[WikiEducator] WE Phase 3.0
Dear all, As Dr. Wayne has suggested I have added my suggestions on Phase 3 at the talk page. http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator_talk:WikiEducator_3.0 Let us give high priority to Monthly News letter because it will help as in project co-ordination to a greater extent. We may forward the news letter to other stake holders also. For that a separate mailing list may be maintained. We may start a new page to coordinate the inception activities. http:www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator:NewsLetter is it ok? I would also like to propose to start a separate technical discussion for News Letter. Warm regards Anil On Dec 8, 8:49 am, Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Anil, These are very important suggestions for our future strategic planning --- Please add these suggestions to our strategic planning page here: http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:WikiEducator_3.0 You're right there is a growing need for additional tutorials on helping newbies with questions like where to start a new page --- we've made a humble start here: http://www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_tutorial/Developing_a_teachi... but still lots of room for improvement and additional resources we can develop to help newbies in becoming part of our community. We definitely need to improve our structure and categorisation of content in the wiki. We've made a start with the content info box template -- but this is still prototype and we need to test its functionality. Once we've tested and refined this template, we'll need to develop supporting tutorials on its use. See, for instance: http://www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_tutorial/Developing_a_teachi... We're hoping to include improved content listings using portal pages for the School sector, Higher Education, TVET and professional development, see for example: http://www.wikieducator.org/Portal:Primaryhttp://www.wikieducator.org/Portal:Secondaryhttp://www.wikieducator.org/Portal:Higher_Education.. etc. However -- we still need to implement this properly. I really like the idea of a monthly newsletter -- and it would be great if we could identify a group of volunteers to assist with compiling a community newsletter. A while back we introduced a page starting to plot different roles in the community -- perhaps we need to revisit and improve this concept. All ideas welcome: http://www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_Roles Thanks Anil -- great suggestions. Lets get them implemented. Cheers Wayne On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 08:57 +0530, aprasad wrote: Dear Dr. Wayne, Randy and other friends, Connecting to an earlier thread about the urgent requirement of teacher education in ZA, we have to offer support officially. Before that we require some urgent and very basic preparations. For example, WE has now a very good repository of learning content…but as pointed out by many earlier, collaboration happens seldom. In our L4C Workshops we have to give greater emphasis on the best wiki practice on 'where to start a new page?' Now it is time to take this vital structural issue seriously. We have to take special care to avoid the situation wherein valuable content lay scattered, and we move towards creating another wikipedia, rather than learning content supportive to QFs and Curricula. A monthly e-News letter to introduce major events, new projects and higlighting the progress in existing projects may be started to facilitate collaboration. Another thing we should do is to keep panels of WEs with specific experience and aptitude that can help us in the event of WE taking up projects officially. There should be a system to enlist names and other details voluntarily by members and a verification process to ensure the reliability. Online Volunteering project of UN http://www.onlinevolunteering.org/en/index.htmland Professional Educational Organization Internationalhttp://www.peoi.org/are doing the same successfully for years. These aspects may be examined for incorporating in Phase 3 of WE that is being developed. -- Warm regards Anil http://wikieducator.org/User:Anil_Prasad http://wikieducator.org/India http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Educatio... Skype: apletters On 12/8/08, Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Randy, Good thinking Randy --- there are many strategic elements in your post, which I think we need to incorporate into our evolving strategy for the future: http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:WikiEducator_3.0 Thinking about Professional Development, clearly this is an important node for development. Thinking about the value proposition, there are two important reasons why an OER approach to professional development makes so much sense: 1) Almost every tertiary education institution has a
[WikiEducator] Re: WE Phase 3.0
Hi Anil, Great work! A suggestion... I recall mentioning this idea to Leigh awhile back Maybe we could source some journalism types (i.e., students, or up and coming folks) to develop content for such a newsletter It would be a great experience for them, as well as building up a profiletasks could be news and events, profiles of wiki personalities, and projects, and feature stories. - Randy On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, As Dr. Wayne has suggested I have added my suggestions on Phase 3 at the talk page. http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator_talk:WikiEducator_3.0 Let us give high priority to Monthly News letter because it will help as in project co-ordination to a greater extent. We may forward the news letter to other stake holders also. For that a separate mailing list may be maintained. We may start a new page to coordinate the inception activities. http:www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator:NewsLetter is it ok? I would also like to propose to start a separate technical discussion for News Letter. Warm regards Anil On Dec 8, 8:49 am, Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Anil, These are very important suggestions for our future strategic planning --- Please add these suggestions to our strategic planning page here: http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:WikiEducator_3.0 You're right there is a growing need for additional tutorials on helping newbies with questions like where to start a new page --- we've made a humble start here: http://www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_tutorial/Developing_a_teachi... but still lots of room for improvement and additional resources we can develop to help newbies in becoming part of our community. We definitely need to improve our structure and categorisation of content in the wiki. We've made a start with the content info box template -- but this is still prototype and we need to test its functionality. Once we've tested and refined this template, we'll need to develop supporting tutorials on its use. See, for instance: http://www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_tutorial/Developing_a_teachi... We're hoping to include improved content listings using portal pages for the School sector, Higher Education, TVET and professional development, see for example: http://www.wikieducator.org/Portal:Primaryhttp://www.wikieducator.org/Portal:Secondaryhttp://www.wikieducator.org/Portal:Higher_Education.. etc. However -- we still need to implement this properly. I really like the idea of a monthly newsletter -- and it would be great if we could identify a group of volunteers to assist with compiling a community newsletter. A while back we introduced a page starting to plot different roles in the community -- perhaps we need to revisit and improve this concept. All ideas welcome: http://www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_Roles Thanks Anil -- great suggestions. Lets get them implemented. Cheers Wayne On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 08:57 +0530, aprasad wrote: Dear Dr. Wayne, Randy and other friends, Connecting to an earlier thread about the urgent requirement of teacher education in ZA, we have to offer support officially. Before that we require some urgent and very basic preparations. For example, WE has now a very good repository of learning content…but as pointed out by many earlier, collaboration happens seldom. In our L4C Workshops we have to give greater emphasis on the best wiki practice on 'where to start a new page?' Now it is time to take this vital structural issue seriously. We have to take special care to avoid the situation wherein valuable content lay scattered, and we move towards creating another wikipedia, rather than learning content supportive to QFs and Curricula. A monthly e-News letter to introduce major events, new projects and higlighting the progress in existing projects may be started to facilitate collaboration. Another thing we should do is to keep panels of WEs with specific experience and aptitude that can help us in the event of WE taking up projects officially. There should be a system to enlist names and other details voluntarily by members and a verification process to ensure the reliability. Online Volunteering project of UN http://www.onlinevolunteering.org/en/index.htmland Professional Educational Organization Internationalhttp://www.peoi.org/are doing the same successfully for years. These aspects may be examined for incorporating in Phase 3 of WE that is being developed. -- Warm regards Anil http://wikieducator.org/User:Anil_Prasad http://wikieducator.org/India http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Educatio. .. Skype: apletters On 12/8/08, Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Randy,
[WikiEducator] Re: Teachers Should Be Trained for Free (South Africa news article)
Dear Anil, I'm involved with both UNV and PEOI and though both are very good there could be some issues with quality. E.g. in the case of UNV online translation review can be problematic/inexistent and in the case of PEOI, course author copyright might deter part of the peer-review benefits. Just food for thought for they're both excellent and actually think there could be potential WE-PEOI synergies for the textbook project (?). Cheers, Alex De: wikieducator@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de aprasad Enviado el: lunes, 08 de diciembre de 2008 4:28 Para: wikieducator@googlegroups.com Asunto: [WikiEducator] Re: Teachers Should Be Trained for Free (South Africa news article) Dear Dr. Wayne, Randy and other friends, Connecting to an earlier thread about the urgent requirement of teacher education in ZA, we have to offer support officially. Before that we require some urgent and very basic preparations. For example, WE has now a very good repository of learning content.but as pointed out by many earlier, collaboration happens seldom. In our L4C Workshops we have to give greater emphasis on the best wiki practice on 'where to start a new page?' Now it is time to take this vital structural issue seriously. We have to take special care to avoid the situation wherein valuable content lay scattered, and we move towards creating another wikipedia, rather than learning content supportive to QFs and Curricula. A monthly e-News letter to introduce major events, new projects and higlighting the progress in existing projects may be started to facilitate collaboration. Another thing we should do is to keep panels of WEs with specific experience and aptitude that can help us in the event of WE taking up projects officially. There should be a system to enlist names and other details voluntarily by members and a verification process to ensure the reliability. Online Volunteering project of UN http://www.onlinevolunteering.org/en/index.html http://www.onlinevolunteering.org/en/index.html and Professional Educational Organization International http://www.peoi.org/ http://www.peoi.org/ are doing the same successfully for years. These aspects may be examined for incorporating in Phase 3 of WE that is being developed. -- Warm regards Anil http://wikieducator.org/User:Anil_Prasad http://wikieducator.org/User:Anil_Prasad http://wikieducator.org/India http://wikieducator.org/India http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Education/Mana gement/MHRM http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Education/Manag ement/MHRM Skype: apletters On 12/8/08, Wayne mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Randy, Good thinking Randy --- there are many strategic elements in your post, which I think we need to incorporate into our evolving strategy for the future: http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:WikiEducator_3.0 http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:WikiEducator_3.0 Thinking about Professional Development, clearly this is an important node for development. Thinking about the value proposition, there are two important reasons why an OER approach to professional development makes so much sense: 1) Almost every tertiary education institution has a professional development unit -- yet in my experience most are not adequately resourced in terms of staff or budget to do what needs to be done on campus. 2) An OER approach to professional development should theoretically be less threatening to institutions testing the OER waters because PD courses for academic staff are not necessarily courses on which institutions compete with each other. Back in the early conceptualisation phases of WikiEducator (i.e. before we moved to a hosted server solution) -- on 19 March 2006 I set up a PD development node on WE envisioning rapid growth ( http://www.wikieducator.org/index.php?title=Professional_Development_(eLear ning_and_Instructional_Design)oldid=1807 http://www.wikieducator.org/index.php?title=Professional_Development_(eLearn ing_and_Instructional_Design)oldid=1807 ) -- However, I suspect that the idea was premature and poorly implemented :-), especially given that at the time we only had 10 registered accounts! (Wow -- can you believe that we're nearing the threshold of 7000 users!) So I thinking the timing is right to progress this further. With reference to your suggested refinements on the L4C initiative -- again the timing is just right from a strategic point of view. The current iterration of L4C will run to 30 June 2009 -- as determined by our external funding support from Hewlett. We need to start thinking about where we take L4C in the future --- and I really like your ideas for refocusing and reconfiguring the initiative. I'd be keen to hear what folk think? How should WE provide support for capacity
[WikiEducator] Re: Building a sustainable WE OER Textbook initiative
Maria - Dream on... This is the sort of thing that I have been working on as well. With my very WikiEducator-centric view, I think that wikipages might be part of the process. Paths, sequences, study guides, or some such designation could be created to include activities and links to other learning objects - just as you suggest. These could be created by instructors for their own use, by learners as a product of their own learning and discovery and/or as a collaboration by a community of practice. Because they live in WE they could be tagged to indicate that they are intended / available for aggregating. If this were a perfect world.. the aggregates would be helpful as recommendations or referrals. Then there could be some magic that does all the things you suggest - customize the display to the learner's selections and specification Finding and using these great resources is really important and interesting. Thanks for the wonderful ideas and comments. ..vt On Dec 6, 3:33 am, Maria Droujkova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to describe a system we have started to develop in the family multiplication study. The reusable objects there are small according to... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups WikiEducator group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[WikiEducator] Re: WE Phase 3.0
