SV: SV: Wicket and portlets JSR 286
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Payload has not the right class at org.apache.jetspeed.events.EventCoordinationServiceImpl.createEvent(Eve ntCoordinationServiceImpl.java:98) This is the portlet container complaining about: ReportType report = new ReportType(); report.setReportPath(SomePath); response.setEvent(qname, report); Keep in mind that the XML event definition declares both the qualified name and the payload class; Jetspeed apparently checks that the object is of the declared type. What is your event definition? - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: SV: SV: Wicket and portlets JSR 286
In fact, I tried to send String as events, and I got the same error. Finally I found that I had to use the full name for the String class java.lang.String . event-definition qname xmlns:x=http://example.com;x:ReportName/qname value-typejava.lang.String/value-type /event-definition It's working now. Thank you. On Wed Jan 06,2010 11:04 am, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver wrote: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Payload has not the right class at org.apache.jetspeed.events.EventCoordinationServiceImpl.createEvent(Eve ntCoordinationServiceImpl.java:98) This is the portlet container complaining about: ReportType report = new ReportType(); report.setReportPath(SomePath); response.setEvent(qname, report); Keep in mind that the XML event definition declares both the qualified name and the payload class; Jetspeed apparently checks that the object is of the declared type. What is your event definition? - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
How to iterate over checkboxes?
Hey, I have AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable and I want to add a check box at the end of each row to enable a batch operation. Upon clicking Send button, how to iterate over the check boxes and gets the object associated with it? Thanks for help and time. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to iterate over checkboxes?
Maybe iterate the datatable items? ** Martin 2010/1/6 HB hubaghd...@yahoo.ca: Hey, I have AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable and I want to add a check box at the end of each row to enable a batch operation. Upon clicking Send button, how to iterate over the check boxes and gets the object associated with it? Thanks for help and time. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: question about swarm
Hi,
Your change breaks some functionality. It is now no longer possible to grant
permissions for anonymous inner classes at all, you are now forced to grant
the permission on the superclass. This might seem sensible when using a hive
file, but it is not when permissions are configured in other ways.
We create permissions by annotating components with an @InPrincipal
annotation. It is possible to create a (abstract) component and have multiple,
anonymous subclasses, each with their own @InPrincipal annotation.
I think, this should be fixed with a special ComponentPermission: one that
does not only give permission to the specified class, but also to its
subclasses. This could be achieved by extending ComponentPermission and
overriding the implies method. The first part of the the path array should
contain the classname of the component.
Best regards,
Emond Papegaaij
On Thursday 31 December 2009 23:31:34 Olger Warnier wrote:
Hi Sam,
Found the way to solve it. It is fixed in the trunk. Still need to fix the
build server - so a check out and build of the whole is probably best. An
anonymous class will act like its' parent now.
Happy new year (to you all).
Olger
On 31 dec 2009, at 22:43, s...@sambarrow.com wrote:
In my opinion, that's how it should work; just seems like common sense to
me. Even for regular (non-anonymous) classes, it would be useful although
that's not as important.
As far as the technical part I have no idea. I've only been working with
swam for 3 days. But I will do some looking at the source code.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Olger Warnier ol...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:35:22
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I agree, it is quite fragile
- I had a look at the code that does the checks. I could 'assume' that an
anonymous class needs the same rights as the 'normal' class. so when your
CreateItemPage has the proper rights, an anonymous variant has the
similar rights.
The other way is some kind of inheritance assumption. This needs some
kind of syntax in the hive file like the 'inherit' that is currently
available. This inherit is more page with child component 'inheritance'
and not like in OO thinking (If understand this completely). With this in
mind, I would say that treating an anonymous class as the class it
'extends' may be the best. I tried to figure out how to recognize an
anonymous class. It seems that Class.getSimpleName = or a search to
$[0-9] in getName is a solution but it seems risky when you use a non-sun
JVM.
What do you think ?
Kind Regards,
Olger
On 31 dec 2009, at 10:53, Sam Barrow wrote:
I know I can do that, but there's no way do do it by inheritance? I have
hundreds of anonymous subclasses throughout my application. Seems
sensible that subclasses should inherit their parent's permissions.
