[Vo]:a message
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/05/may-01-2017-lenr-my-message.html -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:small Sunday issue about myths
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-30-2017-lenr- small-sunday-issue.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR ONLY INFO EDITION
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apt-29-2017-lenr-only-info-edition.html I do not feel well but hope the Info part is rather complete and updated peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR and the dark side of IF
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/pr-28-2017-lenr-dark-side-of-if.html -peter- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com peter
[Vo]:LENR the echo site of the litigation
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-27-2017-lenr-7000-messages-at.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR JUST INFO ISSUE TODAY
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-26-2017-lenr-just-info-issue.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania hthttp://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-26-2017-lenr-just-info-issue.htmltp://egooutpeters.blogspot.com <http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com>
[Vo]:LENR to go away from trouble- how?
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-25-2017-lenr-how-to-go-away-from.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:what I think about opposition to LENR causes and effects
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-24-2017-lenr-what-i-think-about.html Please read my blog associate Georgina's posting too! thanks! peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR why opposition to it? (i)
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-23-2017-lenr-why-opposition-to-it.html -peter Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR EARTH DAY EDITION OF EGO OUT
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-22-2017-lenr-earth-day-edition.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR- the flowmeter's J'accuse!
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-21-2017-lenr- flowmeters-jaccuse.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:PdD vs NiH (both hot), and daily issue of EGO OUT
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/rom-vitalii- kirkinskii-abouti-pdd.html and http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-20-2017-lenr- techno-calumnies.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR- INFO; ABOUT TECHNO-CALUMNIATION
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-19-2017-lenr-and-low-art-of-techno.html -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR Info, learning from Machiavelli
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-18-2017-lenr-info-learning-from.html PLEASE read too the Episode 4 of A Manager's Mirror! thanks! peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR INFO - SHORTISSIMO!
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-17-2017-lenr-info-shortissimo.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:2 ISSUES OF EGO OUT TODAY
First a present for the PdD faithful: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-16-2017-lenr-dr-vitalii-kirkinskii.html and second a shortened current issue: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-16-2017-lenr-current-simplified.html HAPPY EASTER! peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR PREDICTION AND INFO
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-15-2017-lenr-prediction-and-info.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR AND THE PAIN OF RESEARCH
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-14-2017-lenr-few-words-about-pain.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR Info and a short sad/angry editorial
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-13-2017-lenr-from-character.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR Info; remembering Yuri Gagarin
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-12-2017-lenr-info.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR not easy life for research captains
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-11-2017-lenr-not-easy-life-for.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR litigation not meritless
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-10-2017-lenr-litigation-not.html --Please read also my bog associate, Georgina's posting about AMANAGER'S MIRROR EPISODE III peter Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR will not be drowned in a teaspoonful of water!
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-9-2017-lenr-will-not-be-drowned-in.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:Great LENR theory review and INFO
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-8-2017-great-lenr-theory-review-and.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:LENR, THERMODYNAMICS + ! GRAIN OF SALT
Jed, First thanks for coming with a new guru's teaching, the former one (Joe Murray) has inspired you ideas as flow multiplier watermeters, half empty pipes inside a plant, a 40mm steam pipe and clairvoyant witnesses all informing you to know that the watermeter is qudrupling the flow values. You do not have more luck with this Mr. Smith yes both the steam at outlet and the reservoir are at atmospheric pressure just underway many things and pressures happen. The steam goes to the user plant where it is condensed and, being given that the density of steam is some 0.6 kg/cu.m while water is almost 1000kg/m- a lot of "negative" pressure - the necessaryy pressure difference.appears. The water goes to the famous flowmeter and on that point it must be at least at 0.3 bars over atmospheric pressure, you know why!.The in the reservoir which feeds the pumps of the E-Cats. You are right that at pressure a bit higher than the atmospheric water boils at say 104 C. There reverse is true and we have early used pressure cookers that boils usually at 112C. JUST this has nothing to do with the case, 0 over the atmospheric pressure means OPEN for condensation. Re the steam pipe, Smith is more generous than Murray who shrinked it to 40mm, he says it is 4.5inches- the pipe is actually 6 inches. If you want to read a laudatio of your techno-guru 'perhaps what D.T. wrote tioday at Rossi's JONP would be OK for you. Peter On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > In Gluck's blog, he wrote: > > "A recent example is expert Rick Smith using them in order to demonstrate > that the 1MW plant of Andrea Rossi has circulated water not steam and the > steam - if formed could not be superheated- so he ignored one critical > detail - that the fluid had a temperature of 103-104 C at atmospheric > pressure . . ." > > It cannot be at atmospheric pressure. The reservoir is open to the air, so > it is definitely at atmospheric pressure. The pressure gauge is located > just downstream of the reactors, outside of the customer site. If both > locations are at atmospheric pressure, no steam (or water) can flow from > the reactor back to the reservoir. That is impossible. There *has to be* > a pressure difference, as Smith explained. > > Therefore, the pressure gauge reading of 1 atmosphere must be wrong. (I > assume it was supposed to be 0.0 barg, not bar -- which would be a vacuum. > Either way, it is impossible.) > > The pressure must be higher than 1 atm. When it is just a little higher, > the water will not boil at 103-104°C. > > This is elementary thermodynamics. > > See: > > EXPERT REPORT OF RICK A. SMITH, P.E., Document 235-1 > > SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT OF RICK A. SMITH, P.E., Document 235-10 > > The Effects of Pressure on Boiling Point Temperatures > > http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/ > 01/0235.01_Exhibit_1.pdf > > http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/ > 01/0235.10_Exhibit_10.pdf > > https://durathermfluids.com/pdf/techpapers/pressure-boiling-point.pdf > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR, THERMODYNAMICS + ! GRAIN OF SALT
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-7-2017-lenr-and-thermodynamics-1.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR INFO & EMOTIONS
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-6-2017-lenr-info-and-emotions.html -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR STORY AND INFO
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-5-2017-lenr-story-and-info.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR INFO, 1 YEAR RvD LITIGATION
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-4-2017-lenr-info-one-year-litigation.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR INFO ONLY
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-3-2017-lenr-only-some-info.html Please read my blog associate's posting:"A manager's mirrorr (II)" too.. peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.
yes http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/0194.09_Exhibit_9.pdf and some e-mails by him etc. peter On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: > > Was Penon deposed? He is the central figure in the trial. Has he answered > questions under oath? > > If not, why not? > > The ERV is moot without his sworn testimony under fear of jepoardy. > > ------ > *From:* Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, April 3, 2017 10:15 AM > *To:* VORTEX > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics. > > Jed, > you suggest anyone reading the Penon report will have a Rothwellian > negative > revelation of nothingness. > I may ask all our colleagues from this relatively inactive forum,: do you > agree with Jed, or on the contrary they have the intuition of a successful > test? > > The data presented in the report are based on many raw measurements. > > peter > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> If LENR produces tons of energy in the aggregate, it will also produce >>>>> tons of all pervasive and highly penetrating meson based radiation >>>>> exposure. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If that were true, I would be dead. >>>> >>> >> >> >> I doubt that you have seen LENR, at least in any measurable >>> amounts...like Rossi has. >>> >> >> Either you missed the point or you are arguing for arguments sake. >> Suppose I have not seen LENR. Many other people have, at power levels up to >> 100 W. If you are correct, even a fraction of 1 W would generate fatal >> doses of radiation. As I am sure you know, the day after cold fusion was >> announced plasma fusion scientists pointed this out. >> >> If you believe that Rossi has seen kilowatt levels and megawatt levels of >> cold fusion, then surely you understand it cannot be producing radiation at >> the levels you describe. He would be dead. You cannot have it both ways. >> >> In fact, Rossi did not see any cold fusion effect during the one-year >> test. The test was a fraud; the data was fake, as anyone can see from the >> Penon report (Exhibit 197-03) >> >> http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ >> 0197.03_Exhibit_3.pdf >> >> It is possible he saw some effect previously, but I doubt it. >> >> - Jed >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.
Jed, you suggest anyone reading the Penon report will have a Rothwellian negative revelation of nothingness. I may ask all our colleagues from this relatively inactive forum,: do you agree with Jed, or on the contrary they have the intuition of a successful test? The data presented in the report are based on many raw measurements. peter On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> If LENR produces tons of energy in the aggregate, it will also produce >>>> tons of all pervasive and highly penetrating meson based radiation >>>> exposure. >>>> >>> >>> If that were true, I would be dead. >>> >> > > > I doubt that you have seen LENR, at least in any measurable amounts...like >> Rossi has. >> > > Either you missed the point or you are arguing for arguments sake. Suppose > I have not seen LENR. Many other people have, at power levels up to 100 W. > If you are correct, even a fraction of 1 W would generate fatal doses of > radiation. As I am sure you know, the day after cold fusion was announced > plasma fusion scientists pointed this out. > > If you believe that Rossi has seen kilowatt levels and megawatt levels of > cold fusion, then surely you understand it cannot be producing radiation at > the levels you describe. He would be dead. You cannot have it both ways. > > In fact, Rossi did not see any cold fusion effect during the one-year > test. The test was a fraud; the data was fake, as anyone can see from the > Penon report (Exhibit 197-03) > > http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/ > 01/0197.03_Exhibit_3.pdf > > It is possible he saw some effect previously, but I doubt it. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR SUNDAY INFO< LECTURES
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-2-2017-lenr-sunday-info-lectures.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:about the Ssmell...and info
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-01-2017-lenr-about-smell-and-info.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR kiss from Erato and Info
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-31-2107-lenr-kiss-from-eratoand-info.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR NOTE AND INFO
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-30-2017-lenr-note-and-info.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR note, info
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-29-2107-lenr-short-note-info.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR problem solving and info
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-28-2107-lenr-problem-solving-info.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:two postings today,my one about scandsl and info
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-27-2017-lenr-scandal-some-info.html but please see too, for my blog-associate. Georgina's posting, this: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/managers-mirror-pilot- episode-where-am-i-georgina-popescu good lecture! -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR Sunday edition
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-26-2017-lenr-sunday-edition.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR, shorter weekend edition
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-25-2017-lenr-shorter-weekend-edition.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:rare event- information abundance in LENR
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-24-2017-lenr-coping-with.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:28-th Anniversary of Cold Fusion/LENR
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-23-2017-28-years-of-lenr-history.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR Day of the Gullstrom-Rossi paper
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-22-2017-lenr-day-of-gullstrom-rossi.html Tomorrow 28th Anniversary of Cold Fusion, I hope it will be some life on forums blogs etc! peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR INFO, ONE AND HALF DISCUSSIONS
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-21-2017-lenr-info-and-15-discussions.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:rigidity is dangerous for LENR
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-20-2017-rigidity-is-dangerous-for.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR- idealization of "independent"
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-19-2017-lenr-intentional-idalistic.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR Info and more about populism
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-18-2017-lenr-info-and-more-about.html MFMP is back! peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR populism and manipulation
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-17-2017-lenr-about-populism-and.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Palladium cold fusion as an energy source
Basta, signore! The manometer says- no obstacle, steam is condensed. peter On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Who 'delivers' the 4 atm? >> > > Back pressure from the radiator. When you force a fluid through a radiator > (or heat exchanger) this raises the pressure of the fluid. It does not take > much pressure to raise the boiling point of water above 103°C. See: > > https://durathermfluids.com/pdf/techpapers/pressure-boiling-point.pdf > > Contamination will also raise the boiling point. This water was reportedly > dirty. > > > >> You really seem to be in trance. >> OK, tell it is fake but do not give pseudo-technical explanations. >> > > The fact that pressure raises the boiling point is not psuedo-technical. > This has been common knowledge for centuries. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Palladium cold fusion as an energy source
Who 'delivers' the 4 atm? You really seem to be in trance. OK, tell it is fake but do not give pseudo-technical explanations. peter PS I have finished this uselesss discussion, I stil prefer logic. On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Your last variant re Rossi's fake data was this; Exactly zero excess >> heat, watermeter lying 4 Times more flow 103 C fluid water not trace of >> steam. >> > > At 4 atm 103°C water is liquid without a trace of steam. 4 atm is not > much. The back pressure from the radiator was more than this. > > If Rossi has valid data showing real excess heat, why did he publish > nonsense fake data showing he is a crude fraud? And why didn't he > demonstrate this heat to I.H. during the year he worked in North Carolina. > They would have paid him $89 million. > > Rossi's own data, that he uploaded in this court case, proves he is a > fraud. That's all there is to it. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Palladium cold fusion as an energy source
Excellent, from now on, if I see ads for investing in PD D I will know they are not by you. As regarding NiH we willl see. I suppose you have called main author Nakamura from NISSAN and asked him what he thinks about NiH. Your last variant re Rossi's fake data was this; Exactly zero excess heat, watermeter lying 4 Times more flow 103 C fluid water not trace of steam. Not exactly a solid mental construct but you MUST do such things. Your problem or your prvilege. Steam pipe still 40 mm Murray style? Watermeter working fractionary full/empty? As an partial aside are you familiar with Edwrd de Bono thinking methods/ peter On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> you ignore with easiness the reproducibility problem >> > > I did not ignore it. I stated clearly that this is predicated on > controlling the reaction. I said "Assumption. With Pd-D 200 W/g can be > achieved, at any desired temperature up to the melting point of Pd." If > that cannot be done, Pd-D cannot be commercialized. > > > >> Cna you tell me the rtae of success NOW say at >> SKINR, ENEA, Coolescence and others? >> > > These places have not succeeded. That is why there are no commercial cold > fusion devices. No one can control Ti or Ni cold fusion either. Rossi > claims that he can, but that is not true. If he could, he would not have > put fake data in the spreadsheets, and I.H. would have paid him $89 million. > > > >> Re the ERv report it has 60 pages . . . >> > > I do not think so. > > > >> , you have seen 352 daily reports >> not 8448 hourly ones and not the results for 506880 minutes (approx) >> > > I do not think there are any hourly reports, but if there are, and if they > agree with the daily reports, they are also fake. You cannot have a daily > summary showing fake data which is based on hourly data that is real. The > hourly data would have to show pressure of 0.0 bar, which is impossible, > and it would have to show temperatures that average (or peak) at the exact > same temperature to the nearest tenth degree every day for weeks. That's > impossible. It is preposterous. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Palladium cold fusion as an energy source
Jed, you ignore with easiness the reproducibility problem Cna you tell me the rtae of success NOW say at SKINR, ENEA, Coolescence and others? Re the ERv report it has 60 pages, you have seen 352 daily reports not 8448 hourly ones and not the results for 506880 minutes (approx) When the litigation story will be over and i am still here, I will organize a course of Technology Awakening for people now on the level of Exhibit 5 of IH. peter On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > mre cells with death after (no) heat. >> > > I do not know what this sentence means. Perhaps you are saying that Pd-D > does not produce heat after death. That's incorrect. It does. There is no > input power, so the COP is infinite. > > > >> probably not true for Ti- very abundent element have worked with it. For >> CF remeber Scaramuzzi and our friend Chino has done a lot with Ti. >> Au is Au and has it s place in electromivvcs. >> So please do not mention PD based commercial energy sources. >> > > You have not given any technical or practical reason why Pd-D cannot be > commercialized. If these other metals work, there would be no reason to use > Pd. But if they do not, and Pd is the only choice, it can produce a > significant fraction of our energy. Fleischmann was correct about that, and > you are wrong. > > > >> Re the Exh 1, surely i have it and what you are missing is the hourly and >> the recorded data which will make you smarter and will determine you to not >> pontificate. >> > > As far as I know, there is no hourly data. > > Anyone can see that Penon and Rossi stuffed imaginary numbers into these > spreadsheets. One-hour data that agrees with this would also be imaginary. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Palladium cold fusion as an energy source
