Re: new feature in trunk and branch: Component#onInitialize()
Igor,
Thanks for this new feature!
Just one question/remark... the JavaDoc of onBeforeRender states
* Because this method is responsible for cascading {...@link
#onBeforeRender()} call to
* children it is strongly recommended that super call is made at the
end of the override.
Is this also true for onInitialize? I understand from JavaDoc bellow
that this method is called only once after component construction (on
first request cycle?) so for more dynamic situations we still will
need to use onBeforeRender. Is this assumption true?
Cheers,
Ernesto
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
there have been a lot of threads over the years about having some
place to initialize components other than constructors. there are a
few problems with constructors, such as not being able to call
getPage() or non-final methods. historically we have refused to
implement this because we have maintained constructors were good
enough, but over the years i have seen a few usecases where something
like this would have been really nice. there have always been easy
workarounds that is why we were in no hurry to implement this, but i
think the time has come.
below is the javadoc from the method
/**
* This method is meant to be used as an alternative to initialize
components. Usually the
* component's constructor is used for this task, but sometimes a
component cannot be
* initialized in isolation, it may need to access its parent
component or its markup in order
* to fully initialize. This method is invoked once per component's
lifecycle when a path exists
* from this component to the {...@link Page} thus providing the
component with an atomic callback
* when the component's environment is built out.
* p
* Overrides must call supe...@link #onInitialize()}
* /p
*
* p
* It is safe to use {...@link #getPage()} in this method
* /p
*
* p
* NOTE:The timing of this call is not precise, the contract is that
it is called sometime
* before {...@link Component#onBeforeRender()}.
* /p
*
*/
protected void onInitialize()
{
}
play around and see if you can find any problems. this will be part of
1.4.10 and 1.5.M1
-igor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: new feature in trunk and branch: Component#onInitialize()
onInitialize() is called only once, like the javadoc says.
-igor
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com wrote:
Igor,
Thanks for this new feature!
Just one question/remark... the JavaDoc of onBeforeRender states
* Because this method is responsible for cascading {...@link
#onBeforeRender()} call to
* children it is strongly recommended that super call is made at the
end of the override.
Is this also true for onInitialize? I understand from JavaDoc bellow
that this method is called only once after component construction (on
first request cycle?) so for more dynamic situations we still will
need to use onBeforeRender. Is this assumption true?
Cheers,
Ernesto
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
there have been a lot of threads over the years about having some
place to initialize components other than constructors. there are a
few problems with constructors, such as not being able to call
getPage() or non-final methods. historically we have refused to
implement this because we have maintained constructors were good
enough, but over the years i have seen a few usecases where something
like this would have been really nice. there have always been easy
workarounds that is why we were in no hurry to implement this, but i
think the time has come.
below is the javadoc from the method
/**
* This method is meant to be used as an alternative to initialize
components. Usually the
* component's constructor is used for this task, but sometimes a
component cannot be
* initialized in isolation, it may need to access its parent
component or its markup in order
* to fully initialize. This method is invoked once per component's
lifecycle when a path exists
* from this component to the {...@link Page} thus providing the
component with an atomic callback
* when the component's environment is built out.
* p
* Overrides must call supe...@link #onInitialize()}
* /p
*
* p
* It is safe to use {...@link #getPage()} in this method
* /p
*
* p
* NOTE:The timing of this call is not precise, the contract is that
it is called sometime
* before {...@link Component#onBeforeRender()}.
* /p
*
*/
protected void onInitialize()
{
}
play around and see if you can find any problems. this will be part of
1.4.10 and 1.5.M1
-igor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Consecutive AJAX operations lead to Page Expired
Not very sure what you meant by quickstart or it didnt happen but I am
assuming is referring to the lack of code sample. If so, sorry for the
incomplete post.
Here is the Panel class in question, trimmed down to size to just the
relevant parts.
