Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance
the problem is, Johnny's in an area where his local C.O. isn't tapped by the major LNP-able VOIP or Voice guys. No one, and I've looked and spoken to many, has 337-774 portable... JohnnyO wrote: Ok - #1 - This customer has had the same phone # at this location for 20+ years - They do over 17million per year in volume out of this location. It's a fuel dock. They rely heavily on inbound calls for generating this. #2 - The customer will not change their phone # - This is NOT an option #3 - This company does a total of 90+ million / year in revenue and as their internet provider - I will not chance losing their accounts. #4 - I think it's absolutely stupid and a waste of time for them to have to dial 337-774- to be able to call the same number by dialing 774-. I know that this can be worked around with the dialing features. I have no issues with an asterisk solution - I have the equipment on-hand and am currently working with Butch Evans to get this setup. At this point in time - The only thing I can do is to bring in POTS lines to make this work so we can terminate their phone #s at our office. I am looking for an out of the box appliance that will do this as well. I have other clients wanting to come onboard for the hosted PBX aspects and VoIP advantages also. JohnnyO On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 00:07 -0600, Joe Laura wrote: Johnny, Im a little confused as to why you do not think this is doable. Send me the specific needs for the client and I think we can make this happen. You do have wireless to all of these clients right? BTW, What do you have against an Asterisk solution? Superior Wireless New Orleans,La. www.superior1.com http://www.superior1.com - Original Message - *From:* JohnnyO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* Mac Dearman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Cc:* WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org *Sent:* Saturday, March 04, 2006 11:45 PM *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance Mac - as I stated - None of these #s are local. Which means their office 7 miles away would have to dial long distance to get their location in the same 337-774 - FYI - we still have 7 digit dialing in our area. This is not just a matter of setting up VoIP - this customer has specific needs and I have to fill them. We're rolling out a beta for them at one of their small locations and if all goes well - I will be able to capture all of their locations - They employ 100+ people and currently have a total of 64 lines combined across all of their locations. JohnnyO On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 19:20 -0600, Mac Dearman wrote: The Hell you say I can't! Pick your towns and get the check book out - $50.00 per number and start talking!!! This includes unlimited long distance as well as local calls - - -with all the whistles and bells - bar none! 337 Crowley LA 337 De Ridder LA 337 Lafayette LA 337 Lawtell LA 337 Leesville LA 337 Lake Charles LA 337 New Iberia LA 337 Opelousas LA 337 St Martinville LA 337 Sulphur LA 337 Vinton LA 337 Youngsville LA Mac Dearman Maximum Access, LLC. Authorized Barracuda Reseller MikroTik RouterOS Certified www.inetsouth.com http://www.inetsouth.com www.mac-tel.us http://www.mac-tel.us www.RadioResponse.org http://www.RadioResponse.org (Katrina Relief) Rayville, La. 318.728.8600 318.303.4228 318.303.4229 - Original Message - *From:* JohnnyO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* Mac Dearman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Cc:* WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org *Sent:* Friday, March 03, 2006 7:59 PM *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance Mac - you can't provide it either :) Please let me know if you can... 337-774 Let me know if you can provide local to me service - Also - will you sell me unlimited plans ? I'd be willing to pay $50.00/mo for unlimited useage. They only use about 9000-12000 LOCAL minutes per month JohnnyO On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 19:08 -0600, Mac Dearman wrote: Just send me a connection fee and I will take care of the rest of it :-) How many lines, whats the area code and how fast do you need them? With 911 of course. Mac Dearman Maximum Access, LLC. Authorized Barracuda Reseller MikroTik RouterOS Certified www.inetsouth.com http://www.inetsouth.com www.mac-tel.us http://www.mac-tel.us www.RadioResponse.org http://www.RadioResponse.org (Katrina Relief) Rayville, La. 318.728.8600 318.303.4228 318.303.4229 - Original Message - *From:* JohnnyO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* WISPA
Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance
The fact that you may not be able to port that particular number shouldnt be a problem. I would never take 100% of the POTS lines out of any business any way. Roll that important number into the * box as an inbound line only and have it roll over the calls to the VoIP lines. It would never do anything but have inbound phone calls coming across it and could serve as a backup in case their WISP decided to take a vacation during the busy season and the wireless goes down. :) J'O - if you have wireless to all his locations now - - you could knock out those lohg distance charges to day by carrying his traffic across your network. Of course there would be a little ole small fee for that eh? :) Holler if we can help Mac Dearman Maximum Access, LLC. Authorized Barracuda Reseller MikroTik RouterOS Certified www.inetsouth.com www.mac-tel.us www.RadioResponse.org (Katrina Relief) Rayville, La. 318.728.8600 318.303.4228 318.303.4229 - Original Message - From: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 6:11 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance the problem is, Johnny's in an area where his local C.O. isn't tapped by the major LNP-able VOIP or Voice guys. No one, and I've looked and spoken to many, has 337-774 portable... JohnnyO wrote: Ok - #1 - This customer has had the same phone # at this location for 20+ years - They do over 17million per year in volume out of this location. It's a fuel dock. They rely heavily on inbound calls for generating this. #2 - The customer will not change their phone # - This is NOT an option #3 - This company does a total of 90+ million / year in revenue and as their internet provider - I will not chance losing their accounts. #4 - I think it's absolutely stupid and a waste of time for them to have to dial 337-774- to be able to call the same number by dialing 774-. I know that this can be worked around with the dialing features. I have no issues with an asterisk solution - I have the equipment on-hand and am currently working with Butch Evans to get this setup. At this point in time - The only thing I can do is to bring in POTS lines to make this work so we can terminate their phone #s at our office. I am looking for an out of the box appliance that will do this as well. I have other clients wanting to come onboard for the hosted PBX aspects and VoIP advantages also. JohnnyO On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 00:07 -0600, Joe Laura wrote: Johnny, Im a little confused as to why you do not think this is doable. Send me the specific needs for the client and I think we can make this happen. You do have wireless to all of these clients right? BTW, What do you have against an Asterisk solution? Superior Wireless New Orleans,La. www.superior1.com http://www.superior1.com - Original Message - *From:* JohnnyO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* Mac Dearman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Cc:* WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org *Sent:* Saturday, March 04, 2006 11:45 PM *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance Mac - as I stated - None of these #s are local. Which means their office 7 miles away would have to dial long distance to get their location in the same 337-774 - FYI - we still have 7 digit dialing in our area. This is not just a matter of setting up VoIP - this customer has specific needs and I have to fill them. We're rolling out a beta for them at one of their small locations and if all goes well - I will be able to capture all of their locations - They employ 100+ people and currently have a total of 64 lines combined across all of their locations. JohnnyO On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 19:20 -0600, Mac Dearman wrote: The Hell you say I can't! Pick your towns and get the check book out - $50.00 per number and start talking!!! This includes unlimited long distance as well as local calls - - -with all the whistles and bells - bar none! 337 Crowley LA 337 De Ridder LA 337 Lafayette LA 337 Lawtell LA 337 Leesville LA 337 Lake Charles LA 337 New Iberia LA 337 Opelousas LA 337 St Martinville LA 337 Sulphur LA 337 Vinton LA 337 Youngsville LA Mac Dearman Maximum Access, LLC. Authorized Barracuda Reseller MikroTik RouterOS Certified www.inetsouth.com http://www.inetsouth.com www.mac-tel.us http://www.mac-tel.us www.RadioResponse.org http://www.RadioResponse.org (Katrina Relief) Rayville, La. 318.728.8600 318.303.4228 318.303.4229 - Original Message - *From:* JohnnyO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* Mac Dearman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Cc:* WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org *Sent:* Friday, March 03, 2006 7:59 PM *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance
[WISPA] ATT merging with BellSouth