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 10:41 +0100, Olger Warnier wrote:
Hi Sam,
I have added a sample to the secureform sample where the home page
creates an anonymous class of the MySecurePage An anonymous page has a
kind of a class name. Look for a
ERROR - RequestCycle - Not authorized to instantiate
class org.apache.wicket.security.examples.secureform.pages.HomePage$2$1
org.apache.wicket.authorization.UnauthorizedInstantiationException: Not
authorized to instantiate class
org.apache.wicket.security.examples.secureform.pages.HomePage$2$1
And add the line to the hive:
permission ${ComponentPermission}
org.apache.wicket.security.examples.secureform.pages.HomePage$2$1,
render, enable;
As you can see it does not contain a line with the target response page
but a line that contains the setResponsePage call. So you need to add a
line that contains the 'name' of the anonymous class to the hive.
Kind Regards,
Olger
On 31 dec 2009, at 02:46, Sam Barrow wrote:
I hope this is the right list for wasp/swarm.
How do i manage permissions for an anonymous subclass?
I have a page called ItemPage. I can view ItemPage, but if I try to
redirect to an anonymous subclass of ItemPage, i get an access denied
error.
this works:
setResponsePage(new CreateItemPage(getPage()));
but this doesnt:
setResponsePage(new CreateItemPage(getPage()) {
@Override
protected void onSuccess(final Serializable index) {
setResponsePage(new ViewItemPage(getBackPage(), index));
}
});
hive file:
permission ${ComponentPermission} ${pages}.CreateItemPage, inherit,
render;
permission ${ComponentPermission} ${pages}.CreateItemPage, enable;
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: question about swarm
Hi Emond,
Thanks for your comments, Interesting matter. Extending ComponentPermission to
change the behavior sounds like an option.
I can't find the @InPrincipal annotation in the wicket-security project, is
this something specific ?
When you look at it from the 'hive' side: It is the standard way of working
with Swarm/Wasp, isn't it ?
That current way has a quite fragile way to define the authorization rules on
anonymous inner classes.
How to deal with that ?
Is it an option to contribute your annotations with a specific
AnnotatedPermission ? That would be really great.
Kind Regards,
Olger
On 6 jan 2010, at 12:52, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
Hi,
Your change breaks some functionality. It is now no longer possible to grant
permissions for anonymous inner classes at all, you are now forced to grant
the permission on the superclass. This might seem sensible when using a hive
file, but it is not when permissions are configured in other ways.
We create permissions by annotating components with an @InPrincipal
annotation. It is possible to create a (abstract) component and have
multiple,
anonymous subclasses, each with their own @InPrincipal annotation.
I think, this should be fixed with a special ComponentPermission: one that
does not only give permission to the specified class, but also to its
subclasses. This could be achieved by extending ComponentPermission and
overriding the implies method. The first part of the the path array should
contain the classname of the component.
Best regards,
Emond Papegaaij
On Thursday 31 December 2009 23:31:34 Olger Warnier wrote:
Hi Sam,
Found the way to solve it. It is fixed in the trunk. Still need to fix the
build server - so a check out and build of the whole is probably best. An
anonymous class will act like its' parent now.
Happy new year (to you all).
Olger
On 31 dec 2009, at 22:43, s...@sambarrow.com wrote:
In my opinion, that's how it should work; just seems like common sense to
me. Even for regular (non-anonymous) classes, it would be useful although
that's not as important.
As far as the technical part I have no idea. I've only been working with
swam for 3 days. But I will do some looking at the source code.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Olger Warnier ol...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:35:22
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I agree, it is quite fragile
- I had a look at the code that does the checks. I could 'assume' that an
anonymous class needs the same rights as the 'normal' class. so when your
CreateItemPage has the proper rights, an anonymous variant has the
similar rights.
The other way is some kind of inheritance assumption. This needs some
kind of syntax in the hive file like the 'inherit' that is currently
available. This inherit is more page with child component 'inheritance'
and not like in OO thinking (If understand this completely). With this in
mind, I would say that treating an anonymous class as the class it
'extends' may be the best. I tried to figure out how to recognize an
anonymous class. It seems that Class.getSimpleName = or a search to
$[0-9] in getName is a solution but it seems risky when you use a non-sun
JVM.
What do you think ?
Kind Regards,
Olger
On 31 dec 2009, at 10:53, Sam Barrow wrote:
I know I can do that, but there's no way do do it by inheritance? I have
hundreds of anonymous subclasses throughout my application. Seems
sensible that subclasses should inherit their parent's permissions.
