[vdr] MainMenuHooks in vdr-1.6.0?

2008-02-05 Thread Christian Wieninger
Hi Klaus,

is there a chance to have this patch

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.vdr/32212

in 1.6.0? Several plugins already support this patch and most VDR 
distributions have this too, imho. Would be great to have it in core VDR.

BR,

Christian


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] MainMenuHooks in vdr-1.6.0?

2008-02-05 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 02/05/08 09:47, Christian Wieninger wrote:
 Hi Klaus,
 
 is there a chance to have this patch
 
 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.vdr/32212
 
 in 1.6.0? Several plugins already support this patch and most VDR 
 distributions have this too, imho. Would be great to have it in core VDR.

The main menu handling will be revised at some point, anyway,
so that the user can take complete control over its content.
Therefore I am not going to adopt this at this time.

Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] MainMenuHooks in vdr-1.6.0?

2008-02-05 Thread Frank Enderle
/vote: yes 

a really useful patch.

On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:47:32 +0100, Christian Wieninger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Hi Klaus,
 
 is there a chance to have this patch
 
 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.vdr/32212
 
 in 1.6.0? Several plugins already support this patch and most VDR
 distributions have this too, imho. Would be great to have it in core VDR.
 
 BR,
 
 Christian
 
 
 ___
 vdr mailing list
 vdr@linuxtv.org
 http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] MainMenuHooks in vdr-1.6.0?

2008-02-05 Thread Reiner Buehl
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Klaus Schmidinger
 Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:37 AM
 To: vdr@linuxtv.org
 Subject: Re: [vdr] MainMenuHooks in vdr-1.6.0?
 
 On 02/05/08 09:47, Christian Wieninger wrote:
  Hi Klaus,
  
  is there a chance to have this patch
  
  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.vdr/32212
  
  in 1.6.0? Several plugins already support this patch and most VDR 
  distributions have this too, imho. Would be great to have 
 it in core VDR.
 
 The main menu handling will be revised at some point, anyway,
 so that the user can take complete control over its content.
 Therefore I am not going to adopt this at this time.

Will the integration of this (and other similar patches) harm in any way?
I do not see why they could not be used to provide an apparently missing
functionallity until you find the time to revise the code the way you like. 
The code is used widely, it is already available as a patch and you can 
still revise it any time you want...

Best regards,
Reiner.


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Howto vdr-xine installation

2008-02-05 Thread serge pecher
Thanks, exactly what I was looking for

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Magnus
Hörlin
Verzonden: maandag 4 februari 2008 13:50
Aan: 'VDR Mailing List'
Onderwerp: Re: [vdr] Howto vdr-xine installation

Sorry, I meant:
http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/OpenSUSE_VDR_DVB-S2_-_xine
/Magnus H


Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För serge
pecher
Skickat: den 4 februari 2008 13:07
Till: 'VDR Mailing List'
Ämne: [vdr] Howto vdr-xine installation

Hello,

I used to use the “opensuse dvb-s2” wiki page to follow the instructions
about the installation of xine-lib 1.2 and vdr-xine.
When I am looking for that page, I get an empty page now.
Can anyone point me out a location where to find the download commands (cvs
or hg ?) and the several compile instructions and options.

Many thanks,

serge


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] DVB-T card on the move

2008-02-05 Thread Rainer Zocholl
[EMAIL PROTECTED](Malte Forkel)  05.02.08 08:11


 So how can i nail this moving DVB-T card to a fixed postition?


You might try to blacklist the driver modules used for the cards in
/etc/modprobe.d/blacklist and then enter them in /etc/modules in an
order of your liking. If you can read German, have a look at
http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/Reihenfolge_der_DVB-Treiber_fest
legen.

Good luck, Malte

Thanks. the  link sounds good, and can era german (and sometimes 
understand it ;-)

I too had funny effect with:
RemotePlugin Mplayer 
because of that move.

I ran 1.4.3 in
http://www.vdr-portal.de/board/thread.php?postid=479909#post479909
is stated that vdr_1.4.0-1ctvdr2_i386 had fixed the problem.


They recommand to hack /usr/sbin/runvdr


function get_modulenames()
{
if [ $KVERS_2_6 ]; then
MODULES=`lsmod | awk '/^dvb_core/ {gsub(/,/,\n, $4); print $4}' | tac`
[ $MODULES ]  MODULES=$MODULES dvb_core
else
MODULES=`lsmod | grep dvb-core | cut -d'[' -f2 | cut -d']' -f1`
[ $MODULES ]  MODULES=$MODULES dvb-core
fi
}


RAINER---= Vertraulich
 //  
   //  
 =--ocholl, Kiel, Germany 


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] MainMenuHooks in vdr-1.6.0?

2008-02-05 Thread Joachim Wilke
2008/2/5, Reiner Buehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Will the integration of this (and other similar patches) harm in any way?

Yes. A stable version needs a feature freeze to get stable. Otherwise
we could continue as before.

Regards,
Joachim.

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] DVB-T card on the move

2008-02-05 Thread Rainer Zocholl
[EMAIL PROTECTED](Theunis Potgieter)  05.02.08 06:13


udev rules

Yes, i know ;-)

can i pin the card to the MAC address like any other network card?

If how?


Rainer


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] MainMenuHooks in vdr-1.6.0?

2008-02-05 Thread Christian Wieninger
Joachim Wilke wrote:
 2008/2/5, Reiner Buehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   
 Will the integration of this (and other similar patches) harm in any way?
 

 Yes. A stable version needs a feature freeze to get stable. Otherwise
 we could continue as before.

   
this was the reason to ask now, since we do not already have the stable 
1.6.0 ;-)
The patch is one year old and well tested.

Regards,

Christian


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Straw poll: stable version 1.6.0 now?

2008-02-05 Thread Arthur Konovalov
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
 On 02/03/08 12:06, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
 Is the CAM Handling regarding multiple parallel recodings (on the same 
 channel) fixed?
 
 Have you tried version 1.5 yet?
 
 It can do multiple parallel recordings with the same CAM (if the
 CAM supports this).

I still have problem with it.
Recording on crypted channel is not possible when watching FTA DVB-C on 
the same frequency.
Same situation works fine on vdr-1.4.x environment.


Regards,
Arthur

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Straw poll: stable version 1.6.0 now?

2008-02-05 Thread Peter Münster
On Sun, Feb 03 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
 
 Yes or No?

No, because 1.4.7 is quite good enough today for most users and
distributions, and those who need more can compile 1.5.X with additional
kernel drivers. So you don't need to bother with 2 branches (1.6 and 1.7).
Cheers, Peter

-- 
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] DVB-T card on the move

2008-02-05 Thread Udo Richter
Theunis Potgieter wrote:
 udev rules

Any good rules that could be used as a starting point?

I thought of doing this with udev, but there are some obstacles for 
that: First, a DVB device has several device files, not just one. And 
second, the usual trick to add a custom name as symlink doesn't work 
since VDR only accepts /dev/dvb/adapterX/, so /dev/dvb/myprimarycard/ is 
out.

Cheers,

Udo

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


[vdr] VDR SC - Problem with Irdeto 1 provider id

2008-02-05 Thread Hawes, Mark
Hi, 

I am trying to use SC version 8.7 to decrypt an Irdeto 1 stream using a
valid set of card credentials. I have placed these credentials in my
IRD-BETA.KID file using the format specified in the examples.
Specifically for the provider ID field I  have used the value 10.
However, SC does not see the keys for these credentials, although they
are clearly being provided as can be seen in an EMM log, and ProgDVB /
Fenrir are able to use this IRD-BETA.KID file to successfully provide
plain keys in windows.

After some playing around I discovered that I could get SC to recognise
the keys if I set the provider ID field to 01. The ca.cache file is
updated accordingly with the plain keys in the cache also having the
value 01 for the provider ID, but SC does not attempt to use them.
Manually changing the provider ID back to 10 in the cache file gives
me pictures while the plain keys remain current.

After some more playing I finally got things to work by patching
cPlainKeys::NewKey in data.c to multiply the provided Id by 16
immediately on entry, but this is now using a non-standard IRD-BETA.KID
file.

I believe that the problem may reside in cProviderIrdeto::MatchEMM which
is returning false unless I use the modified .KID file. However, I am
not sure how this code in parse.c is supposed to work.

While I now have pictures it would be nice not to have to use a
non-standard IRD-BETA.KID and a home grown patch. 

Any one have any ideas? 

Thanks, 

Mark Hawes.



This is an email from Fujitsu Australia Limited, ABN 19 001 011 427. It is 
confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was 
addressed and may contain copyright and/or legally privileged information. No 
one else may read, print, store, copy or forward all or any of it or its 
attachments. If you receive this email in error, please return to sender. Thank 
you.
 
If you do not wish to receive commercial email messages from Fujitsu Australia 
Limited, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Straw poll: stable version 1.6.0 now?

2008-02-05 Thread Antti Hartikainen
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:06:13PM +0200, Arthur Konovalov wrote:
  Have you tried version 1.5 yet?
  
  It can do multiple parallel recordings with the same CAM (if the
  CAM supports this).
 
 I still have problem with it.
 Recording on crypted channel is not possible when watching FTA DVB-C on 
 the same frequency.
 Same situation works fine on vdr-1.4.x environment.

I agree, this was main reason to go back to 1.4.x for me, because it was 
impossible to watch/record FTA channels while recording on encrypted channel.

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr