Re: How to deal with bounce messages
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 03:48:01PM +0300, Henrik K wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 02:21:49PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > > KAM.cf has already all the needed glue, if you update to trunk and enable > > DMARC plugin, DMARC rules will use new plugin code. > > Giovannin > > KAM.cf is not from SA project, not everyone uses it.. the DMARC stuff > should be implemented in stock rules for 4.0.0. Committed to stock rules: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rules/25_dmarc.cf Please someone double check that it looks usable, my covid brain can only do so much right now. Automatic updates are still on pause for a few days due to welcomelist changes, so it's not going live yet. Trunk is getting very near to 4.0.0 pre-releases, so if people could actually install and test it, would be great..
Re: How to deal with bounce messages
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 02:21:49PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:50:49PM +0300, Henrik K wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:48:52AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > > > >> >https://pastebin.com/s032ndrA > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >It's not only hitting DMARC_REJ_NO_DKIM and DMARC_FAIL_REJECT, but > > > > > >> > > > > > >> where did you get these from? > > > > > > > > > > On 22.04.22 10:02, Alex wrote: > > > > > >I just realized these are from my local rules, put together from a > > > > > >conversation many years ago, apparently from before SA had built-in > > > > > >DMARC support. > > > > > > > > > > > >https://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg95643.html > > > > > > > > now I really wonder why these aren't part of stock SA rules. > > > > > > On 24.04.22 14:39, Alex wrote: > > > > Does this mean you are investigating further? > > > > > > not me, as I'm not involved in SA deployment more than by being active > > > here. > > > perhaps you could fill a wishlist report... > > > > > > > Are these rules from the link above useful? > > > > > > looks like they are. KAM.cf contains similar rules, but having them in > > > stock > > > SA would be nice. > > > > Soon released 4.0.0 already has a dedicated DMARC plugin, such rules should > > become obsolete. Testers would be appreciated.. > > > KAM.cf has already all the needed glue, if you update to trunk and enable > DMARC plugin, DMARC rules will use new plugin code. > Giovannin KAM.cf is not from SA project, not everyone uses it.. the DMARC stuff should be implemented in stock rules for 4.0.0.
Re: How to deal with bounce messages
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:50:49PM +0300, Henrik K wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:48:52AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > > >> >https://pastebin.com/s032ndrA > > > > >> > > > > > >> >It's not only hitting DMARC_REJ_NO_DKIM and DMARC_FAIL_REJECT, but > > > > >> > > > > >> where did you get these from? > > > > > > > > On 22.04.22 10:02, Alex wrote: > > > > >I just realized these are from my local rules, put together from a > > > > >conversation many years ago, apparently from before SA had built-in > > > > >DMARC support. > > > > > > > > > >https://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg95643.html > > > > > > now I really wonder why these aren't part of stock SA rules. > > > > On 24.04.22 14:39, Alex wrote: > > > Does this mean you are investigating further? > > > > not me, as I'm not involved in SA deployment more than by being active here. > > perhaps you could fill a wishlist report... > > > > > Are these rules from the link above useful? > > > > looks like they are. KAM.cf contains similar rules, but having them in stock > > SA would be nice. > > Soon released 4.0.0 already has a dedicated DMARC plugin, such rules should > become obsolete. Testers would be appreciated.. > KAM.cf has already all the needed glue, if you update to trunk and enable DMARC plugin, DMARC rules will use new plugin code. Giovannin
Re: How to deal with bounce messages
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:48:52AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > >> >https://pastebin.com/s032ndrA > > > >> > > > > >> >It's not only hitting DMARC_REJ_NO_DKIM and DMARC_FAIL_REJECT, but > > > >> > > > >> where did you get these from? > > > > > > On 22.04.22 10:02, Alex wrote: > > > >I just realized these are from my local rules, put together from a > > > >conversation many years ago, apparently from before SA had built-in > > > >DMARC support. > > > > > > > >https://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg95643.html > > > > now I really wonder why these aren't part of stock SA rules. > > On 24.04.22 14:39, Alex wrote: > > Does this mean you are investigating further? > > not me, as I'm not involved in SA deployment more than by being active here. > perhaps you could fill a wishlist report... > > > Are these rules from the link above useful? > > looks like they are. KAM.cf contains similar rules, but having them in stock > SA would be nice. Soon released 4.0.0 already has a dedicated DMARC plugin, such rules should become obsolete. Testers would be appreciated..
Re: How to deal with bounce messages
>> >https://pastebin.com/s032ndrA >> > >> >It's not only hitting DMARC_REJ_NO_DKIM and DMARC_FAIL_REJECT, but >> >> where did you get these from? On 22.04.22 10:02, Alex wrote: >I just realized these are from my local rules, put together from a >conversation many years ago, apparently from before SA had built-in >DMARC support. > >https://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg95643.html now I really wonder why these aren't part of stock SA rules. On 24.04.22 14:39, Alex wrote: Does this mean you are investigating further? not me, as I'm not involved in SA deployment more than by being active here. perhaps you could fill a wishlist report... Are these rules from the link above useful? looks like they are. KAM.cf contains similar rules, but having them in stock SA would be nice. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Due to unexpected conditions Windows 2000 will be released in first quarter of year 1901
