Re: spring 3.1 wicket auth integration
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring-security-and-wicket-auth-roles.html 2011/2/28 wic...@geofflancaster.com wic...@geofflancaster.com Can anyone point me to a tutorial or example on getting spring 3.x setup and working with wicket-auth-roles for an AuthenticatedWebApplication? Thanks in advance. mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft® Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Panel update after Ajax Submit
Hello everybody!
Hope someone can help me. I don't really understand, what I should add as
ajax target :(
So, I have an abstract class Index where I add all my panels (3) and it is
my masterlayout. I add the panels in the index class like this:
add(new ShoppingCartPanel(id, anotherMehod);
The appropriate Markup has just following tags (ShoppingCartPanel.html):
wicket:panel
Content
/wicketpanel
In the other Page (that inherits from Index) I have implemented the
AjaxSubmitLink:
add(new AjaxSubmitLink(addtocart) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form) {
target.addComponent(?);
What I want is, when the link is activated the panel should be updated...
First: I don't really understand what I have add to the addComponent()
method ?
Second: Where schould I set setOutputMarupId(true) ?
Thank You!
Re: Panel update after Ajax Submit
Hi there,
If you want to refresh the panel, call setOutputMarkupId(true) on the panel
, then add the panel to the target.
If the Ajax Link is on the same panel, you can call
this.setOutputMarkupId(true) , and you can also add MyPanel.this to the
target.
The point is , what ever you want to refresh via ajax must have
outputMarkupId set to true.
Hope that helps.
Josh.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello everybody!
Hope someone can help me. I don't really understand, what I should add as
ajax target :(
So, I have an abstract class Index where I add all my panels (3) and it is
my masterlayout. I add the panels in the index class like this:
add(new ShoppingCartPanel(id, anotherMehod);
The appropriate Markup has just following tags (ShoppingCartPanel.html):
wicket:panel
Content
/wicketpanel
In the other Page (that inherits from Index) I have implemented the
AjaxSubmitLink:
add(new AjaxSubmitLink(addtocart) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form) {
target.addComponent(?);
What I want is, when the link is activated the panel should be updated...
First: I don't really understand what I have add to the addComponent()
method ?
Second: Where schould I set setOutputMarupId(true) ?
Thank You!
Re: Perfomance of IDataProvider
Thanks a lot for your replies, truly.
With the ideas that all have contributed i write a LDM that store a object
that is recovered in iterator and also a id for this object (to recover to
the database after).
I think this will be useful for people who start using Dataview,and are
somewhat confused with the operation.
public class DetachableContactModel extends LoadableDetachableModel
{
private long id;
public DetachableContactModel(Contact c)
{
super(c); //wraps object in model (that is transient internally and
is deleted when method detach fires)
this.id = c.getId();
//this is not a transient member, that store de id of the object for
get from the database after
}
protected Object load()
{
Object ret;
ret=this.getObject();
if(ret == null)
{
//If user click remove link for one row, internal transient
object is null and should get load object from data layer
return getContactsDB().get(id); }
else
{
//If program execute this, means that dataview is painting rows
and render process of page not ends yet
return this.getObject(); }
}
}
If you use a AjaxLink in a dataview row that gets the modelobject
IDataProvider not calls iterator method and only is called load method from
LDM, getting the ContactsDB object from database (because this.getObject();
returns null )
And if you use normal link, full page is reloaded and again calls iterator
method, and model for each row (in this case return getContactsDB().get(id);
never be executed), etc...
I think that LDM in conjunction of IDataProvider and DataView are designed
for use in projects that implements persistence data layer such as hibernate
(and this is not mentioned in wicket documentation).
In the small projects not need have necessarily persistence layer, in my
humble opinion... if you write hand made dao o service layer for a few
tables or entities you only need a few methods that execute for example
stored procedures that inset, select and update rows in tables.
In this case that is not exists caching the implementation that i seen in
wicket oficial examples and in other more pages result in a lack of
performance because your prehistoric data access layer (handmade recalls) do
not caching nothing!
I hope reviews!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Perfomance-of-IDataProvider-tp3325777p3329554.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Getting Javascript function return value in Wicket
Just want to add that the call to the class which would encapsulate the code to call the javascript function and get the result would not be in the constructor, rather in the onclick() of a button or the applyState() of the wizard. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Getting-Javascript-function-return-value-in-Wicket-tp3327794p3329641.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Wicket-3438 seems to cause issues if a form is removed
Upgraded to wicket 1.4.16 yesterday, and it seems to cause issues when a form
is removed after submit. Problem is probably related to the change in
Wicket-3438 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3438
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3438 )
The usage we have a few places is something like this
onSubmit() {
updateData();
replacePanel();
}
Used to work fine, but looking at Form#process(IFormSubmittingComponent
submittingComponent) it first delegates the submit to our button
implementation, then calls parameters.remove(getHiddenFieldId());
getHiddenFieldId() tries to look up the page to check if it's stateless, but as
the panel containing the form has been replaced already the form has no parent
page.
The only place I've encountered that is in parameters.remove(hiddenFieldId);
could be solved by retrieving the parameter before delegating the submit, and
removing the parameter after processing is done. Looking at the code it doesn't
seem like it would be a terribly good idea to remove all the parameters before
delegating the process, but retrieving it shouldn't be an issue. The rest of
the parameter cleanup seems to be safe even if the form is removed.
Alex
Re: [ANN] Plugin WicketForge 0.9.0 available for IDEA 9+
Unfortunately I'm not familiar with scala... but everyone is welcome to join wicketforge and help to improve it... also java profs... -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ANN-Plugin-WicketForge-0-9-0-available-for-IDEA-9-tp3326870p3329698.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
TEST
Hi! I've received this message when I tried to answer a question: Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: users@wicket.apache.org Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 spam score (5.0) exceeded threshold (FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX (state 18). It seems to be something serious error with the mailing server if I could trigger the spam filter only with 2 sentences. -- Zoltán Nagy
Re: How to prevent user from double-clicking a non-Ajax component
Hi! I think Wicket Ajax should prevent this on the client side. As a workaround you can disable the sumbit button from javascript event handler and re-enable it from wicket ajax response. 2011/2/28 eugenebalt eugeneb...@yahoo.com How do we prevent the user from double-clicking a non-Ajax component? When the submit occurs, isEnabled is set to false for the Wicket Button. If the user does a quick double click on the button, its throws a wicket runtime excpetion saying the component is disabled. Thanks -- Zoltán Nagy
Re: Panel update after Ajax Submit
Thanks for reply,
If you want to refresh the panel, call setOutputMarkupId(true) on the panel
, then add the panel to the target.
Does it mean I should call setOutputMarkUpId(true) in the constructor of the
panel? If I do so, the layout of the panel is destroyed.
If the Ajax Link is on the same panel, you can call
this.setOutputMarkupId(true) , and you can also add MyPanel.this to the
target.
No, the link is not on the same panel. This is actually the point that I
don't really understand. What should I add, if the link not on the panel.
The point is , what ever you want to refresh via ajax must have
outputMarkupId set to true.
Hope that helps.
Josh.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello everybody!
