Re: [vdr] Can't compile VDR

2009-01-14 Thread user . vdr
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Chris Silva 2manybi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm having problems compiling VDR 1.7.0 and 1.7.3.

 This is the error:

 /usr/local/src/s2-liplianin/linux/include/linux/videodev2.h:64:28:
 error: linux/compiler.h: No such file or directory
 In file included from
 /usr/local/src/s2-liplianin/linux/include/linux/videodev.h:16,
 from dvbdevice.c:13:

Starting with the first error, try this:
cp /usr/src/linux/include/linux/compiler.h
/usr/local/src/s2-liplianin/linux/include/linux

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-12 Thread user . vdr
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Magnus Hörlin mag...@alefors.se wrote:
 Thanks. There aren't too many projects of this magnitude that responds
 this quickly to user wishes. Even though I would have liked to see
 teletext subs recorded by default and multiple frontend support I
 fully understand your priorities.

Why not 'include teletext/closed-captioning in recordings?' as a setup option?

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Minimal VDR install

2009-01-12 Thread user . vdr
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Chris Silva 2manybi...@gmail.com wrote:
 The ideia is to have a lightweight system installed on a usb pen
 (almost all files are read only, so no problem) and add one or more
 HDD drives to perform the recording. Those drivers will only work when
 a recording is scheduled. Thus reducing noise to the minimum.
 Currently I have almost no dB coming from my vdr box, except for the
 disks.

I used to do this with a usb flashdrive but have switched to
CompactFlash connected with a CF-SATA controller.  Also only have one
drive in the box for recording (which I'll move to my fileserver
eventually).  For the harddrive I just set a spindown timeout so it
goes to sleep when not in use.

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Color keys replacement

2009-01-10 Thread user . vdr
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Alex Betis alex.be...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 A question regarding the color keys functionality in VDR.
 Some remotes I see in shops don't have the color keys, is there any
 replacement key for those?
 Is it possible to map them to 1,2,3,4? Can you think of a scenario both
 color keys and numbers might be used in the same menu?

You can map any function to any key you want.  One example of numbers
 colors being used in the same menu is the main menu itself.  Numbers
take you straight to sub-menus or plugins while the color keys perform
functions like start recording or change the audio pid.

My advice, just buy a remote with the color keys and save yourself some hassle!

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Roadmap for VDR 1.8

2009-01-10 Thread user . vdr
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Nicolas Huillard nico...@huillard.net wrote:
 Another thing I've learned is that Klaus never (AFAIK) discussed roadmap
 details or made his own task list public ;-)

Yeah, that too.  Which has driven some of us crazy but I can't
honestly say I'd be any different if I were Klaus.  There's something
about setting your own schedule/priorities that's more appealing then
answering to peoples expectations.  The good news is that he's willing
to shuffle the TODO list if there's more urgent things to take care
(as with HDTV and h264 support for example).

Like I said, I've ran mostly dev versions of VDR for years with little
to no problems but be advised that your experience may vary.

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Choice of recording format

2009-01-10 Thread user . vdr
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
 I was just wondering what prompted the move from recording in PES to TS.
 Is it because TS is more widely supported? And how does it solve the
 problem of BBC HD having the wrong PID for audio?

 And why TS instead of PS? Is it because PS needs a header which is
 difficult to generate before all the packets intended for it are
 available (and hence difficulties overlapping playback and recording)?
 Or is it because the way recordings are played back makes TS more
 appropriate?

Switching to TS has been a point of much discussion so you'll find
plenty of answers if you search the ml (archive).

Btw, any errors on the providers part should be fixed @ the provider,
not within VDR.  If I'm not mistaken they've already contacted them
regarding the pid issue, though I don't know what/if came out of it.

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Roadmap for VDR 1.8

2009-01-09 Thread user . vdr
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Artem Makhutov ar...@makhutov.org wrote:
 What points have to be done to finish 1.7.x and to get to 1.8.0.

In the years I've been using VDR, there has always been many
development versions before Klaus has released a new stable so based
on past experience, I wouldn't expect to see 1.8.0 any time soon.
There are some big changes in 1.7.x and I guess it could go either
way.  He might want to release a new stable after the major stuff has
been implimented and tested, saving the little things for the next
development line.  Or he could just take it slow  easy.

One nice thing I've learned is that most dev versions are pretty damn
stable themselves.  I've been running dev versions probably 90%+ of
the time on my main vdr box.  :)

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Which extension for TS files?

2009-01-04 Thread user . vdr
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Diego Pierotto vdr_ml...@tiscali.it wrote:
 Klaus Schmidinger ha scritto:
 Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files.
 While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to
 use a different file name extension, and so was wondering which one
 to use. My first idea was *.ts, for Transport Stream, but when I
 point, for instance, Konqueror to such a file, it thinks it is a
 Qt Translation Source. So I was wondering if I should use *.mpg
 instead. This one is identified by Konqueror as an MPEG file and
 will make it launch a proper player.

The obvious choice is of course .ts as every app I've ever seen/used
that handles transport streams uses it by default.  Using .mpg would
be wrong for the reasons already stated.  The extention (.ts, .avi,
.mkv, etc) should designate the contianer, not the contents.

I don't see why VDR should have to worry Konqueror's problems.  If the
Konqueror devs made the mistake of assuming *.ts is a quicktime file,
it's up to them to fix it, not VDR to do something goofy to compensate
for it!  Or if Konqueror offers an option like 'Open With' with and a
'always use this' checkbox like Windows Explorer then users can
control it themselves.

If this is a vote, then I say .ts without question.

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] HVR-4000, vdr-1.7.2 and v4l-dvb'hg ?

2008-12-31 Thread user . vdr
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Gregoire Favre
gregoire.fa...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 03:21:50PM +0200, Mika Laitio wrote:

 Hello,

 Does hvr-4000 tune for you to dvb-s channels if you do not apply the h264
 patch? That's the case for me. I send previously an email from similar
 experiences to

 http://www.mail-archive.com/vdr@linuxtv.org/msg08635.html

 Unfortunately I can't tune either without the h264 patch.

The good news then is that Reinhard Nissl has updated the h264 patch
for vdr-1.7.2!  You can find it in the thread with the title
[ANNOUNCE] H.264 support for VDR-1.7.2.

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr