from:"Moran Goldboim"

[ovirt-users] Re: Obtain dynamic inventory onto local machine using ovirt4.py for self-hosted engine

2018-05-23 Thread Moran Goldboim

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:10 PM, 03CE 007 <03ce...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Ondra,
> you're correct, there was much accept removing 'connection: local' line
> from ovirt ansible roles.
>
> however, the example playbook to deploy new vm fails at template option
> and it complains that i don't have rhel7 template. Doesn't this come
> bundled with hosted-engine and is available after deployment?
>
> Do i need to create/install new template?
>

sounds like indeed you are missing this template in your system.
take a look at
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-ansible-image-template/blob/master/README.md
for automatically creating a template from a web srource.


>
>
>
> On 23 May 2018 at 06:50, Ondra Machacek  wrote:
>
>> On 05/22/2018 06:44 PM, 03ce...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> I have successfully deployed self-hosted-engine (4.2) on centos (7.4)
>>> server.
>>>
>>> the server address is ovirt where the self-hosted engine running on it
>>> has fdqn as engine.ovirt. I  have ovirt,ini configured on server acan run
>>> the ovirt4.py from the server to obtain the vms in groups. But I want to
>>> control the vms using ansible from my macbook and run ansible playbooks
>>> locally.
>>>
>>> so I have downloaded the ovirt.ini and ovirt4.py from server and tried
>>> running it, but had no success.
>>>
>>> Is there something special needs setting up for
>>> 'self-hosted-ovirt-engine' as oppose to vanilla ovirt-engine which will
>>> allow me to control vms from my macbook?
>>>
>>
>> You don't need to do anything special.
>> What's the error you get?
>>
>>
>>
>>> thanks.
>>> ___
>>> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
>>>
>>>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
>
>
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org

Re: [ovirt-users] Tunable parameters in ovirt engine

2018-03-07 Thread Moran Goldboim

Hi Hari,

any specific use-case you are trying to achieve with this benchmark?
what are you trying to simulate? just wondering whether there are different
options to achieve it..

Thanks.

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Juan Hernández  wrote:

> It means that with the default configuration the Apache web server can't
> serve more than 256 concurrent connections. This applies to any application
> that uses Apache as the web frontend, not just to oVirt. If you want to
> change that you have to change the MaxRequestWorkers and ServerLimit
> parameters, as explained here:
>
>   https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mpm_common.html#maxrequestworkers
>
> So, go to your oVirt engine machine and create a /etc/httpd/conf.d/my.conf
> file with this content:
>
>   MaxRequestWorkers 1000
>   ServerLimit 1000
>
> Then restart the Apache server:
>
>   # systemctl restart httpd
>
> Then your web server should be able to handle 1000 concurrent requests,
> and you will probably start to find other limits, like the amount of memory
> and CPU that those 1000 Apache child processes will consume, the number of
> threads in the JBoss application server, the number of connections to the
> database, etc.
>
> Let me insist a bit that if you base your benchmark solely on the number
> of concurrent requests or connections that the server can handle you may
> end up with meaningless results, as a real world application can/should use
> the server much better than that.
>
> On 03/07/2018 04:33 PM, Hari Prasanth Loganathan wrote:
>
>> With the default configuration of the web server it is impossible to
>> handle
>> more than 256 *connections* simultaneously. I guess that "ab" is opening a
>> connection for each concurrent request, so when you reach request 257 the
>> web server will just reject the connection, there is nothing that the
>> JBoss
>> can do about it; you have to increase the number of connections supported
>> by the web server.
>>
>> *So Does it mean that oVirt cannot serve more than 257 request? *
>>
>> My question is, If its possible How to scale this and what is the
>> configuration we need to change?
>>
>> Also, we are taking a benchmark in using oVirt, So I need to find the
>> maximum possible oVirt request. So please let me know the configuration
>> tuning for oVirt to achieve maximum concurrent request.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hari
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Juan Hernández 
>> wrote:
>>
>> With the default configuration of the web server it is impossible to
>>> handle more than 256 *connections* simultaneously. I guess that "ab" is
>>> opening a connection for each concurrent request, so when you reach
>>> request
>>> 257 the web server will just reject the connection, there is nothing that
>>> the JBoss can do about it; you have to increase the number of connections
>>> supported by the web server.
>>>
>>> Or else you may want to re-consider why you want to use 1000 simultaneous
>>> connections. It may be OK for a performance test, but there are better
>>> ways
>>> to squeeze performance. For example, you could consider using HTTP
>>> pipelining, which is much more friendly for the server than so many
>>> connections. This is what we use when we need to send a large number of
>>> requests from other systems. There are examples of how to do that with
>>> the
>>> Python and Ruby SDKs here:
>>>
>>>Python:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine-sdk/blob/master/sdk/
>>> examples/asynchronous_inventory.py
>>>
>>>Ruby:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine-sdk-ruby/blob/master/
>>> sdk/examples/asynchronous_inventory.rb
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/07/2018 02:43 PM, Hari Prasanth Loganathan wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Juan,

 Thanks for the response.

 I agree web server can handle only limited number of concurrent
 requests.
 But Why it is failing with SSL handshake failure for few requests, Can't
 the JBOSS wait and serve the request? We can spare the delay but not
 with
 the request fails. So Is there a configuration in oVirt which can be
 tuned
 to achieve this?

 Thanks,
 Hari

 On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:05 PM, Juan Hernández 
 wrote:

 The first thing you will need to change for such a test is the number of

> simultaneous connections accepted by the Apache web server: by default
> the
> max is 256. See the Apache documentation here:
>
> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mpm_common.html#m
> axrequestworkers
>
> In addition I also suggest that you consider using the "worker"
> multi-processing module instead of the "prefork", as it usually works
> better when talking to a Java application server, because it re-uses
> connections better.
>
> On 03/07/2018 02:20 PM, Hari Prasanth Loganathan wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
>>
>> *Description of problem:*
>>
>> I am trying to achieve 1000

Re: [ovirt-users] virt-v2v converting multi-disk

2016-02-29 Thread Moran Goldboim

+Richard, v2v maintainer.

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Clint Boggio  wrote:

> I'm in the process of migrating a series of VM's from  KVM environment, to
> an OVirt environment. I've used virt-v2v to convert quite a few M$ and
> Linux machines with great success.
>
> Coming up I've got to convert a Linux VM that has 3 virtual disks. Inside
> that VM, the three disks are part of an LVM volume.
>
> 1. How will virt-v2v handle these three virtual disks ?
> 2. On which disk image will I run virt-v2v ?
> 3. Will virt-v2v "follow" the three images and convert the machine or will
> I have to somehow tell it to include all three disks ?
> 4. Shall I have all three images together in the same directory when I run
> the tool ?
> 5. Is this the appropriate forum for this question ?
>
> As of the writing of this question I'll be using OVirt 3.6 updated on a 4
> node cluster running CentOS 7 , and the most recent version of virt-v2v as
> is available on Fedora 23.
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 on Ubuntu? [oVirt Dockerized]

2015-04-13 Thread Moran Goldboim

Hi Mario,

Glad to hear you're interested in the project.
please see inline reply.

- Original Message -
From: Mario Giammarco mgiamma...@gmail.com
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Saturday, 11 April, 2015 8:57:52 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 on Ubuntu? [oVirt Dockerized]

Moran Goldboim mgoldboi@... writes:

Deploying oVirt engine has never been so easy.
Hi,
I have seen the project and it is interesting a lot.
Please note that next version of synology NAS OS will have docker support,
so I can buy a nas and use it also as ovirt-engine.

can you explain a bit more on the architecture you would like to present?

But I am learning docker and I see that it is not so easy to setup.
Infact a custom version of ovirt-engine must be developer for it.

The project isn't build in such a way you need to be a developer to run it
(though few manual steps needs to be taken ATM)
on a linux machine:
1. git clone
https://github.com/mgoldboi/oVirt-Dockerized.githttps://github.com/mgoldboi/oVirt-Dockerized.git
2. cd oVirt-Dockerized/Build
3. sudo make ovirt

this procedure will build latest oVirt version container and a database
container initialize with oVirt scheme.

So I see that you have made a 3.5.0 engine for docker but:

- will you provide 3.5.1? It seems to me I cannot upgrade it easily

Since i haven't seen so much interest from the community around this area,
I haven't generated new images for 3.5.1 (only for the clean rpm image).

regarding upgrades, since this basically a POC for ovirt in a container,
upgrade isn't supported yet.
which means you have 2 options ATM:
-upgrade from within the container[1]
-swap the oVirt container (3.5.0 - 3.5.1) and stay with the same DB (you may
need to upgrade the scheme manually, save/restore certificates) [2][3]

- if I install a standard ovirt-engine or a dockerized engine now, can I
migrate configuration to another one?

same procedure as above.
let me know if you have more questions.

Moran.

Thanks in advance for help,
Mario

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[1]http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.5_Release_Notes#Install_.2F_Upgrade_from_Previous_Versions
[2]http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt-database-upgrade-procedure
[3]http://www.ovirt.org/Backup_And_Restore_Engine
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 on Ubuntu? [oVirt Dockerized]

2014-11-03 Thread Moran Goldboim

Deploying oVirt engine has never been so easy.
Checkout oVirt dockerized projects on docker hub[1] and github[2].
You can find some overview on oVirt-dockerized blog[3]
Please let me know if you find it useful.

Cheers,
Moran. 

[1] https://hub.docker.com/u/mgoldboi/
[2] https://github.com/mgoldboi/oVirt-Dockerized
[3] http://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/10/ovirt-dockerized/
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] [ATN] oVirt 3.3 release, moving to RC [3.3 branching, blockers review]

2013-07-30 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 07/30/2013 09:56 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:

On 07/30/2013 06:05 PM, Moran Goldboim wrote:

We would like to go a head on oVirt 3.3 release process and issue an RC


how can we do this before folks review all the bugs with target 
release of 3.3 and either suggest them as blockers or move them from 3.3?
there are currently 59 NEW, 7 ASSIGNED and 22 POST with target release 
of 3.3?


http://alturl.com/aq23x


that the aim of this mail, maintainers should review their realm for 
blockers (unscrubbed bugs as well), and this release should get into 
stabilization mode.
by tomorrow we should have a better view on what are the blockers for 
the version, we are already going to delay this release, and i would 
like to get a clear view by tomorrow, as mentioned later in the mail - 
RC should go out without any known blockers.






for tomorrow meeting:

Maintainers/ Package owners
==
-branch your git repo (master) with 3.3 branch (making master ready 
for 3.4)

-for tomorrow meeting, overview [1], see if you have any changes to it
-if you don't have any blockers under your component, please branch 3.3
with RC1 branch

 |
 -master
 |
 -engine_3.3
 |
 -RC1
 |
 -engine_3.2
 ...