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 10:41 +0100, Olger Warnier wrote:
Hi Sam,
I have added a sample to the secureform sample where the home page
creates an anonymous class of the MySecurePage An anonymous page has a
kind of a class name. Look for a
ERROR - RequestCycle - Not authorized to instantiate
class org.apache.wicket.security.examples.secureform.pages.HomePage$2$1
org.apache.wicket.authorization.UnauthorizedInstantiationException: Not
authorized to instantiate class
org.apache.wicket.security.examples.secureform.pages.HomePage$2$1
And add the line to the hive:
permission ${ComponentPermission}
org.apache.wicket.security.examples.secureform.pages.HomePage$2$1,
render, enable;
As you can see it does not contain a line with the target response page
but a line that contains the setResponsePage call. So you need to add a
line that contains the 'name' of the anonymous class to the hive.
Kind Regards,
Olger
On 31 dec 2009, at 02:46, Sam Barrow wrote:
I hope this is the right list for wasp/swarm.
How do i manage permissions for an anonymous subclass?
I have a page called ItemPage. I can view ItemPage, but if I try to
redirect to an anonymous subclass of ItemPage, i get an access denied
error.
this works:
setResponsePage(new CreateItemPage(getPage()));
RE: how to iterate over checkboxes?
I think you got me wrong. There is a check box at the end of each row of AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable. Upon click a button, I want to iterate over the checkboxes and collects the objects associated with them. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
DropDownBox should render as a label if only one choice is available
Hi, I want a DropDownBox which renders as a Label if only one Choice is available. I wrote a LabelDropDownPanel which you can see here http://pastie.org/768613 (is it ok to use pastie here?) My problem is, that the list of choices sometimes depends on another form Component. if i change this form component the choices of my dropdownlist should change too. It works fine with a normal dropdownChoice, beacuse the ChoiceModel and the other FormComponent share a common ModelObject. if i use my LabelDropDownPanel is does not work. The method isVisible() in my LabelDropDownPanel is called BEFORE the new input values from the other FormComponent are pushed into my model. So this method attaches the choices with the old value. I wonder why isVisible is called before pushing the values from form submission. I don't know how to solve my problem, but i am quite new to wicket, so please help me. kind regards Janning - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: how to iterate over checkboxes?
So why can't you iterate the elements in the data table? 2010/1/6 HB hubaghd...@yahoo.ca: I think you got me wrong. There is a check box at the end of each row of AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable. Upon click a button, I want to iterate over the checkboxes and collects the objects associated with them. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: how to iterate over checkboxes?
How to iterate over the data table items? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: how to iterate over checkboxes?
getItems().iterator()... 2010/1/6 HB hubaghd...@yahoo.ca: How to iterate over the data table items? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDownChoice losing selection after ajax update
There can be many reasons... maybe you show more of the html and java
pages? Here is some previous discussion about such situations:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-users/200904.mbox/%3c23274595.p...@talk.nabble.com%3e
2010/1/6 Kogel, Jonck-van-der jonck-van-der.ko...@bmw.nl:
Hi,
I have a simple DropDownChoice that holds male/female option. The
selected value is retrieved from the database fine. Now I have a modal
panel and when it closes it refreshes a certain portion of my screen
using ajax. However, when the ajax refresh comes back the selected value
gets lost. When I look in the ajax debug screen I see the list of
options coming back and the selected value is empty. This happens even
when I don't do anything with the value of the dropdown in the modal
panel, but simply refresh the dropdown. Any ideas? Here is some code:
The dropdown: (the list of options is an enum, mergedModel is a
LoadableDetatchableModel)
DropDownChoiceSex sex = new DropDownChoiceSex(sex,
new PropertyModelSex(mergedModel, user.sex),
Utility.arrayToList(new Sex[]{Sex.MALE, Sex.FEMALE}));
sex.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(sex);
What happens when I close the modal panel: (the contentPanel gets passed
a reference to the modalPanel and the objects that need refreshing)
form.add(new AjaxSubmitLink(save) {
�...@override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form? form) {
for (Component comp : updateList) {
target.addComponent(comp);
}
modalWindow.close(target);
}
});
The ajax response:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent
id=sex11 ![CDATA[select name=tabs:tabUser:sex id=sex11
option selected=selected value=Kies er een/option
option value=0Man/option
option value=1Vrouw/option
/select]]
Thanks for any help!
