Re: [WISPA] omni upside down

2010-01-27 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Our antennas aren't made for this.  You'll have to get creative in finding 
ways to keep water out and leg condensation get out.
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: "RickG" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] omni upside down


> Thanks!
> Is there any advantage for a WISP to do this?
> -RickG
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Eje Gustafsson  
> wrote:
>
>> Those are more than likely cell phone sites that have those big whip
>> antennas going up and down (believe they are 800Mhz frequency range
>> systems)
>> My understanding it has one out of two reasons why they are built like
>> that.
>> Antenna diversion or increased base station density.
>> Have one not too far from me that has a crown with a total of 6 omni's. 3
>> up
>> and 3 down, mounted on a triangular crown. Those omnis are massive and my
>> guess are they are at least 10-15 feet it's hard to tell because the 
>> access
>> road is blocked and I never walked down to get close enough to compare to
>> the tower leg joints.
>>
>> / Eje
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of RickG
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:55 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: [WISPA] omni upside down
>>
>> While traveling around, I've noticed a few towers with omnis mounted 
>> upside
>> down with a neighbor omni mounted right side up. Whats the purpose in 
>> this?
>> -RickG
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>> 
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Fw: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM

2010-01-27 Thread MDK
That's similar to a problem I had in one of my towns.   The noise was so 
bad, that at -50,  900mhz stuff would not connect or pass data, if it 
managed to connect.

It died every night at sunset... but did not get relieved until during the 
day.   Not sunrise, but sometime later, in the morning.

We never found the source of the noise.   I gave up and ditched 900 in that 
little town.



--
From: "Marlon K. Schafer" 
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 6:26 AM
To: "WISPA General List" 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM

> Yep.  But I've heard of WISP power supplies causing interference on VHF 
> two
> way radios too.
>
> Just pointing out the strange things that can happen when RF is involved.
> Hoping to help someone out
> marlon
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Philip Dorr" 
> To: "WISPA General List" 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM
>
>
>>I do not know what frequency the first one is on, but the second one,
>> AM and 160/80/40 Meters, covers from 535kHz to 7.3MHz.  (AM is
>> 535-1705kHz, 160 Meters is 1.8-2.0MHz, 80 Meters is 3.5-4.0MHz, and 40
>> Meters is 7.0-7.3MHz) That is all way lower than most, if not all,
>> WISP equipment operates at.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Marlon K. Schafer
>>  wrote:
>>> Some more ideas...
>>> marlon
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "larryjspamme...@teleport.com" 
>>> To: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics."
>>> 
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:48 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM
>>>
>>>
A little over a year ago, my new neighbor put up a nice flagpole in his
front yard, with some low-voltage spotlights controlled by a LV power
supply with a photocell. Every evening, about sunset, 80 and 160 meters
suddenly had a terrible noise level - I could even drive by his house
listening to the AM broadcast band in the car and hear the racket.

 I took my portable FT-817 HF transceiver out with me while walking
 around,
 and found that the noise was indeed coming from his place. Once I found
 out exactly where all the noise was coming from, I took my AM portable
 radio over and showed the neighbor. and I covered/uncovered the
 photocell,
 turning on and off the noise along with the flagpole spotlights. When 
 he
 saw what was happening, he told me to go ahead and unplug the supply
 completely (feeding the spotlights), and agreed to bury the LV wire
 instead of leaving it lying on the ground from the supply to the 
 lights.

 Some of these LV supplies can make a huge amount of noise! Same with my
 laptop PC supply - I have to unplug the supply and run on batteries
 only,
 if I want to work 160/80/40 Meters while it's on. I've tried toroids on
 the supply line (input and output) and the phone line - no help at all.
 I
 hope that DXpeditions try their logging PCs and networks thoroughly
 before
 leaving on a big trip, otherwise, they may be logging by hand and
 manually
 entering the contacts into the PC log later, when they find out the PCs
 keep them from hearing weak signals.

 The noise I was picking up was on both an 80-Meter dipole, and a
 multiband
 vertical, several hundred feet from the noisy flagpole spotlights.

 LJ


 -Original Message-
>From: anthony 
>Sent: Jan 26, 2010 3:05 PM
>To: towert...@contesting.com
>Subject: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM
>
>Gene mentioned the ouside light. The light is a motion sensor type. 
>When
>I
>turned the inside switch off the noise disappeared. YAAAY!! Thanks to
>everyone who helped me on this one. You guys are A#1. now I need to go
>to
>lowes and purchase a new non sensor type light. The sensor is great 
>when
>you walk up to the door at night but my SW dxing takes presidence. 73s
>
>tony k2vi
>___
>
>
>
>___
>TowerTalk mailing list
>towert...@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

 ___



 ___
 TowerTalk mailing list
 towert...@contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> 
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipe

Re: [WISPA] omni upside down

2010-01-27 Thread Leon D. Zetekoff
On 1/27/2010 4:06 PM, RickG wrote:
> Thanks!
> Is there any advantage for a WISP to do this?
> -RickG
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Eje Gustafsson  wrote:
>
>
>> Those are more than likely cell phone sites that have those big whip
>> antennas going up and down (believe they are 800Mhz frequency range
>> systems)
>> My understanding it has one out of two reasons why they are built like
>> that.
>> Antenna diversion or increased base station density.
>>  
on thing you could do with an  upside down antenna is if your antenna is 
down in a valley and need uptilt that would shoot it up slightly.

Leon



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] omni upside down

2010-01-27 Thread RickG
My guess was #1. Interesting enough, I have several HighGain Omni units <
http://www.l-com.com/productfamily.aspx?id=6414> that work really well. They
dont have the drain hole on the bottom (I had one fill up with water once).
At any rate, I have two water towers within a 1/10th of a mile on each side
of a  ridge. Each side feeds locatins that cant see the other water tank.
So, both have omnis and I'm wondering if it would help to mount one of the
omnis upside down and get some diversity. ?


