Re: [Wicket-user] IMPORTANT: your opinion on the constructor change in 2.0
Hi Eelco, On 3/6/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Who uses 2.0 for serious projects? Not right now. I use only official released versions, so now I'm developing with 1.2.5 and planning to migrate to 1.3 as soon as it is available. 2) What do you think of the constructor change? Do you prefer 1.3's add style or 2.0's style of passing in the parent construction time. I like Wicket 2.0 constructors because they allow to access the hierarchy of the component at construction time, and make it more difficult (if not impossible) to forget to add an element to the current component. I haven't used it so much though.. and the examples Igor shows are pretty scary. 3) If we would ever backtrack on the constructor change (*if*, don't panic for now) how much trouble would that give you? I'm not writing applications with W2, so it'd cause no troubles ;-) -- Filippo Diotalevi http://www.diotalevi.com http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] WicketTester message resolution
Hi, my application is in the (usual, I think) situation where the messages for the page (i.e.) ContactMePage are partly contained in the ContactMePage.properties file, and partly in the global MyWebApplication.properties file. In this situation, when I use WicketTester to test the ContactMePage I see a lot of INFO log like: WicketMessageResolver - No value found for message key: contact.email because the MockWebApplication cannot resolve messages belonging to the global property file. Is there a way to make WicketTester aware of the existence of global message bundles? (And a more general question) how do you test that all wicket:messages are rendered correctly? Thanks -- Filippo Diotalevi http://www.diotalevi.com http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WicketTester message resolution
On 3/7/07, Dmitry Kandalov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To use application properties I extend WicketTester and have this in constructor: [CUT] Thanks Dmitry I'll give it a try -- Filippo Diotalevi http://www.diotalevi.com http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WicketTester question
On 3/2/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the components are logged as 'not rendered', but all tests are
passed and the application works.
Is this the normal behaviour of tests?
That doesn't look normal to me. Did you get any further insight?
Yes, what I discovered is that if I initialize the WicketTester with
the construct
wt.startPage(new ITestPageSource() {
public Page getTestPage() {
return new SummaryJob(new JobPost());
}
});
everything goes well; on the contrary, if I use the other constructor
wt.startPage(new SummaryJob(new JobPost()));
the test runs fine, but I have all the exceptions I reported before in the log.
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
http://www.jugmilano.it
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WicketTester question
On 3/4/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, you're using Wicket 1.2.5? Yes, Wicket 1.2.5 -- Filippo Diotalevi http://www.diotalevi.com http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] WicketTester question
Hi,
I'm writing tests using WicketTester (with Wicket 1.2.5); a sample test is:
public void testPageShouldHaveRequiredComponents() {
WicketTester wt = new WicketTester();
wt.startPage(new
SummaryPage(JobPostCreatorHelper.createJobPost()));
wt.assertLabel(company.name,
JobPostCreatorHelper.COMPANY_NAME);
wt.assertLabel(company.description,
JobPostCreatorHelper.COMPANY_DESCRIPTION);
}
The test runs fine, but the logs are filled with exceptions like:
ERROR - RequestCycle - The component(s) below failed to
render. A common problem is that you have added a component in code
but forgot to reference it in the markup (thus the component will
never be rendered).
1. [MarkupContainer [Component id = _body, page =
board.pages.SummaryPage, path = 0:_body.HtmlBodyContainer, isVisible
= true, isVersioned = true]]
2. [Component id = company.name, page =board.pages.SummaryPage, path =
0:company.name.Label, isVisible = true, isVersioned = true]
All the components are logged as 'not rendered', but all tests are
passed and the application works.
Is this the normal behaviour of tests?
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
http://www.jugmilano.it
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-Javaee Release
On 2/23/07, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the present release only compatible with Wicket2? I am using Wicket 1.2.4. Can I use the present Wicket-javaee release with wicket 1.2.x? Hi, the current release of wicket-javaee (1.0) is compatible and tested with Wicket 1.2.4 and 1.2.5, but not compatible with the upcoming Wicket 2.0. -- Filippo Diotalevi http://www.diotalevi.com - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Release wicket-contrib-tinyMce?
