Re: [Wikimedia-l] law enforcement buying vulnerabilities on black market leaving them unreported for surveillance

2013-08-20 Thread Seb35
I aggree with JP Béland: the computer security obviously affects the  
Wikimedia users, but imho we shouldn’t do more than we can and let the  
responsability of their own security to the users -- although we should  
contribute for a decent security.


For the specific topic you brought about 0-days, I’m not personnaly  
surprised, this type of market was revealed some time ago, see for  
instance  
http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/03/23/shopping-for-zero-days-an-price-list-for-hackers-secret-software-exploits/.


~ Seb35


Le Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:30:09 +0200, JP Béland lebo.bel...@gmail.com a  
écrit:

I'm not sure what is your point here. How exactly readers of Wikimedia
projects are at risk here because of that story? Are you trying to say it
is the Foundation responsibility to protect the readers from the
vulnerabilities of their operating systems?

JP Béland



2013/8/19 James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com


While the trickling release of Edward Snowden's revelations from bad to
worse in weekly incremental steps has been enormously effective in  
swaying

public opinion, it has made formulating a meaningful response very
difficult.

A few weeks ago we learned that the FBI has been purchasing personal
computer operating system vulnerabilities from gray and black-hat  
hackers
on the black market, often for several tens of thousands of dollars  
each,

and leaving them unreported and thereby unpatched for use in future
surveillance operations:
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/08/01/how-the-fbi-hacks-criminal-suspects/

Unfortunately, this means that the vulnerabilities remain available to  
the

criminal computer crime underground, affecting everyone including
Foundation project readers and contributors alike.

Very recently a well respected group of researchers characterized this
state of affairs as preferable to the complexity of additional
surveillance network and systems infrastructure:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2312107

This is a false dichotomy which directly places Foundation project  
readers

and editors at risk, but does so along with virtually everyone else who
uses personal computer or smartphone equipment. However, I think it is  
an
important aspect to address because none of the other recent  
eavesdropping
revelations put people at risk to organized computer crime, blackmail,  
and

extortion in the same way.

Is there any reason to exclude action on a particular issue just  
because it

effects everyone else along with our users?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,  
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe


___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wikimedia-l] Hong Kong diary

2013-08-20 Thread Ziko van Dijk
Dear friends of free knowledge,

Over the past days I have been approached by many of you with kind remarks
on the experimental WCA year; actually, I am fine and looking forward to
finish some work discussed on in Hong Kong. (Let yourself be surprised. :-)
) Thank you, and see you again soon in Wikimedia country.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ziko/Hong_Kong_diary

Kind regards
Ziko


Dr. Ziko van Dijk
voorzitter / president Wikimedia Nederland

Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland
Postbus 167
3500 AD Utrecht
http://wikimedia.nl

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Hong Kong diary

2013-08-20 Thread Pavlo Shevelo
Hello Ziko,

I like your diary very much and I just love your point regarding fundamental
lack of political education among the activists.

Regards,
Pavlo



On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Ziko van Dijk vand...@wmnederland.nlwrote:

 Dear friends of free knowledge,

 Over the past days I have been approached by many of you with kind remarks
 on the experimental WCA year; actually, I am fine and looking forward to
 finish some work discussed on in Hong Kong. (Let yourself be surprised. :-)
 ) Thank you, and see you again soon in Wikimedia country.
 http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ziko/Hong_Kong_diary

 Kind regards
 Ziko


 
 Dr. Ziko van Dijk
 voorzitter / president Wikimedia Nederland

 Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland
 Postbus 167
 3500 AD Utrecht
 http://wikimedia.nl

 
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] An idea that may improve Wikipedia's fundraising

2013-08-20 Thread Zack Exley
Sue:

I also hate the idea of premiums. We will never want to do lame premiums.
But there may in the future be a cool thing to offer with donations, who
knows -- so why limit ourselves by saying we will never ever do something?

Zack




On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 A supportive anecdote for you, Matt:

 Back in 2008, I got toured through the fundraising operation of one of the
 major American public broadcasters. It had a large fundraising team that
 included a group dedicated solely to tracking and shipping premiums. Its
 boss advised us to avoid going down the premiums road: he said once you
 start it's very difficult to stop, because donors grow to expect them. I
 remember being reminded of a study, I think by Dan Ariely, in which he
 found that if you offer people small material incentives for doing
 something, they begin to see the transaction in self-interested terms, and
 the incentive can end up being viewed as too small -- insulting, and not
 good value. Essentially IIRC small material incentives can have the effect
 of shifting people from an intrinsically-motivated mindset (donor) into a
 transactional mindset (economically-self-interested rational actor).

