[WISPA] ATT petitions the FCC

2006-03-22 Thread Dawn

All,

I am sure everyone here saw this coming. If anyone thought because they 
were not in Verizon territory they were not

affected there is bad news on the way.

As quoted from the article;

   I think it will be pretty close to what Verizon did, 
Whitacre said, referring to his plans to file a petition similar
 to the one by Verizon that sought deregulation. I'm sure 
if Verizon has it, we'll get it too.


and as quoted on page 2;

One analyst said that ATT and other incumbent telephone 
carriers could be at a disadvantage when competing
against Verizon for business customers if the FCC delayed 
acting on requests for similar regulatory relief.



Full story linked below;

http://tinyurl.com/h5er5

Regards,
Dawn
---
---

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Article: Bell South Offers WiMAX backup

2006-03-22 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181

roflol

Man I'm good!  I'm working with Alex at isp-planet right now on an article 
about that very thing!  It was submitted about 2 weeks ago.


grin
Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: wireless@WISPA.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 3:06 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Article: Bell South Offers WiMAX backup


Bell South said to be offering WiMAX backup for $30 per month in Las 
Vegas.



http://www.rcrnews.com/news.cms?newsId=25911


Two things would be very cool:

1. If journalists would learn to properly differentiate pre-WiMAX from 
WiMAX.


2. If more WISPs would offer wireless backup services to businesses.


--
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the License-Free Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
True Vendor-Neutral WISP Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting
Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220  www.ask-wi.com




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Muni wireless

2006-03-22 Thread John Scrivner
Munis are just your hometown wanting service just like residents, 
business and education. As soon as we learn this we will all benefit 
from it greatly. Public safety specifically is the killer application of 
muni broadband in my opinion. If we all learn how to sell this to our 
towns and service it correctly we will inevitably win in the end. 
Backhaul to munis who decide to go it alone is also an option. I would 
bet most if not all of them would pay for a service agreement on their 
networks also. Maybe they will pay you to build their network for them?

Scriv


Matt Liotta wrote:

I personally don't much care for Muni wireless as I would rather the 
government stay out of the ISP business. With that being said, Rome, 
GA announced that GTS had won the the contract to install a wireless 
system for the city. See http://muniwireless.com/municipal/bids/1102/ 
for details on the announcement.


What I thought the list might find interesting is that we 
(AirInfinite, now One Ring Networks) were included in GTS's bid and 
will now be providing backhaul for the wireless network. I believe 
this is an interesting approach for WISPs to take when dealing with 
munis that have an interest in wireless.


-Matt


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Muni wireless

2006-03-22 Thread Peter R.

http://localtechwire.com/article.cfm?u=13558
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Stupid Trango question ?

2006-03-22 Thread Mike Inverso
Hello All:

I have renamed this post as 'Stupid Trango Question rather than Stupid
Trango.  I'm sure you can guess why.  And, there are no stupid
questions.

Victoria, if you are referring to the M5800S-SU-EXT or the
M5830S-SU-EXT, neither can be used as a stand alone unit.  There is not
an internal antenna in either unit, so you must use some type of
external antenna.  

Best regards,
Michael Inverso
Sales Manager, US South Region
Trango Broadband Wireless
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Stupid Trango ?

That really depends on which one you have.  The old one's, no, the new
ones, yes.

Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message -
From: Victoria [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:52 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Stupid Trango ?


 Can an EXT be used as a cpe only, without the dish?

 Victoria Proffer
 www.StLouisBroadBand.com
 314-974-5600

 -- 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Stupid Trango question ?

2006-03-22 Thread G.Villarini
Mike,

I'll assume you wouldn't mind a thread like stupid Motorola? jeje

Gino A. Villarini, 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.273.4143


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Inverso
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 12:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Stupid Trango question ?

Hello All:

I have renamed this post as 'Stupid Trango Question rather than Stupid
Trango.  I'm sure you can guess why.  And, there are no stupid
questions.

Victoria, if you are referring to the M5800S-SU-EXT or the
M5830S-SU-EXT, neither can be used as a stand alone unit.  There is not
an internal antenna in either unit, so you must use some type of
external antenna.  

Best regards,
Michael Inverso
Sales Manager, US South Region
Trango Broadband Wireless
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Stupid Trango ?

That really depends on which one you have.  The old one's, no, the new
ones, yes.

Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message -
From: Victoria [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:52 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Stupid Trango ?


 Can an EXT be used as a cpe only, without the dish?

 Victoria Proffer
 www.StLouisBroadBand.com
 314-974-5600

 -- 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Muni wireless

2006-03-22 Thread John Tully

Hello John,

MikroTik is currently developing the biggest feature of mesh -- easy to 
install systems (no configuration required) that have a radio (or more) for 
local and a radio (or more) for backbone.  This will enable WISP to compete 
better with the expensive Strix and other MESH systems.  You will hear more 
about this at the MikroTik user meeting in Dallas - mum.mikrotik.com .


John
www.mikrotik.com

At 06:16 PM 3/22/2006, you wrote:
Munis are just your hometown wanting service just like residents, business 
and education. As soon as we learn this we will all benefit from it 
greatly. Public safety specifically is the killer application of muni 
broadband in my opinion. If we all learn how to sell this to our towns and 
service it correctly we will inevitably win in the end. Backhaul to munis 
who decide to go it alone is also an option. I would bet most if not all 
of them would pay for a service agreement on their networks also. Maybe 
they will pay you to build their network for them?