On 2/13/07, Iulian Costan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey Filippo, yes, i've been thinking for a while to release 1.0 version but couldnt make it till now. yes, please do it, if you are kind enough to help me, that will be great. as well pom files need little clean up as well, but that's another story Ok, I'll have a look at it in the weekend. -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Release wicket-contrib-tinyMce?
Hi, I've been asked about wicket-contrib-tinyMce (project maintainer: Iulian Costan), and I've noticed that there's no official jar published on sourceforge (check https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=134391 ) I see that there's some interest on the list about this project... what do you think of releasing an official jar? I can do that, if Iulian has no time/interest , and if you think the library is stable. WDYT? -- Filippo Diotalevi http://www.diotalevi.com - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket Stuff Wiki update + shout out to all you lurking contributors...
On 2/4/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I've given http://wicketstuff.org a bit of love. Let me know what you think. Better yet, all you wicket stuff contributors please contribute to the wiki. :) Al, thank you for your contribution! WicketStuff looks really nice now... really better than my previous quick-and-ugly design. -- Filippo Diotalevi http://www.diotalevi.com - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Wicket-contrib-javaee 1.0 release
Hi, just a quick post to announce that tonight I've released the first public version of wicket-contrib-javaee (1.0), a module for Wicket that provides integration with Java EE 5 With wicket-javaee you can use in your wicket pages three annotations * @EJB * @PersistenceUnit * @Resource This release works with Wicket 1.2.x; a version for Wicket 2 is under construction. The release is available at: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=134391package_id=219263 the documentation is available at: http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/wicket-contrib-javaee -- Filippo Diotalevi http://www.diotalevi.com http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] integrate Wicket stuff examples projects
On 1/20/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just filed http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-227, which we are considering because of an offline discussion we had on how to cut down on maintenance for the core projects. [] * wicket-contrib-beanpanels (create examples from scratch?) I have some examples for beanpanels, but I'd like to wait some weeks just to have some more stable code. -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar forwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
On 1/20/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/20/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand the whole issue: the idea is to move wicket-stuff outside of Sourceforge? Why is the provided URL just an ip address? Yeah, I ported quite all the contents of the old website in the new one. There's also a Jira installation ready to be used. Feel free to contribute enhancing the pages I created. Hopefully we'll have a domain name soon, so we'll be able to make the switch. -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Custom web form in Wicket
On 1/16/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, ok. In that case, you should move the project from trunk to the 1.3 branch in the wicket-stuff project. Trunk is reserved for 2.0 projects. I regularly update those projects (like last weekend) when there are API breaks. Hi, I moved the project in wicket-stuff/branches/wicket1.3 -- Filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Custom web form in Wicket
On 1/16/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Definitively not the easiest task! Cool you are picking it up; I'll be sure to give it a look every now and then :) Will it be 2.0 only? Hi Eelco, no, we're developing with Wicket 1.X. And we are on heavy development right now, so expect *a lot* a API changes! -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Changing localized labels after costructor
On 1/14/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: add(new Label(foo, new ResourceModel(header))) ? Yeah, it was really that simple! Thanks -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar for wicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
On 1/9/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, we can't use Apache's infrastructure for wicket-stuff. However, we have a couple of servers available that are not related to Apache I believe. Eelco Eelco, are there any news with this regard? -- Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar for wicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
On 1/11/07, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Confluence is setup here: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/ Sorry guys... I don't get it. You've said in another thread that we cannot use apache infrastructure for wicket-stuff.. right? So, if I understand well, that instance of confluence you are referring to is not available for wicket-stuff documentation; but Eelco also said that there is probably another server with a confluence installation. That's the reason of my question... is this other server available? -- Filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar forwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
On 1/11/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://81.17.46.170:8090/confluence sign up for an account and i will grant you permissions Great Job igor! I've just signed up with the account 'fdiotalevi' -- Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar forwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, on second thought, there is hardly anything in the sf issue tracker for wicket-stuff, so there wouldn't be any migration issues. I didn't realize Jira could be part of the package. If others agree, and it wouldn't be to difficult for you, it would be great to have Jira and Confluence together. Yeah, absolutely. +1 for Jira Jira rocks! -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar forwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
On 1/11/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you guys need to first decide how you want to organize confluence. space per project? one wiki, one website? who has admin to what? A workspace per project seems a bit overkill to me, since for every workspaces we should create design, templates, logos and permission. And there are quite a lot of subprojects right now. I'd go with a read-only (for normal users) website, and let the project maintainers use the public wiki to create subprojects documentations (we will proide them a template for the project page) Then we could simply link from the website the pages in the wiki. Quite simple. -- Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jarforwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
On 1/11/07, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cant you force confluence to just extend the basic template? - e.g: only have a manipulatable sub-part in the main-template similar to what you do in CMS like typo3 ? I don't think so. Templates are page templates, so you can create some basic templates, but it's up to the editor to choose the right template for the page he's writing. -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-stuff site (Was: Re: Jar forwicket-contrib-scriptaculous?)
