RE: Mandatory Vaccinations? Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-08-01 Thread Lawrence de Bivort
[John gave me his permission to re-post to the whole group the follow-up to
my earlier question to him regarding primary sources.}


I understand that a primary source for the assertion may not exist, which is
why I am asking for it. Much of what is sent around on the Net is invented
for pernicious purposes, and when one probes no more than one layer down,
proves itself to be such.

 
Does it not concern you that people will assume when you post something
that, short of a disclaimer on your part, you are endorsing these
assertions?  My sense is that one's credibility on-line is directly
connected to the quality of the comments we post.


Cheers,

Lawrence


From: John Berry [mailto:aethe...@gmail.com] 


Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 4:00 AM
To: debiv...@evolutionaryservices.org

Subject: Re: Mandatory Vaccinations? Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges
against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

 

Find a different one to take issue with, one to do with the current
situation.
I got some of it including that from:
http://www.rense.com/general86/whdo.htm

Though it has no more detail.

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Lawrence de Bivort
debiv...@evolutionaryservices.org wrote:

I love this stuff!

 

Let's take one assertion at random:  The WHO in 1985 documented that one of
its' primary goals for the use of a sterility vaccine disguised as a
smallpox vaccine was to eliminate 150 million excess Sub Saharan Africans.
(Fact, 1985-ongoing)

 

Please provide your primary source documentation for this assertion.
Thanks.





RE: Mandatory Vaccinations? Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-07-31 Thread Lawrence de Bivort
I love this stuff!

 

Let's take one assertion at random:  The WHO in 1985 documented that one of
its' primary goals for the use of a sterility vaccine disguised as a
smallpox vaccine was to eliminate 150 million excess Sub Saharan Africans.
(Fact, 1985-ongoing)

 

Please provide your primary source documentation for this assertion.
Thanks.

 

 

 

  _  

From: John Berry [mailto:aethe...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 9:45 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Mandatory Vaccinations? Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against
WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

 

The Vaccine exists and will soon be trialed (note: different versions will
exist!):

 
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/07/22/swine.flu.vaccine.trials/index.htm
l
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/07/22/swine.flu.vaccine.trials/index.html

 

 http://edition.cnn.com/2009/US/07/28/military.swine.flu/ WHO recommends
every country to make vaccine mandatory:

http://www.naturalnews.com/026723_health_vaccines_immune_system.html

 

Military will help:

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/US/07/28/military.swine.flu/

 

Obama believes in mandatory vaccinations:

One of the rallying parents, ...Ms. Liss said, Senator Obama, those people
rallying outside are with me. And we want to know if you will reform federal
vaccine policy. Will you come out to speak with us? 

 

His immediate and direct reply stunned Ms. Liss: I am not for selective
vaccination.

 

According to the Centers for Disease Control, there will be no exemptions.
A certain amount of human wastage is expected.

 

With the declaration earlier this month by the World Health Organization
(WHO) that the swine flu has reached pandemic Level 6 (they had to change
the definition of level 6 to make this determination work), a whole series
of bureaucratic prerogatives have been triggered, and local, state,
national, and international agencies have been further empowered. In the
U.S., all laws and conditions are now in place to see to it that you are
forced to be injected with the new swine flu vaccine, whether you want to
be or not. In the U.S., the government is now able to mandate universal mass
vaccinations at gunpoint.

 

According to the Centers for Disease Control, there will be no exemptions.
A certain amount of human wastage is expected.

 

3 Polish doctors and 6 nurses are facing murder charges 1. An informal
[e.g., illegal] clinical trial of the Avian Flu vaccine on about 200 Polish
vagrants resulted in 11 immediate deaths and an additional set of 20 later
deaths (approximately 15% of the test population). The doctors and nurses
involved were charged with murder. (Fact. 2008)

 

In another incident a Baxter product was found to be accidentally
contaminated.

Baxter International Inc. was in the process of applying for a contract to
provide Avian Flu vaccines to European countries in the event of an Avian
Flu epidemic. Its Austrian laboratory shipped Seasonal Flu vaccines to 18
countries in Europe. A laboratory technician tested the Baxter Seasonal Flu
vaccines sent to the Czech Republic on some ferrets killing them and
discovered that they were contaminated with a highly pathogenic version of
the Avian Flu, 72 Kilograms of it, although Level 3 precautions were in
place and such contamination could not have happened accidentally
according to experts in the field. No documentation of the destruction of
this highly infective material has been provided although the Austrian
Health Ministry insists that the deadly viral material was destroyed. (Fact
2008, 2009)

 

A WHO investigation into the Baxter contaminated vaccine issue resulted in
NO findings and in NO disciplinary actions. An Austrian investigation into
the same events yielded the same results. (Fact, 2009)

 

Baxter has been rewarded with a lead role in developing, producing and
disseminating the Swine Flu vaccine for the upcoming pandemic. (Fact, 2009)

 

Only 16 deaths initially:

Swine Flu was first identified to the public as a serious problem in
April/May 2009 when 168 persons in Mexico were confirmed by CDC and WHO to
have died from the Swine Flu. This number was later revised downward to only
16 deaths. (Fact, 2009)

 

The Philippine High Court convicted WHO (The World Health Organization) of
involuntarily sterilizing over 3 million Philippina women through the use of
vaccines. (Fact)

 

The WHO in 1985 documented that one of its' primary goals for the use of a
sterility vaccine disguised as a smallpox vaccine was to eliminate 150
million excess Sub Saharan Africans. (Fact, 1985-ongoing)

 

The WHO 5-shot vaccine programs for tetanus in third world countries in
South and Central America caused the involuntary sterilization of millions
of women. (Fact, ongoing)

 

Monsanto's MON 810 corn causes sterility according to studies published by
the Austrian Government. 

 

Monsanto's MON 810 corn contains the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus which, when
ingested, lowers the bodies CD 4 cells 

Re: Mandatory Vaccinations? Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-07-31 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence


John Berry wrote:
 *The Vaccine exists and will soon be trialed* (note: different versions
 will exist!):
 http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/07/22/swine.flu.vaccine.trials/index.html
 
 http://edition.cnn.com/2009/US/07/28/military.swine.flu/*WHO
 recommends every country to make vaccine mandatory*:
 http://www.naturalnews.com/026723_health_vaccines_immune_system.html

The leadin paragraph asserts that WHO recommends making it mandatory,
but none of the quotes from WHO people in body of the article support
the claim, nor do they make it sound even slightly plausible, as WHO is
saying there won't be enough for everybody anyway.

Mandatory seems to apply to the requirement that all countries make it
available, not that all individuals will be forced to accept it.

Ho, hum...



Re: Mandatory Vaccinations? Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-07-31 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence


John Berry wrote:

 *Military will help*:
 http://edition.cnn.com/2009/US/07/28/military.swine.flu/
 

They are clearly preparing for the *possibility* (unlikely as it seems)
of 1918-all-over-again.  If that were to happen, the military's help
would be needed and appreciated.

In Philadelphia the coffins were stacked by the curbs because there were
too few healthy gravediggers left to bury the bodies in a timely fashion
-- my father remembered it, though he was only 7 at the time.  It was a
mess.  A coordinated response including all available (military)
personnel might have helped.

One of the government's jobs is to try to prepare for stuff like that,
so that *if* it happens, they can do something useful about it.  (Their
lack of preparation for Katrina was an example of the *opposite* of what
they're supposed to do.)

And, it seems, one of the jobs of the press is to hysterically report
every move made by the government in such a situation as though (a) it
means we're about to have martial law and all freethinkers will be shot,
or (b) it means there is an imminent total disaster and the worst-case
scenario for which the gummint is preparing is actually the *most*
*likely* scenario.



Re: Mandatory Vaccinations? Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-07-31 Thread Steven Krivit

BB

*This* journalist nominates this thread for relocation elsewhere. Puhleeze.

SK



Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-30 Thread Jed Rothwell

John Berry wrote:

I absolutely believe that there have been many cases where vaccines 
kill more than they saved.


I have read many books about public health, and I know of no evidence 
for this assertion. Where did you get this information?



That is not the same as saying all vaccines have or that any one 
vaccine has (though I am not ruling it out) but yes I solidly 
believe that some applications of some vaccines have been 
mostly/entirely pointless and yet killed people.


If you solidly believe this, where is your solid evidence?


There are also arguments that most/all of the deaths from Spanish 
flu were the results of vaccines, a quick search pulls up this page 
which I have not read:

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf1.htmlhttp://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf1.html
No doubt many more exist on the subject.


There were no vaccines for influenza in 1918. Virology was just 
beginning, and the influenza virus was not discovered until much 
later. No doubt many web pages like this exist, but they have no 
scientific merit. You can find many web pages declaring that cold 
fusion does not exist, and others that claim evolution does not 
occur. Finding a web page or book with claim does not make the claim valid.


- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-29 Thread Jed Rothwell

John Berry wrote:

Short version, Swine Flu is not especially deadly and compared to 
the numbers killed by regular flu it isn't a concern . . .


Influenza is always a concern. It kills 30,000 to 50,000 people in a 
normal year, and ~200,000 when a relatively new variety appears. This 
one is likely to kill far more than the usual number, especially 
younger people. Fortunately it probably evolved from a human variety 
that went to pigs and then came back, so it is not too bad. A variety 
that humans have not been exposed to, such as the 1918 influenza, 
kills far more people. The 1918 epidemic killed roughly twice as many 
people as World War I did, including many more healthy young people 
than normal. The proximate cause of death was an allergic reaction 
that was far more powerful in healthy young people than elderly 
people. If the H1N1 virus has this same tendency, which still seems 
likely, it would be prudent to stock up unusually large numbers of vaccines.



According to the Centers for Disease Control, there will be no 
exemptions. A certain amount of human wastage is expected.


As Lawrence de Bivort pointed out, this is nonsense, and this message 
is propaganda.


I doubt any expert mentioned human wastage but all experts know 
that all vaccines always carry some risk. Indeed, all medical 
interventions of any kind have some level of risk, including 
treatment for hangnails. Every vaccine kills or disables some number 
of people, but the number is far lower than the number who would die 
without the vaccine. If you are at risk for serious influenza it is 
highly irrational not to get the vaccine. This is like saying you 
will drive 600 miles rather than taking an airplane because airplanes 
sometime crash. They do, of course, but the fatality rate per 
passenger mile is far lower than for cars.