On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Bob Moldashel  wrote:

> A couple of reasons
>
> 1.  Antenna mounting space reuse. Standoffs have antennas facing up but
> not down. Allows the use of multiple antennas on one mount.
>
> 2. Omni antenna designs that will provide more saturation and downtilt
> when inverted as an omni has natural "uptilt" when mounted normally.
> You will usually find cell sites (usually old Nextel Sites) where the
> omni's are mounted inverted to better saturate a local area.
>
> NOTE:  The antennas are specially made to be inverted.  Do not try this
> with something off the shelf.  Most omnis have vent holes to drain
> moisture. Invert them and you will loose this ability in most cases.
>
> -B-
>
>
> RickG wrote:
> > While traveling around, I've noticed a few towers with omnis mounted
> upside
> > down with a neighbor omni mounted right side up. Whats the purpose in
> this?
> > -RickG
> >
> >
> >
> 
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> >
> 
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] omni upside down

2010-01-27 Thread Bob Moldashel
A couple of reasons

1.  Antenna mounting space reuse. Standoffs have antennas facing up but 
not down. Allows the use of multiple antennas on one mount.

2. Omni antenna designs that will provide more saturation and downtilt 
when inverted as an omni has natural "uptilt" when mounted normally.  
You will usually find cell sites (usually old Nextel Sites) where the 
omni's are mounted inverted to better saturate a local area.

NOTE:  The antennas are specially made to be inverted.  Do not try this 
with something off the shelf.  Most omnis have vent holes to drain 
moisture. Invert them and you will loose this ability in most cases.

-B-


RickG wrote:
> While traveling around, I've noticed a few towers with omnis mounted upside
> down with a neighbor omni mounted right side up. Whats the purpose in this?
> -RickG
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] omni upside down

2010-01-27 Thread Brian Webster
In the cellular industry the antennas for this purpose are manufactured to
be mounted upside down. Moisture and down tilt issues are dealt with in
manufacturing.



Thank You,
Brian Webster

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on
Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 4:25 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] omni upside down


Not much, probably if you need multiple omnis you would install sectors. But
if you need antenna diversity and use omnis this is one of the easier way to
do it since you just need one standoff bracket. However when doing need to
be wary of downtilt antennas especially for the omni tilted down and ensure
you have no weep holes or similar that now end up at the top of the antenna.

But with directional antennas on the client it seems base station diversity
is not any greater advantage. It's good for roaming mobile users (laptops,
pda, cellphones) that might not have direct LOS to the base station. On
Direct LOS there is no reason to use diversity unless you are doing a mimo
setup using a 2 chain radio.

/ Eje

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 3:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] omni upside down

Thanks!
Is there any advantage for a WISP to do this?
-RickG

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Eje Gustafsson  wrote:

> Those are more than likely cell phone sites that have those big whip
> antennas going up and down (believe they are 800Mhz frequency range
> systems)
> My understanding it has one out of two reasons why they are built like
> that.
> Antenna diversion or increased base station density.
> Have one not too far from me that has a crown with a total of 6 omni's. 3
> up
> and 3 down, mounted on a triangular crown. Those omnis are massive and my
> guess are they are at least 10-15 feet it's hard to tell because the
access
> road is blocked and I never walked down to get close enough to compare to
> the tower leg joints.
>
> / Eje
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of RickG
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:55 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] omni upside down
>
> While traveling around, I've noticed a few towers with omnis mounted
upside
> down with a neighbor omni mounted right side up. Whats the purpose in
this?
> -RickG
>
>
>
>

> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>

> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
>


> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>


>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] omni upside down

2010-01-27 Thread Eje Gustafsson
Not much, probably if you need multiple omnis you would install sectors. But
if you need antenna diversity and use omnis this is one of the easier way to
do it since you just need one standoff bracket. However when doing need to
be wary of downtilt antennas especially for the omni tilted down and ensure
you have no weep holes or similar that now end up at the top of the antenna.

But with directional antennas on the client it seems base station diversity
is not any greater advantage. It's good for roaming mobile users (laptops,
pda, cellphones) that might not have direct LOS to the base station. On
Direct LOS there is no reason to use diversity unless you are doing a mimo
setup using a 2 chain radio. 

/ Eje

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 3:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] omni upside down

Thanks!
Is there any advantage for a WISP to do this?
-RickG

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Eje Gustafsson  wrote:

> Those are more than likely cell phone sites that have those big whip
> antennas going up and down (believe they are 800Mhz frequency range
> systems)
> My understanding it has one out of two reasons why they are built like
> that.
> Antenna diversion or increased base station density.
> Have one not too far from me that has a crown with a total of 6 omni's. 3
> up
> and 3 down, mounted on a triangular crown. Those omnis are massive and my
> guess are they are at least 10-15 feet it's hard to tell because the
access
> road is blocked and I never walked down to get close enough to compare to
> the tower leg joints.
>
> / Eje
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of RickG
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:55 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] omni upside down
>
> While traveling around, I've noticed a few towers with omnis mounted
upside
> down with a neighbor omni mounted right side up. Whats the purpose in
this?
> -RickG
>
>
>
>

> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>

> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
>


> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>


>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] omni upside down

2010-01-27 Thread Justin Wilson
I would worry about if the antenna has any type of downtilt.  That would
then become uptilt.  Then you have to worry about sealing it well. Most
omnis have drain holes at the bottom.