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm with Filippo. +1 for one wiki, one web site. Let's keep it real simple off the bat and not create any administrative headaches. Most projects have only one maintainer, and there are no separate mailing lists. We should be able to evolve into spaces later, if necessary. Yes. Let me just add that every subprojects will have *at most* 4-5 pages of documentation. Do we really want to create a whole workspace, user and the like just for 4-5 pages? -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Jar for wicket-contrib-scriptaculous?
On 1/9/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, James, Korbinian and Filippo... any plans of creating some releases (see http://www.nabble.com/who-wants-to-be-in-charge-of-doing-wicket-stuff-releases-tf2665134.html)? Yes... and we really need to setup a new site for wicket-stuff now it's so outdated that most of the subprojects of wicket-stuff aren't even documented in the website. And if we don't have a decent website, it's very difficult to keep track of the things to do. The problem is that there are so many people involved in wicket-stuff that it's nearly impossible to reach them all and make a democratic decision about the future of the website. In my opinion, we should drop the current website and use a wiki instead. It's the only simple way to manage the complexity of having so many projects, contributors and releases. We already have a wiki (http://wicket-stuff.sourceforge.net/wiki-stuff/WicketStuffWikiHome) but it is very simple and open to spammers, so I don't know if we should put too much effort in it or look for another platform. what do you think? -- Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Jar for wicket-contrib-scriptaculous?
On 1/9/07, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the current seems very basic to me, and i never heard about MoinMoin and its capabilities before - what wonders me, is if it would be possible to use confluence, as its used for wicket main so we would have only 1 technology / system and users/ contributors would only have 1 system to know... any thoughts on this? - can wicket-stuff also profit from apache or is this only for listed projects there? Yeah, I must admit that I'd prefer so much to go with confluence. With this regard, there are 3 possible solutions: - ask Atlassian for a free open source license. I've already done that, it requires some time (it required more than a month in my case). Then you need to find a java hosting... not impossible, but requires some work as well - As I told you, I already have a free license of Confluence for the Java User Group Milano. We are building our website with it, but it should be easy to add a workspace in our installation for wicket-stuff. However, wicket-stuff would probably be a medium-traffic website (much more than our), so I'd probably need to find another java hosting - Use Apache confluence.. needless to say, I'd love it! but we've already discussed about it and I remember some folks being not very enthusiastic about this solution -- Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Jar for wicket-contrib-scriptaculous?
