Re: Hydrino - orgone again :(

2006-05-22 Thread Frederick Sparber
Robin wrote.

 In reply to  Frederick Sparber's message of Sun, 21 May 2006
 08:50:42 -0600:
 Hi Fred,
 Cheer up, Robin.
 ElectrOpium to the rescue. :-)

 I thought that in the real world, they had already determined that
 ElectrOpium only had a lifetime of nanoseconds?

They have only detected the radiation from those that annihilate
or the radiation could be from the settling in binding energy
of the (*e-)  mass 2 to 2.7 electron mass particle which is a bit
tricky to detect. Both Allen Mills of UCR and the researchers
at Max Planck institute (and others) have been informed of
this possibility. No adverse responses there.Hence the jury is still out
until Ps- experiments are refined for (*e-) detection.

Fred.

Snip  [snip]
 Regards,

 Robin van Spaandonk

 http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

 Competition provides the motivation,
 Cooperation provides the means.





Hydrino - orgone again

2006-05-21 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
Hi,

According to Mills, the ionization energy of H[n=1/23] is 19.26
eV. For H[n=1/24] this is only 0.6945 eV, and for H[n=1/25] there
is no longer a hydride possible. Now suppose that as Jones has
suggested, hydrinos shrink in the Solar atmosphere over geologic
time, and get carried to the Earth on the Solar wind.
hydrinohydride being a negative ion might be loosely attached to
the positive end of a polar water molecule high in the atmosphere,
and come down as rain water. Because the ionization energy of
H[n=1/24] is less than that of water, it could be electrolyzed at
a lower voltage than water, and hence extracted as pure H[n=1/24],
without any other hydrinos (or even H2 or O2) being mixed in
(hence the claims that this is not electrolysis). Also, because
of the low ionization energy it would probably pass easily through
metals, picking up and losing an electron continually, just as
happens to metal atoms themselves. However because it is extremely
small, it could easily wander through the interstitial spaces in a
metal lattice during the moments that it is in its neutral state.
Even hydrogen atoms can manage this with some metals, and
H[n=1/24]hydride is both smaller and more easily ionized than H.

Once H[n=1/24] ends up in a car engine, and comes in contact with
either Ar+ or O++ in the plasma created by the spark, it can be
catalyzed to H[n=1/25] or H[n=1/26] releasing 8485 eV or 9178 eV
respectively during the very first shrinkage reaction. The
released energy serves to ionize more Ar and O creating more
catalyst ions, further catalyzing shrinkage.

Because the electrolysis process actually absorbs energy with
little or no hydrino shrinkage taking place, energy is not
liberated in the electrolysis cell at all, and the soft vacuum
causes it to cool.

These well shrunken hydrinos don't last long in the environment,
and so are best harvested directly from a rain storm during and
shortly after the Solar wind from Solar flares or CMEs has
impinged on the Earth's atmosphere. (Hence the various anecdotal
claims that it's the water that matters).

This also explains the source of purported excess power reported
by the Graneau's.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

Competition provides the motivation,
Cooperation provides the means.



RE: Hydrino - orgone again

2006-05-21 Thread Frederick Sparber
Get the same results with Ubiquitous Electronium (mass 2x Electron) (*e-)
especially in Argon-40 and rainwater, Robin.  :-)

Fred


 [Original Message]
 From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Date: 5/21/2006 12:55:15 AM
 Subject: Hydrino - orgone again

 Hi,

 According to Mills, the ionization energy of H[n=1/23] is 19.26
 eV. For H[n=1/24] this is only 0.6945 eV, and for H[n=1/25] there
 is no longer a hydride possible. Now suppose that as Jones has
 suggested, hydrinos shrink in the Solar atmosphere over geologic
 time, and get carried to the Earth on the Solar wind.
 hydrinohydride being a negative ion might be loosely attached to
 the positive end of a polar water molecule high in the atmosphere,
 and come down as rain water. Because the ionization energy of
 H[n=1/24] is less than that of water, it could be electrolyzed at
 a lower voltage than water, and hence extracted as pure H[n=1/24],
 without any other hydrinos (or even H2 or O2) being mixed in
 (hence the claims that this is not electrolysis). Also, because
 of the low ionization energy it would probably pass easily through
 metals, picking up and losing an electron continually, just as
 happens to metal atoms themselves. However because it is extremely
 small, it could easily wander through the interstitial spaces in a
 metal lattice during the moments that it is in its neutral state.
 Even hydrogen atoms can manage this with some metals, and
 H[n=1/24]hydride is both smaller and more easily ionized than H.

 Once H[n=1/24] ends up in a car engine, and comes in contact with
 either Ar+ or O++ in the plasma created by the spark, it can be
 catalyzed to H[n=1/25] or H[n=1/26] releasing 8485 eV or 9178 eV
 respectively during the very first shrinkage reaction. The
 released energy serves to ionize more Ar and O creating more
 catalyst ions, further catalyzing shrinkage.

 Because the electrolysis process actually absorbs energy with
 little or no hydrino shrinkage taking place, energy is not
 liberated in the electrolysis cell at all, and the soft vacuum
 causes it to cool.

 These well shrunken hydrinos don't last long in the environment,
 and so are best harvested directly from a rain storm during and
 shortly after the Solar wind from Solar flares or CMEs has
 impinged on the Earth's atmosphere. (Hence the various anecdotal
 claims that it's the water that matters).

 This also explains the source of purported excess power reported
 by the Graneau's.

 Regards,

 Robin van Spaandonk

 http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

 Competition provides the motivation,
 Cooperation provides the means.





