Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
George V. Reilly wrote: 2008/6/26 Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I also updated the NSIS installer, but I don't think that is relevant. Speaking of which, how do you actually build gvim72a.exe? I tried to build a Vim installer several months ago and gave up in complete frustration. My guess was that you had some additional build scripts which weren't in the SVN archive. The instructions are in Makefile in the top directory. There are no additional build scripts, but you do need lots of stuff (e.g., diff.exe). Getting them from a previous version might help. Or using empty files. Anyway, it would be very helpful to find out how to build a gvim.exe that runs on Windows 98 using VC 2008. Which version of make do you build this Makefile with? Cygwin? Something else? You're supposed to READ the Makefile. The instructions are in the comments. Most things need manual work, like open a new console and set environment for XYZ compile. But you can skip the parts to build for MS-DOS, Windows 3.1 and Win32s. It's pretty tough to find a CD with VC 4.1 anyway :-). -- From know your smileys: :.-( Crying /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ ///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org/// \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org/// --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
Karten Hopp wrote: Bram Moolenaar schrieb: Hello Vim users, Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA This is a BETA release of Vim 7.2. It consists of Vim 7.1 plus all patches, updated runtime files and some more. I expect this to be reasonable stable, since most of the patches have been used by many people already. However, I did include several patches the last few days, this might break something. Please report every problem you find! The time until a 7.2 release depends on how many problems are reported. Just a minor problem: Erlang header files usually have the extension .hrl Could you add .hrl to runtime/filetype.vim, please ? I'll add it. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 95. Only communication in your household is through email. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ ///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org/// \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org/// --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
[...] Looks almost OK. This should be slightly better: dnl sys/ptem.h depends on sys/stream.h on Solaris 9 AC_CHECK_HEADERS(sys/ptem.h, [], [], [#if defined HAVE_SYS_STREAM_H # include sys/stream.h #endif]) Just a nitpick, it's for sure Solaris 8 till latest development build, so plain Solaris instead of Solaris 9 is more accurate. Thank you Bram -- Vlad pgpTwEO9bTQki.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
George V. Reilly wrote: 2008/6/25 Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Patrick Texier wrote: On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:38:14 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: MS-WINDOWS one-size-fits-all: pc/gvim72a.exe self-installing, includes all runtime files gvim.exe doesn't run on Windows 98 (Second Edition 4.10..A French): I have an alert box Program start error: c:\vim\vim72a\gvim.exe file needs an Windows newer version. Update your Windows version. I will compile it. Bummer. I intended to this self-installing executable to run on all MS-Windows systems. Windows 98 should be OK (with some service packs added). I switched to the Visual C++ 2008 express version. Mainly because it's the simplest to use. But if it locks out Windows 98 users that's a bit of a problem. Not sure if it's possible to go back to the 2003 or 2005 version now (they are downloads). George, is this a matter of compilation flags, or is the C++ 2008 version not able to build for Windows 98? Or is this a matter of building with an older set of SDK files? Don't know. It's probably something to do with the C runtime. It may be possible to add some additional compile-time flags. Might be. I still have the VC 2003 runtime files. Mainly because I can't uninstall them (the uninstaller was put in a directory called Temp, duh). I have a number of virtual machine images at home with all the different flavors of VC from VC98 onwards. I'll play around with them tonight on my newly resuscitated Win64 box. (Not sure if I still have a Win9x CD so that I can make a Win9x virtual machine.) I still have them all, back to Windows 3.1 :-). I mosty get the cheaper Update version, so I might actually need them (XP is a full version though, thanks to some friend :-). I also updated the NSIS installer, but I don't think that is relevant. Speaking of which, how do you actually build gvim72a.exe? I tried to build a Vim installer several months ago and gave up in complete frustration. My guess was that you had some additional build scripts which weren't in the SVN archive. The instructions are in Makefile in the top directory. There are no additional build scripts, but you do need lots of stuff (e.g., diff.exe). Getting them from a previous version might help. Or using empty files. Anyway, it would be very helpful to find out how to build a gvim.exe that runs on Windows 98 using VC 2008. -- I AM THANKFUL... ...for the taxes that I pay because it means that I am employed. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ ///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org/// \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org/// --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
Bram Moolenaar schrieb: Hello Vim users, Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA This is a BETA release of Vim 7.2. It consists of Vim 7.1 plus all patches, updated runtime files and some more. I expect this to be reasonable stable, since most of the patches have been used by many people already. However, I did include several patches the last few days, this might break something. Please report every problem you find! The time until a 7.2 release depends on how many problems are reported. Just a minor problem: Erlang header files usually have the extension .hrl Could you add .hrl to runtime/filetype.vim, please ? Thanks ! Karsten --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- diff -up vim72a/runtime/filetype.vim.erlang vim72a/runtime/filetype.vim --- vim72a/runtime/filetype.vim.erlang 2008-06-26 22:55:26.0 +0200 +++ vim72a/runtime/filetype.vim 2008-06-26 22:56:10.0 +0200 @@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ func! s:FTe() endfunc ERicsson LANGuage; Yaws is erlang too -au BufNewFile,BufRead *.erl,*.yaws setf erlang +au BufNewFile,BufRead *.erl,*.hrl,*.yaws setf erlang Elm Filter Rules file au BufNewFile,BufRead filter-rules setf elmfilt
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 22:38, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA Compiled and installed fine on Ubuntu 8.04 with GTK2. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:38:14 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: MS-WINDOWS one-size-fits-all: pc/gvim72a.exe self-installing, includes all runtime files gvim.exe doesn't run on Windows 98 (Second Edition 4.10..A French): I have an alert box Program start error: c:\vim\vim72a\gvim.exe file needs an Windows newer version. Update your Windows version. I will compile it. -- Patrick Texier vim:syntax=mail:ai:ts=4:et:tw=72 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
Hi Vimmers, On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Vim 7.2a is also available from CVS (as soon as it finishes uploading). Subversion will follow later. http://www.vim.org/cvs.php http://www.vim.org/subversion.php The 7.2a BETA is already in Subversion repository. Please check it out by: svn co https://vim.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/branches/vim7.2/ If you had already checked out Vim 7.1 from the Subversion repository, please run: svn co https://vim.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/branches/vim7.2/ In the top level of your checking-out directory to switch to 7.2 branch. Note: https://vim.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/vim7 will still point to the 7.1 branch until 7.2 is finally release. [...] Happy Vimming! Subversion mirror maintainer, Edward L. Fox --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
Hi, Solaris 9 + SunStudio 12 seems to work fine. Just single nit: ./configure says checking sys/ptem.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence Reason is that sys/ptem.h needs sys/stream.h being included first ( I found it documented here http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/html_node/Header-Portability.html ) It seems to go away when I modify the configure.in like this, but I'm not autoconf expert ...: --- vim72a/src/configure.in út črn 24 12:01:39 2008 +++ vim72ax/src/configure.inst črn 25 08:56:18 2008 @@ -2071,10 +2071,14 @@ termcap.h fcntl.h sgtty.h sys/ioctl.h sys/time.h sys/types.h termio.h \ iconv.h langinfo.h math.h unistd.h stropts.h errno.h \ sys/resource.h sys/systeminfo.h locale.h \ - sys/stream.h sys/ptem.h termios.h libc.h sys/statfs.h \ + sys/stream.h termios.h libc.h sys/statfs.h \ poll.h sys/poll.h pwd.h utime.h sys/param.h libintl.h \ libgen.h util/debug.h util/msg18n.h frame.h \ sys/acl.h sys/access.h sys/sysctl.h sys/sysinfo.h wchar.h wctype.h) +AC_CHECK_HEADERS([sys/ptem.h], [], [], +[#if defined(sun) +# include sys/stream.h +#endif]) Cheers ! -- Vlad pgprTZjSSNAic.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
I have done a successful compile, build, run and 'make test' on: [...] Oh, didn't know that there's make test :) When I run it, I can see == make test === make[2]: Leaving directory `/share/chroot/on81/tmp/vim72a/src' if test -n -a -f po/Makefile; then \ cd po; make -f Makefile check VIM=../vim; \ fi if test vim != vim -a ! -e vim; then \ ln -s vim vim; \ fi /bin/sh: test: argument expected make[1]: [test] Error 1 (ignored) Thing is that -e is not supported by /bin/sh on Solaris. I would suggest replacing '-e' by '-x'. Cheers -- Vlad pgpveDXkAkSn7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Vladimir Marek wrote: I have done a successful compile, build, run and 'make test' on: [...] Oh, didn't know that there's make test :) When I run it, I can see == make test === make[2]: Leaving directory `/share/chroot/on81/tmp/vim72a/src' if test -n -a -f po/Makefile; then \ cd po; make -f Makefile check VIM=../vim; \ fi if test vim != vim -a ! -e vim; then \ ln -s vim vim; \ fi /bin/sh: test: argument expected make[1]: [test] Error 1 (ignored) I don't get that on Solaris 9 sparc. I'm using GNU make, don't know if that makes a difference to you. GNU Make 3.81 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. This program built for sparc-sun-solaris2.9 Thing is that -e is not supported by /bin/sh on Solaris. I would suggest replacing '-e' by '-x'. Cheers -- Vlad Hugh --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
== make test === make[2]: Leaving directory `/share/chroot/on81/tmp/vim72a/src' if test -n -a -f po/Makefile; then \ cd po; make -f Makefile check VIM=../vim; \ fi if test vim != vim -a ! -e vim; then \ ln -s vim vim; \ fi /bin/sh: test: argument expected make[1]: [test] Error 1 (ignored) I don't get that on Solaris 9 sparc. I'm using GNU make, don't know if that makes a difference to you. The make itself won't be difference, the shell used by the make program is. $ /bin/sh -c '[ -e /bin/ls ] echo exists' /bin/sh: test: argument expected $ /bin/bash -c '[ -e /bin/ls ] echo exists' exists $ /bin/ksh -c '[ -e /bin/ls ] echo exists' exists mine src/Makefile contains SHELL = /bin/sh What does yours ? -- Vlad pgpnvUaHBcZxw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
I've messed this up. I *do* get the test statement to fail, but it carries on anyway, because of the leading - sign. I've done this: brains hgs 29 % rcsdiff -u !$ rcsdiff -u Makefile === RCS file: Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 Makefile --- /tmp/T083aiz6 Wed Jun 25 12:19:34 2008 +++ MakefileWed Jun 25 12:19:29 2008 @@ -1742,6 +1742,7 @@ -if test -n $(MAKEMO) -a -f $(PODIR)/Makefile; then \ cd $(PODIR); $(MAKE) -f Makefile check VIM=../$(VIMTARGET); \ fi + -echo YIKES: NON-SOLARIS TEST NEXT -if test $(VIMTARGET) != vim -a ! -e vim; then \ ln -s $(VIMTARGET) vim; \ fi brains hgs 30 % cd .. brains hgs 31 % gmake check which helped me find: link.sh: Linked fine with a few libraries removed gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/export/home/Scratch/hgs/vim72a/src' if test -n -a -f po/Makefile; then \ cd po; gmake -f Makefile check VIM=../vim; \ fi echo YIKES: NON-SOLARIS TEST NEXT YIKES: NON-SOLARIS TEST NEXT if test vim != vim -a ! -e vim; then \ ln -s vim vim; \ fi /bin/sh: test: argument expected gmake[1]: [test] Error 1 (ignored) cd testdir; gmake -f Makefile gui VIMPROG=../vim so I've reproduced this. I can't find a GNU autoconf macro to test for test, preferring a GNU version. That would usually work. I found this: http://www.koders.com/noncode/fid1C9AA0D12BF4232D7ED2DE50745B7AB78FC8F839.aspx but AC_PROG_TEST depends on AC_PATH_PROG_VERIFY, which depends on the existence of a working test. I'm at the limits of how I can help now. Furthermore, I've confirmed your other results below.: On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Vladimir Marek wrote: == make test === [...] if test vim != vim -a ! -e vim; then \ ln -s vim vim; \ fi /bin/sh: test: argument expected make[1]: [test] Error 1 (ignored) I don't get that on Solaris 9 sparc. I'm using GNU make, don't know if that makes a difference to you. The make itself won't be difference, the shell used by the make program is. Yes, I thought it would pick bash, but it seems not. $ /bin/sh -c '[ -e /bin/ls ] echo exists' /bin/sh: test: argument expected /bin/sh: test: argument expected $ /bin/bash -c '[ -e /bin/ls ] echo exists' exists exists $ /bin/ksh -c '[ -e /bin/ls ] echo exists' exists exists OK, all the same as yours. What's happening here? mine src/Makefile contains SHELL = /bin/sh Same as yours. I definitely don't see the message you got. I could post you a Typescript file, but it's big, and not very entertaining. I get ALL TESTS DONE, with no complaints about errors. What does yours ? -- Vlad Hugh --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
I've messed this up. I *do* get the test statement to fail, but it carries on anyway, because of the leading - sign. I've done this: Ah, I never said that the test fails, but looking at my previous message I have to admit that it sounds so. [...] I can't find a GNU autoconf macro to test for test, preferring a GNU version. That would usually work. I found this: I do not think it's necessary. '-e' tests if file exits, but this option is not supported by solaris /bin/sh (but it is supported by ksh and bash). I suggested using '-x' instead, which tests if file exists and is executable, and which is supported even by /bin/sh. $ /bin/sh -c '[ -e /bin/ls ] echo exists' /bin/sh: test: argument expected $ /bin/bash -c '[ -e /bin/ls ] echo exists' exists $ /bin/ksh -c '[ -e /bin/ls ] echo exists' exists OK, all the same as yours. What's happening here? From the solaris man page === test(1) ... -e file True if file exists. (Not avail- able in sh.) ... I just suggest changing '-x' for '-e'. But the tests are running fine even without this change. Sorry for the confusion. -- Vlad pgpI5ucDCrxMY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Vladimir Marek wrote: I've messed this up. I *do* get the test statement to fail, but it carries on anyway, because of the leading - sign. I've done this: Ah, I never said that the test fails, but looking at my previous message I have to admit that it sounds so. No, you didn't say that, but when I looked back through the output I couldn't find the failure among the skipped errors. [...] I can't find a GNU autoconf macro to test for test, preferring a GNU version. That would usually work. I found this: I do not think it's necessary. '-e' tests if file exits, but this option You're right: that's a shell function. Sorry. is not supported by solaris /bin/sh (but it is supported by ksh and bash). I suggested using '-x' instead, which tests if file exists and is executable, and which is supported even by /bin/sh. $ /bin/sh -c '[ -e /bin/ls ] echo exists' /bin/sh: test: argument expected $ /bin/bash -c '[ -e /bin/ls ] echo exists' exists $ /bin/ksh -c '[ -e /bin/ls ] echo exists' exists OK, all the same as yours. What's happening here? From the solaris man page === test(1) ... -e file True if file exists. (Not avail- able in sh.) ... Sorry, I understand now what is happening, but wrote that bit before I realised that I'd failed to see the problem in my output. [Then I had to go for lunch or they'd run out again, so left too hastily. I wanted to let you know I'd replicated your problem anyway.] I just suggest changing '-x' for '-e'. But the tests are running fine even without this change. I'm testing if the problem disappears if the whole operation is run under /bin/ksh in the first place... No. Starting from ./configure under /bin/ksh doesn't fix this. That's not my login shell though. Indeed, $SHELL is still set to /bin/tcsh. So I `export SHELL=/bin/ksh` and rebuild test. No, the src/Makefile doesn't get rewritten, so the bug is still there. I think your fix is the only course of action, with the experience I have. By the way, which version of Solaris are you on? Just wondering how long this will persist. Sorry for the confusion. All the confusion was my fault, not seeing it, and failing to edit out What's happening here? -- Vlad Thank you, Hugh --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Vladimir Marek wrote: [...] Makefiles are not generated, as you noted. [...] By the way, which version of Solaris are you on? Just wondering how long this will persist. Solaris 9 and also latest development. It will persist, noone dares to touch old /bin/sh because of compatibility :) Good point. I suggest you submit a patch to Bram. I'd do this for you, especially as it's small, but you should get the credit for the fix. -- Vlad Hugh --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
Patrick Texier wrote: On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:38:14 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: MS-WINDOWS one-size-fits-all: pc/gvim72a.exe self-installing, includes all runtime files gvim.exe doesn't run on Windows 98 (Second Edition 4.10..A French): I have an alert box Program start error: c:\vim\vim72a\gvim.exe file needs an Windows newer version. Update your Windows version. I will compile it. Bummer. I intended to this self-installing executable to run on all MS-Windows systems. Windows 98 should be OK (with some service packs added). I switched to the Visual C++ 2008 express version. Mainly because it's the simplest to use. But if it locks out Windows 98 users that's a bit of a problem. Not sure if it's possible to go back to the 2003 or 2005 version now (they are downloads). George, is this a matter of compilation flags, or is the C++ 2008 version not able to build for Windows 98? Or is this a matter of building with an older set of SDK files? I also updated the NSIS installer, but I don't think that is relevant. -- From know your smileys: *|:-) Santa Claus (Ho Ho Ho) /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ ///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org/// \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org/// --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing - patch attached
Good point. I suggest you submit a patch to Bram. I'd do this for you, especially as it's small, but you should get the credit for the fix. Well, I thought that single letter change would not require diff, but I'm happy to attach one :) Thanks -- Vlad --- Makefile.orig st črn 25 18:24:12 2008 +++ Makefilest črn 25 18:24:15 2008 @@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ -if test -n $(MAKEMO) -a -f $(PODIR)/Makefile; then \ cd $(PODIR); $(MAKE) -f Makefile check VIM=../$(VIMTARGET); \ fi - -if test $(VIMTARGET) != vim -a ! -e vim; then \ + -if test $(VIMTARGET) != vim -a ! -x vim; then \ ln -s $(VIMTARGET) vim; \ fi cd testdir; $(MAKE) -f Makefile $(GUI_TESTTARGET) VIMPROG=../$(VIMTARGET) $(GUI_TESTARG) pgpcuJnEldgUg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
On 25/06/08 13:48, Hugh Sasse wrote: I've messed this up. I *do* get the test statement to fail, but it carries on anyway, because of the leading - sign. I've done this: brains hgs 29 % rcsdiff -u !$ rcsdiff -u Makefile === RCS file: Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 Makefile --- /tmp/T083aiz6 Wed Jun 25 12:19:34 2008 +++ MakefileWed Jun 25 12:19:29 2008 @@ -1742,6 +1742,7 @@ -if test -n $(MAKEMO) -a -f $(PODIR)/Makefile; then \ cd $(PODIR); $(MAKE) -f Makefile check VIM=../$(VIMTARGET); \ fi + -echo YIKES: NON-SOLARIS TEST NEXT -if test $(VIMTARGET) != vim -a ! -e vim; then \ ln -s $(VIMTARGET) vim; \ fi brains hgs 30 % cd .. brains hgs 31 % gmake check which helped me find: link.sh: Linked fine with a few libraries removed gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/export/home/Scratch/hgs/vim72a/src' if test -n -a -f po/Makefile; then \ cd po; gmake -f Makefile check VIM=../vim; \ fi echo YIKES: NON-SOLARIS TEST NEXT YIKES: NON-SOLARIS TEST NEXT if test vim != vim -a ! -e vim; then \ ln -s vim vim; \ fi /bin/sh: test: argument expected gmake[1]: [test] Error 1 (ignored) cd testdir; gmake -f Makefile gui VIMPROG=../vim so I've reproduced this. I can't find a GNU autoconf macro to test for test, preferring a GNU version. That would usually work. I found this: Have you got a bash binary on your system? If you do, you can use it instead of sh and the error will (I think) go away. I suppose it is related with the long discussion we had recently in another thread about the syntax colouring of shell scripts (and in particular, sh vs. bash vs. ksh vs. POSIX). (When invoked with the name sh, bash will behave almost the way sh used to. The clinch is tn the almost.) Best regards, Tony. -- The only really decent thing to do behind a person's back is pat it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing - patch attached
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:25:31PM +0200, Vladimir Marek wrote: Good point. I suggest you submit a patch to Bram. I'd do this for you, especially as it's small, but you should get the credit for the fix. Well, I thought that single letter change would not require diff, but I'm happy to attach one :) I find it interesting that this problematic sh doesn't support -x (which is required by SUS) but supports -a/-o which are XSI extensions[0]. In the interest of portability, changing from test ... -a ... to test ... test ... would be better. [0] - http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/test.html -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing - patch attached
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 01:25:00PM -0400, James Vega wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:25:31PM +0200, Vladimir Marek wrote: Good point. I suggest you submit a patch to Bram. I'd do this for you, especially as it's small, but you should get the credit for the fix. Well, I thought that single letter change would not require diff, but I'm happy to attach one :) I find it interesting that this problematic sh doesn't support -x (which And by -x I mean -e. :) -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
Dnia Wednesday 25 of June 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisał: Hello Vim users, Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA Compiles, Tests ALL DONE, runs fine on Mandriva 2008.0, GTK2, Huge. m. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
RE: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
John Beckett wrote: Bram Moolenaar wrote: Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA I have done a successful compile, build, run and 'make test' on: - Windows XP - Fedora 8 Linux test11.in has: Note: This test will fail if gzip is not available. test30.in perhaps should say: Note: This test will fail if cat is not available. With these two provisos, all the tests run on Windows. I'll add a note to test30.in. -- From know your smileys: +(:-) The Pope /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ ///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org/// \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org/// --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
Vladimir Marek wrote: Solaris 9 + SunStudio 12 seems to work fine. Just single nit: ./configure says checking sys/ptem.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence Reason is that sys/ptem.h needs sys/stream.h being included first ( I found it documented here http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/html_node/Header-Portability.html ) It seems to go away when I modify the configure.in like this, but I'm not autoconf expert ...: --- vim72a/src/configure.in út črn 24 12:01:39 2008 +++ vim72ax/src/configure.inst črn 25 08:56:18 2008 @@ -2071,10 +2071,14 @@ termcap.h fcntl.h sgtty.h sys/ioctl.h sys/time.h sys/types.h termio.h \ iconv.h langinfo.h math.h unistd.h stropts.h errno.h \ sys/resource.h sys/systeminfo.h locale.h \ - sys/stream.h sys/ptem.h termios.h libc.h sys/statfs.h \ + sys/stream.h termios.h libc.h sys/statfs.h \ poll.h sys/poll.h pwd.h utime.h sys/param.h libintl.h \ libgen.h util/debug.h util/msg18n.h frame.h \ sys/acl.h sys/access.h sys/sysctl.h sys/sysinfo.h wchar.h wctype.h) +AC_CHECK_HEADERS([sys/ptem.h], [], [], +[#if defined(sun) +# include sys/stream.h +#endif]) Looks almost OK. This should be slightly better: dnl sys/ptem.h depends on sys/stream.h on Solaris 9 AC_CHECK_HEADERS(sys/ptem.h, [], [], [#if defined HAVE_SYS_STREAM_H # include sys/stream.h #endif]) -- From know your smileys: :-) Bishop /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ ///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org/// \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org/// --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
2008/6/25 Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Patrick Texier wrote: On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:38:14 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: MS-WINDOWS one-size-fits-all: pc/gvim72a.exe self-installing, includes all runtime files gvim.exe doesn't run on Windows 98 (Second Edition 4.10..A French): I have an alert box Program start error: c:\vim\vim72a\gvim.exe file needs an Windows newer version. Update your Windows version. I will compile it. Bummer. I intended to this self-installing executable to run on all MS-Windows systems. Windows 98 should be OK (with some service packs added). I switched to the Visual C++ 2008 express version. Mainly because it's the simplest to use. But if it locks out Windows 98 users that's a bit of a problem. Not sure if it's possible to go back to the 2003 or 2005 version now (they are downloads). George, is this a matter of compilation flags, or is the C++ 2008 version not able to build for Windows 98? Or is this a matter of building with an older set of SDK files? Don't know. It's probably something to do with the C runtime. It may be possible to add some additional compile-time flags. I have a number of virtual machine images at home with all the different flavors of VC from VC98 onwards. I'll play around with them tonight on my newly resuscitated Win64 box. (Not sure if I still have a Win9x CD so that I can make a Win9x virtual machine.) I also updated the NSIS installer, but I don't think that is relevant. Speaking of which, how do you actually build gvim72a.exe? I tried to build a Vim installer several months ago and gave up in complete frustration. My guess was that you had some additional build scripts which weren't in the SVN archive. -- /George V. Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.georgevreilly.com/blog http://blogs.cozi.com/tech --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Bill McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed 25-Jun-08 2:05am -0600, Edward L. Fox wrote: [...] svn co https://vim.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/branches/vim7.2/ In the top level of your checking-out directory to switch to 7.2 branch. Note: https://vim.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/vim7 will still point to the 7.1 branch until 7.2 is finally release. Edward, I'm a little confused with your terminology - top level of your checking out directory. Sorry, my bad... I was a bit tired at that time and I wrote a wrong command in my mail... There should be: svn switch https://vim.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/branches/vim7.2/ I'm running on WinXP. The top level of my vim directory is: Directory of C:\vim\* 6/24/2008 22:59 DIR backup 6/22/2008 23:39 DIR vim-fp 7/31/2007 11:18 DIR vim70 6/22/2008 22:34 DIR vim71 5/11/2008 23:25 DIR vim71_svn 6/24/2008 22:53 DIR vim72a 6/24/2008 21:45 DIR vimfiles The top level of my vim svn directory is: Directory of C:\vim\vim71_svn\* 9/09/2007 12:03 DIR farsi 9/09/2007 12:03 DIR libs 9/09/2007 12:03 DIR nsis 9/09/2007 12:01 DIR pixmaps 6/06/2008 8:45 DIR runtime 6/21/2008 23:28 DIR src I believe I initially obtained my current SVN download by: cdd c:\vim svn co https://vim.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/branches/vim7.1/ vim71_svn I think I would do about the same thing for 7.2: cdd c:\vim svn co https://vim.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/branches/vim7.2/ vim72_svn Does that appear correct? Yes, it's correct. But you just checked out a brand new directory. I meant to provide the method to simply switch the existing local directory to the latest branch rather than check out another directory. Running the command above will do that. Also I have an alias to update my files. My current alias, say sv71, does: pushd c:\vim\vim71_svn svn up svn log --limit 1 popd I should now create another alias, say sv72, that does: pushd c:\vim\vim72_svn svn up svn log --limit 1 popd This way, I should be able to update vim71_svn with 'sv71' and update vim72_svn with 'sv72'. Does that also appear correct? Vim71 will no longer be updated. So you don't need to keep the alias for it. -- Best regards, Bill --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA compiled successfully with uclibc-0.9.29 + gtk-1.2.10 on DetaolB. Test results: ALL DONE nice work! Thanks! -- Christian -- http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/, a linux distribution for Qemu with Git inside ! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Vim version 7.2a ready for BETA testing
On 24/06/08 22:38, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Hello Vim users, Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA This is a BETA release of Vim 7.2. It consists of Vim 7.1 plus all patches, updated runtime files and some more. I expect this to be reasonable stable, since most of the patches have been used by many people already. However, I did include several patches the last few days, this might break something. Please report every problem you find! The time until a 7.2 release depends on how many problems are reported. The biggest addition is floating support. Once you have installed Vim 7.2a BETA you can find details about the changes since Vim 7.1 with :help version-7.2. Testing --- This is a BETA test version. Please give it a good test and report anything that isn't right. That includes a crash but also a typo in the documentation. I will not make an Amiga or OS/2 binary for Vim 7.2a. A Mac version is hopefully available soon on http://macvim.org/ and/or from the MacVim project at http://code.google.com/p/macvim/ [...] I've reached the end of configure and gcc is busy churning out its objects. I notice there has been a number of small changes in the configure script, and (at least) one argument has changed name: --with-tcl= has become --with-tclsh= which is more logical but requires changing your configure arguments if you use that one. (I'm not sure but I think it may be possible to omit this parameter altogether if your tclsh is at a more or less standard location.) Best regards, Tony. -- Beware of self-styled experts: an ex is a has-been, and a spurt is a drip under pressure. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