Hope someone can help me. I don't really understand, what I should add as
ajax target :(
So, I have an abstract class Index where I add all my panels (3) and it
is
my masterlayout. I add the panels in the index class like this:
add(new ShoppingCartPanel(id, anotherMehod);
The appropriate Markup has just following tags (ShoppingCartPanel.html):
wicket:panel
Content
/wicketpanel
In the other Page (that inherits from Index) I have implemented the
AjaxSubmitLink:
add(new AjaxSubmitLink(addtocart) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form) {
target.addComponent(?);
What I want is, when the link is activated the panel should be updated...
First: I don't really understand what I have add to the addComponent()
method ?
Second: Where schould I set setOutputMarupId(true) ?
Thank You!
Re: TEST
HTML email raises the score pretty much. Martijn On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Zoltán Nagy zberke...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I've received this message when I tried to answer a question: Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: users@wicket.apache.org Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 spam score (5.0) exceeded threshold (FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX (state 18). It seems to be something serious error with the mailing server if I could trigger the spam filter only with 2 sentences. -- Zoltán Nagy -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Panel update after Ajax Submit
Hi, if you update the panel within the form, you need to update it's submit
link component outside this panel also.
onsubmit(target){
target.addComponent(formPanel);
target.addComponent(submitLinkNotNestedInsideTheFormPanel);
}
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for reply,
If you want to refresh the panel, call setOutputMarkupId(true) on the
panel
, then add the panel to the target.
Does it mean I should call setOutputMarkUpId(true) in the constructor of
the
panel? If I do so, the layout of the panel is destroyed.
If the Ajax Link is on the same panel, you can call
this.setOutputMarkupId(true) , and you can also add MyPanel.this to the
target.
No, the link is not on the same panel. This is actually the point that I
don't really understand. What should I add, if the link not on the panel.
The point is , what ever you want to refresh via ajax must have
outputMarkupId set to true.
Hope that helps.
Josh.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello everybody!
Hope someone can help me. I don't really understand, what I should add
as
ajax target :(
So, I have an abstract class Index where I add all my panels (3) and it
is
my masterlayout. I add the panels in the index class like this:
add(new ShoppingCartPanel(id, anotherMehod);
The appropriate Markup has just following tags
(ShoppingCartPanel.html):
wicket:panel
Content
/wicketpanel
In the other Page (that inherits from Index) I have implemented the
AjaxSubmitLink:
add(new AjaxSubmitLink(addtocart) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form)
{
target.addComponent(?);
What I want is, when the link is activated the panel should be
updated...
First: I don't really understand what I have add to the addComponent()
method ?
Second: Where schould I set setOutputMarupId(true) ?
Thank You!
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: TEST
Thanks! I turn off formating. 2011/3/1 Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com HTML email raises the score pretty much. Martijn -- Zoltán Nagy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Panel update after Ajax Submit
No, the panel is outside! What I just want, is that the panel shows me the
result of the submit.
But I did it :)
Hier is my solution:
1. Call in the constructor of the panel setOutputMarkUpId(true);
2. Instantiate the panel Class in the abstract Class (masterlayout) as field
and return it back with a simple getter.
3. In the AjaxSubmitLink: target.addComponent(call the getter from an
abstract class);
I don't know, if it was right, but it works now :)
What do the experts mean?
On 1 March 2011 14:04, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, if you update the panel within the form, you need to update it's submit
link component outside this panel also.
onsubmit(target){
target.addComponent(formPanel);
target.addComponent(submitLinkNotNestedInsideTheFormPanel);
}
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for reply,
If you want to refresh the panel, call setOutputMarkupId(true) on the
panel
, then add the panel to the target.
Does it mean I should call setOutputMarkUpId(true) in the constructor of
the
panel? If I do so, the layout of the panel is destroyed.
If the Ajax Link is on the same panel, you can call
this.setOutputMarkupId(true) , and you can also add MyPanel.this to the
target.
No, the link is not on the same panel. This is actually the point that I
don't really understand. What should I add, if the link not on the panel.
The point is , what ever you want to refresh via ajax must have
outputMarkupId set to true.
Hope that helps.
Josh.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Dmitriy Neretin
dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello everybody!
Hope someone can help me. I don't really understand, what I should
add
as
ajax target :(
So, I have an abstract class Index where I add all my panels (3) and
it
is
my masterlayout. I add the panels in the index class like this:
add(new ShoppingCartPanel(id, anotherMehod);
The appropriate Markup has just following tags
(ShoppingCartPanel.html):
wicket:panel
Content
/wicketpanel
In the other Page (that inherits from Index) I have implemented the
AjaxSubmitLink:
add(new AjaxSubmitLink(addtocart) {
@Override
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form)
{
target.addComponent(?);
What I want is, when the link is activated the panel should be
updated...
First: I don't really understand what I have add to the
addComponent()
method ?
Second: Where schould I set setOutputMarupId(true) ?
Thank You!
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Panel update after Ajax Submit
Hi! 2011/3/1 Dmitriy Neretin dmitriy.nere...@googlemail.com: Thanks for reply, If you want to refresh the panel, call setOutputMarkupId(true) on the panel , then add the panel to the target. Does it mean I should call setOutputMarkUpId(true) in the constructor of the panel? If I do so, the layout of the panel is destroyed. You should set it before you first send out the component (normal pageRender or in on ajax response). You can set it in the constructor or some time before Rendering. -- Zoltán Nagy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket-3438 seems to cause issues if a form is removed
Hi it is a bug, I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3488
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Alexander Landsnes Keül
alexander.landsnes.k...@visma.no wrote:
Upgraded to wicket 1.4.16 yesterday, and it seems to cause issues when a
form is removed after submit. Problem is probably related to the change in
Wicket-3438 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3438
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3438 )
The usage we have a few places is something like this
onSubmit() {
updateData();
replacePanel();
}
Used to work fine, but looking at Form#process(IFormSubmittingComponent
submittingComponent) it first delegates the submit to our button
implementation, then calls parameters.remove(getHiddenFieldId());
getHiddenFieldId() tries to look up the page to check if it's stateless,
but as the panel containing the form has been replaced already the form has
no parent page.
The only place I've encountered that is in
parameters.remove(hiddenFieldId); could be solved by retrieving the
parameter before delegating the submit, and removing the parameter after
processing is done. Looking at the code it doesn't seem like it would be a
terribly good idea to remove all the parameters before delegating the
process, but retrieving it shouldn't be an issue. The rest of the parameter
cleanup seems to be safe even if the form is removed.
Alex
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Displaying table in a modalDialog
Hi!
Yes, i've also run into this problem.
See the sources of the generated page, something will be between the
table and th/tr/tbody/thead tags. The browser simply drops your
generated list content or takes it outside of your table tags.
2011/2/28 Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com:
Has anyone else experienced this problem?
Or do i need to create a quickstart?
Josh.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I am
trying to use a list view in a modal dialog. But all the time the modal
dialog shows everything else except what is inside the table/table tags
Here is the panel that am setting as the modal dialog content.