Kind regards, Jonck
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: how to iterate over checkboxes?
AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable doesn't has a method called getItems() which method you are referring to? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: question about swarm
Hi Olger,
The InPrincipal annotation is something we developed as an alternative for the
hive files (which we find difficult to maintain, not only with anonymous inner
classes). Principals are defined by a set of classes with annotations defining
things like implies relations between principals and DataPermissions.
ComponentPermissions are created by scanning for components with the
InPrincipal annotation and creating the permissions for those. We are thinking
about releasing this code, perhaps by including it in wicket-security.
When using a hive file, you define your principals, each with a set of
permissions. Currently, you can use ComponentPermission, DataPermission and
AllPermissions. My suggestion is to add another permission that gives
permissions to a component and all of its subclasses (including anonymous
classes), something like:
permission ${ComponentSubclassPermission} MyPage, inherit, render;
This would give you permission for MyPage and its subclasses. You can define
the alias for ComponentSubclassPermission in SwarmPolicyFileHiveFactory. I
think that this is the way Swarm/Wasp is 'supposed to be used'.
Best regards,
Emond
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 13:09:09 Olger Warnier wrote:
Hi Emond,
Thanks for your comments, Interesting matter. Extending ComponentPermission
to change the behavior sounds like an option. I can't find the
@InPrincipal annotation in the wicket-security project, is this something
specific ?
When you look at it from the 'hive' side: It is the standard way of working
with Swarm/Wasp, isn't it ? That current way has a quite fragile way to
define the authorization rules on anonymous inner classes. How to deal
with that ?
Is it an option to contribute your annotations with a specific
AnnotatedPermission ? That would be really great.
Kind Regards,
Olger
On 6 jan 2010, at 12:52, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
Hi,
Your change breaks some functionality. It is now no longer possible to
grant permissions for anonymous inner classes at all, you are now forced
to grant the permission on the superclass. This might seem sensible when
using a hive file, but it is not when permissions are configured in other
ways.
We create permissions by annotating components with an @InPrincipal
annotation. It is possible to create a (abstract) component and have
multiple, anonymous subclasses, each with their own @InPrincipal
annotation.
I think, this should be fixed with a special ComponentPermission: one
that does not only give permission to the specified class, but also to
its subclasses. This could be achieved by extending ComponentPermission
and overriding the implies method. The first part of the the path array
should contain the classname of the component.
Best regards,
Emond Papegaaij
On Thursday 31 December 2009 23:31:34 Olger Warnier wrote:
Hi Sam,
Found the way to solve it. It is fixed in the trunk. Still need to fix
the build server - so a check out and build of the whole is probably
best. An anonymous class will act like its' parent now.
Happy new year (to you all).
Olger
On 31 dec 2009, at 22:43, s...@sambarrow.com wrote:
In my opinion, that's how it should work; just seems like common sense
to me. Even for regular (non-anonymous) classes, it would be useful
although that's not as important.
As far as the technical part I have no idea. I've only been working
with swam for 3 days. But I will do some looking at the source code.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Olger Warnier ol...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:35:22
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I agree, it is quite
fragile - I had a look at the code that does the checks. I could
'assume' that an anonymous class needs the same rights as the 'normal'
class. so when your CreateItemPage has the proper rights, an anonymous
variant has the similar rights.
The other way is some kind of inheritance assumption. This needs some
kind of syntax in the hive file like the 'inherit' that is currently
available. This inherit is more page with child component 'inheritance'
and not like in OO thinking (If understand this completely). With this
in mind, I would say that treating an anonymous class as the class it
'extends' may be the best. I tried to figure out how to recognize an
anonymous class. It seems that Class.getSimpleName = or a search to
$[0-9] in getName is a solution but it seems risky when you use a
non-sun JVM.
What do you think ?
Kind Regards,
Olger
On 31 dec 2009, at 10:53, Sam Barrow wrote:
I know I can do that, but there's no way do do it by inheritance? I
have hundreds of anonymous subclasses throughout my application. Seems
sensible that subclasses should inherit their parent's permissions.
On Thu, 2009-12-31
Re: how to iterate over checkboxes?
getColumns() 2010/1/6 HB hubaghd...@yahoo.ca: AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable doesn't has a method called getItems() which method you are referring to? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: how to iterate over checkboxes?