Justin
-- 
Justin Wilson 
CCNA ­ CCNT ­ Mikrotik Advanced
http://www.mtin.net   - Homepage
http://www.mtin.net/blog  - Technical Blog

XISP solutions ­ Hosting ­ Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Web Design



From: RickG 
Reply-To: WISPA General List 
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:06:44 -0500
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] omni upside down

Thanks!
Is there any advantage for a WISP to do this?
-RickG

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Eje Gustafsson  wrote:

> Those are more than likely cell phone sites that have those big whip
> antennas going up and down (believe they are 800Mhz frequency range
> systems)
> My understanding it has one out of two reasons why they are built like
> that.
> Antenna diversion or increased base station density.
> Have one not too far from me that has a crown with a total of 6 omni's. 3
> up
> and 3 down, mounted on a triangular crown. Those omnis are massive and my
> guess are they are at least 10-15 feet it's hard to tell because the access
> road is blocked and I never walked down to get close enough to compare to
> the tower leg joints.
>
> / Eje
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of RickG
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:55 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] omni upside down
>
> While traveling around, I've noticed a few towers with omnis mounted upside
> down with a neighbor omni mounted right side up. Whats the purpose in this?
> -RickG
>
>
>
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
> 

> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 

>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] The Story of Medicine Bow Part 8 of 8 now online

2010-01-27 Thread Tom DeReggi
Good question

I can tell you Form477 did not report that high, but Form 477 data was still 
compelling. We had more lines than T1s did.  I think it was around 700,000 
by FCC data.
But dont hold me to that, I'm going on memory.

We also made our own best guess estimate. At one point, Patrick Leary did a 
FCC presentation, where Distributors were asked how many CPE's they sold, 
and back then I think from that calculation it was about $1mil or so.
At one point we counted total WISP, estimated average number of subs per 
WISP, and did the math. Not sure method used to estimate.
As well there was the Pew Report, suggesting 8% wireless take rate. Where as 
GAO was estimating closer to < 2% market share.

But to answer your question I do not remember the exact method that was 
used to calculate it, or who calcualted it, but its what the WISPA FCC 
filings have been stating, so it must be true :-)

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "David E. Smith" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The Story of Medicine Bow Part 8 of 8 now online


> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:09, Tom DeReggi 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> We have 2 million subs to prove it.
>
>
> I've heard this number bandied around a lot, including in some WISPA FCC
> filings. Anyone know the source of the "2 million" number?
>
> David Smith
> MVN.net
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] omni upside down

2010-01-27 Thread RickG
Thanks!
Is there any advantage for a WISP to do this?
-RickG

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Eje Gustafsson  wrote:

> Those are more than likely cell phone sites that have those big whip
> antennas going up and down (believe they are 800Mhz frequency range
> systems)
> My understanding it has one out of two reasons why they are built like
> that.
> Antenna diversion or increased base station density.
> Have one not too far from me that has a crown with a total of 6 omni's. 3
> up
> and 3 down, mounted on a triangular crown. Those omnis are massive and my
> guess are they are at least 10-15 feet it's hard to tell because the access
> road is blocked and I never walked down to get close enough to compare to
> the tower leg joints.
>
> / Eje
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of RickG
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:55 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] omni upside down
>
> While traveling around, I've noticed a few towers with omnis mounted upside
> down with a neighbor omni mounted right side up. Whats the purpose in this?
> -RickG
>
>
>
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] omni upside down

2010-01-27 Thread Eje Gustafsson
Those are more than likely cell phone sites that have those big whip
antennas going up and down (believe they are 800Mhz frequency range systems)
My understanding it has one out of two reasons why they are built like that.
Antenna diversion or increased base station density. 
Have one not too far from me that has a crown with a total of 6 omni's. 3 up
and 3 down, mounted on a triangular crown. Those omnis are massive and my
guess are they are at least 10-15 feet it's hard to tell because the access
road is blocked and I never walked down to get close enough to compare to
the tower leg joints. 

/ Eje

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] omni upside down

While traveling around, I've noticed a few towers with omnis mounted upside
down with a neighbor omni mounted right side up. Whats the purpose in this?
-RickG




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] omni upside down

2010-01-27 Thread RickG
While traveling around, I've noticed a few towers with omnis mounted upside
down with a neighbor omni mounted right side up. Whats the purpose in this?
-RickG



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo

2010-01-27 Thread RickG
Thats right. A good friend of mine who owns a datacenter has his own fiber
direct to the NAP and is paying .50/meg! If you can transport it and plug
in, things get much better. If you cant, they're still getting better, just
not as much.
-RickG

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:

> Location, location, location...
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."
> --- Albert Einstein
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Andy Trimmell  >wrote:
>
> > 50Mbit for $450 a month isn't bad for a pipe to AT&T. We're paying 10x
> that
> > from AT&T right now.
> >
> > $0.90? come on give me a break. If that's possible then we should sue
> AT&T
> > for highway robbery.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> > Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:26 PM
> > To: WISPA General List
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
> >
> > Did you mean $9/meg or $0.90/meg?  $9/meg isn't much to write home about.
> > ;-)
> >
> >
> > -
> > Mike Hammett
> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> > http://www.ics-il.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > From: "Justin Wilson" 
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 11:48 AM
> > To: "WISPA General List" ; "RickG"
> > 
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
> >
> > >Yup.  If you are at an on-net building you can get it even cheaper.
> > > One
> > > client is buying for $9 a meg in bulk in Chicago.  Their biggest hurdle
> > > are
> > > peering agreements with the big boys.  The AT&t¹s of the world are sort
> > of
> > > tolerating them at the moment until they can figure out what to do.
>  They
> > > tried de-peering with them a few years ago and there was an outcry.
>  Lots
> > > of
> > > web-sites are hosted on cogent bandwidth.
> > >
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > --
> > > Justin Wilson 
> > > CCNA ­ CCNT ­ Mikrotik Advanced
> > > http://www.mtin.net   - Homepage
> > > http://www.mtin.net/blog  - Technical Blog
> > >
> > > XISP solutions ­ Hosting ­ Consulting ­ Tower Climbing
> > >
> > >
> > > From: RickG 
> > > Reply-To: WISPA General List 
> > > Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:33:16 -0500
> > > To: WISPA General List 
> > > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
> > >
> > > I hear $1500 for a gig!
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Mike Hammett
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I wish I was a bit closer to a POP to take advantage of it, but my
> > Cogent
> > >> rep informed me that through the end of the month, they have a promo
> > >> going
> > >> $400/100 megabit 1 year contract.  Only available at Cogent and
> carrier
> > >> neutral data centers.  These facilities are listed on their web site
> > >> under
> > >> the network heading.  A complete building list (and not eligible for
> > this
> > >> promo) is available in the service locator under Dedicated Internet
> > >> access.
> > >>
> > >> Not all of their host buildings allow roof access, but I believe a
> > >> significant number of them do.  I encourage you to build your network
> > out
> > >> to
> > >> these facilities.
> > >>
> > >> Sure, someone's going to hop on here and complain about how horrible
> > >> Cogent
> > >> is, but every carrier has their good and bad spots.  I'm sure I could
> > >> find
> > >> someone to honestly say the same things about AT&T, VZB, Level3,
> > >> InterNAP,
> > >> XO, MZima, etc., etc.  It doesn't matter the carrier, I strongly
> > >> encourage
> > >> you to have more than one.
> > >>
> > >> Feel free to blast the list with questions about building your network
> > to
> > >> Cogent, routing policies to best combine Cogent and your existing
> > >> provider,
> > >> etc.  These things would apply to any carrier, not just Cogent.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> Mike Hammett
> > >> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> > >> http://www.ics-il.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> 
> > >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > >> http://signup.wispa.org/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> 
> > >>
> > >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> > >>
> > >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > >>
> > >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> > > 
> > > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > > http://signup.wispa.org/
> > >
> >
> 
> > > 
> > >
> > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> > >
> > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > >
> > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM

2010-01-27 Thread RickG
Great stuff Marlon!  Thanks! -RickG

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Marlon K. Schafer 
wrote:

> Thought this exchange might be of interest.  This is from a HAM list, but
> strange things happen to us from time to time too.
> marlon
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "anthony" 
> To: 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:05 PM
> Subject: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM
>
>
> > Gene mentioned the ouside light. The light is a motion sensor type. When
> I
> > turned the inside switch off the noise disappeared. YAAAY!! Thanks to
> > everyone who helped me on this one. You guys are A#1. now I need to go to
> > lowes and purchase a new non sensor type light. The sensor is great when
> > you walk up to the door at night but my SW dxing takes presidence. 73s
> >
> > tony k2vi
> > ___
>
>
> > Im sorry...A bit off topic but im at my wits end. Im getting heavy
> buzzing
>
> > noise in the broadcast band which is now unlistenable. I tried unplugging
> > everything but still noise. It only dissapears when i switch the family
> > room 20AMP breaker off at the main pannel. It totally dissapears. I
> > unplugged everthing in every room. What the heck can it be??? Could it
> > possibly be the breaker itself? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Im
> > lost on this one.
> >
> > tony k2vi
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > towert...@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Can anyone recommend a 5GHz grid antenna for UBNT forBullet M5HP

2010-01-27 Thread RickG
Cool! I've got several places to put them on my network. Thanks! -RickG

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Robert West wrote:

> Workin' on it, dude.  Being delivered Thursday.  Already have 2 customers
> in
> line for install with them.
>
> Bob-
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of RickG
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 2:40 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Can anyone recommend a 5GHz grid antenna for UBNT
> forBullet M5HP
>
> I want feedback on those!
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Mike Hammett
> wrote:
>
> > They have the AirGrid now.  :-p
> >
> >
> > -
> > Mike Hammett
> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> > http://www.ics-il.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > From: "Pat O'Connor" 
> > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 1:42 PM
> > To: "WISPA General List" 
> > Subject: [WISPA] Can anyone recommend a 5GHz grid antenna for UBNT
> > forBullet
> > M5HP
> >
> > > Just looking to see what everyone else is using.  I'm in the test phase
> > > of a 5.8Ghz AP roll out.
> > >
> > > TIA
> > >
> > > Pat
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> 
> 
> > > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > > http://signup.wispa.org/
> > >
> >
>
> 
> 
> > >
> > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> > >
> > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > >
> > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> 
> 
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> >
> >
>
> 
> 
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
>
>
>
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Syslog

2010-01-27 Thread Eje Gustafsson
Syslog is udp by default. This is what MikroTik expects it to be. 

/ Eje
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Syslog

Does anyone know if MT sends out syslog information on TCP or UDP?  I know 
it's port 514.  I've figured out how to have rsyslog listen to UDP 514, but 
not TCP.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: "Mike Hammett" 
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:05 AM
To: 
Subject: [WISPA] Syslog

> I'm looking to setup a syslog server.  Like most things open source, 
> there's a whole bunch of projects that sound great, but have been 
> abandoned for years.
>
> I'm looking for a setup that's hopefully backed by MySQL.  I'd like a GUI 
> of some sort as I really detest the CLI for most things.
>
> It looks like syslog-ng is the way to go, but the GUI part is difficult to

> figure out.
>
> oh, and Linux based.  Looking to run this in an OpenVZ container.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
>


> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>


>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Syslog

2010-01-27 Thread Mike Hammett
Does anyone know if MT sends out syslog information on TCP or UDP?  I know 
it's port 514.  I've figured out how to have rsyslog listen to UDP 514, but 
not TCP.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: "Mike Hammett" 
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:05 AM
To: 
Subject: [WISPA] Syslog

> I'm looking to setup a syslog server.  Like most things open source, 
> there's a whole bunch of projects that sound great, but have been 
> abandoned for years.
>
> I'm looking for a setup that's hopefully backed by MySQL.  I'd like a GUI 
> of some sort as I really detest the CLI for most things.
>
> It looks like syslog-ng is the way to go, but the GUI part is difficult to 
> figure out.
>
> oh, and Linux based.  Looking to run this in an OpenVZ container.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] The Story of Medicine Bow Part 8 of 8 now online

2010-01-27 Thread Mike Hammett
AFAIK, it's out of thin air.  A bunch of people believe the WISP industry is 
much larger than the form 477 indicates.  I would agree with them knowing 
how many people A) ignore the form 477 requirement, B) never even heard of 
477.

I believe form 477 indicates fewer fixed wireless subscribers than JAB 
Wireless has alone.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: "David E. Smith" 
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 12:25 PM
To: "WISPA General List" 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The Story of Medicine Bow Part 8 of 8 now online

> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:09, Tom DeReggi 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> We have 2 million subs to prove it.
>
>
> I've heard this number bandied around a lot, including in some WISPA FCC
> filings. Anyone know the source of the "2 million" number?
>
> David Smith
> MVN.net
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Side Mount to Wooden Utility Pole?

2010-01-27 Thread Mike
For all serious pole mounts, I use these:
http://www.sitepro1.com/store/cart.php?m=search_results&search=TCHM1

This would be for a micro-pop however, not for a home pole install.

I put a 10 foot 2" schedule 80 into these and out the top of the pole for
dish/panel install.

Mike


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 5:16 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Side Mount to Wooden Utility Pole?

Mike has used some decent looking chain mounts.  Hey Mike, any
suggestions???

Bob-

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 3:30 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Side Mount to Wooden Utility Pole?

I just use good lag screws on the standard (or long) sat arms most of the 
time.
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: "AJ" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 9:49 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Side Mount to Wooden Utility Pole?


> Anyone have any detailed photos or ideas for side mounting to a wooden
> utility pole?
>
> We have a site that will only allow side mounting at about 35' AGL on a
> wooden utility pole.
>
> I considered building a stand off bracket out of Unistrut and mounting it
> directly through the hole with galvanized hardware but it seems a bit
> overkill for a single omni.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>


> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>


>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] The Story of Medicine Bow Part 8 of 8 now online

2010-01-27 Thread David E. Smith
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:09, Tom DeReggi wrote:

>
> We have 2 million subs to prove it.


I've heard this number bandied around a lot, including in some WISPA FCC
filings. Anyone know the source of the "2 million" number?

David Smith
MVN.net



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] The Story of Medicine Bow Part 8 of 8 now online

2010-01-27 Thread Tom DeReggi
Matt,

I wanted to once again offer my praise for your fine 8 part story.  Finally, 
a read that reflects the true essance of what the WISP industry is all 
about.

We might not get broadband to the remaining 24 million unserved American 
homes overnight. But our Industry really does make an impact at 1-50 homes 
one day at a time.  We have 2 million subs to prove it.  I've always said, 
we can do it alone if we have to, but we could do so much more with just a 
LITTLE help.  I dont think many regulators really understand what that means 
yet, "a little help". I expecially like your closing paragraphs that spells 
it out  Something similar to Guarantees for a lot of $10k projects would 
go a lot further, than these few $multi-million projects.

I personally think your story deserves to be picked up by a major magazine 
or newspaper. In my opinion, every individual in government policy should 
read it, before they pass judgement on our industry.

I think the fact that your story is told from the perspective of rural 
America will help people more easilly visualize the issues. But the reality 
is there are a lot of Urban and Suburban Cowboys out there to.  Although the 
challenge are a bit different, they have similar impact.  But some of the 
most important points apply to us all. For example, the fact that WISP's 
effort are so quickly discounted as second best early in the process, but at 
the end of the day, we have a lot to offer and the ones comming to the table 
with a real solution.  A small town is relevent to us, so we get it done.

I hope everyone passes the link around.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "Matt Larsen - Lists" 
To: "Mikrotik discussions" ; "Motorola Canopy 
User Group" ; "WISPA General List" 
; "Telecom Regulation & the Internet" 
; ; "ip" 

Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 11:19 AM
Subject: [WISPA] The Story of Medicine Bow Part 8 of 8 now online


> The final installment of The Story of Medicine Bow is now online at
> http://www.wirelesscowboys.com/.This summarizes the final impact of
> the project three months later.
>
>
> Thanks to all of you who have been reading it!
>
> Matt Larsen
> Vistabeam.com
> Wirelesscowboys.com
> wispdirectory.com
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo

2010-01-27 Thread Tom DeReggi
Funny. Nice to have a reality check from Rural America. :-)

Looks like a BTOP/BIP middle mile grant is needed to your town..

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "jp" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo


> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:42:09AM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>
>> As Matt Larsen has been talking about, he built out 125 miles of backhaul 
>> to
>> connect his network back to civilization.  Others have even further to 
>> go.
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>
> Looks like we'd have to go across three states to get to a Cogent
> facility. Five states to get to Hurricane Electric.
>
> Colocation at their datacenter would be a pittance compared to the
> backhaul costs.
>
> -- 
> /*
> Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
>KB1IOJ|   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting
> http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Mainehttp://www.midcoast.com/
> */
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo

2010-01-27 Thread Justin Wilson
Plus they want to oversell this cheap bandwidth.  They don¹t want you to
max out that Gig circuit.  Allows them to oversell their bandwidth that much
more.
-- 



John,

You are correct, Gig is starting to go for $1-$2 per mb. Not only from
Hurricaine, although Hurricaine is clearly a disruptive force leader today.
Hurricaine is doing a big marketing push with Equinix, which I think is
really helping them expand both in market share and quality of peering.
Having to buy Gig quantity to get a discount is no longer a disadvantage
when it is 10x less per mb than 100mb quantity :-)

The problem is that nobody (End user customers) needs a Gig.  So providers
dont want to sell you a gig in remote buildings where there are customers
that you can resell to, or they under cut themselves.
They also cant do it in buildings where they have to buy/lease the fiber
from someone else, without multiple customers to share it. It has to be from
a place that they already cost justified the Dark fiber purchase.

Cost is still all about transport, getting into the colo.

<>


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] The Story of Medicine Bow Part 8 of 8 now online

2010-01-27 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists
The final installment of The Story of Medicine Bow is now online at 
http://www.wirelesscowboys.com/.This summarizes the final impact of 
the project three months later.


Thanks to all of you who have been reading it!

Matt Larsen
Vistabeam.com
Wirelesscowboys.com
wispdirectory.com




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo

2010-01-27 Thread Mike Hammett
Yeah, there's not much in Maine.  It's not between anywhere big on the 
Internet, so there's no need for the cables to go through there.

It is "only" 50% longer than Matt Larsen did 5 - 10 years ago.  I think 
Travis may even have single links further than that.  (This last bit meant 
jokingly.)


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: "jp" 
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:56 AM
To: "WISPA General List" 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo

> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:42:09AM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>
>> As Matt Larsen has been talking about, he built out 125 miles of backhaul 
>> to
>> connect his network back to civilization.  Others have even further to 
>> go.
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>
> Looks like we'd have to go across three states to get to a Cogent
> facility. Five states to get to Hurricane Electric.
>
> Colocation at their datacenter would be a pittance compared to the
> backhaul costs.
>
> -- 
> /*
> Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
>KB1IOJ|   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting
> http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Mainehttp://www.midcoast.com/
> */
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo

2010-01-27 Thread jp
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:42:09AM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
> 
> As Matt Larsen has been talking about, he built out 125 miles of backhaul to 
> connect his network back to civilization.  Others have even further to go.
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett

Looks like we'd have to go across three states to get to a Cogent 
facility. Five states to get to Hurricane Electric. 

Colocation at their datacenter would be a pittance compared to the 
backhaul costs.

-- 
/*
Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
KB1IOJ|   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting 
 http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Mainehttp://www.midcoast.com/
*/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo

2010-01-27 Thread Mike Hammett
Most resellers are cheaper, some even 50% cheaper.  They achieve this by 
buying say 300 gigs worth of traffic (getting a great rate), then splitting 
the difference between that rate and the carrier's retail rate.  They don't 
have any gear, they just tell the carrier to hook up a new port at X, which 
is really your equipment.

Once they have their own equipment, perform their own routing decisions, 
they're not merely a reseller anymore.  Their gear, route, routing, etc. 
make a "unique" product.

It's 15 miles from your home base to 3 buildings where you can obtain 
$4/megabit, and your network is 25 miles across.  Some of those have over 15 
carriers in them.  I can put you in touch my with Cogent rep to explore the 
options for getting roof space at one of these facilities to beam that 
signal out.

As Matt Larsen has been talking about, he built out 125 miles of backhaul to 
connect his network back to civilization.  Others have even further to go.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--
From: "Andy Trimmell" 
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 8:19 AM
To: "WISPA General List" 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo

> Resellers are a little bit more expensive actually and all of them don't 
> have fiber already ran. It's ridiculous the cost we pay.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of John Thomas
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 9:44 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
>
> We buy ours through a reseller, and they have quoted us $1000/month for
> Gig at Hurricane Electric in Fremont CA.
>
> John
>
>
> Mike Hammett wrote:
>> I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if GigE connections were under $1 
>> now.
>> I know a couple companies were at $1.
>>
>> Bandwidth pricing is the inverse of real estate pricing.  Downtown 
>> Chicago,
>> a sq.ft. of land could buy you hundreds of acres in Montana.  A single 
>> meg
>> in Montana could buy you hundreds of megs  (or a couple gigs) in Chicago.
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> From: "Andy Trimmell" 
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 2:20 PM
>> To: "WISPA General List" 
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
>>
>>
>>> 50Mbit for $450 a month isn't bad for a pipe to AT&T. We're paying 10x
>>> that from AT&T right now.
>>>
>>> $0.90? come on give me a break. If that's possible then we should sue 
>>> AT&T
>>> for highway robbery.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:26 PM
>>> To: WISPA General List
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
>>>
>>> Did you mean $9/meg or $0.90/meg?  $9/meg isn't much to write home 
>>> about.
>>> ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> From: "Justin Wilson" 
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 11:48 AM
>>> To: "WISPA General List" ; "RickG"
>>> 
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
>>>
>>>
Yup.  If you are at an on-net building you can get it even cheaper.
 One
 client is buying for $9 a meg in bulk in Chicago.  Their biggest hurdle
 are
 peering agreements with the big boys.  The AT&t¹s of the world are sort
 of
 tolerating them at the moment until they can figure out what to do. 
 They
 tried de-peering with them a few years ago and there was an outcry. 
 Lots
 of
 web-sites are hosted on cogent bandwidth.

 Justin

 -- 
 Justin Wilson 
 CCNA ­ CCNT ­ Mikrotik Advanced
 http://www.mtin.net   - Homepage
 http://www.mtin.net/blog  - Technical Blog

 XISP solutions ­ Hosting ­ Consulting ­ Tower Climbing


 From: RickG 
 Reply-To: WISPA General List 
 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:33:16 -0500
 To: WISPA General List 
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo

 I hear $1500 for a gig!

 On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Mike Hammett
 wrote:


> I wish I was a bit closer to a POP to take advantage of it, but my
> Cogent
> rep informed me that through the end of the month, they have a promo
> going
> $400/100 megabit 1 year contract.  Only available at Cogent and 
> carrier
> neutral data centers.  These facilities are listed on their web site
> under
> the network heading.  A complete building list (and not eligible for
> this
> promo) is available in the service locator under Dedicated Internet
> access.
>
> Not all of their host buildings allow roof access, but I believe a
> significant number of them do.  I encourage you to build your netw

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM

2010-01-27 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Yep.  But I've heard of WISP power supplies causing interference on VHF two 
way radios too.

Just pointing out the strange things that can happen when RF is involved. 
Hoping to help someone out
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: "Philip Dorr" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:10 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM


>I do not know what frequency the first one is on, but the second one,
> AM and 160/80/40 Meters, covers from 535kHz to 7.3MHz.  (AM is
> 535-1705kHz, 160 Meters is 1.8-2.0MHz, 80 Meters is 3.5-4.0MHz, and 40
> Meters is 7.0-7.3MHz) That is all way lower than most, if not all,
> WISP equipment operates at.
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Marlon K. Schafer
>  wrote:
>> Some more ideas...
>> marlon
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "larryjspamme...@teleport.com" 
>> To: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." 
>> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:48 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM
>>
>>
>>>A little over a year ago, my new neighbor put up a nice flagpole in his
>>>front yard, with some low-voltage spotlights controlled by a LV power
>>>supply with a photocell. Every evening, about sunset, 80 and 160 meters
>>>suddenly had a terrible noise level - I could even drive by his house
>>>listening to the AM broadcast band in the car and hear the racket.
>>>
>>> I took my portable FT-817 HF transceiver out with me while walking 
>>> around,
>>> and found that the noise was indeed coming from his place. Once I found
>>> out exactly where all the noise was coming from, I took my AM portable
>>> radio over and showed the neighbor. and I covered/uncovered the 
>>> photocell,
>>> turning on and off the noise along with the flagpole spotlights. When he
>>> saw what was happening, he told me to go ahead and unplug the supply
>>> completely (feeding the spotlights), and agreed to bury the LV wire
>>> instead of leaving it lying on the ground from the supply to the lights.
>>>
>>> Some of these LV supplies can make a huge amount of noise! Same with my
>>> laptop PC supply - I have to unplug the supply and run on batteries 
>>> only,
>>> if I want to work 160/80/40 Meters while it's on. I've tried toroids on
>>> the supply line (input and output) and the phone line - no help at all. 
>>> I
>>> hope that DXpeditions try their logging PCs and networks thoroughly 
>>> before
>>> leaving on a big trip, otherwise, they may be logging by hand and 
>>> manually
>>> entering the contacts into the PC log later, when they find out the PCs
>>> keep them from hearing weak signals.
>>>
>>> The noise I was picking up was on both an 80-Meter dipole, and a 
>>> multiband
>>> vertical, several hundred feet from the noisy flagpole spotlights.
>>>
>>> LJ
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
From: anthony 
Sent: Jan 26, 2010 3:05 PM
To: towert...@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM

Gene mentioned the ouside light. The light is a motion sensor type. When 
I
turned the inside switch off the noise disappeared. YAAAY!! Thanks to
everyone who helped me on this one. You guys are A#1. now I need to go 
to
lowes and purchase a new non sensor type light. The sensor is great when
you walk up to the door at night but my SW dxing takes presidence. 73s

tony k2vi
___



___
TowerTalk mailing list
towert...@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>
>>> ___
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> towert...@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailma

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo

2010-01-27 Thread Andy Trimmell
Resellers are a little bit more expensive actually and all of them don't have 
fiber already ran. It's ridiculous the cost we pay.

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of John Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 9:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo

We buy ours through a reseller, and they have quoted us $1000/month for 
Gig at Hurricane Electric in Fremont CA.

John


Mike Hammett wrote:
> I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if GigE connections were under $1 now. 
> I know a couple companies were at $1.
>
> Bandwidth pricing is the inverse of real estate pricing.  Downtown Chicago, 
> a sq.ft. of land could buy you hundreds of acres in Montana.  A single meg 
> in Montana could buy you hundreds of megs  (or a couple gigs) in Chicago.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "Andy Trimmell" 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 2:20 PM
> To: "WISPA General List" 
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
>
>   
>> 50Mbit for $450 a month isn't bad for a pipe to AT&T. We're paying 10x 
>> that from AT&T right now.
>>
>> $0.90? come on give me a break. If that's possible then we should sue AT&T 
>> for highway robbery.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
>> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:26 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
>>
>> Did you mean $9/meg or $0.90/meg?  $9/meg isn't much to write home about.
>> ;-)
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> From: "Justin Wilson" 
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 11:48 AM
>> To: "WISPA General List" ; "RickG"
>> 
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
>>
>> 
>>>Yup.  If you are at an on-net building you can get it even cheaper.
>>> One
>>> client is buying for $9 a meg in bulk in Chicago.  Their biggest hurdle
>>> are
>>> peering agreements with the big boys.  The AT&t¹s of the world are sort 
>>> of
>>> tolerating them at the moment until they can figure out what to do.  They
>>> tried de-peering with them a few years ago and there was an outcry.  Lots
>>> of
>>> web-sites are hosted on cogent bandwidth.
>>>
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Justin Wilson 
>>> CCNA ­ CCNT ­ Mikrotik Advanced
>>> http://www.mtin.net   - Homepage
>>> http://www.mtin.net/blog  - Technical Blog
>>>
>>> XISP solutions ­ Hosting ­ Consulting ­ Tower Climbing
>>>
>>>
>>> From: RickG 
>>> Reply-To: WISPA General List 
>>> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:33:16 -0500
>>> To: WISPA General List 
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
>>>
>>> I hear $1500 for a gig!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Mike Hammett
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>   
 I wish I was a bit closer to a POP to take advantage of it, but my 
 Cogent
 rep informed me that through the end of the month, they have a promo
 going
 $400/100 megabit 1 year contract.  Only available at Cogent and carrier
 neutral data centers.  These facilities are listed on their web site
 under
 the network heading.  A complete building list (and not eligible for 
 this
 promo) is available in the service locator under Dedicated Internet
 access.

 Not all of their host buildings allow roof access, but I believe a
 significant number of them do.  I encourage you to build your network 
 out
 to
 these facilities.

 Sure, someone's going to hop on here and complain about how horrible
 Cogent
 is, but every carrier has their good and bad spots.  I'm sure I could
 find
 someone to honestly say the same things about AT&T, VZB, Level3,
 InterNAP,
 XO, MZima, etc., etc.  It doesn't matter the carrier, I strongly
 encourage
 you to have more than one.