public class MyPanel extends Panel {
public MyPanel (String id, BasePage? parent) {
super(id, parent);
addPanelComponents();
}
private class MyForm extends Form {
private PageParameters properties;
public AddCompetitorForm(String name) {
super(name);
addFormComponents();
}
public void addFormComponents() {
this.properties = new PageParameters();
add(new MyUrlTextField(WICKETID_INPUT, new
PropertyModelString(this.properties, WICKETID_INPUT)));
add(new AjaxButton(WICKETID_BUTTON_ADD, this) {
protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget
target, Form? form) {
super.onError(target, form);
onApplicationError(target);
}
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget
target, Form? form) {
String value =
AddCompetitorForm.this.properties.getString(WICKETID_INPUT);
try {
//write data to DB
repaintListViewComponent(listView, listViewData, target,
repaintableContainer);
} catch (Exception e) {
onApplicationError(target, e, e.getMessage());
}
}
});
}
}
protected void addPanelComponents() {
add(new MyForm(WICKETID_FORM));
listView = new ListViewWebsiteModel(WICKETID_REPEATER,
listViewData) {
protected void populateItem(ListItemMyPOJO item) {
final MyPOJO c = item.getModelObject();
item.add(new
AjaxFallbackLink(WICKETID_BUTTON_DEL) {
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget
target) {
try {
//delete this entry
from the database
listViewData.remove(c);
repaintListViewComponent(listView, listViewData, target,
repaintableContainer);
} catch (Exception e) {
onApplicationError(target, e, e.getMessage());
}
}
getTimeLogger().endLoggingPage();
}
});
}
};
listView.setReuseItems(true);
listView.setOutputMarkupId(true);
repaintableContainer.add(listView);
add(repaintableContainer);
}
protected void repaintListViewComponent(ListView repeater, List model,
AjaxRequestTarget target, WebMarkupContainer container) {
repeater.modelChanging();
repeater.removeAll();
repeater.setList(model);
repeater.modelChanged();
target.addComponent(container);
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Consecutive-AJAX-operations-lead-to-Page-Expired-tp2286087p2287076.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: new feature in trunk and branch: Component#onInitialize()
The sources shows that the markup container is initialized prior to children initialization. As expected. I used to double check due to onBeforeRender() method. Should javadoc mention aforementioned? The great news is that onBeforeRender() will never be used for component initialization just for rendering event. Looking forward for 1.4.10 -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/new-feature-in-trunk-and-branch-Component-onInitialize-tp2286924p2287133.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Consecutive AJAX operations lead to Page Expired
I guess he meant that this is very common use case and that's why we
believe it is an error in your code.
Please create as simple as possible application that manifests the
problem [1] and attach it to a ticket in the bug tracking system [2].
[1] To create a simple application you may use Wicket Quickstart -
http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html
Extend it so it shows the problem.
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET
You have to login to create a new ticket
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 00:07 -0700, asarpe wrote:
Not very sure what you meant by quickstart or it didnt happen but I am
assuming is referring to the lack of code sample. If so, sorry for the
incomplete post.
Here is the Panel class in question, trimmed down to size to just the
relevant parts.
public class MyPanel extends Panel {
public MyPanel (String id, BasePage? parent) {
super(id, parent);
addPanelComponents();
}
private class MyForm extends Form {
private PageParameters properties;
public AddCompetitorForm(String name) {
super(name);
addFormComponents();
}
public void addFormComponents() {
this.properties = new PageParameters();
add(new MyUrlTextField(WICKETID_INPUT, new
PropertyModelString(this.properties, WICKETID_INPUT)));
add(new AjaxButton(WICKETID_BUTTON_ADD, this) {
protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget
target, Form? form) {
super.onError(target, form);
onApplicationError(target);
}
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget
target, Form? form) {
String value =
AddCompetitorForm.this.properties.getString(WICKETID_INPUT);
try {
//write data to DB
repaintListViewComponent(listView, listViewData, target,
repaintableContainer);
} catch (Exception e) {
onApplicationError(target, e, e.getMessage());
}
}
});
}
}
protected void addPanelComponents() {
add(new MyForm(WICKETID_FORM));
listView = new ListViewWebsiteModel(WICKETID_REPEATER,
listViewData) {
protected void populateItem(ListItemMyPOJO item) {
final MyPOJO c = item.getModelObject();
item.add(new
AjaxFallbackLink(WICKETID_BUTTON_DEL) {
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget
target) {
try {
//delete this entry
from the database
listViewData.remove(c);
repaintListViewComponent(listView, listViewData, target,
repaintableContainer);
} catch (Exception e) {
onApplicationError(target, e, e.getMessage());
}
}
getTimeLogger().endLoggingPage();
}
});
}
};
listView.setReuseItems(true);
listView.setOutputMarkupId(true);
repaintableContainer.add(listView);
add(repaintableContainer);
}
protected void repaintListViewComponent(ListView repeater, List model,
AjaxRequestTarget target, WebMarkupContainer container) {
repeater.modelChanging();
repeater.removeAll();
repeater.setList(model);
repeater.modelChanged();
target.addComponent(container);
}
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
wicket in a mobile application.
Please tell me how successful is wicket in mobile application?? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-in-a-mobile-application-tp2287273p2287273.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: wicket in a mobile application.
