RE: [WISPA] news

2007-03-10 Thread Brad Larson
Dang Dee that's cool! Get Ed Wyatt fishing will ya? Brad

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of W.D.McKinney
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 2:39 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] news

Not far enough north Patrick :-) Try Kenai, Alaska around July 19th. We
can sit in lounge chairs overlooking the Kenai River, eat fresh Red
Salmon, and relax.

-Dee

Alaska Wireless Systems
1(907)240-2183 Cell
1(907)349-2226 Fax
1(907)349-4308 Office
www.akwireless.net


- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:51:37 -0900
Subject:
RE: [WISPA] news


 Btw, what's the best time of year in Odessa? I think I should go up
 there to escape and cave it with you for a weekend.
 
 Patrick 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
 Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 10:50 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] news
 
 Point well taken.
 
 Marlon --- slinks back into the wireless underground where he's more
up
 to 
 speed.
 
 
 (509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
 (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
 42846865 (icq)And I run my own
wisp!
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
 www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 10:44 AM
 Subject: RE: [WISPA] news
 
 
 Friend, you live in your real world, which may or may not resemble
 everyone else's experiences, including WISPs. But regardless, you are
 making and publicizing financial judgments about other companies that
 are simply incorrect. Whether or not a public company makes or loses
 money is not an opinion, it is something that 30 seconds of
 researchon Google (thanks to those efficiencies) can reveal.
 
 You are a person to whom others listen to; you thus have a
 responsibility for being as factual (about simple facts) as possible.
 When you are not, it calls into question the validity of other
 statements about facts you might make, i.e. it becomes fair to wonder
if
 you careless with the facts.
 
 As for opinions, you are 100% entitled to have and offer any.
 
 This is not a slam, just unsolicited advice from a peer who respects
you
 and its protective of how you may be perceived (remember, everyday
 brings new readers).
 
 And yes, I know full well, that I often set myself as a lightning rod
on
 lists, but I believe my facts are seldom in question (and I always
 welcome factual corrections).
 
 Patrick
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
 Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 10:22 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] news
 
 LOL
 
 Naw, I live in the real world.
 
 I try too hard to keep things simple sometimes though.  My wife works
 for an
 accountant and when she puts a check to us in the books as an expense
my
 
 eyes glaze over.
 
 Or when the bank tells me I'm not making any money cause there wasn't
 enough
 left over for the tax man to take at the end of the year.  When ALL of
 the
 bills get paid, mostly on time, and when I have food on the table and
 new
 towers coming online I think things are going just fine!
 
 grin
 Marlon
 (509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
 (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
 42846865 (icq)And I run my own
wisp!
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
 www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 10:09 AM
 Subject: RE: [WISPA] news
 
 
 ..as for Vonage, it's investors have been fleeing in droves ever since
 the IPO, driving down the per share price from the high of about $17
to
 about $4.20 so far today (on the heels of the patent suit loss to
 Verizon). Yes, every share sold is also a share bought, but the
 company's violent share deterioration tells you clearly what the
market,
 i.e. investors, think of the company as an investment.
 
 Marlon, I think you live in Oppositeville and not Odessa!
 
 Patrick Leary
 AVP WISP Markets
 Alvarion, Inc.
 o: 650.314.2628
 c: 760.580.0080
 Vonage: 650.641.1243
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
 Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:39 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] news
 
 Too bad some many customers say that the service sucks.
 
 I have a customer that moved.  Loved our wireless so much she went
with
 another wireless provider in the new local.  Clearwire.
 
 

[WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

2007-03-10 Thread JohnnyO
Can Anyone service this location 
 
Link to a google map -   Location
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=enq=41+39+13+-79+28+53layer=ie=UT
F8z=9ll=41.752873,-79.035645spn=0.850327,2.768555om=1  to be
serviced 
 
How about Saxton PA 
 
Regards,
 
JohnnyO
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Justice Department Takes Aim at Image-Sharing Sites

2007-03-10 Thread Peter R.
If you ALL joined one organization you would have a well-funded group to 
fight this.