mre cells with death after (no) heat. probably not true for Ti- very abundent element have worked with it. For CF remeber Scaramuzzi and our friend Chino has done a lot with Ti. Au is Au and has it s place in electromivvcs. So please do not mention PD based commercial energy sources. Re the Exh 1, surely i have it and what you are missing is the hourly and the recorded data which will make you smarter and will determine you to not pontificate. good night, peter On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > b) The heavy water gives D2 with a consume of energy good COP is >> say 1.30 to be optimist . . . >> > > There have been many cells with heat after death for long periods. That is > a COP of infinity. Once the reaction is understood and controlled, I am > confident a low COP will be possible. > > > >> , so you will consume 780 W (power) for getting 100 w power= imagine >> your generator s a huge F Cell- or do you have different idea? >> > > F achieved much better COPs than this. > > > >> For any rational human being it is clear the PdD CF/LENR in its actual >> stage of development cannot be a commercial energy source. >> > > Of course! That is equally true of Ti, Au and Ni. It isn't even clear that > Ni cold fusion exists. > > > >> You could learn a lot from the 1MW 1year test of Andrea Rossi. Real or >> not, it is instructive. >> > > You can learn all you need to know from Rossi's data. It is fake. If you > can't see that, you have lost all ability to analyze experimental data. The > data is here, uploaded by Rossi himself: > > http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/ > 01/0128.1_Exhibit_1.pdf > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:to create a better LENR culture (ii)
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-16-2017-creation-of-true-lenr.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:creation of a true LENR culture
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-15-2017-creation-of-true-lenr.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Palladium cold fusion as an energy source
Jed You forget a few details: a) Your first and probably most correct;evaluation was 300 W/cc palladium and thi is 25 W/g; b) The heavy water gives D2 with a consume of energy good COP is say 1.30 to be optimist, so you will consume 780 W (power) for getting 100 w power= imagine your generator s a huge F Cell- or do you have different idea? For any rational human being it is clear the PdD CF/LENR in its actual stage of development cannot be a commercial energy source. You could learn a lot from the 1MW 1year test of Andrea Rossi. Real or not, it is instructive. peter On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is a brief analysis of the cost of a 1 MW palladium-based generator -- > > I estimate that palladium can produce ~200 W/g, so you would need 5 kg. > This costs $119,000 at today's prices. An EPRI study shows that a > conventional 1 MW generator costs $267,000, so this would not cost much > more than a conventional generator, and it would be far cheaper than a 1 MW > wind turbine. With a conventional generator, over the life of the machine, > the fuel costs more than the machine. With cold fusion, the fuel cost would > negligible, so lifetime costs would be far lower. > > The generator portion of 1 MW wind turbine costs about the same as a 1 MW > combustion generator, but the tower costs $1.3 million. Yet wind is > competitive with combustion generators because the fuel is free -- wind > costs nothing. With cold fusion, the extra $119,000 you pay for palladium > is far less than the cost of the wind turbine tower. > > Regarding fuel costs, high purity heavy water today costs ~$1000/kg. It > will be much cheaper with cold fusion, because most of that cost is for the > energy used to separate heavy water from ordinary water. 1 kg of heavy > water produces 69 million megajoules of heat. A 1 MW reactor consumes 3 MJ > of heat per second, so that's 23 million seconds, or 266 days, or $3.76 per > day. Actually, it would be far cheaper because heavy water will be cheaper, > as I said. > > The EPRI generator data is on p. 2-5 here: > > http://www.publicpower.org/files/deed/finalreportcostsofutilitydistr > ibutedgenerators.pdf > > - Jed > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR_FALSE INFALLIBILITY, USELESS CRUELTY
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-14-2017-lenrlenr-false.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR, evil normality, toxic perfectionism
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-13-2017-lenr-evil-normality-toxic.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:why has the cygnification of the little ugly LENR duckling delayed so much?
because he has not moved in the proper place! http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-12-2017-lenr-sad-story-of-retarded.html please read the essay of Maria Popova at LENR IN CONTEXT-2 too It is Sunday! peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR IMMUNITY FROM REALISM, FACTS...
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-11-2017-lenr-immunity-from-realism.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR -A MIRROR SITUATION
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-10-2017-lenr-mirror-situation.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:preparing for the pro NiH battle
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-09-2017-lenr-preparing-for-pro-nih.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR DOES NOT NEED FACTOIDS
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-08-2017-lenr-does-not-need-factoids.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR"S INDECISIONS, FABIO PENON'S DECISION
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-07-2017-for-lenr-indecision-is.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR HOW TO DO WELL THE DIRTY WORK
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-06-2017-lenr-how-to-do-well-dirty.html Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:SUNDAY ISSUE, LENR BEAUTY OF THE FOG
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-05-2017-lenr-sunday-issue-beauty-of.html --peter Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR NAVIGATING IN FOG
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-04-2017-lenr-navigating-in-fog.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:dearth of clarity in LENR-land
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-03-2017-for-lenr-clarity-is-quasi.html -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR over-replication?
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-02-2017-lenr-imitation-limitation.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:II- LENR AND THE DECALOG OF OPPRESSORS
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-01-2017-has-lenr-something-to-do.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR AND THE DECALOG OF OPPRESSORS
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-28-2017-has-lenr-something-to-do.html -peter- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Good summary of LENR & Rossi by Mats Lewan
dear Adrian please read my EGO OUT I noticed it yesterday best, peter On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:44 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > Originally published in World Affairs in January, this has become > available on Lewan's blog. > It is a good summary of the LENR situation with Rossi and the worldwide > implications. > > https://animpossibleinvention.com/2017/02/25/world-affairs-c > old-fusion-an-impossible-invention/ > > AA > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:again- what if LENR gets BIG MONEY?
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-27-and-if-lenr-gets-big-money.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR, Axiom and paradox of thorny mimosas
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-26-2017-lenr-and-thorny-mimosa.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR remembering "know how"
weekend issue http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-25-2017-lenr-remembering-know-how.html -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR has economical friends
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-24-2017-lenr-has-too-many.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:for LENR three questions and one great report
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-23-2017-lenr-3-questions-1-great.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:the architect could not build sa fake bridge
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-22-2017-architect-could-not-build.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:Negative energies in LENR land
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-21-2017-about-negative-energies-in.html Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon
ing what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE > > > > > > Chris Zell wrote: > > If I google “phonons as an energy source”, nothing in particular comes > up. If we are identifying them as the likely source of excess energy > within a barium/strontium ferrite structure, I would think that someone > somewhere has thought about cohering them into useful energy. > > > > But if you google "Microelectromechanical systems" you will get 750,000 > hits. > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Penon described the position of flow meter
Jed, Penon simply says flowmeter between JMP plant and E-Cats and anybody who has seen a plant knows ab ovo it MUST be immediately after the pump water flow measured, injected in the E-Cats on JONP Rossi said more times piping forms U flowmeter down- standard engineering you say- "many pumps, but they could not produce this much flow." Much flow, 6.6 gallons per minute, 25kg/minute too much...were you awake when you wrote this? (I know you are not drinking too much alcohol so the explanation must be something bad) Next discussion with you when you have the diagram. Waeted time is not recoverable.. I must confess I am in very bad mood have to write a Blog nd no LENR papers have arrived today, in no language. Desperation! Few LENR related papers & news. But it is early, I still hope. peter On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:27 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > Jed, > I thought you said earlier that you had the plumbing layout but were not > allowed to show it. If so, there should be no doubt about whether there > is U in the system. > > AA > > On 2/20/2017 8:41 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > There has been some discussion here about the position of the flow meter > in Rossi's configuration. I have information from Rossi showing it was > located in the gravity return between the customer site and the reservoir. > I do not think there was a U pipe but I cannot rule that out 100%. Nothing > like that is shown and no one who was there told me there is one -- and I > did ask. Anyway, Abd pointed out that Penon described the configuration in > one of the lawsuit documents. It is a little hard to understand Penon's > English, so Abd added the comments in square brackets: > > Quote > > The steam is then passed through the customer’s facility, where it cools >> up to its condensation. * >> >> – flowmeter for measuring the flow rate of cooling water inlet into the >> shelter. It is located along the line of return of the water. between the >> Plant of the Customer and the 1 MW E-Cat. > > > >> The cooling water is contained in a tank, placed inside the Plant, that >> receives the water from an external plant [sic, “tank”]. >> > > >> It is conveyed by pumps in [sic, “into”] the unit’s E-cat[s], where it is >> heated to vaporize. The steam is collected in one tube of the steam line, >> which conveys it to the outside of the shelter. >> > > >> The water is so recycled to the internal [sic, external] tank in a closed >> loop. The water is distilled water. >> > > >> The external tank is connected with the internal tank, by a water line >> and a floating valve, so that the level of water inside the internal tank >> is maintained constant. The water flows from the external tank to the >> internal tank by gravity. […] >> > > > * Note from Jed: "Cools up to its condensation" means it cools down until > it condenses. > > This contradicts assertions by Peter Gluck. > > - Jed > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Penon described the position of flow meter