Users

with your experience from test day and with nightlies, if you feel there
are additional candidates to block this version for please add it to the
tracker bug [1].

Suggested Schedule

Wed Jul 31st - review of blockers for the version and component 
readiness

Mon Aug 5th - RC1 release
Wed Aug 7th - Release readiness review (in case of blockers an RC2 will
be issued)

Thanks.

[1]*Bug 918494* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918494
-Tracker: oVirt 3.3 release




___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users





___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] [ANN] oVirt 3.3 Test Day - Tomorrow Wed - Jul 24th

2013-07-24 Thread Moran Goldboim

Short update - rpms for ovirt-engine, are not up in the repo yet - and 
being copied ATM.

we'll send a short update when it's there - should be in beta repo [1]

[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/beta/rpm/


 Original Message 
Subject:Fwd: [Users] [ANN] oVirt 3.3 Test Day - Tomorrow Wed - Jul 24th
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:23:35 +0300
From:   Moran Goldboim mgold...@redhat.com
To: engine-devel engine-de...@ovirt.org, vdsm-de...@ovirt.org



Feature owners, please make sure:

-your feature is updated on release table page [1].
-you have test page for your feature [2].
-your team regression testing section is organized and up to date [3].

Thanks.

[1] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_release-management#Features_Status_Table
[2] 
http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_TestDay#oVirt_3.3_New_Features_-_Test_Status_Table

[3] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_TestDay#Regression_testing


 Original Message 
Subject:[Users] [ANN] oVirt 3.3 Test Day - Tomorrow Wed - Jul 24th
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:00:23 +0300
From:   Moran Goldboim mgold...@redhat.com
CC: users@ovirt.org users@ovirt.org



oVirt 3.3 release is just around the corner, and we would like to invite 
you all to take a taste of the new release [1].


http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_TestDay

Tomorrow morning (when all repos are packages are ready - finger 
crossed) you are invited to:


-checkout Test Day page [2]
-choose a distro (el6/fc19)
-install oVirt [3]
-check out the version
-report what you find

Developers and Users will be available in the channel/ on list to 
support in case there is trouble


Thanks


[1] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_release-management
[2] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_TestDay
[3]http://www.ovirt.org/Download





___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] [ANN] oVirt 3.3 Test Day - Tomorrow Wed - Jul 24th

2013-07-24 Thread Moran Goldboim


Beta RPMs are available on the repo for FC19 and EL6.

On 07/24/2013 10:09 AM, Moran Goldboim wrote:
Short update - rpms for ovirt-engine, are not up in the repo yet - and 
being copied ATM.

we'll send a short update when it's there - should be in beta repo [1]

[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/beta/rpm/


 Original Message 
Subject:Fwd: [Users] [ANN] oVirt 3.3 Test Day - Tomorrow Wed - Jul 24th
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:23:35 +0300
From:   Moran Goldboim mgold...@redhat.com
To: engine-devel engine-de...@ovirt.org, vdsm-de...@ovirt.org



Feature owners, please make sure:

-your feature is updated on release table page [1].
-you have test page for your feature [2].
-your team regression testing section is organized and up to date [3].

Thanks.

[1] 
http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_release-management#Features_Status_Table
[2] 
http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_TestDay#oVirt_3.3_New_Features_-_Test_Status_Table

[3] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_TestDay#Regression_testing


 Original Message 
Subject:[Users] [ANN] oVirt 3.3 Test Day - Tomorrow Wed - Jul 24th
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:00:23 +0300
From:   Moran Goldboim mgold...@redhat.com
CC: users@ovirt.org users@ovirt.org



oVirt 3.3 release is just around the corner, and we would like to 
invite you all to take a taste of the new release [1].


http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_TestDay

Tomorrow morning (when all repos are packages are ready - finger 
crossed) you are invited to:


-checkout Test Day page [2]
-choose a distro (el6/fc19)
-install oVirt [3]
-check out the version
-report what you find

Developers and Users will be available in the channel/ on list to 
support in case there is trouble


Thanks


[1] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_release-management
[2] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_TestDay
[3]http://www.ovirt.org/Download







___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] [ANN] oVirt 3.3 Test Day - Tomorrow Wed - Jul 24th

2013-07-24 Thread Moran Goldboim


For all participants in the test day:

-it would be great if you can put your name/distro here [1]
-if you found a general bug (regression) , you can add it to to the 
table under general [2]


we would like to get some input on general bugs/problems you are 
experiencing.


Thanks.

[1] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_TestDay#Participants_Table
[2] 
http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_TestDay#oVirt_3.3_New_Features_-_Test_Status_Table



On 07/23/2013 03:00 PM, Moran Goldboim wrote:
oVirt 3.3 release is just around the corner, and we would like to 
invite you all to take a taste of the new release [1].


http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_TestDay

Tomorrow morning (when all repos are packages are ready - finger 
crossed) you are invited to:


-checkout Test Day page [2]
-choose a distro (el6/fc19)
-install oVirt [3]
-check out the version
-report what you find

Developers and Users will be available in the channel/ on list to 
support in case there is trouble


Thanks


[1] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_release-management
[2] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_TestDay
[3]http://www.ovirt.org/Download



___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] oVirt 3.3 Test day [postponed in 1 day - Wednesday]

2013-07-23 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 07/23/2013 01:14 AM, Mike Burns wrote:

On 07/22/2013 11:49 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Moran Goldboim  wrote:

owners, please update features/status/test pages on oVirt 3.3 
release page

[1] - if N/A please mark it as such.


[1] http://www.ovirt.org/index.php?title=OVirt_3.3_release-management


Also if possible the expected beta release day (currently marked as 
2013-07-18).

Going at
http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/beta/rpm/EL/6/noarch/
(but the same for Fedora 18 and 19 paths)
I only see a few packages and none of the engine related.

Thanks,
Gianluca

ACK on pushing this out.  There are numerous packages that I don't 
have yet to post.  Namely, engine and vdsm have not yet been provided 
for posting.


Mike


So, test day was moved for tomorrow, i'll send an announcement with all 
the details soon.


Thanks.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] oVirt 3.3 Test day [suggested 1 day delay]

2013-07-22 Thread Moran Goldboim

continuing the tradition of coordinating oVirt test days, i would like 
to postpone this in a day to make sure we are ready for it.


-few features are missing test page (owners are cc'ed) [1]
-features aren't updated on release table
-general test day infra should be better arrange
-several features delivery are still pending.
-basic tests on both distros making sure delivery isn't DOA

owners, please update features/status/test pages on oVirt 3.3 release 
page [1] - if N/A please mark it as such.



[1] http://www.ovirt.org/index.php?title=OVirt_3.3_release-management

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Fedora upgrading from 3.1 to 3.2

2013-06-25 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 06/25/2013 02:52 PM, Alex Lourie wrote:


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Karli Sjöberg karli.sjob...@slu.se 
wrote:

mån 2013-06-24 klockan 12:35 +0003 skrev Alex Lourie: 
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Karli Sjöberg 
karli.sjob...@slu.se wrote:

 mån 2013-06-24 klockan 10:54 +0003 skrev Alex Lourie: 
 On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Karli Sjöberg  
karli.sjob...@slu.se  wrote:

  sön 2013-06-23 klockan 09:38 +0003 skrev Alex Lourie: Hi Karli
I've written up all we know at [1], please try to follow 
it (if  you   haven't yet) and let us know how it goes. If 
anything goes wrong,  we   will look for the ways to resolve it.

   Hi Alex!
Awesome job, I´m going to test this right away and let you 
know  how   it goes. Wish me luck;)

Good luck! May the force be with you.
No no, the source Alex, the source:)
  /K

Sure, that one too.




Hi Karli



Well, it wasn´t with me for long, I have hit BZ 911939 and 901786, 
where fedup fails to find my LVM volumes. In the dracut shell (to 
where it gets dropped), I have good output from blkid and lvm 
pvs|vgs|lvs but no nodes created in /dev/mapper and so the system 
cannot boot and upgrade fails. Do you have any suggestions there that 
might help? In the mean time, I´ll try upgrading using 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum instead, see 
if that gives better success.




Sorry to hear that. Different people have experienced multiple 
problems upgrading lvm-based F17 systems to F18. I don't think that 
there's a magic solution that would just work, each case is usually 
solved on its own.


Let us know how you progress with upgrading with yum.

Alex.


i used same article [1] and had a successful go with it - good luck...

[1] 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_17_-.3E_Fedora_18 







--

Med Vänliga Hälsningar
--- 


Karli Sjöberg
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8)
S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Phone:  +46-(0)18-67 15 66
karli.sjob...@slu.se




___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Fedora upgrading from 3.1 to 3.2

2013-06-24 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 06/23/2013 10:08 PM, Alfred Angelov wrote:

Hey,

This might sounds like a foolish question, but from the link you 
mentioned:


oVirt 3.1 was released as Fedora 17 package while 3.2 is targeted 
Fedora 18. Due to the nature of this upgrade, we DO NOT recommend it, 
users are advised to do a 3.2 clean installation, and to import all 
VM's and template into the new installation. 


Is there anything special I would have to do to import all the VMs 
(around 40) from my ovirt 3.1.0-2 to another ovirt (which runs 3.2.2) ?


you should:
-create and attach an export domain to the relevant datacenter on your 
3.1 system

-export the vms you need to the export domain
-disconnect the export domain
-import the domain on your 3.2.2 system (from storage tab)
-import the vms to the relevant datacenter



Mvh, Alfred Angelov

On 06/23/2013 11:35 AM, Alex Lourie wrote:

Hi Karli

I've written up all we know at [1], please try to follow it (if you 
haven't yet) and let us know how it goes. If anything goes wrong, we 
will look for the ways to resolve it.


