[videoblogging] Decoding the HTML 5 video codec debate
via Daring Fireball http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/07/decoding-the-html-5-video-codec-debate.ars
[videoblogging] The Question of Freedom at the Open Video Conference
FYI http://rhizome.org/editorial/2739 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] My Wordpress 2.01 blog on Dreamhost has been Hacked!
I'm not that familiar with WP so I don't know where the password is stored, this is just a tip off the top of my head... Find out where the password is stored. If it's stored in the database you'll need to login to the database (either via command line, SSH perhaps, or phpMyAdmin I think DH provides this tool) and use a SQL directive to change it (since it's probably stored in an encryped way). If it's stored in a flat file somewhere (i doubt it), then just FTP in and change it there. You probably need to check that the database configuration file for WP still has the proper values as well. I'm not certain the name of the file where this config is set, maybe wp-config.php ?? Good luck On 2/11/06, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just discovered my vblog has been hacked by Kid Fantasy and am unable to login as Admin. An FTP into the blog/ directory shows all the files are still there. There is some discussion on Google and the Forums about the problem, but nothing that I can get a handle on and fear trial and error fixes might make thing worse. I've e-mailed Dreamhost support, but the last time it was days before they got back me. Bottom line: I've looked into all the self-help options, but no luck. I am new to MySQL PHP so any help or pointers in getting my vblog, back online would be greatly appreciated. Thank you... -Patrick Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] QT compression: High quality at low bit rates
via Digg Haven't tried it but might be helpful for some folks. http://urlx.org/wikicities.com/a794 -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] new media art commissions: any artist vloggers out there?
Rhizome is pleased to announce that [...] between eight and eleven new Internet art projects will be commissioned in 2006. The fee for each commission will range from $900 – $3,000 (that's USD). (Rhizome.org is an organization that promotes new media art.) More here: http://rhizome.org/commissions/ It would be nice to see a vlogger score some of that cash. In the past there have been residency requirements for these grants (the Jerome foundation only funds artists living in NY and Minnesota for example) but I don't see anything about it on the site this year. Best, -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Rocketboom Changes?
Andrew thinks the show is worth $50 - $150, that doesn't make it so (or not so). There is a market for online video advertising and the price is much lower than $50. Andrew believes that RB-type of video is a whole new market that hasn't had a price set for it yet (please correct me if I'm wrong). That's the purpose of an auction, it creates the price. The price is what the market decides it wants to pay for it. Of course, Andrew doesn't have to accept whatever this price turns out to be. On 2/7/06, Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Absolutely. There is no incentive for Andrew and Amanda to accept less than the true market value of their space. They have the option of going through ad agencies to get that if they want. -- On Feb 7, 2006, at 6:33 AM, Ms. Kitka wrote: Well, $15,000 isn't a lot of money for a high profile show like Rocketboom. As Andrew has previously mentioned, RB has already been talking about CPMs from $50-150. If this is so, why would RB submit to such a low paycheck when they're already having offers of much more? If you take the minimum $50 CPM, that makes $50,000/week. Doesn't it make $15,000 look like charity? Kitka -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Changing your iTunes URL
find the info on this page:http://www.apple.com/itunes/podcasts/techspecs.htmlChanging Your Feed URL Podcasters occasionally need to move their feed from one location to another. In this case, you should not remove your feed. If possible, you should set your web server to return a 301 error and redirect when receiving a request for the old feed. Doing so will cause both the iTunes Music Store and the iTunes clients that have subscribed to your podcast to pick up the new feed URL. Be sure to maintain the redirect for at least two weeks to ensure that most subscribers have attempted to download your most recent episode and have thereby received the new URL. If you don't know how to return an HTTP 301, you can use the itunes:new-feed-url tag described in the iTunes RSS Tags section below. The tag will cause the iTunes music store to be updated with the new feed URL, but it will not inform iTunes clients of the new location. You may choose to include an audio note in your podcast, informing your subscribers that your podcast has changed locations. After adding the tag, be sure to keep your feed running at the old URL for at least 48 hours.On 2/7/06, Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whats a surefire way to switch your iTunes URL that will keep both your old users subscribed, and update the music store? If you put a redirect in your .htaccess file, will that work? I had an xml on my server that I was manually updating, but then I realized this was stupid and that I could do this automatically with blip. So, I want the people who've subscribed to the one on my server to get redirected to blip, and I want the music store people to get moved there, too. I didn't really get the return 302 thing that iTunes talked about in their help page - where they heck do I type that info in? Thanks Brett-- ---Brett Gaylorhttp://www.etherworks.ca http://www.homelessnation.org SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Daily Vodcasts???
you could try blocking requests from that domain... On 1/31/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if it's an automated feed. If you post a blog/vlog critical of Daily Vodcasts, would it appear there? -- Enric --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ms. Kitka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know how to contact the webmaster of DailyVodcasts.com? He has been taking the Kitkast RSS feed, along with the RSS feeds of other videoblogs, and re-posting everything on his web site without permission or credit to the vloggers who made them. I tried searching his site on WhoIS, but the owner's information is private. I would appreciate any information that you would be able to provide. Go check to see if your feed is being aggregated too. I know that he is also aggregating the feeds of Suicide Girls and This or That TV... but there are dozens of other posts per day. Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] for Movie Maker users...
A Microsoft developer who blogs much is trying to talk the Movie Maker developers into blogging. Perhaps some vloggers using Movie Maker would be interested in posting comments/encouragement? here: http://urlx.org/retrosight.com/052f -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] YouTube
I believe the TOU for YouTube are a suckers deal.Here's Flickr's relevent bit (actually part of the Yahoo! TOU) YouTube *is* the Flickr of video afterall:With respect to photos, graphics, audio or video you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible area of the Service other than Yahoo! Groups, the license to use, distribute, reproduce, modify, adapt, publicly perform and publicly display such Content on the Service solely for the purpose for which such Content was submitted or made available. This license exists only for as long as you elect to continue to include such Content on the Service and will terminate at the time you remove or Yahoo! removes such Content from the Service.+++I am not a lawyer but this is how I read it:YouTube claims a license to use your content anyway they deem fit forever and ever in any part of the world just by you submitting the content to the service. Whereas Yahoo (Flickr) will only license to use, distribute, reproduce, modify, adapt, publicly perform and publicly display such Content on the Service solely for the purpose for which such Content was submitted or made available. and this right is rescinded as soon as either of you decides to remove it form the service.YouTube could conceivably create a 'YouTube Greatest Hits DVD (prepare derivative works of.. in any media format) and sell it worldwide (any media channel) and the content creators would get bupkis (royalty-free). Of course you could make your own DVD and they wouldn't be able to stop you (non-exclusive). They are granting themselves every right you have to your work, with no way for you to revoke those right. They generously allow you to keep those rights, what a deal! On 1/24/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So my basic issues with the service as it is right now are:1. The Terms of Use. Specifically, For clarity, you shall retain all of your ownership rights in your User Submissions. However, by submitting the User Submissions to YouTube, you hereby grant YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, fully paid-up, royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, sublicenseable and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, perform and otherwise exploit the User Submissions in connection with the YouTube Website and YouTube's (and its successor's) business, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the YouTube Website (and derivative works thereof) in any media formats and through any media channels. The way I read that is you are giving them the right to do whatever they want with your work - even profit from it or licensce it to someone else - without necessarily including you in the deal. Am I misinterpreting this?-- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: What's up with Apple and RSS?
what's up with that itpc protocol? wtf is that? oh i see, it launches iTunes. What happens if you don't have iTunes? anybody want to check? When you create the page in iweb does it ask you what protocol you would like to use? Casual and new users publishing with iweb won't know what the dealio is anyway, if this itpc thing is the default, most users of iweb will simply publish their xml urls using that protocol. This is surely f'd up IMHO. On 1/20/06, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cheers for the confirmation. Yes I agree its almost certainly cos they didnt want to get into the whole database thing,b ut what this really means is that they arent getting into many of the things that make a blog a blog, and a blog publishing system a blog publishing system. It sounds like iWeb is really just a sort of 'personal website creator ' simplesoft like has been around for years, but theyve stolen some of the brand and style from blog developments in recent years. Not dissimilar to what theyve done with podcasting etc. .Mac, your own personal slice of the internet circa 1996 Just as bad as Microsoft, just with slightly better style propaganda, and quicker to hijack new phenomenon. Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: iWeb = no comments I'm guessing they didn't want to mess with databases? On 1/20/06, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apple are turning into selfish polluters of many modern web developments if you ask me! Youve got iWeb so tell me is it true, that theyve included 'blog' stuff but not as we know ie, ie no comment system!?! I can see why for technical reasons it would be harder to include a comment system, but really, argh, if Apple carry on at this pace they will have bastardised everything we take forgranted by the end of 2006! Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So we've talked many times about the weird stuff Apple added to RSS for use in the iTunes store. Then today I read this about it's new Photocasting thing: URL: http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2148908/rss-community-blasts-apple So I figured I'd give that iWeb thing a try and see what kind of RSS feed I got. Well here is my result: URL: http://michaelverdi.com/iwebtest It the site works but neither iTunes nor FireAnt recognize the feed as valid. Also they way they structure the link to the RSS feed will prevent most people from using it in anything other than iTunes - NOT COOL! -Verdi -- -- Me: http://michaelverdi.com RD: http://evilvlog.com Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org Yahoo! Groups Links -- -- Me: http://michaelverdi.com RD: http://evilvlog.com Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] blogger to wordpress
Hi, You would need to set that up on blogger somewhere. If you wanted to simply forward to your front page you could do it with JS in your blogger template (are you allowed to edit the template?). The best way to do it would be on the server-side. But I assume blogger doesn't offer that service. On 1/18/06, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey gang, I am starting to redesign my site and move from blogger to wordpress I know that i can import comments and posts and that i can have joshleo.blogspot.com forward to joshleo.com/vlog (new blog frontpage) when it is up and running. and I know that the old post permalinks will not forward to my new permalinks but i am still unsure if old permalinks forward to the standard site. example: joshleo.blogspot.com/01/2005/josh-is-cool.html to joshleo.com/vlog (The new wordpress blog front page) I know it wont forward to the post but hopefully the permalinks will forward somewhere? maybe the blog front page? -- Josh Leo joshleo.com stonefarm.blogspot.com joshspicks.blogspot.com vlogcats.blogspot.com wearethemedia.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] blogger to wordpress
FWIW I agree, you should keep the old account (esp if it's free) and add a big notice at the top to go to the new home page of the blog. You don't want to break all the links that are probably indexed in search engines, linked from other sites, etc, etc. By forwarding to the front of a new site, you force folks to search for the content they were looking for when they get there. Give 'em what they're looking for first, then let them decide if they want to continue to explore your site. best, On 1/18/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just so that what I mean is clearer ... That block of text can appear WITH the origional content (not simply in place of it). That way old permalinks that dont get updated can still find the content - and a handy reminder that they're at an out-dated url. (Although you could do something more advanced with JavaScript to redirect individual old permalinks to their new location on the new site, it would be a much bigger deal (you'd have to have a page at the new site that would do some work and basically map old permalinks to new ones). My personal thought is that it would be easiest to put up a banner we've moved sign, but still leave the old content available ... that way old links and cached feed entries will still be valid.) On 1/18/06, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what do other people think? is it better to redirect to the new site or is it better to have a block of text that reads this site has moved? On 1/18/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Blogger does allow it, you can add a meta refresh to the html header that will send any request for the old site to the new one ... however ... you may not want to do that, Josh. You may want to leave the old site there (its free right?) that way all your permalinks still point to the video posts people have linked to. You could alter the template to display some sort of This site has moved, please update your bookmarks / links or whatever. if you do want to redirect the old site just edit your template and add the following line to the head portion: meta http-equiv=Refresh content=0;url=NEW_URL_HERE - Dave On 1/18/06, T.Whid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, You would need to set that up on blogger somewhere. If you wanted to simply forward to your front page you could do it with JS in your blogger template (are you allowed to edit the template?). The best way to do it would be on the server-side. But I assume blogger doesn't offer that service. On 1/18/06, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey gang, I am starting to redesign my site and move from blogger to wordpress I know that i can import comments and posts and that i can have joshleo.blogspot.com forward to joshleo.com/vlog (new blog frontpage) when it is up and running. and I know that the old post permalinks will not forward to my new permalinks but i am still unsure if old permalinks forward to the standard site. example: joshleo.blogspot.com/01/2005/josh-is-cool.html to joshleo.com/vlog (The new wordpress blog front page) I know it wont forward to the post but hopefully the permalinks will forward somewhere? maybe the blog front page? -- Josh Leo joshleo.com stonefarm.blogspot.com joshspicks.blogspot.com vlogcats.blogspot.com wearethemedia.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links -- http://www.DavidMeade.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- Josh Leo joshleo.com stonefarm.blogspot.com joshspicks.blogspot.com vlogcats.blogspot.com wearethemedia.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- http://www.DavidMeade.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: wmv from quicktime, for free
there's a trial period. http://www.flip4mac.com/wmv_upgrades.htm On 1/13/06, duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you may need to call 'em josh.. just tried it, exported a 30sec clip from a DV-PAL quicktime out of QT Pro, no problems! played in WMP (only on a Mac so far but it seems ok? ).. all free! be well d On 1/14/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you been able to export the whole movie to WMV with Quicktime? I think it exports the first 10 sec. or so as a trial, but you need to upgrade to Flip4Mac Studio to be able to really export WMV (that costs $99 if I recall... if that's free now then I will definitely be contacting them for my money back as I bought a license several months ago). -- URL: http://29fragiledays.blogspot.com URL: http://www.kleindesign.co.uk YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Windown Media Player For Mac Gonzo?
Yeah, they replaced it with Flip4Mac. I haven't been able to get audio streaming working with Flip4Mac onFirefox or Safari on Mac 10.3.9 Otherwise, Flip4Mac is pretty good. On 1/13/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1040_22-6026715.html From the ZDnet article: Microsoft has officially halted development of its Windows Media Player for the Mac and plans no future Apple Computer versions of its music-playing software, CNET News.com has learned. -- cheers r Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively My Vlog: http://r.24x7.com A Good Deal: http://foo.24x7.com -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] QuickTime 7.0.1 reinstaller
FYI Apple Releases QuickTime 7.0.1 Reinstaller Some users are having trouble with the QuickTime 7.0.4 patch released by Apple Tuesday, prompting the company to request that users restore QuickTime 7.0.1. The reinstaller is available on the QuickTime support page. http://www.macobserver.com/article/2006/01/13.13.shtml http://www.apple.com/support/quicktime/ -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] more macworld keynote, podcast studio part of Garageband
9:48 am Steve demoing Garageband with Podcast studio now. 9:47 am Garageband. New podcast studio. Podcast artwork track. over 200 free jingles and effects. speech enhanccer. use iChat for remote interviews. iChat suggests video support possible http://www.macrumorslive.com/web/ -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] no videoblogging in updated iMovie
FYI I'm following the macworld keynote and the imovie demo ended with no mention of video blogging. The iphoto demo did include a new photoblogging new feature -- allowing people to blog photos from iphoto with a .mac account. -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Newsvine Out of the Dark
If anyone with an invite out there would be so kind as to invite me it would be much appreciated. [EMAIL PROTECTED] thx On 1/6/06, Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, I want you bill for the UKVloggers, please join, could do with your input on video conferences. Paul On 6 Jan 2006, at 22:40, Bill Streeter wrote: Let me be the first to say I would like an invite. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Newsvine.com has opened up invitation to a private beta. Here is some background info... // START QUOTE At Newsvine, you can read breaking news from around the world, write your own articles, and publish links from across the web directly to your column. You'll also keep ad revenue from all traffic your pages generate. Feel free to register and select a domain name for yourself (yourname.newsvine.com) whenever you'd like. It's all free of course. In order to let all citizens of the Newsvine community control its growth and usership, we are keeping access to Newsvine invite-only for the time being. As a reward for bringing positive members into the community, you'll receive 10% of the ad earnings from their column, which you can either donate to your charity of choice or keep for yourself. You have 20 invites for now. You don't have to use all your invites at once. Enter email addresses into this form to start sending invites now. // END QUOTE I've seeded a few in this community and each user is limited to only 20 invites... so ask around. It is still pretty hard to get, but you'll be hearing more about this site in the near future. Not sure what the future plans are (if any) for video. -Matt --- http://vlogmap.org http://leanbackvids.com http://ridertech.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS ▪ Visit your group videoblogging on the web. ▪ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com It's worth a laugh and work friendly. -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: M4V and MOV video formats
Does anyone know if Apple recommends an official mime type for M4V? I'm using video/mp4, I used video/quicktime for a while but browsers would tack on a .MOV extension when I did that. On 1/6/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: B Yen wrote: On Jan 5, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Bill Streeter wrote: You need to change the server to acknowlege that m4v is a video format. Interesting Note: My podcast reflects my video-blog at http://jumplive.blogspot.com, in the past when you click on a .m4v file (under OSX/Safari) you got a download of gibberish characters. Now, it plays fine using QT player. Does this mean Apple is steadily getting the .m4v integrated as a solution? I.e., eventually you don't have to change .m4v to .mp4? Most likely it means that the people who run the server got around to adding m4v with the proper mime-type. The gibberish characters you mention is due to the fact that most installs of Apache (and other web servers I'd guess) do not know what an 'm4v' file is, so they send it as text/plain. Until people complain and the server admin fixes things. Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Questions on Formats to Post for Vlog.
One thing the M4V extension does do is that iTunes maps that file extension to itself. So if you want the file to be double-clicked and opened in QuickTime, you would prefer the mp4 extension. My feeling is that Apple invented it specifically to be an iTunes video file (as opposed to a QuickTime file). The default behavior (on Firefox and Safari anyway) when opening the file from a server in a browser, whether it be m4v or mp4 or mov, is to play it in the QT plugin (as long as the mime type is set correctly on the server). I think IE's default is to prompt one to download it. On 1/6/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: iPod will play mov and mp4. It depends more on the resolution and bitrate. m4v is not actually anything other than an mp4 with h.264 codec, aac audio, and specific resolution and bitrate settings optimized for iPod. So really, m4v is a made up file extension. It should actually be mp4, as that's really the correct file type. It is often preferable to edit the filename replacing .m4v extension with .mp4 as that is more accurately what the file *is*. -Josh On 1/6/06, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi cheryl, i have been using blip.tv for some time now and am very happy it i notice that some people post their videos there in two formats: quicktime and windows media for myself, i only upload quicktime videos as .mov files, generally using the settings from freevlog.org however, more and more people are now using the iPod m4v format instead it's your call as to how many formats you wish to support i'm always toying with the idea of providing wmv files for Internet Explorer users, but never get around to it (sorry IE users!) markus www.CherylShuman.com wrote: Dear Vlogging Group, I have a question regarding exporting formats. At the moment I have both PC and Mac. On my Powerbook, the IMovie has a setting direct for the Video Ipod. I've been exporting in that format as well as Windows Media. Is there a general rule of thumb for exporting in other formats? I'm not sure what proper protocol is. Also, when I export in Mp4 and .mov format from my new powerbook, it won't play on last year's Mac. I tried to download the updated Quicktime pro 7, but it won't download. I'm not sure what to do. Does this mean I should export in several formats or ??? Also, I recently was told about blip.tv and other distribution outlets. In the group's opinion, where is the best place to actually post your videoblogs? I would appreciate the feedback. Thank you in advance. Happy New Year Everyone. Cheryl Shuman Yahoo! Groups Links . -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://node101.org http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Apple video podcasting app?
Does that make any sense? Why would they integrate video podcast (or vlogging or whatever) creation?/viewing?/subscribing? into Garageband? I never use it, but isn't it an audio creation application? The ability to import vid into GB is probably just to extract the audio in one step. suggesting support for Video Podcasts is very vague. What does support mean? Play them? Make them? Subscribe to them? All of the above? It would make much more sense to build video podcast creation into iMovie and marry it to .Mac. On 1/5/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Macworld Expo is next week. Will Apple release software to make video podcasting easier? http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/01/20060105114200.shtml Readers note that it appears that according to this page, you can import Video to Garageband, suggesting support for Video Podcasts. Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Apple video podcasting app?
(I'll reply to myself) I see from this screenshot: http://tinyurl.com/9h2qd That there's a Working with Podcasts support topic. It makes sense to roll audio podcast creation into GarageBand I suppose... but video? On 1/5/06, T.Whid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does that make any sense? Why would they integrate video podcast (or vlogging or whatever) creation?/viewing?/subscribing? into Garageband? I never use it, but isn't it an audio creation application? The ability to import vid into GB is probably just to extract the audio in one step. suggesting support for Video Podcasts is very vague. What does support mean? Play them? Make them? Subscribe to them? All of the above? It would make much more sense to build video podcast creation into iMovie and marry it to .Mac. On 1/5/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Macworld Expo is next week. Will Apple release software to make video podcasting easier? http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/01/20060105114200.shtml Readers note that it appears that according to this page, you can import Video to Garageband, suggesting support for Video Podcasts. Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] iPod QT m4v format problems
You shouldn't rename it to .MOV.Add the MIME type for M4V to your server instead. This will fix the problem with browsers handling the file in the wrong way (downloading as plain text).I use the mime type video/mp4 for M4V files on my server (suggested by J. Kinberg on this list). If you don't know how to set the mime type, do a search for addtype and .htaccess. Some hosted servers don't allow .htaccess files. You can also add mime types to IIS if you are running your own Windows server. On 1/4/06, John Mayes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Vloggers,Thanks for eveyones help yesterday. I have installed the feed enclosure plugin and it seems to be working great and it improved the reliability of the feed. I'm not sure I understand the difference between the atom.xml and the RSS index.xml output files for Moveable Type so if anyone can explain I would appreciate it.Anyway the feed seems to work better, but when downloads are done using iTunes through a podcast subscription ... the file looks like it is downloading and then when it completes it does not load the file as if it is the wrong format and leaves and exclaimation mark next to it instead. Likewise when i click on the link in the block to access the same file I am taken to a page with the quicktime logo as it downloads and that logo eventually turns into a Question Mark indicating it does not know what to do with the file. FireAnt on the other hand has no problem downloading the file and playing it ... I have another problem there however in that FireAnt attempts to play the QT file and our Flashfile in the RSS feed viewer below the video so that provides some confusion. Now one thing that you should know is I have exported the files using QT pro to the M4V format but renamed the files with the MOV suffix. I did this because previously when I had uploaded files with the M4V extension and tried to view them through the web with a browser I got back text encoding in the browser rather than the QT File. I have had more luck with the MOV extension. To check out our blog and feed go to ...http://www.choosecast.com/charlotte/lifeseens feed://feeds.feedburner.com/choosecast/charlotte/lifeseensHELP! Anyone have any insight into why I am having file format or transfer problems with the QT files? John MayesProduction Technology ManagerWe Can Choose, Inc 831 East Morehead Street, Suite 740Charlotte, North Carolina 28202704-377-2870 ext.13 [EMAIL PROTECTED]www.ChooseCharlotte.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] professional vlog start up
Am I missing something with Wordpress? I wanted multiple video format feeds from one blog and had to hack together my own solution (wasn't hard if one knows a tad of PHP, but still). This was using WP 1.5... Does WP 2.0 handle multiple video format feeds better? If anyone knows, please enlighten me :-) On 1/2/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rocketboom uses MovableType. A lot of people use Wordpress and it gives great results too. -Josh On 1/1/06, Misha Kleider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, i would like to start up a fancy looking vlog. is movable type the format to use or should i make my own set up starting from scratch? what would you recommend. oh, what does rocket boom or other really successful vlogs use? thanks, kind regards, misha kleider Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Dream Host?? Is it a Dream? I'm thinking of hosting my site there. Rob
I use Dreamhost for a few different sites. I used to think they were the superb, but one of my sites has been having downtime, problems with PHP, mysql databases going down. It was only a few hours over a few months... but it got to be annoying when it happened a couple of months in a row. It wasn't horrible and when I called customer support and complained they immediately comped me a free month. I've found their support to be pretty good. They respond fairly quickly to emails and will give you call backs too. All in all i recommend them. On 1/2/06, Rob Parrish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] The Chronic - What - kals of Narnia!
This is extremely funny. http://www.youtube.com/watch.php?v=zLElfJ9YCh0 -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Fwd: RHIZOME_RAW: Mobile Exposure 2006 Call for Works
was this submitted to the list? if dupes, sorries. -- Forwarded message -- From: T.Whid [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Dec 16, 2005 5:00 PM Subject: Fwd: RHIZOME_RAW: Mobile Exposure 2006 Call for Works To: Bill Hallinan [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andre Sala [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Forwarded message -- From: Stephanie Martz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Dec 16, 2005 4:28 PM Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: Mobile Exposure 2006 Call for Works To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile Exposure * An international touring exhibition of moving image art made by and for mobile devices * Presented by Microcinema International * Curators: Patrick Lichty and Microcinema International * Judges: Addictive TV (United Kingdom) * Excerpts to premiere at San Francisco International Film Festival * Deadline: Received by March 31, 2006 * Screenings: worldwide * Grand Prize: Panasonic AG-DVX100A 1/3 3-CCD 24P/30P/60i DV Cinema Camera * Fees: US$5 * More information write: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TWO SCREENING PROGRAMS Mobile Exposure 2006 (moving images made by mobile devices) Mobile Exposure 2006 Video Ringtone Festival (on-line/on-mobile device) Mobile phones, PDA's, i-pods, and other hand-held devices have already gained widespread acceptance as tools to capture as well as experience music and photographs. Now these devices are being further designed and equipped with video capabilities - both for viewing as well as capturing. What are the potentials of the handheld device as a cinematic tool for expression, activism, experimentation, and exhibition? With the recent announcement of the i-pod video device and the Emmy Awards creation of a new mobile film category, the advancement of this medium is now a foregone conclusion...the train has left the station that is for sure, but on what track is it heading? How will viewing images on the small screen change our perception of the moving image arts? How will the moving image arts change to present works on a hand-held device? These are some of the questions that Mobile Exposure 2006 hopes to address. CONCEPT Mobile Exposure 2006 is looking for works that address mobile culture and/or are made WITH or to be EXHIBITED ON mobile/handheld devices. Our criteria are very broad; reflect on the mobile and locative through the medium or the concept. We encourage hybrid works as well (for example: imagery made with hand-helds and then post produced, mixed with sound in a classic filmmaking procedure). CALL FOR WORKS The Mobile Exposure 2006 handheld moving image program is an exploration of the potentials of mobile video and culture. Practitioners are invited to submit all genres of work, less than 15 minutes in length. Video Ringtones should be 2 minutes or less in length. WHAT WE WANT: We are looking for two types of works: Made for viewing on a mobile device and Made WITH a mobile device for viewing on the big screen (or little screen too if possible). We are looking for works made using cell phones, obsolete video cameras, wrist cams, toy (NON-vhs/dv/hi-8) video cameras, PDA's, and even small cameras that create mpg moving images. Please do not send any material using conventional video cameras unless it specifically relates to mobile culture. For films destined FOR the small screens of hand-held devices, any method of filmmaking is acceptable. SUBMISSION GUIDELINES and CHECKLIST see our Submission FAQ see the Submission Checklist You must fill out the on-line form found here: Submission Form (for all calls). FEES: US$5.00 payable by check, money or credit card/Paypal online. Please send check with submission or PAY ONLINE. Please send us your screeners on VHS, CD, mini-DV, or DVD, readable on PC. PAL or NTSC accepted for screeners. DVDs region 1 or 0 only. For exhibition we will require works on mini-DV (preferred) or unauthored DVD (mpeg, avi, or mov files only). Mini-DV PAL or NTSC OK. Unauthored data files must be in NTSC. We may also accept some video ringtone submissions via upload. DVDs region 1 or 0 only. Must be 15 minutes or less, including all titles...NO EXCEPTIONS. Ringtones 2 minutes or less. For works destined for the big screen please make sure that frame rates and screen size are viewable (720 x 480 format preferred for NTSC, analogous for PAL). A brief synopsis of the work(s) of up to 150 words and a short biography of the artists of up to 50 words maximum is also requested. Still .jpeg or .gif (PC formatted) should be included on a CD along with biographical materials and synopses. Please include a stamped, self-addressed postcard that we will send back to you as indication of reception of your film. ALL SUBMITTED ITEMS (papers, DVDs, tapes, cards, etc) MUST HAVE THE ARTIST NAME, NAME OF THE WORK, CONTACT, AND WHICH SECTION OF THE FESTIVAL YOU ARE SUBMMITING TO WRITTEN CLEARLY. Deadline: March 31, 2006 (arrival at the address below) Please mail all submissions to: Independent Exposure 2006 c/o Microcinema
Re: [videoblogging] Yet another NYT article on vlogging
Josh,Your response to a silly journalist laziness (flogging a stereotype) isn't ingratitude, it's common sense.On 12/11/05, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am happy that My vlog was mentioned in the video Podcast article...I am happy that my picture wound up on there too...However I am not happy that my Vlog (which has around 70 videos) has been brought to the world with this phrase like a college kid in Michigan playing drunken miniature golf, Really? is that all my Vlog is? I would love it If when I got a mention in a international news paper that it said something like: Josh Leo's Vlog is really well done and entertaining Josh Leo is a very good story teller Josh Leo's Vlog is consistent and always funInstead, I get lumped with all the college kids who make videos of their friends puking, crashing their bikes, shooting fireworks out of their mouths and getting drunk in front of the camera. I would like to think that what II am doing is more than just some college kid getting drunk in front of a camera. I would like to get proper representation. ok, begin the Josh you are a self-centered ass who is never satisfied with anything who should be grateful for all you have gotten so far emails flow... -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types
How are you setting the mime-type? I had the same issue and setting the .htaccess file fixed it (both in browsers and so that wordpress recognized it and created the enclosure tags). I first set it as video/quicktime and now just changed it to video/mp4 per Josh's suggestion. Are you certain that you are allowed to use an .htaccess file on your server? On 12/9/05, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I check the camera ratings and most are rated to -40 below C (I believe that at -35 C and F the temperatures become the same? I had all systems go, although there are steps to take to protect gear. Put 'em in the bag when they aren't in use, avoid frost etc. I tried Josh's suggestion and no luck. The video/mp4 fails, too. Feedburner doesn't see it to make it an enclosure. I've made it m4v for a specific reason, and while I most likely won't be using it on a regular basis since 3ivx-encoded MOVs work on the iPod, it is probably safe to assume that more people will use m4v as a publishing mechanism (like wmv or whatnot---it's not our job to dictate that)... I'll need to make 3gp feeds direct to phones that possibly won't go the way of MOV. If japan is an indicator, we'll see WMV on phones before MOV. Loose predictions, I might be wrong. Still something to consider. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've banned the great white north. Cameras don't work well below 32 degrees. It's bad enough here in michigan where it gets down to like ten degrees. As for this MIME thing... I'm thinking it's the extentsion not the MIME type. Now feedburner IS turning it into an enclosure right? What aabout changing it to MOV? The extention is much more recognizeable, more likely too work and technically a m4v will only play in Quicktime anyway. Personaly... I say fusck all that... mp4 is the way to go. 100% the future... Supported on the PSP and video iPod and more of an open and common standard than anything else. Also, probably a much much more recognized extention. -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Eric Rice wrote: Hi folks, I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment) and I posted the first of a few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns jibberish text in the browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files). Here's the stitch: In order to troubleshoot this, I created a MIME type for video/quicktime for m4v on my server, and it failed. I then created a MIME for video/ mpeg, and included the standard mpeg types with m4v. Failed. For the life of me, I can NOT get this to work. Any enclosure-aware software will see the post but not the media file. Thoughts? Eric ericrice.com PS You haven't *lived* until you've rocked the -15/-25 degree weather vlogger-style, natch ;-) Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda
Link to the NYT?On 12/9/05, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaaaddd it's the big sellout!From this weekend's NYT:Giving up no creative control, Ms. Congdon and Mr. Baron will get 50 percent of the revenue from ads sold by TiVo to appear before and after their newscast, and their show will gain access to more than 300,000 TV sets connected to those new TiVo boxes.Let the tomato-throwing begin. huge grinOf course, I'm really insanely jealous! Congrats again, guys. And they're not the only ones mentioned - dig this: The best vlogs, like Scratch Video and Minnesota Stories,above, can turn personal narrative about the tedious or mundane into microdocumentaries of wit, beauty and intelligence. A year ago there were fewer than two dozen active vlogs; now there are some 2,000.-- best regards,Deirdré Straughan www.beginningwithi.com (personal) www.tvblob.com (work) SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] DivX - Shameless Plug
Hi,Re: DVD playersThe link on the download page is broken, can you provide one? And, is this a list of compatible DVD players?On 12/8/05, Jim Vinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have playback implementations in all of these areas. DivX is an mpeg-4 implementation. One mis-understanding is that because mpeg-4 is a standards based format that they all are about the same quality. For example, tests show DivX performs better than baseline h.264. That isn't to say that h.264 can't be better than DivX, but baseline implementations (i.e. h.264 for ipod) won't be as good as DivX. By standard, what I mean is that other encoders can make video streams that can be decoded by divx and vice versa. There are limitations. We are working on a simple app that can check any video to see if our decoders can play the video. If it can then it means ALL divx decoders can play the file, including the 50+ million certified DVD players out there. I'm not sure if that was the question. Am I close? Jim Vinson From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Joshua Kinberg Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 11:57 AM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] DivX - Shameless Plug So, can you explain a little more what does this statement means: This puts a standard mpeg-4 based playback in the quicktime player, windows media player, consumer electronics devices. The converter is very easy, just drag and drop, or you can export from quicktime pro directly to DivX. -Josh On 12/8/05, Jim Vinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They will have to have something installed that can decode divx. I don't know about the full integration with these other decoders inside quicktime, but xvid, vlc and a fist full of other programs can decode DivX video. Jim V From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Joshua Kinberg Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 11:40 AM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] DivX - Shameless Plug So if I encode with DivX, the video can be played in QT Player and Windows Media Player? But the viewer has to have DivX codec installed, right? -josh On 12/8/05, JV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A little shameless plug http://www.divx.com/divx/mac/ There is a free trial, but if anyone needs a sn, drop me a line and I'll get you one. This is the first time we have had our mac development ahead of PC development (don't worry, the PC side is almost done ;) ) This puts a standard mpeg-4 based playback in the quicktime player, windows media player, consumer electronics devices. The converter is very easy, just drag and drop, or you can export from quicktime pro directly to DivX. We also have released the open source encoding application Dr. DivX at www.drdivx.com. It is only compiled for PC right now, but we should have Linux and Mac installers coming along. There are a few more widgets we are working on, but they are about a month out. If you have any questions, hit me up Thanks, Jim V [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] bloggerheads.tv
I subbed using TVTonic and it worked fine, downloaded speedily and etc.. It's valid according to feed validator: http://tinyurl.com/7qfdo -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid On 12/7/05, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a feed: http://bloggingheads.tv/rss.php WMV enclosures does this work for you...for soem reason its not leting me subscribe to it. jay -- Adventures in Videoblogging URL: http://www.momentshowing.net http://feeds.feedburner.com/Momentshowing http://getFireAnt.com Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: camcorder to hard drive
Bill's suggestion is a good one. Just to add, you can capture with QT Pro 7 as well -- unsure if it works on Windows. On 12/2/05, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah there are a few options for this. There are some products that are camera mounted direct to disk hard drives. They're kind of expensive, at least the ones I've seen at BH photo. There is a budget way of doing this. You can capture direct to a laptop HD via firewire. I don't know what options there are to do this on a Mac but you can do it via Final Cut Pro or Express or iMovie on a mac very easily. This is a great option for stationary or studio work but not so good if you need the camera to be mobile. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, DrLinton Hutchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For those Video Gurus out there - I have a question Is there a camcorder that you can be shooting and at the same time it saves to an external hard drive rather than tape? A 3 chip version would be a preference, but one that can be recording action and also saving it to a hard drive would be perfect! Thanks in advance With friendly greetings, Linton Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] ffmpegX for mac now supports ipod h264
They render really fast too. My experience is that, tho I think the H264 looks better at smaller sizes, it's slow as dirt to encode. At least with QT... haven't tried any other encoders. cheers, On 12/2/05, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ive been using it and its AMAZING how small in file size H.264s are compared to Mpeg and 3ivx. They render really fast too. H264 will take over quickly, I think, because its that much better. On Dec 2, 2005, at 2:41 PM, Steve Watkins wrote: New version of ffmpegx came out the other day that apparently supports ipod h264, Im just giving it a try now. Its probably a bit too nerdy for some, hopefully iSquint will be able to learn the h264 ipod secrets used in this ffmpegX, and also add ipod 264 support. ffmpegx: http://homepage.mac.com/major4/ isquint: http://homepage.mac.com/tylerl82/ -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] QT 7 Poster Frames / WAS Blogger templates SPECIFIALLY for bloggers
I've seen some very buggy behavior on the Windows version -- out of sync audio/video, jittery, the plugin sometimes kills the browser. On Mac I've seen some of this, but pretty rarely. One would think that it would be unbuggy (since it's a core port of OSX), but they threw together the new iTunes (with podcast, vid store and video ipod integration) so quickly that maybe they skimped a bit on the QA? On 11/30/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I feel like QT 7 is very buggy. It often stutters and causes my iBook (Panther, not Tiger) to freeze up occasionally. Can anyone else confirm this behavior? This poster image bug is another log to add to the fire on that... -josh On 11/30/05, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This brings up a QT 7 issue. Regularly set poster frames in QT6 to great effect. But in QT 7 when I open a .mov with a poster frame, it begins playing from the poster frame rather than the beginning of the video. Because I'm doing lots of presentations that screwed with the flow - to add the additional step of hitting rewind before playing a file. Anyone got suggestions / workarounds? Jan -- It isn't done alone. Pay more. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roadnode101/ - education http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - media http://the-hold.blogspot.com - literature . On Nov 29, 2005, at 8:45 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote: I don't know the specifics of MeFeedia's server setup or queueing mechanism. I don't know if its able to fail gracefully and move on when it encounters errors. There are lots of video codecs out there -- not every QT, WMV, AVI, etc. are made equally. As for setting a poster frame... yes, do that. Its generally good practice, though most people tend to disregard. In FireAnt on Windows we extract thumbnails that display in your collection of videos. If you've set a poster frame, that is the image that gets extracted. -Josh On 11/29/05, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but the argument stands Markus Sandy wrote: but do the math: there are less than 2000 feeds as of today i think 500 videos per feed is grossly over estimating most people's *average* output that's 100,000 thumbs we have been told that they have been generating them for several weeks (months?) now let's assume only 6 weeks = 6 x 7 x 24 x 60 = 60480 minutes that's 16 minutes per thumb and counting more likely, there is an average of less than 200 videos per feed at this time so 40 minutes per thumb or higher? wow, that's a lot! this still does not explain why older video thumbs are not slowly showing up for me and why some new ones aren't (no changes in codec here) Joshua Kinberg wrote:Thumbnail generation is a very CPU intensive process. Mefeedia's server must download your videos, extract thumbs and save them, then remove the video. Not to mention there are often errors due to various video codecs and the fact that it can be hard to decode all types and extract images. Even Yahoo! has difficulty in this area, and they have much better server resources than MeFeedia. Someone in Yahoo! Media Search once told me that it can take several days for a video to be indexed properly even after the crawler has discovered the video. Its for the same exact reason. There is a batch queue set up to extract the thumbnails and do whatever other processing needed on the file before it gets indexed properly by the search engine. -Josh On 11/29/05, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our thumbnail generating code got a bit behind, but it will catch up soon. On 11/29/05, Christopher Ivanyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Problem with using mefeedia's archive code is that it does not consistently show thumbnails for all videos. Why do some vlogs don't have pics, and others do not. That's been an ongoing problem for a long, long time. Chris On 11/29/05, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: set blogger to show one post per page that takes care of question #1 you can use mefeedia's archive code to display a list of thmbnails for previous shows http://mefeedia.com --Steve On Nov 29, 2005, at 11:18 AM, Fire wrote: Id like a template that could make my site (look and operate) like rocketboom.com (see below) I like their interface... nice and simple... with the most current video automatically loading on the first page, and thumbnails of the recently archived ones below... --Steve -- Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com Video Blog - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Check out this video on DVblog
On 11/28/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, T.Whid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://dvblog.org/the-worlds-largest-tv-studio +++ talking about this same stuff over 30 years ago... I bet there was some people talking about similar issues of a honest, distributed media when the Gutenberg press came into popular use. Absolutely. In the monarchy's that dominated Europe when the printing press was invented it was many times a crime to own one that wasn't licensed by the gov't. Another good read about early use of video by independents: Radical Software http://www.radicalsoftware.org Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Create 2 feeds for different media formats in Wordpress 1.5 (quick and dirty)
Hi folks, I posted my little hack on my blog. Hope it's helpful to someone. I would be interested in hearing any other ideas on how to work with Wordpress feeds. http://tinyurl.com/9o87l -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: separate RSS for second video format
Hi,I hacked wp a bit to make two diff feeds for one post (if you provide links in one post for two diff media files so that wp's default behavior is to create 2 enclosures). It's pretty simple.. you just provide a format via a query string and filter the enclosure routine to only write the enclosure to the feed that matches the format you want. If anyone is interested let me know and I'll try to provide more details. I can't do it right now as presently I'm a bit tipsy and stuffed from the turkey day din.caio, On 11/24/05, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Josh,I was thinking about this since i use Wordpress...I know I can have feeds for each category but how can I make aseparate feed without duplicating posts?VerdiOn Nov 24, 2005, at 4:10 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote: Or maybe its time to ween off Blogger to something that provides more options and customizability... Wordpress, MovableType, TypePad, and there are plenty of others... -josh On 11/24/05, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep, that works.Just take the rss feed from delicious and run it through feedburner.I just tried it - works great. -Verdi On Nov 24, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Tom wrote: Thanks Michael, but still...I would prefer to have one bolg... following your advice - what if I use del.icio.us instead of second blog and tag my another video format (let's say 3gp) there, then copy del.icio.us RSS tagged 3gp and paste it (as a separate feed) to my main blog. Does it make sense? t URL: http://www.fastmovinganimals.blogspot.com/ FEED: http://feeds.feedburner.com/FastMovingAnimals --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Tom, You can - though it's kind of clumsy.Since you're using blogspot, just set up a second blog (don't publicize it) and copy and past your regular posts over there.Just remember to change the url of the video.Then set up a feedburner feed and put the button on your main blog. Verdi, -- Me: http://michaelverdi.com RD: http://graymattergravy.com Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM~- Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] for the new people on this group
Hi Josh, It's more than simple 'buzz factor.' Most people don't know what or how to connect to media via xml feeds. 'Podcast' is making headway as the generic term to describe this via Apple's (and others') marketing and promotion. To simply add 'video' to podcast becomes a very simple way to extend what people already know. Vlog isn't good as it is meaningless to anyone that doesn't know the 'v' stands for video. Videoblog is better and more precise if you are talking about a website in blog format that also has video and feeds associated with it. Video podcast is more precise when talking specifically about the feed and any web site associated with it is simply that, associated with it, but not crucial to it. The dangerous part is if one uses the term 'podcast' people might become confused and think that it only works with an ipod or is meant to be used in association with an ipod. I've seen a few launches of video feeds recently where the only instructions they give on how to use it is to use iTunes. This is a problem (I'm sure you'll agree). On 11/23/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't you mean video podcast? I'm joking, of course, but I've noticed a lot of people in this group change their weblog title or description to include the phrase video podcast since the release of the video iPod. Is this simply to gain a little extra Google-juice with the hopes of snagging those searching for the phrase? I'm personally still on the side of videoblog or the shortened vlog for a number of reasons... many of them already discussed here... I'm just curious to know if there's another reason people are opting for video podcast other than the recent buzz factor? Josh -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] for the new people on this group
yo to you, On 11/23/05, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yo, podcast is utterly the worst word that could have ever come out of audioblogging and now videoblogging. i absolutely despise it. why? because any term that references a specific product from a specific company that is in no way exclsuive to what it is is wrong and confusing. a danger that I mentioned in my email also, you say: To simply add 'video' to podcast becomes a very simple way to extend what people already know. wrong.. most people know podcasts as being internet radio... audio! so, in essence, your saying adding video makes sense to prelude an audio term. video radio anyone? I don't agree. they understand it as 'subscribing' to 'something' to get audio. When you add video it's instantly recognizable as 'subscribing' to 'something' to get not audio, now video. dont forget, also T Whid, there is establishment in the videoblogging community we had vloggercon and several projects and events use 'vlog' in their names. Dont tell us that we should change all that just because an apple video iPod came out shit, i have had a portable video player for over a year no change in terminology and vocabulary required upon purchase. I'm not telling you to change anything I would encourage you to call it whatever you like. But I'm interested in explaining this stuff to people who may not know anything about it and the shortest possible route presently is 'video podcast.' Apple, Curry and others are pouring lots of time and dollars in making the podcast term understood by ordinary consumers. And presently the way they're defining it is broad enough that it doesn't conflict with the message I want to get out. Why shouldn't I take advantage of the education they're doing? It may come back to bite me in the ass, but for now it seems worth it. sull On 11/23/05, T.Whid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Josh, It's more than simple 'buzz factor.' Most people don't know what or how to connect to media via xml feeds. 'Podcast' is making headway as the generic term to describe this via Apple's (and others') marketing and promotion. To simply add 'video' to podcast becomes a very simple way to extend what people already know. Vlog isn't good as it is meaningless to anyone that doesn't know the 'v' stands for video. Videoblog is better and more precise if you are talking about a website in blog format that also has video and feeds associated with it. Video podcast is more precise when talking specifically about the feed and any web site associated with it is simply that, associated with it, but not crucial to it. The dangerous part is if one uses the term 'podcast' people might become confused and think that it only works with an ipod or is meant to be used in association with an ipod. I've seen a few launches of video feeds recently where the only instructions they give on how to use it is to use iTunes. This is a problem (I'm sure you'll agree). On 11/23/05, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't you mean video podcast? I'm joking, of course, but I've noticed a lot of people in this group change their weblog title or description to include the phrase video podcast since the release of the video iPod. Is this simply to gain a little extra Google-juice with the hopes of snagging those searching for the phrase? I'm personally still on the side of videoblog or the shortened vlog for a number of reasons... many of them already discussed here... I'm just curious to know if there's another reason people are opting for video podcast other than the recent buzz factor? Josh -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Links -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directory http://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from
Re: [videoblogging] for the new people on this group
according to those #s, video podcast is doing pretty crappy too :-( On 11/23/05, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These are searches people made NOT results. Lots of people are looking for ipod video, fewer are searching for vlogs. On Nov 23, 2005, at 9:39 AM, Steve Garfield wrote: A search over at http://inventory.overture.com gives these results for October searches: vlog - 3,199 videoblog - 366 video blog - 6,353 video podcast - 1,360 ipod video - 86,341 --Steve -- -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpTY2A/lzNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: vlog art
In full agreement, really nice vlog using the language of video to address an important issue. Looks to be using broadcast machine. Also another new vlog about art popped-up today too: http://www.culturetv.tv (m4v files, feed link on the front page of course) And in more art vlog news... Yours truly is working on a net art project using the techniques and language of vlogs that I hope to release soon-ish. Stay tuned for the release of the Karaoke DeathMatch 100 :-) Using Wordpress as the engine. Had to hack it a bit to get it to generate two separate feeds for different video formats -- perhaps there's an easier way, but the beauty of OSS allowed me to change the code a bit to work for my own purposes. If anyone is interested, I can share what I did. It's very specific to my need (and I'm lazy and didn't want to make it more universal), but could be easily adapted. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, MICA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: an interesting use of videoblog for art and awareness. http://www.chrisbarr.net/projects/17minutes/ -- Mica Scalin Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: MacTech Magazine
I hate 'vodcasting' more than all the rest :-) um, on topic.. haven't seen it. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.mactech.com/ November 2005 Issue cover story - * Vodcasting: Exploring the Future of Syndicated Media Has anyone seen this? --Steve Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Internet television station
Or check out broadcast machine: http://participatoryculture.org/broadcast/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Internet Television? Check out http://FreeVlog.org Create a videoblog with an RSS feed. Then download FireAnt at http://GetFireAnt.com subscribe to your new RSS channel and tell others to do the same. Now your making Internet Television! which isn't really television at all. -josh On 11/13/05, dnet4me [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone tell me what service is available that I can use to set up a Internet television station.Thank you. Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: why does an .mp4 ask to open up QuickTime
what is the browser/OS you're using?
I'm not sure regarding mp4, but I wanted m4v files to be handled by quicktime
and had to
add the mime type to my server, otherwise the server would send it with a
default mime
type and you would see the binary data rendered in the browser as text. After I
added the
mime type as video/quicktime the browser handles it as a quicktime (using
whatever the
browser is set up to do with that sort of file). So on my Mac they just render
in the browser
using the qt plugin (except for stupid IE).
This might be what you're seeing?
Actually, I just checked your URL and what happens for me in Safari is I see
the binary data
rendered in the browser. A small example:
!#$%'()*+,-./0123456789:;=[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
\`XUOYa\[hyWmdR]Ye\\ikit°mJk]s__lco_z?wllakSPo?w`zhr?z|xvjÆ?gpqows|
²mqfxl?iiddqkhn?ßÄ_txj?s{hy
So yeah, maybe you want to add the mime type as video/mpeg or something? You
can do
it in an .htaccess file if you're using Apache:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/mod/
mod_mime.html#addtype
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does an .mp4 ask to open up QuickTime, instead of playing the video
in a new browser window?
POST
http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2005/11/video-umass-video-blogging-
class.html
VIDEO
http://clips1.vimeo.com/video_files/2005/11/10/vimeo.26227.mp4
Something to do with a host setting?
--Steve
--
Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
Video Blog - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com
Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com
Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: YouTube - WTF?
Part of the reason they do well is that their interface and features are very good IMHO. I'm not that familiar, but based on a quick perusal, they are doing lots of stuff right (social connections, RSS feed (with enclosures), tags, aggregating, ease-of-use, xml-rpc interface). They are doing lots of stuff wrong too of course (evil EULA, nasty logo bug, wonky flash format). I've not tried to upload a video so I can't comment on how the quality of that part of the service. I'm sure the VCs simply looked at the numbers, if the numbers are there they figure the money will follow. I agree with Verdi in that anyone with a smidgeon of sense wouldn't accept their EULA. Obviousely no one with any professional inclinations at all will use the service for this reason, but if it's easy-to-use and free they'll get lots of folks sharing video. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 8, 2005, at 8:13 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote: oh, and of course, let's not forget that the Audience is larger than the pool of Content Creators. VC's know this. These are the people that they are interested in, afterall I get that. But why do users like the service? Is it just because it's been inexplicably written up in places like Slashdot and BoingBoing? It's just hype. This is what bugs the shit out of me. Verdi Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Archiving high-quality orginals?
I've been wondering about this as well, but I very much want to archive the uncompressed DV. Currently I've been buying hard disks every time I need more storage space, obviously this isn't the best long-term solution... or is it? it's getting cheaper and cheaper... What solutions are other people using? tape drives? waiting for larger capacity DVDs? terabytes of hard disks? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You could save a DVD quality NTSC Mpeg2. There's enough info in those to display well on pretty much anything. Plus if you ever feel like making a compilation DVD, the transcoding work is done already. On 11/7/05, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to get in the habit of exporting a high-quality version of all our videos? Using FCP, what file type would be best? I can't afford to keep all the uncompress video on my hard drives, so I'd like to only save the final edited movies (uncompressed). Just trying to think ahead to when we all make it to the big screen. -Matt Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: What do you guys think about Blogtelevision.net
did you try the 'remove your site' link? I'm getting some (what looks to be) unparsed PHP when I clicked on it... --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lynn Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I notice that blogtelevision.net is taking all of the videos that I put up and placing them on their site. They don't give me credit or anything for my work. Do any of you have any feelings towards this site or that issue regarding the usage of your work. They also place a link to the video so that other people can put it on their site but they take the credit for it. Kind of irks me to tell the truth. Lynn Lynn Lane Coal River Pictures/SKILLZ DVD Magazine website: www.CoalRiverPictures.com email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] vlog: http://docmaker.blogspot.com feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/docmaker Coming Soon: www.Vlogumentarian.com www.VlogReporter.com AIVF/IDA Ring 8 Member NYC Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/cd_AJB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: New QuickTime 7.0.2 Released
Yo, After i upgraded and restarted (grumble, grumble) QT auto-launched and I saw this link in their little spam splash that said something like create podcasts with QT 7 pro. Intrigued, I followed the link. Here 'tis: http://www.apple.com/quicktime/tutorials/podcasting.html Was this up before? Strange that they also don't have a 'video podcasting' tute to go with. cheers, twhid www.mtewww.com btw, I like the new iTunes interface.. but their GUI design changes so rapidly now.. kinda weird and ADD-ish. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/cd_AJB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: What's the True Potential of the Videoblogging Community???
re: crooks and liars. I mirrored the video they posted of the Tim Russert interview with a local politician in the NOLA area. blogged: http://dvblog.org/criminal-negligence direct link to the video: http://www.mtaa.net/video/Meet-the-Press-Broussard.mov This man's desperate frustration when dealing with the feds here in the US brought me to tears of shame and rage. What we're dealing with is criminal negligence and dereliction of duty. 1000s are dying because of the Bush Admin's incompetence. Not that the local officials don't deserve some blame (there's plenty to go around) but anyone who tries to tell you that the bulk of responsibility doesn't go to FEMA and the feds is simply a craven sociopathic partisan. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Weagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I second what Quirk says here. This whole disaster has demonstrated once again how worthless the mainstream media is. Things were so bad on the ground in NO that even FOX news reporters were calling bullshit on the scumfucks like bill oreilly and sean hannity back in the studio trying to put the bullshit Bushco spin on things. We also saw brief clips of CNN reporters and others pointing out the utter fraud that is America. Notice this only came about when they were out in the midst of hell watching dead bodies getting eaten by rats, as that professional empty suit Anderson Cooper put it. Only when it gets to the very verge of all-out apocalypse can the mainstream media begin to call it like it is. snip To see some of the stuff I'm talking about, please visit: www.crooksandliars.com They don't seem to have an RSS feed, but so what. Also, please listen to madgeweinstein, who's work over the last few months in AUDIO puts to shame all of us goofing around in VLOG-o-Land: www.yeastradio.com Chris Weagel www.human-dog.com Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: Narrowing Our View Of Video Blogging?
I'm a bit of a noob here and not even a videoblogger, but what the hell, here's my 2¢ below: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, so it was argued earlier, and I recently weighed in on the argument by joking about the poll. Maybe I shouldn't have done that. So let me be a little more specific about my view, especially since I don't come back to this group very often. I have two concerns. First is by all means talk about what Citizen Media means with respect to New Orleans, by all means discuss how vloggers are reporting the news, yes certainly post about techniques being used and problems being solved. But the actual material itself, and where to get it, is not for this group, that's what a videoblog is for. THIS IS A META GROUP FOR VIDEOBLOGGING, NOT A VIDEOBLOG. This group is here to help you report the news on your vlog, not to report it for you. Wasn't this discussion started because of someone posting links to streaming media re: the disaster in NO and environs? I'll assume it was. Couldn't one construe the sharing of this link as information to help a citizen journalist blog? If someone asked how to transcode streaming video to a format for downloading that would be OK? But supplying links to relevant material isn't? Seems an arbitrary distinction to me. If I'm wrong regarding the streaming link feel free to ignore with extreme prejudice. If it was someone posting links to charities or news stories -- then yeah, stop that :-) snip Videoblogging is taking off. We discuss practical issues (bandwidth, process, need for a videoblogging tool) and more philosophical issues (why and what is a videoblog? ...). Join the conversation! A very good group has gathered here to make videoblogging a reality. Creators and developers are equally welcome and needed. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Re: vlognoscenti
ugggh, what does it mean? would it be something like vlognorati? both vlognoscenti and vlognorati are really bad words IMHO :-) --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, jonny goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, I think I just made this word up. And if you are on this list, you are one. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Questions Regarding Sponsorships, Underwriting, Ads, and Rates, etc.
interesting... wonder if it fails quietly if the device is offline... also would want to ensure that the user knows what the dealio is too... --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apparently, with QT files at least, I hear you can install a hyperlink ping to occur at some reference point. So, every time someone watches the end of the commercial, say, you could have the QT file ping a server. On Aug 13, 2005, at 1:48 PM, t.whid wrote: SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: YouTube terms
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, R. Kristiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/9/05, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But why would you live with giving away those rights to YouTube when you can just upload via Ourmeida or Blip and just have them respect the CC license? I agree with Michael Verdi, FWIW. You don't know how much value this stuff may gain in the future, it could be considerable. IMHO, it would be extremely unwise to give away every right you have to your videos at this point in the game. And, by they way, if you agree to those terms you *ARE* giving up every right you have to the video as long as those rights are granted by YouTube (CC be damned): including the unfettered right to sublicense such rights, in perpetuity throughout the universe. YouTube is banking on you thinking like an amateur, no one with any professional urges whatsoever or even the faintest glimmer of hope of a professional career either as a video personality, producer or editor should agree to these terms. I'm not a lawyer, my 2¢. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Disclosures, disclosures
Hi all, The company I work for is developing a TV over IP application called TVTonic (http:// www.tvtonic.com). Presently it's windows-based and focused on the 10ft experience. I'm in charge of the visual design and do a lot of _javascript_, CSS, and HTML. I'm also an artist and have been active in the net art/web art/new media art field since 1997. You can see all the art stuff here: http://mteww.com; blog here: http:// www.mteww.com/mtaaRR My art collaborator and I just finished a new piece called Karaoke Deathmatch 100 which was conceived as a video installation but we plan on making a web-based version that takes the form of a videoblog, should launch sometime in Oct and will run for 10 weeks... Other art works that may be of interest to videobloggers: 1 Year Performance Video (http:/ /turbulence.org/Works/1year/) and Five Small Videos About Interruption and Disappearing (http://www.mteww.com/five_small_videos/). On 8/8/05, R. Kristiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about we all disclose our affiliations? Too radical, eh? SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: just learning html codes
the code you're seeing is outside of any HTML tag. That's always the problem when you see code you don't want to see, it's not surrounded by . --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok group can you tell that I'm just learning html codes. well I messed up big time. I like the effect of the mouse roll over but if you take a look you see the code show through the main page. How do get rid of that and be able to keep the effect. _http://millielaindia.blogspot.com_ (http://millielaindia.blogspot.com) http:_millielaindia.blogspot.com_ (http://millielaindia.blogspot.com/) Member since Monday, July 25, 2005 http:_My first vblog_ (http://millielaindia.blogspot.com/) _my location on the world map_ (http://www.vlogmap.org/?lon=-82.3662lat=27.9278zoom=3) YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: iTunes storage of XML?
Perhaps. H. If I was writing an RSS reader I would think that I would keep the original xml around somewhere until a refresh happened... Apple thinking differently? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chris Nolan.ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it does seem to have it parsed out and included in the usual 'iTunes Music Library.xml' file. Maybe it doesn't cache it at all and just converts it directly to it's native format? Chris Nolan.ca http://ChrisNolan.ca/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
