date:20180209

Re: [USRP-users] E310/E312 Receive on all 4 inputs

2018-02-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users


On 02/09/2018 11:01 PM, Ronakraj Gosalia via USRP-users wrote:

Hi folks!

I am wondering if it is possible to receive on all 4 inputs at the 
same time on the E310/E312? I.e. is it possible to receive on TRX A, 
RX A, TRX B, RX B all at the same time? I tried creating a GNU Radio 
flowchart with this setup and got the following Runtime Error:


thread[thread-per-block[16]: ]: RuntimeError: 
On node 0/Radio_0, output port 0 is already connected.


I received the same error when trying to receive on three inputs 
instead, and the program defaulted to receiving on RX A and RX B instead.


Thank you.
Kind regards,

Ronakraj


___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

NO.

There are only two receiver channels, and those channels can either be 
connected (in the analog sense) to TRX or RX antenna connectors, but 
there really

  are only two receiver channels.


___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

[USRP-users] E310/E312 Receive on all 4 inputs

2018-02-09 Thread Ronakraj Gosalia via USRP-users

Hi folks!

I am wondering if it is possible to receive on all 4 inputs at the same
time on the E310/E312? I.e. is it possible to receive on TRX A, RX A, TRX
B, RX B all at the same time? I tried creating a GNU Radio flowchart with
this setup and got the following Runtime Error:

thread[thread-per-block[16]: ]: RuntimeError: On
node 0/Radio_0, output port 0 is already connected.

I received the same error when trying to receive on three inputs instead,
and the program defaulted to receiving on RX A and RX B instead.

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Ronakraj
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Re: [USRP-users] USRP B210 TX-Issues

2018-02-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users


On 02/09/2018 02:48 PM, Jonathan B via USRP-users wrote:

Hi Jeff,

Thanks for the response.

In both cases a gain of 20dB.

Best,
Jonathan
The total gain-control range on the B2xx family is larger (80dB) than on 
the cards used on X3xxx, N2xx, etc (typically 30.5dB)


Try larger gain values on the B210, like 40 or 50dB.



On Feb 9, 2018 8:23 PM, "Jeff Long via USRP-users" 
> wrote:


What are you using for gain settings?

On 02/09/2018 01:09 PM, Jonathan B via USRP-users wrote:

Hi everyone,

I seem to be having issues with the B210 transmitting at an
incredibly low power.

I seem to be getting a 60db difference at the receiver
(spectrum analyzer) between the B210 and N210 with perfectly
identically configured transmissions using the simple uhd
"tx_waveform" example program.

Has anyone experienced such an issue. I have two B210s that
seem to be acting the same way.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,
Jonathan

-

Probe Output of the B210:

-- Loading firmware image: C:\Program
Files\GNURadio-3.7\share\uhd\images\usrp_b200_fw.hex...
-- Detected Device: B210
-- Loading FPGA image: C:\Program
Files\GNURadio-3.7\share\uhd\images\usrp_b210_fpga.bin... done
-- Operating over USB 3.
-- Detecting internal GPSDO No GPSDO found
-- Initialize CODEC control...
-- Initialize Radio control...
-- Performing register loopback test... pass
-- Performing register loopback test... pass
-- Performing CODEC loopback test... pass
-- Performing CODEC loopback test... pass
-- Setting master clock rate selection to 'automatic'.
-- Asking for clock rate 16.00 MHz...
-- Actually got clock rate 16.00 MHz.
-- Performing timer loopback test... pass
-- Performing timer loopback test... pass
   _
  /
|   Device: B-Series Device
| _
|/
|   |   Mboard: B210
|   |   revision: 4
|   |   product: 2
|   |   serial: 3113A66
|   |   name: MyB210
|   |   FW Version: 8.0
|   |   FPGA Version: 14.0
|   |
|   |   Time sources:  none, internal, external, gpsdo
|   |   Clock sources: internal, external, gpsdo
|   |   Sensors: ref_locked
|   | _
|   |/
|   |   |   RX DSP: 0
|   |   |
|   |   |   Freq range: -8.000 to 8.000 MHz
|   | _
|   |/
|   |   |   RX DSP: 1
|   |   |
|   |   |   Freq range: -8.000 to 8.000 MHz
|   | _
|   |/
|   |   |   RX Dboard: A
|   |   |   
 _