Panel.html
wicket:panel
form wicket:id=frmProject
div id=content
div style=margin: 2px 0pt 10px;
div style=float: right;1 selected of 13/div
input type=checkbox wicket:id=selector/
Select/Deselect All
/div
div wicket:id=projectUsers
span wicket:id=lbTest/span
table class=grid_list_table
thead
tr
th style=width: 10px;input
type=checkbox/th
thFirst Nameimg src=img/desc.png
class=sort/th
thLast Name/th
th style=width: 50%;/th
/tr
/thead
tbody
tr class=odd wicket:id=checkList
tdinput type=checkbox checked=checked
wicket:id=checkbox/td
td wicket:id=lbFirstNameBob/td
td wicket:id=lbLastNameSmith/td
td/td
/tr
/tbody
/table
/div
/div
/form
/wicket:panel
Here is the Java class
package com.printgate.webportal.panels;
import java.util.List;
import org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget;
import org.apache.wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.basic.Label;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Check;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.CheckGroup;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.CheckGroupSelector;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.list.ListItem;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.list.ListView;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel;
import org.apache.wicket.model.CompoundPropertyModel;
import org.apache.wicket.model.LoadableDetachableModel;
import com.google.inject.Inject;
import com.printgate.webportal.dao.ProjectDao;
import com.printgate.webportal.dao.UserDao;
import com.printgate.webportal.entities.Project;
import com.printgate.webportal.entities.User;
import java.util.ArrayList;
public class ModifyUsersPanel extends Panel {
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private FormModifyUsersPanel frmProject;
private ListViewUser lstUsers;
private CheckGroupUser chbUsers;
@Inject
private ProjectDao projectDao;
@Inject
private UserDao userDao;
private ListUser projectUsers = new ArrayListUser();
public ModifyUsersPanel(String id, final Project project) {
super(id);
projectUsers = userDao.getAllUsers();
frmProject = new FormModifyUsersPanel(frmProject, new
CompoundPropertyModelModifyUsersPanel(ModifyUsersPanel.this));
frmProject.setOutputMarkupId(true);
chbUsers = new CheckGroupUser(projectUsers);
chbUsers.add(new AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
projectDao.updateProject(project);
}
});
lstUsers = new ListViewUser(checkList, new
LoadableDetachableModelListUser() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected ListUser load() {
return userDao.getAllUsers();
}
}) {
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItemUser item) {
item.add(new CheckUser(checkbox, item.getModel()));
item.add(new Label(lbFirstName,
item.getModelObject().getFirstname()));
item.add(new Label(lbLastName,
item.getModelObject().getLastname()));
}
};
lstUsers.setReuseItems(true);
chbUsers.add(lstUsers);
frmProject.add(chbUsers);
frmProject.add(new CheckGroupSelector(selector, chbUsers));
RE: Perfomance of IDataProvider
Here's a start, please anyone correct me if I've made any mistakes...
public class ListLDM extends LoadableDetachableModelList {
private String id;
public ListLDM(List l, String id) {
//constructor with primed model
super(l);
this.id = id;
}
public ListLDM(String id) {
//constructor with empty model
this.id = id;
}
@Override
protected List load() {
return service.getList(id);
}
}
From: John Owen jo...@globalscape.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 02/28/2011 05:35 PM
Subject:RE: Perfomance of IDataProvider
An example with a list would be quite useful.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: mzem...@osc.state.ny.us [mailto:mzem...@osc.state.ny.us]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 3:10 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Perfomance of IDataProvider
If I understand where you are going I completely agree the example is a
little misleading. Some ways to think about it differently...
id is synonymous with a small sub-set of the entire result-set which
can be used to rehydrate the detached model
The model is the data you want to provide to a repeater for instance, so
this can be a single Contact model (one query for each row) or a
ContactList (one query per page with pagination). Retrieving a list
instead of each contact individually would be more efficient.
If you need an example let me know...
From: Juansoft andresnet2...@yahoo.es
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 02/28/2011 03:53 PM
Subject:Re: Perfomance of IDataProvider
First render thanks for your replies.
@vov: If i use this:
public IModelEntity model(Entity entity)
{
return new ModelEntity(entity);
}
In this case the memory footprint of the session grows because you return
Model object that is not a transient object(or this is what I've read in
wicket documentation...!!) . ¿This means that if you dataview have 100
rows
you have 100 ModelEntity stored in your session?
¿To avoid this do not exist LoadableDetachableModel what is detached after
page rendering?
@James Carman:
This is the aspect of the most LoadableDetachableModel used in DataView
examples. Specifically in wicket official examples. For each row in
DataView
this create new DetachableContactModel , store his ID. After in method
populateItem of Dataview, getModelObject() call result in direct call to
DetachableContactModel.load() that again return object to a database.
Using hibernate this object is cached (or so I have understood), but if
use
hand made DAO (like me) that simply query and return a POJO populated this
result in more database conections and querys! Am I right?
public class DetachableContactModel extends LoadableDetachableModel
{
private long id;
protected ContactsDatabase getContactsDB()
{
return DatabaseLocator.getDatabase();
}
/**
* @param c
*/
public DetachableContactModel(Contact c)
{
this(c.getid())
}
/**
* @param id
*/
public DetachableContactModel(long id)
{
if (id == 0)
{
throw new IllegalArgumentException();
}
this.id = id;
}
/**
* @see java.lang.Object#hashCode()
*/
public int hashCode()
{
return Long.valueOf(id).hashCode();
}
/**
* used for dataview with ReuseIfModelsEqualStrategy item reuse
strategy
*
* @see org.apache.wicket.markup.repeater.ReuseIfModelsEqualStrategy
* @see java.lang.Object#equals(java.lang.Object)
*/
public boolean equals(final Object obj)
{
if (obj == this)
{
return true;
}
else if (obj == null)
{
return false;
}
else if (obj instanceof DetachableContactModel)
{
DetachableContactModel other = (DetachableContactModel)obj;
return other.id == this.id;
}
return false;
}
/**
* @see org.apache.wicket.model.LoadableDetachableModel#load()
*/
@Override
protected Object load()
{
// loads contact from the database
return getContactsDB().get(id);
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Perfomance-of-IDataProvider-tp3325777p3328345.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
under State and/or Federal law.
Re: Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?)
*bump* I'm one of those people who is reading :-) Antoine On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Per p...@hamburg.de wrote: Hi, I am measuring it in a profiler after the request has been completed, but thanks for the hint. In case anyone else is reading, I have been playing with the onComponentTag() and onComponentTagBody() methods on the weekend, and I've been able to reduce my page sizes significantly. Admittedly, this comes at the expense of flexibility and beauty, but I'm only doing this in the inner loops of very few pages, so who cares :-) Will write a summary with a couple of hints once I stop drowning in work. Cheers, Per Reading in the other thread that a session size of 100K or less is achievable, I'll admit defeat now: I have not been able to shrink some of my pages(!) to less than 200K, not to mention the sessions. Despite LDMs, CompoundPropertyModels, and no, there are no domain objects in there, and no finals. How are you measuring this? Keep in mind that if you calculate when a request is still processing, you might still be measuring temporary data (e.g. for LoadableDetachableModel, you would also measure the transientModelObject, and same for any proxies (Spring/ Guice) you might use. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=0 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=1 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Displaying table in a modalDialog
Thanks Zoltan,
How did you resolve the issue? In my case , the entire table/table tag
is removed. If i put a test label just outside the table tag, it is
displayed.
Josh.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Zoltán Nagy zberke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Yes, i've also run into this problem.
See the sources of the generated page, something will be between the
table and th/tr/tbody/thead tags. The browser simply drops your
generated list content or takes it outside of your table tags.
2011/2/28 Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com:
Has anyone else experienced this problem?
Or do i need to create a quickstart?
Josh.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi there,
I am
trying to use a list view in a modal dialog. But all the time the modal
dialog shows everything else except what is inside the table/table
tags
Here is the panel that am setting as the modal dialog content.