But most ISP's, WISP's, Hosts, and VoIP Providers don't pay for 
membership any where.
Great at bitching. Champion, PhD bitching, but actually put up time and 
money to make one single org work, not so much.


This industry - if you can even call it that - has a myriad of 
organizations mainly due to strong independent feelings. So instead of 
one really strong group representing, you have a scattering of smaller, 
less powerful associations. AASP, FISPA, Part-15, WISPA, TISPA, et al.


CLEC's used to have that problem with ALTS, ASCENT and a couple of 
others. Now they have just enough members for one - one really weak one.


- Peter


wispa wrote:

Excellent analogy.  

The difference being that there's WalMart and Kmart and hundreds of other 
well funded retailers with lawyers who'll tell them to stuff it. 

The little guys get nailed instead, because we haven't got a raft of lawyers 
waiting around on retainer for something to do.  





Mark Koskenmaki   Neofast, Inc
Broadband for the Walla Walla Valley and Blue Mountains
541-969-8200

 




--


Regards,

Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect  Communicate
813.963.5884 
http://www.marketingIDEAguy.com



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] CALEA

2007-03-10 Thread Peter R.

I attended the Voice Peering Forum in Miami Beach Thursday and Friday.
Acme Packet and SS8 gave presentations on Lawful Intercept.
I will gladly email the 2 PDF's to you, if you send me your company 
name, address and phone.


Regards,

Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - the NSP Strategist
(813) 963-5884
www.4isps.com
www.rad-info.net
www.marketingideaguy.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...

2007-03-10 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
I found this thread interesting.

Enjoy,
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 5:51 PM
Subject: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...


So a gent on the P15 Moto list asked a huge number of questions about Canopy. I 
thought it would be very interesting to attempt to answer them from a VL 
perspective. Since it took a ton of time, I wanted to get some use out them. 
Excellent questions actually. Pretty darned thorough.

 

Patrick Leary 
AVP WISP Markets 
Alvarion, Inc. 
o: 650.314.2628 
c: 760.580.0080 
Vonage: 650.641.1243 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  Are modifications to the APs FCC legal?

  No, but we numerous 3rd party sectors sectors certified that may e used. Our 
sectors range from 60, 90, and 120 degrees, plus omni choices (God forbid!)

  How wide are the 5.7 AP channels, is this adjustable?  What would a SA
  show the channel width to be?

  Yes, 10 or 20 MHz wide. You can also change on the fly and all CPE will 
adjust automatically.

  What is the real-world distance achieved in a LOS situation without
  reflector, with?

  The CPE with VL comes with an integrated antenna which enables on the VL to 
reach about 7 miles LOS at full capacity (32mbps net ftp), 16mbps at 5 miles, 
29mbps at 2 miles and 32mbps at 1 mile. The answer BTW to your Canopy question 
can be found on their doc CNPY-ADV-SUBMODFCT brochure produced in 2006. On that 
doc it says the range of the 5.7 w/o reflector is 14mbps to 1 mile and 7mbps to 
2 miles. Beyond that you must have a reflector. With the reflect you get 14mbps 
to 5 miles and 7mbps to 10 miles.

  Are there any tools or utilities that Motorola or other offers to assist
  in the network development of Canopy products?

  There are things like link calculators, channel plan docs, and plenty of 
opportunity for direct consultation.

  Can two SMs on the same AP talk to each other without special routing?

  In VL it could be enabled via the many VLAN capabilities, which include QinQ 
VLAN support, but VL intentionally does not allow this out of the box (it is 
something the operator, i.e. you, should have control over.)

  Explain how the Advantage 14MB/s (or 20MB/s) works, how is that
  allocated, how true are those figures?  Is the allocation dynamic?  Can
  you mix breeds of SM on the AP?

  VL uses OFDM, which gives it some NLOS abilities (not so much with trees, but 
it also helps a bit there). The OFDM we uses adaptive modulates (dynamic) to 
maintain the best connection. Each mod level down is a lower rate. You can also 
set the radio to fix on a modulation level if you wish. All VL CPE versions 
work seamlessly together in any sector.

