Re: [Vo]:the development of LENR must be accelerated!

2015-01-23 Thread Axil Axil
*I am always especially excited to see a laser based experiment that
produces highly reproducible LENR active results. As Peter points out in
this thread, these results are described in this experimental series
referenced in the paper as follows:*


 *http://www.currentscience.ac.in/php/forthcoming/CS-3.pdf
http://www.currentscience.ac.in/php/forthcoming/CS-3.pdf*


 *Highly reproducible LENR experiments using dual laser stimulation,*


 *When light is made to trigger positive LENR results, the LENR mechanism
is strictly Nanoplasmonic in nature.*


 *In 2002, Peter Hagelstein suggested that dual (red) lasers might be
effective in triggering excess power if operated in difference mode around
8 and 15 THz.*


 *I wonder why this theory wasn't developed further when the series of
nanoplasmonic experiments showed consistent reproducible results.*


 *If the nanoplasmonic trail was followed and developed further, if this
new field of study in science was not identified and studied further, this
shows a serious lack of problem solving technique on the part of leading
LENR theorists. *


 *Its only common sense...when we smell smoke in a house, you go from room
to room looking for the source. In scattered brain distraction, we don't
decide to take a walk in the woods because its a sunny day.*


 *Repeatable positive LENR experimental results are so rare and precious,
not even one can be ignored, everyone must be doggedly studied, with its
theoretical implications correlated relentlessly and tirelessly leading to
new experimental tests until the root of LENR causation is found. *


 *This lack of concentration on positive results is at the root of LENR's
theoretical failures. *







On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear Readers

 It is here:


 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/the-time-factor-in-our-universe-and-for.html

 Please excuse or ignore the complaining and focus on the good things!
 Peter

 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com



Re: [Vo]:the development of LENR must be accelerated!

2015-01-23 Thread Axil Axil
Reference:
Microbial transmutation of Cs-137 and LENR in growing biological systems

V. I. Vysotskii and A. A. Kornilova

There has been a long tradition of detecting LENR activity using changes in
the radiation output and change of radioactive isotope half-life in LENR
experimentation as an indicator of positive LENR activity over the decades
mostly used by Russian LENR researchers.

This LENR detection technique is more sensitive and less complicated than
the rigmarole that one must go through to show positive LENR activity using
excess heat.

I suggest that the upcoming MFMP Hot Cat and Piantelli replications add a
radioactive tracer to the fuel load so that a safe level of radioactive
tracer radiation is detected just outside of the reactor structure. When
the level of radiation falls, LENR is active.

It has recently been suggested that relativistic time dilatation regarding
subatomic particles plays a role in the LENR process. If true, this would
lead to a reduction of radiation levels produced by the radioactive isotope
tracer when the LENR process is active. This is a tried and true
experimental method to detect LENR activity. This LENR detection indicator
will be a more sensitive indicator to use in detecting very weak LENR
activity than will excess heat detection.

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:

  *I am always especially excited to see a laser based experiment that
 produces highly reproducible LENR active results. As Peter points out in
 this thread, these results are described in this experimental series
 referenced in the paper as follows:*


  *http://www.currentscience.ac.in/php/forthcoming/CS-3.pdf
 http://www.currentscience.ac.in/php/forthcoming/CS-3.pdf*


  *Highly reproducible LENR experiments using dual laser stimulation,*


  *When light is made to trigger positive LENR results, the LENR mechanism
 is strictly Nanoplasmonic in nature.*


  *In 2002, Peter Hagelstein suggested that dual (red) lasers might be
 effective in triggering excess power if operated in difference mode around
 8 and 15 THz.*


  *I wonder why this theory wasn't developed further when the series of
 nanoplasmonic experiments showed consistent reproducible results.*


  *If the nanoplasmonic trail was followed and developed further, if this
 new field of study in science was not identified and studied further, this
 shows a serious lack of problem solving technique on the part of leading
 LENR theorists. *


  *Its only common sense...when we smell smoke in a house, you go from
 room to room looking for the source. In scattered brain distraction, we
 don't decide to take a walk in the woods because its a sunny day.*


  *Repeatable positive LENR experimental results are so rare and precious,
 not even one can be ignored, everyone must be doggedly studied, with its
 theoretical implications correlated relentlessly and tirelessly leading to
 new experimental tests until the root of LENR causation is found. *


  *This lack of concentration on positive results is at the root of LENR's
 theoretical failures. *







 On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Dear Readers

 It is here:


 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/the-time-factor-in-our-universe-and-for.html

 Please excuse or ignore the complaining and focus on the good things!
 Peter

 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com





[Vo]:the development of LENR must be accelerated!

2015-01-23 Thread Peter Gluck
Dear Readers

It is here:

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/the-time-factor-in-our-universe-and-for.html

Please excuse or ignore the complaining and focus on the good things!
Peter

-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com