Actually I am not sure, but looking at: datagrid = new DataGridViewT(rows, columns, dataProvider) at least you can iterate the components of the gridview, i.e., gridview.iterator ** Martin 2010/1/6 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: getColumns() 2010/1/6 HB hubaghd...@yahoo.ca: AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable doesn't has a method called getItems() which method you are referring to? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: DropDownChoice losing selection after ajax update
Martin thank you!! It was indeed the form in the ModalWindow causing the error.
I thought that nested forms was not an issue with Wicket but I guess it is?
Anyway, replacing the form on the ModalWindow with the one you suggested works
like a charm. Thanks again!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Makundi [mailto:martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com]
Sent: woensdag 6 januari 2010 14:11
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: DropDownChoice losing selection after ajax update
There can be many reasons... maybe you show more of the html and java pages?
Here is some previous discussion about such situations:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-users/200904.mbox/%3c23274595.p...@talk.nabble.com%3e
2010/1/6 Kogel, Jonck-van-der jonck-van-der.ko...@bmw.nl:
Hi,
I have a simple DropDownChoice that holds male/female option. The
selected value is retrieved from the database fine. Now I have a modal
panel and when it closes it refreshes a certain portion of my screen
using ajax. However, when the ajax refresh comes back the selected
value gets lost. When I look in the ajax debug screen I see the list
of options coming back and the selected value is empty. This happens
even when I don't do anything with the value of the dropdown in the
modal panel, but simply refresh the dropdown. Any ideas? Here is some code:
The dropdown: (the list of options is an enum, mergedModel is a
LoadableDetatchableModel)
DropDownChoiceSex sex = new DropDownChoiceSex(sex,
new PropertyModelSex(mergedModel, user.sex),
Utility.arrayToList(new Sex[]{Sex.MALE, Sex.FEMALE}));
sex.setOutputMarkupId(true); add(sex);
What happens when I close the modal panel: (the contentPanel gets
passed a reference to the modalPanel and the objects that need
refreshing)
form.add(new AjaxSubmitLink(save) {
�...@override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form? form) {
for (Component comp : updateList) {
target.addComponent(comp);
}
modalWindow.close(target);
}
});
The ajax response:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responsecomponent
id=sex11 ![CDATA[select name=tabs:tabUser:sex id=sex11
option selected=selected value=Kies er een/option option
value=0Man/option option value=1Vrouw/option /select]]
Thanks for any help!
Kind regards, Jonck
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
traditional(?) form processing
Hi, I'd like to create traditional form processing in wicket: to direct a form target to a (bookmarkable) page and receive the form content as PageParameters on that page. Is there any easy and supported way to achieve this? E.g. I have a search page that receives the parameters that way, and I'd like to have a form that targets that page with visible input field and a hidden field. With the usual way, I'd create it as part of a stateless form, but I'd like to skip the processing on the old page. Thanks and regards, Istvan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: traditional(?) form processing
form action=/mount/path/to/otherpage method=get input type=text name=q / input type=submit value=Search / /form No wicket required Martijn On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to create traditional form processing in wicket: to direct a form target to a (bookmarkable) page and receive the form content as PageParameters on that page. Is there any easy and supported way to achieve this? E.g. I have a search page that receives the parameters that way, and I'd like to have a form that targets that page with visible input field and a hidden field. With the usual way, I'd create it as part of a stateless form, but I'd like to skip the processing on the old page. Thanks and regards, Istvan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: traditional(?) form processing
Okay, this was too easy... :) what is the best way to populate the form's action attribute? Regards, Istvan On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: form action=/mount/path/to/otherpage method=get input type=text name=q / input type=submit value=Search / /form No wicket required Martijn On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to create traditional form processing in wicket: to direct a form target to a (bookmarkable) page and receive the form content as PageParameters on that page. Is there any easy and supported way to achieve this? E.g. I have a search page that receives the parameters that way, and I'd like to have a form that targets that page with visible input field and a hidden field. With the usual way, I'd create it as part of a stateless form, but I'd like to skip the processing on the old page. Thanks and regards, Istvan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: traditional(?) form processing
form wicket:id=form/form add(new WebMarkupContainer(form).add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(action, urlFor(pageClass))); Martijn On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, missed an important part: What is the best way to populate the form's action attribute with a page's bookmarkable url (without knowning it either in the HTML or in the Java code, just the Page class is known)? Regards, Istvan On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, this was too easy... :) what is the best way to populate the form's action attribute? Regards, Istvan On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: form action=/mount/path/to/otherpage method=get input type=text name=q / input type=submit value=Search / /form No wicket required Martijn On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to create traditional form processing in wicket: to direct a form target to a (bookmarkable) page and receive the form content as PageParameters on that page. Is there any easy and supported way to achieve this? E.g. I have a search page that receives the parameters that way, and I'd like to have a form that targets that page with visible input field and a hidden field. With the usual way, I'd create it as part of a stateless form, but I'd like to skip the processing on the old page. Thanks and regards, Istvan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: traditional(?) form processing