Hydrino - orgone again :(

2006-05-21 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
Hi,

Oops! - H[n=1/24]hydride is an even better alkali metal than the
real alkali metals, so it isn't just going to sit quietly in a
water molecule, it's going to reduce the hydrogen, and very
quickly at that!

Consequently, this whole scenario doesn't work. To compound the
error, the energies I calculated were total shrinkage energies,
not just for the next step. They should have been 666 eV for Ar+
and 1360 eV for O++.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

Competition provides the motivation,
Cooperation provides the means.



Re: Hydrino - orgone - or Special-K?

2006-05-21 Thread Jones Beene

Robin


They should have been 666 eV for Ar+  and 1360 eV for O++.



These energies are in the range seen in efficient radiation but 
the total fit into the Chandra data - is better for an Auger 
Cascade involving  C/O/Fe atoms, wherein there are known steps 
of radiation, and at definite ratios coming from the primary heavy 
elements which we know to be in comets.


In trying to tailor the earthbound scenario into Mill's CQM 
methodology of further shrinkage, and ignoring the possibility 
that the energy is really coming from ZPE via the hydrino (as an 
*inactive* intermediary, or agent), one can avoid the negative 
baggage of ZPE... and Puthoff's work ... which Mills' has admitted 
to dislike. But Mills stubbornness may lead down the path which is 
not the one where the (minuscule amount of good) evidence is now 
pointing us. He has chosen the all-or-none route.


However, the alternative viewpoint becomes this bastard, 
anti-Ockham jump - which suggests that neither of these two 
controversial theorists is fully correct, but neither are 
incorrect either, and Mill's got the hydrino part right and 
Puthoff got the ZPE-electron-orbital part correct, and that the 
two explanations (as disparate and anti-mainstream as they may 
sound at first) are a match made in ... well, if not in heaven, 
then at least in the Valis supercomputer g.


It is two bad that these two modern day geniuses, Mills and 
Puthoff, absolutely detest each other's work, theory and logic - 
as the best answer to solving the riddle, may lie in an 
amalgamation of the two theories (with a little help from their 
friends).


I take it from your past posts, Robin, that you also lean heavily 
against Puthoff and ZPE... and in truth, it is difficult to make 
that necessary leap of combining two controversial layers (of 
unproven assumptions) in a situation where either one gets its 
full share of scorn from the mainstream. OTOH, the contrarian 
might say that in this case, the more scorn the better, as the 
mainstream has totally ignored two half-truths, despite the 
evidence... and (very rarely) it is only in combining half-truths 
that leads us down the true path (not to get too Taoistic).


It seems to me that to make the earthbound OU process viable, 
wherein the hydrino is potentially a player (and given that 
there is such a primordial population of solar-derived hydrinos) 
we need to be dealing with only those hydrinos near the maximum 
enthalpy, maximum inertness, and maximum compatibility with the 
host.


In the case of heavy-Argon - as a host - this must mean that the 
IP of the hydrinohydride matches the IP of a k-shell electron 
which it is to replace. When in the comet, where there is little 
Argon, this hydrino species may be in a transitory fit where it 
is not in resonance, whereas when it reaches the oceans of earth, 
and encounters the potassium molecule, it finds such a resonance 
and home. The result: Special-K an ersatz heavy-Argon, of 
apparent molecular weight of just over 40 (two extra electrons in 
total but the outer shell still has the normal 8).


Jones




RE: Hydrino - orgone again :(

2006-05-21 Thread Frederick Sparber
Cheer up, Robin.
ElectrOpium to the rescue. :-)

(*e-) mass = 2* 9.1e-31 kg
First orbit (v = c/137) R =  0.5 * 5.29e-11 
1st  = -27.2  eV
2nd = - 109 eV
3rd = -245 eV
4th = -436 eV
5th = -681 eV
6th = -981 eV
7th = -1335 eV
8th = -1744 eV
9th = - 2207 eV
10th = - 2725 eV naturally
100th = - 272,575 eV super-naturally or poppycock? 

Fred

Robin wrote:

 Hi,

 Oops! - H[n=1/24]hydride is an even better alkali metal than the
 real alkali metals, so it isn't just going to sit quietly in a
 water molecule, it's going to reduce the hydrogen, and very
 quickly at that!

 Consequently, this whole scenario doesn't work. To compound the
 error, the energies I calculated were total shrinkage energies,
 not just for the next step. They should have been 666 eV for Ar+
 and 1360 eV for O++.

 Regards,

 Robin van Spaandonk

 http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

 Competition provides the motivation,
 Cooperation provides the means.





RE: Hydrino - orgone again :(

2006-05-21 Thread Frederick Sparber

 ElectrOpium to the rescue. :-)
Or as they would say down Texas way:

ElectRopium to the rescue. Right Richard?

137th =  1737^2 * 27.2 =  - 0.511 MeV  too.

 [Original Message]
 From: Frederick Sparber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Date: 5/21/2006 8:51:45 AM
 Subject: RE: Hydrino - orgone again :(

 Cheer up, Robin.
 ElectrOpium to the rescue. :-)

 (*e-) mass = 2* 9.1e-31 kg
 First orbit (v = c/137) R =  0.5 * 5.29e-11 
 1st  = -27.2  eV
 2nd = - 109 eV
 3rd = -245 eV
 4th = -436 eV
 5th = -681 eV
 6th = -981 eV
 7th = -1335 eV
 8th = -1744 eV
 9th = - 2207 eV
 10th = - 2725 eV naturally
 100th = - 272,575 eV super-naturally or poppycock? 