Alex.

[1] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.1_to_3.2_upgrade

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Alex Lourie alou...@redhat.com wrote:

Hi Karli

I am reviewing all the actions again, and hopefully will have 
something documented on Sunday.


Alex.

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Karli Sjöberg 
karli.sjob...@slu.se wrote:
 tis 2013-06-18 klockan 10:06 +0300 skrev Moran Goldboim: On  
06/17/2013 02:51 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
mån 2013-06-17 klockan 10:11 +0003 skrev Alex Lourie: On 
Fri,  Jun 14, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Karli Sjöberg 
karli.sjob...@slu.se  wrote:

  Hi!
Hi Karli,
 More than two months have passed without any 
notices or updates  on   this issue, and looking at the 
bugreport absolutely nothing has  been   done since then. 
What´s confusing me is that the release  management   for 
oVirt 3.2 has this clearly printed:

  MUST: Upgrade from previous release
And you all seem too busy with getting the next 
release out of  the   door before fixing the current... 
What gives? Don´t you care  about   early adopters?
I apologise that this issue wasn't taken care of 
yet. It is clear  that  the priorities of developers shifted 
towards work on features in  3.3  release, which feature 
freeze is happening in about 2 weeks, so  you can  
understand the time pressure they all have. There's no need to be 
 angry  about that. It is an open source project and as 
resources for the  development are limited, we're trying to do 
our best to cover as  much  issues as possible. This can 
lead to situations as this issue,  which  may be left behind 
for some time.
I´m not angry, as I stated before, I´m more confused, 
and maybe a  little disappointed that important(in my opinion) 
pieces of a  projects continuum have been ignored like that. I´m 
having a hard  time understanding the reasoning behind the 
priorities that have  made this issue appear. In my mind, making 
sure that users of any  project are able to follow between minor 
upgrades is a given, with  a schedule like; 1) Feature freeze, 2) 
Fix release blockers  (upgrading being one of them), 3) Release, 
in that order. Now  what´s happening is that you are kind of 
hoping to drag this out  until the problem goes away by itself 
when you decide it´s time to  stop supporting 3.1.
  That said, the process for upgrading the oVirt 3.1 on 
Fedora 17 to  oVirt 3.2 on Fedora 18 is complex and non-trivial, 
that's why it  is  taking time to resolve all the issues 
that come up in the process.
  If this matter is not extremely urgent, we are currently 
working  on a  tool that may make this upgrade easier, 
albeit, maybe, not  completely  automatic.
  On the other hand, if this is a completely and utterly 
urgent, we  may  try to guide you through possible manual 
attempts to perform the  upgrade. Mind though, that they weren't 
thoroughly tested, and not  promised to go smoothly or even 
work, and we may have to think  about  possible alternative 
solutions on the go.
Straight answer: Am I ever going to be able to upgrade 
from 3.1 to  3.2?
  My concern (fear) is about being left behind, abandoned. It 
makes  me feel non-important. Just like any admin, the work put 
down to  make Templates, to set up quotas, create VMPools, a 
dozen of  guests. And then have to export everything (nullifying 
the idea of  Thin Provisioning), redo every Role, reset every 
permission,  quota, and so on, isn´t (in my opinion) viable in 
the long run for  oVirt as a project to demand. That´s why I had 
the notion that  upgrading surely had to be a high priority. Was 
I wrong about that?
upgrade actually was high priority task, but due to lots 
of platform  (fedora 18) changes, it became a huge operation to 
support it (which  comes on top new features/bugs/support etc.).
 in addition we have noticed that the interest from the community 
 regarding it, is very limited.

  from where i see i we have couple

Re: [Users] Fedora upgrading from 3.1 to 3.2

2013-06-18 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 06/17/2013 02:51 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:

mån 2013-06-17 klockan 10:11 +0003 skrev Alex Lourie:

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Karli Sjöberg karli.sjob...@slu.se  
mailto:karli.sjob...@slu.se
wrote:
 Hi!


Hi Karli,


 More than two months have passed without any notices or updates on
 this issue, and looking at the bugreport absolutely nothing has been
 done since then. What´s confusing me is that the release management
 for oVirt 3.2 has this clearly printed:
 MUST: Upgrade from previous release

 And you all seem too busy with getting the next release out of the
 door before fixing the current... What gives? Don´t you care about
 early adopters?


I apologise that this issue wasn't taken care of yet. It is clear that
the priorities of developers shifted towards work on features in 3.3
release, which feature freeze is happening in about 2 weeks, so you can
understand the time pressure they all have. There's no need to be angry
about that. It is an open source project and as resources for the
development are limited, we're trying to do our best to cover as much
issues as possible. This can lead to situations as this issue, which
may be left behind for some time.


I´m not angry, as I stated before, I´m more confused, and maybe a 
little disappointed that important(in my opinion) pieces of a projects 
continuum have been ignored like that. I´m having a hard time 
understanding the reasoning behind the priorities that have made this 
issue appear. In my mind, making sure that users of any project are 
able to follow between minor upgrades is a given, with a schedule 
like; 1) Feature freeze, 2) Fix release blockers (upgrading being one 
of them), 3) Release, in that order. Now what´s happening is that you 
are kind of hoping to drag this out until the problem goes away by 
itself when you decide it´s time to stop supporting 3.1.



That said, the process for upgrading the oVirt 3.1 on Fedora 17 to
oVirt 3.2 on Fedora 18 is complex and non-trivial, that's why it is
taking time to resolve all the issues that come up in the process.

If this matter is not extremely urgent, we are currently working on a
tool that may make this upgrade easier, albeit, maybe, not completely
automatic.

On the other hand, if this is a completely and utterly urgent, we may
try to guide you through possible manual attempts to perform the
upgrade. Mind though, that they weren't thoroughly tested, and not
promised to go smoothly or even work, and we may have to think about
possible alternative solutions on the go.


Straight answer: Am I ever going to be able to upgrade from 3.1 to 3.2?

My concern (fear) is about being left behind, abandoned. It makes me 
feel non-important. Just like any admin, the work put down to make 
Templates, to set up quotas, create VMPools, a dozen of guests. And 
then have to export everything (nullifying the idea of Thin 
Provisioning), redo every Role, reset every permission, quota, and so 
on, isn´t (in my opinion) viable in the long run for oVirt as a 
project to demand. That´s why I had the notion that upgrading surely 
had to be a high priority. Was I wrong about that?


upgrade actually was high priority task, but due to lots of platform 
(fedora 18) changes, it became a huge operation to support it (which 
comes on top new features/bugs/support etc.).
in addition we have noticed that the interest from the community 
regarding it, is very limited.


from where i see i we have couple of options:
-if there is enough interest from the community we can give it another 
go (though i think most of it moved long ago to oVirt 3.2)
-we can help individuals by making a migration (3.1-3.2) document on 
fedora base systems- we'll probably need your assistance on testing side 
here






Best regards,
Alex Lourie,
Software Developer in Integration,
RHEV, Red Hat.


 Best Regards
 Karli Sjöberg

 fre 2013-04-05 klockan 10:24 +0200 skrev Sandro Bonazzola: Hi Karli,
 we're still working on it


 Il 02/04/2013 12:22, Karli Sjöberg ha scritto:


  Hi,

 has there been any progress regarding this matter?

 Best Regards
 Karli Sjöberg

 fre 2013-03-15 klockan 14:12 + skrev Karli Sjöberg:
 fre 2013-03-15 klockan 14:59 +0100 skrev Sandro Bonazzola:
 Il 13/03/2013 12:24, Karli Sjöberg ha scritto:

 ons 2013-03-13 klockan 12:00 +0100 skrev Dave Neary: Hi Karli,

 On 03/11/2013 12:16 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
  Hi,
 
  in the absence of any official path,  we have started working
 out our own
  procedure for going from oVirt-3.1/Fedora 17 to
 oVirt-3.2/Fedora 18.

 Indeed, I have not seen any documentation in the wiki yet on
 upgrading
 oVirt - would you be interested in writing up your experiences
 there as
 a guide to others?

 Thanks!
 Dave.


  That was my intention to share a working procedure once it was
 complete but I unfortunately hit a wall at engine-upgrade. I
 would be very glad, and able to continue, if that obstacle could
 be lifted.


 My experience in upgrading from oVirt-3.1/Fedora 17 to

Re: [Users] engine-iso-uploader error

2013-06-01 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 05/31/2013 11:44 AM, Neil wrote:

Hi guys,

I'm running the following RPM versions from the dreyou repo and I've
recently upgraded my engine to 3.2.1 and when I try uploading I was
getting...

ERROR: [ERROR]::key_file, cert_file, ca_file must be specified for SSL
connection.

I googled around and found lots of posts relating to packages needing
to be upgraded, so I upgraded the following...

-- Running transaction check
--- Package ovirt-engine-cli.noarch 0:3.2.0.10-1.el6 will be updated
--- Package ovirt-engine-cli.noarch 0:3.2.0.12-1.el6 will be an update
--- Package ovirt-engine-sdk.noarch 0:3.2.0.9-1.el6 will be updated
--- Package ovirt-engine-sdk.noarch 0:3.2.0.11-1.el6 will be an update
--- Package ovirt-image-uploader.noarch 0:3.1.0-16.el6 will be updated
--- Package ovirt-image-uploader.noarch 0:3.2.0-1.el6 will be an update
--- Package ovirt-iso-uploader.noarch 0:3.1.0-16.el6 will be updated
--- Package ovirt-iso-uploader.noarch 0:3.2.0-1.el6 will be an update
--- Package ovirt-log-collector.noarch 0:3.1.0-16.el6 will be updated
--- Package ovirt-log-collector.noarch 0:3.2.0-1.el6 will be an update

warning: /etc/ovirt-engine/logcollector.conf created as
/etc/ovirt-engine/logcollector.conf.rpmnew
   Updating   : ovirt-iso-uploader-3.2.0-1.el6.noarch

 5/10
warning: /etc/ovirt-engine/isouploader.conf created as
/etc/ovirt-engine/isouploader.conf.rpmnew

I backed up and replaced the older conf files with the rpmnew ones
(above only) too and restarted ovirt once the updates were done, and
instead of the original error, I'm now getting the following error...

