tried to check /var/log/libvirt/libvirtd.log file on the KVM host
> where
> >> the VM is hosted, and can't find any messages related to volBlockResize.
> >>
> >> Any other troubleshooting steps you can recommend, i.e. any other area I
> >> can look into?
> >>
> >> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >>
> >> Cheers.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Marcus Sorensen 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I just tested local storage qcow2 and CLVM resize on 4.2, they both
> >> worked.
> >>>
> >>> Resize works like this:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Do sanity checks
> >>> 2. Send resize command to the agent
> >>> 3. Resize the disk/lun/file
> >>> 4. Inform the VM instance that the disk has changed by making a
> >>> libvirt volBlockResize call (this is not fatal, some guest types can't
> >>> resize online and need to be restarted)
> >>> 5. Update the database
> >>>
> >>> You can check #3 looking at the disks themselves on storage to see if
> >>> they've grown. You can check #4 by restarting the VM to see if it
> >>> picks up the change.
> >>>
> >>> It may be that libvirt was unable to inform the VM of the change (for
> >>> example if you haven't upgraded to a supported version of Ubuntu or
> >>> CentOS and it has an old libvirt that doesn't support volBlockResize).
> >>>  The way to know for sure is stop/start the VM if you can.
> >>>
> >>> Look at those two things and let us know
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Indra Pramana  wrote:
>  Dear all,
> 
>  After upgrading to 4.2.0, I tried to resize a data disk of a VM
> >> instance
>  from 20 GB to 60 GB, through the Cloudstack GUI. The UI reports that
> >> the
>  resize was successful, and that the data disk is now showing 60 GB
> >>> instead
>  of 20 GB. However, when I check the actual disk on the VM, it seems
> >> that
>  it's still 20 GB.
> 
>  Any reason what might have been the cause of the problem? I even tried
> >> to
>  re-partition it to see if the size changed, but it wasn't and still at
> >> 20
>  GB. Which logs I need to look into?
> 
>  Any help on this is greatly appreciated.
> 
>  Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> 
>  Cheers.
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

Re: Slow network speed to VM instances after upgrade to CloudStack 4.2.0

[Kirk Kosinski]

Hi, your observations on Compute Offerings are by design.  They can only
be created and managed by admin accounts, and only the name and
description can be edited.  They can be public or domain-specific, but a
root admin account should be able to view all of them.

Instead of editing existing offerings to set the desired network
throttling, new ones need to be created (using an admin account) and the
VMs updated.  VMs will need to be stopped, and it can be done by a root
admin or the user that owns the VMs.  The change can be made via UI or
API (changeServiceForVirtualMachine command).

But are you sure the Compute Offering is causing this?  Is the Network
Rate on the Compute Offering for the affected VMs set to 2 Mbit/sec?
What hypervisor are the affected VMs running on, and what type of
network (isolated or shared)? The actual network throttling seen by VMs
is complicated and depends on a combination of factors including:

1) Network type (isolate or shared)
2) Hypervisor of the guest
3) Hypervisor of the virtual router (for isolated networks)
4) NIC driver of virtual router (for vSphere)
5) Network Offering for the network
6) Compute Offering for the instance
7) System Service Offering for the virtual router (isolated networks)
8) Direction of traffic (ingress or egress)
9) The vm.network.throttling.rate global parameter
10) The network.throttling.rate zone parameter
11) Actual physical capabilities of the network and hosts

Best regards,
Kirk

On 10/03/2013 08:26 PM, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> After CloudStack upgrade to 4.2.0, the network speed to our VM instances is
> very slow and seems to be limited to 2 Mbps for both ingress and egress
> traffic for each instance. It seems that there's some network rate limiting
> which didn't take effect on CloudStack version 4.1.1 or below, but now is
> taking effect on CloudStack 4.2.0.
> 
> I read this article on how CloudStack manages the network traffic for the
> VMs:
> 
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Admin_Guide/network-rate.html
> 
> For guest VMs, the network rate-limiting is set on the compute offering
> associate with each VM. Please CMIIW.
> 
> All our guest VMs are created under different accounts and have their own
> compute offering, which is auto-created under that specific account when
> the VM instance is created.
> 
> The issue is, from admin account, I can't seem to modify the compute
> offering for the guest VMs. If I go to GUI > Service Offerings > Compute
> Offering, I can only see the compute offering for admin account only. How
> can I see and modify the compute offering under different accounts?
> 
> Furthermore, it seems that I cannot modify the network rate field of an
> existing compute offering. How do I modify it so that I can set higher
> network rate limit or unlimited bandwidth for an existing guest VM?
> 
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> 
> Cheers.
>