I wasn't kidding about hangnails. You have to fill in medical forms 
saying you will not sue if the local anesthetic kills or disables you.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-29 Thread Edmund Storms
While what you say is true, Jed, not all vaccines are equally safe or  
effective, especially when it involves influenza.  In my case, I got a  
flu shot a few years ago and suffered from a sore shoulder for months  
and still got the flu. I find that certain natural immune enhances and  
antiviral potions work well and make the flu much easer to take.  The  
issue in the present case is the unproven effectiveness and safely of  
the vaccine because it is being rushed into production.  Personally, I  
would rather wait to see how many people suffer from the shot and how  
many people get the flu before I take the risk. Besides, I resent the  
government telling me to do anything because their advice is always  
bad in the long run.


Ed


On Jun 29, 2009, at 8:48 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:


John Berry wrote:

Short version, Swine Flu is not especially deadly and compared to  
the numbers killed by regular flu it isn't a concern . . .


Influenza is always a concern. It kills 30,000 to 50,000 people in a  
normal year, and ~200,000 when a relatively new variety appears.  
This one is likely to kill far more than the usual number,  
especially younger people. Fortunately it probably evolved from a  
human variety that went to pigs and then came back, so it is not too  
bad. A variety that humans have not been exposed to, such as the  
1918 influenza, kills far more people. The 1918 epidemic killed  
roughly twice as many people as World War I did, including many more  
healthy young people than normal. The proximate cause of death was  
an allergic reaction that was far more powerful in healthy young  
people than elderly people. If the H1N1 virus has this same  
tendency, which still seems likely, it would be prudent to stock up  
unusually large numbers of vaccines.



According to the Centers for Disease Control, there will be no  
exemptions. A certain amount of human wastage is expected.


As Lawrence de Bivort pointed out, this is nonsense, and this  
message is propaganda.


I doubt any expert mentioned human wastage but all experts know  
that all vaccines always carry some risk. Indeed, all medical  
interventions of any kind have some level of risk, including  
treatment for hangnails. Every vaccine kills or disables some number  
of people, but the number is far lower than the number who would die  
without the vaccine. If you are at risk for serious influenza it is  
highly irrational not to get the vaccine. This is like saying you  
will drive 600 miles rather than taking an airplane because  
airplanes sometime crash. They do, of course, but the fatality rate  
per passenger mile is far lower than for cars.


I wasn't kidding about hangnails. You have to fill in medical forms  
saying you will not sue if the local anesthetic kills or disables you.


- Jed





Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-29 Thread Jed Rothwell

Edmund Storms wrote:


While what you say is true, Jed, not all vaccines are equally safe or
effective, especially when it involves influenza.


Absolutely! The 1976 swine flu vaccines were spectacularly 
ineffective and dangerous.



Personally, I would rather wait to see how many people suffer from 
the shot and how many people get the flu before I take the risk.


That's wise but unfair. If everyone did what you are doing, no one 
would go first. You are letting other people act as guinea pigs, 
taking the risk for you, like collective food tasters. Since you -- 
Ed Storms -- are more valuable to society than most people, I 
approve, but it is ethically questionable.



Besides, I resent the government telling me to do anything because 
their advice is always bad in the long run.


That's a preposterous thing to say. Generally speaking, despite some 
well known exceptions, the U.S. government is one of the most 
knowledgeable, fair and effective organizations in history. 
Organizations such as the NIH and the CDC here in a Atlanta have made 
the largest and best contributions to public health in the world, bar 
none. The government directly invented or paid for most of the top 
technological breakthroughs of the 20th century in public health, and 
also for things such as aviation, lasers, computers and the Internet. 
It has done more for cold fusion than all private industry in the 
world combined.


Of course the DoE has been dysfunctional with regard to cold fusion, 
but nowhere near as dysfunctional as, say, General Motors, General 
Electric or Hitachi. These corporations should have invested hundreds 
of billions in cold fusion by now, but as far as I know they have 
done nothing.  People say they are only following the lead of the DoE 
and the APS, but they pay no attention to the DoE with regard to 
things like plasma fusion, so I do not think we can blame their 
inaction with regard to cold fusion on the DoE.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-29 Thread Edmund Storms


On Jun 29, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:


Edmund Storms wrote:


While what you say is true, Jed, not all vaccines are equally safe or
effective, especially when it involves influenza.


Absolutely! The 1976 swine flu vaccines were spectacularly  
ineffective and dangerous.



Personally, I would rather wait to see how many people suffer from  
the shot and how many people get the flu before I take the risk.


That's wise but unfair. If everyone did what you are doing, no one  
would go first. You are letting other people act as guinea pigs,  
taking the risk for you, like collective food tasters. Since you --  
Ed Storms -- are more valuable to society than most people, I  
approve, but it is ethically questionable.


That's an interesting approach to ethics.  Everyone has a choice to be  
first in line or to wait until the path is more clear.  For example,  
many serious operations had a high mortality
 rate initially. This was reduced by people choosing to be first,  
which allowed the mistakes to be corrected.  Are the people who  
waited, provided the affliction allowed a wait, unethical?



Besides, I resent the government telling me to do anything because  
their advice is always bad in the long run.


That's a preposterous thing to say. Generally speaking, despite some  
well known exceptions, the U.S. government is one of the most  
knowledgeable, fair and effective organizations in history.  
Organizations such as the NIH and the CDC here in a Atlanta have  
made the largest and best contributions to public health in the  
world, bar none. The government directly invented or paid for most  
of the top technological breakthroughs of the 20th century in public  
health, and also for things such as aviation, lasers, computers and  
the Internet. It has done more for cold fusion than all private  
industry in the world combined.