On 1/9/07, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Filippo seems to have experience with confluence, however, I'm still wondering if we can use it, as i dont know a, how to get the license or if we may use the Apache ones for it b, on what server we will put it up - SF.net seems to limit to cgi only and I cant remember to have seen cgi option on the confluence webpage. Yes, I have some experience with confluence, and it's powerful but simple to use (customization can be a bit more tricky, but we might easily start using the default template). Furthermore, you can set up different 'workspaces', so you need just one license to create different wikis. If there's already confluence installation for wicket, I'd go with it, and I'd be happy to maintain it. -- Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] wicket-contrib-javaee moved to Wicket-Stuff
Hi all, just a quick post to say that this morning I've moved the wicket-javaEE integration module to the wicket-stuff svn repository. More details about this project are available at: http://code.google.com/p/fdiotalevi/wiki/WicketJavaEEIntegration The complete url to checkout the module is https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-javaee Remember that the integration module works only with wicket 2, which is still unreleased; so you'll need to checkout also the trunk of wicket 2 and build it with maven. At the moment, I still haven't investigated whether it's easy or not to backport this module to the wicket1.x branch; if someone is interested in using java ee with wicket 1.x, just let me know and I'll spend some time on this task. -- Filippo Diotalevi http://www.diotalevi.com - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-contrib-javaee moved to Wicket-Stuff
On 12/28/06, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Filippo, just browsed through it and its really nice work. Especially if someone wants to have EJB3 persitence but not to use EJB3 Stateless Session Beans to query it. However, the thing with the EjbAnnotation looks not so clear to me - i mean, every IDE has J5EE support and so in Neatbeans for example i just need 2 mouseclicks and i got my EJB called through a on the fly created call (including web.xml ref. update/creation) e.g: Hi Korbinian, yes, you are right, you can create your lookup methods (with your IDE or writing the classes), in the same way you can extract beans from Spring calling applicationContext.get(beanName). However, I prefer to write less code and let the infrastructure be responsible of doing all the boring stuff. Since Java EE 5 allows you to inject ejb dependencies through the @EJB annotation, I thought it would be useful to extend this functionality to wicket pages, in the same way we have @SpringBean annotation for injecting spring beans. -- Filippo Diotalevi - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-contrib-javaee moved to Wicket-Stuff
On 12/28/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: lets not forget the important part, assuming the ejb thing works just like wicket-spring. things injected are actually proxies not beans themselves. Yes Igor, I've used the same technique you adopted in the Wicket Spring integration. Things injected are serializable proxies -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket and Resource Injection in EJB3
On 12/20/06, Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/20/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How easy will it be to take advantage of container resource injection when deploying wicket as client tier in glassfish server for instance. Hi Ayodeji, as Igor has already pointed out, I've written a patch to extend JEE dependency injection to wicket pages. Hi all, I've updated the wicket-javaee integration module so that it now supports three java ee 5 annotations: @EJB, @PersistenceUnit and @Resource. You can find the patch attached to the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-174 In particular (sorry, I've made a bit of a mess with attachments) the module (with sources and mvn build) is at: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12347734/wicket-javaee-snapshot-1006.zip For the documentation check the page: http://code.google.com/p/fdiotalevi/wiki/WicketJavaEEIntegration where you'll also find two sample applications. -- Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket and Resource Injection in EJB3
On 12/22/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are we going to add this to core or as a wicket-stuff project? On 12/22/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But who is going to maintain it then? Adding stuff to our core is good and all, but it needs to be maintained. Personally I think the best lifecycle is to become a Wicket stuff project, make sure it grows community support and then vote it into core. Or find one (better: 2) core committer sponsor willing to support it. Hi, obviously I'd like it to be included in the core project ;-) , but it makes sense to me also to start including in wicket-stuff (I have committer access to wicket-stuff). Also, remember that it is a wicket 2 module, so hopefully there will be plenty of time to test it. And obviously the sponsors committer can count on me for support (it's a simple project anyway) -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's sound interesting. Is that old code still available somewhere? If you agree we could create a new wicket-stuff project starting from it. Thanks, Paolo Hi Paolo, I'm interested too in re-creating such a component in wicket-stuff... so count me in -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good question. I've found the BeanFormPanel source in a old 1.1.1 wicket-extensions release. If the project bean-edit is missing I could start it again together with Filippo. Yes! I've just done a quick check and the latest wicket-stuff revision with this project is the 639... (unfortunataly I'm not able to check it out... maybe some issues with my platform) Anyway, if you have the sourcecode of 1.1.1 it will be enough to start. -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, but it is possible to commit on wicket-stuff with an anonymous access? Paolo Not with an anonymous access, but I should also have commit access since I'm listed as 'developer' in wicket-stuff -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket and Resource Injection in EJB3
On 12/20/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How easy will it be to take advantage of container resource injection when
deploying wicket as client tier in glassfish server for instance.
Hi Ayodeji, as Igor has already pointed out, I've written a patch to
extend JEE dependency injection to wicket pages.
At the moment, the only supported annotation is @EJB, which means that
you have to write a stateless session bean which performs the
persistence logic, and use the @EJB annotation in your wicket pages.
Something like:
@Stateless
public class MyDao
{
@PersistenceContext EntityManager em;
public void create(PersistentObject po)
{
//
and
public class MyWicketServlet extends WicketServlet
{
@EJB private MyDao dao;
//...
