Re: [webkit-dev] Updating the tradition for new reviewer blog posts
So what is the process then if you have a blog ready to post? Just get one person to review? On 2 ʻAok 2010, at 9:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > I agree that it would be good to have more useful and interesting content. I > don't think it's good to do this by forcing the task on new reviewers. Not > everyone enjoys a writing exercise and it shouldn't be required to become a > reviewer. However, I encourage people to post about cool WebKitty stuff! > > - Maciej > > On Aug 2, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Tony Gentilcore wrote: > >> The Surfin' Safari blog seems to have fairly wide readership in the web dev >> community. Google Reader reports 35k Reader subscribers. For comparison: >> blog.chromium.org has 17k and blog.mozilla.com has 10k. However, the last >> post with descriptive content was back on April 18th. Since that post, we've >> written 8 "X is a now a WebKit reviewer" posts. One recent commenter said: >> >> "I don’t suppose there’s anything more interesting going on in WebKit land >> worth blogging about, is there? So-and-so is a new WebKit reviewer isn’t >> nearly as interesting as whatever new hotness is coming down the pipe. And I >> know I’m not the only one who thinks so… Feel like blogging about WebKit >> awesomeness?" >> >> I propose we increase the amount of blogging about WebKit awesomeness by >> changing the tradition for new reviewer posts. >> >> Instead of defaulting to: >> >> So-and-so is now a WebKit reviewer >> Posted by Someone-else >> So-and-so has worked on awesome-feature or awesome-infrastructure... >> >> We encourage (or just allow?) a format more like: >> >> How awesome-infrastructure works >> Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer >> Here's my description of how awesome-infrastructure works in WebKit... >> >> -OR- >> >> Awesome-feature is the new hotness >> Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer >> Web developers can now use awesome-feature. Here's how it works... >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Tony >> ___ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > ___ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Updating the tradition for new reviewer blog posts
I agree that it would be good to have more useful and interesting content. I don't think it's good to do this by forcing the task on new reviewers. Not everyone enjoys a writing exercise and it shouldn't be required to become a reviewer. However, I encourage people to post about cool WebKitty stuff! - Maciej On Aug 2, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Tony Gentilcore wrote: > The Surfin' Safari blog seems to have fairly wide readership in the web dev > community. Google Reader reports 35k Reader subscribers. For comparison: > blog.chromium.org has 17k and blog.mozilla.com has 10k. However, the last > post with descriptive content was back on April 18th. Since that post, we've > written 8 "X is a now a WebKit reviewer" posts. One recent commenter said: > > "I don’t suppose there’s anything more interesting going on in WebKit land > worth blogging about, is there? So-and-so is a new WebKit reviewer isn’t > nearly as interesting as whatever new hotness is coming down the pipe. And I > know I’m not the only one who thinks so… Feel like blogging about WebKit > awesomeness?" > > I propose we increase the amount of blogging about WebKit awesomeness by > changing the tradition for new reviewer posts. > > Instead of defaulting to: > > So-and-so is now a WebKit reviewer > Posted by Someone-else > So-and-so has worked on awesome-feature or awesome-infrastructure... > > We encourage (or just allow?) a format more like: > > How awesome-infrastructure works > Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer > Here's my description of how awesome-infrastructure works in WebKit... > > -OR- > > Awesome-feature is the new hotness > Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer > Web developers can now use awesome-feature. Here's how it works... > > Thoughts? > > -Tony > ___ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Updating the tradition for new reviewer blog posts