NYT/WSJ ATT Inc. is nearing the acquisition of BellSouth Corp. for roughly $65 billion, people familiar with the situation said Saturday evening. A deal could be announced as early as Monday, these people said. Final terms of the deal could not be learned Saturday evening, but these people said ATT Inc. would pay a premium for BellSouth shares of at least 15%, valuing the company at $36 per share at least, up from its trading price Friday of $31.46. That would push the total equity value of the deal to at least $65 billion, plus the assumption of an additional $17 billion of BellSouth debt. Spokespeople for BellSouth and ATT declined to comment. An ATT-BellSouth deal would effectively cleave the nation's telecom services in two, each vertically integrated with a local phone operation, business services, and wireless unit. And it would effectively validate the vision of competition laid out by the government -- one in which traditional telecom firms compete directly against cable operators rather than against each other. The move would give ATT Inc. sole control over Cingular, the nation's largest wireless operator. A combination between ATT and BellSouth could have combined market capitalization of nearly $160 billion, making ATT far larger than rival Verizon. The deal would nonetheless set a showdown between ATT and Verizon, as the two fight to control wireless, the growth portion of the telecom business. It was the steep growth of Cingular -- joint owned by BellSouth and the former SBC -- that helped push the two firms together, say telecom bankers familiar with the space. As the importance of the wireless business grew, they say, it became inevitable that SBC (which adopted the ATT name just months ago) would consolidate its position in the South. Put together, the SBC territory would extend from California to Florida, north to Illinois and south to Texas. Combining the two companies' current market capitalizations, ATT would have a market value approaching $150 billion, over 50% greater than Verizon. ATT Chairman and Chief Executive Edward Whitacre has made a name for himself in the telecommunications industry as a serial acquirer. Mr. Whitacre is able to boast of a string of acquisitions including Pacific Telesis Corp., Ameritech Corp. and Southern New England Telecommunications Corp. But as he nears retirement the market had been anticipating one last hurrah from him; a BellSouth acquisition by ATT has long been the subject of speculation from analysts, investors and the two companies' rivals. Still the speedy move to acquire BellSouth came as a surprise so soon after Mr. Whitacre's takeover of ATT Corp. last fall. His company is just starting to digest the $16 billion acquisition. The former SBC Communications Inc. took over ATT Corp. and adopted the ATT moniker. The new company dominates nearly every aspect of the industry, from high-speed Internet connections to long-distance phone service, as well as wireless. And Mr. Whitacre now has access to the old ATT's enterprise business and world-wide network. Such a deal would likely prompt howls of protest in some quarters as it comes on the heels not only of the ATT-SBC deal but also after Verizon Communications Inc.'s acquisition of MCI. Those deals were approved with only a few minor conditions despite concerns they would lead to higher prices for business customers. The wave of mergers has dramatically reshaped the telecom industry, and a purchase of BellSouth would further cement the recreation of the old Ma Bell, which the government pushed to break up in 1984. The management of ATT, which has apparently briefed key senior government officials late last week, appears to be betting that the Bush administration and a Bell-friendly Federal Communications Commission won't raise too many obstacles for such a deal, arguing that the companies serve different geographic regions and do not currently compete with one another in a significant way. Although ATT and Verizon's last mergers passed both FCC and Justice Department review with little major problems, the latest proposed merger may face more hurdles. Recent comments by ATT and BellSouth executives about their intentions to explore new revenue streams from their high-speed Internet services by introducing two-tier or premium service for Internet content providers. Concerns about those plans and the concept of net neutrality, or ensuring that consumers have open access to all Internet sites and services and businesses do not find their content slowed, has become a major problems for the Bells in Washington. Meanwhile, the FCC that will be reviewing the ATT/BellSouth deal will likely be a much different body soon with the addition of Robert McDowell, a veteran telecom lawyer who currently serves as assistant general counsel at Comptel, which represents smaller telephone companies and was a vocal opponent of the ATT and Verizon mergers last year. Mr. McDowell is scheduled to appear before
Re: [WISPA] ATT merging with BellSouth