This was dicussed already twice but DeJavu is a reality (see my blog today about the psychological phenomenon). Question: do yu have information from Rossi or you have the piping diagram of the plant showing clearly and exactly (as position) where in the gravity return pipe was placed the flowmeter? Can you ke a look and tell where was placed the main pump (for 1500 kg/hour- floating in the air or firmly placed on the ground? In any case NOT measuring the flow of water which enters directly to the generators and using a 25 times undersized pipe for steam are fatal flaws and if your favorite author Murray got it right than he is the diamond witness for IH. On the contrary if he errs than he is just a plant illiterate trying to find imaginary things- doing harm fo those who have paid him. If you have such a ardent desire to contradict my assertions, show the diagram and..finita la commedia! It happens I know steam is able to condense from practice and books. peter ps Do you have amnesia regarding the persons who all stated the flowmeter was used to quadruple the flow? You tell sensational things and we have to believe you On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > There has been some discussion here about the position of the flow meter > in Rossi's configuration. I have information from Rossi showing it was > located in the gravity return between the customer site and the reservoir. > I do not think there was a U pipe but I cannot rule that out 100%. Nothing > like that is shown and no one who was there told me there is one -- and I > did ask. Anyway, Abd pointed out that Penon described the configuration in > one of the lawsuit documents. It is a little hard to understand Penon's > English, so Abd added the comments in square brackets: > > Quote > > The steam is then passed through the customer’s facility, where it cools >> up to its condensation. * >> >> – flowmeter for measuring the flow rate of cooling water inlet into the >> shelter. It is located along the line of return of the water. between the >> Plant of the Customer and the 1 MW E-Cat. > > > >> The cooling water is contained in a tank, placed inside the Plant, that >> receives the water from an external plant [sic, “tank”]. >> > > >> It is conveyed by pumps in [sic, “into”] the unit’s E-cat[s], where it is >> heated to vaporize. The steam is collected in one tube of the steam line, >> which conveys it to the outside of the shelter. >> > > >> The water is so recycled to the internal [sic, external] tank in a closed >> loop. The water is distilled water. >> > > >> The external tank is connected with the internal tank, by a water line >> and a floating valve, so that the level of water inside the internal tank >> is maintained constant. The water flows from the external tank to the >> internal tank by gravity. […] >> > > > * Note from Jed: "Cools up to its condensation" means it cools down until > it condenses. > > This contradicts assertions by Peter Gluck. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR Theoryplex, discussions some info
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-20-2017-lenr-theoryplex-discussions.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR Professionalism independent and Innovative thinking
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-19-2017-professional-approach-to.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:integrity of the LENR profesional?
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-18-2017-professional-approach-to.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:professional approach to LENR, but how?
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-17-2017-proffessional-approach-to.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument
Jed, you have no idea what other people think. The pipe you are showing there has nothing to do with the plant. I was working with pipes in plants when you were stll in the kindergarten, you say too many inept things loud. I remember when you told the first time - getting no other explnation for the moronity with the hal full pipes than that the flowmeter was in the grqvity retiurn pipe- but I bet you have no digram and I bet the flowmeter is not on that pipe. You are just defending a long ago lost position and impossible idea. You do ot respect the rules of professionality and it is very difficult to discuss with you. I will discuss again when you show the diagram, OK? I fear you are really believing what you say, lying is more sane. peter On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > > >> I rather liked Rossi's comment. Discussing the flowmeter on the blogs >> before the full information is released in court is about as useful as >> discussing the sex of angels. >> > > That is bullshit. We have Rossi's data. We have detailed information on > this flowmeter, including the manual. These conclusions are inescapable -- > > The pump is far too big for this application. A pump that registers 36 > times per day is absurd. > > The flow data is impossibly regular, as is the other data. > > The flow data shows 36,000 kg/day and high heat on days when *Rossi > himself reported the reactor was turned off*. Would you like to explain > that miracle? How much "full information" do we need to know that's > impossible? > > The pumps that feed the reactors cannot move as much water as claimed. > > The manual warns you not to use it in a partially empty pipe. > > The flowmeter is 80 mm in diameter (3"). The gravity return capacity of a > 3" pipe is 140 gpm: > > http://www.slideshare.net/raju175/water-flow-pipe-sizes > > Even assuming Rossi's flow rate was accurate (which is physically > impossible), Rossi reported the flow was 6 gpm, which is far less than the > pipe capacity, so the pipe would be mostly empty. Therefore the flow meter > cannot possibly work. > > A mostly empty gravity return pipe looks like this: > > http://benfranklinplumberhouston.com/images/blog/plumber-houston- > sewer-line-cleaning.jpg > > Peter Gluck believes no such thing exists, but anyone who has used pipes > and pumps will know this is how it looks. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument
An excellent paper kind of old friend- I remember when it was first discussed on the blog of my friend Daniele Passerini years before the trial and then once again in the Flowmeter scandal days when you, Jed. have claimed that a good flowmeter expert can convince the instrument to show one order of magnitude more flow than the real one. (now this is 4X) The results of the paper are perfectly plausible and the solution- scending pipe is simple and fine. The main differences to the Doral plant case: a) the paper describes an open flow not a circuit, the Plant has that ascending pipe b) the tests with errors are made when the flow is just starting, a professional test would let the flow for a few minutes when the parameters are established and constant- and only then to compare reading and effective flow. You do not measure the speed of flight during landing- start is anomalous in a way. However the Gioanola instructions are fine and have to be respected strictly being the same as those for the flowmeter used in the Plant. Now there are two cases possible in principle: A. Normal professional setup: RESERVOIR- PUMP-FLOWMETER-E-CATS: no systematic, significant errors possible B. Setup according to Jed FLOWMETER- RESERVOIR-PUMP- E-CATS- serious problems; doubtful if flowmeter works- erratic, inconstant, jumping readings due to air inclusions however not constant multiplier effect, incontrollable system. Errors- yes, scamming is much more difficult. BTW the same true for Luca Gamberale's calumny paper. Where in the LENR land are you now, caro Luca? peter On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is an article and some videos showing how a flow meter can installed > incorrectly: > > https://gsvit.wordpress.com/2016/04/19/how-to-overestimate-water-flux-by- > wrongly-positioning-an-instrument/ > > Figure 4 shows how to correct the problem. As far as I know, Rossi had > these same problems, and he did not install the kind of plumbing shown in > Fig. 4 that would fix them. > > The instructions for the meter are here: > > https://gsvit.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/istruzioni-per-la- > corretta-installazione-contatori-unico-e-multiplo.pdf > > Concluding sentence: > > N.B. Per mantenere il buon funzionamento dei componenti del contatore, si > raccomanda di assicurarsi che il contatore sia sempre pieno d'acqua (ad > eccezione di brevi periodi dovuti a manutenzione). > > Google translate: > > N.B. To maintain the proper functioning of the meter components, it is > recommended make sure that the counter is always full of water (except for > short periods due to maintenance). > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR comment and info
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-16-2017-lenr-comment-and-info.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:arrogant assassination attempt of LENR+ technology
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-15-2017-arrogant-assassination.html peaceful people should read it starting with NEWS peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR info and my cases of indecision
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-14-2017-lenr-some-info-plus-3-cases.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:the DeJAvu enclave
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-13-2017-lenr-opposed-to-rossi.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR LEARNING FROM GOING BEYOND LIMITS
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-12-2017-lenr-learning-from-going.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:biology inspired metaphor for LENR and NAE
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-11-2017-what-axolotl-can-do-but.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR praxeology. LENR "in situ"
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-10-2017-lenr-keywords-for-today.html -peter Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR+ technology- anthropomorphized?
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-09-2017-lenr-technology.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR INFO and an implicit appeal for the dignity of the Cold Fusion Community
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-08-2017-lenr-dark-side-of-repetitive.html I apologize for speaking about this situation but nobody IS the Community peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:better organ grinders management in LENR
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-07-2017-lenr-we-need-better-organ.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
[Vo]:LENR POLEMICS MODERATED
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-06-2017-lenr-polemics-moderato.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
