Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?

2011-07-28 Thread Josh Luthman
But a Ubiuiti radio could do that for 500.  A ptp230 or 250 could get
close.  Mikrotik could do that for probably 500.

Double up on hardware and you're still way under budget.
On Jul 28, 2011 1:25 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists li...@manageisp.com wrote:
 I have had one of the Ligowave (SAF) 24ghz 100meg radios in service for
 almost two years on a three mile link. It has been an outstanding
 piece of equipment in the time that we have had it. A few months ago,
 after a discussion on list, we figured out that we did not have the
 cross-polarization set up correctly, so we fixed it and saw our
 throughput go from 60meg to 100meg full duplex along with another 15db
 of fade margin. We have had some occasional rain fade, but no outages
 lasted more than five minutes. I do wish that there was an option for a
 bigger dish, as being able to go 6-8 miles would be very handy.

 The link that we have it on used to be fed by a 100meg fiber connection
 that cost $500/month. We spent $8000 on the Ligo radio, so it paid for
 itself in 16 months. I think that is pretty useful!

 Matt Larsen
 vistabeam.com

 On 7/27/2011 8:20 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 I was just kind of thinking what use there would be for a 100 mbps
 radio in 24 Ghz. Limitation of just a couple of miles like 60 Ghz,
 too. Unless the two other ethernet ports can be used to aggregate
 more bandwidth?

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373


 On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Bob Moldashel lakel...@gbcx.net
 mailto:lakel...@gbcx.net wrote:

 Maybe it is. I am only going by word of mouth on that. That's
 why I said I am told.. Don't want to put my foot in my mouth...

 :-)




 On 7/27/2011 10:11 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:

 That's weird, FCC regulations specify cross Pol... I think this
 radio is for Licensed 24 ?

 Gino A. Villarini

 g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com

 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

 787.273.4143 tel:787.273.4143

 *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Bob Moldashel
 *Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
 *To:* wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
 *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?

 Two more things...

 Radio has built in spectrum analyzer that works :-)

 And I am told link is plane polarity so only uses one
 polarity plane for data...Not two.

 -B-



 On 7/27/2011 10:03 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

 What kind of dishes can you use in 24ghz? What ranges can you do
 with them?

 On Jul 27, 2011 9:56 PM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
 mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
  Nice! Price?
 
  Gino A. Villarini
  g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
  Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
  787.273.4143 tel:787.273.4143
 
  -Original Message-
  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
  Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
 
  No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec sheet attached
 
 
  -B-
 
 
 
 
  On 7/27/2011 9:44 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
  IIRC the Exalt unit is for Licensed Fiber Tower Freqs? No?
 
  Gino A. Villarini
  g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
  Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
  787.273.4143 tel:787.273.4143
 
  -Original Message-
  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
  On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
  Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:50 PM
  To: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
 
  The Snaplink only does about 22 Mbps.
 
  Exalt just came out with a 24 Ghz. Full Duplex TDD radio that
 will do
  100 Mbps and is capable of 3 non-overlapping channels. The
 price is the same or cheaper.
 
  I believe its 2 year warranty also.
 
  -B-
 
 
 
 
 
 
  On 7/27/2011 7:23 PM, Adam Greene wrote:
  Has anyone tried the SnapLink Blast?
 
 http://www.wisptech.com/index.php/Microwave_Backhaul_Comparison_Chart
  shows 24GHz, 160M half-duplex, $6k ... if it really works,
 that's
  pretty good, in my book
 
  On 7/26/2011 10:47 AM, Adam Greene wrote:
  This question has probably been asked on this list before
 ... if
  needed, just tell me to check the archives ...
 
  Becoming increasingly frustrated with chasing apparent
 interference
  issues on our Alvarion Mikrotik 2.4GHz and 5.4 - 5.8GHz
 point to point
  links, I am wondering if anyone has a suggestion for a
  non-2.4GHz/5.8GHz solution that can do ~50Mbps full duplex
 or above
  (or even a little less). For example, maybe something on the
 24GHz
  frequency? Or even licensed, if the license is inexpensive
 enough
  and easy to obtain. Kind of shying away from 3.65GHz because
 of the
  cumbersome process 

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?

2011-07-28 Thread Cameron Crum
I think Matt's advantage is the licensed freq. There is something to be said
for putting it up and forgetting it. With unlicensed BH you are always going
to be fighting the interference monster. I guess it depends on your budget
and time.