Panel.html
wicket:panel
form wicket:id=frmProject
div id=content
div style=margin: 2px 0pt 10px;
div style=float: right;1 selected of 13/div
input type=checkbox wicket:id=selector/
Select/Deselect All
/div
div wicket:id=projectUsers
span wicket:id=lbTest/span
table class=grid_list_table
thead
tr
th style=width: 10px;input
type=checkbox/th
thFirst Nameimg src=img/desc.png
class=sort/th
thLast Name/th
th style=width: 50%;/th
/tr
/thead
tbody
tr class=odd wicket:id=checkList
tdinput type=checkbox checked=checked
wicket:id=checkbox/td
td wicket:id=lbFirstNameBob/td
td wicket:id=lbLastNameSmith/td
td/td
/tr
/tbody
/table
/div
/div
/form
/wicket:panel
Here is the Java class
package com.printgate.webportal.panels;
import java.util.List;
import org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget;
import
org.apache.wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.basic.Label;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Check;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.CheckGroup;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.CheckGroupSelector;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.list.ListItem;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.list.ListView;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel;
import org.apache.wicket.model.CompoundPropertyModel;
import org.apache.wicket.model.LoadableDetachableModel;
import com.google.inject.Inject;
import com.printgate.webportal.dao.ProjectDao;
import com.printgate.webportal.dao.UserDao;
import com.printgate.webportal.entities.Project;
import com.printgate.webportal.entities.User;
import java.util.ArrayList;
public class ModifyUsersPanel extends Panel {
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private FormModifyUsersPanel frmProject;
private ListViewUser lstUsers;
private CheckGroupUser chbUsers;
@Inject
private ProjectDao projectDao;
@Inject
private UserDao userDao;
private ListUser projectUsers = new ArrayListUser();
public ModifyUsersPanel(String id, final Project project) {
super(id);
projectUsers = userDao.getAllUsers();
frmProject = new FormModifyUsersPanel(frmProject, new
CompoundPropertyModelModifyUsersPanel(ModifyUsersPanel.this));
frmProject.setOutputMarkupId(true);
chbUsers = new CheckGroupUser(projectUsers);
chbUsers.add(new AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
projectDao.updateProject(project);
}
});
lstUsers = new ListViewUser(checkList, new
LoadableDetachableModelListUser() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected ListUser load() {
return userDao.getAllUsers();
}
}) {
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItemUser item) {
item.add(new CheckUser(checkbox,
RE: Perfomance of IDataProvider
Thank for the replies!
MZemeck wrote:
Here's a start, please anyone correct me if I've made any mistakes...
public class ListLDM extends LoadableDetachableModelList {
private String id;
public ListLDM(List l, String id) {
//constructor with primed model
super(l);
this.id = id;
}
public ListLDM(String id) {
//constructor with empty model
this.id = id;
}
@Override
protected List load() {
return service.getList(id);
}
}
In this example , the object that you're wrap in the inner model (List l
that you are send in super() constructor) is not used anywhere... ¿i'm
wrong? in this case , ¿why should be using this (in reference a List l in
constructor)?
-
Another wicket newbie programmer
Wicket en Español -
http://aprendiendowicket.wordpress.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Perfomance-of-IDataProvider-tp3325777p3330259.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Perfomance of IDataProvider
It is referenced by the superclass (LoadableDetachableModel in this
case). It will cache the list until after the request cycle is
complete. Upon subsequent request cycles, the load() method will be
called to re-load the list.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Juansoft andresnet2...@yahoo.es wrote:
Thank for the replies!
MZemeck wrote:
Here's a start, please anyone correct me if I've made any mistakes...
public class ListLDM extends LoadableDetachableModelList {
private String id;
public ListLDM(List l, String id) {
//constructor with primed model
super(l);
this.id = id;
}
public ListLDM(String id) {
//constructor with empty model
this.id = id;
}
@Override
protected List load() {
return service.getList(id);
}
}
In this example , the object that you're wrap in the inner model (List l
that you are send in super() constructor) is not used anywhere... ¿i'm
wrong? in this case , ¿why should be using this (in reference a List l in
constructor)?
-
Another wicket newbie programmer
Wicket en Español -
http://aprendiendowicket.wordpress.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Perfomance-of-IDataProvider-tp3325777p3330259.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Perfomance of IDataProvider
super(l) stores the model as an instance variable on the superclass. When
getObject() is called on the LDM, it checks to see if the instance
variable (the model object) is null. If it is null, load() will be called
to populate the model. Once the request is complete the model is detached
(instance variable set to null). Then the cycle repeats...
A use case for super(l) is SortableDataProvider (SDP) seen below and taken
from Wicket repeaters example. The SDP retrieves the records of interest
for pagination using iterator(), then creates a model. If the object was
not passed into the DetachableContactModel, the load() method would make
another db call to populate the model.
public class SortableContactDataProvider extends SortableDataProviderContact
{
public SortableContactDataProvider() {
// set default sort
setSort(firstName, SortOrder.ASCENDING);
}
public IteratorContact iterator(int first, int count) {
return service.find(first, count, getSort()).iterator();
}
public int size() {
return service.getCount();
}
public IModelContact model(Contact object) {
return new DetachableContactModel(object);
}
}
From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 03/01/2011 01:11 PM
Subject:Re: Perfomance of IDataProvider
Sent by:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
It is referenced by the superclass (LoadableDetachableModel in this
case). It will cache the list until after the request cycle is
complete. Upon subsequent request cycles, the load() method will be
called to re-load the list.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Juansoft andresnet2...@yahoo.es wrote:
Thank for the replies!
MZemeck wrote:
Here's a start, please anyone correct me if I've made any mistakes...
public class ListLDM extends LoadableDetachableModelList {
private String id;
public ListLDM(List l, String id) {
//constructor with primed model
super(l);
this.id = id;
}
public ListLDM(String id) {
//constructor with empty model
this.id = id;
}
@Override
protected List load() {
return service.getList(id);
}
}
In this example , the object that you're wrap in the inner model (List
l
that you are send in super() constructor) is not used anywhere... ¿i'm
wrong? in this case , ¿why should be using this (in reference a List l
in
constructor)?
-
Another wicket newbie programmer
Wicket en Español -
http://aprendiendowicket.wordpress.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Perfomance-of-IDataProvider-tp3325777p3330259.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure
under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if
you have received this communication in error and delete this email from
your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not
to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the
contents of this information.
Re: Vote/Veto: Should I put 1.5 RC1 on App Engine into production this week?