http://old.nabble.com/Bookmarkable-page-absolute-url-td15825082.html 2010/1/6 Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com: Sorry, missed an important part: What is the best way to populate the form's action attribute with a page's bookmarkable url (without knowning it either in the HTML or in the Java code, just the Page class is known)? Regards, Istvan On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, this was too easy... :) what is the best way to populate the form's action attribute? Regards, Istvan On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: form action=/mount/path/to/otherpage method=get input type=text name=q / input type=submit value=Search / /form No wicket required Martijn On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to create traditional form processing in wicket: to direct a form target to a (bookmarkable) page and receive the form content as PageParameters on that page. Is there any easy and supported way to achieve this? E.g. I have a search page that receives the parameters that way, and I'd like to have a form that targets that page with visible input field and a hidden field. With the usual way, I'd create it as part of a stateless form, but I'd like to skip the processing on the old page. Thanks and regards, Istvan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: traditional(?) form processing
Sorry, missed an important part: What is the best way to populate the form's action attribute with a page's bookmarkable url (without knowning it either in the HTML or in the Java code, just the Page class is known)? Regards, Istvan On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, this was too easy... :) what is the best way to populate the form's action attribute? Regards, Istvan On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: form action=/mount/path/to/otherpage method=get input type=text name=q / input type=submit value=Search / /form No wicket required Martijn On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to create traditional form processing in wicket: to direct a form target to a (bookmarkable) page and receive the form content as PageParameters on that page. Is there any easy and supported way to achieve this? E.g. I have a search page that receives the parameters that way, and I'd like to have a form that targets that page with visible input field and a hidden field. With the usual way, I'd create it as part of a stateless form, but I'd like to skip the processing on the old page. Thanks and regards, Istvan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: traditional(?) form processing
Thanks, I do appreciate your fast response! Regards, Istvan On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: form wicket:id=form/form add(new WebMarkupContainer(form).add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(action, urlFor(pageClass))); Martijn On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, missed an important part: What is the best way to populate the form's action attribute with a page's bookmarkable url (without knowning it either in the HTML or in the Java code, just the Page class is known)? Regards, Istvan On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, this was too easy... :) what is the best way to populate the form's action attribute? Regards, Istvan On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: form action=/mount/path/to/otherpage method=get input type=text name=q / input type=submit value=Search / /form No wicket required Martijn On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Istvan Soos istvan.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to create traditional form processing in wicket: to direct a form target to a (bookmarkable) page and receive the form content as PageParameters on that page. Is there any easy and supported way to achieve this? E.g. I have a search page that receives the parameters that way, and I'd like to have a form that targets that page with visible input field and a hidden field. With the usual way, I'd create it as part of a stateless form, but I'd like to skip the processing on the old page. Thanks and regards, Istvan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RadioGroup with radio objects with same values
Hi, I have a radiogroup that is built up dynamically, so I don't know ahead of time what the choices are going to be. Now I noticed that if I have 3 radio buttons in a RadioGroup and let's say they all have the same value (are all empty for example), the selected radio button will be the last one in the group. Let me give an example: RadioGroup * value1 = foo * value2 = foo * value3 = foo So all 3 radio choices have the value foo. The persisted value is also foo, so all are valid so to speak and therefore the one that gets selected is the 3d one. However, I would like it to be the first. Could someone point me in the right direction how I should go about overriding this behavior so it takes the first value it encounters instead of the last? Thanks, Jonck
Autosize modal window
Hi, Is it possible to have a modal window auto-size depending on its contents? I've been fiddling with header contributions and such but can't get it to work. Thanks! Jonck
Re: Autosize modal window
Hi, according to the inline documentation of ModalWindow you can only autosize if you add components and don't use ModalWindow.PageCreator something like ModalWindow modalWindow = new ModalWindow(); modalWindow.add(new MyPanel(modalWindow.getComponentId()); Best Regards, Ilja Pavkovic Am Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2010 17:12:05 schrieb Kogel, Jonck-van-der: Hi, Is it possible to have a modal window auto-size depending on its contents? I've been fiddling with header contributions and such but can't get it to work. Thanks! Jonck -- binaere bauten gmbh · tempelhofer ufer 1a · 10961 berlin +49 · 171 · 9342 465 Handelsregister: HRB 115854 - Amtsgericht Charlottenburg Geschäftsführer: Dipl.-Inform. Ilja Pavkovic, Dipl.-Inform. Jost Becker - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