Here are a few of the bigger lies.

The government said that invading Iraq was necessary and people should  
join the military to protect the country. This was a lie and over 4000  
of the people who took this advice are dead and many more are  
handicapped for life.


The government said that people should spend as much as possible and  
they would get richer by taking out the equity in their homes by  
assuming larger mortgages. This was a lie and now many of these people  
are homeless.


The government has said that drilling for oil offshore and in the  
Alaska wilderness is the best way to solve the energy problem. This  
was a lie. Now we are in a no win situation where oil is too expensive  
for the average person and too cheap to justify further drilling.


It remains to be seen how many of the statements about the economic  
recovery are also lies.  Meanwhile people are investing as if a  
recovery is underway based on government information.  Even the  
claimed unemployment rate is a lie.


I could go on, but you can see that some really big lies, along with  
many smaller ones I have ignored, have been told. As for the US being  
 one of the most knowledgeable, fair and effective organizations in  
history, I need only remind you that it was the failure of the US  
government to control the financial system in the US that has caused  
the greatest loss of wealth in the history of mankind and the process  
is not finished. The consequences of this monumental incompetence are  
slowing developing and will be catastrophic.  The US government has  
some good points, but it also has some really bad characteristics. No  
government is perfect, but the evaluation must rest on how the actions  
of the government affect its citizens and the world.  The US  
government talks a good line, but its actions leave a lot to be  
desired.  But, I need to stop because this is politics and is a  
forbidden subject here.


Ed


Of course the DoE has been dysfunctional with regard to cold fusion,  
but nowhere near as dysfunctional as, say, General Motors, General  
Electric or Hitachi. These corporations should have invested  
hundreds of billions in cold fusion by now, but as far as I know  
they have done nothing.  People say they are only following the lead  
of the DoE and the APS, but they pay no attention to the DoE with  
regard to things like plasma fusion, so I do not think we can blame  
their inaction with regard to cold fusion on the DoE.


- Jed





Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-29 Thread Jed Rothwell

Edmund Storms wrote:


That's wise but unfair. If everyone did what you are doing, no one
would go first. You are letting other people act as guinea pigs,
taking the risk for you, like collective food tasters.


That's an interesting approach to ethics.  Everyone has a choice to be
first in line or to wait until the path is more clear.  For example,
many serious operations had a high mortality
 rate initially.


Ah, but with vaccines the situation is radically different. You get 
nearly all the benefit of the vaccine even when you do not take it. 
Because large numbers of other people are vaccinated your chances of 
getting the flu are reduced. US mortality from influenza is around 
50,000 per year as I mentioned. If there were no vaccines it would be 
in the hundreds of thousands. Vaccines only work as a firebreak 
because a large fraction of the population is willing to take them. 
Of course the people who get vaccinated also benefit directly since 
they are unlikely to get the disease.




Here are a few of the bigger lies.

The government said that invading Iraq was necessary and people should
join the military to protect the country.


I did not assert that the US government is without fault. Even if we 
confine the discussion to technology, I can list several dozen 
technologies supported by the government that went nowhere, such as 
oil shale and -- obviously -- plasma fusion.




The government said that people should spend as much as possible and
they would get richer by taking out the equity in their homes by
assuming larger mortgages. This was a lie and now many of these people
are homeless.


The government and the home loan industry both said this. The home 
loan industry not only said, many banks and other organizations went 
to extremes in lending, and failed to practice due diligence, for 
example when they lent large sums to dead people. The government did 
not do this. (These banks are nearly all bankrupt, or de facto 
bankrupt as is AIG.)




The government has said that drilling for oil offshore and in the
Alaska wilderness is the best way to solve the energy problem.


On the contrary, the government has opposed this. Industry has been 
saying this. I believe the government's opinion has prevailed so far: 
there is no offshore drilling in the Alaska wilderness.



It remains to be seen how many of the statements about the economic 
recovery are also lies.


That remains to be seen. Many experts say that compared to the 
situation in Japan in the 1990s, which started out similar to our 
situation, things seem promising.  I wouldn't know, but that is what 
K. Nishimura said the other day. He is the deputy director of the 
Bank of Japan and the top economist trained at Yale University. I 
suppose he would know.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-29 Thread OrionWorks
From Ed Storms:

 I could go on, but you can see that some really big lies,
 along with many smaller ones I have ignored, have been told.
 As for the US being  one of the most knowledgeable, fair
 and effective organizations in history, I need only remind
 you that it was the failure of the US government to control
 the financial system in the US that has caused the greatest
 loss of wealth in the history of mankind and the process
 is not finished. The consequences of this monumental
 incompetence are slowing developing and will be catastrophic.
 The US government has some good points, but it also has some
 really bad characteristics. No government is perfect, but the
 evaluation must rest on how the actions of the government
 affect its citizens and the world.  The US government talks
 a good line, but its actions leave a lot to be desired.  But,
 I need to stop because this is politics and is a forbidden
 subject here.

Like any government we do have our flaws. OTOH, there certainly are
worse places to live, considering the aftermath of recent elections in
a well known middle eastern country. If it wasn't for Twitter and
Facebook I wonder what we'd really know was going on over there.

Regarding discussions of forbidden subject material, particularly
politics, I personally doubt your alleged transgression will cause
another grass roots upwelling, an insurgency within the Vort
Collective resulting in new demands for elections. At worst, your
offense will be perceived as nothing more than an annoying rant by
certain Vort purists, while others more sympathetic will simply nod in
agreement.

Since he-who-shall-remain-nameless has been banned from posting his
one-sided political potshots within Vortex-l proper, it seems to me
that the occasional business of discussing religion and politics is in
the process of once again reestablishing itself, more or less, as a
necessary evil, an evil that helps clarify the complexities of the
world we live in.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-29 Thread John Berry
There are a number of things I disagree with (including Spanish flu) but the
only one i can be bothered with is your claim that it always helps more than
it harms.

In New Zealand there was a tainted polio vaccine and they knew it was but
used it anyway, I don't know how many died but my mother had 3 close friends
die.

And polio had not been a problem for years and never was, there is no reason
to believe it would have come back.


On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 John Berry wrote:

  Short version, Swine Flu is not especially deadly and compared to the
 numbers killed by regular flu it isn't a concern . . .


 Influenza is always a concern. It kills 30,000 to 50,000 people in a normal
 year, and ~200,000 when a relatively new variety appears. This one is likely
 to kill far more than the usual number, especially younger people.
 Fortunately it probably evolved from a human variety that went to pigs and
 then came back, so it is not too bad. A variety that humans have not been
 exposed to, such as the 1918 influenza, kills far more people. The 1918
 epidemic killed roughly twice as many people as World War I did, including
 many more healthy young people than normal. The proximate cause of death was
 an allergic reaction that was far more powerful in healthy young people than
 elderly people. If the H1N1 virus has this same tendency, which still seems
 likely, it would be prudent to stock up unusually large numbers of vaccines.


  According to the Centers for Disease Control, there will be no exemptions.
 A certain amount of human wastage is expected.


 As Lawrence de Bivort pointed out, this is nonsense, and this message is
 propaganda.

 I doubt any expert mentioned human wastage but all experts know that all
 vaccines always carry some risk. Indeed, all medical interventions of any
 kind have some level of risk, including treatment for hangnails. Every
 vaccine kills or disables some number of people, but the number is far lower
 than the number who would die without the vaccine. If you are at risk for
 serious influenza it is highly irrational not to get the vaccine. This is
 like saying you will drive 600 miles rather than taking an airplane because
 airplanes sometime crash. They do, of course, but the fatality rate per
 passenger mile is far lower than for cars.

 I wasn't kidding about hangnails. You have to fill in medical forms saying
 you will not sue if the local anesthetic kills or disables you.

 - Jed




Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-29 Thread John Berry
That is getting a bit too close to politics, I know because I wanted to make
a political reply regarding elections...

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:55 AM, OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.comwrote:

 From Ed Storms:

  I could go on, but you can see that some really big lies,
  along with many smaller ones I have ignored, have been told.
  As for the US being  one of the most knowledgeable, fair
  and effective organizations in history, I need only remind
  you that it was the failure of the US government to control
  the financial system in the US that has caused the greatest
  loss of wealth in the history of mankind and the process
  is not finished. The consequences of this monumental
  incompetence are slowing developing and will be catastrophic.
  The US government has some good points, but it also has some
  really bad characteristics. No government is perfect, but the
  evaluation must rest on how the actions of the government
  affect its citizens and the world.  The US government talks
  a good line, but its actions leave a lot to be desired.  But,
  I need to stop because this is politics and is a forbidden
  subject here.

 Like any government we do have our flaws. OTOH, there certainly are
 worse places to live, considering the aftermath of recent elections in
 a well known middle eastern country. If it wasn't for Twitter and
 Facebook I wonder what we'd really know was going on over there.

 Regarding discussions of forbidden subject material, particularly
 politics, I personally doubt your alleged transgression will cause
 another grass roots upwelling, an insurgency within the Vort
 Collective resulting in new demands for elections. At worst, your
 offense will be perceived as nothing more than an annoying rant by
 certain Vort purists, while others more sympathetic will simply nod in
 agreement.

 Since he-who-shall-remain-nameless has been banned from posting his
 one-sided political potshots within Vortex-l proper, it seems to me
 that the occasional business of discussing religion and politics is in
 the process of once again reestablishing itself, more or less, as a
 necessary evil, an evil that helps clarify the complexities of the
 world we live in.

 Regards
 Steven Vincent Johnson
 www.OrionWorks.com
 www.zazzle.com/orionworks




Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-29 Thread Jed Rothwell

John Berry wrote:

There are a number of things I disagree with (including Spanish flu) 
but the only one i can be bothered with is your claim that it always 
helps more than it harms.


I did not say that. On the contrary, I said there are some examples 
of spectacular failure such as the 1976 swine flu vaccine. Overall 
and in general, however, vaccines help FAR MORE often than they fail.


You have to be careful with assertions about safety and statistics. 
This stuff gets complicated. There are situations that are highly 
binary: nearly perfect safety or zero safety. Air travel safety is 
almost 100% assured but on rare occasions such as the Air France 
crash the other day a minor problem such as a plugged up Pitot gauge 
causes massive failure and 100% fatalities. It is hard to grasp that 
concept. (A Pitot tube is an example of 18th century technology still 
at work playing a major role on the most advanced machinery on 
earth.) Vaccinations are incredibly safe and effective and yet we can 
be certain that every year they will kill some small number of people.


