Re: [videoblogging] Video Goes Underground
It's actually pretty easy using Broadcast Machine, a free tool from the Miro folks, which is based on Blog Torrent. I've installed both on regular old hosted Web services and they've worked great: http://www.getmiro.com/create/broadcast/ On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:38 AM, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: John from TotalVom, whose work has often discussed his role within a world of online content creators (as well as comment on them), has had enough of the youtube comments and decides to go BitTorrent only. I can see a whole slew of bittorrents by small artists that dont need the ubiquitous nature of posting content everywhere and just put out a torrent that you send to friends. http://totalvom.blip.tv/file/1127884/ I envision a bittorrent tracker only for original longish form video content; people friending each other in Vuse to share the workload (does anyone actually friend each other in their trackers? I dont, seems weird). Awesome and easy to set up, where creators create to dialog with each other without the need/care of Views and Comments. I own moneythong.com, sounds like a good name for an Underground Video Bittorrent tracker site. Does someone know how to make one of these? And yes, I'm inspired and serious. -- Schlomo Rabinowitz http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://hatfactory.net AIM:schlomochat [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: ASSplay Show Player
ASSPlay is free! And who knows, you just might like it! The level of sheer genius here is astounding. On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Drew Olanoff just told me that it was actually Adam Plante who made it. Bill http://BillCammack.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Drew Olanoff has released a nice show template that is open source and ready for use: http://www.getassplay.org/assplay.html And no, its not dirty. Go to the site it see what the name means:) Drew's website is here: http://www.drewolanoff.com/ -- Schlomo Rabinowitz http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://hatfactory.net AIM:schlomochat [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Anyone Got Your Head Around the Google Video AdSense Thing Yet?
I presume that's managed through the older YouTube-only program -- and that if you're a YouTube partner, the ads travel with the video via embeds, regardless if it's on your site or not. The new program seems to be for 3rd-party sites with their own Flash players, as well for video embedded via the AdSense units program. On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So if you post YouTube videos on your site will it work? Tim Street Creator/Executive Producer French Maid TV Subscribe for FREE @ http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes MyBlog http://1timstreet.com On Feb 21, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Jackson West wrote: That sounds about right to me. Though I'm still a tad confused as to how it works on 3rd party players from a purely technical standpoint. It definitely seems targetted towards aggregators, not smaller producers. I wonder how much of that $15 CPM will actually get to the content creator. JW On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]tim%40frenchmaidtv.com wrote: So I'm thinking that if you are in the US, have a site that serves over 1 million videos per month in English you can qualify for the beta of the Google AdSense for Video thing but I'm not sure. http://newteevee.com/2008/02/21/more-on-google-adsense-for-video/ Say you are you have a site like Revver or Blip.tv then you could put Google AdSense Overlays on your sites videos and like Google Text Advertising you would get paid when someone clicks or if you go for the CPM model you can get paid for views of the overlays. Does that sound right? Tim Street Creator/Executive Producer French Maid TV Subscribe for FREE @ http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes MyBlog http://1timstreet.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Anyone Got Your Head Around the Google Video AdSense Thing Yet?
The only advice I got at film school regarding online video was Brett Ratner suggesting that I could score a three-picture deal from a YouTube video -- I'll believe that when I see it. Creating content meant for primarily online distribution? There's no classes on that (yet). On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See,I should have gone back to Film School just so I could figure this out. Look at you? Mr. NYU Film School 08! Tim Street Creator/Executive Producer French Maid TV Subscribe for FREE @ http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes MyBlog http://1timstreet.com On Feb 21, 2008, at 12:06 PM, Jackson West wrote: I presume that's managed through the older YouTube-only program -- and that if you're a YouTube partner, the ads travel with the video via embeds, regardless if it's on your site or not. The new program seems to be for 3rd-party sites with their own Flash players, as well for video embedded via the AdSense units program. On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]tim%40frenchmaidtv.com wrote: So if you post YouTube videos on your site will it work? Tim Street Creator/Executive Producer French Maid TV Subscribe for FREE @ http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes MyBlog http://1timstreet.com On Feb 21, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Jackson West wrote: That sounds about right to me. Though I'm still a tad confused as to how it works on 3rd party players from a purely technical standpoint. It definitely seems targetted towards aggregators, not smaller producers. I wonder how much of that $15 CPM will actually get to the content creator. JW On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] tim%40frenchmaidtv.comtim%40frenchmaidtv.com wrote: So I'm thinking that if you are in the US, have a site that serves over 1 million videos per month in English you can qualify for the beta of the Google AdSense for Video thing but I'm not sure. http://newteevee.com/2008/02/21/more-on-google-adsense-for- video/ Say you are you have a site like Revver or Blip.tv then you could put Google AdSense Overlays on your sites videos and like Google Text Advertising you would get paid when someone clicks or if you go for the CPM model you can get paid for views of the overlays. Does that sound right? Tim Street Creator/Executive Producer French Maid TV Subscribe for FREE @ http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes MyBlog http://1timstreet.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Anyone Got Your Head Around the Google Video AdSense Thing Yet?
