RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
I am confused, if it is stable why is the 1.9 branch called development. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arne Blankerts Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 2:27 PM To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org Subject: RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 12:41 +0200, Ehab Heikal wrote: how stable is the 2.6 branch of vserver, would you run it in a production envoirnment. Stable is very relative definition [tm] I've been using the 2.6 branch on two production servers for quite some time now with no known problems. Actually, it's more stable then the 2.4 version ever was for me... CYA Arne ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:43:50PM +0200, Ehab Heikal wrote: I am confused, if it is stable why is the 1.9 branch called development. probably because 'our' standards are somewhat higher, and we prefer to call it development as long as we are not damn sure that it is rock solid ... (the 2.0 branch will be labeled 'stable') HTH, Herbert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arne Blankerts Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 2:27 PM To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org Subject: RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 12:41 +0200, Ehab Heikal wrote: how stable is the 2.6 branch of vserver, would you run it in a production envoirnment. Stable is very relative definition [tm] I've been using the 2.6 branch on two production servers for quite some time now with no known problems. Actually, it's more stable then the 2.4 version ever was for me... CYA Arne ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
Cool now it will be called stable. I have one question, is virtual networking like with freevps doable? Or is it not there yet or not planned. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ehab Heikal Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 1:44 PM To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem I am confused, if it is stable why is the 1.9 branch called development. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arne Blankerts Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 2:27 PM To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org Subject: RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 12:41 +0200, Ehab Heikal wrote: how stable is the 2.6 branch of vserver, would you run it in a production envoirnment. Stable is very relative definition [tm] I've been using the 2.6 branch on two production servers for quite some time now with no known problems. Actually, it's more stable then the 2.4 version ever was for me... CYA Arne ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
Title: Message how stable is the 2.6 branch of vserver, would you run it in a production envoirnment. If it is not very stable, would the instability affect the vservers or the main server. In my case I have a large site that would benefit if some of the services on it is in a vserver, so I can have the main site on the main server and some less important services on vservers if the instability is only in the vservers. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis PaulischSent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:35 AMTo: vserver@list.linux-vserver.orgSubject: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem Hi,i used the Kernel 2.6.10 and Patch before.. this worked nice.But now i upgraded my Kernel to the latest Version with the new vServer Patch on Kernel 2.6.11.5.I also installed the latest Util-vServer...Now when i try to enter my vserver i got this Problemsociety:~/img # vserver test enterWARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method//lib/util-vserver/legacy/vserver: line 699: ulimit: max user processes: cannot modify limit: Das Argument ist ungültigipv4root is now 192.168.1.151chcontext: vc_new_s_context(): Invalid argumentsociety:~/img #What should i do? Downgrade?I hope any1 can help me.greetz Dennis ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:35:03AM +0200, Dennis Paulisch wrote: Hi, i used the Kernel 2.6.10 and Patch before.. this worked nice. with what tools? But now i upgraded my Kernel to the latest Version with the new vServer Patch on Kernel 2.6.11.5. which patch version? I also installed the latest Util-vServer... which tool version? Now when i try to enter my vserver i got this Problem society:~/img # vserver test enter WARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method //lib/util-vserver/legacy/vserver: line 699: ulimit: max user processes: cannot modify limit: Das Argument ist ungültig ipv4root is now 192.168.1.151 chcontext: vc_new_s_context(): Invalid argument please test with http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/SCRIPT/testme.sh society:~/img # What should i do? Downgrade? I hope any1 can help me. greetz Dennis ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:41:58PM +0200, Ehab Heikal wrote: how stable is the 2.6 branch of vserver, would you run it in a production envoirnment. it seems to be at least as stable as the 2.6 branch of the kernel If it is not very stable, would the instability affect the vservers or the main server. instability affects the entire host, as with all other solutions In my