 So, I agree with you that before we instituted premiums, we'd want to think
 long and hard about what benefits they would bring, and what unintended
 consequences might result.

 Thanks,
 Sue
 On Aug 15, 2013 4:20 AM, Matthew Walker mwal...@wikimedia.org wrote:

  Technology limitations aside, there are two things we throw around in
 the
  team a lot; that we should not give the impression that a user *must*
 pay
  to use a WMF property, and that we will never ever do gift premiums.
 
  This sounds a bit like Fundraising principles or similar. Are these
  documented anywhere (e.g. on Meta-Wiki)? If not, I think it'd be great
 to
  start a page. :-)
 
  In the past days there's been discussion internal to the fundraising team
  -- it appears that the 'fundraising principles' I thought we held are not
  uniformly held by others. In this particular instance it seems that gift
  premiums are not entirely off the table. I've been told that the reason
 we
  have not done them in the past is mostly due to technical limitations.
 The
  current view is that we should keep our options open to future
  experimentation if the situation allows.
 
  personal hat
  At this I'll take off my foundation hat and state that I remain firmly
  opposed to gift premiums being used as a donation incitement. I hope that
  if we do, at some point, press forward and experiment with premiums that,
  before this happens, ...
  - We show reasonable evidence that the gain in monetary income will fully
  offset the new cost in managing gifts.
  - We either have some method to ship worldwide without subsidy; or we
  communicate beforehand that we will not be able to do this in some
 regions
  *and* that we understand and have a plan for the fallout that will
 probably
  cause.
  - We have premiums that actually mean something to the movement; e.g. you
  do not donate $100 and get a t-shirt.
  - We show reasonable evidence that if the experiment doesn't work that we
  will not have hurt our future donation prospects. (E.g. will people
 always
  expect premiums if we offer them once?)
  - That we have a solid communications plan in place to immediately offset
  any possible suggestion that you are 'buying' a piece of the foundation
  with your donation.
 
  Just my two cents.
  /personal hat
 
  ~Matt Walker
  Wikimedia Foundation
  Fundraising Technology Team
 
 
  On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:50 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
 
   Matthew Walker wrote:
   Technology limitations aside, there are two things we throw around in
  the
   team a lot; that we should not give the impression that a user *must*
  pay
   to use a WMF property, and that we will never ever do gift premiums.
  
   Hi Matt.
  
   This sounds a bit like Fundraising principles or similar. Are these
   documented anywhere (e.g. on Meta-Wiki)? If not, I think it'd be great
 to
   start a page. :-)
  
   MZMcBride
  
  
  
   ___
   Wikimedia-l mailing list
   Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
   Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
   mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
  
  ___
  Wikimedia-l mailing list
  Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
  mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe




-- 
Zack Exley
Chief Revenue Officer
Wikimedia Foundation

Re: [Wikimedia-l] An idea that may improve Wikipedia's fundraising

2013-08-20 Thread Peter Coombe
Yes MZ, agreed that this is would be good to have documented on meta. In
fact this has been raised in our internal discussion already.

At the moment one of my side projects is a major overhaul of the
fundraising pages on meta, and I plan to incorporate aims and principles
into this prominently. I'm hoping to post a draft in the next few weeks,
and will post to this list when I do.
On 19 Aug 2013 05:57, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:

 Matthew Walker wrote:
 In the past days there's been discussion internal to the fundraising team
 -- it appears that the 'fundraising principles' I thought we held are not
 uniformly held by others. In this particular instance it seems that gift
 premiums are not entirely off the table. I've been told that the reason we
 have not done them in the past is mostly due to technical limitations. The
 current view is that we should keep our options open to future
 experimentation if the situation allows.

 Hi.

 I think establishing fundraising principles and documenting them at
 Meta-Wiki would still be a great idea. Would you be able to start such a
 page if one doesn't exist already?

 Outside of purely fundraising techniques, establishing what is and is not
 appropriate for fundraising banners would also be nice to have. For
 example, are splash pages off the table? CentralNotice has previously been
 used to completely block out the site, so it's certainly technically
 possible. What about banners that obstruct or obfuscate article content?
 Are these ever acceptable? Is it okay to stretch the truth if it brings in
 more money (e.g., Wikipedia Executive Director)?