  Can an SM access the AP it's on for management?

  In VL the operator can assign multiple stations for management access.

  Is there a feature to disable broadcast traffic?

  Yes, VL has a broadcast rate limiting feature which can be set per 
subscriber. It can also send you a trap if any set station nears its limit.

  Why can't the APs use horizontal polarization?  Doesn't this limit the
  radio's ability to co-locate?

  The CPEs now have an option (in the rev E version hardware) to be either H or 
V pol mounted. The AUs can be mounted either way (by way of antenna choice).

  Why is the latency so high for the APs (5-7ms)?

  N/A, but looking in terms of a specific application, the delay with the 
optional WLP (wireless link prioritization feature) feature is stable at 4 or 
less ms.

   

  What is the maximum PPS per AP?

  Up to about 6 downstream and 48000 upstream.

  Are there any tools to prevent or reduce the impact from an end-user
  launching a DoS attack?

  Yes, the broadcast rate limiting feature was designed specifically because of 
this threat.

  How do the APs handle VoIP traffic?  Is there anything that can assist
  this?

  Better, literally, than any other AP in unlicensed, with up 288 CONCURRENT 
VoIP calls per AP (we call them AUs) with a MOS of better than 4.0. With the 
WLP feature implemented, MOS is typically over 4.1 and many tests show over 
4.4. (I have some great VoIP graphs). We can also run tons of concurrent data. 
The graphs show this too. 

  What is a realistic number of concurrent VoIP sessions an AP can handle?

  VL is the only product that can literally and dynamically prioritize VoIP 
over the entire pipe and across the entire sector (versus just dedicating a 
partition that must be allocated whether used or not). At the same time, VL has 
a starvation prevention mechanism to prevent starvation of low priority traffic.

  Are there any known problems with over-polling an AP with SNMP?

  We do not use polling. In our view it is less efficient than our 
implementation.

  Are the SMs SNMP capable, or only the data from a SM through the AP?

  Yes, if set to be one of the management consoles.

  What improvements over the current APs does Motorola hope to achieve in
  the next generation?

  VL was 

[WISPA] ssi calea deadline Monday!!!

2007-03-10 Thread Marlon K. Schafer

Hi All,

Kris send me a note that said only 17 people had requested that he file the 
ssi for them  There were over 50 that sent in the 445 via Kris.


Guys, Kris has written a nice manual for us (that's what the ssi is).  Use 
it or don't, but don't forget to file!


I've cc'd Kris.  If you have more questions I'm sure he'd just love to 
answer them :-).


laters,
marlon

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] License Wireless Link. Microwave Networks

2007-03-10 Thread Bob Moldashel

Rumor has it they are up for sale...   FYI





Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:

I've known them for a long time.  Not one of the big guys but never 
heard anything at all bad about them either.


Really good folks.

Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - From: Javier Arigita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 4:22 AM
Subject: [WISPA] License Wireless Link. Microwave Networks


I am looking for a high capacity link in license bands. I am having a 
look

at Microwave Networks (/www.microwavenetworks.com). Do you have any
experience with this manufacturer?

I am not really an expert in license links. I know Ceragon, 
Dragonwave and
Microwave. Does anyone have an idea of the ranking of vendors for 
license

wireless links?

Many Thanks and Best Regards,

Javier Arigita
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Fw: [TowerTalk] ferrite beads was...Re: [RFI] HIGH POWER and RFI...

2007-03-10 Thread Marlon K. Schafer

Hi guys,

Thought you might be interested in this link.
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Chuck Sudds [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] ferrite beads was...Re: [RFI] HIGH POWER and RFI...


At 08:27 AM 3/10/2007 -0800, Marlon wrote:

Marlon

Check here:http://www.audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf

Page 13 lists a bunch.  Good luck!  I know that I'll need it myself
;)  (Thanks, Jim!)

