[Vo]:Chu's reaction on change.gov

2009-01-16 Thread Michel Jullian
See video on 
http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/hl_citizens_briefing_book_dr._steven_chu_reacts/

Interesting insights on various energy issues, but no mention of CF.

Michel



Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia blacklists LENR-CANR.org

2009-01-16 Thread Terry Blanton
Piki?

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:55 PM, R C Macaulay walha...@cvtv.net wrote:
 Howdy Jed,

 At some point in time an awareness arrives that Wiki is a closed society
 website disguised as an open forum and posting  information source.
 Like the joke about inspectors.. one can argue with an inspector.. but like
 wrestling with a pig in the mud.. sooner or later.. it dawns on you.. the
 pig loves it.
 Or debating the merits of the stock market swings. One's gambling blood
 screams the market is ripe for recovery and get rich profits... while ..
 one's intuition screams the market is made for television. Perhaps the huge
 rush across the world to put loads of cash into T bills that pay zero
 interest is talking the loudest and screaming the Dow will drop to 2000. If
 this scope of drop happens, I can take a page outa my grandma's book, when
 she papered her bathroom wall with GM stock in 1919 and steamed it off in
 1944.

 Speaking of pigs, the Dime Box Saloon downright absurd and drunken  ideas
 society is thinking of starting a website to compete with Wiki but we
 haven't come up with a name for it. Any chance you have an insider at Wiki
 that could help us ?
 Richard



Re: [Vo]:grand plan for electric cars in ontario

2009-01-16 Thread R C Macaulay
Howdy Harry,

Electric cars sure make sense. When I was a kid  there were still a few around. 
Almost trouble free performance.
BUT.. we had a surplus of electric generating capacity.. TODAY we are bumping 
our head on the ceiling of capacity. This summer should give us a real shock 
across the USA with brownouts. 

This poses the question.. IF electric power shortages begin to become serious 
this year... AND.. Nuke plants take min of 9 years to build.. and BO willl tax 
coal plants outa business.. and gas turbine plants are too expensive to 
compete..
Where the heck are we gonna get the electric power to re-charge the 
electro-cars?
Richard

Re: [Vo]:grand plan for electric cars in ontario

2009-01-16 Thread Jed Rothwell

R C Macaulay wrote:

BUT.. we had a surplus of electric generating capacity.. TODAY we 
are bumping our head on the ceiling of capacity. This summer should 
give us a real shock across the USA with brownouts.


This is not a problem. Most electric cars will be in use during the 
day, and they will be recharged overnight, when there is tremendous 
unused generator capacity.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Important: NASA hacker Gary McKinnon

2009-01-16 Thread OrionWorks
From  Remi Cornwall:

 Dear Vortex,

 I unsubscribed in the past because I simply disagreed with many of the
 opinions and science that goes on here, to me there is no point in arguing
 anymore.

 I would like to use some of the 'cache' I have in Vortex to ask British
 citizens to lobby their MPs/home secretary/Euro MPs in their own words (and
 with their own postcodes/emails to avoid being SPAM-handled) on the matter
 of Gary McKinnon.

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7831481.stm

 http://freegary.org.uk/

 This is the story of a British man being crushed by the USA for 'hacking'
 into their unprotected computers and allegedly finding stuff about 'UFOs'.
 He did no criminal damage, made no real risk to national security.

 All he has done is commit the misdemeanour of trespass and this is not a
 felony warranting 70 years in a US maximum security jail.

 It is cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by the American constitution
 anyway.

 One should fear that US law can usurp British and European independence.

 Remi.

 This is my letter, please use your own words.

 To:

 Home Secretary
 Rt Hon. Jacqui Smith MP
 c/o Direct Communications Unit
 Home Office
 2 Marsham Street
 London SW1P 4DF

 On reading the BBC news item about Gary McKinnon and taking the suggestion
 of his support campaign I write to you as follows:

 Gary McKinnon has committed no felony. He has caused no criminal damage. He
 has not threatened national security.

 He has merely trespassed and it is a misdemeanour.

