[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:​Nuclear Excitation by Two-Photon Electron Transition

[H LV]

> ​​
> Nuclear Excitation by Two-Photon Electron Transition
>
> A. V. Volotka, A. Surzhykov, S. Trotsenko, G. Plunien, Th. Stöhlker, and
> S. Fritzsche
>
> Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 243001 – Published 5 December 2016
>
>

​Full paper

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.02570.pdf​



> ​
> ABSTRACT
> ​ ( Note: go to site for proper text format)​
>
>
> A new mechanism of nuclear excitation via two-photon electron transitions
> (NETP) is proposed and studied theoretically. As a generic example,
> detailed calculations are performed for the E1E1 1s2s1S0→1s21S0 two-photon
> decay of a He-like 225Ac87+ ion with a resonant excitation of the 3/2+
> nuclear state with an energy of 40.09(5) keV. The probability for such a
> two-photon decay via the nuclear excitation is found to be PNETP=3.5×10−9
> ​
> and, thus, is comparable with other mechanisms, such as nuclear excitation
> by electron transition and by electron capture. The possibility for the
> experimental observation of the proposed mechanism is thoroughly discussed.
>
> ​http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.243001​
>
> Harry
>
>

[Vo]:​Nuclear Excitation by Two-Photon Electron Transition

[H LV]

​​
Nuclear Excitation by Two-Photon Electron Transition

A. V. Volotka, A. Surzhykov, S. Trotsenko, G. Plunien, Th. Stöhlker, and S.
Fritzsche

Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 243001 – Published 5 December 2016

​
ABSTRACT
​ ( Note: go to site for proper text format)​


A new mechanism of nuclear excitation via two-photon electron transitions
(NETP) is proposed and studied theoretically. As a generic example,
detailed calculations are performed for the E1E1 1s2s1S0→1s21S0 two-photon
decay of a He-like 225Ac87+ ion with a resonant excitation of the 3/2+
nuclear state with an energy of 40.09(5) keV. The probability for such a
two-photon decay via the nuclear excitation is found to be PNETP=3.5×10−9
​
and, thus, is comparable with other mechanisms, such as nuclear excitation
by electron transition and by electron capture. The possibility for the
experimental observation of the proposed mechanism is thoroughly discussed.

​http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.243001​

Harry

[Vo]:General theory of nuclear excitation by electron transitions

[H LV]

General theory of nuclear excitation by electron transitions

A. Ya. Dzyublik

Phys. Rev. C 88, 054616 – Published 25 November 2013

ABSTRACT

We described the nuclear excitation by electron transition (NEET) by using
strict collision theory combined with quantum electrodynamics. All stages
of the process are considered, which include ionization of the atom by an
x-ray photon with the formation of the hole in an inner electronic shell,
its decay accompanied by the excitation of the nucleus, and the subsequent
deexcitation of the nucleus. The cross sections for the NEET and
photoabsorption of x rays are calculated near the threshold. We also
analyzed the fine structure of the NEET curve analogous to the extended
x-ray-absorption fine structure, well known in x-ray optics. The results
agree with the findings of Kishimoto et al. [Phys. Rev. C 74, 031301(R)
(2006)].

​http://journals.aps.org/prc/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.054616

Harry​

[Vo]:Mass Measurement Technique Uncovers New Iron Isomer

[H LV]

Mass Measurement Technique Uncovers New Iron Isomer
​(from 2008)​


A ground state atomic nucleus can be something of a black box, masking
subtle details about its structure behind the aggregate interplay of its
protons and neutrons. This is one reason nuclear scientists are so keenly
interested in isomers -- relatively long-lived excited-state nuclei that
more easily give up their structural secrets to experimentalists.

For years, gamma ray spectroscopy has been one of the only reliable means
of studying isomers. But now scientists have a new tool at their disposal.
In a paper that will be published in Physical Review Letters, researchers
at Michigan State University's National Superconducting Laboratory (NSCL)
report the first ever discovery of a nuclear isomer by Penning trap mass
spectrometry.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/03/080320191308.htm

​Harry​

[Vo]:generating energy transitions in nuclear isomers

[H LV]

New theoretical calculations show that an x-ray free-electron-laser pulse
can generate transitions in excited nuclei via an indirect process
involving electron capture.

https://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/20

Harry

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Axil Axil]

Whenever we can get the spin of an atom to move: whenever we can get a spin
to lose OR gain energy, that energy can be transferred to an electron with
high efficiency.  There are a number of ways that atomic spin can be
excited: magnetocaloric where heat energy is transferred to the spin of an
atom embedded in a lattice through metal lattice phonons of that lattice or
quantum mechanical vibrations that are inherent in the heisenberg
uncertainty principle. The key is to amplify this naturally occurring spin
movements enough to move electrons strong enough to generate usable
voltages and currents. That amplification mechanism might be done by
setting up a coherence boundary condition that involves a change of state
between coherence and incoherence where a slight external magnetic
perturbation triggers this change of state.

Barium ferrite might be a magnetic current superconductor where magnetic
currents flow inside its lattice.

An example of this  magnetic current superconductor might be a magnet that
allows magnetic flux lines to pass through it or not based on an
external parameter: may be temperature or an external magnetic perturbation as
an example.

See (Barium ferrite is a magnetic insulator)

http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v16/n3/full/nmat4812.html

Current-induced switching in a magnetic insulator

The spin Hall effect in heavy metals converts charge current into pure spin
current, which can be injected into an adjacent ferromagnet to exert a
torque. This spin–orbit torque (SOT) has been widely used to manipulate the
magnetization in metallic ferromagnets. In the case of magnetic insulators
(MIs), although charge currents cannot flow, spin currents can propagate,
but current-induced control of the magnetization in a MI has so far
remained elusive. Here we demonstrate spin-current-induced switching of a
perpendicularly magnetized thulium iron garnet film driven by charge
current in a Pt overlayer. We estimate a relatively large spin-mixing
conductance and damping-like SOT through spin Hall magnetoresistance and
harmonic Hall measurements, respectively, indicating considerable spin
transparency at the Pt/MI interface. We show that spin currents injected
across this interface lead to deterministic magnetization reversal at low
current densities, paving the road towards ultralow-dissipation spintronic
devices based on MIs.

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Jones Beene  wrote:

> Whenever purported "free energy" phenomena turn up with no apparent source
> of excess energy, there are a limited number of candidates which seem to
> rear their ugly heads.
>
> This only applies to LENR in the absence of real nuclear energy, but the
> nucleus can be part of a combined MO. In rough order of scientific validity
> and usefulness, these candidates for the source of gain are:
>
> 1) ZPE (aether, raumenergie, dynamical Casimir effect, space energy,
> vacuum energy, quantum energy, Hotson epo field, quantum foam, etc)
> 2) CMB cosmic microwave background (3K-CMB)
> 2) neutrinos
> 4) Schumann resonance
> 5) Fair weather field
> 6) Magnetic field of earth
> 7) Ambient heat (plus deep heat sink)
> 8) Below absolute zero (deeper heat sink)
> 9) Anti-gravity effect
>
> There are more but they tend to be different wording or combinations of
> the above ... and even more incredulous. Many combinations are possible.
>
> The main reason for bringing this up is that recently CMB has been
> estimated to be slightly more robust than once thought and with new ways to
> couple to it. The CMB is probably a subset of ZPE but the energy density of
> space in terms of the microwave-only spectrum is the equivalent of 0.261 eV
> per cubic cm, though the actual temperature of 2.7 K is much less than that
> would indicate - and the peak of the spectrum is at a frequency of 160.4
> GHz. ZPE as a whole may be more robust, but CMB is adequate for many uses.
>
> The peak intensity of the background is about... ta ad.. a whopping 385
> MJy/Sr (that's MegaJanskys per Steradian (I kid you not) which is a
> candidate for the oddest metric in all of free energy, maybe all of physics
> ... along with furlongs per fortnight).
>
> At any rate, if one could invent the way to couple to CMB easily, it would
> be possible to see an effective temperature equivalent in an excellent
> range for thermionics, for instance. The ~2 mm wavelength is interesting
> too. There have been fringe reports of anomalies with 13 gauge wire but
> anything with the number 13 is going to bring out the worst ...
>
>

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Jones Beene]

Whenever purported "free energy" phenomena turn up with no apparent 
source of excess energy, there are a limited number of candidates which 
seem to rear their ugly heads.


This only applies to LENR in the absence of real nuclear energy, but the 
nucleus can be part of a combined MO. In rough order of scientific 
validity and usefulness, these candidates for the source of gain are:


1) ZPE (aether, raumenergie, dynamical Casimir effect, space energy, 
vacuum energy, quantum energy, Hotson epo field, quantum foam, etc)

2) CMB cosmic microwave background (3K-CMB)
2) neutrinos
4) Schumann resonance
5) Fair weather field
6) Magnetic field of earth
7) Ambient heat (plus deep heat sink)
8) Below absolute zero (deeper heat sink)
9) Anti-gravity effect

There are more but they tend to be different wording or combinations of 
the above ... and even more incredulous. Many combinations are possible.


The main reason for bringing this up is that recently CMB has been 
estimated to be slightly more robust than once thought and with new ways 
to couple to it. The CMB is probably a subset of ZPE but the energy 
density of space in terms of the microwave-only spectrum is the 
equivalent of 0.261 eV per cubic cm, though the actual temperature of 
2.7 K is much less than that would indicate - and the peak of the 
spectrum is at a frequency of 160.4 GHz. ZPE as a whole may be more 
robust, but CMB is adequate for many uses.


The peak intensity of the background is about... ta ad.. a whopping 385 
MJy/Sr (that's MegaJanskys per Steradian (I kid you not) which is a 
candidate for the oddest metric in all of free energy, maybe all of 
physics ... along with furlongs per fortnight).


At any rate, if one could invent the way to couple to CMB easily, it 
would be possible to see an effective temperature equivalent in an 
excellent range for thermionics, for instance. The ~2 mm wavelength is 
interesting too. There have been fringe reports of anomalies with 13 
gauge wire but anything with the number 13 is going to bring out the 
worst ...

[Vo]:LENR has economical friends

[Peter Gluck]

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-24-2017-lenr-has-too-many.html

peter
-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

[Axil Axil]

Barium ferrite is a topological insulator. Unlike other types of magnets,
Barium ferrite does not conduct electricity.  It also has a characteristic
 known as perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA). This situation
originates from the inherent magneto-crystalline anisotropy of the
insulator and not the interfacial anisotropy in other situations.  As a
Mott insulator, it possesses strong spin orbit coupling. This
characteristic produces a log jam of electrons that stops current from
flowing.

See for details,

https://phys.org/news/2017-02-reveals-quantum-state-strange-insulating.html

Research reveals novel quantum state in strange insulating materialsFebruary
9, 2017

As a Mott insulator, Barium ferrite also has another characteristic
called linear
magnetoresistance (LMR). The origin of the LMR in this case is likely
related to small density variations throughout the solid which cannot be
avoided in conventional material growth techniques. This leads to a
contribution of a linear Hall resistance caused by the Lorentz force
in a magnetic
field  on a moving electron on the
measured magnetoresistance.

Read more at:
https://phys.org/news/2016-12-linear-magnetoresistanceexotic-classical.html#jCp

The origin of linear magnetoresistance—exotic or classical?

IMHO, the differences in the two types of magnetic materials used in the
Sweet system and the Manelas system make operating quantum mechanical
mechanisms of these two systems different.

Finally, a magnetizing coil wrapped around the edge of the magnetic billet
will produce a field where the edges of the billet demonstrates a south
pole. This is because the field lines nearest the magnetizing coil are the
strongest and a north pole bubble in the middle where the magnetic field
lines are the weakest.

A huge amount of work must be done to understand how these types of *Vacuum
Triode Amplifier *systems work.  But the prospect of understanding how the
reported trust production characteristics work like what occurs in the
EDDrive system might make the investment in all that work worthwhile.

Finally, unlike LENR, the lack of subatomic particle production is also a
selling feature of these systems well worth the work to understand.


On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Brian Ahern  wrote:

> See bellow
>
>
> If you have the time, this video explains how the cooling occurs:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPd9vYvJoH0=1s
> 
> magnetic cooling 
> www.youtube.com
> Notes, playlist: http://thephysicsnotes.com/U-Level-Physics-Videos/
> statistical-physics/Boltzmann%20distribution.html
>
>
>
> With the additional info provided by Brian Ahern upthread, my best guess
> now is that magnetic flux produces electron movement. These changes in the
> magnetic field produced by the magnetic billet are induced by the magnetic
> flux change produced when the input current flows through the input coil.
>
> What I would like to know is what coils of the three coils are the input
> and output coils. We do not know.
>
> The random motion of the magnetic domains in the crystal structure of the
> billet due to both the uncertainty principle and thermal movement of
> magnetic domains might be where excess magnetic flux is coming from. This
> input magnetic flux might induce that "magnetic noise" to increase.
>
> Just by flipping a few spins on the outside edge of the billet using the
> weak input magnetic flux might produce and avalanche of spin movement
> throughout the billet in many surrounding spins throughout the billet. I
> think you are making sense ,especially the cascading at a resonant
> frequency.
>
> The key to producing more output than input is to adjust the input to the
> minimum amount necessary to produce an increase in magnetic noise from the
> billet.
>
> How the three coils are layered: first applied, then second, then finally
> third would be nice to know.
>
> My guess is the the coil applied to the edge would be the input coil. The
> output coils are the length and width coils. The output coils would be full
> wave rectified.
>
> If magnetic amplification is coming from spin flipping, then using
> separate magnets might not work since the spin flipping would encounter
> discontinuity going from one magnet to another. The avalanche would stop at
> the edge of each individual magnet.
>
> Here is a image of how a slight disturbance in a spin wave can produce
> lots of magnetic flux.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St4ykzFYJts
> 
> Spin Wave Animation 
> www.youtube.com
> This animation shows spin waves propagating through an antiferromagnetic
> material, in which neighboring atoms (balls) have opposite spins (arrows).
> When a photon, or ...
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:22 PM, David Roberson 
> 

[Vo]:Re: Amazon Appstore – Parrot Teacher is Published

[Frank Znidarsic]

Now at amazon with a nice bird icon.


https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06VY5Y5JG/ref=sr_1_3?s=mobile-apps=UTF8=1487945104=1-3



-Original Message-
From: Frank Znidarsic 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 1:17 pm
Subject: Fwd: Amazon Appstore – Parrot Teacher is Published



Parrot Teacher is published in the translatable form.






https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.znidarsic_parrot_talk.parrottalk




Frank Znidarsic