Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
This may be the reason why nanoplamonic experimentation is usually done using gold. Nickel is very reactive. On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:47 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: My guess is that these are the hardest to remove from circulating air. - probably it's better to keep them in a confined chamber when preparing a colloid. I am not sure whether they penetrate skin. I suspect that another problem is with nickel, specifically. I had a watch with a nickel wristband at one point, and I gradually developed a severe and chronic rash. There was a welt on my wrist for several months after I stopped wearing the watch. So the nanopowder nickel particles could potentially cause a great deal of irritation in the lungs and a powerful immune response as a result. Eric
Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
Celani often mentioned 'sintering' a problem in his processed Constantan wires during the conversations I had. This might be related. So, what would be a good process to make suitable nano nickel (as you called 'type 2')?
Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
If Rossi actually knows something, he needs to document his process as carefully as possible and directly help others to reproduce his work. If his work can actually be reproduced, that would be groundbreaking, magnificent. If he doesn't help others to reproduce his work, and no one can reproduce his work... then his name will die and no one will care. - Joe
Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
Joseph S. Barrera III j...@barrera.org wrote: If Rossi actually knows something, he needs to document his process as carefully as possible and directly help others to reproduce his work. That would be a patent. What you are describing is a patent. It protects the owner's intellectual property. Storms and others suspect that Rossi does not understand his device well enough to write a patent that will hold up to challenges. The patents he has filed so far seem worthless to me. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
I think that QuantumSphere can make a good nickel nanoparticle. http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/3.08/nano.html I would try this particle to start off with Get product info https://portal.luxresearchinc.com/research/profile_excerpt/QuantumSphere Then I would ask them to make a five micro nanoparticle that looks like a sea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/*Sea*_*urchin* On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote: Celani often mentioned 'sintering' a problem in his processed Constantan wires during the conversations I had. This might be related. So, what would be a good process to make suitable nano nickel (as you called 'type 2')?
Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
Axil, Don't forget this is dangerous stuff for the amateur. Google nickel nanoparticles danger - You will find references like - Nickel Nanoparticles Favor Development of Cancer http://news.softpedia.com/news/Nickel-Nanoparticles-Favor-Development-of-Cancer-218239.shtml Nickel Nanoparticles may be Harmful say Researchers http://www.nanotechnologydevelopment.com/medical/nickel-nanoparticles-may-be-harmful-say-researchers.html Axil wrote: I think that QuantumSphere can make a good nickel nanoparticle. http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/3.08/nano.html I would try this particle to start off with Get product info https://portal.luxresearchinc.com/research/profile_excerpt/QuantumSphere Then I would ask them to make a five micro nanoparticle that looks like a sea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/*Sea*_*urchin* On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote: Celani often mentioned 'sintering' a problem in his processed Constantan wires during the conversations I had. This might be related. So, what would be a good process to make suitable nano nickel (as you called 'type 2')?
Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
In an emergency situation can a strong magnet pull most of these from the room air? If so, it might be wise to keep one handy when running experiments with nickel powder. Dave -Original Message- From: pagnucco pagnu...@htdconnect.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thu, May 2, 2013 3:32 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem. Axil, Don't forget this is dangerous stuff for the amateur. Google nickel nanoparticles danger - You will find references like - Nickel Nanoparticles Favor Development of Cancer http://news.softpedia.com/news/Nickel-Nanoparticles-Favor-Development-of-Cancer-218239.shtml Nickel Nanoparticles may be Harmful say Researchers http://www.nanotechnologydevelopment.com/medical/nickel-nanoparticles-may-be-harmful-say-researchers.html Axil wrote: I think that QuantumSphere can make a good nickel nanoparticle. http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/3.08/nano.html I would try this particle to start off with Get product info https://portal.luxresearchinc.com/research/profile_excerpt/QuantumSphere Then I would ask them to make a five micro nanoparticle that looks like a sea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/*Sea*_*urchin* On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote: Celani often mentioned 'sintering' a problem in his processed Constantan wires during the conversations I had. This might be related. So, what would be a good process to make suitable nano nickel (as you called 'type 2')?
Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
I am not discussing using nano-particles. I am recommending MICRO-particles with a nanowire coating. Yes, these can be dangerous if you breath them in. But it is not easy to breath these big particles in. A dust mask will protect from this danger. 5 microns is the grits size of 1000 grit sanding paper. On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:32 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Axil, Don't forget this is dangerous stuff for the amateur. Google nickel nanoparticles danger - You will find references like - Nickel Nanoparticles Favor Development of Cancer http://news.softpedia.com/news/Nickel-Nanoparticles-Favor-Development-of-Cancer-218239.shtml Nickel Nanoparticles may be Harmful say Researchers http://www.nanotechnologydevelopment.com/medical/nickel-nanoparticles-may-be-harmful-say-researchers.html Axil wrote: I think that QuantumSphere can make a good nickel nanoparticle. http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/3.08/nano.html I would try this particle to start off with Get product info https://portal.luxresearchinc.com/research/profile_excerpt/QuantumSphere Then I would ask them to make a five micro nanoparticle that looks like a sea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/*Sea*_*urchin* On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote: Celani often mentioned 'sintering' a problem in his processed Constantan wires during the conversations I had. This might be related. So, what would be a good process to make suitable nano nickel (as you called 'type 2')?
Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
Dave, The literature indicates that the smaller the particle, the more dangerous it may be due to larger surface area/volume ratio. My guess is that these are the hardest to remove from circulating air. - probably it's better to keep them in a confined chamber when preparing a colloid. I am not sure whether they penetrate skin. -- Lou Pagnucco Dave Roberson wrote: In an emergency situation can a strong magnet pull most of these from the room air? If so, it might be wise to keep one handy when running experiments with nickel powder. Dave -Original Message- From: pagnucco pagnu...@htdconnect.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thu, May 2, 2013 3:32 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem. Axil, Don't forget this is dangerous stuff for the amateur. Google nickel nanoparticles danger - You will find references like - Nickel Nanoparticles Favor Development of Cancer http://news.softpedia.com/news/Nickel-Nanoparticles-Favor-Development-of-Cancer-218239.shtml Nickel Nanoparticles may be Harmful say Researchers http://www.nanotechnologydevelopment.com/medical/nickel-nanoparticles-may-be-harmful-say-researchers.html Axil wrote: I think that QuantumSphere can make a good nickel nanoparticle. http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/3.08/nano.html I would try this particle to start off with Get product info https://portal.luxresearchinc.com/research/profile_excerpt/QuantumSphere Then I would ask them to make a five micro nanoparticle that looks like a sea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/*Sea*_*urchin* On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote: Celani often mentioned 'sintering' a problem in his processed Constantan wires during the conversations I had. This might be related. So, what would be a good process to make suitable nano nickel (as you called 'type 2')?
Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
I just wonder whether crystalization / re-crystalization of the nickel do overrule the initial particle structures. Since Rossi indicates that shuting down an e-cat takes a few hours, probably due to overcooling, leaves the heated nickel in an amorfhous form. It may even be that the nickel needs to be specifically in an amorphous or in a crysteline form to allow starting up the extra heat generation.
Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote: I just wonder whether crystalization / re-crystalization of the nickel do overrule the initial particle structures. No. DGT says that there is a great increase in boron and beryllium near the NAE. So material composition of the NAE is not important. Since Rossi indicates that shuting down an e-cat takes a few hours, probably due to overcooling, leaves the heated nickel in an amorfhous form. This brings up and interesting comparison between the Rossi reactor and the DGT reactor. Rossi runs his reactor very close to criticality because he uses heat to produce electrons on the surface of his powder. The powder must be charged like a capacitor. DGT runs a subcritical electron powder charge. They use spark discharge to increase the charge concentration on the surface of their micro-powder. They pulse the spark at an optimum rate to get their micro powder to criticality. Because the DGT powder is sub-critical, DGT can stop it easily by not adding charge to the powder surface when it is required. Stopping electron recharge stops the DGT reaction is short order. As an option, they can also reduce the pressure of the dielectric gas to increase the release of electric charge from the surface of the powder. It may even be that the nickel needs to be specifically in an amorphous or in a crysteline form to allow starting up the extra heat generation. The detailed composition of the nanowires in and close to the NAE is not important. There is substantial transmutation in and near the NAE produced by the nanowire. However, the dipole character of the micro powder is important. Transmutation does not occur very far from the NAE so charges in the character of nickel in the bulk of the micro-powder do not happen.
Re: [Vo]:Poor nano-powder design is your problem.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:47 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: My guess is that these are the hardest to remove from circulating air. - probably it's better to keep them in a confined chamber when preparing a colloid. I am not sure whether they penetrate skin. I suspect that another problem is with nickel, specifically. I had a watch with a nickel wristband at one point, and I gradually developed a severe and chronic rash. There was a welt on my wrist for several months after I stopped wearing the watch. So the nanopowder nickel particles could potentially cause a great deal of irritation in the lungs and a powerful immune response as a result. Eric
