Re: whats new continue
Title: Re: whats new continue If my answer is unresponsive, does that mean only certain answers are permitted like in the riddle you posed about the two Indian tribes? Harry RC Macaulay at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not so fast Harry,, when challenged by the intellectual Darwainians, their challenge in itself presupposes they can prove evolution. Evidence of changes ,are of in itself, no proof. My question is simple explain the origin of time and distance. Mr big discounted as an unresponsive answer. Richard
Re: Whats new continue
Gosh !! Harry , Were I soliciting a simple answer to my riddle regarding red feet vs green feet, I would have posed the question part as ..if you could determine if they were ( lying or telling the truth) to ..if they were green feet or red feet. This group is swift, thats what makes it enjoyable. Richard Blank Bkgrd.gif
RE: whats new continue
Hi RC Richard writes: Mr big discounted as an unresponsive answer. Wow, I couldn't have put that more succinctly myself. So can we assume that you've given up on the creationist notion? (grin) Mind you, I'm not asking if you accept Darwins theories. Just whether you agree with your own statement that Mr Big is a non-answer to the question of the creation of the universe. K.
Re: whats new continue
The answer I supplied challenges the question. The question is leading to use a legal term. An origin question presumes the subject in question must have an origin. Contemporary science and creationists tend to organise themselves so as to provide answers to such inescapable questions. Creationists will continue to annoy scientists until science begins to question the question. Contemporary science lacks vigour because it has become consumed by the question of origin. Harry Keith Nagel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi RC Richard writes: Mr big discounted as an unresponsive answer. Wow, I couldn't have put that more succinctly myself. So can we assume that you've given up on the creationist notion? (grin) Mind you, I'm not asking if you accept Darwins theories. Just whether you agree with your own statement that Mr Big is a non-answer to the question of the creation of the universe. K.
Re: Whats new continue
Creationism vs. Darwinism.. My simple mind looks at a 3 dollar wind up pocket watch ( Mickey Mouse type preferred) and a yardstick and ponders. If I wind up the watch and as it runs I witness the beginning of a measure of time.. or ..did time exist before I started the watch? Next. I have a ladder that has legs that can extend to infinite height. Taking the yard stick , I began measuring height by the yard . How long would it take me to measure to the "top" ? If the watch never stops.. regardless of how much time elapses, that interval will NEVER equal the amount of time that had passed BEFORE the watch was started. Same for the yardstick. Regardless of how much "height" is measured. it will NEVER equal the distance below the point at which you began measuring. As idiotic as this post reads, it makes a point. That being you can theorize evolution vs creationalism forever and still miss the evidence staring you in the face. Time is... length is. explain its origin. Richard Blank Bkgrd.gif
Re: Whats new continue
Title: Re: Whats new continue RC Macaulay at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Creationism vs. Darwinism.. My simple mind looks at a 3 dollar wind up pocket watch ( Mickey Mouse type preferred) and a yardstick and ponders. If I wind up the watch and as it runs I witness the beginning of a measure of time.. or ..did time exist before I started the watch? Next. I have a ladder that has legs that can extend to infinite height. Taking the yard stick , I began measuring height by the yard . How long would it take me to measure to the top ? If the watch never stops.. regardless of how much time elapses, that interval will NEVER equal the amount of time that had passed BEFORE the watch was started. Same for the yardstick. Regardless of how much height is measured. it will NEVER equal the distance below the point at which you began measuring. As idiotic as this post reads, it makes a point. That being you can theorize evolution vs creationalism forever and still miss the evidence staring you in the face. Time is... length is. explain its origin. Richard Perhaps they have no origin, in the same way as Mr. Big has no origin. Perhaps time and space are just qualities of Mr. Big. Harry
Re: whats new continue
Not so fast Harry,, when challenged by the intellectual Darwainians, their challenge in itself presupposes they can prove evolution. Evidence of changes ,are of in itself, no proof. My question is simple explain the origin of time and distance. Mr big discounted as an unresponsive answer. Richard Blank Bkgrd.gif