Chuck  KØTVD



Where do I find those freqs?  I've looked on google but haven't found any
good data that I can understand.
thanks
marlon



___



___
TowerTalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] License Wireless Link. Microwave Networks

2007-03-10 Thread Marlon K. Schafer

Hey there Bob!

How the heck have you been?  I called a couple of times to say hello but 
never made it past your voice jail.  I was starting to wonder if you'd 
fallen off a ladder or something!


laters,
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Bob Moldashel [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] License Wireless Link. Microwave Networks



Rumor has it they are up for sale...   FYI





Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:

I've known them for a long time.  Not one of the big guys but never heard 
anything at all bad about them either.


Really good folks.

Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - From: Javier Arigita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 4:22 AM
Subject: [WISPA] License Wireless Link. Microwave Networks


I am looking for a high capacity link in license bands. I am having a 
look

at Microwave Networks (/www.microwavenetworks.com). Do you have any
experience with this manufacturer?

I am not really an expert in license links. I know Ceragon, Dragonwave 
and
Microwave. Does anyone have an idea of the ranking of vendors for 
license

wireless links?

Many Thanks and Best Regards,

Javier Arigita
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] License Wireless Link. Microwave Networks

2007-03-10 Thread Bob Moldashel

Marlon K. Schafer wrote:


Hey there Bob!

How the heck have you been?  I called a couple of times to say hello 
but never made it past your voice jail.  I was starting to wonder if 
you'd fallen off a ladder or something!


laters,
marlon 


Not me.  Sorry for not getting back to you but you never left a number 
when you left a message and I lost your number when I changed 
Blackberry's.  I yes I am too lazy/busy to look it up on the web.


Been just real busy.  Don't have time for anything...  Hope all is well 
with everyone here.


BTW:  I would have thought you would have retired by now Marlon!   :-)

-B-
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...

2007-03-10 Thread Butch Evans

On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:


Are there any known problems with over-polling an AP with SNMP?
We do not use polling. In our view it is less efficient than our 
implementation.


Are the SMs SNMP capable, or only the data from a SM through the 
AP?

Yes, if set to be one of the management consoles.


These 2 questions and answers don't match.  ;-)  Patrick's answers 
are not related to the question.  I'd be interested to know the 
answer to the second question (for VL).


Where are the SMs authentication information (MAC, etc.) stored 
at?  AP level?  If an AP fails, what is involved with replacing 
that AP and restoring the SMs?  Are there any backup utilities to 
assist?


MAC table. If an AU fails and the best AU setting is enabled the 
CPEs will automatically re-associate to the next best AU.  All CPE 
and AUs have a shadow flash and different firmware can be stored on 
each flash, this is invaluable if for some reason an upgrade fails 
in process. We are the only ones with shadow flash (that I know 
of). AUs can also be deployed stand alone or as part of a chassis 
system with blades. In the chassis configuration supports redundant 
power and you can swap IDUs should an IDU fail.


Again here...the question was related to subscriber (cpe) 
authentication.  What authentication methods exist for VL?  Do they 
use a local database?  Does VL support RADIUS auth for the CPE?


Do the SM and AP have a log that we can see information about 
interfaces and traffic?


There's a question I do not know the answer to, but I can find out. 
Obviously not like a packet shaper though.


The question was about historical traffic information (not shaping). 
I'm not certain the question really makes much sense, but it sounds 
like he is asking about something similar to a graph of interface 
traffic and other stats (dropped packets, retrans, etc.).


Whew, that took a while. But it was a good exercise for me anyway. 
I'm happy to say I could answer most without looking at the manual. 
Not bad for a non-tech.


No kidding!  It was a good read (thanks, Marlon for posting).  There 
are a couple of questions that I had, as a follow up to the original 
question/answer post.


--
Butch Evans
Network Engineering and Security Consulting
573-276-2879
http://www.butchevans.com/
My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6
Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] How many WISPs ?

2007-03-10 Thread Rick Smith
1) How many are there total - anyone know ?

2) How many are registered here and listening

3) How many are members of WISPA ?

4) How do we start calling other WISPS and get them to join WISPA ?