 His sentence bears no relation to this misdemeanour. We see child abusers,
 murderers, rapists get off with trivial sentences of a few years or other
 legal technicalities.

 Under the USA constitution his punishment is cruel and unusual and thus is
 unconstitutional.

 70 years in a maximum security prison bears no relation to the offence.

 This disproportionate crushing of Gary must show that they have a conspiracy
 to hide.

 I also object to the usurping of British justice by the USA. The
 misdemeanour was committed on British soil so he is subject to British Laws.

 Gary was and still is a man of exemplary character.

 Please support:

 Early Day Motion 2388 sponsored by David Burrowes MP

 I support Gary.

 Remi Cornwall.

I would concur with Remi's assessment. I'm not in a position to
assess, nor agree or disagree with what Gary presumed to have
uncovered while he was hacking into certain USA government web sites.
If Gary uncovered anything of interest, perhaps it it may have been
more of an embarrassment rather than exploiting actual national
security issues.

Below is a link to an on-line video interview of Gary conducted back
in 2006 by Project Camelot.

http://www.projectcamelot.net/gary_mckinnon.html

Excerpt from web page link:



Gary McKinnon : Hacking the Pentagon

London, June 2006

I (Kerry Cassidy) caught up with Gary McKinnon in North London on my
way back from safari in Kenya. The interview was shot using a
hand-held camcorder and uploaded at 4 am UK time, making use of a
wireless connection outside of an office building in downtown
Birmingham. This is what is known as guerilla filmmaking...

We sat in the back of his local pub, in a garden in the late
afternoon. Gary is lucid, eloquent and extremely intelligent. He made
it clear that the real reason the Americans want to extradite him is
not for any damage he has done, for in fact there wasn't any. They are
pursuing him is because of what he might have seen. Specifically,
documents revealing a list of Non-terrestrial officers and off-world
cargo operations somewhere out in space, hinting at the real
possibility of military activities taking place in relation to other
planets.

Such a possibility has got to be mind-blowing to the average person
who barely grasps that there might actually be aliens from other
worlds interacting with earth and governments in the vicinity of our
solar system. Key to the whole extradition matter is the issue that
there were NO passwords required in order to access this material...
and that a relatively unprofessional hacker, self-taught albeit
brilliant, would be able, using a dial-up modem, to gain top secret
access to NASA files and places as sacrosanct as the Pentagon.

**

Stargate Atlantis, Here we go again!!! ;-)

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia blacklists LENR-CANR.org

2009-01-16 Thread OrionWorks
Terry sez:

 Piki?

I must confess that I use Wiki (Oink-Oink-Piki!) a lot. It's a quik
invaluable informational resource for NON CONTROVERSIAL subjects.

It should be obvious to anyone by now that relying on Wiki for
information on issues possessing a modicum of controversy is
indicative of lazy ignorance.

What's the status of Knol? Last I herd it wasn't fairing too well.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



[VO]: Fire Vortex

2009-01-16 Thread R C Macaulay
Howdy Vorts,
It is difficult to estimate the speed of the visible fire cone as it 
accelerates upward.. but.. momentary bursts indicate an unbelievable 
acceleration is attained.
Richard



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_whirl

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Fw1qiAld2Ufeature=related



Re: [VO]: Fire Vortex

2009-01-16 Thread OrionWorks
Richard sez:

 Howdy Vorts,
 It is difficult to estimate the speed of the visible fire cone as it
 accelerates upward.. but.. momentary bursts indicate an unbelievable
 acceleration is attained.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_whirl

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Fw1qiAld2Ufeature=related

And Moses beheld a column of fire.

I wonder what were the missing five commandments - from the original
15 commandments.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:grand plan for electric cars in ontario

2009-01-16 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:45 AM, R C Macaulay walha...@cvtv.net wrote:

 Where the heck are we gonna get the electric power to re-charge the
 electro-cars?

At night, wholesale power is free due to excess capacity as Jed points out.

During the day, we will do like the Fed, and simply print power:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-9972306-54.html

Terry



Re: [Vo]:grand plan for electric cars in ontario

2009-01-16 Thread Terry Blanton
But so far, electric car manufacturers have been a disappointment:

http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/13/electric-cars-disappointed-in-2008-and-2009-wont-be-different/

Terry

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Harry Veeder hvee...@ncf.ca wrote:
 Grand plan for electric cars takes shape in Ontario

 Last Updated: Thursday, January 15, 2009 | 12:45 PM ET
 Comments129Recommend83

 CBC News

 A U.S. company that promotes infrastructure to support electric cars is
 going to open a site in Toronto to demonstrate the vehicles, Shai Agassi,
 founder and CEO of Better Place, said Thursday.

 He called the joint announcement with the provincial government the
 all-important first step in an expected electric car charging network
 rollout for Canada.

 Ontario is supporting the plan by studying ways to speed up the introduction
 of electric cars to the province, said Premier Dalton McGuinty. The study is
 scheduled for release in May.

 It will look at financial incentives to encourage drivers to buy electric
 vehicles, giving such cars preferred access to the transportation grid,
 having the government buy electric vehicles and promoting them...

 http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2009/01/15/ontario-electric.html



[Vo]:Change.gov submission now at 360

2009-01-16 Thread Jed Rothwell

To reiterate, my submission to the Citizen's Briefing Book is here:

http://citizensbriefingbook.change.gov/ideas/viewIdea.apexp?id=08780004qPn

It is now at 360 votes (36 people). Earlier it was at 370 but someone 
voted against it. If the skeptics hear about it, they will send it to 
negative territory.


The additional votes have made it somewhat more likely to attract 
attention. Overall votes for the top 200 submissions have increased 
about 45% since yesterday, whereas this one has increased 125%. 
Yesterday it was about 1000 from the top; today it is roughly 600 from the top.


Several well-known researchers have added comments, which I think 
enhances the credibility of the message.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Change.gov submission now at 360

2009-01-16 Thread Jed Rothwell

As of 14:00 it has dropped to 350.

If people do not vote for this it will submerge.

It is a shame this web site does not show all votes pro and con.

You have to wonder what sort of person opposes academic freedom so 
much they vote against this:


Senior researchers at National Laboratories, the U. S. Navy and 
other government laboratories have done outstanding cold fusion 
research in the past, and they would like to do more, but they have 
not been adequately funded.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Change.gov submission now at 360

2009-01-16 Thread MJ

I'm not sure, but it seems that fake IDs can vote too.

Mark Jordan


On 16 Jan 2009 at 14:02, Jed Rothwell wrote:

 As of 14:00 it has dropped to 350.
 
 If people do not vote for this it will submerge.
 
 It is a shame this web site does not show all votes pro and con.
 
 You have to wonder what sort of person opposes academic freedom so 
 much they vote against this:
 
 Senior researchers at National Laboratories, the U. S. Navy and 
 other government laboratories have done outstanding cold fusion 
 research in the past, and they would like to do more, but they have 
 not been adequately funded.
 
 - Jed
 




Re: [Vo]:Change.gov submission now at 360

2009-01-16 Thread Jed Rothwell

MJ wrote:


I'm not sure, but it seems that fake IDs can vote too.


Yes, I am sure they can. That would be called sock puppet voting, I believe.

I wouldn't countenance it but I also wouldn't put it past the skeptics!

This is one of the reasons I do not take this website very seriously. 
Another reason is that the first proposals uploaded got a large, 
unfair advantage. They should an option to mix them up and display 
them in random order for voting.


- Jed



[Vo]:Detecting the Holographic Blurriness of Space-Time

2009-01-16 Thread Terry Blanton
Our World Might be a Giant Hologram

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126911.300-our-world-may-be-a-giant-hologram.html

DRIVING through the countryside south of Hanover, it would be easy to
miss the GEO600 experiment. From the outside, it doesn't look much: in
the corner of a field stands an assortment of boxy temporary
buildings, from which two long trenches emerge, at a right angle to
each other, covered with corrugated iron. Underneath the metal sheets,
however, lies a detector that stretches for 600 metres.