Interesting, I'm also migrating to Wicket 1.5 with GAE First a comment: In addition to what you mention I had to change the default HeaderRenderStrategy to org.apache.wicket.markup.renderStrategy.ParentFirstHeaderRenderStrategy since it's rendering the child headers before parents and that doesn't work for me. I tried reverting the call order in renderHead() but didn't work. Now a question: Did you use Ajax? . I'm getting the following error and I don't know what could be the problem (I'm a wicket newbie :S ) Last cause: STREAMED WicketMessage: Method onRequest of interface org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener targeted at org.apache.wicket.ajax.markup.html.form.AjaxButton$1@161b0bc on component [ [Component id = postCommentButton]] threw an exception Root cause: java.lang.IllegalStateException: STREAMED at org.mortbay.jetty.Request.getReader(Request.java:935) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest.generatePostParameters(ServletWebRequest.java:250) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest.getPostRequestParameters(ServletWebRequest.java:294) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest.access$000(ServletWebRequest.java:60) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest$1.getParameterValues(ServletWebRequest.java:331) at org.apache.wicket.request.parameter.CombinedRequestParametersAdapter.getParameterValues(CombinedRequestParametersAdapter.java:88) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.getInputAsArray(FormComponent.java:702) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.inputChanged(FormComponent.java:871) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form$9.component(Form.java:1045) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form$9.component(Form.java:1041) at org.apache.wicket.util.visit.Visits.visitPostOrderHelper(Visits.java:274) at org.apache.wicket.util.visit.Visits.visitPostOrderHelper(Visits.java:263) at org.apache.wicket.util.visit.Visits.visitPostOrderHelper(Visits.java:263) at org.apache.wicket.util.visit.Visits.visitPostOrder(Visits.java:246) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.visitFormComponentsPostOrder(FormComponent.java:344) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.visitFormComponentsPostOrder(Form.java:980) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.inputChanged(Form.java:1039) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:706) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.onEvent(AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.java:148) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxEventBehavior.respond(AjaxEventBehavior.java:166) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.onRequest(AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.java:300) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.agent.runtime.Runtime.invoke(Runtime.java:100) at org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface.internalInvoke(RequestListenerInterface.java:259) at org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface.invoke(RequestListenerInterface.java:240) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler.invokeListener(ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler.java:178) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler.respond(ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler.java:157) at org.apache.wicket.request.RequestHandlerStack.executeRequestHandler(RequestHandlerStack.java:84) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequest(RequestCycle.java:205) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequestAndDetach(RequestCycle.java:247) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.processRequest(WicketFilter.java:138) Thanks! On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Per p...@hamburg.de wrote: Hi Martin, yes, I used your utility, it was great to get me started! Funny enough, I had prepared several questions (which I then ended up answering by myself and never posted), and in each of them I was referring to your utility. Almost asked you directly, but figured it out before I did. I'll make sure it's mentioned in the overall summary once I am through with this. Two items maybe worth mentioning already, since you asked: If you use the always-on feature in GAE, there's a much higher chance that your session gets deserialised on a node that was not in use yet. You get an exception like this: Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: PageManager for application quickstart not registered. at org.apache.wicket.page.MyPersistentPageManager$SessionEntry.getPageStore(MyPersistentPageManager.java:117) at org.apache.wicket.page.MyPersistentPageManager$SessionEntry.readObject(MyPersistentPageManager.java:292) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
Re: Displaying table in a modalDialog
exactly. the problem is on the client side. I don't know a really good solution but these workaround could solve it: - turn off generating wicket: tags: Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true); - don't use table at all, use divs instead - use separate templates for development and production environment. only in production environment (where rendering wicket: tags is disabled) use table tags. 2011/3/1 Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com: Thanks Zoltan, How did you resolve the issue? In my case , the entire table/table tag is removed. If i put a test label just outside the table tag, it is displayed. Josh. -- Zoltán Nagy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Displaying table in a modalDialog
Thanks Zultan for your feedback. Striping wicket tags didnt help. Anything other than a table works. Does it mean it is Illegal to use table tags inside inside a modal dialog? Josh. On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Zoltán Nagy zberke...@gmail.com wrote: exactly. the problem is on the client side. I don't know a really good solution but these workaround could solve it: - turn off generating wicket: tags: Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true); - don't use table at all, use divs instead - use separate templates for development and production environment. only in production environment (where rendering wicket: tags is disabled) use table tags. 2011/3/1 Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com: Thanks Zoltan, How did you resolve the issue? In my case , the entire table/table tag is removed. If i put a test label just outside the table tag, it is displayed. Josh. -- Zoltán Nagy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: CheckBoxMultipleChoice.getInput() = NULL after switch to AjaxSubmit
Hi, send a quickstart, I tried to simulate here without success, CheckBoxMultipleChoice is working fine. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:20 PM, eugenebalt eugeneb...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes, I've tried both the first one and the second one with onclick/onchange. The problem is still happening. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/CheckBoxMultipleChoice-getInput-NULL-after-switch-to-AjaxSubmit-tp3317829p3321391.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Displaying table in a modalDialog
Did you check the javadocs for ModalWindow? If you want to use form in modal window component make sure that you put the modal window itself in another form (nesting forms is legal in Wicket) and that the form on modal window is submitted before the window get closed. I don't know if that will help or not, but you seem to be using a form in the modal window. Also, I believe it works better with pages than with panels. You might try that. On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Zultan for your feedback. Striping wicket tags didnt help. Anything other than a table works. Does it mean it is Illegal to use table tags inside inside a modal dialog? Josh. On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Zoltán Nagy zberke...@gmail.com wrote: exactly. the problem is on the client side. I don't know a really good solution but these workaround could solve it: - turn off generating wicket: tags: Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true); - don't use table at all, use divs instead - use separate templates for development and production environment. only in production environment (where rendering wicket: tags is disabled) use table tags. 2011/3/1 Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com: Thanks Zoltan, How did you resolve the issue? In my case , the entire table/table tag is removed. If i put a test label just outside the table tag, it is displayed. Josh. -- Zoltán Nagy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?)
Hi Antoine, I have started collecting my hints over here: http://www.small-improvements.com/blog/technical/tuning-wicket-session-size Please note that much of it may be considered hacks and bad practice (I am just a Wicket user, not a Wicket master). There may be better ways to achieve the same results. I'd love to get feedback on these suggestions! So give it a shot and tell me how you went! Good luck! Per *bump* I'm one of those people who is reading :-) Antoine On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Per [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=0 wrote: Hi, I am measuring it in a profiler after the request has been completed, but thanks for the hint. In case anyone else is reading, I have been playing with the onComponentTag() and onComponentTagBody() methods on the weekend, and I've been able to reduce my page sizes significantly. Admittedly, this comes at the expense of flexibility and beauty, but I'm only doing this in the inner loops of very few pages, so who cares :-) Will write a summary with a couple of hints once I stop drowning in work. Cheers, Per Reading in the other thread that a session size of 100K or less is achievable, I'll admit defeat now: I have not been able to shrink some of my pages(!) to less than 200K, not to mention the sessions. Despite LDMs, CompoundPropertyModels, and no, there are no domain objects in there, and no finals. How are you measuring this? Keep in mind that if you calculate when a request is still processing, you might still be measuring temporary data (e.g. for LoadableDetachableModel, you would also measure the transientModelObject, and same for any proxies (Spring/ Guice) you might use. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=0 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=1 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html?by-user=t To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0by-user=t. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html?by-user=t Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=1 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=2 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=3 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=4 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3330006.html To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3330425.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: Displaying table in a modalDialog
Hi James, I use a form in a moda window. i have also put the modal window inside another form (i have called it modal window holder) Josh. On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:19 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote: Did you check the javadocs for ModalWindow? If you want to use form in modal window component make sure that you put the modal window itself in another form (nesting forms is legal in Wicket) and that the form on modal window is submitted before the window get closed. I don't know if that will help or not, but you seem to be using a form in the modal window. Also, I believe it works better with pages than with panels. You might try that. On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Zultan for your feedback. Striping wicket tags didnt help. Anything other than a table works. Does it mean it is Illegal to use table tags inside inside a modal dialog? Josh. On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Zoltán Nagy zberke...@gmail.com wrote: exactly. the problem is on the client side. I don't know a really good solution but these workaround could solve it: - turn off generating wicket: tags: Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true); - don't use table at all, use divs instead - use separate templates for development and production environment. only in production environment (where rendering wicket: tags is disabled) use table tags. 2011/3/1 Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com: Thanks Zoltan, How did you resolve the issue? In my case , the entire table/table tag is removed. If i put a test label just outside the table tag, it is displayed. Josh. -- Zoltán Nagy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Displaying table in a modalDialog
Hi Josh, CheckGroup is set to render body only by default. As it correspond
to your table tag, it will be skipped. You can
call frmUserList.setRenderBodyOnly(false) or bind the CheckGroup component
to another tag in the markup, that can be skipped.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I havent gotten a solution for this yet. The problem is , when i display a
table inside a modal dialog, the table tags disappear completly. Attached
please find a quickstart demonstrating the same
Kind regards.
