Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag
Stewart, send it over to Vortex-L and many here will look it over. I for one are very interested in looking at this new theory. Jojo - Original Message - From: Chemical Engineer To: c...@googlegroups.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:49 AM Subject: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag Just a couple of quick corrections to my previous draft My first instance of 1-8 keV should have read 1-8 TeV (it was correct in the second usage) and A negatively charged singularity would feed preferentially from POSITIVELY charged particles instead of negatively. Sorry for the confusion. On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com wrote: All, I understand that National Instruments is now calling this a quantum reactor. I have attached a draft of what I believe, without a doubt is the primary Nuclear process formerly known as Cold Fusion or LENR. May they, along with Martin, RIP. There are three primary forms of Nuclear energy in the world, Fission, Fusion Singularity (Black Hole) Evaporation. The first two can hopefully be retired. Excuse the quality of the draft but you will get the idea. I weighed heavily on a recent CERN study by Chan on black hole creation concerns at the LHC. I would like to have somebody sponsor me on publishing my summary to Arxiv (after I clean it up some). I am going to follow up with some calculations once I brush up on my particle and quantum physics math... It is a beautiful day, don't let it slip away (U2 Bono) Stewart D. Simonson cheme...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag
Jojo, Thanks. It is a very elegant and simple explanation (I guess that is why it is called a singularity). Einstein in his final years worked in this area. Hawking/Penrose should be thanked as well as all of the others now working on it. In truth, we have been surrounded by the process daily when lightning strikes and electrical currents ebb and flow. We have been given a 3rd gift of Nuclear Energy, I hope we do better than we have with the first two. The nuclear discharge from a singularity is truly the stuff universes are made of and we now have that power. To that which much is given, much is expected. I hope we as a race live up to that expectation. Godspeed On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote: ** Stewart, send it over to Vortex-L and many here will look it over. I for one are very interested in looking at this new theory. Jojo - Original Message - *From:* Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com *To:* c...@googlegroups.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com *Sent:* Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:49 AM *Subject:* [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag Just a couple of quick corrections to my previous draft My first instance of 1-8 keV should have read 1-8 TeV (it was correct in the second usage) and A negatively charged singularity would feed preferentially from POSITIVELY charged particles instead of negatively. Sorry for the confusion. On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.comwrote: All, I understand that National Instruments is now calling this a quantum reactor. I have attached a draft of what I believe, without a doubt is the primary Nuclear process formerly known as Cold Fusion or LENR. May they, along with Martin, RIP. There are three primary forms of Nuclear energy in the world, Fission, Fusion Singularity (Black Hole) Evaporation. The first two can hopefully be retired. Excuse the quality of the draft but you will get the idea. I weighed heavily on a recent CERN study by Chan on black hole creation concerns at the LHC. I would like to have somebody sponsor me on publishing my summary to Arxiv (after I clean it up some). I am going to follow up with some calculations once I brush up on my particle and quantum physics math... It is a beautiful day, don't let it slip away (U2 Bono) Stewart D. Simonson cheme...@gmail.com
RE: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag
Hell yes send it over here! The Collective is all about discussing the fringes. we don't have to worry about 'academic' or 'professional' reputations, so we're open to most all things. and hopefully backed up with some data. -Mark Iverson From: Jojo Jaro [mailto:jth...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:32 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag Stewart, send it over to Vortex-L and many here will look it over. I for one are very interested in looking at this new theory. Jojo - Original Message - From: Chemical Engineer mailto:cheme...@gmail.com To: c...@googlegroups.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:49 AM Subject: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag Just a couple of quick corrections to my previous draft My first instance of 1-8 keV should have read 1-8 TeV (it was correct in the second usage) and A negatively charged singularity would feed preferentially from POSITIVELY charged particles instead of negatively. Sorry for the confusion. On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com wrote: All, I understand that National Instruments is now calling this a quantum reactor. I have attached a draft of what I believe, without a doubt is the primary Nuclear process formerly known as Cold Fusion or LENR. May they, along with Martin, RIP. There are three primary forms of Nuclear energy in the world, Fission, Fusion Singularity (Black Hole) Evaporation. The first two can hopefully be retired. Excuse the quality of the draft but you will get the idea. I weighed heavily on a recent CERN study by Chan on black hole creation concerns at the LHC. I would like to have somebody sponsor me on publishing my summary to Arxiv (after I clean it up some). I am going to follow up with some calculations once I brush up on my particle and quantum physics math... It is a beautiful day, don't let it slip away (U2 Bono) Stewart D. Simonson cheme...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag
Guys, A couple things: Daniel wanted me to clarify my theory some more so here it goes: Things just did not make sense to me about so many confusing fusion theories about all the similar effects. I posed some questions to Abd a few nights ago and he never responded. I joked about a grand unified theory of cold fusion because there are so many. I am en engineer and like many want to build something and get it to market but to do that requires a basic understanding of the reaction. 1) First off, I believe Ed. S is right, the primary reaction is not taking place with the lattice metal as he states correctly but it is happening in the voids/cracks/impurities as he states. 2) The hydrogen gas is heated and pressurized which will increase the rate of collisions of hydrogen and also loads/absorbs hydrogen into the metal lattice - (basic chemistry) 3) The electrical stimulation of the hydrogen is carried out by electrical potential differences across the voids/cracks/impurities in the lattice (sparks jump across the gaps voids and a potential difference builds up across dissimilar metals) . This can also be done with a spark plug as DGT uses which creates an electrostatic charge on the microparticle suspension (same effect) 4)The electrical arcing splits the hydrogen to create atomic hydrogen and it also concentrates energy on the atomic hydrogen as it collides (basic electrochemistry mixed with particle physics) 5) If the concentrated energy at collision exceeds ~ 1-8 TeV, according to theory (If you believe in more space dimensions at quantum scales and how strong quantum gravity acting on the bulk/brane is) at the collision point/instant of the Atomic Hydrogen it causes the hydrogen molecules to collapse into each other creating a singularity (particle physics and quantum physics - I weighed heavily on the CERN paper) 6) The voids in the lattice actually increase the effect of quantum scale gravity due to the hoop effect (gravitons) I mentioned in my paper (The atomic hydrogen is squeezed into a void on all sides which magnifies the quantum effect of gravity, effectively aiding in crushing the atomic hydrogen into a singularity) 7) The collapsed micro/quantum black holes can consume more hydrogen based upon their lifetime but evaporate very quickly releasing heat and low levels of radiation products. Some of this quantum goo bombards the lattice and may result in some additional Nuclear by-products 8) Depending the duration of singularity creation/evaporation this effect will create an effect such as heat after death I believe we humans now have a nice baby black hole generator which generates heat and some low level radiation . I am a big Steven Hawking fan so I recognize this effect I have read every post, blog, paper that I could over the past year and I believe my theory has a basis and is what is needed to focus the development effort. Of course I may be wrong, but I don't make my living coming up with theories. If it is some type of fusion and not Hawking Radiation than I will still have alot of engineering work to do over the next 20 years and everyone will laugh at my crazy theory. If I am right and as I think about it, given the fact that universes are created from singularities, I believe we better be careful what we are playing with else we might become one of those black holes we see up in the sky... On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Guys, I did it again, I have a couple revisions of this, in one instance it should say 1-8 TeV instead of 1-8 keV. I have attached the latest. On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.comwrote: I thought I posted it to both Vortex CMNS at the same time. I believe I have identified the wicked gremlin (attached) Sorry! On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:25 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote: Hell yes send it over here! The Collective is all about discussing the fringes… we don’t have to worry about ‘academic’ or ‘professional’ reputations, so we’re open to most all things… and hopefully backed up with some data. ** ** -Mark Iverson ** ** *From:* Jojo Jaro [mailto:jth...@hotmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:32 PM *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag ** ** Stewart, send it over to Vortex-L and many here will look it over. I for one are very interested in looking at this new theory. Jojo - Original Message - *From:* Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com *To:* c...@googlegroups.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com *Sent:* Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:49 AM *Subject:* [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag ** ** Just a couple of quick corrections to my previous draft ** ** My first instance of 1-8 keV should have read 1-8 TeV (it was correct in the second usage) and A negatively