For the past seven years, this German set-up has been looking for
gravitational waves - ripples in space-time thrown off by super-dense
astronomical objects such as neutron stars and black holes. GEO600 has
not detected any gravitational waves so far, but it might
inadvertently have made the most important discovery in physics for
half a century.

For many months, the GEO600 team-members had been scratching their
heads over inexplicable noise that is plaguing their giant detector.
Then, out of the blue, a researcher approached them with an
explanation. In fact, he had even predicted the noise before he knew
they were detecting it. According to Craig Hogan, a physicist at the
Fermilab particle physics lab in Batavia, Illinois, GEO600 has
stumbled upon the fundamental limit of space-time - the point where
space-time stops behaving like the smooth continuum Einstein described
and instead dissolves into grains, just as a newspaper photograph
dissolves into dots as you zoom in. It looks like GEO600 is being
buffeted by the microscopic quantum convulsions of space-time, says
Hogan.

If this doesn't blow your socks off, then Hogan, who has just been
appointed director of Fermilab's Center for Particle Astrophysics, has
an even bigger shock in store: If the GEO600 result is what I suspect
it is, then we are all living in a giant cosmic hologram.

more



Re: [Vo]:Detecting the Holographic Blurriness of Space-Time

2009-01-16 Thread OrionWorks
Terry sez:

 Our World Might be a Giant Hologram

 http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126911.300-our-world-may-be-a-giant-hologram.html

 DRIVING through the countryside south of Hanover, it would be easy to
 miss the GEO600 experiment. From the outside, it doesn't look much: in
 the corner of a field stands an assortment of boxy temporary
 buildings, from which two long trenches emerge, at a right angle to
 each other, covered with corrugated iron. Underneath the metal sheets,
 however, lies a detector that stretches for 600 metres.

 For the past seven years, this German set-up has been looking for
 gravitational waves - ripples in space-time thrown off by super-dense
 astronomical objects such as neutron stars and black holes. GEO600 has
 not detected any gravitational waves so far, but it might
 inadvertently have made the most important discovery in physics for
 half a century.

 For many months, the GEO600 team-members had been scratching their
 heads over inexplicable noise that is plaguing their giant detector.
 Then, out of the blue, a researcher approached them with an
 explanation. In fact, he had even predicted the noise before he knew
 they were detecting it. According to Craig Hogan, a physicist at the
 Fermilab particle physics lab in Batavia, Illinois, GEO600 has
 stumbled upon the fundamental limit of space-time - the point where
 space-time stops behaving like the smooth continuum Einstein described
 and instead dissolves into grains, just as a newspaper photograph
 dissolves into dots as you zoom in. It looks like GEO600 is being
 buffeted by the microscopic quantum convulsions of space-time, says
 Hogan.

 If this doesn't blow your socks off, then Hogan, who has just been
 appointed director of Fermilab's Center for Particle Astrophysics, has
 an even bigger shock in store: If the GEO600 result is what I suspect
 it is, then we are all living in a giant cosmic hologram.

 more

Warning. You only have 60 seconds left to insert another quarter
before disconnection.

Make sure your mantra is current.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Change.gov submission now at 360

2009-01-16 Thread Jed Rothwell

At 16:00 score has struggled to reach a new high of 380.

I do not see any change in the traffic at LENR-CANR.org. You cannot 
put a direct link into Change.gov, but I have the website name in 
ordinary text, and Ludwik Kowalski added it as well.


There have been no negative comments, interestingly enough. Lots of 
helpful positive comments.


Thank you to all who have supported this initiative. You never know; 
it might do some good, and I don't see how it can do any harm.