3,000 x $270 / year = lobbying $$$.
100 x 270 / year = joke.

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...

2007-03-10 Thread Doug Ratcliffe
I'm sold.  Anyone wanna buy me some?  COMNET has nice pricing on CPE's, but
are there any discounts on the AU's?  There's so many parts it seems between
the blade chassis and that, I don't even know what parts that I'd need to
order.

Also, I was concerned with the blade chassis that 200' of LMR400 would be
too lossy to be useful - or does this have some kind of low frequency IF
signalling that's used on the cable itself?  Some equipment I've noticed
uses a much lower frequency up the tower that even LMR175 could be used.

Can I use this on an non-live, unipole, AM radio tower?

Thanks

- Original Message - 
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 12:01 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...


I found this thread interesting.

Enjoy,
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 5:51 PM
Subject: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...

[...]

  How do the APs handle VoIP traffic?  Is there anything that can assist
  this?

  Better, literally, than any other AP in unlicensed, with up 288 CONCURRENT
VoIP calls per AP (we call them AUs) with a MOS of better than 4.0. With the
WLP feature implemented, MOS is typically over 4.1 and many tests show over
4.4. (I have some great VoIP graphs). We can also run tons of concurrent
data. The graphs show this too.

  What is a realistic number of concurrent VoIP sessions an AP can handle?

  VL is the only product that can literally and dynamically prioritize VoIP
over the entire pipe and across the entire sector (versus just dedicating a
partition that must be allocated whether used or not). At the same time, VL
has a starvation prevention mechanism to prevent starvation of low priority
traffic.


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...

2007-03-10 Thread Rich Comroe
Impressive list of QA.  Not an issue, but I think the Questioner was asking 
about a different topic than the answerer was thinking of on one question.

I added the Q  A to make it clear:
Q  Are there any known problems with over-polling an AP with SNMP?
A  We do not use polling. In our view it is less efficient than our 
implementation.

I believe the questioner was thinking about a recent thread regarding Canopy 
where a couple wisps surprising observations were being discussed relative to 
the product's recent major OS replacement release by Motorola (Release 8).  In 
the thread someone observed that his network traffic appeared to slow down 
when his network management application began polling radios by SNMP.  
Continuous ping window times climbed in curious coincidence with network 
manager performance polling.  That's why from the langugage (and mention of 
SNMP) I don't think he was referring to polling as a means of bandwidth 
allocation between APs  SMs.  Changing OS (and consequently stacks) is a 
significant change.  There was a previous list of Canopy problems attributable 
to the OS communications stacks that could not be addressed because the license 
for the stacks did not provide source to the Canopy developers.  Ultimately a 
change to a different OS  license (where all communications stacks were 
provided with source) was needed so that the developers had the means to work 
on problems that had been long unaddressed.  Motorola beta tested this Release 
8 longer than typical because of the major impact such a change could 
potentially create.  However, it was eventually released (very recently), and 
some strange stack behaviors have begun to be noticed.

If I'm interpreting correctly this is a very different question, indeed.  It 
likely has to do with how APs and BH units prioritize responding to management 
communications over customer traffic.  It might even involve issue with the 
number of threads the OS can support.  The questioner is simply wondering if 
others have noticed known problems with SNMP polling of APs.  Canopy may have 
some issue, which could be significant to a wisp if he's become reliant upon 
network performance monitoring (which is a good thing IMO).

Rich
  - Original Message - 
  From: Marlon K. Schafer 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 11:01 AM
  Subject: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...


  I found this thread interesting.

  Enjoy,
  marlon

  - Original Message - 
  From: Patrick Leary 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 5:51 PM
  Subject: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...


  So a gent on the P15 Moto list asked a huge number of questions about Canopy. 
I thought it would be very interesting to attempt to answer them from a VL 
perspective. Since it took a ton of time, I wanted to get some use out them. 
Excellent questions actually. Pretty darned thorough.

   

  Patrick Leary 
  AVP WISP Markets 
  Alvarion, Inc. 
  o: 650.314.2628 
  c: 760.580.0080 
  Vonage: 650.641.1243 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Are modifications to the APs FCC legal?