 Fred

 Robin wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  Oops! - H[n=1/24]hydride is an even better alkali metal than the
  real alkali metals, so it isn't just going to sit quietly in a
  water molecule, it's going to reduce the hydrogen, and very
  quickly at that!
 
  Consequently, this whole scenario doesn't work. To compound the
  error, the energies I calculated were total shrinkage energies,
  not just for the next step. They should have been 666 eV for Ar+
  and 1360 eV for O++.
 
  Regards,
 
  Robin van Spaandonk
 
  http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
 
  Competition provides the motivation,
  Cooperation provides the means.







RE: Hydrino - orgone again :(

2006-05-21 Thread Frederick Sparber
Relativistic Effects:

Relativistic Gamma = E(kin)/Eo + 1  = 1/[1- (v^2/c^2)]^1/2

At 137th, 137^2 * 27.2 = .511 MeV  

Gamma = [.511E6/1.0E6] + 1 = 1.5

At 100th  (-272,575 eV) 

Gamma = [272,575/1.0E6] + 1 = 1.2725

At 24th Fractional Orbit

Gamma = [69,696/1.0E6] + 1 =  1.0697

About Maximum?
 
  (*e-) mass = 2* 9.1e-31 kg
  First orbit (v = c/137) R =  0.5 * 5.29e-11 
  1st  = -27.2  eV
  2nd = - 109 eV
  3rd = -245 eV
  4th = -436 eV
  5th = -681 eV
  6th = -981 eV
  7th = -1335 eV
  8th = -1744 eV
  9th = - 2207 eV
  10th = - 2725 eV naturally
  100th = - 272,575 eV super-naturally or poppycock? 
 





Re: Hydrino - orgone again :(

2006-05-21 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to  Frederick Sparber's message of Sun, 21 May 2006
08:50:42 -0600:
Hi Fred,
Cheer up, Robin.
ElectrOpium to the rescue. :-)

I thought that in the real world, they had already determined that
ElectrOpium only had a lifetime of nanoseconds?
[snip]
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

Competition provides the motivation,
Cooperation provides the means.



Re: Hydrino - orgone - or Special-K?

2006-05-21 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Sun, 21 May 2006 07:27:19
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
I take it from your past posts, Robin, that you also lean heavily 
against Puthoff and ZPE...

No, I think that is a too negative representation. I'm looking for
something that is both self consistent, and consistent with
observed phenomena. I can't yet say that I have found it in
anyone's theory (including my own).  :( 

One of my main complaints about Hal's theory is, as I said to him
years ago, that if the Universe is full of energetic photons up to
1E43 Hz, then why aren't at least half of all atoms constantly
ionized? (Most of the energy resides in the high end photons, so
the average is way higher than the energy required to ionize an
atom).

It's as though the photons don't act like normal photons. Which
is what led me to ask him if they could be standing (stationary if
you prefer) waves ( a la Beardon). He replied at the time that the
equations would all be the same if they were.

(Beardon talks about pairs of waves going in opposite directions,
which IMO is the same thing as stationary waves).

BTW Ross Tessien also seems to be into stationary waves (or was at
one time anyway).

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

Competition provides the motivation,
Cooperation provides the means.



Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-03 Thread Frederick Sparber



Water powered cars/ inventors.Andriah Puharich Archie blue Bob Boyce Carl Cella Charles H. Garrett Daniel Dingel Hector Pierre Vaes Nakamatsu Yoshiro Sam Leslie Leach Stanley Meyer Steven Horvarth The Joe Cell.

- Original Message - 
From: Frederick Sparber 
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: 5/2/2006 7:38:05 PM 
Subject: Re: Hydrino orgone

If the "tail wags the dog" concept of the motion
of the electron cloud causing the atoms-molecules
to erratically move about (which apparently is the foundation 
of Avogadro's Law) holds,and add that to the concept of
low pressure of a soft vacuum allowing atoms-molecules
to literally expand as in the Joe Cell. one might conclude
that a water "Vacuum Expander" tank would
replace the Joe Cell. 
A pool of water inaused refrigerant or propane tank with a hose to the intake manifold
with some gas from a small propane torch (or ether spray) let into the air 
intake for a "Pilot Fuel".
In the cylinder the atoms-molecules shrink normal size, giving
off energy.

Fred


Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-02 Thread Frederick Sparber



A bit of a problem mit der joe cell? :-)

http://www.sdsefi.com/techtheo.htm

"The '70s saw the introduction of the excellent L Jetronic system and licensed spinoffs built in other countries. Emission regulations and the energy crisis in the mid '70s caused most car manufacturers to consider the switch to EFI. Nissan, Toyota and BMW notably equipped almost all of their higher end models with the Bosch system by 1982.
Many German and American car companies were slow to embrace EFI for reasons unknown. By 1985, the first digital systems were in widespread use worldwide by most manufacturers to some degree and the days of the carburetor were numbered. Today, over 95% of all cars produced are EFI equipped. EFI is certainly not new, as its roots were firmly established over 30 years ago."

Basic Theory

"EFI uses solenoid valves called injectors to meter fuel delivery. Most vehicles today use 1 injector per cylinder. When the solenoid is energized, fuel sprays out into the valve port. Fuel is delivered to the injector by a high pressure electric pump at around 40 psi. Fuel delivery is controlled by the injectors which are cycled by the computer. The computer produces a signal to open the injectors for a certain length of time depending on engine conditions relayed by sensors. The longer that the injector is open, the more fuel is injected. As engine load and rpm are increased, the injector open times are increased to match increasing airflow. This computer output signal is called the injector pulse width. The longer the pulse width, the more fuel is injected."