datagrid error
Hi,
I am trying to adapt datagrid example and can't resolve following:
ERROR - RequestCycle - Exception in rendering component:
[Component id = id1]
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Exception in rendering component:
[Component id = id1]
at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2658)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebComponent.onRender(WebComponent.java:62)
at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450)
at
com.inmethod.grid.common.ColumnsHeaderRepeater.onRender(ColumnsHeaderRepeater.java:142)
at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450)
at
org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1414)
at
org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:1577)
at
org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAssociatedMarkup(MarkupContainer.java:675)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:114)
at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2619)
at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:1512)
at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450)
at
org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1414)
at
org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:1577)
at
org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAssociatedMarkup(MarkupContainer.java:675)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:114)
at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2619)
at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:1512)
at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450)
at
org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1414)
at
org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAll(MarkupContainer.java:1528)
at org.apache.wicket.Page.onRender(Page.java:1545)
at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450)
at org.apache.wicket.Page.renderPage(Page.java:914)
at
org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.respond(BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.java:261)
at
org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.respond(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:105)
at
org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:1258)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1329)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428)
at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:479)
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:312)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1089)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:365)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:712)
at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:405)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:139)
at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:295)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:503)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:827)
at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:511)
at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:210)
at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:379)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.bio.SocketConnector$Connection.run(SocketConnector.java:226)
at
org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(BoundedThreadPool.java:442)
Caused by: java.util.MissingResourceException: Unable to find property:
'id1' for component: grid1:header:header:id1
[class=com.inmethod.grid.column.AbstractColumn$1]
at org.apache.wicket.Localizer.getString(Localizer.java:344)
at org.apache.wicket.Localizer.getString(Localizer.java:138)
at
org.apache.wicket.model.ResourceModel$AssignmentWrapper.getObject(ResourceModel.java:125)
at
org.apache.wicket.model.ResourceModel$AssignmentWrapper.getObject(ResourceModel.java:92)
at
org.apache.wicket.Component.getDefaultModelObject(Component.java:1657)
at
org.apache.wicket.Component.getDefaultModelObjectAsString(Component.java:1676)
at
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.basic.Label.onComponentTagBody(Label.java:114)
at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2619)
... 46 more
INFO - ServerAndClientTimeFilter - 1391ms server time taken for request
response size: 9967
public HomePage_Grid() {
ListIGridColumn columns = new ArrayListIGridColumn();
Re: Initial page - state question
Hi Igor, The same happens now if i use Bookmarkable PageLinks (maybe i miss-configured something) Example: http://localhost:8080/user/id/4711 Is it always nessesary to make the redirect or only at the first page-access? Thanks Jens Am 30.12.2009 17:48, schrieb Igor Vaynberg: while not being an official solution it works. -igor On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Jens Zastrowm...@jens-zastrow.de wrote: Hi wicket-experts, If i access my wicket page by an url containing the wicket-page version-informations all ajax-modificatins (tree-selections, form-input) are still available after pressing the 'reload' button. Example: http://localhost:8080/?wicket:interface=:2 Unfortunly this does hold for the first-page of my app, which is invoked by a plain url http://localhost:8080/ - without any page-version information. The 'reload' button now has the effect that all the ajax-modifications are gone. I know why that happens and that the behavior is correct. But is there a way the solve this in a wicket-way? My current workaround is a redirect which - i guess - is not the official solution to this? Thanks Jens - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- dipl. inform jens zastrow phone | +49.152.04840108 mail | m...@jens-zastrow.de web | http://jens-zastrow.de xing | http://www.xing.com/profile/Jens_Zastrow - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
OnChangeAjaxBehavior with palette
i'm trying using a text field to search through the items available to be selected in a palette. As of right now, it searches correctly but if I add items to the selected side of the palette and then search again, I lose my previously selected choices. Is there anyway to only refresh the available menu and not the selected menu? mail2web.com Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft® Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: datagrid error
