Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

[Terry Blanton]

And then there's bug chitin:

http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 6:37 PM Frogfall  wrote:

> Have a look at this report:
>
> NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program
> https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980201240
> Published 1998
>
> This stuff was all quite open at the time.
>
> In the UK, British Aerospace was also funding antigravity studies, in the
> shape of "Project Greenglow" - which was mainly Dr Ron Evans, who was based
> at their Warton aircraft plant, in Lancashire.  At around that time I went
> along to a talk Ron gave, organised by the Royal Aeronautical Society, at
> Warton.  He described various aspects of his own project, as well as the
> Evgeny Podkletnov work, and the NASA program.
>
> This was all activity that you could imagine would be described as "top
> secret", if it cropped up in some fiction novel. However, the researchers
> seemed to be approaching it as a totally non-classified and open area of
> study.  For Ron Evans, it was just the continuation of a hobby interest,
> prior to retirement.  And, as far as I can remember, the actual budgets
> were tiny.
>
>

Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

[Frogfall]

Have a look at this report:

NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980201240
Published 1998

This stuff was all quite open at the time.

In the UK, British Aerospace was also funding antigravity studies, in the shape 
of "Project Greenglow" - which was mainly Dr Ron Evans, who was based at their 
Warton aircraft plant, in Lancashire.  At around that time I went along to a 
talk Ron gave, organised by the Royal Aeronautical Society, at Warton.  He 
described various aspects of his own project, as well as the Evgeny Podkletnov 
work, and the NASA program.

This was all activity that you could imagine would be described as "top 
secret", if it cropped up in some fiction novel. However, the researchers 
seemed to be approaching it as a totally non-classified and open area of study. 
 For Ron Evans, it was just the continuation of a hobby interest, prior to 
retirement.  And, as far as I can remember, the actual budgets were tiny.

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org downloads increased by ~14,000

[Jed Rothwell]

Robin  wrote:


> >I exclude robot readers after identifying them by various methods.
>
> Why would you exclude them? Surely allowing access would ensure that
> people doing searches would be more likely to find
> the site?
>

Perhaps I should make it clear I am not actually excluding anyone. That is,
blocking anyone. I just mean I am not counting their downloads in the
totals I show at LENR-CANR.org.

When you see a website or some PR person describing how many "visits" or
"downloads" there are to a website, you should bear in mind those numbers
are an approximation. The number of visits and "unique visitors" in
particular varies a great deal depending on what you define as a visit. Log
file records are poorly defined and the format is obsolete, so it is
difficult to sort out what is actually happening at a website.

Utility programs such as Weblog Expert and Awstats estimate vastly
different numbers of "visitors." I think I have seen them vary by a factor
of 4.

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org downloads increased by ~14,000

[Jed Rothwell]

Okay, I found 4,697 records associated with an AI project. I filtered those
out, bringing the July total down to 23,151. It is still substantially more
than the previous month.

https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1213

Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

[ROGER ANDERTON]

also means that "they" have been lying about the theoretical physics - 
namely Einstein has a lot of things wrong (such as Equivalence 
Principle) but "they" haven't been allowing those things to be 
corrected.


-- Original Message --
From: "Terry Blanton" 
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, 2 Aug, 23 At 14:33
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

If there's any truth to the testimony before Congress, we already have 
the tech.


On Wed, Aug 2, 2023, 5:56 AM ROGER ANDERTON  > wrote:











-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"  >

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Sent: Wednesday, 2 Aug, 23 At 02:01
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

That is very interesting! And sad. I wonder how much truth there is to 
reports of antigravity? Perhaps we will never know . . .

Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

[Terry Blanton]

If there's any truth to the testimony before Congress, we already have the
tech.

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023, 5:56 AM ROGER ANDERTON 
wrote:

> <
>
> I got antigravity because Einstein wrong about Equivalence Principle.
>
>
> see video
>
>
> CY LO, DAVID P. CHAN & RICHARD C. Y. HUI - Oversights of Einstein &
> Maxwell and Invalidity of E = mc^2 8 August Vigier Conference 2018 see
> paper: The Temperature Dependence of Gravitation for the Metallic Balls -
> Measured with a Torsion Balance Scale The Global Journal of Science
> Frontier Research Vol 17 Issue 4
>
>
> https://studio.youtube.com/video/oPw3xK-9tVQ/edit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Jed Rothwell" 
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 Aug, 23 At 02:01
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li
>
> That is very interesting! And sad. I wonder how much truth there is to
> reports of antigravity? Perhaps we will never know . . .
>
>

Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

[ROGER ANDERTON]