- Original Message - 
From: Frederick Sparber 
To: vortex-l
Sent: 5/1/2006 7:45:39 PM 
Subject: Re: Hydrino orgone



Posted earlier:

 IOW. The "Joe Cell" may turn out to be a Red Herring.

I meant it may not need to produce O, OH, and H, H2 or H3O,
but, the electrolysis heat from the battery may provide the heat 
for vaporizing the water, 

SATURATED STEAM TABLE CALCULATOR: (and more)

http://www.connel.com/cgi-bin/steam.pl


Why rack your brain? :-)

Fred

- Original Message - 
From: Frederick Sparber 
To: vortex-l
Sent: 5/1/2006 6:19:57 PM 
Subject: Re: Hydrino orgone

Let's find out if nature's thermodynamics allows an engine 
to run on damp air created by using the evaporative cooling
effect (Venturi aspiration on water) on the incoming air, and 
using the 4 cycle engine to optimize the INVERSION TEMPERATURE
so that during the power stroke the EXPANDING GAS HEATS.
IOW. The "Joe Cell" may turn out to be a Red Herring.

USE THIS PSYCH CHART:

http://www.linric.com/webpsysi.htm


The Inversion Temperature:
" the 'normal' effect of cooling when a gas expands takes place below that temperature, 
above that temperature it heats under expansion."

Gas Inversion Temp Deg K
Space 0-3
Helium 51
Hydrogen 205 -90.67 F
Neon 242
Nitrogen 621 658.13 F
Argon 723 841.73 F
Krypton 727
Oxygen893 1147.73Xenon 1427 

Zero Deg C = 273 Deg K
Zero Deg F = 255 Deg K

Conversion calculators.

http://www.onlineconversion.com/temperature.htm

Fred

Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-02 Thread Frederick Sparber


Making a Mountain out of a Molehill? :-)

http://www.tiscover.at/at/guide/50116at,en,SCH1/objectId,ACC296274at,curr,EUR,season,at1,selectedEntry,pict/pict.html

"In a mountain scenery, yet close to the Wolfgangsee lake! The Kleefeld Alpine inn is at about 2.5 km from the Wolfgangsee lake at 700 m altitude. Amidst mountain peaks, Alpine pastures and forests, located on a south-facing sheltered from the wind, you can enjoy unspoilt nature. Hikes to the lakeside or along steep ways up to the Sparber mountain, it´s your choice! "

Anybody feel like Yodeling. :-)


Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-02 Thread Frederick Sparber


If the "tail wags the dog" concept of the motion
of the electron cloud causing the atoms-molecules
to erratically move about (which apparently is the foundation
of Avogadro's Law) holds,and add that to the concept of
low pressure of a soft vacuum allowing atoms-molecules
to literally expand as in the Joe Cell. one might conclude
that a water "Vacuum Expander" tank would
replace the Joe Cell. 
A pool of water inaused refrigerant or propane tank with a hose to the intake manifold
with some gas from a small propane torch (or ether spray) let into the air 
intake for a "Pilot Fuel".
In the cylinder the atoms-molecules shrink normal size, giving
off energy.

Fred


Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-01 Thread Frederick Sparber


Fluorescent lamps have an Argon fill pressure of ~ 3 to 5 Torr:

http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6683407-description.html

If there are any low-pressure/vacuum-induced (Casimir-ZPE) heat effects, they
should show up when a lamp is first lit.
Charge a capacitor to a few KV and dump it into a fluorescent bulb
blackened with spray paint, and placed inside a water-filled PVC pipe "calorimeter"?

Hooked up as the negative resistance discharge load of a relaxation oscillator?

Which way will the orgone flow?

Fred

Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-01 Thread Frederick Sparber



A standard 4 foot (122 cm long) T-12 1.5 inch (3.8 cm diameter) fluorescent
bulb at5 Torr Argon pressure should contain ~ 2.46e20 Argon atoms.
or ~0.025eV /atom with a 1.0 joule energy input. pulse.
About the same eV/atom at 300 degrees Kambienttemperature.
Sounds a bit like the PAGD doesn't it?
There could be H2O vapor in the bulb already?

- Original Message - 
From: Frederick Sparber 
To: vortex-l
Sent: 5/1/2006 2:24:41 AM 
Subject: Re: Hydrino orgone

Fluorescent lamps have an Argon fill pressure of ~ 3 to 5 Torr:

http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6683407-description.html

If there are any low-pressure/vacuum-induced (Casimir-ZPE) heat effects, they
should show up when a lamp is first lit.
Charge a capacitor to a few KV and dump it into a fluorescent bulb
blackened with spray paint, and placed inside a water-filled PVC pipe "calorimeter"?

Hooked up as the negative resistance discharge load of a relaxation oscillator?

Which way will the orgone flow?

Fred

Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-01 Thread Frederick Sparber



Papp Engine vs PAGD:

http://www.aetherometry.com/papp_engine.html

"Both systems employ a sudden (and catastrophic) electric discharge. Papp followed the model of the internal combustion (IC) engine, with the high-pressure spark igniting the inert gas fuel. In the PAGD, the 'spark' consists of a diachronic cluster of auto-electronic emission sites that fail to sustain a vacuum-arc. The electric discharge is not accessory, as it is in the Papp technology; rather, it is constitutive of the technology by its physical characteristics, including the autogenous pulsation. It is, in fact, the method whereby the 'vacuum-state' is tapped. The PAGD discharge is a low field auto-electronic emission that directly generates the electron plasma from a cathode that can be treated as fuel [9]. This has a deep parallel with the Papp engine, where the explosion is, in our view, driven by the formation of an electron plasma emitted from the inert gas mixture - which must thus be treated as the fuel proper (see below). The basis for th!
 e presence of anomalous cathode reaction forces in the Papp combustion, stems, in our view, entirely from the (quasi-solid) conditions that permit autoelectronic emission from inert gases. "