Cameron

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:

 But a Ubiuiti radio could do that for 500.  A ptp230 or 250 could get
 close.  Mikrotik could do that for probably 500.

 Double up on hardware and you're still way under budget.
 On Jul 28, 2011 1:25 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists li...@manageisp.com
 wrote:
  I have had one of the Ligowave (SAF) 24ghz 100meg radios in service for
  almost two years on a three mile link. It has been an outstanding
  piece of equipment in the time that we have had it. A few months ago,
  after a discussion on list, we figured out that we did not have the
  cross-polarization set up correctly, so we fixed it and saw our
  throughput go from 60meg to 100meg full duplex along with another 15db
  of fade margin. We have had some occasional rain fade, but no outages
  lasted more than five minutes. I do wish that there was an option for a
  bigger dish, as being able to go 6-8 miles would be very handy.
 
  The link that we have it on used to be fed by a 100meg fiber connection
  that cost $500/month. We spent $8000 on the Ligo radio, so it paid for
  itself in 16 months. I think that is pretty useful!
 
  Matt Larsen
  vistabeam.com
 
  On 7/27/2011 8:20 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
  I was just kind of thinking what use there would be for a 100 mbps
  radio in 24 Ghz. Limitation of just a couple of miles like 60 Ghz,
  too. Unless the two other ethernet ports can be used to aggregate
  more bandwidth?
 
  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373
 
 
  On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Bob Moldashel lakel...@gbcx.net
  mailto:lakel...@gbcx.net wrote:
 
  Maybe it is. I am only going by word of mouth on that. That's
  why I said I am told.. Don't want to put my foot in my mouth...
 
  :-)
 
 
 
 
  On 7/27/2011 10:11 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
 
  That's weird, FCC regulations specify cross Pol... I think this
  radio is for Licensed 24 ?
 
  Gino A. Villarini
 
  g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
 
  Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 
  787.273.4143 tel:787.273.4143

 
  *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org
  mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
  [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Bob Moldashel
  *Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
  *To:* wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

  *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
 
  Two more things...
 
  Radio has built in spectrum analyzer that works :-)
 
  And I am told link is plane polarity so only uses one
  polarity plane for data...Not two.
 
  -B-
 
 
 
  On 7/27/2011 10:03 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 
  What kind of dishes can you use in 24ghz? What ranges can you do
  with them?
 
  On Jul 27, 2011 9:56 PM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
  mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
   Nice! Price?
  
   Gino A. Villarini
   g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
   Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
   787.273.4143 tel:787.273.4143

  
   -Original Message-
   From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
  mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
  [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
  mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
   Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
   To: WISPA General List
   Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
  
   No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec sheet attached
  
  
   -B-
  
  
  
  
   On 7/27/2011 9:44 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
   IIRC the Exalt unit is for Licensed Fiber Tower Freqs? No?
  
   Gino A. Villarini
   g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
   Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
   787.273.4143 tel:787.273.4143

  
   -Original Message-
   From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
  mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
  [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
  mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
   On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
   Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:50 PM
   To: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

   Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
  
   The Snaplink only does about 22 Mbps.
  
   Exalt just came out with a 24 Ghz. Full Duplex TDD radio that
  will do
   100 Mbps and is capable of 3 non-overlapping channels. The
  price is the same or cheaper.
  
   I believe its 2 year warranty also.
  
   -B-
  
  
  
  
  
  
   On 7/27/2011 7:23 PM, Adam Greene wrote:
   Has anyone tried the SnapLink Blast?
  
  http://www.wisptech.com/index.php/Microwave_Backhaul_Comparison_Chart
   shows 24GHz, 160M half-duplex, $6k ... if it really works,
  that's
   pretty good, in my book
  
   On 7/26/2011 10:47 AM, Adam Greene wrote:
   This question has probably been asked on this list before
  ... if
   needed, just tell me to check the archives ...
  
   Becoming 

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?

2011-07-28 Thread Gino Villarini
What antena size you have?

Sent from my Motorola Startac...


On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:27 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists 
li...@manageisp.commailto:li...@manageisp.com wrote:

I have had one of the Ligowave (SAF) 24ghz 100meg radios in service for almost 
two years on a three mile link.   It has been an outstanding piece of equipment 
in the time that we have had it.A few months ago, after a discussion on 
list, we figured out that we did not have the cross-polarization set up 
correctly, so we fixed it and saw our throughput go from 60meg to 100meg full 
duplex along with another 15db of fade margin.We have had some occasional 
rain fade, but no outages lasted more than five minutes.  I do wish that there 
was an option for a bigger dish, as being able to go 6-8 miles would be very 
handy.