case I have a large site that would benefit if some of the services on it is in a vserver, so I can have the main site on the main server and some less important services on vservers if the instability is only in the vservers. there is no known instability, otherwise we would fix it ;) HTH, Herbert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Paulisch Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:35 AM To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org Subject: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem Hi, i used the Kernel 2.6.10 and Patch before.. this worked nice. But now i upgraded my Kernel to the latest Version with the new vServer Patch on Kernel 2.6.11.5. I also installed the latest Util-vServer... Now when i try to enter my vserver i got this Problem society:~/img # vserver test enter WARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method //lib/util-vserver/legacy/vserver: line 699: ulimit: max user processes: cannot modify limit: Das Argument ist ungültig ipv4root is now 192.168.1.151 chcontext: vc_new_s_context(): Invalid argument society:~/img # What should i do? Downgrade? I hope any1 can help me. greetz Dennis ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 12:41 +0200, Ehab Heikal wrote: how stable is the 2.6 branch of vserver, would you run it in a production envoirnment. Stable is very relative definition [tm] I've been using the 2.6 branch on two production servers for quite some time now with no known problems. Actually, it's more stable then the 2.4 version ever was for me... CYA Arne ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Antwort: Re: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
Output from your Script... Linux-VServer Test [V0.11] (C) 2003-2005 H.Poetzl chcontext is working. chbind is working. Linux 2.6.11.5-vs1.9.5 i686/0.30.204/0.30.204 [Ea] VCI: 0001:0025 273 0316 --- [001]# succeeded. [011]# failed. [031]# succeeded. [101]# succeeded. [102]# succeeded. [201]# succeeded. [202]# succeeded. The Version are both from your site the vs1.9.5 one... I tested it again on my amd64 system, the same error do i forgot something? the vproc unhide is started... :( i hope you can help me :) greetz Dennis Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] r.at An Dennis Paulisch 10.04.2005 14:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopie vserver@list.linux-vserver.org Thema Re: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:35:03AM +0200, Dennis Paulisch wrote: Hi, i used the Kernel 2.6.10 and Patch before.. this worked nice. with what tools? But now i upgraded my Kernel to the latest Version with the new vServer Patch on Kernel 2.6.11.5. which patch version? I also installed the latest Util-vServer... which tool version? Now when i try to enter my vserver i got this Problem society:~/img # vserver test enter WARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method //lib/util-vserver/legacy/vserver: line 699: ulimit: max user processes: cannot modify limit: Das Argument ist ungültig ipv4root is now 192.168.1.151 chcontext: vc_new_s_context(): Invalid argument please test with http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/SCRIPT/testme.sh society:~/img # What should i do? Downgrade? I hope any1 can help me. greetz Dennis ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: Antwort: Re: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 05:48:08PM +0200, Dennis Paulisch wrote: Output from your Script... Linux-VServer Test [V0.11] (C) 2003-2005 H.Poetzl chcontext is working. chbind is working. Linux 2.6.11.5-vs1.9.5 i686/0.30.204/0.30.204 [Ea] VCI: 0001:0025 273 0316 ~~~ --- [001]# succeeded. [011]# failed. [031]# succeeded. [101]# succeeded. [102]# succeeded. [201]# succeeded. [202]# succeeded. The Version are both from your site the vs1.9.5 one... I tested it again on my amd64 system, the same error your tools are using the wrong syscall 273 is for x86 while 236 is for x86_64, this might be caused by various things: - you compiled them in a 32bit environment - for some reason the tools don't get the syscall right this will not work unless your kernel is compiled 32bit too (because of missing compatibility code) make sure to compile them 64bit and that they use the proper syscall (236) HTH, Herbert do i forgot something? the vproc unhide is started... :( i hope you can help me :) greetz Dennis On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:35:03AM +0200, Dennis Paulisch wrote: Hi, i used the Kernel 2.6.10 and Patch before.. this worked nice. with what tools? But now i upgraded my Kernel to the latest Version with the new vServer Patch on Kernel 2.6.11.5. which patch version? I also installed the latest Util-vServer... which tool version? Now when i try to enter my vserver i got this Problem society:~/img # vserver test enter WARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method //lib/util-vserver/legacy/vserver: line 699: ulimit: max user processes: cannot modify limit: Das Argument ist ungültig ipv4root is now 192.168.1.151 chcontext: vc_new_s_context(): Invalid argument please test with http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/SCRIPT/testme.sh society:~/img # What should i do? Downgrade? I hope any1 can help me. greetz Dennis ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