 I think clarity as to what the Wikimedia Foundation fundraising team
 considers appropriate or off-limits in order to reach its goals is
 very important to have.

 MZMcBride



 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Hong Kong diary

2013-08-20 Thread attolippip
yep. i strongly agree

'an understanding of some basic concepts and ideas' is really important, i
believe
but what-makes-wikiworld-go just doesn't seem to work within a 'formal'
organization
i wonder if a 'visible' hierarchy 'reverts' users into ordinary people...

ziko, thank you for sharing this!

best regards,
antanana


2013/8/20 Pavlo Shevelo pavlo.shev...@gmail.com

 Hello Ziko,

 I like your diary very much and I just love your point regarding
 fundamental
 lack of political education among the activists.

 Regards,
 Pavlo



 On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Ziko van Dijk vand...@wmnederland.nl
 wrote:

  Dear friends of free knowledge,
 
  Over the past days I have been approached by many of you with kind
 remarks
  on the experimental WCA year; actually, I am fine and looking forward to
  finish some work discussed on in Hong Kong. (Let yourself be surprised.
 :-)
  ) Thank you, and see you again soon in Wikimedia country.
  http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ziko/Hong_Kong_diary
 
  Kind regards
  Ziko
 
 
 
 
  Dr. Ziko van Dijk
  voorzitter / president Wikimedia Nederland
 
  Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland
  Postbus 167
  3500 AD Utrecht
  http://wikimedia.nl
 
 
 
  ___
  Wikimedia-l mailing list
  Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
  mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Hong Kong diary

2013-08-20 Thread Pavlo Shevelo
That's exactly what Ziko is talking about:
Hierarchy really 'reverts' users into real people, but moreover - it gives
them power to command the resources (people and money are just resources for
many of 'commanders'), and politics - how to gain ASAP and then to keep
...ALAP (as long as possible) the commandment position (through the
elections etc.).

...and that 'ordinary' people suffer of proper knowledge about power,
(democratic) procedures etc. (see the Ziko' explanation), but what is worse
- organisation suffers even more (much more).


On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:47 PM, attolippip attolip...@gmail.com wrote:

 yep. i strongly agree

 'an understanding of some basic concepts and ideas' is really important, i
 believe
 but what-makes-wikiworld-go just doesn't seem to work within a 'formal'
 organization
 i wonder if a 'visible' hierarchy 'reverts' users into ordinary people...

 ziko, thank you for sharing this!

 best regards,
 antanana


 2013/8/20 Pavlo Shevelo pavlo.shev...@gmail.com

  Hello Ziko,
 
  I like your diary very much and I just love your point regarding
  fundamental
  lack of political education among the activists.
 
  Regards,
  Pavlo
 
 
 
  On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Ziko van Dijk vand...@wmnederland.nl
  wrote:
 
   Dear friends of free knowledge,
  
   Over the past days I have been approached by many of you with kind
  remarks
   on the experimental WCA year; actually, I am fine and looking forward
 to
   finish some work discussed on in Hong Kong. (Let yourself be surprised.
  :-)
   ) Thank you, and see you again soon in Wikimedia country.
   http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ziko/Hong_Kong_diary
  
   Kind regards
   Ziko
  
  
  
 
 
   Dr. Ziko van Dijk
   voorzitter / president Wikimedia Nederland
  
   Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland
   Postbus 167
   3500 AD Utrecht
   http://wikimedia.nl
  
  
 
 
   ___
   Wikimedia-l mailing list
   Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
   Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
   mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
  ___
  Wikimedia-l mailing list
  Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
  mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
 
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Block evasion might be a federal offense

2013-08-20 Thread Nathan
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
 http://feedly.com/k/14WeLcY

 I wish I was grossly misrepresenting the situation here. If I am, please
 do
 set me straight.

 You're not wrong, but getting the attention of a federal prosecutor would
 be easier for jaywalking in a National Park. It applies only to extreme
 situations.

 Fred



I think you misread this, Fred. The case (Craigslist v. 3taps) is a
private entity suing another[1] for relief from violations of the
CFAA[2], and the article is about a recent ruling in that case.[3] The
Wikimedia analog might be the WMF suing Grawp (or similar) for
repeated violations of technological barriers (and other means) of
revoking access to the site. The ruling seems to establish that
Wikimedia is entitled to legally revoke access on a case by case
basis, and that an IP ban is a sufficient technological barrier to
meet the standard. At least that is the apparent state of the law in
the Northern District of California, which incidentally includes San
Francisco (and the WMF).