No, but we numerous 3rd party sectors sectors certified that may e used. 
Our sectors range from 60, 90, and 120 degrees, plus omni choices (God forbid!)

How wide are the 5.7 AP channels, is this adjustable?  What would a SA
show the channel width to be?

Yes, 10 or 20 MHz wide. You can also change on the fly and all CPE will 
adjust automatically.

What is the real-world distance achieved in a LOS situation without
reflector, with?

The CPE with VL comes with an integrated antenna which enables on the VL to 
reach about 7 miles LOS at full capacity (32mbps net ftp), 16mbps at 5 miles, 
29mbps at 2 miles and 32mbps at 1 mile. The answer BTW to your Canopy question 
can be found on their doc CNPY-ADV-SUBMODFCT brochure produced in 2006. On that 
doc it says the range of the 5.7 w/o reflector is 14mbps to 1 mile and 7mbps to 
2 miles. Beyond that you must have a reflector. With the reflect you get 14mbps 
to 5 miles and 7mbps to 10 miles.

Are there any tools or utilities that Motorola or other offers to assist
in the network development of Canopy products?

There are things like link calculators, channel plan docs, and plenty of 
opportunity for direct consultation.

Can two SMs on the same AP talk to each other without special routing?

In VL it could be enabled via the many VLAN capabilities, which include 
QinQ VLAN support, but VL intentionally does not allow this out of the box (it 
is something the operator, i.e. you, should have control over.)

Explain how the Advantage 14MB/s (or 20MB/s) works, how is that
allocated, how true are those figures?  Is the allocation dynamic?  Can
you mix breeds of SM on the AP?

VL uses OFDM, which gives it some NLOS abilities (not so much with trees, 
but it also helps a bit there). The OFDM we uses adaptive modulates 

RE: [WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

2007-03-10 Thread JohnnyO
It's a great area sir ! 

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Wolfe
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 5:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

Hey Johnny, I would love too, but that one would require one heck of a 
PtP shot!. I don't think there is anyone there??.




JohnnyO wrote:
 Can Anyone service this location 
  
 Link to a google map -   Location

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=enq=41+39+13+-79+28+53layer=ie=UT
 F8z=9ll=41.752873,-79.035645spn=0.850327,2.768555om=1  to be
 serviced 
  
 How about Saxton PA 
  
 Regards,
  
 JohnnyO
   

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/717 - Release Date:
3/10/2007 2:25 PM


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

2007-03-10 Thread Tim Wolfe
Hey Johnny, I would love too, but that one would require one heck of a 
PtP shot!. I don't think there is anyone there??.





JohnnyO wrote:

Can Anyone service this location 
 
Link to a google map -   Location

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=enq=41+39+13+-79+28+53layer=ie=UT
F8z=9ll=41.752873,-79.035645spn=0.850327,2.768555om=1  to be
serviced 
 
How about Saxton PA 
 
Regards,
 
JohnnyO
  


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...

2007-03-10 Thread Ryan Langseth
Patrick would be able to provide you with more/better info. But here is
a quick rundown.

On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 15:25 -0500, Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
 I'm sold.  Anyone wanna buy me some?  COMNET has nice pricing on CPE's, but
 are there any discounts on the AU's? 
I believe there are two versions of the AU available (the lower end one
is software upgradeable)

  There's so many parts it seems between
 the blade chassis and that, I don't even know what parts that I'd need to
 order.
The blade Chassis is for power, you can also buy individual power bricks
for the AUs. The chassis provides the benifit of redundant power to each
IDU. and a clean install. the Chassis will also work with other types of
Alvarion AUs, I believe.
 
 Also, I was concerned with the blade chassis that 200' of LMR400 would be
 too lossy to be useful - or does this have some kind of low frequency IF
 signalling that's used on the cable itself?  Some equipment I've noticed
 uses a much lower frequency up the tower that even LMR175 could be used.
Its cat5 from the chassis to the AU, the chassis is just for power.