[root@backup src]# engine-iso-uploader -i ISO upload
SW_CD_Windows_Svr_Std_2003_R2_32-BIT_X64_English_ISO_32bit_2_MLF_X13-73746.ISO
Please provide the REST API username for oVirt Engine (CTRL+D to abort): admin
Please provide the REST API password for the admin oVirt Engine user
(CTRL+D to abort):
ERROR: Unable to connect to REST API.  Reason: Unauthorized
ERROR: 'NoneType' object is not iterable
INFO: Use the -h option to see usage.

Anyone got any ideas what to try next?

Thank you.

Regards.

Neil Wilson.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Hi Neil,
oVirt 3.2.2 is already out and available @ 
http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/stable/rpm/EL/6/
it sounds like an old bug which we used to have, any chance you can try 
ovirt 3.2.2 official release repo?


Thanks.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] oVirt 3.2.1 and clone from snapshot.... argh...!!!

2013-04-28 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 04/25/2013 04:40 PM, Maor Lipchuk wrote:

Hi Gianluca,
I see in that the hash (7612977fbbd3f5ba9ac68cae2fe88a30577ed732) exists
in the branch there for it should get in the next build, Just to be on
the safe side, Moran, can u please re-verify it.

Regards,
Maor


7612977fbbd3f5ba9ac68cae2fe88a30577ed732 is in line for the next ovirt 
maintenance release.
Moran.



On 04/24/2013 07:14 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:

Il giorno 19/mar/2013 17:10, Maor Lipchuk mlipc...@redhat.com
mailto:mlipc...@redhat.com ha scritto:

FYI, the patch is at http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/13172/

Thanks for your attention,
Maor

On 03/19/2013 05:52 PM, Maor Lipchuk wrote:

Hi Gianluca, I checked the code of 3.2 and you are right, the patch was
not pushed there.
Although it seems that the origin fix exists in 3.2, I will send a patch
to fix that.

Regards,
Maor

On 03/19/2013 05:41 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:

Hello,
in my opinion 3.2.1 for fedora 18 doesn't contain this:
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/11254/

that was one of the biggest problems of 3.2

see also this thread of mine:
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-February/012653.html

I had to recompile 3.2 in the mean time and after update to 3.2.1 I
have again the same problems:
- clone from snapshot blocked white window
- snapshot details pane no information for network and disks

So this update was totally worthless for me and I have to recompile
again 3.2.1
bad!

Gianluca
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org mailto:Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users



___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org mailto:Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users




Hello,  I see that 3.2.2 is expected next week.
Are we sure this patch went into?
Any prebuilt rpms I can test against eventually?
It would be a pain having for the third time (after 3.2.0 and 3.2.1)
this feature not available in stock rpm repo and I didn't read anything
blocking it.
I also proposed to include its testing in testing cycle so that it could
arise there before release. ..
Cheers,
Gianluca





___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] problem with all-in-one ovirt install on Centos 6.3 related to hostname resolution

2013-03-06 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 03/06/2013 06:12 PM, Frederic Bevia wrote:

Sandro Bonazzola sbonazzo@... writes:


Hi Frederic, thanks for your report!
..;

Please run engine-cleanup, engine-setup and check ovirt-engine status if
it fails again.
If it fails, can you please attach your logs?


Regards,
Sandro


Hi Sandro,
thanks very much for your answer.
I did run engine-cleanup, engine-setup and check ovirt-engine status and it
failed again. But, meanwhile, to validate my hypothesis on the faulty name
resolution, I installed dnsmasq, a small dns proxy/forwarder, on the same server
(srv-santos.cg33.fr), wich can resolve name from local hosts file and from
upstream DNS.
Then, i re-run engine-setup, and bingo! :-)) no name résolution pbms and no
error on JBoss..
Alas! it failed again  shortly afterwards  with this message:
could not create ovirtsdk API object
It seems to be a known bug cf.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869457;, fixed in lasts fedora's
packages.. but apprently not in the ovirt-all-in-one packages on Centos 6.
So unless if someone have a solution for this pbm, other than  install ovirt on
a fedora distrib with the last package of course,
i just decided to stay on my centos 6,  uninstall ovirt all-in-one and guive a
try to  a standard engine instal + a standard vdsm install on the same machine
with the regular ovirt packages for centos.

Regards,
Frederic


Hi Federic,

if you just want to have a look at oVirt 3.2, get some experience with 
it or deploy it.
you can try the ovirt-live image[1], just boot it up from a usb and you 
have oVirt 3.2 up and running.

(based on fedora18)

[1]http://wiki.ovirt.org/OVirt_Live


___
Users mailing list
Users at ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users





___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] engine 3.2 installation issue

2013-02-27 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 02/27/2013 09:56 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:


I found problems too with firewalld in fedora 18.
I got an error if I remember correctly, so I ran again specifying iptables



___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


any chance you are hitting [Bug 904153] engine-setup hangs on Firewalld 
config ?
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] oVirt 3.2 testday

2013-02-03 Thread Moran Goldboim


Thanks for all the ones participating this day.
we would like to get some feedback from you after testing this beta version.
how do you feel with respect to:
-stability - basic flows
-new features
-blocker bugs (should be added to this version tracker [1])

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881006


Thanks,
Moran.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] oVirt 3.2 testday

2013-02-03 Thread Moran Goldboim


removing non-relevant list.

On 02/03/2013 03:37 PM, Moran Goldboim wrote:

Thanks for all the ones participating this day.
we would like to get some feedback from you after testing this beta 
version.

how do you feel with respect to:
-stability - basic flows
-new features
-blocker bugs (should be added to this version tracker [1])

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881006


Thanks,
Moran.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] [Reminder] oVirt 3.2 test-day is today!!

2013-01-30 Thread Moran Goldboim

Today are having oVirt 3.2 testday - 
http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/OvirtTestDay


you are welcome to take an active part on testing oVirt 3.2 new 
features[1], look around and get a deeper experience with this oVirt 
release.


[1] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.2_release-management#Features

Moran.


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] oVirt 3.2 Release delayed

2013-01-28 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 01/28/2013 08:21 PM, Joop wrote:

Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cec...@gmail.com wrote:



Hello,
I was interested on providing feedack for the test day, but I presume
that no official announcement for beta implies no test day for
tomorrow, correct?
Let me know, please, if I have to allocate some of my time for that
activity.


I was wondering the same, are there any directions for helping out on test day?

Joop




we are planing to delay test day for a couple of days to have all infra 
ready for it.

I'll send all details in a separate mail.

Moran.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] oVirt Live 0.8 AIO: Adding Local Datacenter and cluster... ERROR

2012-11-28 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 11/26/2012 04:38 PM, Dennis Böck wrote:


Hi OVirt-List,

I started oVirt live 0.8 with auto configuration. At the Point AIO: 
Adding Local Datacenter and cluster I get the error message: Could 
not create local datacenter.


Log files are attached.

Does anyone have an idea?

Best regards

Dennis


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


that's a bit odd, looks like you already had a local DC in your 
deployment, shouldn't be the case of first boot.

are you booting with it, or it's happening after installation to HD?

Moran.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] oVirt-Live-0.8.iso - beta version Nov 15th 2012

2012-11-14 Thread Moran Goldboim



 oVirt-Live-0.8.iso - beta version Nov 15th 2012


   Download

download oVirt-Live-0.8.iso 
http://ovirt.org/releases/3.1/tools/oVirt-Live.0.8.iso



   change-log

-mostly changes to make installation work when no Ethernet interface 
connected


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] allinone setup can't add storage

2012-11-07 Thread Moran Goldboim

you are using ovirt-sdk from stable repo and engine from nightly repo, 
those doesn't work together.



On 11/07/2012 01:40 PM, Cristian Falcas wrote:

Hi all,

Can someone help me with this error:

AIO: Adding Local Datacenter and cluster... [ ERROR ]
Error: could not create ovirtsdk API object


trace from the log file

2012-11-07 13:34:44::DEBUG::all_in_one_100::220::root:: Initiating the 
API object
2012-11-07 13:34:44::ERROR::all_in_one_100::231::root:: Traceback 
(most recent call last):
  File /usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/plugins/all_in_one_100.py, 
line 228, in initAPI

ca_file=basedefs.FILE_CA_CRT_SRC,
TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'ca_file'

2012-11-07 13:34:44::DEBUG::setup_sequences::62::root:: Traceback 
(most recent call last):
  File /usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/setup_sequences.py, line 60, 
in run

function()
  File /usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/plugins/all_in_one_100.py, 
line 232, in initAPI

raise Exception(ERROR_CREATE_API_OBJECT)
Exception: Error: could not create ovirtsdk API object


Versions installed:

ovirt-engine-3.1.0-3.20121106.git6891171.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-backend-3.1.0-3.20121106.git6891171.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-cli-3.1.0.6-1.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-config-3.1.0-3.20121106.git6891171.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-dbscripts-3.1.0-3.20121106.git6891171.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-genericapi-3.1.0-3.20121106.git6891171.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-notification-service-3.1.0-3.20121106.git6891171.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-restapi-3.1.0-3.20121106.git6891171.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-sdk-3.1.0.4-1.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-setup-3.1.0-3.20121106.git6891171.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-allinone-3.1.0-3.20121106.git6891171.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-tools-common-3.1.0-3.20121106.git6891171.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-userportal-3.1.0-3.20121106.git6891171.fc17.noarch
ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-3.1.0-3.20121106.git6891171.fc17.noarch


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] oVirt-Live-0.7.iso - beta version Oct 23th 2012

2012-10-23 Thread Moran Goldboim


=== oVirt-Live-0.7.iso - beta version Oct 23th 2012 ===

wiki: http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/OVirt_Live

 Download 
[http://ovirt.org/releases/3.1/tools/oVirt-Live-0.7.iso download 
oVirt-Live-0.7.iso]


 change-log 
-changed wallpapers (thanks Garrett)

-oVirt-setup autostart added

-oVirt-enigne welcome screen (via firefox) after successful setup

-oVirt-setup terminal window stays open after setup (for debug needs)

-Disconnected installs - setup works without outside network connection 
(packages wouldn't be updated by vsdm-bootstrap, yum reinstall 
vdsm-bootstrap to workaround)


-wlan0 support in vdsm enabled (need someone to test it...)