What do you mean with mobile? Search for walmart on this list. Then you will find some informations about walmart using Wicket for mobile devices. Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: amit1400158 [mailto:ade...@qasource.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Juli 2010 13:22 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: wicket in a mobile application. Please tell me how successful is wicket in mobile application?? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-in-a-mobile-application-tp2287273p2287273.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket in a mobile application.
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@wicket.apache.org/msg48605.html On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:21 PM, amit1400158 ade...@qasource.com wrote: Please tell me how successful is wicket in mobile application?? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-in-a-mobile-application-tp2287273p2287273.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket in a mobile application.
Check out: http://www.thebuzzmedia.com/apache-wicket-powers-mobile-walmart-com/ Also, keep in mind Wicket is a server side component framework and like all such frameworks it produces HTML, BUT as you will read from the link that it allows you maintain consistent server-side code for components that could generate specialized HTML for each mobile device. + It's AJAX support is pretty comprehensive. The question is a bit vague but hopefully the above will provide you with some clues. ..am learning the ropes myself heh :) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-in-a-mobile-application-tp2287273p2287300.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket in a mobile application.
Thanks for speedy replies Stefan I already know that walmart has developed its mobile site in wicket, I want to know how successful is wicket in mobile applications. Like are there any performance issues with using wicket in mobile, are there any tendencies of hanging the application?? I have worked in wicket for 2 years now, but have never developed any app for mobile, So please bear with my simple qustions. Thanks in advance 1. Do we have to use different jdk while developing mobile apps?? 2. Are there any special browsers for testing apps developed for mobile?? 3. Is there any specification for mobile wicket apps?? 4. Are there any books or online tutorials available for this?? 5.Do we have to develop some special components for mobile apps?? 6.Lastly, if I have worked on developing complex desktop apps in wicket, how difficult it is for me to develop wicket mobile applications Regards, Amit Dewan -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-in-a-mobile-application-tp2287273p2287332.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket in a mobile application.
Arjun thanks for explaining me nicely -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-in-a-mobile-application-tp2287273p2287334.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket in a mobile application.
Hi Amit, the market for web-apps specially designed for mobiles is rather new, the technological decisions made in that area aren't quite settled yet. Its not even clear if serving your content in an web-app is the best approach. The biggest problem seems to be the big number of different devices out there. Solving that is not really dependent on the framework you use for developing the web-app. Though if you use wicket your toolbox is well set. Since it is not possible to render the content customized down to every device out there a classification of the devices needs to be done. Then it is a monetary question to decide how many device classes ought to be supported. With wicket you might have the chance of developing the components once and then render em using the html template that fits the device best. Wickets style mechanism is a good entry point for that. Ad 1. It runs on the server side, no different jdk needed Ad 2. Firefox offers a plugin that lets you configure the user-agent string in the header, so the browser can mimic another browser. As many of the mobile browsers are WebKit based Google Chrome is a good start to test with. Ad 3. err... not that I know of. Ad 4. Life will teach you Ad 5. same as 3. Ad 6. How should we know. Just go ahead and tell us about the experiences you make mf 2010/7/13 amit1400158 ade...@qasource.com Thanks for speedy replies Stefan I already know that walmart has developed its mobile site in wicket, I want to know how successful is wicket in mobile applications. Like are there any performance issues with using wicket in mobile, are there any tendencies of hanging the application?? I have worked in wicket for 2 years now, but have never developed any app for mobile, So please bear with my simple qustions. Thanks in advance 1. Do we have to use different jdk while developing mobile apps?? 2. Are there any special browsers for testing apps developed for mobile?? 3. Is there any specification for mobile wicket apps?? 4. Are there any books or online tutorials available for this?? 5.Do we have to develop some special components for mobile apps?? 6.Lastly, if I have worked on developing complex desktop apps in wicket, how difficult it is for me to develop wicket mobile applications Regards, Amit Dewan -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-in-a-mobile-application-tp2287273p2287332.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Page Expired with back button
Hello, when I go back to the previous page with the browsers back button and click on a link on that page, I get every time a page expired error. It seems like Wicket loses the session, since all other actions in the application then results in an expired error. I've looked if the number of session on tomcat changes but there is no change, so tomcat seems to keep the session. The same problem occurs if I click on link and immediately click on a second link before the response of the first click was received. I'm using Wicket 1.4.8 on tomcat 5.5 and 6. Any idea how to fix or where to look for the error? Thanks! Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Page Expired with back button
You are the second person reporting this problem with click link1 and then click link2 this week. Can you please create a simple application that shows the problem and attach it to Jira ticket. On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 07:38 -0700, Christian Helmbold wrote: Hello, when I go back to the previous page with the browsers back button and click on a link on that page, I get every time a page expired error. It seems like Wicket loses the session, since all other actions in the application then results in an expired error. I've looked if the number of session on tomcat changes but there is no change, so tomcat seems to keep the session. The same problem occurs if I click on link and immediately click on a second link before the response of the first click was received. I'm using Wicket 1.4.8 on tomcat 5.5 and 6. Any idea how to fix or where to look for the error? Thanks! Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: new feature in trunk and branch: Component#onInitialize()
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:05 AM, vladimir.kovalyuk koval...@gmail.com wrote: The sources shows that the markup container is initialized prior to children initialization. As expected. im pretty sure that is a safe assumption to make, not sure if its javadoc worthy. -igor I used to double check due to onBeforeRender() method. Should javadoc mention aforementioned? The great news is that onBeforeRender() will never be used for component initialization just for rendering event. Looking forward for 1.4.10 -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/new-feature-in-trunk-and-branch-Component-onInitialize-tp2286924p2287133.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: new feature in trunk and branch: Component#onInitialize()
Nice, I have one or two places where onInitialize would make more sense than onBeforeRender. Thanks for the update! One question, does it matter where in the override we call super#onInitialize (beginning or end)?