Google's market cap is $126 billion.. Still smaller than this new company, but close. Start a company with google's vision but for telcom and get a $150 billion market cap.. :-) On Mar 5, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Frank Muto wrote: NYT/WSJ ATT Inc. is nearing the acquisition of BellSouth Corp. for roughly $65 billion, people familiar with the situation said Saturday evening. A deal could be announced as early as Monday, these people said. Final terms of the deal could not be learned Saturday evening, but these people said ATT Inc. would pay a premium for BellSouth shares of at least 15%, valuing the company at $36 per share at least, up from its trading price Friday of $31.46. That would push the total equity value of the deal to at least $65 billion, plus the assumption of an additional $17 billion of BellSouth debt. Spokespeople for BellSouth and ATT declined to comment. An ATT-BellSouth deal would effectively cleave the nation's telecom services in two, each vertically integrated with a local phone operation, business services, and wireless unit. And it would effectively validate the vision of competition laid out by the government -- one in which traditional telecom firms compete directly against cable operators rather than against each other. The move would give ATT Inc. sole control over Cingular, the nation's largest wireless operator. A combination between ATT and BellSouth could have combined market capitalization of nearly $160 billion, making ATT far larger than rival Verizon. The deal would nonetheless set a showdown between ATT and Verizon, as the two fight to control wireless, the growth portion of the telecom business. It was the steep growth of Cingular -- joint owned by BellSouth and the former SBC -- that helped push the two firms together, say telecom bankers familiar with the space. As the importance of the wireless business grew, they say, it became inevitable that SBC (which adopted the ATT name just months ago) would consolidate its position in the South. Put together, the SBC territory would extend from California to Florida, north to Illinois and south to Texas. Combining the two companies' current market capitalizations, ATT would have a market value approaching $150 billion, over 50% greater than Verizon. ATT Chairman and Chief Executive Edward Whitacre has made a name for himself in the telecommunications industry as a serial acquirer. Mr. Whitacre is able to boast of a string of acquisitions including Pacific Telesis Corp., Ameritech Corp. and Southern New England Telecommunications Corp. But as he nears retirement the market had been anticipating one last hurrah from him; a BellSouth acquisition by ATT has long been the subject of speculation from analysts, investors and the two companies' rivals. Still the speedy move to acquire BellSouth came as a surprise so soon after Mr. Whitacre's takeover of ATT Corp. last fall. His company is just starting to digest the $16 billion acquisition. The former SBC Communications Inc. took over ATT Corp. and adopted the ATT moniker. The new company dominates nearly every aspect of the industry, from high-speed Internet connections to long-distance phone service, as well as wireless. And Mr. Whitacre now has access to the old ATT's enterprise business and world-wide network. Such a deal would likely prompt howls of protest in some quarters as it comes on the heels not only of the ATT-SBC deal but also after Verizon Communications Inc.'s acquisition of MCI. Those deals were approved with only a few minor conditions despite concerns they would lead to higher prices for business customers. The wave of mergers has dramatically reshaped the telecom industry, and a purchase of BellSouth would further cement the recreation of the old Ma Bell, which the government pushed to break up in 1984. The management of ATT, which has apparently briefed key senior government officials late last week, appears to be betting that the Bush administration and a Bell-friendly Federal Communications Commission won't raise too many obstacles for such a deal, arguing that the companies serve different geographic regions and do not currently compete with one another in a significant way. Although ATT and Verizon's last mergers passed both FCC and Justice Department review with little major problems, the latest proposed merger may face more hurdles. Recent comments by ATT and BellSouth executives about their intentions to explore new revenue streams from their high-speed Internet services by introducing two-tier or premium service for Internet content providers. Concerns about those plans and the concept of net neutrality, or ensuring that consumers have open access to all Internet sites and services and businesses do not find their content slowed, has become a major problems for the Bells in Washington. Meanwhile, the FCC that will be reviewing the
Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance
Mac, you're right, but the local-dialing problem is the one Johnny's trying to solve, with NO CALL FORWARDING involved, which would incur him extra charges... The problem is this company's customers in the local area dialing them 9 - 12000 minutes / month, and if they're dialing a 337-774 number now, there's NO WAY you can get local numbers to that on PRIs or BRIs or T-1s - only POTS in Johnny's facility, which then incurs huge charges. The ONE option I suggested to Johnny was getting an 800#, and call forwarding the local 337-774 numbers to that 800#, but then that company would pay for the toll-free minutes No easy away around it at the moment, I'm afraid... Mac Dearman wrote: The fact that you may not be able to port that particular number shouldnt be a problem. I would never take 100% of the POTS lines out of any business any way. Roll that important number into the * box as an inbound line only and have it roll over the calls to the VoIP lines. It would never do anything but have inbound phone calls coming across it and could serve as a backup in case their WISP decided to take a vacation during the busy season and the wireless goes down. :) J'O - if you have wireless to all his locations now - - you could knock out those lohg distance charges to day by carrying his traffic across your network. Of course there would be a little ole small fee for that eh? :) Holler if we can help Mac Dearman Maximum Access, LLC. Authorized Barracuda Reseller MikroTik RouterOS Certified www.inetsouth.com www.mac-tel.us www.RadioResponse.org (Katrina Relief) Rayville, La. 318.728.8600 318.303.4228 318.303.4229 - Original Message - From: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 6:11 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance the problem is, Johnny's in an area where his local C.O. isn't tapped by the major LNP-able VOIP or Voice guys. No one, and I've looked and spoken to many, has 337-774 portable... JohnnyO wrote: Ok - #1 - This customer has had the same phone # at this location for 20+ years - They do over 17million per year in volume out of this location. It's a fuel dock. They rely heavily on inbound calls for generating this. #2 - The customer will not change their phone # - This is NOT an option #3 - This company does a total of 90+ million / year in revenue and as their internet provider - I will not chance losing their accounts. #4 - I think it's absolutely stupid and a waste of time for them to have to dial 337-774- to be able to call the same number by dialing 774-. I know that this can be worked around with the dialing features. I have no issues with an asterisk solution - I have the equipment on-hand and am currently working with Butch Evans to get this setup. At this point in time - The only thing I can do is to bring in POTS lines to make this work so we can terminate their phone #s at our office. I am looking for an out of the box appliance that will do this as well. I have other clients wanting to come onboard for the hosted PBX aspects and VoIP advantages also. JohnnyO On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 00:07 -0600, Joe Laura wrote: Johnny, Im a little confused as to why you do not think this is doable. Send me the specific needs for the client and I think we can make this happen. You do have wireless to all of these clients right? BTW, What do you have against an Asterisk solution? Superior Wireless New Orleans,La. www.superior1.com http://www.superior1.com - Original Message - *From:* JohnnyO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* Mac Dearman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Cc:* WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org *Sent:* Saturday, March 04, 2006 11:45 PM *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance Mac - as I stated - None of these #s are local. Which means their office 7 miles away would have to dial long distance to get their location in the same 337-774 - FYI - we still have 7 digit dialing in our area. This is not just a matter of setting up VoIP - this customer has specific needs and I have to fill them. We're rolling out a beta for them at one of their small locations and if all goes well - I will be able to capture all of their locations - They employ 100+ people and currently have a total of 64 lines combined across all of their locations. JohnnyO On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 19:20 -0600, Mac Dearman wrote: The Hell you say I can't! Pick your towns and get the check book out - $50.00 per number and start talking!!! This includes unlimited long distance as well as local calls - - -with all the whistles and bells - bar none! 337 Crowley LA 337 De Ridder LA 337 Lafayette LA 337 Lawtell LA 337 Leesville LA 337 Lake Charles LA 337 New Iberia LA 337 Opelousas LA 337 St Martinville LA
Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance
The * box would provide the all the roll over services needed for actual POTS line that has no options via the local ILEC/CLEC. Then the other true VoIP lines in the * box could/would service all the outgoing calls. Example: Current VIP POTS line rings - the * box shuffles that call to a VoIP line also in the * box that is then answered and leaves the VIP POTS line open for other incoming calls. Its really not complicated, but is involved to get it all set up. All outgoing calls could be sent via the VoIP so that the VIP POTS line is never tied up. I tell ya again - if you need some help - call me Mac Dearman Maximum Access, LLC. Authorized Barracuda Reseller MikroTik RouterOS Certified www.inetsouth.com www.mac-tel.us www.RadioResponse.org (Katrina Relief) Rayville, La. 318.728.8600 318.303.4228 318.303.4229 - Original Message - From: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 12:35 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance Mac, you're right, but the local-dialing problem is the one Johnny's trying to solve, with NO CALL FORWARDING involved, which would incur him extra charges... The problem is this company's customers in the local area dialing them 9 - 12000 minutes / month, and if they're dialing a 337-774 number now, there's NO WAY you can get local numbers to that on PRIs or BRIs or T-1s - only POTS in Johnny's facility, which then incurs huge charges. The ONE option I suggested to Johnny was getting an 800#, and call forwarding the local 337-774 numbers to that 800#, but then that company would pay for the toll-free minutes No easy away around it at the moment, I'm afraid... Mac Dearman wrote: The fact that you may not be able to port that particular number shouldnt be a problem. I would never take 100% of the POTS lines out of any business any way. Roll that important number into the * box as an inbound line only and have it roll over the calls to the VoIP lines. It would never do anything but have inbound phone calls coming across it and could serve as a backup in case their WISP decided to take a vacation during the busy season and the wireless goes down. :) J'O - if you have wireless to all his locations now - - you could knock out those lohg distance charges to day by carrying his traffic across your network. Of course there would be a little ole small fee for that eh? :) Holler if we can help Mac Dearman Maximum Access, LLC. Authorized Barracuda Reseller MikroTik RouterOS Certified www.inetsouth.com www.mac-tel.us www.RadioResponse.org (Katrina Relief) Rayville, La. 318.728.8600 318.303.4228 318.303.4229 - Original Message - From: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 6:11 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance the problem is, Johnny's in an area where his local C.O. isn't tapped by the major LNP-able VOIP or Voice guys. No one, and I've looked and spoken to many, has 337-774 portable... JohnnyO wrote: Ok - #1 - This customer has had the same phone # at this location for 20+ years - They do over 17million per year in volume out of this location. It's a fuel dock. They rely heavily on inbound calls for generating this. #2 - The customer will not change their phone # - This is NOT an option #3 - This company does a total of 90+ million / year in revenue and as their internet provider - I will not chance losing their accounts. #4 - I think it's absolutely stupid and a waste of time for them to have to dial 337-774- to be able to call the same number by dialing 774-. I know that this can be worked around with the dialing features. I have no issues with an asterisk solution - I have the equipment on-hand and am currently working with Butch Evans to get this setup. At this point in time - The only thing I can do is to bring in POTS lines to make this work so we can terminate their phone #s at our office. I am looking for an out of the box appliance that will do this as well. I have other clients wanting to come onboard for the hosted PBX aspects and VoIP advantages also. JohnnyO On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 00:07 -0600, Joe Laura wrote: Johnny, Im a little confused as to why you do not think this is doable. Send me the specific needs for the client and I think we can make this happen. You do have wireless to all of these clients right? BTW, What do you have against an Asterisk solution? Superior Wireless New Orleans,La. www.superior1.com http://www.superior1.com - Original Message - *From:* JohnnyO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* Mac Dearman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Cc:* WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org *Sent:* Saturday, March 04, 2006 11:45 PM *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] VoIP/PBX Gateway appliance Mac - as I stated - None of these #s are local. Which means their office 7
wireless@wispa.org
Consumers seeking a real alternative to cable monopolies should ... This has to be the funniest thing I have EVER read. The newest (still growing) behemouth is calling someone ELSE a monopoly? Give me a break! -- Butch Evans Network Engineering and Security Consulting http://www.butchevans.com/ Mikrotik Certified Consultant (http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html) -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] How is this for a wireless discription?
H - personally I don't like it but the end users may love it. Looks like someone spent a great deal of time on this and I commend them for that. Unfortunately - here the people would look at that picture and get confused and baffled and then we'd end up with double the questions during our explanation ! JohnnyO On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 17:35 -0600, Victoria wrote: http://www.stlbroadband.com/How_It_Works.htm Victoria Proffer www.StLouisBroadBand.com 314-974-5600 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