___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] oVirt-Live-0.7.iso - beta version Oct 23th 2012

2012-10-23 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 10/24/2012 12:11 AM, Jason Brooks wrote:

On 10/23/2012 02:14 PM, Moran Goldboim wrote:

=== oVirt-Live-0.7.iso - beta version Oct 23th 2012 ===

wiki: http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/OVirt_Live

 Download 
[http://ovirt.org/releases/3.1/tools/oVirt-Live-0.7.iso download
oVirt-Live-0.7.iso]


Cool, I'll check it out. Might be worth considering making DeltaISOs 
between releases: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Delta_ISOs


i'll look into it.


2GB is a big dl, and I imagine there'll be more revs of this.


more revs -yes, there are 2 big iso files contained in it:
-Fedora-17-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso -645MB - uses for live os on a vm
-ovirt-node-iso-2.5.5-0.1.fc17.iso - 173MB - uses for additional 
installation of a ovirt-node


i think that in the future we can make it more modular.



Also, is the kickstart file this is built from available?


soon to be up on ovirt.org (once v1.0 is out...)
Moran.



Thanks, Jason




 change-log 
-changed wallpapers (thanks Garrett)

-oVirt-setup autostart added

-oVirt-enigne welcome screen (via firefox) after successful setup

-oVirt-setup terminal window stays open after setup (for debug needs)

-Disconnected installs - setup works without outside network connection
(packages wouldn't be updated by vsdm-bootstrap, yum reinstall
vdsm-bootstrap to workaround)

-wlan0 support in vdsm enabled (need someone to test it...)



___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users





___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Install on USB stick fails

2012-10-23 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 10/22/2012 01:25 AM, Alexandre Santos wrote:

Hi,
I've been using a 8GB USB stick to boot the oVirt Node but with only 8 
GB i have no swap and less than 1 GB available for log. I bought a 16 
GB but now I can't boot with this one.

It gives 2 warnings:
dracut Warning: Unable to process initqueue
dracut Warning: /dev/mapper/live-rw does not exist

Dropping to debug shell.

dmesg gives the following info:

EXT4-fs (sda2): mounted filessystem without journal. Opts: (null)
then those warnings and the boot stops, going to a dracut shell.

Any ideas?

Alex


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


might be this specific usb dirve.
-try to look here: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=281692
-you might try the nested virtualization option - described in the wiki[1]

[1] http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/OVirt_Live
Moran.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] oVirt-Live-0.6.iso - alpha version Oct 12th 2012

2012-10-12 Thread Moran Goldboim



 oVirt-Live-0.6.iso - alpha version Oct 12th 2012

wiki: http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/OVirt_Live


   Download

download oVirt-Live-0.6.iso 
http://ovirt.org/releases/3.1/tools/oVirt-Live-0.6.iso



   change-log

-selinux disabled - workaround to sanlock problem

-added ovirt_live plugin - performs attachment of iso domain to the DC, 
and creating vm with disk and network- thanks to Ofer


-changed ovirt-setup icons

-shorten host installation time by around 4 minutes


 Problems/Bugs

-persistent storage is slow - bigger it gets - slower it does

-currently working with selinux in permissive - problem running vms 
(sanlock)


-ovirt-setup should run as autostart


so a bit more stable version now that actually brings you to a working 
system with vm ready to go (almost) - Thanks to Ofer, and few optimizations.


currently persistent storage is making the system very slow.
i have been starting to look on some FS optimizations, would be nice if 
someone can give a hand here.

some references:
-  http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=9t=850
- 
http://cptl.org/wp/index.php/2010/03/30/tuning-solid-state-drives-in-linux/


Moran.

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Ovirt live USB - aka oVirt on a stick

2012-10-11 Thread Moran Goldboim

well, i think i have something to start playing with, it's still an 
*alpha* version and lots to be done.

go over the wiki [1] and try it out [2].

[1] http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/OVirt_Live
[2] http://ovirt.org/releases/3.1/tools/oVirt-Live-0.5.iso

On 09/13/2012 12:55 AM, Moran Goldboim wrote:
In order To improve the ease of installation, we are working on two 
new tools:


1. Fedora oVirt spin

We are planning on integrating oVirt to a live fedora spin[1]

This will simplify the the installation for new users. It will contain 
the oVirt AllInOne [2] on top of a Fedora liveCD desktop.
This will allow users to experiment with oVirt before later installing 
it.
The idea is user will install fedora from the CD, then answer the 
questions of the all-in-one setup.



2. Simple demo environment

As a second stage, for simple demo use cases, we want to take this one 
step further.
We'd like to extend this live spin to include a complete environment - 
sample vm/template/iso/node,etc so that a user can boot from a USB 
key  and have a complete environment that's pre-installed and 
configured, this will probably will be done with a script calling one 
of the APIs[3] to create it.


The user would download an image, write it to a USB disk and then boot 
it[4].

the idea is user can copy this iso to a usb disk (or a qcow/vdmk) and
Once booted the user will have a pre-installed, pre-configured oVirt 
Engine, host and local storage domain complete with ISOs, VM and 
template.


any suggestions/help will be appreciated

[1]http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Custom
[2]http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Feature/AllInOne
[3]http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/CLI  |http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/SDK
[4] bare metal or nested virtualization



___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] Ovirt live USB - aka oVirt on a stick

2012-09-12 Thread Moran Goldboim


In order To improve the ease of installation, we are working on two new tools:

1. Fedora oVirt spin

We are planning on integrating oVirt to a live fedora spin[1]

This will simplify the the installation for new users. It will contain the oVirt 
AllInOne [2] on top of a Fedora liveCD desktop.
This will allow users to experiment with oVirt before later installing it.
The idea is user will install fedora from the CD, then answer the questions of 
the all-in-one setup.


2. Simple demo environment

As a second stage, for simple demo use cases, we want to take this one step 
further.
We'd like to extend this live spin to include a complete environment - sample 
vm/template/iso/node,etc so that a user can boot from a USB key  and have a 
complete environment that's pre-installed and configured, this will probably 
will be done with a script calling one of the APIs[3] to create it.

The user would download an image, write it to a USB disk and then boot it[4].
the idea is user can copy this iso to a usb disk (or a qcow/vdmk) and
Once booted the user will have a pre-installed, pre-configured oVirt Engine, 
host and local storage domain complete with ISOs, VM and template.

any suggestions/help will be appreciated

[1]http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Custom
[2]http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Feature/AllInOne
[3]http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/CLI  |http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/SDK
[4] bare metal or nested virtualization

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] creating and running a vm fails

2012-03-29 Thread Moran Goldboim

) 
Task=`22afe74b-e4a8-421b-84b3-6c9295dce788`::moving from state preparing -  
state finished
Thread-55028::DEBUG::2012-03-29 
09:51:22,757::resourceManager::809::ResourceManager.Owner::(releaseAll) 
Owner.releaseAll requests {} resources 
{'Storage.13080edc-77ea-11e1-b6a4-525400c49d2a':  ResourceRef 
'Storage.13080edc-77ea-11e1-b6a4-525400c49d2a', isValid: 'True' obj: 'None'}
Thread-55028::DEBUG::2012-03-29 
09:51:22,759::resourceManager::844::ResourceManager.Owner::(cancelAll) 
Owner.cancelAll requests {}
Thread-55028::DEBUG::2012-03-29 
09:51:22,761::resourceManager::538::ResourceManager::(releaseResource) Trying 
to release resource 'Storage.13080edc-77ea-11e1-b6a4-525400c49d2a'
Thread-55028::DEBUG::2012-03-29 
09:51:22,763::resourceManager::553::ResourceManager::(releaseResource) Released 
resource 'Storage.13080edc-77ea-11e1-b6a4-525400c49d2a' (0 active users)
Thread-55028::DEBUG::2012-03-29 
09:51:22,764::resourceManager::558::ResourceManager::(releaseResource) Resource 
'Storage.13080edc-77ea-11e1-b6a4-525400c49d2a' is free, finding out if anyone 
is waiting for it.
Thread-55028::DEBUG::2012-03-29 
09:51:22,766::resourceManager::565::ResourceManager::(releaseResource) No one 
is waiting for resource 'Storage.13080edc-77ea-11e1-b6a4-525400c49d2a', 
Clearing records.
Thread-55028::DEBUG::2012-03-29 
09:51:22,768::task::978::TaskManager.Task::(_decref) 
Task=`22afe74b-e4a8-421b-84b3-6c9295dce788`::ref 0 aborting False
Dummy-93::DEBUG::2012-03-29 
09:51:23,999::storage_mailbox::640::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_checkForMail) 'dd 
if=/rhev/data-center/13080edc-77ea-11e1-b6a4-525400c49d2a/mastersd/dom_md/inbox 
iflag=direct,fullblock count=1 bs=1024000' (cwd None)
Dummy-93::DEBUG::2012-03-29 
09:51:24,459::storage_mailbox::640::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_checkForMail) 
SUCCESS:err  = '1+0 records in\n1+0 records out\n1024000 bytes (1.0 MB) copied, 
0.178758 s, 5.7 MB/s\n';rc  = 0
Dummy-93::DEBUG::2012-03-29 
09:51:26,507::storage_mailbox::640::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(_checkForMail) 'dd 
if=/rhev/data-center/13080edc-77ea-11e1-b6a4-525400c49d2a/mastersd/dom_md/inbox 
iflag=direct,fullblock count=1 bs=1024000' (cwd None)

Regards, rene


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org] Im Auftrag von 
Rene Rosenberger
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. März 2012 09:32
An: Moran Goldboim
Cc: users@oVirt.org
Betreff: Re: [Users] creating and running a vm fails

Hi,

i have just retried to start the vm what fails again. Looking in 
/var/log/vsdm/vdsm.log shows last entry on 27.03.2012.

MainThread::INFO::2012-03-27 10:58:13,525::vdsm::70::vds::(run) I am the actual 
vdsm 4.9-0
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 
10:58:15,120::resourceManager::379::ResourceManager::(registerNamespace) 
Registering namespace 'Storage'
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 
10:58:15,122::threadPool::45::Misc.ThreadPool::(__init__) Enter - numThreads: 
10.0, waitTimeout: 3, maxTasks: 500.0
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 
10:58:15,393::multipath::109::Storage.Multipath::(isEnabled) multipath 
Defaulting to False
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 
10:58:15,398::multipath::123::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(setupMultipath) 
'/usr/bin/sudo -n /bin/cp /tmp/tmpkart5V /etc/multipath.conf' (cwd None)
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 
10:58:15,505::multipath::123::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(setupMultipath) SUCCESS:err  = 
'';rc  = 0
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 
10:58:15,508::multipath::131::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(setupMultipath) 
'/usr/bin/sudo -n /sbin/multipath -F' (cwd None)
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 
10:58:15,591::multipath::131::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(setupMultipath) FAILED:err  = 
'';rc  = 1
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 
10:58:15,600::multipath::134::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(setupMultipath) 
'/usr/bin/sudo -n /sbin/service multipathd restart' (cwd None)
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 
10:58:16,123::multipath::134::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(setupMultipath) SUCCESS:err  = 
'';rc  = 0
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 
10:58:16,130::hsm::334::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(__validateLvmLockingType) 
'/usr/bin/sudo -n /sbin/lvm dumpconfig global/locking_type' (cwd None)
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 
10:58:16,424::hsm::334::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(__validateLvmLockingType) SUCCESS:err 
 = '';rc  = 0
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 
10:58:16,428::lvm::316::OperationMutex::(_reloadpvs) Operation 'lvm reload 
operation' got the operation mutex
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 10:58:16,434::lvm::284::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(cmd) '/usr/bin/sudo -n /sbin/lvm 
pvs --config  devices { preferred_names = [\\^/dev/mapper/\\] ignore_suspended_devices=1 
write_cache_state=0 disable_after_error_count=3 filter = [ \\r%.*%\\ ] }  global {  
locking_type=1  prioritise_write_locks=1  wait_for_locks=1 }  backup {  retain_min = 50  retain_days = 0 } 
 --noheadings --units b --nosuffix --separator | -o 
uuid,name,size,vg_name,vg_uuid,pe_start,pe_count,pe_alloc_count,mda_count,dev_size' (cwd None)
MainThread::DEBUG::2012-03-27 10:58:16,708::lvm::284::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(cmd) 
SUCCESS:err

Re: [Users] VDS Exception in log file

2012-03-26 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 03/26/2012 02:39 PM, Rene Rosenberger wrote:


Hi,

in my logfile i have the following error messages:

org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VDSInfoReturnForXmlRpc@7fecdc36 
mailto:org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VDSInfoReturnForXmlRpc@7fecdc36 



2012-03-26 14:30:48,897 
INFO[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.BrokerCommandBase] 
(QuartzScheduler_Worker-65) Vds: KVM-DMZ-04


2012-03-26 14:30:48,898 ERROR 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VDSCommandBase] 
(QuartzScheduler_Worker-65) Command GetCapabilitiesVDS execution 
failed. Exception: VDSErrorException: VDSGenericException: 
VDSErrorException: Failed to GetCapabilitiesVDS, error = Unexpected 
exception


2012-03-26 14:30:48,996 
WARN[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsManager] 
(QuartzScheduler_Worker-65) 
ResourceManager::refreshVdsRunTimeInfo::Failed to refresh VDS , vds = 
5a4af34a-770e-11e1-98fb-1b813bbe4e6a : KVM-DMZ-04, error = 
VDSErrorException: VDSGenericException: VDSErrorException: Failed to 
GetCapabilitiesVDS, error = Unexpected exception, continuing.


2012-03-26 14:30:48,997 ERROR 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsManager] 
(QuartzScheduler_Worker-65) ResourceManager::refreshVdsRunTimeInfo: 
org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VDSErrorException: 
VDSGenericException: VDSErrorException: Failed to GetCapabilitiesVDS, 
error = Unexpected exception


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.BrokerCommandBase.ProceedProxyReturnValue(BrokerCommandBase.java:189) 
[vdsbroker-3.1.0-0001.jar:]


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.GetCapabilitiesVDSCommand.ExecuteVdsBrokerCommand(GetCapabilitiesVDSCommand.java:21) 
[vdsbroker-3.1.0-0001.jar:]


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VdsBrokerCommand.ExecuteVDSCommand(VdsBrokerCommand.java:75) 
[vdsbroker-3.1.0-0001.jar:]


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VDSCommandBase.ExecuteCommand(VDSCommandBase.java:60) 
[vdsbroker-3.1.0-0001.jar:]


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.VdcCommandBase.Execute(VdcCommandBase.java:41) 
[engine-dal.jar:]


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsManager.refreshCapabilities(VdsManager.java:550) 
[vdsbroker-3.1.0-0001.jar:]


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo.beforeFirstRefreshTreatment(VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo.java:752) 
[vdsbroker-3.1.0-0001.jar:]


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo.refreshVdsRunTimeInfo(VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo.java:420) 
[vdsbroker-3.1.0-0001.jar:]


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo.Refresh(VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo.java:256) 
[vdsbroker-3.1.0-0001.jar:]


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsManager$1.runInTransaction(VdsManager.java:237) 
[vdsbroker-3.1.0-0001.jar:]


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.transaction.TransactionSupport.executeInSuppressed(TransactionSupport.java:168) 
[engine-utils.jar:]


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.transaction.TransactionSupport.executeInScope(TransactionSupport.java:107) 
[engine-utils.jar:]


at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsManager.OnTimer(VdsManager.java:218) [vdsbroker-3.1.0-0001.jar:] 



at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor14.invoke(Unknown Source) 
[:1.6.0_22]


at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) 
[:1.6.0_22]


at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) [:1.6.0_22]

at 
org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.timer.JobWrapper.execute(JobWrapper.java:64) 
[engine-scheduler.jar:]


at org.quartz.core.JobRunShell.run(JobRunShell.java:216) 
[quartz-1.8.3.jar:]


at 
org.quartz.simpl.SimpleThreadPool$WorkerThread.run(SimpleThreadPool.java:549) 
[quartz-1.8.3.jar:]


what can I do to get rid of these messages? What do I have to fix?

Regards, rene


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users



you probably have a non-responsive host in your system (no communication 
engine-vdsm) - put it into maintenance and the engine will stop trying 
to sample it.

Moran.

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Vm is in a Image locked status

2012-03-14 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 03/14/2012 05:20 PM, Michel van Horssen wrote:

Hi,

Mentioned it before on the Node list but am trying it here as well.

Somehow by stopping and starting stuff, hosts, vm's etc. I ended up with a VM that is in 
an Image locked state.

The host (VDSM) the engine reports it's running on is active the storage 
doesn't have a disk for this vm, which it had when I installed it.

This all happened when a migrate went wrong.

My question is how to destroy this vm. It's just a test so I don't mind killing 
it, question is how.

Thnx,

Michel
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Michel, can you please open a bug and attach vdsm+ovirt logs when the 
problem happened.

Make sure it's not running on each of the hosts.
try to run : psql  engine -c SELECT * from vm_static where vm_name 
ilike 'xxx';
get the vm_guid from it and run: psql  engine -c update vm_dynamic SET 
status=0 where vm_guid='xxx-xxx-xxx';


Moran.

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] can not use a standard data domain

2012-03-13 Thread Moran Goldboim

On 03/12/2012 07:47 PM, Dominic Kaiser wrote:
I noticed permisions on files in the that folder are saying group # 96
what is the 96 group and should it be kvm? On the /mnt folder should
the files read owner:vdsm group:kvm on all files?

Yes, user and group should be vdsm:kvm (36:36) on all /rhev tree.
Moran.

Dominic

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Dominic Kaiser
domi...@bostonvineyard.org mailto:domi...@bostonvineyard.org wrote:

Hello Moran,

Thanks for responding.

Here is output you asked for and I have selinux disabled on this host:

ls -lZh c10c25e0-526a-11e1-a5e4-87fa674ffb5d/
lrwxrwxrwx vdsm kvm ?
095fcd9d-6203-496f-b254-7a9eafaa8ac2 -

/rhev/data-center/mnt/10.3.0.248:_mnt_mainstorage_mainstorage_MainStorage_ISO/095fcd9d-6203-496f-b254-7a9eafaa8ac2
lrwxrwxrwx vdsm kvm ?
14308dd8-1fd1-452c-a288-2f975ef31de1 -

/rhev/data-center/mnt/_var_lib_vdsm_storage/14308dd8-1fd1-452c-a288-2f975ef31de1
lrwxrwxrwx vdsm kvm ?
340dad49-2ec7-475e-b6c6-668504bdb5b1 -

/rhev/data-center/mnt/10.3.0.248:_mnt_mainstorage_mainstorage_MainStorage_MS/340dad49-2ec7-475e-b6c6-668504bdb5b1
lrwxrwxrwx vdsm kvm ?
651cb693-3ffa-43b6-ab49-43cfb03d179b -

/rhev/data-center/mnt/ruth.bostonvineyard.org:_mnt_ruthstorage1_mainstorage_data/651cb693-3ffa-43b6-ab49-43cfb03d179b
lrwxrwxrwx vdsm kvm ?
bcc2d564-2daa-45ae-990b-0d27a17e47e0 -

/rhev/data-center/mnt/10.3.0.248:_mnt_mainstorage_mainstorage_MainStorage_Export/bcc2d564-2daa-45ae-990b-0d27a17e47e0
lrwxrwxrwx vdsm kvm ?mastersd -

/rhev/data-center/mnt/10.3.0.248:_mnt_mainstorage_mainstorage_MainStorage_MS/340dad49-2ec7-475e-b6c6-668504bdb5b1

The one I am having the problem with is the one in red. It is an
openfiler server called ruth. I can add it just fine create disks
but cannot start a VM. It is weird. Again it is a NFS datacenter
this is a data domain not master data domain.