|   |   |/
|   |   |   |   RX Frontend: A
|   |   |   |   Name: FE-RX2
|   |   |   |   Antennas: TX/RX, RX2
|   |   |   |   Sensors: temp, rssi, lo_locked
|   |   |   |   Freq range: 50.000 to 6000.000 MHz
|   |   |   |   Gain range PGA: 0.0 to 76.0 step 1.0 dB
|   |   |   |   Bandwidth range: 20.0 to 5600.0 step
0.0 Hz
|   |   |   |   Connection Type: IQ
|   |   |   |   Uses LO offset: No
|   |   |   
 _

|   |   |/
|   |   |   |   RX Frontend: B
|   |   |   |   Name: FE-RX1
|   |   |   |   Antennas: TX/RX, RX2
|   |   |   |   Sensors: temp, rssi, lo_locked
|   |   |   |   Freq range: 50.000 to 6000.000 MHz
|   |   |   |   Gain range PGA: 0.0 to 76.0 step 1.0 dB
|   |   |   |   Bandwidth range: 20.0 to 5600.0 step
0.0 Hz
|   |   |   |   Connection Type: IQ
|   |   |   |   Uses LO offset: No
|   |   |   
 _

|   |   |/
|   |   |   |   RX Codec: A
|   |   |   |   Name: B210 RX dual ADC
|   |   |   |   Gain Elements: None
|   | _
|   |/
|   |   |   TX DSP: 0
|   |   |
|   |   |   Freq range: -8.000 to 8.000 MHz
|   | _
|   |/
|   |   |   TX DSP: 1
|   |   |
|   |   |   Freq range: -8.000 to 8.000 MHz
|   |

Re: [USRP-users] USRP B210 TX-Issues

2018-02-09 Thread Jonathan B via USRP-users

Hi Jeff,

Thanks for the response.

In both cases a gain of 20dB.

Best,
Jonathan

On Feb 9, 2018 8:23 PM, "Jeff Long via USRP-users" <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