What do we have happening Monthly already? We have featured user pages We have Anil summerising significant discussions We have featured OER We have reports from L4C workshops We could have reports from other courses On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Randy Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Anil, Great work! A suggestion... I recall mentioning this idea to Leigh awhile back Maybe we could source some journalism types (i.e., students, or up and coming folks) to develop content for such a newsletter It would be a great experience for them, as well as building up a profiletasks could be news and events, profiles of wiki personalities, and projects, and feature stories. - Randy On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Anil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, As Dr. Wayne has suggested I have added my suggestions on Phase 3 at the talk page. http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator_talk:WikiEducator_3.0 Let us give high priority to Monthly News letter because it will help as in project co-ordination to a greater extent. We may forward the news letter to other stake holders also. For that a separate mailing list may be maintained. We may start a new page to coordinate the inception activities. http:www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator:NewsLetter is it ok? I would also like to propose to start a separate technical discussion for News Letter. Warm regards Anil On Dec 8, 8:49 am, Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Anil, These are very important suggestions for our future strategic planning --- Please add these suggestions to our strategic planning page here: http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:WikiEducator_3.0 You're right there is a growing need for additional tutorials on helping newbies with questions like where to start a new page --- we've made a humble start here: http://www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_tutorial/Developing_a_teachi. .. but still lots of room for improvement and additional resources we can develop to help newbies in becoming part of our community. We definitely need to improve our structure and categorisation of content in the wiki. We've made a start with the content info box template -- but this is still prototype and we need to test its functionality. Once we've tested and refined this template, we'll need to develop supporting tutorials on its use. See, for instance: http://www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_tutorial/Developing_a_teachi. .. We're hoping to include improved content listings using portal pages for the School sector, Higher Education, TVET and professional development, see for example: http://www.wikieducator.org/Portal:Primaryhttp://www.wikieducator.org/Portal:Secondaryhttp://www.wikieducator.org/Portal:Higher_Education.. etc. However -- we still need to implement this properly. I really like the idea of a monthly newsletter -- and it would be great if we could identify a group of volunteers to assist with compiling a community newsletter. A while back we introduced a page starting to plot different roles in the community -- perhaps we need to revisit and improve this concept. All ideas welcome: http://www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_Roles Thanks Anil -- great suggestions. Lets get them implemented. Cheers Wayne On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 08:57 +0530, aprasad wrote: Dear Dr. Wayne, Randy and other friends, Connecting to an earlier thread about the urgent requirement of teacher education in ZA, we have to offer support officially. Before that we require some urgent and very basic preparations. For example, WE has now a very good repository of learning content…but as pointed out by many earlier, collaboration happens seldom. In our L4C Workshops we have to give greater emphasis on the best wiki practice on 'where to start a new page?' Now it is time to take this vital structural issue seriously. We have to take special care to avoid the situation wherein valuable content lay scattered, and we move towards creating another wikipedia, rather than learning content supportive to QFs and Curricula. A monthly e-News letter to introduce major events, new projects and higlighting the progress in existing projects may be started to facilitate collaboration. Another thing we should do is to keep panels of WEs with specific experience and aptitude that can help us in the event of WE taking up projects officially. There should be a system to enlist names and other details voluntarily by members and a verification process to ensure the reliability. Online Volunteering project of UN http://www.onlinevolunteering.org/en/index.htmland Professional Educational Organization Internationalhttp://www.peoi.org/are doing the same successfully for years. These aspects may be examined for incorporating in Phase 3 of WE that is being developed. -- Warm regards Anil
[WikiEducator] Re: WikiEducator goes non-violent?
Günther, I'm surprised your message calling for an examination of what relationship WE could have with nonviolence didn't get more attention. It sounds interesting, but there are aspects to this that I would want to explore further. For example, the four listed guidelines use terms that mean different things to different people, and which seem to go beyond what I would strictly think of as nonviolence. For example, respect for life often has contentious connotations about abortion, and both socialists and libertarians (in the American sense) believe theirs is the just economic order. Instead of starting with an attempt to draft a set of ethics for WE, it might be better to start by using WE to collaborate on building curricula on nonviolence studies? -=Steve=- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups WikiEducator group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[WikiEducator] Re: WikiEducator goes non-violent?