That sounds about right to me. Though I'm still a tad confused as to how it works on 3rd party players from a purely technical standpoint. It definitely seems targetted towards aggregators, not smaller producers. I wonder how much of that $15 CPM will actually get to the content creator. JW On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I'm thinking that if you are in the US, have a site that serves over 1 million videos per month in English you can qualify for the beta of the Google AdSense for Video thing but I'm not sure. http://newteevee.com/2008/02/21/more-on-google-adsense-for-video/ Say you are you have a site like Revver or Blip.tv then you could put Google AdSense Overlays on your sites videos and like Google Text Advertising you would get paid when someone clicks or if you go for the CPM model you can get paid for views of the overlays. Does that sound right? Tim Street Creator/Executive Producer French Maid TV Subscribe for FREE @ http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes MyBlog http://1timstreet.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Ninja Girl Debut!
Kent and Doug better watch out -- this looks pretty deadly. Tajee's fierce ninja balance skills and adorable kids? Video gold. On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fun video, Tajee! :D Bill http://BillCammack.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Yukako Tajima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ninja Girl, our new show has just been released today! http://ninjagirl.from.tv/ We just did videoblogging event in Tokyo, Japan. It was very exciting! (here is one of the articles) http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nc20080206a1.html We felt like starting something that we can connect to the world, and that is why we have started this show! Hope you will like it. Thank you! Tajee P.S. We also have videoblogging community in Japan! Join us if you are interested! [EMAIL PROTECTED] videoblogjapan%40googlegroups.com __ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: HV20 Camera Noise
Just from an audio-geek perspective, if you can figure out the pitch of the hum it should be fairly easy to attenuate it using a notch-filter or parametric EQ in FCP. I used to do this all the time with sixty-cycle hum from old analog equipment. JW On Jan 31, 2008 2:16 PM, Irene Duma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My hv20 doesn¹t make that much noise either. I have the Rode video mic too but find that it does pick up some camera noise still. I read online about getting an L bracket that will lift it up a bit higher from the body of the camera...anyone know of such a bracket? I once shot indoors with a dying flourescent bulb that made a horrendous noise something like that when the mic picked it up. I was able to get rid of most of it with this FCP plug-in - Mr. Hum by Wave arts. http://www.wavearts.com/MasterRestoration.html Sadly my 30 day free trial expired so am waiting for my next paid gig to buy the software because it was pretty cool. I went with the Rode mic vs the Canon when a post in a forum revealed that with the Rode, you can use it on other cameras that you may have as well, whereas the Canon will only work with the hotshoe mount. And since mics last longer than cameras, you¹ll be able to use the Rode on other subsequent cameras you buy. Thought that was a good selling point. Irene Irene Duma Strange Duck Media ...a good egg [EMAIL PROTECTED] irene%40strangeduck.com T 416-769-1879 C 416-535-0652 web design and creative marketing blogging easy computer tips http://www.strangeduck.com/blog and comedy at http://www.bittertonic.com On 1/31/08 5:00 PM, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]schlomo%40gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I've only played with the camera once, and that noise doesnt sound right. I'd use that warranty and send it in just in case. Couldn't hurt! On Jan 31, 2008 1:46 PM, Robert Croma [EMAIL PROTECTED]robert.croma%40gmail.com mailto:robert.croma%40gmail.com wrote: Josh, that's a hell of a whine. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Domain question
I'm in a class on documentary research and writing, and I was trying to whittle down my final choice for a focus from a couple of ideas, and as anyone on the Internet knows, you can't start a project until you've purchased an appropriate domain name. A quick search told me my first choice .com was taken, but .org and .tv weren't. I went with .org because it implies non-profit, while .tv implies ongoing 'channel' or 'collection' of video. Since a feature doc is my goal, .org made more sense even though it sort of forces the profit versus non-profit question. If I was doing a video blog or some such, I would have gone with .tv. But yeah, like Schlomo, I seem to collect domains for good ideas that I don't follow through on. But if Carson Daly can squat domains, so can we! On 10/17/07, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I own schlomo.tv for only one reason: schlomo.com is taken. Of course, I don't do anything with schlomo.tv because I'm happy with my blogspot account, so it just sits around being a waste of money on a yearly basis. Since I can't own schlomo.com, godaddy was nice enough to inform me that I can purchase theschlomo.com... which I did after having a couple shots of whiskey. That one, just like schlomo.tv, languishes on the vine, smelling worse each day I don't use it. So, I guess what I'm trying to say is: if you can't get the .com you want, get the .tv It won't change your life, but it will slightly change your pocketbook. On 10/17/07, John Oeffinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]joeffinger%40oeffingers.com wrote: I've mainly lurk on this group but have benefited from your comments and suggestions which I appreciate. Quick question, are most of you still using .com domains or are you migrating to .tv domains. If you are not migrating to the .tv domains, is it because of the domain name cost? Thanks for your insight...John -- Schlomo Rabinowitz http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://hatfactory.net AIM:schlomochat [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] What is a journalist--Defined
So legally, you aren't a journalist unless you're a commercial journalist, huh? Funny, other 'professions' like medicine and the law aren't tied to such mercenary considerations. On 10/17/07, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting ... reads as though you have to be getting paid to do it though. On 10/17/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay.dedman%40gmail.com wrote: The US House of Representatives recently passed a Federal Shield law for journalist. It's doesnt seem to please anyone fully, but it is a start. The interesting part is how they defined Journalist: In its current form, the law protects only a person who, for financial gain or livelihood, is engaged in journalism, which involves the gathering, preparing, collecting, photographing, recording, writing, editing, reporting, or publishing of news or information that concerns local, national, or international events or other matters of public interest for dissemination to the public. So this could include bloggers if what you do is regularly cover topics as your livelihood. Jay -- http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790 Video: http://ryanishungry.com Twitter: http://tinyurl.com/2aodyc RSS: http://tinyurl.com/yqgdt9 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links -- http://www.DavidMeade.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] What is a journalist--Defined