> What are you using for gain settings?
>
> On 02/09/2018 01:09 PM, Jonathan B via USRP-users wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I seem to be having issues with the B210 transmitting at an incredibly
>> low power.
>>
>> I seem to be getting a 60db difference at the receiver (spectrum
>> analyzer) between the B210 and N210 with perfectly identically configured
>> transmissions using the simple uhd "tx_waveform" example program.
>>
>> Has anyone experienced such an issue. I have two B210s that seem to be
>> acting the same way.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Jonathan
>>
>> -
>>
>> Probe Output of the B210:
>>
>> -- Loading firmware image: C:\Program Files\GNURadio-3.7\share\uhd\i
>> mages\usrp_b200_fw.hex...
>> -- Detected Device: B210
>> -- Loading FPGA image: C:\Program 
>> Files\GNURadio-3.7\share\uhd\images\usrp_b210_fpga.bin...
>> done
>> -- Operating over USB 3.
>> -- Detecting internal GPSDO No GPSDO found
>> -- Initialize CODEC control...
>> -- Initialize Radio control...
>> -- Performing register loopback test... pass
>> -- Performing register loopback test... pass
>> -- Performing CODEC loopback test... pass
>> -- Performing CODEC loopback test... pass
>> -- Setting master clock rate selection to 'automatic'.
>> -- Asking for clock rate 16.00 MHz...
>> -- Actually got clock rate 16.00 MHz.
>> -- Performing timer loopback test... pass
>> -- Performing timer loopback test... pass
>>_
>>   /
>> |   Device: B-Series Device
>> | _
>> |/
>> |   |   Mboard: B210
>> |   |   revision: 4
>> |   |   product: 2
>> |   |   serial: 3113A66
>> |   |   name: MyB210
>> |   |   FW Version: 8.0
>> |   |   FPGA Version: 14.0
>> |   |
>> |   |   Time sources:  none, internal, external, gpsdo
>> |   |   Clock sources: internal, external, gpsdo
>> |   |   Sensors: ref_locked
>> |   | _
>> |   |/
>> |   |   |   RX DSP: 0
>> |   |   |
>> |   |   |   Freq range: -8.000 to 8.000 MHz
>> |   | _
>> |   |/
>> |   |   |   RX DSP: 1
>> |   |   |
>> |   |   |   Freq range: -8.000 to 8.000 MHz
>> |   | _
>> |   |/
>> |   |   |   RX Dboard: A
>> |   |   | _
>> |   |   |/
>> |   |   |   |   RX Frontend: A
>> |   |   |   |   Name: FE-RX2
>> |   |   |   |   Antennas: TX/RX, RX2
>> |   |   |   |   Sensors: temp, rssi, lo_locked
>> |   |   |   |   Freq range: 50.000 to 6000.000 MHz
>> |   |   |   |   Gain range PGA: 0.0 to 76.0 step 1.0 dB
>> |   |   |   |   Bandwidth range: 20.0 to 5600.0 step 0.0 Hz
>> |   |   |   |   Connection Type: IQ
>> |   |   |   |   Uses LO offset: No
>> |   |   | _
>> |   |   |/
>> |   |   |   |   RX Frontend: B
>> |   |   |   |   Name: FE-RX1
>> |   |   |   |   Antennas: TX/RX, RX2
>> |   |   |   |   Sensors: temp, rssi, lo_locked
>> |   |   |   |   Freq range: 50.000 to 6000.000 MHz
>> |   |   |   |   Gain range PGA: 0.0 to 76.0 step 1.0 dB
>> |   |   |   |   Bandwidth range: 20.0 to 5600.0 step 0.0 Hz
>> |   |   |   |   Connection Type: IQ
>> |   |   |   |   Uses LO offset: No
>> |   |   | _
>> |   |   |/
>> |   |   |   |   RX Codec: A
>> |   |   |   |   Name: B210 RX dual ADC
>> |   |   |   |   Gain Elements: None
>> |   | _
>> |   |/
>> |   |   |   TX DSP: 0
>> |   |   |
>> |   |   |   Freq range: -8.000 to 8.000 MHz
>> |   | _
>> |   |/
>> |   |   |   TX DSP: 1
>> |   |   |
>> |   |   |   Freq range: -8.000 to 8.000 MHz
>> |   | _
>> |   |/
>> |   |   |   TX Dboard: A
>> |   |   | _
>> |   |   |/
>> |   |   |   |   TX Frontend: A
>> |   |   |   |   Name: FE-TX2
>> |   |   |   |   Antennas: TX/RX
>> |   |   |   |   Sensors: temp, lo_locked
>> |   |   |   |   Freq range: 50.000 to 6000.000 MHz
>> |   |   |   |   Gain range PGA: 0.0 to 89.8 step 0.3 dB
>> |   |   |   |   Bandwidth range: 20.0 to 5600.0 step 0.0 Hz
>> |   |   |   |   Connection Type: IQ
>> |   |   |   |   Uses LO offset: No
>> |   |   | _
>> |   |   |/
>> |   |   |   |   TX Frontend: B
>> |   |   |   |   Name: FE-TX1
>> |   |   |   |   Antennas: TX/RX
>> |   |   |   |

[USRP-users] USRP B210 TX-Issues

2018-02-09 Thread Jonathan B via USRP-users

Hi everyone,

I seem to be having issues with the B210 transmitting at an incredibly low
power.

I seem to be getting a 60db difference at the receiver (spectrum analyzer)
between the B210 and N210 with perfectly identically configured
transmissions using the simple uhd "tx_waveform" example program.

