Re: Using Kannel in a ISP environment
Aarno Syvänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there any way of easily making Kannel less strict? Obviously we > > want to try and reduce the number of calls to our helpdesk as much as > > possible. > > > > What kind of WML pages cause problems? Perhaps it is indeed possible to > add compability flags, though Lars used to have strong opinions about this > subject. > I've found a few where they use unquoted "&"s in the source, instead of "&". Stuff like that mostly... I realise that this is illegal WML of course, but the more I can do to help our helpdesk bobs the better really... Scott -- sjr systems and software engineer demon internet, thus plc
Can the Kannel Gateway operate as a standalone SMSC?
Hi, I would like to know whether the Kannel Gateway can act as a stand alone SMSC? My understanding of the documentation is that the Gateway can communicate with SMSCs using a variety of SMPP protocols, that it can communicate with a Fake SMSC or it can use a phone as an SMSC - however all these interactions seem to be via the Wap Gateway. What I am looking for is to install a stand alone SMSC which talks SMPP out the front and to a GSM mobile to send the SMS messages out the back i.e SMPP AT Commands GSM SMS application --> SMSC --> GSM Mobile ---> GSM Mobile Can someone clarify whether the Gateway can operate in this mode. Many thanks, David Freer.
Re: Using Kannel in a ISP environment
Scott James Remnant wrote: > Hi there, > > We're a fairly large ISP in the UK and are considering replacing our > existing WAP gateway (currently running on Nokia's NAMP) with a Kannel > gateway. > > Just wanted to know whether there's any "gotcha"s that we might trip over > or any issues that we may come across that people are currently aware of. > > I've got it working on a Solaris 8 box, and have had only a few problems > so far (most of which seem to be more problems with the upstream WML > page). > > Is there any way of easily making Kannel less strict? Obviously we want > to try and reduce the number of calls to our helpdesk as much as possible. > > Scott > -- > sjr systems and software engineer > demon internet, thus plc What kind of WML pages cause problems? Perhaps it is indeed possible to add compability flags, though Lars used to have strong opinions about this subject. Aarno
RE: EMI_IP message values vs. Operator
Thanks for your answer.I do use the latest stable version of Kannel (1.0.3-1) and I did try to install/compile the 1.1.5 development version, however, ./configure complains that my libxml is too old. [root@s1 gateway-1.1.5] rpm -q libxml gives libxml-1.8.10-1[root@s1 gateway-1.1.5] rpm -q libxml2 gives libxml2-2.4.5-1 I can't seem to find a libxml (1) in a much newer version than 1.8.10 so I wonder if it really means libxml2 and in that case what can I do to make it run ./configure?Is there a binary release af development Kannel? Even rpm maybe? Regards,Thomas "Gildas PERROT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>18-09-2001 10:29 ZE2 To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: bcc: Subject: RE: EMI_IP message values vs. Operator If you want some help, you should specify which version of Kannel you use,the configuration contents and the URL used.I can also suggest you to read EMI specification(http://www.cmgtele.com/docs/SMSC_EMI_specification_3.5.pdf) in order tounderstand each EMI fields and try the last stable Kannel version with emi2driver which is better than emi_ip for many reasons. It is even in goodshape with development or CVS versions.> -Message d'origine-> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé : lundi 17 septembre 2001 13:32> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Objet : EMI_IP message values vs. Operator I trying to get Kannel to cooperate with my SMS operator. My> problems begin> when I try to send a message:>> 2001-09-14 08:37:20 [3] DEBUG: emi 1 message> 00/00078/0/51/28145457/1919/01003//466F6F626172///> //E5> 2001-09-14 08:37:35 [3] INFO: emi_submit _smsmessage: wait for ack failed!> 2001-09-14 08:37:25 [3] DEBUG: Submit Error...>> After mailing this to my SMS operator I'm told that the message should be> like this:>> 00/00074/O/51/28145215/2020/3//466F6F626172/20>> What is the reason for these differences and what do I do to fix it?> Is it possible to force the values in the messages somehow?>> -- Thomas>>>
RE: UCP
Did you try the emi2 driver of the development option ? It is better than emi_ip driver and I am sure, that one use UCP-60 paquets for authentification before sending UCP-51 paquets for sending SMS. If you want some help, you should specify which version of Kannel you use, the configuration contents and the action done. I can also suggest you to read EMI specification (http://www.cmgtele.com/docs/SMSC_EMI_specification_3.5.pdf). > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Tim Hammonds > Envoyé : lundi 17 septembre 2001 17:35 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : UCP > > > I am doing some evaluation of Kannel and have successfully set it > up to send > messages to a SMPP SMSC. > > As yet I have not succeded in sending messages to a UCP SMSC and > the contact > at the SMSC company says this is because the message they receive is a > UCP-51 message, when it should be a UCP-60 message. > > I thought/hoped that all such matters regarding the UCP protocol would be > handled and hidden by Kannel. Or is the problem with that I am > trying to get > Kannel to connect to an incompatible SMSC. > > Incedently, the Kannel config (host,port,user and password) is > okay as the > message is arriving at the SMSC but being returned with the > following error > message: > > 00/00065/R/51/N/04/ Message not accepted, waiting for password/F6 > > Any help will be gratefully received, > > Tim. > > >
RE: EMI_IP message values vs. Operator
If you want some help, you should specify which version of Kannel you use, the configuration contents and the URL used. I can also suggest you to read EMI specification (http://www.cmgtele.com/docs/SMSC_EMI_specification_3.5.pdf) in order to understand each EMI fields and try the last stable Kannel version with emi2 driver which is better than emi_ip for many reasons. It is even in good shape with development or CVS versions. > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : lundi 17 septembre 2001 13:32 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : EMI_IP message values vs. Operator > > > > I trying to get Kannel to cooperate with my SMS operator. My > problems begin > when I try to send a message: > > 2001-09-14 08:37:20 [3] DEBUG: emi 1 message > 00/00078/0/51/28145457/1919/01003//466F6F626172/// > //E5 > 2001-09-14 08:37:35 [3] INFO: emi_submit _smsmessage: wait for ack failed! > 2001-09-14 08:37:25 [3] DEBUG: Submit Error... > > After mailing this to my SMS operator I'm told that the message should be > like this: > > 00/00074/O/51/28145215/2020/3//466F6F626172/20 > > What is the reason for these differences and what do I do to fix it? > Is it possible to force the values in the messages somehow? > > -- Thomas > > >
Using a Siemens T20 as SMS-C
Hi! I have started using the Kannel together with a Siemens T20 as an SMS-C. I have been able to get it working so that I can send and receive messages on my Siemens T-20 using it as a mobile phone. I have not been able to use it as the SMS Service Center in the way that I send messages from another mobile with the number of the Siemens T-20 as the Service Center (and another number in the "to" address). Is this not supposed to work? Any ideas why I have a problem with this? Could this be a limitation of my operator? Does anybody know of an operator that does allow me to specify another sender address than my own when sending a message through a SMS Service Center? Best regards :-) HAGAR
getting FAILED Send SMS
Hello Fellow Kannel Users, I recently compiled Kannel 1.1.5 on FreeBSD4.1, compilation seems to go smoothly, a test on fake SMSC work also. But when i install a virtual SMSC (nokia 6210) then try sending the message to Kannel, the reply is not consistent, sometimes messages get back to the sender, oftentimes it did not. Heres a sniffet of the error im getting ; 2001-09-18 13:58:50 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:nokia] [from:639198790532] [to:639178368079] [msg:mokong]2001-09-18 16:32:35 Receive SMS [SMSC:nokia] [from:639178368079] [to:1234] [msg:NOP]2001-09-18 16:32:35 SMS request sender:639178368079 request: 'NOP' fixed answer: 'You asked nothing and I did it!'2001-09-18 16:32:35 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:nokia] [from:639198790532] [to:639178368079] [msg:You asked nothing and I did it!]2001-09-18 16:33:37 send-SMS request added - sender:tester:639198790532 192.168.88.132 target: 639178368079 request: 'testing the sms server'2001-09-18 16:33:38 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:nokia] [from:639198790532] [to:639178368079] [msg:testing the sms server]2001-09-18 16:33:52 send-SMS request added - sender:tester:639198790532 192.168.88.132 target: 639178368079 request: 'testing the sms server'2001-09-18 16:33:56 send-SMS request added - sender:tester:639198790532 192.168.88.132 target: 639178368079 request: 'testing the sms server'2001-09-18 16:34:12 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:nokia] [from:639198790532] [to:639178368079] [msg:testing the sms server]2001-09-18 16:34:35 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:nokia] [from:639198790532] [to:639178368079] [msg:testing the sms server] Even if i successfully received the reply from kannel, im still getting this error. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Anthony
getting FAILED Send SMS
Hello Fellow Kannel Users, I recently compiled Kannel 1.1.5 on FreeBSD4.1, compilation seems to go smoothly, a test on fake SMSC work also. But when i install a virtual SMSC (nokia 6210) then try sending the message to Kannel, the reply is not consistent, sometimes messages get back to the sender, oftentimes it did not. Heres a sniffet of the error im getting ; 2001-09-18 13:58:50 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:nokia] [from:639198790532] [to:639178368079] [msg:mokong]2001-09-18 16:32:35 Receive SMS [SMSC:nokia] [from:639178368079] [to:1234] [msg:NOP]2001-09-18 16:32:35 SMS request sender:639178368079 request: 'NOP' fixed answer: 'You asked nothing and I did it!'2001-09-18 16:32:35 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:nokia] [from:639198790532] [to:639178368079] [msg:You asked nothing and I did it!]2001-09-18 16:33:37 send-SMS request added - sender:tester:639198790532 192.168.88.132 target: 639178368079 request: 'testing the sms server'2001-09-18 16:33:38 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:nokia] [from:639198790532] [to:639178368079] [msg:testing the sms server]2001-09-18 16:33:52 send-SMS request added - sender:tester:639198790532 192.168.88.132 target: 639178368079 request: 'testing the sms server'2001-09-18 16:33:56 send-SMS request added - sender:tester:639198790532 192.168.88.132 target: 639178368079 request: 'testing the sms server'2001-09-18 16:34:12 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:nokia] [from:639198790532] [to:639178368079] [msg:testing the sms server]2001-09-18 16:34:35 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:nokia] [from:639198790532] [to:639178368079] [msg:testing the sms server] Even if i successfully received the reply from kannel, im still getting this error. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Anthony