[1]: http://www.scribd.com/document_downloads/100933709?extension=pdffrom=embed
[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act
[3]: 
http://www.volokh.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Order-Denying-Renewed-Motion-to-Dismiss.pdf

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Block evasion might be a federal offense

2013-08-20 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)

Discussed several times with no clear outcome.
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2013-January/123678.html

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Terms_of_use/Archives/2011-10-06#WSJ_Op-Ed_.22Should_Faking_a_Name_on_Facebook_Be_a_Felony.3F.22
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Terms_of_use/Archives/2011-11-08#Is_this_enforceable.3F
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Terms_of_use/Archives/2011-12-13#Criminal_liability_for_breaching_the_TOU

Nemo

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wikimedia-l] Looking for Wikipedians to add already translated articles

2013-08-20 Thread James Heilman
We at WikiProject Medicine are working on a collaborative effort with
Translators Without Borders (TWB), a group which includes 2,000 or so
volunteer translators. We are working to translate key medical articles
into as many other languages as possible. Currently we have translated
content into 50 or so languages amounting to 2.3 million words of text.

The process involves first bringing articles to either GA or FA status in
English. They are then delivered, with MediaWiki markup in place, to the
TWB website where the text is sent out to the translators. Once translated
we at Wikipedia are notified via orange links on this page here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MED/Progress

This issue currently is that we are missing Wikipedians in some languages
to add / combine the translated content into the respective Wikipedia. Some
of the article created through this process have reached feature article
status including translations into Hungarian of anaphylaxis and
hypertension. We currently have translated content in the following
languages waiting to be integrated:

Hindi

Chinese

Persian

Tagalog

Indonesian

Macedonian

Greek

Bulgarian

Danish

Polish

Swedish

Arabic

Ukrainian

Dutch

Czech

Serbian

Slovenian

Spanish

Telugu

Tamil

Punjabi

Turkish

Kurdish

Thai

Swahili

Yoruba

Kinyarwanda

An overview of the efforts can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:TTF

If you are interested in getting involved in adding translated articles
instructions are here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Translation_task_force/Adding_content

If you have further question or comments I would welcome the feedback.

James Heilman

MD, CCFP(EM), Wikipedian

WikiProject Medicine

The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Looking for Wikipedians to add already translated articles

2013-08-20 Thread JP Béland
A big thank you to all the translations from TWB and for you James for
organizing that, this is a great project and awesome results!

Thanks!

JP Béland
aka Amqui


2013/8/20 James Heilman jmh...@gmail.com

 We at WikiProject Medicine are working on a collaborative effort with
 Translators Without Borders (TWB), a group which includes 2,000 or so
 volunteer translators. We are working to translate key medical articles
 into as many other languages as possible. Currently we have translated
 content into 50 or so languages amounting to 2.3 million words of text.

 The process involves first bringing articles to either GA or FA status in
 English. They are then delivered, with MediaWiki markup in place, to the
 TWB website where the text is sent out to the translators. Once translated
 we at Wikipedia are notified via orange links on this page here:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MED/Progress

 This issue currently is that we are missing Wikipedians in some languages
 to add / combine the translated content into the respective Wikipedia. Some
 of the article created through this process have reached feature article
 status including translations into Hungarian of anaphylaxis and
 hypertension. We currently have translated content in the following
 languages waiting to be integrated:

 Hindi

 Chinese

 Persian

 Tagalog

 Indonesian

 Macedonian

 Greek

 Bulgarian

 Danish

 Polish

 Swedish

 Arabic

 Ukrainian

 Dutch

 Czech

 Serbian

 Slovenian

 Spanish

 Telugu

 Tamil

 Punjabi

 Turkish

 Kurdish

 Thai

 Swahili

 Yoruba

 Kinyarwanda

 An overview of the efforts can be found here:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:TTF

 If you are interested in getting involved in adding translated articles
 instructions are here:


 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Translation_task_force/Adding_content

 If you have further question or comments I would welcome the feedback.

 James Heilman

 MD, CCFP(EM), Wikipedian

 WikiProject Medicine

 The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
 www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe