Re: [Veritas-bu] x64 clients - partially successful backups
Title: Message What version of NetBackup are you running, and what Maintenance Pack, as I know there are issues if your system is not up to date (off top of my head, cannot recall what MP you need) Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Shyam Hazari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 June 2006 21:07To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] x64 clients - partially successful backups This is the error message in netbackup logs. WRN - can't open object: Shadow Copy Components:\System Service\Removable Storage Manager (BEDS 0xFED1: ) Error message in event viewer on the client. Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Writer Removable Storage Manager did not respond to a GatherWriterStatus call . Any idea how to get this fixed. Also checked the archives, couldn't find a solution. TIA -Shyam This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] x64 clients - partially successful backups
Title: Message Shyam also found this here, maybe it might help, or maybe not ? Worth a look I think http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/247001.htm Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Shyam Hazari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 June 2006 21:07To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] x64 clients - partially successful backups This is the error message in netbackup logs. WRN - can't open object: Shadow Copy Components:\System Service\Removable Storage Manager (BEDS 0xFED1: ) Error message in event viewer on the client. Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Writer Removable Storage Manager did not respond to a GatherWriterStatus call . Any idea how to get this fixed. Also checked the archives, couldn't find a solution. TIA -Shyam This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6 and shell scripts question
Title: Message As long as they are in the "Bin" folder of your netbackup client - it should be ok :-) Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Dustin D'Amour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2006 00:05To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6 and shell scripts question Thanks to all who replied on the issue below. Hopefully I put the commands in the correct place to shutdown the services, I will not know until the maintenance window later in the night. Dustin D'Amour Coyote Solutions Group 505.742.0066 www.coyotesolutions.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin D'AmourSent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:41 PMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6 and shell scripts question Is there a way to have NetBackup initiate a shell script to shutdown services then after that is completed the backup starts. After the backup finishes have NetBackup initiate another script which restarts the services? Running NetBackup server on Suse Enterprise 9 and the client in the question is on Solaris 8. Dustin D'Amour Coyote Solutions Group 505.742.0066 www.coyotesolutions.com This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Quick Question - NetBackup for Windows - Does it need permissions
Title: Message To clarify NBU 5.1 Win2k3 OS - A user had full control on folder and removed ALL other admin / system accounts - although I cannot check this, I wanted to verify if NetBackup has a way to STILL perform the backup even though its the user account listed as full control for a folder. Thanks ! Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Quick Question - NetBackup for Windows - Does it need permissions
Title: Message Hello Simon, as long as the client service on your server runs under SYSTEM credentials you should not experience any problems. Regards Martin Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von WEAVER, SimonGesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 09:48An: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduBetreff: [Veritas-bu] Quick Question - NetBackup for Windows - Does it need permissions To clarify NBU 5.1 Win2k3 OS - A user had full control on folder and removed ALL other admin / system accounts - although I cannot check this, I wanted to verify if NetBackup has a way to STILL perform the backup even though its the user account listed as full control for a folder. Thanks ! Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 on Cummulative Incremental
U not looked into, but how much space is on D:? Have you attempted to reboot the client lately and re-try? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2006 09:25 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 on Cummulative Incremental Hello, Does anybody experienced this failure? Client Windows 2000 Full Backup on System State, C: and D: runs well Cumulative Incremental on System State and C: runs well too Cummulative Incremental on D: always fails with Status 14 (file write failed) Open File Backup is disabled Master Solaris 5.0 MP4 Client Windows 2000 5.0 MP4 Thanks Martin ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 on Cummulative Incremental
Total size is 680 GB with 38 GB free. Rebootet several times. All drivers are up to date. Regards Martin -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 10:58 An: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Betreff: RE: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 on Cummulative Incremental U not looked into, but how much space is on D:? Have you attempted to reboot the client lately and re-try? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2006 09:25 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 on Cummulative Incremental Hello, Does anybody experienced this failure? Client Windows 2000 Full Backup on System State, C: and D: runs well Cumulative Incremental on System State and C: runs well too Cummulative Incremental on D: always fails with Status 14 (file write failed) Open File Backup is disabled Master Solaris 5.0 MP4 Client Windows 2000 5.0 MP4 Thanks Martin ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 on Cummulative Incremental
Martin What sort of files are on here? Any AV running? Is tracker.exe running on the box? If so turn them both off? What about Network configuration - is this all set to max throughput and not auto / auto? Could be a Network related issue! You also mentioned VSS / VSP is turned off correct? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2006 10:23 To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: AW: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 on Cummulative Incremental Total size is 680 GB with 38 GB free. Rebootet several times. All drivers are up to date. Regards Martin -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 10:58 An: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Betreff: RE: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 on Cummulative Incremental U not looked into, but how much space is on D:? Have you attempted to reboot the client lately and re-try? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2006 09:25 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 on Cummulative Incremental Hello, Does anybody experienced this failure? Client Windows 2000 Full Backup on System State, C: and D: runs well Cumulative Incremental on System State and C: runs well too Cummulative Incremental on D: always fails with Status 14 (file write failed) Open File Backup is disabled Master Solaris 5.0 MP4 Client Windows 2000 5.0 MP4 Thanks Martin ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies
Title: Message Netbackup uses a combination of Policy name and archive bit. If you restart broken jobs within another policy next time policy 1 will not recognize that the jobs was already done. Martin Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von WEAVER, SimonGesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 11:37An: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduBetreff: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Guys A quick question again about Policies Scenario: One Policy does Weekly Full backups and Cum Incr. - Policy Name is SERVER 1 I have created a 2nd Policy named SERVER1_MANUAL, same settings as SERVER1, but this time not specified any drives \ folders to backup. If a stream fails on the FULL Backup in the SERVER1 Policy, could I enable the 2nd policy to backup the stream that failed? Although this would work, I am starting to think that when the SERVER1 Policy runs an incremental, it will treat the streams that failed the full backup as a full backup and continue to do so until a Full Backup has run at the end of the week. Does that make sense? :-) Any guidance on this would be great, as I want to narrow down how many policies I have. Finally, if I get a failed stream, is there a way to KICK OFF just a single stream if the window has closed? What I do is kick off a MANUAL FULL, and kill the streams that I dont need a full backup of. Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies
Title: Message Martin Now that was my understanding! so really, I may as well kick off a failed job within the SAME policy. But can you kick off a STREAM rather than the whole lot? (job has 8 streams) Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2006 11:31To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: AW: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Netbackup uses a combination of Policy name and archive bit. If you restart broken jobs within another policy next time policy 1 will not recognize that the jobs was already done. Martin Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von WEAVER, SimonGesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 11:37An: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduBetreff: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Guys A quick question again about Policies Scenario: One Policy does Weekly Full backups and Cum Incr. - Policy Name is SERVER 1 I have created a 2nd Policy named SERVER1_MANUAL, same settings as SERVER1, but this time not specified any drives \ folders to backup. If a stream fails on the FULL Backup in the SERVER1 Policy, could I enable the 2nd policy to backup the stream that failed? Although this would work, I am starting to think that when the SERVER1 Policy runs an incremental, it will treat the streams that failed the full backup as a full backup and continue to do so until a Full Backup has run at the end of the week. Does that make sense? :-) Any guidance on this would be great, as I want to narrow down how many policies I have. Finally, if I get a failed stream, is there a way to KICK OFF just a single stream if the window has closed? What I do is kick off a MANUAL FULL, and kill the streams that I dont need a full backup of. Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Status 84 errors after ADIC i2000 upgraded to i4 firmware
Greetings, Has anyone else experience Status 84 errors after upgrading the firmware on their ADIC i2000 to i4 (4.4.2 or 4.3.x)? We didn't have the problem on i3, and it went away when we downgraded the version. The other half of this equation is that along with the robot firmware, our IBM LTO2 drives firmware were upgraded from 4AP0 to 5AT0. We downgraded the drive firmware along with the robot firmware. Regards, Kent C. Eagle Systems Engineer, MCP, MCSE Tech Services / SMSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our website at www.wilmingtontrust.com Investment products are not insured by the FDIC or any other governmental agency, are not deposits of or other obligations of or guaranteed by Wilmington Trust or any other bank or entity, and are subject to risks, including a possible loss of the principal amount invested. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and/or proprietary information. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity who is the intended recipient. Unauthorized use of this information is prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender by replying to this message and delete this material from any system it may be on. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies
Title: Message No, as far as I know. You have to start the whole job and cancel the stream that you don't need Von: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 13:13An: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduBetreff: RE: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Martin Now that was my understanding! so really, I may as well kick off a failed job within the SAME policy. But can you kick off a STREAM rather than the whole lot? (job has 8 streams) Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2006 11:31To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: AW: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Netbackup uses a combination of Policy name and archive bit. If you restart broken jobs within another policy next time policy 1 will not recognize that the jobs was already done. Martin Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von WEAVER, SimonGesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 11:37An: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduBetreff: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Guys A quick question again about Policies Scenario: One Policy does Weekly Full backups and Cum Incr. - Policy Name is SERVER 1 I have created a 2nd Policy named SERVER1_MANUAL, same settings as SERVER1, but this time not specified any drives \ folders to backup. If a stream fails on the FULL Backup in the SERVER1 Policy, could I enable the 2nd policy to backup the stream that failed? Although this would work, I am starting to think that when the SERVER1 Policy runs an incremental, it will treat the streams that failed the full backup as a full backup and continue to do so until a Full Backup has run at the end of the week. Does that make sense? :-) Any guidance on this would be great, as I want to narrow down how many policies I have. Finally, if I get a failed stream, is there a way to KICK OFF just a single stream if the window has closed? What I do is kick off a MANUAL FULL, and kill the streams that I dont need a full backup of. Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies
Title: Message Martin B!! Thats not good is it :-((( but it what I have been doing ! Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2006 13:53To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: AW: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies No, as far as I know. You have to start the whole job and cancel the stream that you don't need Von: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 13:13An: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduBetreff: RE: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Martin Now that was my understanding! so really, I may as well kick off a failed job within the SAME policy. But can you kick off a STREAM rather than the whole lot? (job has 8 streams) Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2006 11:31To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: AW: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Netbackup uses a combination of Policy name and archive bit. If you restart broken jobs within another policy next time policy 1 will not recognize that the jobs was already done. Martin Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von WEAVER, SimonGesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 11:37An: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduBetreff: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Guys A quick question again about Policies Scenario: One Policy does Weekly Full backups and Cum Incr. - Policy Name is SERVER 1 I have created a 2nd Policy named SERVER1_MANUAL, same settings as SERVER1, but this time not specified any drives \ folders to backup. If a stream fails on the FULL Backup in the SERVER1 Policy, could I enable the 2nd policy to backup the stream that failed? Although this would work, I am starting to think that when the SERVER1 Policy runs an incremental, it will treat the streams that failed the full backup as a full backup and continue to do so until a Full Backup has run at the end of the week. Does that make sense? :-) Any guidance on this would be great, as I want to narrow down how many policies I have. Finally, if I get a failed stream, is there a way to KICK OFF just a single stream if the window has closed? What I do is kick off a MANUAL FULL, and kill the streams that I dont need a full backup of. Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
Re: [Veritas-bu] x64 clients - partially successful backups
Title: Message Welcome! Good Luck Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Shyam Hazari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2006 13:25To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] x64 clients - partially successful backups Thanx to Richard Mansell and Simon Weaver for pointing me in the right direction. It got fixed by excluding C:\WINDOWS\system32\Ntmsdata\ This list is awesome. Thanx -Shyam On 6/28/06, Mansell, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shyam We got error messages from some servers regarding RSM and just excluded the ntmsdata directory http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/247001.htm Regards Richard **This electronic email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. The views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Christchurch City Council.If you are not the correct recipient of this email please advise thesender and delete.Christchurch City Councilhttp://www.ccc.govt.nz** ___Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu On 6/29/06, WEAVER, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shyam also found this here, maybe it might help, or maybe not ? Worth a look I think http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/247001.htm Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging in Netbackup Ver 6.0 MP2
Title: Message Karl So will I be correct in my conclusion that with Ver 6.0 and MP2 in a complete Sun Solaris environment I cannot create Disk staging Storage UNIT (DSSU) ??? But can just create Disk Storage UNIT (DSU)? If this indeed is true than this really sucks! Maybe I can backout of MP2 to get this feature. Thanks Sandeep -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:32 PMCc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging in Netbackup Ver 6.0 MP2[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/28/2006 02:06:16 PM: Hi Have Netbackup Server Base Edition Ver 6.0 + MP2 installed and configured on my UNIX machines. Have One master as well as Media configured to backup 25 clients. Wanted to create a DSU for temporary disk staging area to be dumped to tapes at a later time. Follow the procedure given in the docs to create the DSU but I just do not see the "Low Water Mark" stuff enabled for me to anything nor do I see any checkbox to state that this is a temp staging area. I thought that functionality of disk staging was available under Netbackup Server Base Edition. I'm guessing you mean DSSU. Anyway, i have noticed that you can no longer set the high and low water mark with MP2. Specifically using the Windows Gui connecting to a Unix master/media. I'm pretty sure you could set it in MP1 and GA. MP3 ;) should be out any day now. Karl-Frédéric Rossing, Technical Services phone: 204-786-6431 fax: 204-784-6755 toll free: 1-800-665-1934 www.federated.ca CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual(s) or organization(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email and its attachments from your system. Thank you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] determining size of last full backup of each policy
I'm going through a sizing exercise right now and need to determine how much data each full backup represents. Before re-inventing the wheel, does anyone have any quick and dirty ways of accomplishing this? Thanks, Steve ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] determining size of last full backup of each policy
Well one way would be:
echo | mail -s $(/bin/hostname | cut -f1 -d'.'):
$(/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bperror -all -hoursago 24 | grep
successfully wrote backup id | awk '{Kbytes= Kbytes + $18/1024/1024} END
{print Backed up,Kbytes,Gigabytes}') For ($yesterday - $today)
Grep for the appropriate policies/clients.
Second way, modify the perl script bpreport.pl which you can find on the
archives of this list, does some cool things as well.
Ultimately though, if you don't use one of those two, if you kept the job
information in the activity monitor and each job was a full backup, you
could just run bpdbjobs and grab the size of the last backup, grepping for
full.
No real easy way to accomplish this apparently.
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Steven L. Sesar wrote:
I'm going through a sizing exercise right now and need to determine how
much data each full backup represents. Before re-inventing the wheel,
does anyone have any quick and dirty ways of accomplishing this?
Thanks,
Steve
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] determining size of last full backup of each policy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You could always run bpimmedia and specify a schedule type and and date/time range. The rows that start with FRAG, the fourth field is kilobytes. Query, sum, report... Thanks Peter Peter DrakeUnderkoffler Xinupro, LLC 617-834-2352 Steven L. Sesar wrote: I'm going through a sizing exercise right now and need to determine how much data each full backup represents. Before re-inventing the wheel, does anyone have any quick and dirty ways of accomplishing this? Thanks, Steve ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEo+P/l+lekZRM55oRAvjEAJ9Wo+/7TMxJlC/IjZf4Yh5nRf5pyQCgpgl0 uAZt/hBDenoxtrW1zm8YLVI= =VJJE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP2 Shared Memory Issue?
Admins, We have one 6.0 MP2 Master/Media server running on Solaris 10. The server has been running fine for a while (uptime: 19 days). I was running debug vxlog (level 6) logging. I also had the bplogs (open/netbackup/logs/bpxyz) cranked up to five but turned all that down to one yesterday. Restarted netbackup. A good portion of our backups did not run correctly last night. Here is some of the more salient entries in the problem log. system call failed - Not enough space (at bpdm.c.3311) could not allocate enough shared memory for backup buffers backup of client xyz exited with status 89 (problems encountered during setup of shared memory) Now here is what i have found confusing, Solaris 10 now has resource controls for most of their shared memory settings. For example, setting msginfo_msgmnb has no effect: * NOTE: As of Solaris 10, System V IPC tunables are unnecessary. The * msginfo_msgmnb tunable has been replaced with a resource control; * the assignment below has been left to provide compatibility with your * previous settings. For more details, see the Solaris 10 What's New * document, or the Solaris Tunable Parameters Reference Manual. set msgsys:msginfo_msgmnb=65536 I'm waiting for veritas technical support engineer to get back to me. I'm left wondering if there is an issue with MP2. Have you run into a problem with MP2 shared memory? Karl-Frédéric Rossing, Technical Services phone: 204-786-6431 fax: 204-784-6755 toll free: 1-800-665-1934 www.federated.ca CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual(s) or organization(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email and its attachments from your system. Thank you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] determining size of last full backup of each policy
The problem is, and I probably wasn't clear about this in my original
post, is that I need *unique* full backups. Some of our backup policies,
ie Oracle and Exchange, contain only full backup schedules. Something
like this will result in *all* fulls taken during a given time period.
Thanks for all of your responses!
King, Cheryl wrote:
I use bpimagelist and change the parms depending on what I need. You
can do it by type, full incremental, policy etc. Change the dates and
times for your window of course.
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bpimagelist -l -st FULL -d 1l/25/05
21:00:00 -e 11/28/05 08:00:00 | grep IMAGE | awk '{ tot+=$19} END {
printf Backed up %9.0f KiloBytes in the last FULL backup\n,tot }'
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
L. Sesar
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 8:02 AM
To: NetBackup Veritas
Subject: [Veritas-bu] determining size of last full backup of each
policy
I'm going through a sizing exercise right now and need to determine how
much data each full backup represents. Before re-inventing the wheel,
does anyone have any quick and dirty ways of accomplishing this?
Thanks,
Steve
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] determining size of last full backup of each policy
I use bpimagelist and change the parms depending on what I need. You
can do it by type, full incremental, policy etc. Change the dates and
times for your window of course.
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bpimagelist -l -st FULL -d 1l/25/05
21:00:00 -e 11/28/05 08:00:00 | grep IMAGE | awk '{ tot+=$19} END {
printf Backed up %9.0f KiloBytes in the last FULL backup\n,tot }'
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
L. Sesar
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 8:02 AM
To: NetBackup Veritas
Subject: [Veritas-bu] determining size of last full backup of each
policy
I'm going through a sizing exercise right now and need to determine how
much data each full backup represents. Before re-inventing the wheel,
does anyone have any quick and dirty ways of accomplishing this?
Thanks,
Steve
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 84 errors after ADIC i2000 upgraded to i4 firmware
We run a IBM3584 tape library with 16 lto2 drives. Our IBM SE upgraded the firmware to the 5AT0 version and we started having SCSI errors on the Solaris machines as well as 84 errors in Netbackup. We downgraded and the 84 errors went away. Jimmy Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eagle, Kent Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 7:48 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Status 84 errors after ADIC i2000 upgraded to i4 firmware Greetings, Has anyone else experience Status 84 errors after upgrading the firmware on their ADIC i2000 to i4 (4.4.2 or 4.3.x)? We didn't have the problem on i3, and it went away when we downgraded the version. The other half of this equation is that along with the robot firmware, our IBM LTO2 drives firmware were upgraded from 4AP0 to 5AT0. We downgraded the drive firmware along with the robot firmware. Regards, Kent C. Eagle Systems Engineer, MCP, MCSE Tech Services / SMSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our website at www.wilmingtontrust.com Investment products are not insured by the FDIC or any other governmental agency, are not deposits of or other obligations of or guaranteed by Wilmington Trust or any other bank or entity, and are subject to risks, including a possible loss of the principal amount invested. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and/or proprietary information. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity who is the intended recipient. Unauthorized use of this information is prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender by replying to this message and delete this material from any system it may be on. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Is it possible to use bpgp to get bp.ini file from novell netware?
* Bob Stump [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-28 15:39]: environment NetBackup 5.1 MP4 on Solaris 9 master server / Novell Netware clients using targets method question is it possible to use bpgp to get the bp.ini file from a Novell Netware client onto a UNIX master server. And then edit it and place it back onto the Novell Netware client? I don't want to just try it because I am afraid of causing an abend. It is probably possible, but I would suggest looking at bpsetconfig first. What kind of data is in the bp.ini that you need to change? -- David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Typical success rates?
Title: Typical success rates?
Never have I had a day without failures. Here's a sample from my past
24 hours (v5.1MP5 backup server ... various clients numbering less than
150 ... reported errors only) ...
machine - status explanation
01 - 41 - This is one of several laptops that are backed up
whenever it is connected, but isn't connected very often. I wish
NetBackup could poll these machines quietly and back them up when they
appear. (about 2 dozen job failures of this type have been omitted from
this report)
02 - 1 - A mailbox could not be enumerated. The Exchange person
may correct these someday.
03 - 54 - bpbrm listen for client timeout during accept from data
listen socket for 60 seconds (will look into this one, especially if it
repeats)
04 - 58 - cannot connect (application does not play well with
NetBackup client - only a few backups are successful)
05 - 1 - cannot open file - in use by another process (will try
to exclude these files because the error appears permanent).
06 - 6 - failed to backup requested files. This was an CINC
Oracle backup on an idle DB. Maybe I can adjust script to force a
change in the DB or avoid backing up no changes
07 - 6 - same as machine 06.
08 - 54 - timeout connecting to client. NetBackup server was
delayed obtaining a tape drive, causing Oracle/RMAN to give up (I
think).
09 - 41 - network connection timed out. This was at very end of
backup ("end writing" in job details). Happens occasionally with this
client.
10 - 1 - Some ".tmp" files in use by another process. Will add
"*.tmp" to exclude list, but probably at expense of slowing backups?
Also, unable to export RSM database.
11 - 58 - cannot connect to client. Client machine is spread all
over a table, with HP trying to find what's wrong with it. Has been
down for several *weeks*. Have manually extended expiration of
existing backups. Too bad you can't tell NetBackup to keep its last
full backups of a client policy.
12 - 41 - similar to machines 06 and 09.
13 - 1 - Several "filemaker" files unavailable for backup. We
don't exclude because sometimes they can be backed up and that's better
than none.
14 - 41 - Another mysterious network connection timed out at or
near end of file system backup, when job began delayed with "busy
resources".
15 - 57 client connection refused. Similar to machine 04.
16 - 1 - A Windows file, access_log, has a portion locked by
another process. I cannot fix this without putting client in a policy
of its own, because the file is included for processing by a necessary
include list entry.
17 - 54 - Machine is powered off due to a power outage. User
doesn't care because he no longer works there and management hasn't
decided what to do yet.
18 - 1 - A few classical "in use" failures (Windows defender and
perfdata), as well as a "cannot open old TIR file" failure. Backing up
TIR files seems bogus, but I otherwise don't know how to avert the
problem.
19 - 58 - powered off due to same power outage as machine 17.
Machine is going away, but owner might resurrect it or want one more
backup.
20 - 58 - trying machine 11 backup again.
21 - 25 - cannot execute cmd on client. No idea why this
Exchange DB CINC backup failed (immediately). A later job worked.
22 - 1 - A relatively new Linux client trying to backup "sparse
file /sys/bus/pci/..." (many). Will suggest owner exclude.
23 - 1 - same as machine 22.
So that's about 50 jobs with errors out of about 375, or about 10-15%
of jobs. It gets better if you don't count status code 1s as failures,
worse if you consider a few clients have many file systems and
multi-stream enabled, and much better if you throw out all the failures
that are "expected"!
cheers, wayne
Whelan, Patrick wrote, in part, on 6/29/2006 1:48 PM:
Do you usually have a 100% success every backup
session? If not what is a typical success rate?
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Quantum DX100 Issue
Title: Quantum DX100 Issue We have 2 Dx100s and had problems several months ago when weinstalled Quantum's compression cards. We have since removed these and problems went away.Otherwise, these have been very stable for us. Quantum has recently updated the drivers on these compression cards, this may have corrected the problem we encountered. lee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pappas, PeterSent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 6:06 PMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Quantum DX100 Issue Hi, We have a Quantum DX100 Virtual Tape Library and are experiencing issues where the device regularly goes "Offline". I am wandering if anyone is experiencing the same problems. Regards,Peter ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies
Title: Message Simon One of our streams failed over the weekend and I just right clicked on thefailed streamin the activity monitor and selected Restart Job. Only that stream re-ran. May be a 6.0 thing though. Regards Richard From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, SimonSent: Friday, 30 June 2006 1:38 amTo: 'Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Martin B!! Thats not good is it :-((( but it what I have been doing ! Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2006 13:53To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: AW: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies No, as far as I know. You have to start the whole job and cancel the stream that you don't need Von: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 13:13An: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduBetreff: RE: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Martin Now that was my understanding! so really, I may as well kick off a failed job within the SAME policy. But can you kick off a STREAM rather than the whole lot? (job has 8 streams) Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Falk, Martin SZ/HZA-ITDS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2006 11:31To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: AW: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Netbackup uses a combination of Policy name and archive bit. If you restart broken jobs within another policy next time policy 1 will not recognize that the jobs was already done. Martin Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von WEAVER, SimonGesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 11:37An: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduBetreff: [Veritas-bu] Question on Policies Guys A quick question again about Policies Scenario: One Policy does Weekly Full backups and Cum Incr. - Policy Name is SERVER 1 I have created a 2nd Policy named SERVER1_MANUAL, same settings as SERVER1, but this time not specified any drives \ folders to backup. If a stream fails on the FULL Backup in the SERVER1 Policy, could I enable the 2nd policy to backup the stream that failed? Although this would work, I am starting to think that when the SERVER1 Policy runs an incremental, it will treat the streams that failed the full backup as a full backup and continue to do so until a Full Backup has run at the end of the week. Does that make sense? :-) Any guidance on this would be great, as I want to narrow down how many policies I have. Finally, if I get a failed stream, is there a way to KICK OFF just a single stream if the window has closed? What I do is kick off a MANUAL FULL, and kill the streams that I dont need a full backup of. Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in
Re: [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging in Netbackup Ver 6.0 MP2
Title: Message Sandeep Have you tried the Java GUI? It can be installed and upgraded independently of the Master server so may allow you to set up a DSSU properly asyou can run it with a different maintenance pack if needs be. The Java clientpatched withMP2is able to create a DSSU in the Windows environment. Regards Richard From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bhangui, Sandeep - BLS CTRSent: Friday, 30 June 2006 1:52 amTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging in Netbackup Ver 6.0 MP2 Karl So will I be correct in my conclusion that with Ver 6.0 and MP2 in a complete Sun Solaris environment I cannot create Disk staging Storage UNIT (DSSU) ??? But can just create Disk Storage UNIT (DSU)? If this indeed is true than this really sucks! Maybe I can backout of MP2 to get this feature. Thanks Sandeep -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:32 PMCc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging in Netbackup Ver 6.0 MP2[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/28/2006 02:06:16 PM: Hi Have Netbackup Server Base Edition Ver 6.0 + MP2 installed and configured on my UNIX machines. Have One master as well as Media configured to backup 25 clients. Wanted to create a DSU for temporary disk staging area to be dumped to tapes at a later time. Follow the procedure given in the docs to create the DSU but I just do not see the "Low Water Mark" stuff enabled for me to anything nor do I see any checkbox to state that this is a temp staging area. I thought that functionality of disk staging was available under Netbackup Server Base Edition. I'm guessing you mean DSSU. Anyway, i have noticed that you can no longer set the high and low water mark with MP2. Specifically using the Windows Gui connecting to a Unix master/media. I'm pretty sure you could set it in MP1 and GA. MP3 ;) should be out any day now. Karl-Frédéric Rossing, Technical Services phone: 204-786-6431 fax: 204-784-6755 toll free: 1-800-665-1934 www.federated.ca CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual(s) or organization(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email and its attachments from your system. Thank you. ** This electronic email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. The views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Christchurch City Council. If you are not the correct recipient of this email please advise the sender and delete. Christchurch City Council http://www.ccc.govt.nz ** ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Install Tests
Hello, I've just finished a fresh install of Netbackup 6.0FP2 on a solaris 8 system. Part of the requirements is to have NetBackup send an email to an admin list on failures only. So instead of using USEMAIL in bp.conf, which sends emails under any condition, I edited backup_exit_notify and added these lines: -- # $5 = Status if [[ $5 0 ]] ; then cat $OUTF | mail -s NetBackup backup exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] fi -- Is there a way to force a problem during a backup? I know I could just change the check to mail on condition 0 but I would just like to make sure the check is valid before dumping this server into production. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Install Tests
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 04:19:48PM -0700, Kevin Enslow wrote: Is there a way to force a problem during a backup? I know I could just change the check to mail on condition 0 but I would just like to make sure the check is valid before dumping this server into production. 1. Start a job and then kill it. You'll generate an error 150. 2. Start a job and then suspend it. You'll generate an error 157. You can also call the script directly and pass in the arguments that it lists. Nothing says that it has to be NetBackup that calls it. Cheers, .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