- Jed



[Vo]:Change.gov data from midday today

2009-01-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
For those keeping score, here is my tally of the top 190 items at the 
Citizen's Briefing Book, taken around midday. The total number of 
entries in the Energy and Environment section was:


01/15/093200
01/16/093800

Score of top 190 entries (every tenth item):

57120
24200
16980
11440
8090
6150
4890
4160
3410
3040
2750
2360
2100
1980
1790
1680
1520
1420
1320
1270

This is where I determined that total votes have risen ~45% for the 
top items. The distribution is similar to what it was yesterday.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Detecting the Holographic Blurriness of Space-Time

2009-01-16 Thread Kyle Mcallister
 For many months, the GEO600 team-members had been
 scratching their
 heads over inexplicable noise that is plaguing their
 giant detector.

snip...

 Then, out of the blue, a researcher approached them
 with an
 explanation. In fact, he had even predicted the
 noise before he knew
 they were detecting it. 

snip prophecy in science...

 dissolves into dots as you zoom in. It looks like
 GEO600 is being
 buffeted by the microscopic quantum convulsions of
 space-time, says
 Hogan.

Is this why my shock absorbers are buffeted when I
drive down Niagara Falls Blvd.? Or is that just the
potholes?

 If this doesn't blow your socks off, then Hogan, who
 has just been
 appointed director of Fermilab's Center for Particle
 Astrophysics, has
 an even bigger shock in store: If the GEO600 result
 is what I suspect
 it is, then we are all living in a giant cosmic
 hologram.

Wow. We hear some noise between 300-1500cps, and that
means the universe is a hologram. Planck sized nougaty
bite-size bits on a pringle-shaped universe of some
kind. Can I get some quantum foam atop my Guiness?

There is something fascinating about science. One
gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such
a trifling investment of fact. -- Mark Twain

Cheers,
--Kyle


  



[VO]:Gas-deprived European nations

2009-01-16 Thread R C Macaulay

Howdy Vorts,
There is no substitute for getting a pitchfork in the rear to make one move it. 
  Russia can now hold Europe hostage at will with a gas pipeline. I suggest 
that Europe will begin to take solar and wind electric power generation a step 
ahead. The storage solution may be  to produce a form of hydrogen.
Human nature dictates that one sit on their rear until sum'buddy grabs the 
rocking chair out from under them. If Europe embarks on step in this direction, 
The USA will follow, lead or get outa the way
Richard

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28692207

[Vo]:Message posted to Wikipedia cold fusion discussion section

2009-01-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
The machinations of the skeptics at Wikipedia are hysterical.

- Jed

== Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell ==

I do not know if I am allowed to contribute here, but someone informed me
there is a surrealistic conversation underway here about me. So perhaps you
will allow me the liberty to straighten out a few things.

Several issues have been raised here, but perhaps the two most important
ones are:

1. Am I stealing papers without permission and uploading them LENR-CANR.org?

2. If I am not, how can I prove my innocence? (Conversely, if I am, how can
you prove I am guilty?)

I think it is easy to show that I am not stealing anything, and you can
confirm this independently without asking me for proof, and without
depending upon my word. I recommend the old fashioned, commonsense approach.
First, let's look at some evidence, including evidence you can find in a
bookstore or university library, off the internet, away from LENR-CANR,
where I could not have had a hand in creating it or faking it. Then, let us
draw some conclusions from this evidence. First:

There are a number of books in English and Japanese that mention
LENR-CANR.org, and include acknowledgments to me, as the operator of the
site and also as someone who helped write the book itself. See, for example,
the books about cold fusion by Beaudette, Storms, and A. C. Clarke
(Profiles of the Future Millennium Edition), Mizuno and Takahashi.

There are number of cold fusion papers in journals and conference
proceedings that include hyperlinks to papers at LENR-CANR.org. Several
papers mention me, in footnotes or acknowledgments. Two of the proceedings
list me as an editor.

Several of the proceedings list me in the back as a participant, and they
include me in the group photo.

So, what does this tell you? It tells you that the authors of these books
and papers are aware of LENR-CANR.org. It tells you they know who I am. They
know how to reach me. Anyone does: my e-mail address, phone number and
mailing address is on the front page at LENR-CANR.org. It is proof that
these authors have no objection to my uploading their papers. Some of them,
such as Miles and Storms, have their own web sites, with pointers to
LENR-CANR.org, so clearly they have no objection to the content there.

You can safely conclude that I am widely known to many researchers in the
field, and that if I were uploading papers without the author and
publisher's permission, they would quickly hear about it. They would know
where to find me, and they would tell me to stop.

You can also independently confirm, by various methods, that people download
thousands of papers per week from LENR-CANR.org, as shown in our News
section.

In other words, I am not uploading papers secretly, without anyone noticing.
If I were doing it illicitly, without permission, I would soon be caught. It
is also obvious that I have the cooperation of authors and publishers,
because I have several original manuscripts in Word format converted to
Acrobat. (Not the final journal format.) Obviously, I could only have
acquired them from the authors themselves, and it is not likely that I am a
cat burglar or master Internet hacker who has acquired them without
permission.

In point of fact I have more than a thousand other papers in scanned format
plus a few thousand others on paper that authors and publishers have NOT
granted me permission to upload, and thus are not available at
LENR-CANR.org. You can see the list of them. Several of these are critically
important to the field and it is shame I cannot present them.

Let me address one other issue that has arisen here, which is: How do you
know that the copies of the papers at LENR-CANR.org are correct? How do you
know I am not changing the content, as at least one person here alleges?
This sort of question would only be asked by someone who is totally
dependent on the Internet and never knew the world as it was before 1995.
You can confirm the accuracy of my copies by comparing them to other copies
in libraries. All of the journal papers at LENR-CANR.org came from the
libraries Los Alamos, Georgia Tech., the University of Utah and Aarhus Univ,
and the proceedings were published by the Italian Physical Soc. and other
organizations listed at LENR-CANR.org. So anyone who wants can read original
sources and find out whether I have copied them correctly or not. And by the
way, if you find I have not copied one correctly because of an OCR error for
example, or because I have preprint manuscript from the author, please let
me know.

That also applies to the official documents published by the DoE that people
here accuse me of faking or changing, such as the ERAB report. Did it not
occur to these people to go to the DoE, get the original document, and
compare it to my version? Did they imagine I am betting that no one,
anywhere, will have enough sense to do that? Such accusations are
mind-boggling. Anyone with an ounce of sense can catch me or prove 

[Vo]:OT:The Black Hole

2009-01-16 Thread Harry Veeder

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=P5_Msrdg3Hk
;-)
Harry




Re: [VO]:Gas-deprived European nations

2009-01-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
R C Macaulay wrote:


 There is no substitute for getting a pitchfork in the rear to make one move
 it.   Russia can now hold Europe hostage at will with a gas pipeline. I
 suggest that Europe will begin to take solar and wind electric power
 generation a step ahead.


Good point! I had not thought of it, but Putin may be the best friend
alternative energy has. Better than Al Gore, by gum.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Detecting the Holographic Blurriness of Space-Time

2009-01-16 Thread thomas malloy

Kyle McAllister wrote:


For many months, the GEO600 team-members had been scratching their heads over 
inexplicable noise that is plaguing their
giant detector.

snip...Then, out of the blue, a researcher approached them with an
explanation. In fact, he had even predicted the noise before he knew
they were detecting it. 


snip prophecy in science...
dissolves into dots as you zoom in. It looks like GEO600 is being
buffeted by the microscopic quantum convulsions of space-time, says
Hogan.
   



Is this why my shock absorbers are buffeted when I drive down Niagara Falls 
Blvd.? Or is that just the potholes?
 


No, but I think that it is related to quantum vacuum fluxiations.


If this doesn't blow your socks off, then Hogan, who has just been
appointed director of Fermilab's Center for Particle Astrophysics, has
an even bigger shock in store: If the GEO600 result is what I suspect it is, then 
we are all living in a giant cosmic hologram.
   



Wow. We hear some noise between 300-1500cps, and thatn means the universe is a hologram. 