I guess my reaction is born from two things: one, there's no such requirement in California's shield law, and two, in the Apple v. Does case, the judge opted to protect the bloggers under that shield law (instead of trade secrets laws) since they'd committed an act of journalism, regardless of their background as journalists or reasons for doing so. I just don't see how a free and independent press doesn't include people who get a bug up their rear and publishing something, with no regard for their livelihood or personal financial gain. What about journalism students, who often take chances on writing provocative stuff -because- they have no need to earn a paycheck? To me, this was designed to apply only to the corporate press who have a vested interest in being the only organizations allowed to call employees and freelancers journalists. As David points out, it only matters how this applies in the courts. A law doesn't mean much without legal precedent to give it nuance. JW On 10/17/07, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wednesday, October 17, 2007, 7:02:50 PM, Jay dedman wrote: I do agree that it's trubling to read for financial gain or livelihood. does this mean you must get paid by a commercial company? can you just get donations from the community? can you have a day job and blog at night? In some ways this is the flip side of all the discussions we have had here about non commercial vs commercial use of creative commons liceneced resouces. Note that the finacial gain clause specifically does not say as a livelihood or for financial gain AND livelihood. The conjunction is or, which implies that mere financial gain on its own is enough. If showing content on an ad-laden web page counts as commercial use of material for licensing purposes, it's certainly reasonable to think that any site which earns from ads, sponsorship, or whatever would count as financial gain. Maybe those odd nickels and dimes from Google adsense count for something, after all ... -- Frank Carver http://www.makevideo.org.uk [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] What is a journalist--Defined
By the way, really looking forward to what Josh has to say in all this. On 10/17/07, Jackson West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess my reaction is born from two things: one, there's no such requirement in California's shield law, and two, in the Apple v. Does case, the judge opted to protect the bloggers under that shield law (instead of trade secrets laws) since they'd committed an act of journalism, regardless of their background as journalists or reasons for doing so. I just don't see how a free and independent press doesn't include people who get a bug up their rear and publishing something, with no regard for their livelihood or personal financial gain. What about journalism students, who often take chances on writing provocative stuff -because- they have no need to earn a paycheck? To me, this was designed to apply only to the corporate press who have a vested interest in being the only organizations allowed to call employees and freelancers journalists. As David points out, it only matters how this applies in the courts. A law doesn't mean much without legal precedent to give it nuance. JW On 10/17/07, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wednesday, October 17, 2007, 7:02:50 PM, Jay dedman wrote: I do agree that it's trubling to read for financial gain or livelihood. does this mean you must get paid by a commercial company? can you just get donations from the community? can you have a day job and blog at night? In some ways this is the flip side of all the discussions we have had here about non commercial vs commercial use of creative commons liceneced resouces. Note that the finacial gain clause specifically does not say as a livelihood or for financial gain AND livelihood. The conjunction is or, which implies that mere financial gain on its own is enough. If showing content on an ad-laden web page counts as commercial use of material for licensing purposes, it's certainly reasonable to think that any site which earns from ads, sponsorship, or whatever would count as financial gain. Maybe those odd nickels and dimes from Google adsense count for something, after all ... -- Frank Carver http://www.makevideo.org.uk [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] NTV Live Free to Those Carrying Cameras
While the suits are paying a pretty penny to catch the action at NewTeeVee Live on November 14th, don't think we've forgotten about the grassroots mediamakers out there -- passes have been set aside at free or nearly so for folks who'd like to blog or vlog the event. Just email Liz explaining your interest in attending (liz at gigaom dot com). http://newteevee.com/2007/10/12/announcing-the-newteevee-live-schedule/ Sadly, I can't make it as that's the week I'll be shooting a short film in New York. And stay tuned for more details as the date approaches... Best, Jackson West
Re: [videoblogging] Re: NTV Live Free to Those Carrying Cameras
There will be more content creators -- as the post reads, some slots are booked but the names aren't final final. It's only a one-day conference, so there's a real limit to how much we could do and other conferences like Pixelodeon, Podcamp and SXSWi already do such a great job of highlighting creators. I haven't seen CastTV and Taboola yet either, but as conference veterans know, a mix of well known personalities and compelling new products and people is optimal. Maybe one or more startups will launch publicly at the conference! JW On 10/15/07, Frank Sinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jackson, Thanks for the invite, a couple of questions: 1) Other than Kent from Ask a Ninja and Ben from Barely Political, why isn't NTV including people actually creating video in the sessions? There should be a session of just creators bringing their perspective. 2) How did you guys come up with your list for Search and Discovery Face Off? CastTV and Taboola haven't even launched yet. Regards, -Frank http://www.mefeedia.com/user/franks/ - What are you watching? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Jackson West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While the suits are paying a pretty penny to catch the action at NewTeeVee Live on November 14th, don't think we've forgotten about the grassroots mediamakers out there -- passes have been set aside at free or nearly so for folks who'd like to blog or vlog the event. Just email Liz explaining your interest in attending (liz at gigaom dot com). http://newteevee.com/2007/10/12/announcing-the-newteevee-live-schedule/ Sadly, I can't make it as that's the week I'll be shooting a short film in New York. And stay tuned for more details as the date approaches... Best, Jackson West [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Shooter in or near Cincinnati for Doc Project?
My friend and roommate Julia asked that I post to the list to see if anybody would be willing to help her shoot a couple of interview in Cincinnati this weekend for a documentary project she's working on. Great if you can provide a camera, but unfortunately not a paying gig, though she's willing to figure out a trade of some sort. Anyone interested please contact her directly: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Back to your regularly scheduled programming...
[videoblogging] Don't Miss Stephen McCandless
Just wanted to say that Caution Zero's new show What the Funny is just that, funny, and that Stephen McCandless is a smart guy with some great perspective. http://tinyurl.com/yrpfwa Makes all the sense in the world that fringe theater troupers would bring great performances online. For all you techies and filmmakers, go forth and find yourself underemployed actors in non-traditional media markets. Jackson P.S. To the Zaproot team, no ass-handing was expressed or implied. Just been thinking a lot about green media lately, and you happened to show up on the event horizon of my vortex of cynicism. For the record, it's a fun show.
Re: [videoblogging] A note about Podtech
I say it's fair use -- since Jay's schoolin' folks, it's educational! On 6/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed a clip of Alfonso in there? Isn't he SAG? Did they pay Alfonso and the director and cameraman who shot him? Just kidding ;) Tim On Jun 19, 2007, at 11:37 AM, schlomo rabinowitz wrote: Hey all Though this list can have a Gang Mob mentality against companies at times, Podtech does give some money to some very talented people.. and really, at the end of the day, that's all I really care about. (well, that, and getting Lan is money!!!) This guy has been on the internets for a long time; doing great work for the Hip Hop community. Well, Podtech has given him a little funding. Check this vid out and tell me you dont love it: http://www.illdoctrine.com/2007/06/ the_ill_doctrine_dipset_anthem.html Anyway, just talking perspective. Schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://weknowhow.tv http://winkshow.com http://hatfactory.net [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: amateur review of the flip video camera
Hey, thanks for this, Gena. I've been thinking about getting one of these because they're so cheap, it wouldn't be a disaster if it fell in a river or got smashed up in a bike accident. I really like the idea of creating custom software -- for instance, to arm an army of camerapeople at an event and upload to a custom site (a la the Beastie's I Shot That, but live and online). Also, the disposables they make have been popular as a hacker platform, I'm curious to see if anybody does the same for this. JW On 6/16/07, Daniel Geduld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure why, but the page isn't loading for me. On 6/16/07, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED]compumavengal%40earthlink.net wrote: Thanks for the comparison videos. I've been curious about these camcorders for a while. I almost bought one just for the heck of it but the price wasn't right. The .avi video quality looked ok for outdoor shots and Zooey was in motion enough so that I could see if there was any artifacts around her. I did notice a bit in the background grass from time to time. I'm glad that I can bypass proprietary software and edit as normal. What kind of batteries does the gizmo take and how long do/did they last? Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com http://pcclibtech.blospot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Lisa Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I posted an amateur review of the Flip Video camera from Pure Digital here. This camera just hit the streets. Really neat potential, I think: http://www.lisaharper.org/archives/2007/06/flip-video-mini-review/ Lisa [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Daniel J. Geduld Audio: http://www.everyonesvoice.com Video: http://www.flyingsquidstudios.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] A little off topic - Need tech advice
Don't forget Castfire, Schlomo! Also, I've heard of some open source efforts in this space. Couldn't hurt to look up open source youtube or the like, and I bet there's some Drupal-based solution. Plus, if you find an open source project you like and hire one of the coders to provide custom services and support, you'll be contributing to the development of the codebase. JW On 5/21/07, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why dont you contact someone like blip.tv re: white labelling? I think that if they can create a way for CNN to handle their content, they should be able to help you effectively. Also, there are other companies that do white labelling as well, such as Revver. Sounds like what you need is not a free service, but a robust customizable one. Contact these companies and I imagine they have something you can use. Schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://weknowhow.tv http://winkshow.com http://hatfactory.net On 5/21/07, Mark Westin [EMAIL PROTECTED] throbbingcow%40yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks - I'm wondering if anyone here can offer me suggestions on applications or interfaces on a slightly larger scale than the average videoblog. The company I work for has a huge amount of video content on the web, and we're trying to upgrade and increase the usability and efficiency of our website. I know this is sorta off topic for this group, but in a nutshell what I'm talking about is a high-end corporate videoblog - but it just can't look like a Wordpress or blip page. (No disrespect to them - I personally use and love both.) Currently we're hosted by an outside company whose interface lives within our site, but it's clunky - kinda ugly, confusing navigation, player doesn't look cool, encode and upload specs are narrow and video quality is unsatisfying. Our content includes graphics that require fullscreen viewing so we're aiming for the highest resolution possible at the smallest file size. We're shooting DV in a professionally lit studio, cutting on Avid and Sorenson squeezing. Here's what we need: 1. A host that can handle a large archive and hopefully can help us migrate smoothly. 2. Ease of posting (so non-tech employees can do it) 3. Embeddable player 4. Customizable and searchable interface (not just a player on a page) that can integrate seamlessly into our website with no external branding Obviously, we can spend some money on this endeavor. We're in a corporate environment so whoever we work with has to be an above-board solution provider with a track record and some substance - my bosses are tech savvy but leery of anything that's in beta or seems to be flash in the pan. If you're still reading and have any thoughts on this, email me at throbbingcow AT yahoo dot com. Many thanks, MW [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] A little off topic - Need tech advice
And just so I don't get accused of bias, I'll throw Brightcove into the mix. On 5/21/07, Jackson West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't forget Castfire, Schlomo! Also, I've heard of some open source efforts in this space. Couldn't hurt to look up open source youtube or the like, and I bet there's some Drupal-based solution. Plus, if you find an open source project you like and hire one of the coders to provide custom services and support, you'll be contributing to the development of the codebase. JW On 5/21/07, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why dont you contact someone like blip.tv re: white labelling? I think that if they can create a way for CNN to handle their content, they should be able to help you effectively. Also, there are other companies that do white labelling as well, such as Revver. Sounds like what you need is not a free service, but a robust customizable one. Contact these companies and I imagine they have something you can use. Schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://weknowhow.tv http://winkshow.com http://hatfactory.net On 5/21/07, Mark Westin [EMAIL PROTECTED]throbbingcow%40yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks - I'm wondering if anyone here can offer me suggestions on applications or interfaces on a slightly larger scale than the average videoblog. The company I work for has a huge amount of video content on the web, and we're trying to upgrade and increase the usability and efficiency of our website. I know this is sorta off topic for this group, but in a nutshell what I'm talking about is a high-end corporate videoblog - but it just can't look like a Wordpress or blip page. (No disrespect to them - I personally use and love both.) Currently we're hosted by an outside company whose interface lives within our site, but it's clunky - kinda ugly, confusing navigation, player doesn't look cool, encode and upload specs are narrow and video quality is unsatisfying. Our content includes graphics that require fullscreen viewing so we're aiming for the highest resolution possible at the smallest file size. We're shooting DV in a professionally lit studio, cutting on Avid and Sorenson squeezing. Here's what we need: 1. A host that can handle a large archive and hopefully can help us migrate smoothly. 2. Ease of posting (so non-tech employees can do it) 3. Embeddable player 4. Customizable and searchable interface (not just a player on a page) that can integrate seamlessly into our website with no external branding Obviously, we can spend some money on this endeavor. We're in a corporate environment so whoever we work with has to be an above-board solution provider with a track record and some substance - my bosses are tech savvy but leery of anything that's in beta or seems to be flash in the pan. If you're still reading and have any thoughts on this, email me at throbbingcow AT yahoo dot com. Many thanks, MW [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Editing Software for Windoze
Hey all. Just shot some hella fun footage of Bay to Breakers (runners! nudity! costumes! dancing! alcoholism!) and I'm dreading the thought of having to edit it all with Quicktime Pro or, even worse, Windows Movie Maker. Anybody have suggestions for a simple, lightweight video editing application (or, even better, online thingie)? I've only got a 1GHZ laptop, so I'm not sure I could run the latest Premiere or Vegas.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Editing Software for Windoze
I'm saving up for one of those new MacBooks, and yes, then I will beg, borrow or steal a copy of Final Cut and be much, much happier. Gena, those suggestions are super-helpful. I downloaded a trial install of Premiere Elements, since there was a time ten years ago when Premiere was all there was, really -- you know, back when it was still called Digital Non-linear Editing as opposed to just Editing. :) JW On 5/20/07, Roxanne Darling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sidebar comment: Jackson, would you like us to start a petition drive recommending your esteemed place of employment supply you with a nice cheap new mac that can enable you to be far more efficient, not to mention happy, which further improves efficiency and creativity?? If so, I'm in. :-) Rox On 5/20/07, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED]compumavengal%40earthlink.net wrote: You could swing toward Ulead http://www.ulead.com that is a good all around package. http://www.ulead.com/vs/compare.htm I truly like Serif MoviePlus 5 http://www.serif.com/movieplus/movieplus5/index.asp Simple interface and you can go as simple or a complex as you want for your basic needs. If you need to do non-destructive splits, L-Cuts or overlays this is your baby. Both programs have trial versions you can download and use before you buy. Can't speak for the new version of Ulead but MP5 is lean so I think you can use it comfortably on your laptop. Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com http://pcclibtech.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Jackson West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all. Just shot some hella fun footage of Bay to Breakers (runners! nudity! costumes! dancing! alcoholism!) and I'm dreading the thought of having to edit it all with Quicktime Pro or, even worse, Windows Movie Maker. Anybody have suggestions for a simple, lightweight video editing application (or, even better, online thingie)? I've only got a 1GHZ laptop, so I'm not sure I could run the latest Premiere or Vegas. -- Roxanne Darling o ke kai means of the sea in hawaiian 808-384-5554 http://www.twitter.com/roxannedarling http://www.beachwalks.tv http://www.barefeetshop.com http://www.barefeetstudios.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Editing Software for Windoze