Re: new feature in trunk and branch: Component#onInitialize()
i think in most cases it would make sense to call super first, just like the constructor. -igor On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Josh Glassman josh...@gmail.com wrote: Nice, I have one or two places where onInitialize would make more sense than onBeforeRender. Thanks for the update! One question, does it matter where in the override we call super#onInitialize (beginning or end)? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Panel update with Ajax
Hi, always when working with PropertyModel make sure that the properties exists. In your case it should probably be: new PropertyModelString(this, model.object.id)) Note that using the CompoundPropertyModel as suggested earlier is much easier. Regards Sven On 07/13/2010 05:16 AM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: Thank you. I didn't know that wicket will pick the properties without getters. I thought I have to create a getter for each property before it's seen. Now the remaining issues: When I use soemthing like : add(new Label(id, new PropertyModelString(this, model.id))); I get an exception: WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class org.apache.wicket.model.CompoundPropertyModel expression: id Root cause: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: No get method defined for class: class org.apache.wicket.model.CompoundPropertyModel expression: id at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.PropertyResolver.getGetAndSetter(PropertyResolver.java:445) The second issue is when I use add(new AjaxEditableLabelString(codProduct)); and then try to update the panel, I get this exception: WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class rentals.entities.Product expression: label Root cause: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: No get method defined for class: class rentals.entities.Product expression: label at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.PropertyResolver.getGetAndSetter(PropertyResolver.java:445) Any explanation why this is happening ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: new feature in trunk and branch: Component#onInitialize()
I always wonder about the order and worry what could go wrong. A small sentence in the javadoc would stop that. E.g. something simple like: * p * Markup containers are initialized prior to their children. * /p would be marvelous. Regards, Erik. Op 13-07-10 17:16, Igor Vaynberg wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:05 AM, vladimir.kovalyukkoval...@gmail.com wrote: The sources shows that the markup container is initialized prior to children initialization. As expected. im pretty sure that is a safe assumption to make, not sure if its javadoc worthy. -igor I used to double check due to onBeforeRender() method. Should javadoc mention aforementioned? The great news is that onBeforeRender() will never be used for component initialization just for rendering event. Looking forward for 1.4.10 -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/new-feature-in-trunk-and-branch-Component-onInitialize-tp2286924p2287133.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Sent from my SMTP compliant software Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Interrupting AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior
Hi all, This may have been asked-and-answered but here goes ... I'm looking for a way to interrupt a AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior. Specifically, there is a AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior running on a page to auto-refresh displayed data. There is also a button to invoke a dialog to allow the user to change critieria that determines what data is to be displayed. Presently it appears that the button's onclick handler does not get invoked until the timer fires after its current interval has been met. When the button is clicked I would like the timer to be interrupted and allow the onclick handler to do its thing immediately. Simple enough, eh? Thanks, -Dennis -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Interrupting-AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior-tp2287833p2287833.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Any Italian wicket maniacs out there?