 Feel free to blast the list with questions about building your network 
 to
 Cogent, routing policies to best combine Cogent and your existing
 provider,
 etc.  These things would apply to any carrier, not just Cogent.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com





 
>>> 
>>>   
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 
>>> 
>>>   
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 
>>> -

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM

2010-01-27 Thread Bret Clark




Yeah, but I think the point is that there are a lot of devices out
there that splash well beyond the frequencies they are suppose to be
in. I remember in the early 90's while developing some of the 802.11
original 2Mbps FH stuff that every day around lunch time we'd have an
awful noise floor. Turned out to be the office microwaves that were not
we'll shielded that well...after that I learned to stand rather far
away from those microwave's when cooking my lunch :)!

Bret


Philip Dorr wrote:

  I do not know what frequency the first one is on, but the second one,
AM and 160/80/40 Meters, covers from 535kHz to 7.3MHz.  (AM is
535-1705kHz, 160 Meters is 1.8-2.0MHz, 80 Meters is 3.5-4.0MHz, and 40
Meters is 7.0-7.3MHz) That is all way lower than most, if not all,
WISP equipment operates at.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Marlon K. Schafer
 wrote:
  
  
Some more ideas...
marlon

- Original Message -
From: "larryjspamme...@teleport.com" 
To: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." 
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM




  A  little over a year ago, my new neighbor put up a nice flagpole in his
front yard, with some low-voltage spotlights controlled by a LV power
supply with a photocell. Every evening, about sunset, 80 and 160 meters
suddenly had a terrible noise level - I could even drive by his house
listening to the AM broadcast band in the car and hear the racket.

I took my portable FT-817 HF transceiver out with me while walking around,
and found that the noise was indeed coming from his place. Once I found
out exactly where all the noise was coming from, I took my AM portable
radio over and showed the neighbor. and I covered/uncovered the photocell,
turning on and off the noise along with the flagpole spotlights. When he
saw what was happening, he told me to go ahead and unplug the supply
completely (feeding the spotlights), and agreed to bury the LV wire
instead of leaving it lying on the ground from the supply to the lights.

Some of these LV supplies can make a huge amount of noise! Same with my
laptop PC supply - I have to unplug the supply and run on batteries only,
if I want to work 160/80/40 Meters while it's on. I've tried toroids on
the supply line (input and output) and the phone line - no help at all. I
hope that DXpeditions try their logging PCs and networks thoroughly before
leaving on a big trip, otherwise, they may be logging by hand and manually
entering the contacts into the PC log later, when they find out the PCs
keep them from hearing weak signals.

The noise I was picking up was on both an 80-Meter dipole, and a multiband
vertical, several hundred feet from the noisy flagpole spotlights.

LJ


-Original Message-
  
  
From: anthony 
Sent: Jan 26, 2010 3:05 PM
To: towert...@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM

Gene mentioned the ouside light. The light is a motion sensor type. When I
turned the inside switch off the noise disappeared. YAAAY!! Thanks to
everyone who helped me on this one. You guys are A#1. now I need to go to
lowes and purchase a new non sensor type light. The sensor is great when
you walk up to the door at night but my SW dxing takes presidence. 73s

tony k2vi
___



___
TowerTalk mailing list
towert...@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

  
  ___



___
TowerTalk mailing list
towert...@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
  




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  
  


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM

2010-01-27 Thread Philip Dorr
I do not know what frequency the first one is on, but the second one,
AM and 160/80/40 Meters, covers from 535kHz to 7.3MHz.  (AM is
535-1705kHz, 160 Meters is 1.8-2.0MHz, 80 Meters is 3.5-4.0MHz, and 40
Meters is 7.0-7.3MHz) That is all way lower than most, if not all,
WISP equipment operates at.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Marlon K. Schafer
 wrote:
> Some more ideas...
> marlon
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "larryjspamme...@teleport.com" 
> To: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM
>
>
>>A  little over a year ago, my new neighbor put up a nice flagpole in his
>>front yard, with some low-voltage spotlights controlled by a LV power
>>supply with a photocell. Every evening, about sunset, 80 and 160 meters
>>suddenly had a terrible noise level - I could even drive by his house
>>listening to the AM broadcast band in the car and hear the racket.
>>
>> I took my portable FT-817 HF transceiver out with me while walking around,
>> and found that the noise was indeed coming from his place. Once I found
>> out exactly where all the noise was coming from, I took my AM portable
>> radio over and showed the neighbor. and I covered/uncovered the photocell,
>> turning on and off the noise along with the flagpole spotlights. When he
>> saw what was happening, he told me to go ahead and unplug the supply
>> completely (feeding the spotlights), and agreed to bury the LV wire
>> instead of leaving it lying on the ground from the supply to the lights.
>>
>> Some of these LV supplies can make a huge amount of noise! Same with my
>> laptop PC supply - I have to unplug the supply and run on batteries only,
>> if I want to work 160/80/40 Meters while it's on. I've tried toroids on
>> the supply line (input and output) and the phone line - no help at all. I
>> hope that DXpeditions try their logging PCs and networks thoroughly before
>> leaving on a big trip, otherwise, they may be logging by hand and manually
>> entering the contacts into the PC log later, when they find out the PCs
>> keep them from hearing weak signals.
>>
>> The noise I was picking up was on both an 80-Meter dipole, and a multiband
>> vertical, several hundred feet from the noisy flagpole spotlights.
>>
>> LJ
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>>From: anthony 
>>>Sent: Jan 26, 2010 3:05 PM
>>>To: towert...@contesting.com
>>>Subject: [TowerTalk] FOUND THE NOISE PROBLEM
>>>
>>>Gene mentioned the ouside light. The light is a motion sensor type. When I
>>>turned the inside switch off the noise disappeared. YAAAY!! Thanks to
>>>everyone who helped me on this one. You guys are A#1. now I need to go to
>>>lowes and purchase a new non sensor type light. The sensor is great when
>>>you walk up to the door at night but my SW dxing takes presidence. 73s
>>>
>>>tony k2vi
>>>___
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>___
>>>TowerTalk mailing list
>>>towert...@contesting.com
>>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>> ___
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> towert...@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/