The link that we have it on used to be fed by a 100meg fiber connection that 
cost $500/month.   We spent $8000 on the Ligo radio, so it paid for itself in 
16 months.  I think that is pretty useful!

Matt Larsen
vistabeam.comhttp://vistabeam.com

On 7/27/2011 8:20 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
I was just kind of thinking what use there would be for a 100 mbps radio in 24 
Ghz.  Limitation of just a couple of miles like 60 Ghz, too.  Unless the two 
other ethernet ports can be used to aggregate more bandwidth?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Bob Moldashel 
mailto:lakel...@gbcx.netlakel...@gbcx.netmailto:lakel...@gbcx.net wrote:
Maybe it is.  I am only going by word of mouth on that.  That's why I said I 
am told..   Don't want to put my foot in my mouth...

:-)




On 7/27/2011 10:11 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
That’s weird, FCC regulations specify cross Pol… I think this radio is for 
Licensed  24 ?

Gino A. Villarini
mailto:g...@aeronetpr.comg...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143tel:787.273.4143
From: mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
To: mailto:wireless@wispa.org wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?

Two more things...

Radio has built in spectrum analyzer that works  :-)

And I am told link is plane polarity so only uses one polarity plane for 
data...Not two.

-B-



On 7/27/2011 10:03 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

What kind of dishes can you use in 24ghz?  What ranges can you do with them?
On Jul 27, 2011 9:56 PM, Gino Villarini 
mailto:g...@aeronetpr.comg...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com 
wrote:
 Nice! Price?

 Gino A. Villarini
 mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 787.273.4143tel:787.273.4143

 -Original Message-
 From: mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
 wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
 [mailto:mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgwireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
  On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
 Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?

 No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec sheet attached


 -B-




 On 7/27/2011 9:44 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
 IIRC the Exalt unit is for Licensed Fiber Tower Freqs? No?

 Gino A. Villarini
 mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 787.273.4143tel:787.273.4143

 -Original Message-
 From: mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
 wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
 [mailto:mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgwireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
 Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:50 PM
 To: mailto:wireless@wispa.org wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?

 The Snaplink only does about 22 Mbps.

 Exalt just came out with a 24 Ghz. Full Duplex TDD radio that will do
 100 Mbps and is capable of 3 non-overlapping channels. The price is the same 
 or cheaper.

 I believe its 2 year warranty also.

 -B-






 On 7/27/2011 7:23 PM, Adam Greene wrote:
 Has anyone tried the SnapLink Blast?
 http://www.wisptech.com/index.php/Microwave_Backhaul_Comparison_Chart 
 http://www.wisptech.com/index.php/Microwave_Backhaul_Comparison_Chart
 shows 24GHz, 160M half-duplex, $6k ... if it really works, that's
 pretty good, in my book

 On 7/26/2011 10:47 AM, Adam Greene wrote:
 This question has probably been asked on this list before ... if
 needed, just tell me to check the archives ...

 Becoming increasingly frustrated with chasing apparent interference
 issues on our Alvarion Mikrotik 2.4GHz and 5.4 - 5.8GHz point to point
 links, I am wondering if anyone has a suggestion for a
 non-2.4GHz/5.8GHz 

Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?

2011-07-28 Thread Me

2' dishes

Matt Larsen

Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless

-Original message-
From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 28, 2011 13:10:27 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

2011-07-28 Thread Gino Villarini
Anyone have a way of having Router Redundancy with /30 ip address... all 
methods that I have researched (VRRP,HSRP) call for various IP addresses and 
are suitable for /26 or larger IP blocks... How could I have a Router Backup 
with multiple /30 ip addresses facing our customers?

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

2011-07-28 Thread Dennis Burgess
VRRP J 

 

---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer 
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
http://www.linktechs.net/ 
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/
- Author of Learn RouterOS http://routerosbook.com/ 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:36 PM
To: motor...@afmug.com; WISPA General List(wireless@wispa.org)
Subject: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

 

Anyone have a way of having Router Redundancy with /30 ip address... all
methods that I have researched (VRRP,HSRP) call for various IP addresses
and are suitable for /26 or larger IP blocks... How could I have a
Router Backup with multiple /30 ip addresses facing our customers?