Tricky statistical concepts like this often interfere with 
discussions of cold fusion. For example the notion that an effect 
should be reproducible gets all mixed up with the idea that it 
should work 100% of the time, even in the minds of professional 
scientists such as Garwin, on 60 Minutes. The two concepts are 
completely separate. In fact, 0.001 reproducibility would be fine, 
and totally convincing if you could conveniently repeat the 
experiment 1,000,000 times in one test, say with an array of 1000 x 
1000 microscopic test cells. This is why the BARC titanium chip test 
is convincing even though only one or two out of thousands of chips 
became radioactive. It even convinced Morrison, who witnessed the 
test, which is why he refused to say word about it.


Getting back to the example of vaccines, you can say it is a 100% 
reproducible effect that we will kill someone with a flu vaccine. It 
is a sure thing. And yet you don't need to worry about it personally. 
It is difficult to believe both those concepts at the same time. To 
give a nod example, even I am willing to buy a lottery ticket knowing 
full well that it has roughly as much chance of winning as the chance 
that a vaccine will kill me. It is irrational, but there it is.


On a related thought, consider how many people would be willing to 
buy a lottery ticket if it came with a binary award (two possible 
awards), both with typical 1 in 100 million odds: either you win $1 
billion or they take you out and shoot you. I'll bet no one would buy 
a ticket. Even though, of course, we face much worse odds driving a 
car a few miles on any highway, and the reward for driving on a 
highway on one trip is much smaller than $1 billion.



In New Zealand there was a tainted polio vaccine and they knew it 
was but used it anyway, I don't know how many died but my mother had 
3 close friends die.


Yes, this sort of thing happens. Just as airplanes sometimes crash 
despite our best effort to prevent it. No one should imagine that 
vaccines or any other medical technology is completely reliable or danger free.



And polio had not been a problem for years and never was, there is 
no reason to believe it would have come back.


Well, actually there is, but there shouldn't be. The problem should 
have been fixed decades ago, with the complete extinction of the 
virus as was done with smallpox. It is an incredible failure of world 
public health. Antibiotic resistant tuberculosis is even worse.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-29 Thread John Berry
I didn't read the second post from you when I wrote that, however you did
say: Every vaccine kills or disables some number of people, but the number
is far lower than the number who would die without the vaccine.

Since you have now said that that is not always the case I guess we can just
forget that.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:

 John Berry wrote:

  There are a number of things I disagree with (including Spanish flu) but
 the only one i can be bothered with is your claim that it always helps more
 than it harms.


 I did not say that. On the contrary, I said there are some examples of
 spectacular failure such as the 1976 swine flu vaccine. Overall and in
 general, however, vaccines help FAR MORE often than they fail.

 You have to be careful with assertions about safety and statistics. This
 stuff gets complicated. There are situations that are highly binary: nearly
 perfect safety or zero safety. Air travel safety is almost 100% assured but
 on rare occasions such as the Air France crash the other day a minor problem
 such as a plugged up Pitot gauge causes massive failure and 100% fatalities.
 It is hard to grasp that concept. (A Pitot tube is an example of 18th
 century technology still at work playing a major role on the most advanced
 machinery on earth.) Vaccinations are incredibly safe and effective and yet
 we can be certain that every year they will kill some small number of
 people.

 Tricky statistical concepts like this often interfere with discussions of
 cold fusion. For example the notion that an effect should be reproducible
 gets all mixed up with the idea that it should work 100% of the time, even
 in the minds of professional scientists such as Garwin, on 60 Minutes. The
 two concepts are completely separate. In fact, 0.001 reproducibility would
 be fine, and totally convincing if you could conveniently repeat the
 experiment 1,000,000 times in one test, say with an array of 1000 x 1000
 microscopic test cells. This is why the BARC titanium chip test is
 convincing even though only one or two out of thousands of chips became
 radioactive. It even convinced Morrison, who witnessed the test, which is
 why he refused to say word about it.

 Getting back to the example of vaccines, you can say it is a 100%
 reproducible effect that we will kill someone with a flu vaccine. It is a
 sure thing. And yet you don't need to worry about it personally. It is
 difficult to believe both those concepts at the same time. To give a nod
 example, even I am willing to buy a lottery ticket knowing full well that it
 has roughly as much chance of winning as the chance that a vaccine will kill
 me. It is irrational, but there it is.

 On a related thought, consider how many people would be willing to buy a
 lottery ticket if it came with a binary award (two possible awards), both
 with typical 1 in 100 million odds: either you win $1 billion or they take
 you out and shoot you. I'll bet no one would buy a ticket. Even though, of
 course, we face much worse odds driving a car a few miles on any highway,
 and the reward for driving on a highway on one trip is much smaller than $1
 billion.


  In New Zealand there was a tainted polio vaccine and they knew it was but
 used it anyway, I don't know how many died but my mother had 3 close friends
 die.


 Yes, this sort of thing happens. Just as airplanes sometimes crash despite
 our best effort to prevent it. No one should imagine that vaccines or any
 other medical technology is completely reliable or danger free.


  And polio had not been a problem for years and never was, there is no
 reason to believe it would have come back.


 Well, actually there is, but there shouldn't be. The problem should have
 been fixed decades ago, with the complete extinction of the virus as was
 done with smallpox. It is an incredible failure of world public health.
 Antibiotic resistant tuberculosis is even worse.

 - Jed




Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-29 Thread Jed Rothwell
John Berry wrote:


 I didn't read the second post from you when I wrote that, however you did
 say: Every vaccine kills or disables some number of people, but the number
 is far lower than the number who would die without the vaccine.

 Since you have now said that that is not always the case I guess we can
 just forget that.


You seem to be implying that in some cases vaccines do more harm than good.
That's not what I meant. There are spectacular failures in the sense that
some vaccines kill or disable more people than expected, and are withdrawn.
That's what happened with the 1976 swine flu vaccine. However, as far as I
know, there is no case in recorded history in which the vaccine actually
killed more people than it saved.

Other widely-used medical interventions in recent history have actually
killed more people than they helped. A good example is hormone replaced for
post-menopausal women. This was thought to be marginally beneficial but it
turned out be actually harmful. There is a huge debate about measuring the
effectiveness of medical treatments as part of the health care reforms. Many
treatments are marginal or questionable (possibly bad). However, public
health measures such as vaccination have much more clear-cut positive
effects.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-29 Thread John Berry
I absolutely believe that there have been many cases where vaccines kill
more than they saved.
That is not the same as saying all vaccines have or that any one vaccine has
(though I am not ruling it out) but yes I solidly believe that some
applications of some vaccines have been mostly/entirely pointless and yet
killed people.

That is my belief and I believe I could present more evidence of this but
honestly I have better things to put my attention on.

There are also arguments that most/all of the deaths from Spanish flu were
the results of vaccines, a quick search pulls up this page which I have not
read:
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf1.html
No doubt many more exist on the subject.

Personally I'd rather talk about physics/energy/antigravity.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 John Berry wrote:


 I didn't read the second post from you when I wrote that, however you did
 say: Every vaccine kills or disables some number of people, but the number
 is far lower than the number who would die without the vaccine.

 Since you have now said that that is not always the case I guess we can
 just forget that.


 You seem to be implying that in some cases vaccines do more harm than good.
 That's not what I meant. There are spectacular failures in the sense that
 some vaccines kill or disable more people than expected, and are withdrawn.
 That's what happened with the 1976 swine flu vaccine. However, as far as I
 know, there is no case in recorded history in which the vaccine actually
 killed more people than it saved.

 Other widely-used medical interventions in recent history have actually
 killed more people than they helped. A good example is hormone replaced for
 post-menopausal women. This was thought to be marginally beneficial but it
 turned out be actually harmful. There is a huge debate about measuring the
 effectiveness of medical treatments as part of the health care reforms. Many
 treatments are marginal or questionable (possibly bad). However, public
 health measures such as vaccination have much more clear-cut positive
 effects.

 - Jed




[Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-26 Thread John Berry
I don't think this can be considered political as no one votes for the UN or
WHO and it's a health warning not a discussion or about political view
points.

Short version, Swine Flu is not especially deadly and compared to the
numbers killed by regular flu it isn't a concern especially as large numbers
have been infected and recovered and like the normal flu it is only those
who have compromised immune systems that have died apparently.

Baxter, the company making a vaccine that will seemingly be forced on
people:

According to the Centers for Disease Control, there will be no exemptions.
A certain amount of human wastage is expected.

And They were recently caught putting live viruses in vaccines.
The ingredients of vaccines and risks associated with many are bad enough
but this looks very bad.

As the anticipated July release date for Baxter’s A/H1N1 flu pandemic
vaccine approaches, an Austrian investigative journalist is warning the
world that the greatest crime in the history of humanity is underway. Jane
Burgermeister has recently filed criminal charges with the FBI against the
World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations (UN), and several of the
highest ranking government and corporate officials concerning bioterrorism
and attempts to commit mass murder. She has also prepared an injunction
against forced vaccination which is being filed in America. These actions
follow her charges filed in April against Baxter AG and Avir Green Hills
Biotechnology of Austria for producing contaminated bird flu vaccine,
alleging this was a deliberate act to cause and profit from a pandemic.
Summary of claims and allegations filed with FBI in Austria on June 10, 2009

http://www.naturalnews.com/026503_pandemic_swine_flu_bioterrorism.html


Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-26 Thread Edmund Storms
How do they plan to enforce delivery of the vaccine?  Personally, the  
police would have to come to my door and restrain me.  How about you?


Ed
On Jun 26, 2009, at 4:20 PM, John Berry wrote:

I don't think this can be considered political as no one votes for  
the UN or WHO and it's a health warning not a discussion or about  
political view points.


Short version, Swine Flu is not especially deadly and compared to  
the numbers killed by regular flu it isn't a concern especially as  
large numbers have been infected and recovered and like the normal  
flu it is only those who have compromised immune systems that have  
died apparently.


Baxter, the company making a vaccine that will seemingly be forced  
on people:


According to the Centers for Disease Control, there will be no  
exemptions. A certain amount of human wastage is expected.


And They were recently caught putting live viruses in vaccines.
The ingredients of vaccines and risks associated with many are bad  
enough but this looks very bad.