Has anyone experienced such an issue. I have two B210s that seem to be
acting the same way.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,
Jonathan

-

Probe Output of the B210:

-- Loading firmware image: C:\Program
Files\GNURadio-3.7\share\uhd\images\usrp_b200_fw.hex...
-- Detected Device: B210
-- Loading FPGA image: C:\Program
Files\GNURadio-3.7\share\uhd\images\usrp_b210_fpga.bin... done
-- Operating over USB 3.
-- Detecting internal GPSDO No GPSDO found
-- Initialize CODEC control...
-- Initialize Radio control...
-- Performing register loopback test... pass
-- Performing register loopback test... pass
-- Performing CODEC loopback test... pass
-- Performing CODEC loopback test... pass
-- Setting master clock rate selection to 'automatic'.
-- Asking for clock rate 16.00 MHz...
-- Actually got clock rate 16.00 MHz.
-- Performing timer loopback test... pass
-- Performing timer loopback test... pass
  _
 /
|   Device: B-Series Device
| _
|/
|   |   Mboard: B210
|   |   revision: 4
|   |   product: 2
|   |   serial: 3113A66
|   |   name: MyB210
|   |   FW Version: 8.0
|   |   FPGA Version: 14.0
|   |
|   |   Time sources:  none, internal, external, gpsdo
|   |   Clock sources: internal, external, gpsdo
|   |   Sensors: ref_locked
|   | _
|   |/
|   |   |   RX DSP: 0
|   |   |
|   |   |   Freq range: -8.000 to 8.000 MHz
|   | _
|   |/
|   |   |   RX DSP: 1
|   |   |
|   |   |   Freq range: -8.000 to 8.000 MHz
|   | _
|   |/
|   |   |   RX Dboard: A
|   |   | _
|   |   |/
|   |   |   |   RX Frontend: A
|   |   |   |   Name: FE-RX2
|   |   |   |   Antennas: TX/RX, RX2
|   |   |   |   Sensors: temp, rssi, lo_locked
|   |   |   |   Freq range: 50.000 to 6000.000 MHz
|   |   |   |   Gain range PGA: 0.0 to 76.0 step 1.0 dB
|   |   |   |   Bandwidth range: 20.0 to 5600.0 step 0.0 Hz
|   |   |   |   Connection Type: IQ
|   |   |   |   Uses LO offset: No
|   |   | _
|   |   |/
|   |   |   |   RX Frontend: B
|   |   |   |   Name: FE-RX1
|   |   |   |   Antennas: TX/RX, RX2
|   |   |   |   Sensors: temp, rssi, lo_locked
|   |   |   |   Freq range: 50.000 to 6000.000 MHz
|   |   |   |   Gain range PGA: 0.0 to 76.0 step 1.0 dB
|   |   |   |   Bandwidth range: 20.0 to 5600.0 step 0.0 Hz
|   |   |   |   Connection Type: IQ
|   |   |   |   Uses LO offset: No
|   |   | _
|   |   |/
|   |   |   |   RX Codec: A
|   |   |   |   Name: B210 RX dual ADC
|   |   |   |   Gain Elements: None
|   | _
|   |/
|   |   |   TX DSP: 0
|   |   |
|   |   |   Freq range: -8.000 to 8.000 MHz
|   | _
|   |/
|   |   |   TX DSP: 1
|   |   |
|   |   |   Freq range: -8.000 to 8.000 MHz
|   | _
|   |/
|   |   |   TX Dboard: A
|   |   | _
|   |   |/
|   |   |   |   TX Frontend: A
|   |   |   |   Name: FE-TX2
|   |   |   |   Antennas: TX/RX
|   |   |   |   Sensors: temp, lo_locked
|   |   |   |   Freq range: 50.000 to 6000.000 MHz
|   |   |   |   Gain range PGA: 0.0 to 89.8 step 0.3 dB
|   |   |   |   Bandwidth range: 20.0 to 5600.0 step 0.0 Hz
|   |   |   |   Connection Type: IQ
|   |   |   |   Uses LO offset: No
|   |   | _
|   |   |/
|   |   |   |   TX Frontend: B
|   |   |   |   Name: FE-TX1
|   |   |   |   Antennas: TX/RX
|   |   |   |   Sensors: temp, lo_locked
|   |   |   |   Freq range: 50.000 to 6000.000 MHz
|   |   |   |   Gain range PGA: 0.0 to 89.8 step 0.3 dB
|   |   |   |   Bandwidth range: 20.0 to 5600.0 step 0.0 Hz
|   |   |   |   Connection Type: IQ
|   |   |   |   Uses LO offset: No
|   |   | _
|   |   |/
|   |   |   |   TX Codec: A
|   |   |   |   Name: B210 TX dual DAC
|   |   |   |   Gain Elements: None