Thanks,

Dominic

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Moran Goldboim
mgold...@redhat.com mailto:mgold...@redhat.com wrote:

On 03/10/2012 01:26 AM, Dominic Kaiser wrote:

Here is the error I am getting:

VM fs1 is down. Exit message internal error process exited
while connecting to monitor: qemu-kvm: -drive

file=/rhev/data-center/c10c25e0-526a-11e1-a5e4-87fa674ffb5d/651cb693-3ffa-43b6-ab49-43cfb03d179b/images/7fa8a2e7-214e-4081-9f1f-f78c88b2f96e/49c199b6-cbda-4aa0-9b50-e3dc28341e09,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,format=raw,serial=81-9f1f-f78c88b2f96e,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop,aio=threads:
could not open disk image

/rhev/data-center/c10c25e0-526a-11e1-a5e4-87fa674ffb5d/651cb693-3ffa-43b6-ab49-43cfb03d179b/images/7fa8a2e7-214e-4081-9f1f-f78c88b2f96e/49c199b6-cbda-4aa0-9b50-e3dc28341e09:
Permission denied .

I can add the domain fine. it is not the master domain and
it is another node. I can create virtual disks but cannot
start vm's. I saw a post on google that mentions nfs=0 not
nfs=1 i think it was in /usr/sbin/senforce maybe? Does
anyone recollect this problem and can help me? Again this is
on a separate node and is a standard data domain not master.

Thanks,

--
Dominic Kaiser

Greater Boston Vineyard
Director of Operations

cell: 617-230-1412 tel:617-230-1412
fax: 617-252-0238 tel:617-252-0238
email: domi...@bostonvineyard.org
mailto:domi...@bostonvineyard.org

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org mailto:Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Dominic, sounds like you have some permission problem with the
image, can you try with selinux in permissive mode -
/usr/sbin/setenforce 0
can you please add the output of ls -lZh

/rhev/data-center/c10c25e0-526a-11e1-a5e4-87fa674ffb5d/651cb693-3ffa-43b6-ab49-43cfb03d179b/images/7fa8a2e7-214e-4081-9f1f-f78c88b2f96e/49c199b6-cbda-4aa0-9b50-e3dc28341e09

Moran.

--
Dominic Kaiser

Greater Boston Vineyard
Director of Operations

cell: 617-230-1412 tel:617-230-1412
fax: 617-252-0238 tel:617-252-0238
email: domi...@bostonvineyard.org mailto:domi...@bostonvineyard.org

--
Dominic Kaiser
Greater Boston Vineyard
Director of Operations

cell: 617-230-1412
fax: 617-252-0238
email: domi...@bostonvineyard.org mailto:domi...@bostonvineyard.org

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] accessing console from firefox.

2012-03-12 Thread Moran Goldboim

 vmGetStats 
with {'status': {'message': 'Done', 'code': 0}, 'statsList': 
[{'status': 'Down', 'hash': '0', 'exitMessage': 'internal error 
Process exited while reading console log output: Supported machines 
are:\npc RHEL 6.2.0 PC (alias of rhel6.2.0)\nrhel6.2.0  RHEL 
6.2.0 PC (default)\nrhel6.1.0  RHEL 6.1.0 PC\nrhel6.0.0  RHEL 6.0.0 
PC\nrhel5.5.0  RHEL 5.5.0 PC\nrhel5.4.4  RHEL 5.4.4 PC\nrhel5.4.0  
RHEL 5.4.0 PC\n', 'vmId': 'bd7c2e08-1ec1-4c6c-9029-b2d9bb4b2c16', 
'timeOffset': '0', 'exitCode': 1}]}


**




On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Moran Goldboim mgold...@redhat.com 
mailto:mgold...@redhat.com wrote:


Kumar, looks like you have a problem with this vm run itself (vm
Ubuntu running in db and not running in vds), can you please
attach vdsm logs from running host.
I think libvirt has some problems running with cpuType=Westmere,,
try you lower your level of cpu in the cluster to Nehalem and see
if it helps.

Moran.


On 03/09/2012 06:55 PM, kumar shantanu wrote:

Just to add , I am getting these error message in ovirt engine log.

2012-03-09 22:18:55,228 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo]

(QuartzScheduler_Worker-42) Running on vds during rerun failed
vm: null
2012-03-09 22:18:55,232 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo]

(QuartzScheduler_Worker-42) vm Ubuntu running in db and not
running in vds - add to rerun treatment. vds Local
2012-03-09 22:18:55,253 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo]
(QuartzScheduler_Worker-42) Rerun vm
bd7c2e08-1ec1-4c6c-9029-b2d9bb4b2c16. Called from vds Local
2012-03-09 22:18:55,257 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.UpdateVdsDynamicDataVDSCommand]

(pool-5-thread-50) START, UpdateVdsDynamicDataVDSCommand(vdsId =
2d40ef8c-69e7-11e1-8c9c-27e55c9bdd2f,

vdsDynamic=org.ovirt.engine.core.common.businessentities.VdsDynamic@ab1ce897),
log id: 6b59dd0c
2012-03-09 22:18:55,262 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.UpdateVdsDynamicDataVDSCommand]

(pool-5-thread-50) FINISH, UpdateVdsDynamicDataVDSCommand, log
id: 6b59dd0c
2012-03-09 22:18:55,285 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsValidVDSCommand]

(pool-5-thread-50) START, IsValidVDSCommand(storagePoolId =
9c3672b4-69e6-11e1-90e5-cf93ece78b91, ignoreFailoverLimit =
false, compatabilityVersion = null), log id: 6d43f31
2012-03-09 22:18:55,287 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsValidVDSCommand]

(pool-5-thread-50) FINISH, IsValidVDSCommand, return: true, log
id: 6d43f31
2012-03-09 22:18:55,339 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand]

(pool-5-thread-50) START, IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand(vmId =
bd7c2e08-1ec1-4c6c-9029-b2d9bb4b2c16), log id: 76e8162b
2012-03-09 22:18:55,340 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand]

(pool-5-thread-50) FINISH, IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand,
return: false, log id: 76e8162b
2012-03-09 22:18:55,342 WARN 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunVmOnceCommand] (pool-5-thread-50)

CanDoAction of action RunVmOnce failed.

Reasons:VAR__ACTION__RUN,VAR__TYPE__VM,VAR__ACTION__RUN,VAR__TYPE__VM,ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_VDS_VM_CLUSTER
2012-03-09 22:19:49,601 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsValidVDSCommand]

(http--0.0.0.0-8443-3) START, IsValidVDSCommand(storagePoolId =
9c3672b4-69e6-11e1-90e5-cf93ece78b91, ignoreFailoverLimit =
false, compatabilityVersion = null), log id: 2cb8b75f
2012-03-09 22:19:49,602 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsValidVDSCommand]

(http--0.0.0.0-8443-3) FINISH, IsValidVDSCommand, return: true,
log id: 2cb8b75f
2012-03-09 22:19:49,641 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand]

(http--0.0.0.0-8443-3) START, IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand(vmId
= bd7c2e08-1ec1-4c6c-9029-b2d9bb4b2c16), log id: 70fdec7a
2012-03-09 22:19:49,642 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand]

(http--0.0.0.0-8443-3) FINISH, IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand,
return: false, log id: 70fdec7a
2012-03-09 22:19:49,691 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunVmCommand] (pool-5-thread-50)

[6b8a595] Running command: RunVmCommand internal: false. Entities
affected :  ID: bd7c2e08-1ec1-4c6c-9029-b2d9bb4b2c16 Type: VM
2012-03-09 22:19:49,708 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsoPrefixVDSCommand]

(pool-5-thread-50) [6b8a595] START,
IsoPrefixVDSCommand(storagePoolId =
9c3672b4-69e6-11e1-90e5-cf93ece78b91, ignoreFailoverLimit =
false, compatabilityVersion = null), log id: 2f19c35
2012-03-09 22:19:49,708 INFO 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsoPrefixVDSCommand]

(pool-5-thread-50) [6b8a595] FINISH, IsoPrefixVDSCommand, return:

/rhev/data

Re: [Users] accessing console from firefox.

2012-03-11 Thread Moran Goldboim

Kumar, looks like you have a problem with this vm run itself (vm Ubuntu 
running in db and not running in vds), can you please attach vdsm logs 
from running host.
I think libvirt has some problems running with cpuType=Westmere,, try 
you lower your level of cpu in the cluster to Nehalem and see if it helps.


Moran.

On 03/09/2012 06:55 PM, kumar shantanu wrote:

Just to add , I am getting these error message in ovirt engine log.