Hi, I would like to ask some Italian users about something personal. If any, and don't mind please contact me privately. I'll surely appreciate it. regards, f(t)
Multiple columns using div with last one on each row different
I'm using wicket to generate HTML and Compass/Blueprint to manage the CSS. I have a multi column layout with a product in each cell like: P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 Etc., With the blueprint CSS framework you need to specify a slightly different CSS 'class' (eg., lastCell) for the last item in each row and that uses different CSS that does not append an extra 'space' in the grid as it does for the previous cells in that row. I know that I can use new SimpleAttributeModifier(class, lastCell)); when populating the list view but to do that I need to know how many cells will appear in each row. What if I didn't want to hard code that and leave it up to the markup to decide. Is there any wicket markup trick that I can use to tell wicket to insert a special 'class' value into the 'last cell' on each row? -Original Message- From: Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail [mailto:francisco.diaztre...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2010 6:13 AM To: Wicket-Users Subject: Any Italian wicket maniacs out there? Hi, I would like to ask some Italian users about something personal. If any, and don't mind please contact me privately. I'll surely appreciate it. regards, f(t) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Multiple columns using div with last one on each row different
Not familiar with the blueprint framework, but is there some reason
you could not use
whatever:last-child {
}
CSS pseudo-selector?
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
I'm using wicket to generate HTML and Compass/Blueprint to manage the
CSS.
I have a multi column layout with a product in each cell like:
P1 P2 P3
P4 P5 P6
P7
Etc.,
With the blueprint CSS framework you need to specify a slightly
different CSS 'class' (eg., lastCell) for the last item in each row
and that uses different CSS that does not append an extra 'space' in the
grid as it does for the previous cells in that row.
I know that I can use
new SimpleAttributeModifier(class, lastCell));
when populating the list view but to do that I need to know how many
cells will appear in each row. What if I didn't want to hard code that
and leave it up to the markup to decide. Is there any wicket markup
trick that I can use to tell wicket to insert a special 'class' value
into the 'last cell' on each row?
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail
[mailto:francisco.diaztre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2010 6:13 AM
To: Wicket-Users
Subject: Any Italian wicket maniacs out there?
Hi, I would like to ask some Italian users about something personal.
If any, and don't mind please contact me privately. I'll surely
appreciate
it.
regards,
f(t)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Panel update with Ajax
Sven, thank you. But what about the ajax part. On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote: Hi, always when working with PropertyModel make sure that the properties exists. In your case it should probably be: new PropertyModelString(this, model.object.id)) This one is not working as expected. Do you have a ling for an example ? Note that using the CompoundPropertyModel as suggested earlier is much easier. Regards Sven On 07/13/2010 05:16 AM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: Thank you. I didn't know that wicket will pick the properties without getters. I thought I have to create a getter for each property before it's seen. Now the remaining issues: When I use soemthing like : add(new Label(id, new PropertyModelString(this, model.id))); I get an exception: WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class org.apache.wicket.model.CompoundPropertyModel expression: id Root cause: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: No get method defined for class: class org.apache.wicket.model.CompoundPropertyModel expression: id at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.PropertyResolver.getGetAndSetter(PropertyResolver.java:445) The second issue is when I use add(new AjaxEditableLabelString(codProduct)); and then try to update the panel, I get this exception: WicketMessage: No get method defined for class: class rentals.entities.Product expression: label Root cause: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: No get method defined for class: class rentals.entities.Product expression: label at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.PropertyResolver.getGetAndSetter(PropertyResolver.java:445) Any explanation why this is happening ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Multiple columns using div with last one on each row different
That would probably not work because the child at the end of each row is not
necessarily the last child in the 'containing object'.
The container is the category which has n products eg.,
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8
Where P8 would be the last child
But I need P3 and P6 to be marked as 'last cell'.
-Original Message-
From: Anh [mailto:7za...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2010 1:19 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Multiple columns using div with last one on each row
different
Not familiar with the blueprint framework, but is there some reason
you could not use
whatever:last-child {
}
CSS pseudo-selector?
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
I'm using wicket to generate HTML and Compass/Blueprint to manage the
CSS.
I have a multi column layout with a product in each cell like:
P1 P2 P3
P4 P5 P6
P7
Etc.,
With the blueprint CSS framework you need to specify a slightly
different CSS 'class' (eg., lastCell) for the last item in each row
and that uses different CSS that does not append an extra 'space' in the
grid as it does for the previous cells in that row.
I know that I can use
new SimpleAttributeModifier(class, lastCell));
when populating the list view but to do that I need to know how many
cells will appear in each row. What if I didn't want to hard code that
and leave it up to the markup to decide. Is there any wicket markup
trick that I can use to tell wicket to insert a special 'class' value
into the 'last cell' on each row?
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail
[mailto:francisco.diaztre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2010 6:13 AM
To: Wicket-Users
Subject: Any Italian wicket maniacs out there?
Hi, I would like to ask some Italian users about something personal.
If any, and don't mind please contact me privately. I'll surely
appreciate
it.
regards,
f(t)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