Scriv


Matt Liotta wrote:

I personally don't much care for Muni wireless as I would rather the 
government stay out of the ISP business. With that being said, Rome, GA 
announced that GTS had won the the contract to install a wireless system 
for the city. See http://muniwireless.com/municipal/bids/1102/ for 
details on the announcement.


What I thought the list might find interesting is that we (AirInfinite, 
now One Ring Networks) were included in GTS's bid and will now be 
providing backhaul for the wireless network. I believe this is an 
interesting approach for WISPs to take when dealing with munis that have 
an interest in wireless.


-Matt


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Needing Service North of Hammond

2006-03-22 Thread JohnnyO
Title: Needing Service North of Hammond






Name = Tareah Mizell

Company = Webmedx

Email = [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Address = 21074 Firetower Road

Address2 =

City, State Zip = Loranger, LA 70446

Home Phone = 985-878-6643

Mobile Phone = 985-974-3135

Fax =

URL =

Interested In = Residential Connection




If someone can service this person - Please contact this person 



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Muni wireless

2006-03-22 Thread Tom DeReggi

Congradulations Matt.
What you demonstrated is exactly the message that WISPs need to send to 
their community and Munis. That there is benefit to partner with your local 
WISP that already has coverage and backbones, instead of duplicating, 
competing and interfering with them.  No Provider will want to interfere 
with their own backbone provider, which incourages a long term cooperative 
relationship with the existing WISP partner for mutual benefit.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:47 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Muni wireless


I personally don't much care for Muni wireless as I would rather the 
government stay out of the ISP business. With that being said, Rome, GA 
announced that GTS had won the the contract to install a wireless system 
for the city. See http://muniwireless.com/municipal/bids/1102/ for details 
on the announcement.


What I thought the list might find interesting is that we (AirInfinite, 
now One Ring Networks) were included in GTS's bid and will now be 
providing backhaul for the wireless network. I believe this is an 
interesting approach for WISPs to take when dealing with munis that have 
an interest in wireless.


-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Muni wireless

2006-03-22 Thread Matt Liotta
The real test for us will come when Atlanta releases its RFP, which is 
widely expected to be won by Earthlink.


-Matt

Tom DeReggi wrote:


Congradulations Matt.
What you demonstrated is exactly the message that WISPs need to send 
to their community and Munis. That there is benefit to partner with 
your local WISP that already has coverage and backbones, instead of 
duplicating, competing and interfering with them.  No Provider will 
want to interfere with their own backbone provider, which incourages a 
long term cooperative relationship with the existing WISP partner for 
mutual benefit.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:47 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Muni wireless


I personally don't much care for Muni wireless as I would rather the 
government stay out of the ISP business. With that being said, Rome, 
GA announced that GTS had won the the contract to install a wireless 
system for the city. See http://muniwireless.com/municipal/bids/1102/ 
for details on the announcement.


What I thought the list might find interesting is that we 
(AirInfinite, now One Ring Networks) were included in GTS's bid and 
will now be providing backhaul for the wireless network. I believe 
this is an interesting approach for WISPs to take when dealing with 
munis that have an interest in wireless.


-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Muni wireless

2006-03-22 Thread Joe Laura
I tried to work with the City here but they wanted to do it all themselves.
Well, Im thinking by the progress they have made so far they might have
something worthwhile in the next few years, maybe. It reminds me of when I
first started my wireless business many years ago.
Superior Wireless
New Orleans,La.
www.superior1.com
- Original Message -
From: John J. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Muni wireless


You are absolutely right John. I can't list all the cities we are doing
Public Safety projects for right now, but we are starting to light up the
city of Gilroy CA. A lot of dollars are being spent on projects in the name
of Public Safety, especially to allow Emergency Services to be able to
remotely access network resources. The next thing on the radar is providing
Internet access. If the WISP gets there early, he can be a part of the
solution. If the WISP isn't there, the city will go ahead and do it anyway.

John Thomas


-Original Message-
From: John Scrivner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 08:16 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Muni wireless

Munis are just your hometown wanting service just like residents,
business and education. As soon as we learn this we will all benefit
from it greatly. Public safety specifically is the killer application of
muni broadband in my opinion. If we all learn how to sell this to our
towns and service it correctly we will inevitably win in the end.
Backhaul to munis who decide to go it alone is also an option. I would
bet most if not all of them would pay for a service agreement on their
networks also. Maybe they will pay you to build their network for them?
Scriv


Matt Liotta wrote:

 I personally don't much care for Muni wireless as I would rather the
 government stay out of the ISP business. With that being said, Rome,
 GA announced that GTS had won the the contract to install a wireless
 system for the city. See http://muniwireless.com/municipal/bids/1102/
 for details on the announcement.

 What I thought the list might find interesting is that we
 (AirInfinite, now One Ring Networks) were included in GTS's bid and
 will now be providing backhaul for the wireless network. I believe
 this is an interesting approach for WISPs to take when dealing with
 munis that have an interest in wireless.

 -Matt

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/