 
 Can I use this on an non-live, unipole, AM radio tower?
 
 Thanks

Your welcome,

Ryan

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Window decal

2007-03-10 Thread Ryan Langseth
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 10:44 -0800, CHUCK PROFITO wrote:
 Anybody have some generic hotspot window decals. We have eight open
 hotspots, but they have been asking for interior window decals, like the
 MasterCard / visa ones.  I would like to by 10 to 20 or what ever you can
 spare.
 
Add Free wireless to this and you have one, plus its a vector graphic so
its nice and scalable

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Wireless_tower.svg

Ryan


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

2007-03-10 Thread Tim Wolfe
If it is that great?, maybe we should hang an AP and get busy?. Do you 
know any good consultants that could show us how to do it?., LOL! :-$



JohnnyO wrote:
It's a great area sir ! 


JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Wolfe
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 5:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

Hey Johnny, I would love too, but that one would require one heck of a 
PtP shot!. I don't think there is anyone there??.





JohnnyO wrote:
  

Can Anyone service this location 
 
Link to a google map -   Location




http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=enq=41+39+13+-79+28+53layer=ie=UT
  

F8z=9ll=41.752873,-79.035645spn=0.850327,2.768555om=1  to be
serviced 
 
How about Saxton PA 
 
Regards,
 
JohnnyO
  



  


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

2007-03-10 Thread JohnnyO
How far away are you from that location ?

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Wolfe
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 8:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

If it is that great?, maybe we should hang an AP and get busy?. Do you 
know any good consultants that could show us how to do it?., LOL! :-$


JohnnyO wrote:
 It's a great area sir ! 

 JohnnyO

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Tim Wolfe
 Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 5:58 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

 Hey Johnny, I would love too, but that one would require one heck of a

 PtP shot!. I don't think there is anyone there??.




 JohnnyO wrote:
   
 Can Anyone service this location 
  
 Link to a google map -   Location

 

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=enq=41+39+13+-79+28+53layer=ie=UT
   
 F8z=9ll=41.752873,-79.035645spn=0.850327,2.768555om=1  to be
 serviced 
  
 How about Saxton PA 
  
 Regards,
  
 JohnnyO
   
 

   

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/717 - Release Date:
3/10/2007 2:25 PM


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...

2007-03-10 Thread Patrick Shoemaker

Could you forward along the Motorola thread as well for comparison?  Thanks.

Patrick


Marlon K. Schafer wrote:


I found this thread interesting.

Enjoy,
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 5:51 PM

Subject: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...


So a gent on the P15 Moto list asked a huge number of questions about Canopy. I 
thought it would be very interesting to attempt to answer them from a VL 
perspective. Since it took a ton of time, I wanted to get some use out them. 
Excellent questions actually. Pretty darned thorough.



Patrick Leary 
AVP WISP Markets 
Alvarion, Inc. 
o: 650.314.2628 
c: 760.580.0080 
Vonage: 650.641.1243 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


 Are modifications to the APs FCC legal?

 No, but we numerous 3rd party sectors sectors certified that may e used. Our 
sectors range from 60, 90, and 120 degrees, plus omni choices (God forbid!)

 How wide are the 5.7 AP channels, is this adjustable?  What would a SA
 show the channel width to be?

 Yes, 10 or 20 MHz wide. You can also change on the fly and all CPE will adjust 
automatically.

 What is the real-world distance achieved in a LOS situation without
 reflector, with?

 The CPE with VL comes with an integrated antenna which enables on the VL to 
reach about 7 miles LOS at full capacity (32mbps net ftp), 16mbps at 5 miles, 
29mbps at 2 miles and 32mbps at 1 mile. The answer BTW to your Canopy question 
can be found on their doc CNPY-ADV-SUBMODFCT brochure produced in 2006. On that 
doc it says the range of the 5.7 w/o reflector is 14mbps to 1 mile and 7mbps to 
2 miles. Beyond that you must have a reflector. With the reflect you get 14mbps 
to 5 miles and 7mbps to 10 miles.