Virus-free.
www.avast.com

Re: [USRP-users] UHD release vs. gnuradio release - compatibility table?

2018-02-09 Thread Martin Braun via USRP-users

Can confirm: If you're building GNU Radio from source, it'll work with
almost any version of UHD (note that on next branch, we've finally
bumped the minimum UHD version, but it's something like 3.5.5 or so).

-- M

On 02/01/2018 05:29 PM, Ron Economos via USRP-users wrote:
> I think the incompatibility issues folks have are due to trying to use
> gr-uhd (a component in GNU Radio) that was built against a certain
> version of UHD with a different version of UHD.
> 
> If you're building from source, you should be able to use pretty much
> any recent version of UHD with any recent version of GNU Radio.
> 
> I would suggest using a release tag for UHD instead of the maint branch.
> For example:
> 
> git checkout release_003_009_007
> 
> or
> 
> git checkout release_003_010_003_000
> 
> Ron W6RZ
> 
> 
> On 02/01/2018 10:23 AM, Tom McDermott via USRP-users wrote:
>> Thanks for the announcement of the new UHD 3.10.3 release.
>>
>> I've noticed on the gnuradio mailing list some comments about possible
>> incompatibility
>> of certain UHD versions and Gnuradio versions (assuming I'm reading
>> things correctly).
>>
>> Is there a table that lists compatibility of the various UHD branches
>> and tags
>> against gnuradio branches and tags?  Or a table of recommended
>> versions between
>> the two release streams?
>>
>> I am running gnuradio 3.7.11.1 maint    and UHD maint 122bfae  (which
>> is quite
>> a few behind).
>>
>>
>> -- Tom, N5EG
>>
>>
> 
> 
> ___
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

[USRP-users] Bandpass filters

2018-02-09 Thread Mathieu Petitjean via USRP-users

Hi everyone,

As a very newbie with SDRs, I want to use an USRP to listen to two
different, but close frequencies and distinguish them (the frequencies
are not fixed yet). I would like to implement two bandpass filters and
look at the output of both filters, but I am not sure how to proceed. Is
it feasible using the UHD C++ libraries ?

Thanks,

Mathieu



___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Re: [USRP-users] Process IQ samples in real time using gnuradio

2018-02-09 Thread ALEJANDRO BLANCO PIZARRO via USRP-users

Hi all,

Thank for the alternatives. I will think about it.

Best regards,
Alejandro

El 8 feb. 2018 3:37 p. m., "Manuel Uhm via USRP-users" <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> escribió:

> Hi Alejandro.
>
> To confirm one of Marcus' comments, unfortunately, The MathWorks do not
> yet have support for TwinRX. We are expecting TwinRX support in release 18b
> later this year.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Manuel
>
>
>
> From: Marcus Müller via USRP-users
> Sent: Thursday, February 8, 4:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Process IQ samples in real time using gnuradio
> To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
>
>
> Hi Alejandro, so, if you want to process streams of data, Matlab alone
> really isn't the way to go, if you ask me. With simulink, you might put
> your matlab code into a processing block and stream your data through that.
> The SDRu toolbox that Mathworks offers has USRP support, so you wouldn't
> need GNU Radio. I'm not sure it already supports the twinRX yet, to be
> honest. Another option is to take your matlab code, and let matlab generate
> C/C++ code from that, and build a GNU Radio block that uses that code. This
> might or might not be awkward :) Personally, I think that a hybrid solution
> is often the most reasonable approach: If you have something that needs to
> be done in real-time, do it in GNU Radio; if it's analysis that can /
> should be done afterwards, do it in Matlab. That is a tool that comes with
> great, great signal processing toolboxes! Notice that four channels of 80
> MHz coming from an X310+2×TwinRX is *very much data* (in fact, it's more
> than 12 Gbps). Unoptimized .m-code will probably not be anything that you
> want to push this through. Best regards, Marcus On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 10:51
> +0100, ALEJANDRO BLANCO PIZARRO via USRP- users wrote: > Dear community, >
> > I would like to process in Matlab IQ samples generated by a USRP x310 >
> (2 twinRX) using gnuradio. Instead of saving them in a file and to >
> process later, it is possible to send them to matlab and process in > real
> time? > > Thank in advance. Best regards, > Alejandro >
> ___ > USRP-users mailing list
> > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com > http://lists.ettus.com/
> mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com 
> ___
> USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/
> mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
>
> ___
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
>
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Re: [USRP-users] "Additional signa"l after a packet transmission

2018-02-09 Thread NAVES Raphael via USRP-users


Hello,

For more details, please find attached the received signal in the time 
domain. Clearly after the end of the packet, the signal takes a certain 
time to come back to "the ambient noise". If I zoom, I notice there is 
still some noise 40ms after the packet. It can disturb the reception of 
the following packet if its power is less than this additional noise.


What do you suggest to cancel it ? I'm using the USRP sink/source 
blocks from gnuradio for the transmission/reception parts.


Best,

Raphaël


On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 21:48:10 +0100, NAVES Raphael via USRP-users wrote:

Hello Dan,

Thanks for your answer. I'm using for transmitting the traditional
USRP sink block provided by Gnuradio Companion. Each packet coming to
this block is tagged with its length at the first sample. For the
receiving part, I'm using the USRP source block. Both are used with
basic parameters.

Do you think I should modify/use different parameters for these 
blocks ?


Raphaël

On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:54:07 -0500, Dan Veeneman wrote:

Hello Rafael,

Are you sure the transmitter has stopped radiating immediately after 
the

end of a packet?  The power amplifier on the transmitter may take a
small amount of time to go from powered up to powered down, although 
40

milliseconds may be excessive.

Do you have a writeup and/or code for your burst transmission system
(transmitter and receiver), that perhaps others may be able to 
duplicate

the issue?


Regards,
Dan


On 2/8/2018 11:33 AM, NAVES Raphael via USRP-users wrote:

Hello everyone,

I implemented a burst transmission between two USRP N210. The
transmission and the packet receiving works well, however I'm 
facing the

following problem. From the reception side, I notice that after the
packet receiving, the sampling signal does not come back to the 
ambient
noise immediatly. It takes few milliseconds (about 40 ms) to come 
back
to "0". It's like if there is still a signal transmitted after the 
real
packet transmission. It may be a problem when you want to receive 
many

consecutive packets with few space between them

 I suppose that it comes from an hardware problem when the signal 
is put
on the baseband ? Does that deal with the LO leakage ? What can we 
do to

avoid this additional signal ?

Thanks,


Raphaël

___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com



___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Re: [USRP-users] E310/E312 Receive on all 4 inputs

[USRP-users] E310/E312 Receive on all 4 inputs

Re: [USRP-users] USRP B210 TX-Issues

Re: [USRP-users] USRP B210 TX-Issues

[USRP-users] USRP B210 TX-Issues

Re: [USRP-users] UHD release vs. gnuradio release - compatibility table?

[USRP-users] Bandpass filters

Re: [USRP-users] Process IQ samples in real time using gnuradio

Re: [USRP-users] "Additional signa"l after a packet transmission

9 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information