2012-03-09 22:18:55,228 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo] 
(QuartzScheduler_Worker-42) Running on vds during rerun failed vm: null
2012-03-09 22:18:55,232 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo] 
(QuartzScheduler_Worker-42) vm Ubuntu running in db and not running in 
vds - add to rerun treatment. vds Local
2012-03-09 22:18:55,253 ERROR 
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo] 
(QuartzScheduler_Worker-42) Rerun vm 
bd7c2e08-1ec1-4c6c-9029-b2d9bb4b2c16. Called from vds Local
2012-03-09 22:18:55,257 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.UpdateVdsDynamicDataVDSCommand] 
(pool-5-thread-50) START, UpdateVdsDynamicDataVDSCommand(vdsId = 
2d40ef8c-69e7-11e1-8c9c-27e55c9bdd2f, 
vdsDynamic=org.ovirt.engine.core.common.businessentities.VdsDynamic@ab1ce897), 
log id: 6b59dd0c
2012-03-09 22:18:55,262 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.UpdateVdsDynamicDataVDSCommand] 
(pool-5-thread-50) FINISH, UpdateVdsDynamicDataVDSCommand, log id: 
6b59dd0c
2012-03-09 22:18:55,285 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsValidVDSCommand] 
(pool-5-thread-50) START, IsValidVDSCommand(storagePoolId = 
9c3672b4-69e6-11e1-90e5-cf93ece78b91, ignoreFailoverLimit = false, 
compatabilityVersion = null), log id: 6d43f31
2012-03-09 22:18:55,287 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsValidVDSCommand] 
(pool-5-thread-50) FINISH, IsValidVDSCommand, return: true, log id: 
6d43f31
2012-03-09 22:18:55,339 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand] 
(pool-5-thread-50) START, IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand(vmId = 
bd7c2e08-1ec1-4c6c-9029-b2d9bb4b2c16), log id: 76e8162b
2012-03-09 22:18:55,340 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand] 
(pool-5-thread-50) FINISH, IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand, return: 
false, log id: 76e8162b
2012-03-09 22:18:55,342 WARN  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunVmOnceCommand] (pool-5-thread-50) 
CanDoAction of action RunVmOnce failed. 
Reasons:VAR__ACTION__RUN,VAR__TYPE__VM,VAR__ACTION__RUN,VAR__TYPE__VM,ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_VDS_VM_CLUSTER
2012-03-09 22:19:49,601 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsValidVDSCommand] 
(http--0.0.0.0-8443-3) START, IsValidVDSCommand(storagePoolId = 
9c3672b4-69e6-11e1-90e5-cf93ece78b91, ignoreFailoverLimit = false, 
compatabilityVersion = null), log id: 2cb8b75f
2012-03-09 22:19:49,602 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsValidVDSCommand] 
(http--0.0.0.0-8443-3) FINISH, IsValidVDSCommand, return: true, log 
id: 2cb8b75f
2012-03-09 22:19:49,641 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand] 
(http--0.0.0.0-8443-3) START, IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand(vmId = 
bd7c2e08-1ec1-4c6c-9029-b2d9bb4b2c16), log id: 70fdec7a
2012-03-09 22:19:49,642 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand] 
(http--0.0.0.0-8443-3) FINISH, IsVmDuringInitiatingVDSCommand, return: 
false, log id: 70fdec7a
2012-03-09 22:19:49,691 INFO  [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RunVmCommand] 
(pool-5-thread-50) [6b8a595] Running command: RunVmCommand internal: 
false. Entities affected :  ID: bd7c2e08-1ec1-4c6c-9029-b2d9bb4b2c16 
Type: VM
2012-03-09 22:19:49,708 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsoPrefixVDSCommand] 
(pool-5-thread-50) [6b8a595] START, IsoPrefixVDSCommand(storagePoolId 
= 9c3672b4-69e6-11e1-90e5-cf93ece78b91, ignoreFailoverLimit = false, 
compatabilityVersion = null), log id: 2f19c35
2012-03-09 22:19:49,708 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IsoPrefixVDSCommand] 
(pool-5-thread-50) [6b8a595] FINISH, IsoPrefixVDSCommand, return: 
/rhev/data-center/9c3672b4-69e6-11e1-90e5-cf93ece78b91/4d313edd-4904-44de-b761-d828c36d6116/images/----, 
log id: 2f19c35
2012-03-09 22:19:49,709 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.CreateVmVDSCommand] 
(pool-5-thread-50) [6b8a595] START, CreateVmVDSCommand(vdsId = 
2d40ef8c-69e7-11e1-8c9c-27e55c9bdd2f, 
vmId=bd7c2e08-1ec1-4c6c-9029-b2d9bb4b2c16, 
vm=org.ovirt.engine.core.common.businessentities.VM@1aa2def), log id: 
3111b59c
2012-03-09 22:19:49,714 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.CreateVDSCommand] 
(pool-5-thread-50) [6b8a595] START, CreateVDSCommand(vdsId = 
2d40ef8c-69e7-11e1-8c9c-27e55c9bdd2f, 
vmId=bd7c2e08-1ec1-4c6c-9029-b2d9bb4b2c16, 
vm=org.ovirt.engine.core.common.businessentities.VM@1aa2def), log id: 
78110a1
2012-03-09 22:19:49,732 INFO  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.CreateVDSCommand] 
(pool-5-thread-50) [6b8a595]

Re: [Users] permission settings on the specified path do not allow access to the storage

2012-03-07 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 03/06/2012 05:17 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
The problem was resloved  and It might come from the naming problem 
using 'data' as domain name.


can you please elaborate - i don't know such a limitation, anyhow the 
error shows a permission problem if this isn't the case we should handle it.

Moran.


On 2012-3-6 22:55, Xiaofan wrote:

Manually mount and touch with kvm:qemu user/group and see if success?

2012/3/6 Shu Mingshum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:

It seems that the problem came from the name of the data domain to be
created.  I used data to be the name.  Is data a reserved name 
for the

storage domain?


On 2012-3-6 17:30, Shu Ming wrote:

Hi,
  My ovirt-engine was setup on a vm host with ip:xxx.xxx.xxx.112.  
And I am
trying to create a new domain with ovirt-engine UI  by the 
Storage--  New

Domain.  And the following error happened.  However I can mount the
  xxx.xxx.xxx.110:/data by mount -t nfs xxx.xxx.xxx.110:/data 
/mnt manually
in the ovirt-engine host, also a new file can be created under the 
mounted

directory with touch xx.  It looks to me that there is no permission
problem when I access the remote nfs path manually.  So does 
ovirt-engine
enforce additional permission check beside the normal unix file 
permission

check here?


[root@ovirt-engine-112 /]# vim /var/log/ovirt-engine/engine.log
[root@ovirt-engine-112 /]# vim /var/log/ovirt-engine/engine.log
2012-03-06 00:38:51,165 INFO
  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.ValidateStorageServerConnectionVDSCommand]

(http--0.0.0.0-8080-6) START,
ValidateStorageServerConnectionVDSCommand(vdsId =
46a83d56-66d9-11e1-8004-5254009e821b, storagePoolId =
----, storageType = NFS, 
connectionList = [{

id: null, connection: xxx.xxx.xxx.110:/data };]), log id: 1899002d
2012-03-06 00:38:51,297 INFO
  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.ValidateStorageServerConnectionVDSCommand]
(http--0.0.0.0-8080-6) FINISH, 
ValidateStorageServerConnectionVDSCommand,

return: {----=469}, log id: 1899002d
2012-03-06 00:38:51,300 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.NFSStorageHelper] 
(http--0.0.0.0-8080-6)
The connection with details xxx.xxx.xxx.110:/data failed because of 
error
code 469 and error message is: permission settings on the specified 
path do

not allow access to the storage.
verify permission settings on the specified storage path.
2012-03-06 00:38:51,300 WARN
  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.AddStorageServerConnectionCommand]
(http--0.0.0.0-8080-6) CanDoAction of action 
AddStorageServerConnection

failed. Reasons:ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_STORAGE_CONNECTION
2012-03-06 00:38:51,425 INFO
  
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.RemoveStorageServerConnectionCommand] 

(http--0.0.0.0-8080-4) Running command: 
RemoveStorageServerConnectionCommand

internal: false. Entities affected :  ID:
aaa0----123456789aaa Type: System



--
Shu Mingshum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
IBM China Systems and Technology Laboratory


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users





___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Host discovery failing due to host network being lost

2012-01-31 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 01/31/2012 05:09 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:

On 01/31/2012 04:55 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:

Hi Itamar,
My reply with the attachments is on hold since the size is around 114KB
I tried with and without .tar, the same happens, so not sure how to send
the attachments
otherwise to this email thread.



1. i got it, since you cc'd me directly.
2. karsten - can we change the limit on users@ovirt.org to something 
in MBs?


thanks
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Deepak, can you please look for SetVdsStatusVDSCommand following a 
MaintananceVdsCommand in /var/log/ovirt-engine/engine.log
if you were having a problem with this command it is most likely for an 
ERROR to appear around there.


Moran.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] test day: using VM has host for vdsm

2012-01-18 Thread Moran Goldboim


On 01/18/2012 11:13 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:

* Itamar Heimih...@redhat.com  [2012-01-18 13:46]:

On 01/18/2012 07:26 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:

* Ryan Harperry...@us.ibm.com   [2012-01-18 06:59]:

I've created some f16 VMs that contain both ovirt-engine and a few
to run vdsm as nodes.  When I add in the VM host into the engine and it
attempts to install vdsm (even though I've already installed vdsm) the
install fails because the vdsm install script is checking to see if the
host has virt capabilities; since I'm not running nested KVM, this
fails.  Is there a way to work around this can enable a VM to be a host
in oVirt?  I had heard in the past there was a way to create fake VMs
when attempting to do ovirt-engine stress testing, wondering if that
might be of help here.

Now that I have one VM as a host in the UP state in ovirt-engine, let me
capture what I needed to get that to work:


On my F16-node, since I was following the test day instructions which
asked to install vdsm/vdsm-cli and this is already done by ovirt-engine
bootstrap.

1) uninstall vdsm and vdsm-cli
 - ovirt-engine will push down a vdsm package during the bootstrap
 process

2) disable selinux
 - edit /etc/sysconfig/selinux and set SELINUX=disabled
 - reboot

3) ensure ssl=false and fake_kvm_support=true in /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf

4) restart vdsmd


On the ovirt-engine instanes

# we have a gateway in the way so we're using ssh tunneling to access
# the ovirt-engine VM instance

1) re-install ovirt-engine and don't use localhost as the hostname since
this value is passed to the host you install vdsm on and it will fail to
push the bootstrap script down.  This means that after you setup your
tunnel, to get to the admin interface, you need to manually enter:

 http://localhost:8080/webadmin

2) edit
/usr/share/ovirt-engine/engine.ear/components.war/vds/vds_bootstrap.py
and comment out lines 836-839, like this.

#if not oDeploy.virtExplorer(random_num):
#logging.error('virtExplorer test failed')
#return False

3) some misc stuff (not sure if it is needed, but looks harmless enough)

mkdir  /var/lock/ovirt-engine/
chown  jboss-as:jboss-as -R /var/lock/ovirt-engine
restorecon -Fvv  /var/lock/ovirt-engine

4) update jboss configuration to not use ssl

psql -U postgres engine -c update vdc_options set option_value='false'
where
+option_name='UseSecureConnectionWithServers' and version='general';

5) restart jboss

service restart jboss-as


Also, are their vdsm rpms built for RHEL6.x available?

you can set InstallVds to false in engine config, which will only add

what does this command look like?  I plan to update the installing vdsm
wiki page.


Itamar, i think this value is missing on engine-config - will look into 
it tomorrow:

engine-config -l | grep -i install
oVirtISOsRepositoryPath: The RHEV-H installation files path (Value 
Type: String)
VdcBootStrapUrl: Host Installation Bootstrap Script URL (Value Type: 
String)


Ryan, you can change it on DB:
UPDATE vdc_options SET option_value = false where option_name = 
'InstallVds';


Moran.



the host without doing any communication to it.
together with disabling ssl/secure connections should be easy enough to use.
you would need to install vdsm manually and configure the ovirtmgmt bridge.

That sounds good; it'd probably be good to mention that on the
installing VDSM page which walks folks through installing vdsm.





___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

40 matches

Mail list logo