I sure backed into that one. :-)

Fred

- Original Message - 
From: Frederick Sparber 
To: vortex-l
Sent: 5/1/2006 3:22:57 AM 
Subject: Re: Hydrino orgone


A standard 4 foot (122 cm long) T-12 1.5 inch (3.8 cm diameter) fluorescent
bulb at5 Torr Argon pressure should contain ~ 2.46e20 Argon atoms.
or ~0.025eV /atom with a 1.0 joule energy input. pulse.
About the same eV/atom at 300 degrees Kambienttemperature.
Sounds a bit like the PAGD doesn't it?
There could be H2O vapor in the bulb already?

Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-01 Thread Frederick Sparber


In the words of James Burke's, "Connections".

The Inversion Temperature:
" the 'normal' effect of cooling when a gas expands takes place below that temperature, 
above that temperature it heats under expansion."

Gas Inversion Temp Deg K
Space 0-3
Helium 51
Hydrogen 205 -90.67 F
Neon 242
Nitrogen 621 658.13 F
Argon 723 841.73 F
Krypton 727
Oxygen893 1147.73Xenon 1427 

Zero Deg C = 273 Deg K
Zero Deg F = 255 Deg K

Handy Conversion calculators.

http://www.onlineconversion.com/temperature.htm

Fred

Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-01 Thread Mark Jordan

There is this patent that can be related:

http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat3781601.pdf

MJ


On 1 May 2006 at 2:23, Frederick Sparber wrote:

 
 Fluorescent lamps have an Argon fill pressure of ~ 3 to 5 Torr:
 
 http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6683407-description.html
 
 If there are any low-pressure/vacuum-induced (Casimir-ZPE) heat effects, they
 should show up when a lamp is first lit.
 Charge a capacitor to a few KV and dump it into a fluorescent bulb
 blackened with spray paint, and placed inside a water-filled PVC pipe 
 calorimeter?
 
 Hooked up as the negative resistance discharge load of a relaxation 
 oscillator?
 
 Which way will the orgone flow?
 
 Fred





Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-01 Thread Frederick Sparber
Mark Jordan wrote.

   There is this patent that can be related:

   http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat3781601.pdf

   MJ

Thanks Mark.  An interesting way to boost luminous efficiency
but no direct info on OU heat without running an experiment.

If you compare #18 table I (22.33 watts input) and Table II
lamp  #18 (10.90 watts input) he is using 33.23 watts and a
bunch of lamps to get that boost. No?

Fred

 On 1 May 2006 at 2:23, Frederick Sparber wrote:

  
  Fluorescent lamps have an Argon fill pressure of ~ 3 to 5 Torr:
  
  http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6683407-description.html
  
  If there are any low-pressure/vacuum-induced (Casimir-ZPE) heat
effects, they
  should show up when a lamp is first lit.
  Charge a capacitor to a few KV and dump it into a fluorescent bulb
  blackened with spray paint, and placed inside a water-filled PVC pipe
calorimeter?
  
  Hooked up as the negative resistance discharge load of a relaxation
oscillator?
  
  Which way will the orgone flow?
  
  Fred







Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-01 Thread Jones Beene
- Original Message - 
From: Mark Jordan



There is this patent that can be related:


http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat3781601.pdf


And ... check out the rather amazing claim on page 65 of this 
document, 2/3 down the left column. That would be clearly 
overunity yet... this patent has been around for 35 years now and 
Imris is not exactly a houshold word - nor is the technique is 
general use, which it should be if it were true - and with patents 
expired and many companies desirous to save power on lighting 
strange.


Mark has commented on this on Keeleynet but they are using the 
substandard eScribe server and very little will come up.


But further - and on a curious (and convoluted note) the assignee: 
Ecotrol - is now apparently a trademark of the EcoSmart company in 
Tennessee, among whose many patents for pesticides are quite a few 
under the name of Paul Sprain, who apparently has switched his 
focus these days to magnetic overunity. At any rate, he seems to 
be quite the ecologist and creative genius - but certainly not a 
publicity seeker... and there is no reason to believe that there 
is anything other than a coincidental connection of these similar 
names.


Jones



Imris patent 3,781,601 -  Inv: Pavel Imris, West Haven, Conn. 
Assigned to: Ecotrol, Inc.  Md,


Describing the circuit on page 6...the face of the electrode can 
be any
desired shape.  However, a conical point of 60 degrees has been 
found to  be satisfactory and it is believed to have an influence 
on the

efficiency of the generator.

In addition, the type of gas selected for used in the tube 26 as 
well as
the pressure of the gas in the tube also effect the efficiency of 
the

generator, and, in turn, the efficiency of electrical circuit.

Across a single fluorescent lamp, the voltage is 60 V and the 
current  is 0.1818 A; therefore the input energy to the lamp 42 is 
10.90 W.  The  output of the fluorescent lamp is 3,200 lumens 
which represent 8.8 W  power of light energy.  Thus, the one 
fluorescent lamp is operating at  80.7 percent efficiency under 
these conditions.


In Fig 3, still another embodiment of the optical 
electrostatic
generator 20b is shown.  The generator is also particularly 
useable in a circuit  including electrostatic particle 
precipitation in air pollution control  devices, chemical 
synthesis in electrical discharge systems such as  ozone 
generators, and charging means for high voltage generators of the 
Van de Graff type, as well as particle accelerators.


However, when the optical generator is the same as described 
for Test No  18 and there are 100 fluorescent lamps in series in 
the circuit, the  total power input is 227.7 watts for the optical 
generator and 1,090  watts for 100 fluorescent lamps or a total of 
1,318 watts.  The total  power input normally required to operate 
the 100 fluorescent lamps in a  normal circuit would be 40 watts 
times 100 or 4,000 watts.  Thus, by  using the optical generator 
in the circuit, about 2,680 watts of energy  are saved.


It was already 80% efficient, we are told and yet now the power 
input has been reduced to a third of the previous power indication 
a COP of at least 2.4


At higher pressures, the device deffinitely becomes Over Unity in 
the claims.  For instance, with  a Xenon filled tube at 5,000 torr 
in a series circuit with 100 40 Watt  flouresent lamps (with a 
single wire going to each end of each lamp),  the optical 
generator pulls 332 Watts, with each lamp pulling 9 tenths  Watt 
(at 5 Volts) for 3,200 lumens output (8.8 Watts) per tube - giving 
a total for the circuit of 880 Watts output for 442 Watts input.


Hmmm something doesn't add up here, no? 



Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-01 Thread Frederick Sparber


A "Remanufactured" 12 volt lead-acid battery seems like
an easier/cheaper way to make a "Joe Cell". The charged 12 volt
utility batteries used in lawn mowers etc usually sell for $25.00 if
you don't have a trade-in. But you would have to flush out
the electrolyte using baking soda to neutralize the sulfuric acid.

Lead Acid Battery Recycling Info:

http://www.lead-battery-recycling.com/lead-battery-recycling.html

Good Pix too.

Fred

Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-01 Thread Frederick Sparber


Let's find out if nature's thermodynamics allows an engine 
to run on damp air created by using the evaporative cooling
effect (Venturi aspiration on water) on the incoming air, and 
using the 4 cycle engine to optimize the INVERSION TEMPERATURE
so that during the power stroke the EXPANDING GAS HEATS.
IOW. The "Joe Cell" may turn out to be a Red Herring.

USE THIS PSYCH CHART:

http://www.linric.com/webpsysi.htm


The Inversion Temperature:
" the 'normal' effect of cooling when a gas expands takes place below that temperature, 
above that temperature it heats under expansion."

Gas Inversion Temp Deg K
Space 0-3
Helium 51
Hydrogen 205 -90.67 F
Neon 242
Nitrogen 621 658.13 F
Argon 723 841.73 F
Krypton 727
Oxygen893 1147.73Xenon 1427 

Zero Deg C = 273 Deg K
Zero Deg F = 255 Deg K

Conversion calculators.

http://www.onlineconversion.com/temperature.htm

Fred

Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-05-01 Thread Frederick Sparber




Posted earlier:

 IOW. The "Joe Cell" may turn out to be a Red Herring.

I meant it may not need to produce O, OH, and H, H2 or H3O,
but, the electrolysis heat from the battery may provide the heat 
for vaporizing the water, 

SATURATED STEAM TABLE CALCULATOR: (and more)

http://www.connel.com/cgi-bin/steam.pl


Why rack your brain? :-)

Fred

- Original Message - 
From: Frederick Sparber 
To: vortex-l
Sent: 5/1/2006 6:19:57 PM 
Subject: Re: Hydrino orgone

Let's find out if nature's thermodynamics allows an engine 
to run on damp air created by using the evaporative cooling
effect (Venturi aspiration on water) on the incoming air, and 
using the 4 cycle engine to optimize the INVERSION TEMPERATURE
so that during the power stroke the EXPANDING GAS HEATS.
IOW. The "Joe Cell" may turn out to be a Red Herring.

USE THIS PSYCH CHART:

http://www.linric.com/webpsysi.htm


The Inversion Temperature:
" the 'normal' effect of cooling when a gas expands takes place below that temperature, 
above that temperature it heats under expansion."

Gas Inversion Temp Deg K
Space 0-3
Helium 51
Hydrogen 205 -90.67 F
Neon 242
Nitrogen 621 658.13 F
Argon 723 841.73 F
Krypton 727
Oxygen893 1147.73Xenon 1427 

Zero Deg C = 273 Deg K
Zero Deg F = 255 Deg K

Conversion calculators.

http://www.onlineconversion.com/temperature.htm

Fred

Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-04-30 Thread Grimer
At 04:20 am 30/04/2006 -0600, Fred wrote:

Frank Grimer wrote:

 Sounds plausible. For example, it would be difficult for 
 someone to invent the following since it is unlikely they
 would understand the concept of negative energy.

 That statement sounds as though it comes from a garage 
 experimentalist who is not inhibited by conventional 
 theory and does not realise the what he is doing is 
 supposed to be impossible.

 The idea of using cold as an energy source reminds one of a 
 Stirling engine running on ice.
 

 Take it a step further, Frank.

 The predominant factor as seen in most OU effects is the
 transient exposure of atoms-molecules to low pressure soft vacuum.
 Vortices, Orgone, MAHG, Cavitation Bubbles, Exploding Lightbulbs,
 and so on.

 Almost as though soft vacuum exposure allows the Casimir Force 
 to collapse the electron clouds  closer into the nuclei. WIMPS?


Absolutely.  8-)

In my language is a case of Beta-atmosphere condensation
when the Beta-atmosphere pressure drops - a process very
analogous to Alpha atmosphere condensation when the A-atm
pressure drops. It seems more than likely that Bo-Ein. 
explanation for CF is just an unnecessarily complicated way 
of saying the same thing. One can imagine people explaining 
water condensation in an equally redundant fashion.