One of my physics tutors, was Frank Meyer, Emeritus Professor from the 
University of Wisconsin system. He was the president of the group that 
advocates Dewey B Larson's Reciprocal System. He told me the physical 
universe was flashing off and on, like a strobe light. A Canadian 
researcher published high speed photographs showing a phenomena called 
Bosivert Gaps. When I mentioned them to Frank, he was vindicated. I read 
a similar story in the book, Holographic Universe. BTW, Puthoff's 
research is mentioned several times in the book. Perhaps Hoyt Sterns 
will comment about Reciprocity.



Planck sized nougaty bite-size bits on a pringle-shaped universe of some
kind. Can I get some quantum foam atop my Guiness?

There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of 
conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact. -- Mark Twain
 

C to C AM regularly has guests on who are theoretical physicists, Micho 
Kaku being a classic case in point. Given some of his ideas, which IMHO, 
would be great grist for an edition of Analog or Amazing Stories, I 
question his having either foot on the ground. Applied physicists,  Hal 
Puthoff being a case in point is grounded in the reality of producing 
changes in the physical world. OTOH, if that's just a hologram, then 
anything should be possible. Hum, why am I having such a difficult time 
getting money?




--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- 
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---



Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia blacklists LENR-CANR.org

2009-01-16 Thread Steven Krivit
unless, as I've heard you used Gmail which does not include originating IP 
in the headers.

can anybody confirm/disconfirm?

At 07:42 AM 1/15/2009, you wrote:

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 A link meaning what? A copy of an e-mail message? That can easily be
 faked.

Not if you include the hidden header information.  It becomes
entirely traceable.

Terry




Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia blacklists LENR-CANR.org and NET too

2009-01-16 Thread Steven Krivit

Jed,

I suppose it would be fair to inform you that I have been aware for a few 
weeks that user JxG, (Guy Chapman from the U.K.) blacklisted both of our 
sites on Dec. 18. Yours, I think, was upgraded (by JzG's encouragement) to 
an international Wikimedia meta blacklist. People in Italy are suffering 
from the consequences of blacklisted access to lenr-canr.org.


I have been investigating this situation somewhat, but not entirely, 
quietly and would like to continue in that mode until my investigation is 
complete.


I think that is about all I want to say on this right now.

The ol' man in the Dime Box Saloon is worth listening to. He says here:

Speaking of pigs, the Dime Box Saloon downright absurd and drunken  ideas 
society is thinking of starting a website to compete with Wiki but we 
haven't come up with a name for it. Any chance you have an insider at Wiki 
that could help us ?


I have found that Citizendium was born as an offshoot of Wikipedia for many 
of the exact reasons that we are aware of, with regard to Wikipedia's faults.

http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Citizendium


Steve 

[Vo]:Are they all correct?

2009-01-16 Thread mixent
Hi,

There are various theories that describe the motion of the electron in the
Hydrogen atom. Since each of these theories obeys the conservation laws, it is
at least plausible that none of them represent the whole truth. Perhaps the
electron behaves according to any/each of them, varying from time to time based
upon instantaneous circumstances? After all, the only true constraint placed
upon the electron is that it obey the conservation laws. So perhaps one moment
the H atom is a Schrodinger atom, and a moment later it is a Bohr atom, then a
moment later again, a Mills atom?

The main difference between them would appear to be the angular momentum in the
ground state, but this could increase or decrease through collisions with other
atoms, allowing the atom to switch from one model to another.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html



Re: [Vo]:Are they all correct?

2009-01-16 Thread Horace Heffner


On Jan 16, 2009, at 7:55 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:


Hi,

There are various theories that describe the motion of the electron  
in the
Hydrogen atom. Since each of these theories obeys the conservation  
laws, it is
at least plausible that none of them represent the whole truth.  
Perhaps the
electron behaves according to any/each of them, varying from time  
to time based
upon instantaneous circumstances? After all, the only true  
constraint placed
upon the electron is that it obey the conservation laws. So perhaps  
one moment
the H atom is a Schrodinger atom, and a moment later it is a Bohr  
atom, then a

moment later again, a Mills atom?

The main difference between them would appear to be the angular  
momentum in the
ground state, but this could increase or decrease through  
collisions with other

atoms, allowing the atom to switch from one model to another.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html



As the time intervals for observation get shorter, the rules of  
conservation diminish in their precision.


Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/






[Vo]:Wikipedia, cold fusion, and censorship

2009-01-16 Thread Horace Heffner
Wikipedia has been infested by a cult of denial, censorship, and  
hypocracy that casts a dark shadow on the spirit of wiki and the  
freedom of information that is the spirit of the internet itself.   
The members of this cult regard themselves as sufficient experts in  
the fields of cold fusion, low energy nuclear reactions, chemically  
assisted nuclear reactions, and condensed matter nuclear science to  
edit, deny, or censor material or references written by PhD experts  
in these fields - while not having attended any international  
conferences in the field, read the important papers in the field, or  
even been exposed to the field enough to know who is who in the  
field.  This cult is a disgrace to Wikipedia.  The fundamental value  
of the cult members is the denial of the reality, validity, or truth  
of the vast amount of science and literature in this field.  It is a  
culture of fear, fear that the precious position of denial will be  
exposed as ridiculously wrong.


This cult of denial refuses to recognize that the body of information  
and terminology in a field belongs to its experts and practitioners,  
regardless how that cult or anyone else might feel about that body of  
information, its emotional, spiritual, or scientific content.  The  
cult apparently refuses to recognize that LENR-CARN.org is a premier  
repository for freely accessible articles on cold fusion and related  
field.  This site, Dieter Britz's COLD NUCLEAR FUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY,  
http://www.chem.au.dk/~db/fusion, and newenergytimes.com are three of  
the major comprehensive repositories of free information on cold  
fusion, and readily recognized by experts in the field.  Treating any  
of these site URLs as SPAM is merely a tactic to suppress  
information regarding cold fusion.  Further, the cult is apparently  
unable to even recognize Jed Rothwell, librarian of LENR-CANR.org and  
author and translator of books and numerous articles in the field for  
two decades, as any kind of authority, or his site as a public service.


Wiki provides articles titled: Alchemy, Astrology, Numerology, Magic,  
Witchcraft, Demonology, Conjuring, Divination, Prophecy,  
Supernatural, Dualism, Monism, Miracle, Neopaganism, Paranormal,  
Preternatural, Fairies, Werewolves, Vampires, Zombies, Chupacabra,  
Wizard, Druidry, Hoodo, Palo, Pow-wow, Psychonautics, and Mojo.  If  
these bodies of knowledge are worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, then  
surely the body of knowledge regarding cold fusion and related fields  
must have some valid place in Wikipedia, because the exclusion of the  
extensive body of cold fusion knowledge is hypocritical in the  
extreme.  Further, the above articles include linkages to all kinds  
sites that should be excluded from Wikipedia if LENR-CANR.org is  
excluded.  Consider the external links in the Astrology article.
For example, consider the open directory link:


http://www.dmoz.org/Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Divination/ 
Astrology//


Perhaps this link shows a direction toward compromise with  
Wikipedia.  The open directory can be used to form links related to  
the cold fusion field, and referenced in Wikipedia.  Further, an  
article or articles on cold fusion and related fields might be  
included without controversy if an appropriate disclaimer written by  
the cult of denial were included at the front of the article.  At  
least that would prevent the body of knowledge of the field of cold  
fusion from being fully suppressed, despite the fact it includes  
articles by Nobel Laureates, professors, PhD's, and scientists  
working at US government labs.  When the cold fusion field is proven  
valid sufficiently, say by sale of useful products, the disclaimer by  
the deniers can simply be removed. Meanwhile the field and the  
documentation of it in Wikipedia can proceed unhindered.  That  
documentation is every bit as valid, useful, and appropriate to  
Wikipedia  as any of the above articles, regardless the emotional  
content it may have for some individuals.


Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/






Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia, cold fusion, and censorship

2009-01-16 Thread Steven Krivit

So noted


At 09:48 PM 1/16/2009, you wrote:

Wikipedia has been infested by a cult of denial, censorship, and
hypocracy that casts a dark shadow on the spirit of wiki and the


[snip]