On Aug 2, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > I'd be happy to write more posts for Surfin' Safari, but I don't know > if I need approval, etc. You don't need approval. - Maciej > > Adam > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Eric Seidel wrote: >> Woh. I think that's an awesome idea. :) >> >> Would also make sure that all reviewers are blog-enabled. >> >> Might be a bit to ask of new reviewers though. >> >> -eric >> >> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Tony Gentilcore wrote: >>> The Surfin' Safari blog seems to have fairly wide readership in the web dev >>> community. Google Reader reports 35k Reader subscribers. For comparison: >>> blog.chromium.org has 17k and blog.mozilla.com has 10k. However, the last >>> post with descriptive content was back on April 18th. Since that post, we've >>> written 8 "X is a now a WebKit reviewer" posts. One recent commenter said: >>> "I don’t suppose there’s anything more interesting going on in WebKit land >>> worth blogging about, is there? So-and-so is a new WebKit reviewer isn’t >>> nearly as interesting as whatever new hotness is coming down the pipe. And I >>> know I’m not the only one who thinks so… Feel like blogging about WebKit >>> awesomeness?" >>> >>> I propose we increase the amount of blogging about WebKit awesomeness by >>> changing the tradition for new reviewer posts. >>> >>> Instead of defaulting to: >>> >>> So-and-so is now a WebKit reviewer >>> Posted by Someone-else >>> So-and-so has worked on awesome-feature or awesome-infrastructure... >>> >>> We encourage (or just allow?) a format more like: >>> >>> How awesome-infrastructure works >>> Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer >>> Here's my description of how awesome-infrastructure works in WebKit... >>> -OR- >>> >>> Awesome-feature is the new hotness >>> Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer >>> Web developers can now use awesome-feature. Here's how it works... >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> -Tony >>> ___ >>> webkit-dev mailing list >>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >>> >>> >> ___ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> > ___ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Updating the tradition for new reviewer blog posts
I think that it would be awesome as well. There is so much content to be blogged by the community. For example, I have myself two nice subjects of WebCore stuff I've been involved with: - rect based hit testing; - spatial navigation. Would be more than happy to get the contents of two posts published in Surfing Safari. ps: Maybe having reviewers feed in planet.webkit.org would be also a good idea. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > I'd be happy to write more posts for Surfin' Safari, but I don't know > if I need approval, etc. > > Adam > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Eric Seidel wrote: >> Woh. I think that's an awesome idea. :) >> >> Would also make sure that all reviewers are blog-enabled. >> >> Might be a bit to ask of new reviewers though. >> >> -eric >> >> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Tony Gentilcore wrote: >>> The Surfin' Safari blog seems to have fairly wide readership in the web dev >>> community. Google Reader reports 35k Reader subscribers. For comparison: >>> blog.chromium.org has 17k and blog.mozilla.com has 10k. However, the last >>> post with descriptive content was back on April 18th. Since that post, we've >>> written 8 "X is a now a WebKit reviewer" posts. One recent commenter said: >>> "I don’t suppose there’s anything more interesting going on in WebKit land >>> worth blogging about, is there? So-and-so is a new WebKit reviewer isn’t >>> nearly as interesting as whatever new hotness is coming down the pipe. And I >>> know I’m not the only one who thinks so… Feel like blogging about WebKit >>> awesomeness?" >>> >>> I propose we increase the amount of blogging about WebKit awesomeness by >>> changing the tradition for new reviewer posts. >>> >>> Instead of defaulting to: >>> >>> So-and-so is now a WebKit reviewer >>> Posted by Someone-else >>> So-and-so has worked on awesome-feature or awesome-infrastructure... >>> >>> We encourage (or just allow?) a format more like: >>> >>> How awesome-infrastructure works >>> Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer >>> Here's my description of how awesome-infrastructure works in WebKit... >>> -OR- >>> >>> Awesome-feature is the new hotness >>> Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer >>> Web developers can now use awesome-feature. Here's how it works... >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> -Tony >>> ___ >>> webkit-dev mailing list >>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >>> >>> >> ___ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> > ___ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > -- --Antonio Gomes ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Updating the tradition for new reviewer blog posts