 Or conversely, the electron clouds expand outwardly from the
 nuclei by ZPE pumping and they collapse into the normal 
 ambient/ground state
 when exposed to a triggering energy.

 All of our pet agenda explanations go out the door, along with our concept
 of Enthalpy-Entropy /Thermodynamics.  :-)


Well, I suppose it's a bit like Ohm's Law going out the window
when alternating current became popular. Ohms Law wasn't wrong.
It was just restricted to a particular boundary case of 
alternating current with zero frequency.

Frank



Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-04-30 Thread RC Macaulay




Fred wrote..

The predominant factor as seen in 
most OU effects is the
transient exposure of atoms-molecules to 
low pressure "soft vacuum".
Vortices, Orgone, MAHG, Cavitation 
Bubbles, Exploding Lightbulbs,
and so on.
Or conversely, the electron clouds expand 
outwardly from the
nuclei by ZPE pumping and they collapse 
into the normal "ambient/ground state"
when exposed to a triggering 
energy.

All of our pet agenda explanations go out 
the door, along with our concept
of 
Enthalpy-Entropy/"Thermodynamics". :-)


Howdy Fred and Grimer,
Any high school physics student can tell 
somethingis missing from the concept of thermodynamics.
The trouble with saddling a strange horse in the 
dark is the risk of choosing a 3 legged one. Once in the saddle you 
are not only in for a rough ride, it's embarrassing when daylight 
comes.
However, when one is stuck for transportation 
trying to get where one's going, one must be creative in their 
posture. 
Either laugh it off or deride thoseon polkadot horses.
Thus the plight of certain areas of mainstream 
science.

Richard



Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-04-30 Thread Philip Winestone


Right Richard.
Whenever you hear or see the word mainstream just substitute
the word herd.
(By the way, we used to have the same problem in Scotland; whether to
catch and eat plain Haggis or polkadot Haggis...)
P.

At 06:54 AM 4/30/2006 -0500, you wrote:
Fred
wrote..

The predominant factor as
seen in most OU effects is the
transient exposure of atoms-molecules to low pressure soft
vacuum.
Vortices, Orgone, MAHG, Cavitation Bubbles, Exploding Lightbulbs,
and so on.
Or conversely, the electron clouds expand outwardly from the
nuclei by ZPE pumping and they collapse into the normal
ambient/ground state
when exposed to a triggering energy.

All of our pet agenda
explanations go out the door, along with our concept
of Enthalpy-Entropy /Thermodynamics. :-)


Howdy Fred and Grimer,
Any high school physics student can tell something is missing from the
concept of thermodynamics.
The trouble with saddling a strange horse in the dark is the risk of
choosing a 3 legged one. Once in the saddle you are not only
in for a rough ride, it's embarrassing when daylight comes.
However, when one is stuck for transportation trying to get where one's
going, one must be creative in their
posture.
Either laugh it off or deride those on polkadot horses.
Thus the plight of certain areas of mainstream science.

Richard






Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-04-30 Thread Harry Veeder

Cool.

Harry

Grimer wrote:

 At 09:48 am 30/04/2006 +1000, you wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I just came across this:-
 
 http://www.nutech2000.com/webtext/forum/hydrinopower.html
 
 
 Sounds plausible. For example, it would be difficult for
 someone to invent the following since it is unlikely they
 would understand the concept of negative energy.
 
 
 One of the difficulties of the JOE cell appeared to be that
 the motor ran so cold that the water in circulation in the
 car motor froze. It was proposed that the water in the cars
 cooling system be replaced with hydraulic fluid which doesn't
 freeze as readily.
 
 
 That statement sounds as though it comes from a garage
 experimentalist who is not inhibited by conventional
 theory and does not realise the what he is doing is
 supposed to be impossible.
 
 The idea of using cold as an energy source reminds one of a
 Stirling engine running on ice.
 
 Mmmminteresting.
 
 Frank Grimer
 
 
 



Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-04-30 Thread Grimer
At 06:59 am 30/04/2006 -0600, Fred wrote:

 Richard wrote.
 Howdy Fred and Grimer,
 Any high school physics student can tell something 
 is missing from the concept of thermodynamics.


 The Negative/plate-push Casimir Force and the 
 Negative Heat (ZPE) Vacuum, perhaps?


 The trouble with saddling a strange horse in the 
 dark is the risk of choosing a  3 legged one.  
 Once in the saddle you are not only in for a 
 rough ride, it's embarrassing when daylight comes


 Or you could lend your steed a hand.  :-)


 However, when one is stuck for transportation 
 trying to get where one's going, 
 one must be creative in their posture.   


I think they call it crawling when you do that.


Or even brown nosing.  ;-)

 
  Either laugh it off or deride those on polkadot horses.


 Or Gold Caddies.


 Thus the plight of certain areas of mainstream science.


 As strange as the Joe Cell - Hydrino Orgone presentations are, 
 ignorance may very well be bliss, as Frank Grimer suggests. 


He has indeed deposuit potentes de sede et exaltavit humiles.


 Hydrino is a catchy name for a Weakly Interacting Massive 
 Particle WIMP, created by transitory exposure to the low 
 pressure soft vacuum 

In terms of the Beta-atmosphere that should be hard vacuum.
See explanation below.

  that both of these have in common.
 That is to say, low pressure electrolysis cells that provide 
 the heat of vaporization of the water and also use the 
 evaporated water vapor H2O as a carrier for the generated 
 OH and H or H3O free radicals which may concurrently be 
 expanding or contracting due to Casimir-Vacuum ZPE effects
 with the low Cell pressures (~ 60 liters/gram vapour 
 densities) created by the engine suction/manifold pressure.