IMHO using the EntityManager API directly in the web page is not so
elegant, nevertheless it shouldn't be difficult to add this
functionality.
--
Filippo Diotalevi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog
http://www.jugmilano.it
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket and Resource Injection in EJB3
On 12/20/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: take a look at @SpringBean, it would be trivial to extend the base clases to create an @EjbBean or some such to inject directly into components, all you need is to implement IFieldValueFactory to do that Yes... the @EJB annotation support, which is in the patch (WICKET-174 ), works exacly as @SpringBean (I borrowed quite a lot of code). I'll add support also for @PersistenceContext and @Resource -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-scriptaculous release
On 12/11/06, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey wicket users, Just wanted to let everyone know I just released the first version of the wicket-contrib-scriptaculous project. It's based on wicket-2.0, so it might not work for everyone, but give it a try if your interested! http://jroller.com/page/wireframe/?anchor=wicket_scriptaculous_snapshot_release wicket-stuff admins: Not sure where the wicket-stuff repository is, so this release is hosted on my public maven repository ( http://maven.codecrate.com) Congrats Ryan! as a side note, we really need to update the wicket-stuff website, since only a few of the wicket-stuff subprojects are documented... Ryan, do you have any documentation for wicket-contrib-scriptaculous ? we could start putting it on the wiki, e.g. in this page: http://wicket-stuff.sourceforge.net/wiki-stuff/WicketContribScriptaculous -- filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket-Stuff: ProjectMantainers page updated
On 11/22/06, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great. I'm thinking maybe we need a second ProjectStatus page, since I believe the amount of status info is going to grow. This would have info such as Notes, Current Versions, Maven support, and possibly a TODO list for each project. Or each project can have a project status page, but I would still like one summary page to see it all at a glance. What d you think? Hi James (sorry for the late answer.. I was abroad not connected to the internet) I agree with you: there are a lot of data to collect and, overall, a lot of things to do. I'm in favour of creating a single page for each project with all the details we need *and* a todolist for each project. Each of this page eventually might become the official page of the project, if we decide to use the wiki as website. I see also that there are a lot of projects whose mantainer is unknown... I think we should clearly decide what to do with them, because abandoned projects will rapidly become unusable with 1.3 and 2.0 -- Filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Wicket-Stuff: ProjectMantainers page updated
Hi all, I've updated the new page ProjectMantainer in the wicketstuff-wiki with (hopefully) all the projects of wicketstuff. Please take a minute to see it and update with correct infos. http://wicket-stuff.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/ProjectMaintainers I think we particularly need to know if: - a project has been discontinued - a project is up-to-date with current Wicket release - a project is Wicket 1.3-ready - a project is Wicket 2.0-ready -- Filippo Diotalevi http://www.diotalevi.com - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket stuff stuff
On 11/22/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would suggest making the wiki the main documentation page. The maven doc generation needs some understanding and not many have the time to learn it. +1 for the wiki... there are a lot of projects in wicket-stuff, and it would be difficult to mantain a regular website updated -- Filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket stuff stuff
On 11/22/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can't we set up a space for wicket-stuff which content we don't attribute to the ASF, but provide as a documentation ground for the wicket-stuff project? I'd rather have the documentation together in one place than scattered across the internets. That would be great, and also better from the user point of view -- Filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] who wants to be in charge of doing wicket-stuffreleases
On 11/21/06, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Korbinian, I'm a bit time constrained also, but if you take the lead I will help you out. If you want to enlarge the team with a third person, you can count on me as well (as assistant, I am also quite busy...) -- Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog http://www.jugmilano.it - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket stuff stuff
On 11/21/06, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've take a brief look at all the wicket-stuff projects, and here are some things I think need to be done. Well done. However, i think it will be difficult to keep track of this discussion in the mailing list. Can we use a wiki instead? For example, can we use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/ ? It would be much easier IMHO... -- Filippo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] who wants to be in charge of doingwicket-stuffreleases
On 11/21/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you give me the sourceforge ids you want to use for this, I'll be happy to add you guys. My sourceforge id is fdiotalevi -- Filippo Diotalevi http://www.diotalevi.com - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