 Are there any tools or utilities that Motorola or other offers to assist
 in the network development of Canopy products?

 There are things like link calculators, channel plan docs, and plenty of 
opportunity for direct consultation.

 Can two SMs on the same AP talk to each other without special routing?

 In VL it could be enabled via the many VLAN capabilities, which include QinQ 
VLAN support, but VL intentionally does not allow this out of the box (it is 
something the operator, i.e. you, should have control over.)

 Explain how the Advantage 14MB/s (or 20MB/s) works, how is that
 allocated, how true are those figures?  Is the allocation dynamic?  Can
 you mix breeds of SM on the AP?

 VL uses OFDM, which gives it some NLOS abilities (not so much with trees, but 
it also helps a bit there). The OFDM we uses adaptive modulates (dynamic) to 
maintain the best connection. Each mod level down is a lower rate. You can also 
set the radio to fix on a modulation level if you wish. All VL CPE versions 
work seamlessly together in any sector.

 Can an SM access the AP it's on for management?

 In VL the operator can assign multiple stations for management access.

 Is there a feature to disable broadcast traffic?

 Yes, VL has a broadcast rate limiting feature which can be set per 
subscriber. It can also send you a trap if any set station nears its limit.

 Why can't the APs use horizontal polarization?  Doesn't this limit the
 radio's ability to co-locate?

 The CPEs now have an option (in the rev E version hardware) to be either H or 
V pol mounted. The AUs can be mounted either way (by way of antenna choice).

 Why is the latency so high for the APs (5-7ms)?

 N/A, but looking in terms of a specific application, the delay with the optional 
WLP (wireless link prioritization feature) feature is stable at 4 or less ms.

  


 What is the maximum PPS per AP?

 Up to about 6 downstream and 48000 upstream.

 Are there any tools to prevent or reduce the impact from an end-user
 launching a DoS attack?

 Yes, the broadcast rate limiting feature was designed specifically because of 
this threat.

 How do the APs handle VoIP traffic?  Is there anything that can assist
 this?

 Better, literally, than any other AP in unlicensed, with up 288 CONCURRENT VoIP calls per AP (we call them AUs) with a MOS of better than 4.0. With the WLP feature implemented, MOS is typically over 4.1 and many tests show over 4.4. (I have some great VoIP graphs). We can also run tons of concurrent data. The graphs show this too. 


 What is a realistic number of concurrent VoIP sessions an AP can handle?

 VL is the only product that can literally and dynamically prioritize VoIP over 
the entire pipe and across the entire sector (versus just dedicating a 
partition that must be allocated whether used or not). At the same time, VL has 
a starvation prevention mechanism to prevent starvation of low priority traffic.

 Are there any known problems with over-polling an AP with SNMP?

 We do not use polling. In our view it is less efficient than our 
implementation.

 Are the SMs SNMP capable, or only the data from a SM through the AP?

 Yes, if set to be one of the management consoles.

 What improvements over the current 

RE: [WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

2007-03-10 Thread Rick Smith
heh.  My closest tower is 282 miles from there.

LOL

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JohnnyO
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 10:14 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

How far away are you from that location ?

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Wolfe
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 8:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

If it is that great?, maybe we should hang an AP and get busy?. Do you 
know any good consultants that could show us how to do it?., LOL! :-$


JohnnyO wrote:
 It's a great area sir ! 

 JohnnyO

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Tim Wolfe
 Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 5:58 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] NorthWest PA / SouthEast PA - Service Needed

 Hey Johnny, I would love too, but that one would require one heck of a

 PtP shot!. I don't think there is anyone there??.




 JohnnyO wrote:
   
 Can Anyone service this location 
  
 Link to a google map -   Location

 

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=enq=41+39+13+-79+28+53layer=ie=UT
   
 F8z=9ll=41.752873,-79.035645spn=0.850327,2.768555om=1  to be
 serviced 
  
 How about Saxton PA 
  
 Regards,
  
 JohnnyO
   
 

   

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/717 - Release Date:
3/10/2007 2:25 PM


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/