 

Gino A. Villarini

g...@aeronetpr.com

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

787.273.4143




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

2011-07-28 Thread Josh Luthman
Pretty when I used VRRP it was a /30, could be wrong.  Used 2.8 RouterOS.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.netwrote:

 VRRP J 

 ** **

 *---
 **Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer**
 **Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
 Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
 *LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/ -
 Author of Learn RouterOS http://routerosbook.com/*

 ** **

 *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
 Behalf Of *Gino Villarini
 *Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:36 PM
 *To:* motor...@afmug.com; WISPA General List(wireless@wispa.org)
 *Subject:* [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

 ** **

 Anyone have a way of having Router Redundancy with /30 ip address… all
 methods that I have researched (VRRP,HSRP) call for various IP addresses and
 are suitable for /26 or larger IP blocks… How could I have a Router Backup
 with multiple /30 ip addresses facing our customers?

 ** **

 Gino A. Villarini

 g...@aeronetpr.com

 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

 787.273.4143




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

2011-07-28 Thread David Sovereen
Hi Gino,

 

It can be done.  It isn't well-documented, however.

 

On Mikrotik, for example, you put a management IP address on each router's
ethernet interface, used for speaking vrrp only, and then put the IP
address(es) that deal with customers on the vrrp subinterface.  For example:

 

rtr-1

ether1 assigned 172.16.1.1/30 (management IP used to negotiate vrrp only)

  vrrp1 = master

   24.5.20.17/30 - 24.5.20.18/30 = cust-rtr-1

   24.5.21.1/30 - 24.5.21.1/30 = cust-rtr-2

   etc


rtr-2

ether1 assigned 172.16.1.2/30 (management IP used to negotiate vrrp only)

  vrrp1 = backup, configure same IP addresses as found on rtr-1's vrrp1
interface

 

In this configuration, the two rtr's use 172.16.1.0/30 to negotiate vrrp
master/backup only.

 

While rtr-1 is up, only the vrrp1 interface on rtr-1 is active and the /30s
that are assigned between you and your customers are active only on rtr-1's
vrrp1 interface.  The vrrp1 interface on rtr-2 is not active, and the IP
addresses configured there aren't doing anything.  If rtr-1 fails, then the
vrrp1 interface configured on rtr-2 becomes active and rtr-2 begins
responding to the IP addresses that were previously being responded to on
rtr-1's vrrp interface.  You do need to configure the same IPs on both
router's vrrp1 interfaces.

 

I use this as my preferred setup on Mikrotiks, as the documented way of
having traffic go out the ether1 interface and in the vrrp1 interface can
make firewall configs and troubleshooting unnecessarily complicated.  In
this way, all traffic goes through the vrrp1 interfaces and the ether1
interfaces are used exclusively for management/vrrp traffic.

 

Hope this helps,


Dave

 

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:36 PM
To: motor...@afmug.com; WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org)
Subject: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

 

Anyone have a way of having Router Redundancy with /30 ip address. all
methods that I have researched (VRRP,HSRP) call for various IP addresses and
are suitable for /26 or larger IP blocks. How could I have a Router Backup
with multiple /30 ip addresses facing our customers?

 

Gino A. Villarini

g...@aeronetpr.com

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

787.273.4143




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

2011-07-28 Thread Sam Tetherow

It's been a while since I have done anything with VRRP...

Is the issue that you don't have a 3rd IP for the real interface on the 
second router?  If so add a private network (/29 or better) so you can 
assign 3 IPs and then use that for the VRRP IPs.  Use a script to handle 
switching the actual /30 IPs when vrrp1 goes down.



On 7/28/11 2:36 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:


Anyone have a way of having Router Redundancy with /30 ip address... 
all methods that I have researched (VRRP,HSRP) call for various IP 
addresses and are suitable for /26 or larger IP blocks... How could I 
have a Router Backup with multiple /30 ip addresses facing our customers?


Gino A. Villarini

g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

787.273.4143





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

2011-07-28 Thread Sam Tetherow

A much better explanation of what I was getting at...

On 7/28/11 2:58 PM, David Sovereen wrote:


Hi Gino,

It can be done.  It isn't well-documented, however.