Okay, Premiere Elements trial sucks. I spent two hours editing a short piece, only to find out that when you export, it puts an Adobe bug in the output file. Bo! Trying Ulead Video Studio. JW On 5/20/07, Jackson West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm saving up for one of those new MacBooks, and yes, then I will beg, borrow or steal a copy of Final Cut and be much, much happier. Gena, those suggestions are super-helpful. I downloaded a trial install of Premiere Elements, since there was a time ten years ago when Premiere was all there was, really -- you know, back when it was still called Digital Non-linear Editing as opposed to just Editing. :) JW On 5/20/07, Roxanne Darling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sidebar comment: Jackson, would you like us to start a petition drive recommending your esteemed place of employment supply you with a nice cheap new mac that can enable you to be far more efficient, not to mention happy, which further improves efficiency and creativity?? If so, I'm in. :-) Rox On 5/20/07, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED]compumavengal%40earthlink.net wrote: You could swing toward Ulead http://www.ulead.com that is a good all around package. http://www.ulead.com/vs/compare.htm I truly like Serif MoviePlus 5 http://www.serif.com/movieplus/movieplus5/index.asp Simple interface and you can go as simple or a complex as you want for your basic needs. If you need to do non-destructive splits, L-Cuts or overlays this is your baby. Both programs have trial versions you can download and use before you buy. Can't speak for the new version of Ulead but MP5 is lean so I think you can use it comfortably on your laptop. Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com http://pcclibtech.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Jackson West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all. Just shot some hella fun footage of Bay to Breakers (runners! nudity! costumes! dancing! alcoholism!) and I'm dreading the thought of having to edit it all with Quicktime Pro or, even worse, Windows Movie Maker. Anybody have suggestions for a simple, lightweight video editing application (or, even better, online thingie)? I've only got a 1GHZ laptop, so I'm not sure I could run the latest Premiere or Vegas. -- Roxanne Darling o ke kai means of the sea in hawaiian 808-384-5554 http://www.twitter.com/roxannedarling http://www.beachwalks.tv http://www.barefeetshop.com http://www.barefeetstudios.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Pixelodeon attendees
On my trip to LA in January I stayed at the Mayfair -- tres shabby, but cheap, there's free wifi, a good taco truck across the street and it's only a five minute walk to the Metro train. Yes, I just said LA, walk and train all in one sentence. But then I'm the kind of guy who'll take el sabor del barrio over parking and pool six days a week and twice on Sunday. On 4/30/07, ryanne hodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: remember to add yourself to upcoming so we know you're coming (and so other people will want to come because you are coming) http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/158264/ On 4/30/07, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] taoofdavid%40gmail.com wrote: Checked out Expedia and found these hotels that are close to the AFI. Hollywood Downtowner Days Inn Hollywood Ca Super 8 Motel - Hollywood/L.A. Area Days Inn - Los Angeles Hollywood Inn Express North I have no idea if they are any good at all. David http://www.davidhowellstudios.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am about to book my flight and hotel for Pixelodeon. For those that are going, where are you staying? good question. im putting together a list of places to stay close to the American Film Institute. if you have identified any specific places, ill add them to the list. Jay -- Here I am http://jaydedman.com Check out the latest project: http://pixelodeonfest.com/ Webvideo festival this June -- Pixelodeon-June 9th 10th American Film Institute (AFI) LA, CA From the Computer Screen to the Big Screen http://pixelodeonfest.com/ -- Author of Secrets of Videoblogging http://tinyurl.com/me4vs Me http://RyanEdit.com, http://RyanIsHungry.com Educate http://FreeVlog.org, http://Node101.org Community Capitalism http://HaveMoneyWillVlog.com iChat/AIM VideoRodeo [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player
Rad. I agree with Sull -- been waitin' for multiple playlists. :) JW On 4/19/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Two weeks. :) Yours, Mike -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mattfeldman78 Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 3:36 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player Hi, Has anyone found a way to control the order of the episodes within the player? Is this something that Blip is planning on offering? -Matt http://neovids.tv --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good for things like user profiles on various social networks. - Verdi On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins steve@ wrote: Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff being pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like experience to be completely available from within a flash player. Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player are hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of your blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting page rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem because the expectation may be that you embed their player in your site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you want. But this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be embedded on another site or used as a widget. I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the player so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner, which is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice. Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip shows, basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they point to the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages. This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only thing that seems to update with the individual video is if you click guide and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the individual video's page on blip. -- Bill C. BillCammack.com Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested in the past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether it be through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab. I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being 320x240. I see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it look quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to be displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide players with separate episode bars to one side of the video. Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for wordpress that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash player. I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology for now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun. Cheers Steve Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack mike@ wrote: Michael, For some people the blog format is really important. Cross-posting, copy paste and everything else we've built to support the blog format aren't going away. We're going to keep those features, and we're going to keep improving them. It's just that the blog format isn't right for everyone. -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Verdi Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] New blip.tv show player Aaron Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think options for people are important and I do like the ability to look through an archive but the price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog - permalinks, comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That player is
Re: [videoblogging] Labourvision - New Labour get a videoblog
Thanks for the tip, Beth. Hope you don't mind too terribly much, but I quoted your analysis of Blair's set design. http://newteevee.com/2007/04/12/party-vloggers-in-the-uk/ Also, had a little fun with it. :) JW On 4/12/07, beth_tilston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here in the UK, we already have WebCameron (http://www.webcameron.org.uk), the Conservative leader David Cameron's attempt to woo voters with videos on Conservative policy narrated from his kitchen (Ecover bottles in full view). Now New Labour have joined the trend. They just launched Labourvision, to enable you to hear unmediated, fresh, first-hand, what it is we are about (See yesterday's Guardian article - http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,2054070,00.html). Unmediated! They must have worked hard to pull that one off! Go here http://www.youtube.com/labourvision for labourvision in its full low-production-value/background-noise-included glory. I wonder how much though went into choosing the officey looking corner (people can empathise with offices) that it was filmed in. Cynical. Moi. beth xxx [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf to be releases
Come have a coke and cheer. http://upcoming.org/event/171817/?ps=6 On 4/3/07, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Regardless of whether he gets MSM attention or not, I am glad he is going to be released. Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is good news, indeed!!! Now, hopefully, Josh Wolf gets more MSM attention than justin.tv is getting... Schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http:/winkshow.com http://hatfactory.net http://evilvlog.com On 4/3/07, Steve Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been annouced that Josh will be released. He has put the video he didn't include in his original piece on blip. the video a brief statement are at http://joshwolf.net/blog/ -- Steve Rhodes http://ari.typepad.com http://tigerbeat.vox.com blogs http://flickr.com/photos/ari/ photos http://del.icio.us/tigerbeat interesting articles sites http://twitter.com/tigerbeat [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Introducing myself
Will Pate rocks cats. And that's a verifiable fact. On 3/29/07, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: will = yay! On 3/29/07, Patrick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED]patsvideoblog%40gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone: On 28 Mar 2007 10:28:27 -0700, Will Pate [EMAIL PROTECTED]will%40willpate.org will%40willpate.org wrote: Hey vloggy peeps, I joined the group recently but haven't introduced myself yet. Well glad you did. WELCOME. :D Cheers :D -- Pat Cook Denver, Colorado WEBSITES - AS MY WACKED OUT WORLD TURNS - http://pchamster.livejournal.com/ PAT'S REAL DEAL VIDEO BLOG - http://patsrealdeal.livejournal.com/ Pat's Health Medical Wonders VideoCast - http://patshealthmedicalwondersvideocast.blogspot.com/ MY LIVE CAM - http://patscam.camstreams.com/ YouTube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/amwowttv/ THE PAT COOK SHOW - http://www.livevideo.com/thepatcookshow -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] NewTeeVee Request for reactions to State of Vlogosphere
Mefeedia, in the tradition of Technorati's State of the blogosphere reports, has posted some numbers and analysis. I would love to get some reactions from the crowd here. http://mefeedia.com/blog/2007/03/136/ Please let me know with an OTR tag if you'd prefer not to be directly quoted. If you prefer to contact me directly, it's jacksonwest at gmail The web moves fast -- my piece is due by 11am PST, so please drop me line or reply sooner rather than later. Thanks kids, keep up the great work! Jackson West NewTeeVee.com
Re: [videoblogging] Re: NewTeeVee Request for reactions to State of Vlogosphere
I spoke to Frank Sinton, and more details will be released in my article. But for everyone's information, the numbers reflect where feeds listed with Mefeedia originate, not where the actual content is hosted (which was the main question everyone seemed to have about the study). On 30 Mar 2007 10:39:12 -0700, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its interesting but id like to see more detail of the methodology. For example does 'number of videoblogs' mean number of feeds, does it take account of rss feeds that are built on the fly based on search terms, etc. And is the breakdown of sites used purely based on where the video files themselves are hosted, or is it anything to do with where the rss feed is generated? Is it purely based on feeds taht have been added to mefeddia, and so trends that show an increase in vlogs might just mean an increase of vlogs being picked up by mefeedia? If we wanted accurate numbers on youtube use, how would you go about finding them all as opposed to youtube users who usually upload copyrighted stuff from tv etc? And finally, are the vlogs on mefeddia mostly English-language, and thus these stats are likely to miss the non-English vlogs in the world? Its still useful to see their numbers, just cant think of a way to measure such things with a high degree of accuracy. I assume mefeedia do what they can with the data that is accessible to them, thats all they can be expected to do so Im not criticising them for bothering. Some details on how much the vlogs are being watched through mefeedia might be a useful measure of the state of the vlogosphere too? Cheers Steve Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Jackson West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mefeedia, in the tradition of Technorati's State of the blogosphere reports, has posted some numbers and analysis. I would love to get some reactions from the crowd here. http://mefeedia.com/blog/2007/03/136/ Please let me know with an OTR tag if you'd prefer not to be directly quoted. If you prefer to contact me directly, it's jacksonwest at gmail The web moves fast -- my piece is due by 11am PST, so please drop me line or reply sooner rather than later. Thanks kids, keep up the great work! Jackson West NewTeeVee.