I'd be happy to write more posts for Surfin' Safari, but I don't know if I need approval, etc. Adam On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Eric Seidel wrote: > Woh. I think that's an awesome idea. :) > > Would also make sure that all reviewers are blog-enabled. > > Might be a bit to ask of new reviewers though. > > -eric > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Tony Gentilcore wrote: >> The Surfin' Safari blog seems to have fairly wide readership in the web dev >> community. Google Reader reports 35k Reader subscribers. For comparison: >> blog.chromium.org has 17k and blog.mozilla.com has 10k. However, the last >> post with descriptive content was back on April 18th. Since that post, we've >> written 8 "X is a now a WebKit reviewer" posts. One recent commenter said: >> "I don’t suppose there’s anything more interesting going on in WebKit land >> worth blogging about, is there? So-and-so is a new WebKit reviewer isn’t >> nearly as interesting as whatever new hotness is coming down the pipe. And I >> know I’m not the only one who thinks so… Feel like blogging about WebKit >> awesomeness?" >> >> I propose we increase the amount of blogging about WebKit awesomeness by >> changing the tradition for new reviewer posts. >> >> Instead of defaulting to: >> >> So-and-so is now a WebKit reviewer >> Posted by Someone-else >> So-and-so has worked on awesome-feature or awesome-infrastructure... >> >> We encourage (or just allow?) a format more like: >> >> How awesome-infrastructure works >> Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer >> Here's my description of how awesome-infrastructure works in WebKit... >> -OR- >> >> Awesome-feature is the new hotness >> Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer >> Web developers can now use awesome-feature. Here's how it works... >> >> Thoughts? >> -Tony >> ___ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> >> > ___ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Updating the tradition for new reviewer blog posts
Woh. I think that's an awesome idea. :) Would also make sure that all reviewers are blog-enabled. Might be a bit to ask of new reviewers though. -eric On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Tony Gentilcore wrote: > The Surfin' Safari blog seems to have fairly wide readership in the web dev > community. Google Reader reports 35k Reader subscribers. For comparison: > blog.chromium.org has 17k and blog.mozilla.com has 10k. However, the last > post with descriptive content was back on April 18th. Since that post, we've > written 8 "X is a now a WebKit reviewer" posts. One recent commenter said: > "I don’t suppose there’s anything more interesting going on in WebKit land > worth blogging about, is there? So-and-so is a new WebKit reviewer isn’t > nearly as interesting as whatever new hotness is coming down the pipe. And I > know I’m not the only one who thinks so… Feel like blogging about WebKit > awesomeness?" > > I propose we increase the amount of blogging about WebKit awesomeness by > changing the tradition for new reviewer posts. > > Instead of defaulting to: > > So-and-so is now a WebKit reviewer > Posted by Someone-else > So-and-so has worked on awesome-feature or awesome-infrastructure... > > We encourage (or just allow?) a format more like: > > How awesome-infrastructure works > Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer > Here's my description of how awesome-infrastructure works in WebKit... > -OR- > > Awesome-feature is the new hotness > Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer > Web developers can now use awesome-feature. Here's how it works... > > Thoughts? > -Tony > ___ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
[webkit-dev] Updating the tradition for new reviewer blog posts
The Surfin' Safari blog seems to have fairly wide readership in the web dev community. Google Reader reports 35k Reader subscribers. For comparison: blog.chromium.org has 17k and blog.mozilla.com has 10k. However, the last post with descriptive content was back on April 18th. Since that post, we've written 8 "X is a now a WebKit reviewer" posts. One recent commenter said: *"I don’t suppose there’s anything more interesting going on in WebKit land worth blogging about, is there? So-and-so is a new WebKit reviewer isn’t nearly as interesting as whatever new hotness is coming down the pipe. And I know I’m not the only one who thinks so… Feel like blogging about WebKit awesomeness?"* I propose we increase the amount of blogging about WebKit awesomeness by changing the tradition for new reviewer posts. Instead of defaulting to: * So-and-so is now a WebKit reviewer* * Posted by Someone-else So-and-so has worked on awesome-feature or awesome-infrastructure...* We encourage (or just allow?) a format more like: * How awesome-infrastructure works* * Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer Here's my description of how awesome-infrastructure works in WebKit...* * * * -OR- * * ** Awesome-feature is the new hotness* * Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer Web developers can now use awesome-feature. Here's how it works...* Thoughts? -Tony ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