Can you describe what violent behavior and content might look like in Wikieducator? On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Randy Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Sometimes messages get buried because of the title, or folks are just screening for one or two topics. Regarding nonviolence, it's likely known by other names to: peacebuilding is one. - Randy On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Steve Foerster [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Günther, I'm surprised your message calling for an examination of what relationship WE could have with nonviolence didn't get more attention. It sounds interesting, but there are aspects to this that I would want to explore further. For example, the four listed guidelines use terms that mean different things to different people, and which seem to go beyond what I would strictly think of as nonviolence. For example, respect for life often has contentious connotations about abortion, and both socialists and libertarians (in the American sense) believe theirs is the just economic order. Instead of starting with an attempt to draft a set of ethics for WE, it might be better to start by using WE to collaborate on building curricula on nonviolence studies? -=Steve=- -- Randy Fisher - Change Management Collaboration, Human Performance Engagement, Sustainable Communities Organizations * Engaging People in Teams, Communities and Organizationsand WikiEducator! + 1 604.684.2275 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wikieducator.org http://www.wikieducator.org/Community_Media http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Randyfisher * Cool WikiEducator Video on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc9-CNlIqsY * Can You Do the Wiki-Wiki? http://www.wikieducator.org/Wiki_Wiki Skype: wikirandy -- -- Leigh Blackall +64(0)21736539 skype - leigh_blackall SL - Leroy Goalpost http://learnonline.wordpress.com http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Leighblackall --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups WikiEducator group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[WikiEducator] enough with copyleft, fair use/dealings is more important
Fair Use (and Dealings) is the right of educators, as it is for journalists and documentary makers. Instead of religiously playing into the hands of copyright fascism with strict adherence to copyleft (and so limiting our educational opportunities to only content meeting free cultural definitions), Wikieducator should aggressively lead the charge (in a non violent way) and stand up for Fair Use/Dealings, and grow the security of that ground for educators everywhere. http://blip.tv/file/1452933/ -- -- Leigh Blackall +64(0)21736539 skype - leigh_blackall SL - Leroy Goalpost http://learnonline.wordpress.com http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Leighblackall --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups WikiEducator group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[WikiEducator] Re: enough with copyleft, fair use/dealings is more important
Thanks Eric, was aware of that. And thought - given Wikieducators very clear focus on education, that we could take Wikipedia's lead even further On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Erik Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The two are by no means mutually exclusive. For example, Wikipedia has always had a strong position in favor of fair use and equivalent local law. See the licensing policy of the Wikimedia Foundation and its note on project/language-specific exemption doctrine policies (EDPs): http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Licensing_policy And, a list of policies on copyright exemptions in various Wikipedia languages and projects: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/EDP Erik 2008/12/8 Leigh Blackall [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fair Use (and Dealings) is the right of educators, as it is for journalists and documentary makers. Instead of religiously playing into the hands of copyright fascism with strict adherence to copyleft (and so limiting our educational opportunities to only content meeting free cultural definitions), Wikieducator should aggressively lead the charge (in a non violent way) and stand up for Fair Use/Dealings, and grow the security of that ground for educators everywhere. http://blip.tv/file/1452933/ -- -- Leigh Blackall +64(0)21736539 skype - leigh_blackall SL - Leroy Goalpost http://learnonline.wordpress.com http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Leighblackall -- Erik Möller Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate -- -- Leigh Blackall +64(0)21736539 skype - leigh_blackall SL - Leroy Goalpost http://learnonline.wordpress.com http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Leighblackall --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups WikiEducator group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[WikiEducator] Re: WikiEducator goes non-violent?
If we include coercive in the definition of violent then forcing kids learn is an example of violent content. As a math educator, I see a lot of kiddie torture related to my subject. This is also a good example of how varied our definitions of violent behavior can be. I meet very few people who share that definition. On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Leigh Blackall [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Can you describe what violent behavior and content might look like in Wikieducator? -- Cheers, MariaD Make math your own, to make your own math. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups WikiEducator group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[WikiEducator] Re: WikiEducator goes non-violent?
Hi All, Why doesn't someone create a page with all of the meanings our community folk see - then it might be easier to identify content and/or projects of interest? - Randy On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Maria Droujkova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If we include coercive in the definition of violent then forcing kids learn is an example of violent content. As a math educator, I see a lot of kiddie torture related to my subject. This is also a good example of how varied our definitions of violent behavior can be. I meet very few people who share that definition. On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Leigh Blackall [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Can you describe what violent behavior and content might look like in Wikieducator? -- Cheers, MariaD Make math your own, to make your own math. -- Randy Fisher - Change Management Collaboration, Human Performance Engagement, Sustainable Communities Organizations * Engaging People in Teams, Communities and Organizationsand WikiEducator! + 1 604.684.2275 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wikieducator.org http://www.wikieducator.org/Community_Media http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Randyfisher * Cool WikiEducator Video on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc9-CNlIqsY * Can You Do the Wiki-Wiki? http://www.wikieducator.org/Wiki_Wiki Skype: wikirandy --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups WikiEducator group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