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: It's Official, We Won
I was totally pumped when I heard the news! Don't flip out and kill too many people. On 26 Mar 2007 15:40:51 -0700, Chumley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Grants Kent and Doug, You guys deserve it! Rev. Chumley http://www.cultofuhf.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Kent Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Guys: Just wanted to thanks again to the community. Your support, guidance, and friendship has been invaluable to Douglas and myself. I only hope we can give back more than we've received. -K, Cross posted from: http://www.askaninja.com/node/3220 Well, Thank you. Thanks to our fans from AskANinja.com, Myspace.com, Digg.com, iTunes, YouTube.com and everywhere else.com. Because of your efforts we won a href=http://youtube.com/ytawards;Best Series of 2006 on YouTube/a. A YouTubey. The media has been calling a lot today, so keep your eyes peeled for the Ninja. :) Not to get too corny, but the key is YOU. You send in the questions. You keep us pumped about what we're doing. When we started Ask A Ninja, Douglas and I were at the lowest point of our careers. We had nothing but an inspiration to start a gmail account. And you sent in questions, we started laughing and then the whole world came in on the joke. So thank you. We owe you a lot and I hope we can continue to entertain you for years to come. -Kent, Douglas, and the Ninja [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] joost
Except for how commercial it is, it's actually pretty cool. We were handing out invites a few weeks ago, I'll see if we have any left. JW On 2/22/07, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'd like to try this after all . anyone have an invite i can borrow? :) -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] NewTeeVee loves puppies, apple pie...more at eleven!
Hello, I'm Jackson West. You may remember me from such blogs as SFist: The Gavin Newsom Follies and Fleshbot: Booze, Hookers and Blow. I'm just writing to thank folks for reading NewTeeVee, warn you that I'm watching, beg you to digg our posts every once in a while, eagerly invite you to troll our comments and otherwise formally introduce myself. I'm in a tough place, because there are so many stories I want to tell, but the investors would prefer that I tell the ones that will be wildly popular. Which is apparently anything having to do with Joost, Amanda Congdon (no offense, Amanda) and where to find Fox's fear-porn revue, 24, for free on teh innerwebs. So if you want me to keep pumping your niche web shows, linking to your sponsorship efforts, calling film commissioners and lawyers for fun and showing up at small events put on by startups and creators, please help me help you by leaving comments and telling your friends! My only alternative is to take Jessica Lee Rose and Lisa Donovan hostage, force them to make out and distribute the footage via Babelgum. Do you really want to see that happen?
[videoblogging] Re: NewTeeVee loves puppies, apple pie...more at eleven!
Thanks for the kind words, here and in the past! Now that I've done my part to promote the site, it's back to writing. Just wanted to make sure you guys knew I'm here for the love of the game, but the accountants who process my checks have other priorities. The good news is that for every My Name is Earl post, maybe somebody reads a Wreck Salvage write up. With that, I'll shut my Joost hole. At least until I have another project to announce (which, as some of you may know, may be sooner rather than later). In the meantime, feel free to bug me direct with questions, tips, rumors and your own self-promotional efforts -- jacksonwest at gmail --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes On 2/21/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So if you want me to keep pumping your niche web shows, linking to your sponsorship efforts, calling film commissioners and lawyers for fun and showing up at small events put on by startups and creators, please help me help you by leaving comments and telling your friends! My only alternative is to take Jessica Lee Rose and Lisa Donovan hostage, force them to make out and distribute the footage via Babelgum. Do you really want to see that happen? yeah...just as we have to support each other as independent creators...we got to also support the journalists who write about this new world. I wonder if Joost hole will be in the dictionary soon. jay -- Here I am http://jaydedman.com -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] SXSW
Both Liz and I will be there reporting for NewTeeVee. On 2/15/07, Micki Krimmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm there for sure! On 2/15/07, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] schlomo%40gmail.com wrote: It's looking like I may be there. If you remember the Red Bull House last year, some of my stuff will be there this year. Schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com On 2/14/07, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] irinaski%40gmail.comirinaski%40gmail.com wrote: hey all can you please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] irinaski%40gmail.com irinaski%40gmail.com and let me know if you'll be at SXSW -- thanks guys! -- www.mickipedia.com www.worldchanging.com http://blog.revver.com NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse or protection from this unwarranted intrusion save to call for the impeachment of the current President. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