Fred
 
Yep. I think our ideas are slowly converging and we are 
getting there. As shown by what I call the PV^6 relation

(but what might be more intelligible if I called it the
   B-atm.pressure + applied pressure)^6 = a constant
   where B-atm.pressure is approx. 4000 atmospheres)

there is a hard B-atm vacuum of -60,000 psi in the spaces
between the water molecule/clusters and this is responsible
for the unrecognised physics. Think of it at very low 
temperature which shrinks thingees or the inverse, very 
high Compreture which squashes thingees.   8-)

Cheers,

Frank





Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-04-30 Thread Frederick Sparber
Grimer wrote.

 At 06:59 am 30/04/2006 -0600, Fred wrote:


  As strange as the Joe Cell - Hydrino Orgone presentations are, 
  ignorance may very well be bliss, as Frank Grimer suggests. 


 He has indeed deposuit potentes de sede et exaltavit humiles.

I hope you're not insulting me in your style of English.

  Hydrino is a catchy name for a Weakly Interacting Massive 
  Particle WIMP, created by transitory exposure to the low 
  pressure soft vacuum 

 In terms of the Beta-atmosphere that should be hard vacuum.
 See explanation below.

Okay, Frank. By soft vacuum I was referring to residual atoms-molecules
with enough mean-free-path spacing to allow hard vacuum interaction with
them
viz the Casimir plates pushing together, usually the force is measured in a
good vacuum.
 
  That is to say, low pressure electrolysis cells that provide 
  the heat of vaporization of the water and also use the 
  evaporated water vapor H2O as a carrier for the generated 
  OH and H or H3O free radicals which may concurrently be 
  expanding or contracting due to Casimir-Vacuum ZPE effects
  with the low Cell pressures (~ 60 liters/gram vapour 
  densities) created by the engine suction/manifold pressure.

  
 Yep. I think our ideas are slowly converging and we are 
 getting there. As shown by what I call the PV^6 relation

 (but what might be more intelligible if I called it the
B-atm.pressure + applied pressure)^6 = a constant
where B-atm.pressure is approx. 4000 atmospheres)

Hal Puthoff once told me that the Casimir Plate force was 1/D^4
Does that come out the same, or could the be seeing electromagnetic
interaction?
Van der waals forces are 6th -12th power aren't they?

 there is a hard B-atm vacuum of -60,000 psi in the spaces
 between the water molecule/clusters and this is responsible
 for the unrecognised physics. Think of it at very low 
 temperature which shrinks thingees or the inverse, very 
 high Compreture which squashes thingees.   8-)

Right, Frank. Thanks for staying on topic. :-)

Fred

 Cheers,

 Frank







Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-04-30 Thread Grimer
At 01:11 pm 30/04/2006 -0600, Fred wrote:

Grimer wrote.
 He has indeed deposuit potentes de sede et exaltavit humiles.


I hope you're not insulting me in your style of English.


I was referring to the garage experimenters. As for it being an
insult - hardly. It's a line from the Magnificat, a hymn of praise
to the Mother of God.


 Hydrino is a catchy name for a Weakly Interacting Massive 
 Particle WIMP, created by transitory exposure to the low 
 pressure soft vacuum 

 In terms of the Beta-atmosphere that should be hard vacuum.
 See explanation below.


 Okay, Frank. By soft vacuum I was referring to residual 
 atoms-molecules with enough mean-free-path spacing to allow 
 hard vacuum interaction with them viz the Casimir plates 
 pushing together, usually the force is measured in a good vacuum.
 ...
 Hal Puthoff once told me that the Casimir Plate force was 1/D^4

Yep. But as I pointed in previous posts (Vortex or B-atm.Group)
the fourth power relates to the 1D case. For 2D and 3D you have
8th and 12th powers respectively as illustrated by the vapour 
pressure laws of H2O. 

So if we have any clustering the higher powers will apply.

Cheers,

Frank







Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-04-30 Thread Frederick Sparber


Low pressure effects and turbulencein tornados-hurricanes-vortices aside
for the moment, J. L.. Naudin's pulsed MAHG was at about 80 torr pressure.

The pulsing at ~ 1.0 millisecond on and ~ 19 milliseconds off
would be a way thatmighthave vacuum effects similar to
those that seem to be occurring in the J Cell. 
Hard to say what was going on in his calorimetry under the conditions
where the"hydrino collapse- expansion" was drawing heat from the water in it
one moment and adding it the next.

Fred

Hydrino orgone

2006-04-29 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
Hi,

I just came across this:-

http://www.nutech2000.com/webtext/forum/hydrinopower.html

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/

Competition provides the motivation,
Cooperation provides the means.



Re: Hydrino orgone

2006-04-29 Thread Grimer
At 09:48 am 30/04/2006 +1000, you wrote:
Hi,

I just came across this:-

http://www.nutech2000.com/webtext/forum/hydrinopower.html


Sounds plausible. For example, it would be difficult for 
someone to invent the following since it is unlikely they
would understand the concept of negative energy.


One of the difficulties of the JOE cell appeared to be that 
the motor ran so cold that the water in circulation in the 
car motor froze. It was proposed that the water in the cars 
cooling system be replaced with hydraulic fluid which doesn't 
freeze as readily.


That statement sounds as though it comes from a garage 
experimentalist who is not inhibited by conventional 
theory and does not realise the what he is doing is 
supposed to be impossible.

The idea of using cold as an energy source reminds one of a 
Stirling engine running on ice.

Mmmminteresting.

Frank Grimer