Josh.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Zoltan,
How did you resolve the issue? In my case , the entire table/table
tag is removed. If i put a test label just outside the table tag, it is
displayed.
Josh.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Zoltán Nagy zberke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Yes, i've also run into this problem.
See the sources of the generated page, something will be between the
table and th/tr/tbody/thead tags. The browser simply drops your
generated list content or takes it outside of your table tags.
2011/2/28 Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com:
Has anyone else experienced this problem?
Or do i need to create a quickstart?
Josh.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi there,
I am
trying to use a list view in a modal dialog. But all the time the
modal
dialog shows everything else except what is inside the table/table
tags
Here is the panel that am setting as the modal dialog content.
Panel.html
wicket:panel
form wicket:id=frmProject
div id=content
div style=margin: 2px 0pt 10px;
div style=float: right;1 selected of 13/div
input type=checkbox wicket:id=selector/
Select/Deselect All
/div
div wicket:id=projectUsers
span wicket:id=lbTest/span
table class=grid_list_table
thead
tr
th style=width: 10px;input
type=checkbox/th
thFirst Nameimg src=img/desc.png
class=sort/th
thLast Name/th
th style=width: 50%;/th
/tr
/thead
tbody
tr class=odd wicket:id=checkList
tdinput type=checkbox
checked=checked
wicket:id=checkbox/td
td wicket:id=lbFirstNameBob/td
td wicket:id=lbLastNameSmith/td
td/td
/tr
/tbody
/table
/div
/div
/form
/wicket:panel
Here is the Java class
package com.printgate.webportal.panels;
import java.util.List;
import org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget;
import
org.apache.wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.basic.Label;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Check;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.CheckGroup;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.CheckGroupSelector;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.list.ListItem;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.list.ListView;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel;
import org.apache.wicket.model.CompoundPropertyModel;
import org.apache.wicket.model.LoadableDetachableModel;
import com.google.inject.Inject;
import com.printgate.webportal.dao.ProjectDao;
import com.printgate.webportal.dao.UserDao;
import com.printgate.webportal.entities.Project;
import com.printgate.webportal.entities.User;
import java.util.ArrayList;
public class ModifyUsersPanel extends Panel {
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private FormModifyUsersPanel frmProject;
private ListViewUser lstUsers;
private CheckGroupUser chbUsers;
@Inject
private ProjectDao projectDao;
@Inject
private UserDao userDao;
private ListUser projectUsers = new ArrayListUser();
public ModifyUsersPanel(String id, final Project project) {
super(id);
projectUsers = userDao.getAllUsers();
frmProject = new FormModifyUsersPanel(frmProject, new
CompoundPropertyModelModifyUsersPanel(ModifyUsersPanel.this));
frmProject.setOutputMarkupId(true);
chbUsers = new CheckGroupUser(projectUsers);
chbUsers.add(new AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
Re: Displaying table in a modalDialog
Hi Pedro,
good catch.
I've never liked it that CheckGroup is the only component which uses
setRenderBodyOnly(true) by default :(
Not very consistent and thus something to watch out for.
Regards
Sven
Am 01.03.2011 20:29, schrieb Pedro Santos:
Hi Josh, CheckGroup is set to render body only by default. As it correspond
to your table tag, it will be skipped. You can
call frmUserList.setRenderBodyOnly(false) or bind the CheckGroup component
to another tag in the markup, that can be skipped.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Josh Kamaujoshnet2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I havent gotten a solution for this yet. The problem is , when i display a
table inside a modal dialog, the table tags disappear completly. Attached
please find a quickstart demonstrating the same
Kind regards.
Josh.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Josh Kamaujoshnet2...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Zoltan,
How did you resolve the issue? In my case , the entiretable/table
tag is removed. If i put a test label just outside thetable tag, it is
displayed.
Josh.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Zoltán Nagyzberke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Yes, i've also run into this problem.
See the sources of the generated page, something will be between the
table and th/tr/tbody/thead tags. The browser simply drops your
generated list content or takes it outside of your table tags.
2011/2/28 Josh Kamaujoshnet2...@gmail.com:
Has anyone else experienced this problem?
Or do i need to create a quickstart?
Josh.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Josh Kamaujoshnet2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi there,
I am
trying to use a list view in a modal dialog. But all the time the
modal
dialog shows everything else except what is inside thetable/table
tags
Here is the panel that am setting as the modal dialog content.
Panel.html
wicket:panel
form wicket:id=frmProject
div id=content
div style=margin: 2px 0pt 10px;
div style=float: right;1 selected of 13/div
input type=checkbox wicket:id=selector/
Select/Deselect All
/div
div wicket:id=projectUsers
span wicket:id=lbTest/span
table class=grid_list_table
thead
tr
th style=width: 10px;input
type=checkbox/th
thFirst Nameimg src=img/desc.png
class=sort/th
thLast Name/th
th style=width: 50%;/th
/tr
/thead
tbody
tr class=odd wicket:id=checkList
tdinput type=checkbox
checked=checked
wicket:id=checkbox/td
td wicket:id=lbFirstNameBob/td
td wicket:id=lbLastNameSmith/td
td/td
/tr
/tbody
/table
/div
/div
/form
/wicket:panel
Here is the Java class
package com.printgate.webportal.panels;
import java.util.List;
import org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget;
import
org.apache.wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.basic.Label;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Check;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.CheckGroup;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.CheckGroupSelector;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.list.ListItem;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.list.ListView;
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel;
import org.apache.wicket.model.CompoundPropertyModel;
import org.apache.wicket.model.LoadableDetachableModel;
import com.google.inject.Inject;
import com.printgate.webportal.dao.ProjectDao;
import com.printgate.webportal.dao.UserDao;
import com.printgate.webportal.entities.Project;
import com.printgate.webportal.entities.User;
import java.util.ArrayList;
public class ModifyUsersPanel extends Panel {
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private FormModifyUsersPanel frmProject;
private ListViewUser lstUsers;
private CheckGroupUser chbUsers;
@Inject
private ProjectDao projectDao;
@Inject
private UserDao userDao;
private ListUser projectUsers = new ArrayListUser();
public ModifyUsersPanel(String id, final Project project) {
super(id);
projectUsers = userDao.getAllUsers();
frmProject = new FormModifyUsersPanel(frmProject, new
CompoundPropertyModelModifyUsersPanel(ModifyUsersPanel.this));
frmProject.setOutputMarkupId(true);
chbUsers = new CheckGroupUser(projectUsers);
chbUsers.add(new AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
Re: Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?)
Per, Awesome summary. Much obliged. Rob -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3330455.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?)
yup, nice read. tks for sharing onComponentTag saved my arse too in the past. Probably that's why I don't think it's that ugly anymore :) On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:41 PM, robert.mcguinness robert.mcguinness@gmail.com wrote: Per, Awesome summary. Much obliged. Rob -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3330455.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?)
Hi Per, easy to read, good advice... Even the easiest stuff made me wonder whether I did that right... Excellent to see all these tips together. Thanks a bunch! Antoine On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Per p...@hamburg.de wrote: Hi Antoine, I have started collecting my hints over here: http://www.small-improvements.com/blog/technical/tuning-wicket-session-size Please note that much of it may be considered hacks and bad practice (I am just a Wicket user, not a Wicket master). There may be better ways to achieve the same results. I'd love to get feedback on these suggestions! So give it a shot and tell me how you went! Good luck! Per *bump* I'm one of those people who is reading :-) Antoine On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Per [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=0 wrote: Hi, I am measuring it in a profiler after the request has been completed, but thanks for the hint. In case anyone else is reading, I have been playing with the onComponentTag() and onComponentTagBody() methods on the weekend, and I've been able to reduce my page sizes significantly. Admittedly, this comes at the expense of flexibility and beauty, but I'm only doing this in the inner loops of very few pages, so who cares :-) Will write a summary with a couple of hints once I stop drowning in work. Cheers, Per Reading in the other thread that a session size of 100K or less is achievable, I'll admit defeat now: I have not been able to shrink some of my pages(!) to less than 200K, not to mention the sessions. Despite LDMs, CompoundPropertyModels, and no, there are no domain objects in there, and no finals. How are you measuring this? Keep in mind that if you calculate when a request is still processing, you might still be measuring temporary data (e.g. for LoadableDetachableModel, you would also measure the transientModelObject, and same for any proxies (Spring/ Guice) you might use. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=0 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=1 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html?by-user=t To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0by-user=t. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html?by-user=t Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=1 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=2 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=3 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=4 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3330006.html To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0. -- View this message in context:
Re: Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?)
Great stuff, could you let us know when you have completed a 'final' version so I can check back? From: Per p...@hamburg.de To: users@wicket.apache.org Date: 03/01/2011 02:22 PM Subject:Re: Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?) Hi Antoine, I have started collecting my hints over here: http://www.small-improvements.com/blog/technical/tuning-wicket-session-size Please note that much of it may be considered hacks and bad practice (I am just a Wicket user, not a Wicket master). There may be better ways to achieve the same results. I'd love to get feedback on these suggestions! So give it a shot and tell me how you went! Good luck! Per *bump* I'm one of those people who is reading :-) Antoine On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Per [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=0 wrote: Hi, I am measuring it in a profiler after the request has been completed, but thanks for the hint. In case anyone else is reading, I have been playing with the onComponentTag() and onComponentTagBody() methods on the weekend, and I've been able to reduce my page sizes significantly. Admittedly, this comes at the expense of flexibility and beauty, but I'm only doing this in the inner loops of very few pages, so who cares :-) Will write a summary with a couple of hints once I stop drowning in work. Cheers, Per Reading in the other thread that a session size of 100K or less is achievable, I'll admit defeat now: I have not been able to shrink some of my pages(!) to less than 200K, not to mention the sessions. Despite LDMs, CompoundPropertyModels, and no, there are no domain objects in there, and no finals. How are you measuring this? Keep in mind that if you calculate when a request is still processing, you might still be measuring temporary data (e.g. for LoadableDetachableModel, you would also measure the transientModelObject, and same for any proxies (Spring/ Guice) you might use. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=0 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=1 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html?by-user=t To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0by-user=t . -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html?by-user=t Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=1 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=2 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=3 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=4 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3330006.html To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0 . -- View this message in
Re: Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?)
I found this useful also : http://www.small-improvements.com/10-things-about-apache-wicket-i-love/wicket:pageMapName/wicket-8 [same site, same author, kudos Per] On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:13 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote: Great stuff, could you let us know when you have completed a 'final' version so I can check back? From: Per p...@hamburg.de To: users@wicket.apache.org Date: 03/01/2011 02:22 PM Subject:Re: Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?) Hi Antoine, I have started collecting my hints over here: http://www.small-improvements.com/blog/technical/tuning-wicket-session-size Please note that much of it may be considered hacks and bad practice (I am just a Wicket user, not a Wicket master). There may be better ways to achieve the same results. I'd love to get feedback on these suggestions! So give it a shot and tell me how you went! Good luck! Per *bump* I'm one of those people who is reading :-) Antoine On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Per [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=0 wrote: Hi, I am measuring it in a profiler after the request has been completed, but thanks for the hint. In case anyone else is reading, I have been playing with the onComponentTag() and onComponentTagBody() methods on the weekend, and I've been able to reduce my page sizes significantly. Admittedly, this comes at the expense of flexibility and beauty, but I'm only doing this in the inner loops of very few pages, so who cares :-) Will write a summary with a couple of hints once I stop drowning in work. Cheers, Per Reading in the other thread that a session size of 100K or less is achievable, I'll admit defeat now: I have not been able to shrink some of my pages(!) to less than 200K, not to mention the sessions. Despite LDMs, CompoundPropertyModels, and no, there are no domain objects in there, and no finals. How are you measuring this? Keep in mind that if you calculate when a request is still processing, you might still be measuring temporary data (e.g. for LoadableDetachableModel, you would also measure the transientModelObject, and same for any proxies (Spring/ Guice) you might use. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=0 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3316743i=1 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html?by-user=t To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=3308014code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0by-user=t . -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html?by-user=t Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=1 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=2 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=3 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330006i=4 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3330006.html
Re: Wicket philosophy, modelObject isVisible, isEnabled, CSS
one other possibility you didn't mention is to nest or layer models. you could use an attribute modifier with a view-adapting model that wraps the data model to provide translation from a pure data model into a value appropriate for the view layer. this would preserve abstraction better. make sense? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-philosophy-modelObject-isVisible-isEnabled-CSS-tp3328174p3330528.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Displaying table in a modalDialog
That's right. I haven't seen the attached zip. 2011/3/1 Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com: Hi Josh, CheckGroup is set to render body only by default. As it correspond to your table tag, it will be skipped. You can call frmUserList.setRenderBodyOnly(false) or bind the CheckGroup component to another tag in the markup, that can be skipped. -- Zoltán Nagy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Vote/Veto: Should I put 1.5 RC1 on App Engine into production this week?
Hi Fernando, I didn't come across your problems, although I use TONS of Wicket AJAX. :-) But what helped me sort my problems and thoughts was to create a quickstart (see the main docs), and to start with a minimal example. Then enhance it step by step until the quickstart shows the same problem like in production using the real app. You may want to try that too. My application is fairly large and complex, and yet I didn't have to change the header strategy nor did I get the STREAMED error. Chances are there's something in your setup that's not a 100% required. Or if it is, you'd find out by using the minimalistic quickstart route, growing it step by step. Cheers, Per Interesting, I'm also migrating to Wicket 1.5 with GAE First a comment: In addition to what you mention I had to change the default HeaderRenderStrategy to org.apache.wicket.markup.renderStrategy.ParentFirstHeaderRenderStrategy since it's rendering the child headers before parents and that doesn't work for me. I tried reverting the call order in renderHead() but didn't work. Now a question: Did you use Ajax? . I'm getting the following error and I don't know what could be the problem (I'm a wicket newbie :S ) Last cause: STREAMED WicketMessage: Method onRequest of interface org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener targeted at org.apache.wicket.ajax.markup.html.form.AjaxButton$1@161b0bc on component [ [Component id = postCommentButton]] threw an exception Root cause: java.lang.IllegalStateException: STREAMED at org.mortbay.jetty.Request.getReader(Request.java:935) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest.generatePostParameters(ServletWebRequest.java:250) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest.getPostRequestParameters(ServletWebRequest.java:294) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest.access$000(ServletWebRequest.java:60) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest$1.getParameterValues(ServletWebRequest.java:331) at org.apache.wicket.request.parameter.CombinedRequestParametersAdapter.getParameterValues(CombinedRequestParametersAdapter.java:88) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.getInputAsArray(FormComponent.java:702) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.inputChanged(FormComponent.java:871) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form$9.component(Form.java:1045) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form$9.component(Form.java:1041) at org.apache.wicket.util.visit.Visits.visitPostOrderHelper(Visits.java:274) at org.apache.wicket.util.visit.Visits.visitPostOrderHelper(Visits.java:263) at org.apache.wicket.util.visit.Visits.visitPostOrderHelper(Visits.java:263) at org.apache.wicket.util.visit.Visits.visitPostOrder(Visits.java:246) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.visitFormComponentsPostOrder(FormComponent.java:344) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.visitFormComponentsPostOrder(Form.java:980) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.inputChanged(Form.java:1039) at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form.onFormSubmitted(Form.java:706) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.form.AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.onEvent(AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.java:148) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxEventBehavior.respond(AjaxEventBehavior.java:166) at org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.onRequest(AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.java:300) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.agent.runtime.Runtime.invoke(Runtime.java:100) at org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface.internalInvoke(RequestListenerInterface.java:259) at org.apache.wicket.RequestListenerInterface.invoke(RequestListenerInterface.java:240) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler.invokeListener(ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler.java:178) at org.apache.wicket.request.handler.ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler.respond(ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler.java:157) at org.apache.wicket.request.RequestHandlerStack.executeRequestHandler(RequestHandlerStack.java:84) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequest(RequestCycle.java:205) at org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequestAndDetach(RequestCycle.java:247) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.processRequest(WicketFilter.java:138) Thanks! On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Per [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3330365i=0 wrote: Hi Martin, yes, I used your utility, it was great to get me started! Funny enough, I had prepared several questions (which I then ended up answering by myself and never posted), and in each of them I was referring to your utility. Almost asked you directly, but figured
Re: My failed 1.5 migration. Advice on HttpSessionDataStore and/or Jetty clustering needed
Your last exception seems pretty similar to those mentioned in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3470 (especially the last one
also related to GAE: loading a persisted session at application startup).
Attila
2011/3/1 Per Fragemann p...@small-improvements.com
Hi all,
I'm running a pretty complex web application on Wicket 1.4 and Google App
Engine, and want to move to Wicket 1.5. Now before you think GAE,
whatever..., please hear me out! :-) GAE is radically clustered, and
problems showing here may eventually surface in other clustered environments
too. Maybe not as instantly as on GAE, but possibly harder to track then.
While most things work fine currently in 1.4 (except multitab-support), the
1.5 migration was a bit of a desaster, and I had to revert it. I reduced my
problem back to a simple quickstart (see attached). Using Martin's
gae-initialiser, I got it running easily, but here's the problem:
* Add an AJAX component onto a page, e.g. an AjaxButton, and let it modify
the page by updating a label's model to a random number. Click it a couple
of times.
* Now go to a different page.
* Use the browsers back button.
When I test this locally the following happens: If the render-strategy is
ONE_PASS_RENDER or REDIRECT_TO_RENDER, the page has been reset to its
original state when we return to it. when using REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER, the page
displays the right version (e.g. just like we left it). Sweet.
Now, when testing this on the remote GAE server however, things go bad:
one-pass and redirect-to-render continue to not work. But redirect-to-buffer
now displays a random version of the page after pushing the back button! I
can even go back and forward, and get different versions of the page each
time! I suppose the different nodes of App Engine have different page
versions each.
So basically the whole page-serialisation concept is out of order here
(while it works fine on 1.4, and also works fine in 1.5 without using GAE)
Maybe a missing history entry while using the back button isn't that bad,
but I reckon the broken history is *also* to blame for countless
page-expired errors I got, which then led me to roll back the release and
deploy Wicket 1.4 again.
IMO, the bugfix in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3483 hints
at the problem, but only fights the symptom, not the root cause. The fix
wants to avoid that null pages screw up the finding of pages. But when a
null page just got passed into the PersistentPageManager, it's not enough to
properly ignore it; something else seems to be broken in the first place. To
my limited understanding we encounter null here because there's a check in
DefaultPageStore:
public Serializable prepareForSerialization(final String sessionId,
final Object object)
{
if (pageDataStore.isReplicated())
{
return null;
}
The current implementation of the HttpSessionDataStore returns 'true' in
its isReplicated() method, so a null page gets returned then serialised by
the above method, and later it gets deserialised into null again, and then
wicket decides to re-render that page from scratch because it can't deal
with a null object/find the right page in the pagestore.
Now, I wonder, how this is supposed to work at all? How can the
prepareForSerialisation method simply return and then serialise null, and
still expect things to work out later on?
So I thought it might make more sense to return false in the
isReplicatedMethod of HttpSessionDataStore, to force the DefaultPageStore
down the other part. When I do that, *something* is indeed serialised and
wants to get deserialised. However, now I run into a new exciting problem:
Nested in javax.servlet.ServletException:
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: There is no application attached
to current thread pool-4-thread-1:
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: There is no application attached
to current thread pool-4-thread-1
at org.apache.wicket.Application.get(Application.java:227)
at org.apache.wicket.Session.get(Session.java:154)
at
org.apache.wicket.page.DefaultPageManagerContext.getSessionAttribute(DefaultPageManagerContext.java:63)
at
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.memory.HttpSessionDataStore.getPageTable(HttpSessionDataStore.java:128)
at
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.memory.HttpSessionDataStore.storeData(HttpSessionDataStore.java:108)
at
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.DefaultPageStore.storePageData(DefaultPageStore.java:107)
at
org.apache.wicket.pageStore.DefaultPageStore.restoreAfterSerialization(DefaultPageStore.java:287)
at
org.apache.wicket.page.PersistentPageManager$SessionEntry.readObject(PersistentPageManager.java:240)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at
RE: spring 3.1 wicket auth integration
I've seen that wiki but it's for spring 3.0 and wicket 1.3. I need a solution for spring 3.1 and wicket 1.4+ -Original Message- From: moèz ben rhouma [mailto:benrhouma.m...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 2:04 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org; wic...@geofflancaster.com Subject: Re: spring 3.1 wicket auth integration https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring-security-and-wicket-auth-roles.html 2011/2/28 wic...@geofflancaster.com wic...@geofflancaster.com Can anyone point me to a tutorial or example on getting spring 3.x setup and working with wicket-auth-roles for an AuthenticatedWebApplication? Thanks in advance. mail2web.com Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft® Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