As the anticipated July release date for Baxter’s A/H1N1 flu  
pandemic vaccine approaches, an Austrian investigative journalist is  
warning the world that the greatest crime in the history of humanity  
is underway. Jane Burgermeister has recently filed criminal charges  
with the FBI against the World Health Organization (WHO), the United  
Nations (UN), and several of the highest ranking government and  
corporate officials concerning bioterrorism and attempts to commit  
mass murder. She has also prepared an injunction against forced  
vaccination which is being filed in America. These actions follow  
her charges filed in April against Baxter AG and Avir Green Hills  
Biotechnology of Austria for producing contaminated bird flu  
vaccine, alleging this was a deliberate act to cause and profit from  
a pandemic.
Summary of claims and allegations filed with FBI in Austria on June  
10, 2009


http://www.naturalnews.com/026503_pandemic_swine_flu_bioterrorism.html




Re: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-26 Thread John Berry
I'd have already headed for the hills...

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:

 How do they plan to enforce delivery of the vaccine?  Personally, the
 police would have to come to my door and restrain me.  How about you?
 Ed

 On Jun 26, 2009, at 4:20 PM, John Berry wrote:

 I don't think this can be considered political as no one votes for the UN
 or WHO and it's a health warning not a discussion or about political view
 points.

 Short version, Swine Flu is not especially deadly and compared to the
 numbers killed by regular flu it isn't a concern especially as large numbers
 have been infected and recovered and like the normal flu it is only those
 who have compromised immune systems that have died apparently.

 Baxter, the company making a vaccine that will seemingly be forced on
 people:

 According to the Centers for Disease Control, there will be no exemptions.
 A certain amount of human wastage is expected.

 And They were recently caught putting live viruses in vaccines.
 The ingredients of vaccines and risks associated with many are bad enough
 but this looks very bad.

 As the anticipated July release date for Baxter’s A/H1N1 flu pandemic
 vaccine approaches, an Austrian investigative journalist is warning the
 world that the greatest crime in the history of humanity is underway. Jane
 Burgermeister has recently filed criminal charges with the FBI against the
 World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations (UN), and several of the
 highest ranking government and corporate officials concerning bioterrorism
 and attempts to commit mass murder. She has also prepared an injunction
 against forced vaccination which is being filed in America. These actions
 follow her charges filed in April against Baxter AG and Avir Green Hills
 Biotechnology of Austria for producing contaminated bird flu vaccine,
 alleging this was a deliberate act to cause and profit from a pandemic.
 Summary of claims and allegations filed with FBI in Austria on June 10,
 2009

 http://www.naturalnews.com/026503_pandemic_swine_flu_bioterrorism.html





RE: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

2009-06-26 Thread Lawrence de Bivort
This sounds like another run-of-the-mill scare-story to me.

 

1.  There is no 'forced-vaccination' program being proposed.
2.  The use of live virus in the making of vaccines is routine. Some
vaccines, like the Salk polio vaccine, is made with attenuated live virus.
These kinds of vaccines tend to be more effective than those containing
'dead' virus material, such as the Sabin polio vaccine.
3.  In any case, the UN does not mandate or not mandate health programs.
And, and among its many other activities, WHO only makes non-binding health
program recommendations to its member states.
4.  In any case, legal complaints such as the one 'described' here don't
ever get filed with the FBI. They are filed in court for adjudication, or
presented to a prosecutor's office for assessment.
5.  The FBI doesn't receive communications from Austrian national in
Austria. Any communications to the FBI by an Austrian in Austria would come
thought Austria's own police or judicial offices.

 

This story sounds like one of the many that circulate through the Net,
designed to scare folks and deliberately omitting the kinds of references
and citations that would enable people quickly to check its veracity. For
example, just who and when did the CDC make such a statement? If the writer
were sincere, it would have been a natural and necessary matter to include
such references.

 

In some, the whole thing appears to be nonsense, started by someone who
doesn't know much about how the real-world works nor much about vaccines,
and whose motives are probably to promote scandal and fear, and who assumes
that there are people out there who will be gullible enough to pass it on.

 

Lawrence

 

 

 

  _  

From: John Berry [mailto:aethe...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 6:20 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Journalist Files Charges against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism
and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

 

I don't think this can be considered political as no one votes for the UN or
WHO and it's a health warning not a discussion or about political view
points.

 

Short version, Swine Flu is not especially deadly and compared to the
numbers killed by regular flu it isn't a concern especially as large numbers
have been infected and recovered and like the normal flu it is only those
who have compromised immune systems that have died apparently.

 

Baxter, the company making a vaccine that will seemingly be forced on
people:

 

According to the Centers for Disease Control, there will be no exemptions.
A certain amount of human wastage is expected.

 

And They were recently caught putting live viruses in vaccines.

The ingredients of vaccines and risks associated with many are bad enough
but this looks very bad.

 

As the anticipated July release date for Baxter's A/H1N1 flu pandemic
vaccine approaches, an Austrian investigative journalist is warning the
world that the greatest crime in the history of humanity is underway. Jane
Burgermeister has recently filed criminal charges with the FBI against the
World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations (UN), and several of the
highest ranking government and corporate officials concerning bioterrorism
and attempts to commit mass murder. She has also prepared an injunction
against forced vaccination which is being filed in America. These actions
follow her charges filed in April against Baxter AG and Avir Green Hills
Biotechnology of Austria for producing contaminated bird flu vaccine,
alleging this was a deliberate act to cause and profit from a pandemic.

Summary of claims and allegations filed with FBI in Austria on June 10, 2009

 

http://www.naturalnews.com/026503_pandemic_swine_flu_bioterrorism.html