Caused by: java.util.MissingResourceException: Unable to find property: 'id1' for component: grid1:header:header:id1 You are missing property id1 for column header in your property file. -Matej On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Igor Racic igor.ra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to adapt datagrid example and can't resolve following: ERROR - RequestCycle - Exception in rendering component: [Component id = id1] org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Exception in rendering component: [Component id = id1] at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2658) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebComponent.onRender(WebComponent.java:62) at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450) at com.inmethod.grid.common.ColumnsHeaderRepeater.onRender(ColumnsHeaderRepeater.java:142) at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1414) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:1577) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAssociatedMarkup(MarkupContainer.java:675) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:114) at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2619) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:1512) at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1414) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderComponentTagBody(MarkupContainer.java:1577) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAssociatedMarkup(MarkupContainer.java:675) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:114) at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2619) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:1512) at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1414) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAll(MarkupContainer.java:1528) at org.apache.wicket.Page.onRender(Page.java:1545) at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2450) at org.apache.wicket.Page.renderPage(Page.java:914) at org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.respond(BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.java:261) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.respond(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:105) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:1258) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1329) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1428) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:479) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:312) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1089) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:365) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:712) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:405) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:139) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:295) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:503) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:827) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:511) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:210) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:379) at org.mortbay.jetty.bio.SocketConnector$Connection.run(SocketConnector.java:226) at org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(BoundedThreadPool.java:442) Caused by: java.util.MissingResourceException: Unable to find property: 'id1' for component: grid1:header:header:id1 [class=com.inmethod.grid.column.AbstractColumn$1] at org.apache.wicket.Localizer.getString(Localizer.java:344) at org.apache.wicket.Localizer.getString(Localizer.java:138) at org.apache.wicket.model.ResourceModel$AssignmentWrapper.getObject(ResourceModel.java:125) at org.apache.wicket.model.ResourceModel$AssignmentWrapper.getObject(ResourceModel.java:92) at org.apache.wicket.Component.getDefaultModelObject(Component.java:1657) at org.apache.wicket.Component.getDefaultModelObjectAsString(Component.java:1676) at
Re: how to iterate over checkboxes?
Take a look on wicket-phonebook - it features a checkbox column for selection of rows. Sven HB wrote: I think you got me wrong. There is a check box at the end of each row of AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable. Upon click a button, I want to iterate over the checkboxes and collects the objects associated with them. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to iterate over checkboxes?
Search this list for checkboxcolumn -Igor On Wednesday, January 6, 2010, HB hubaghd...@yahoo.ca wrote: Hey, I have AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable and I want to add a check box at the end of each row to enable a batch operation. Upon clicking Send button, how to iterate over the check boxes and gets the object associated with it? Thanks for help and time. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: RadioGroup with radio objects with same values
Hi, If its the first item in the list, set it to be selected one. A simple boolean could work here. cheers, Steve On 07/01/2010, at 2:04 AM, Kogel, Jonck-van-der wrote: Hi, I have a radiogroup that is built up dynamically, so I don't know ahead of time what the choices are going to be. Now I noticed that if I have 3 radio buttons in a RadioGroup and let's say they all have the same value (are all empty for example), the selected radio button will be the last one in the group. Let me give an example: RadioGroup * value1 = foo * value2 = foo * value3 = foo So all 3 radio choices have the value foo. The persisted value is also foo, so all are valid so to speak and therefore the one that gets selected is the 3d one. However, I would like it to be the first. Could someone point me in the right direction how I should go about overriding this behavior so it takes the first value it encounters instead of the last? Thanks, Jonck - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: LoadableDetachable
If you use it as the default model it will, but otherwise, you have to override onDetach() and call detach() on all your non-default models. On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote: I was under the assumption that wicket calls detach on LoadableDeatchable automatically on each request. Is this not true? D/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