On Mikrotik, for example, you put a management IP address on each 
router's ethernet interface, used for speaking vrrp only, and then put 
the IP address(es) that deal with customers on the vrrp subinterface.  
For example:


rtr-1

ether1 assigned 172.16.1.1/30 (management IP used to negotiate vrrp only)

  vrrp1 = master

   24.5.20.17/30 - 24.5.20.18/30 = cust-rtr-1

   24.5.21.1/30 - 24.5.21.1/30 = cust-rtr-2

   etc


rtr-2

ether1 assigned 172.16.1.2/30 (management IP used to negotiate vrrp only)

  vrrp1 = backup, configure same IP addresses as found on rtr-1's 
vrrp1 interface


In this configuration, the two rtr's use 172.16.1.0/30 to negotiate 
vrrp master/backup only.


While rtr-1 is up, only the vrrp1 interface on rtr-1 is active and the 
/30s that are assigned between you and your customers are active only 
on rtr-1's vrrp1 interface.  The vrrp1 interface on rtr-2 is not 
active, and the IP addresses configured there aren't doing anything.  
If rtr-1 fails, then the vrrp1 interface configured on rtr-2 becomes 
active and rtr-2 begins responding to the IP addresses that were 
previously being responded to on rtr-1's vrrp interface.  You do need 
to configure the same IPs on both router's vrrp1 interfaces.


I use this as my preferred setup on Mikrotiks, as the documented way 
of having traffic go out the ether1 interface and in the vrrp1 
interface can make firewall configs and troubleshooting unnecessarily 
complicated.  In this way, all traffic goes through the vrrp1 
interfaces and the ether1 interfaces are used exclusively for 
management/vrrp traffic.


Hope this helps,


Dave

*From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
*On Behalf Of *Gino Villarini

*Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:36 PM
*To:* motor...@afmug.com; WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org)
*Subject:* [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

Anyone have a way of having Router Redundancy with /30 ip address... 
all methods that I have researched (VRRP,HSRP) call for various IP 
addresses and are suitable for /26 or larger IP blocks... How could I 
have a Router Backup with multiple /30 ip addresses facing our customers?


Gino A. Villarini

g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

787.273.4143





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

2011-07-28 Thread Gino Villarini
Vrrp requires 3 ips... on the Provider Side

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

Pretty when I used VRRP it was a /30, could be wrong.  Used 2.8 RouterOS.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Dennis Burgess 
dmburg...@linktechs.netmailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote:
VRRP :)

---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270tel:314-735-0270 Website: 
http://www.linktechs.nethttp://www.linktechs.net/
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Traininghttp://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/ - Author 
of Learn RouterOShttp://routerosbook.com/

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:36 PM
To: motor...@afmug.commailto:motor...@afmug.com; WISPA General 
List(wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org)
Subject: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

Anyone have a way of having Router Redundancy with /30 ip address... all 
methods that I have researched (VRRP,HSRP) call for various IP addresses and 
are suitable for /26 or larger IP blocks... How could I have a Router Backup 
with multiple /30 ip addresses facing our customers?

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143tel:787.273.4143




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

2011-07-28 Thread Kristian Hoffmann
+1

The IP addresses used for VRRP don't have to be the ones involved in
routing (i.e. the highly available one(s)).  We've used the same config
you outline.  Thanks for taking the time to describe it.

-Kristian

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:58 -0400, David Sovereen wrote:
 Hi Gino,
 
  
 
 It can be done.  It isn't well-documented, however.
 
  
 
 On Mikrotik, for example, you put a management IP address on each
 router's ethernet interface, used for speaking vrrp only, and then put
 the IP address(es) that deal with customers on the vrrp subinterface.
 For example:
 
  
 
 rtr-1
 
 ether1 assigned 172.16.1.1/30 (management IP used to negotiate vrrp
 only)
 
   vrrp1 = master
 
24.5.20.17/30 - 24.5.20.18/30 = cust-rtr-1
 
24.5.21.1/30 - 24.5.21.1/30 = cust-rtr-2
 
etc
 
 
 rtr-2
 
 ether1 assigned 172.16.1.2/30 (management IP used to negotiate vrrp
 only)
 
   vrrp1 = backup, configure same IP addresses as found on rtr-1's
 vrrp1 interface
 
  
 
 In this configuration, the two rtr's use 172.16.1.0/30 to negotiate
 vrrp master/backup only.
 
  
 
 While rtr-1 is up, only the vrrp1 interface on rtr-1 is active and
 the /30s that are assigned between you and your customers are active
 only on rtr-1's vrrp1 interface.  The vrrp1 interface on rtr-2 is not
 active, and the IP addresses configured there aren't doing anything.
 If rtr-1 fails, then the vrrp1 interface configured on rtr-2 becomes
 active and rtr-2 begins responding to the IP addresses that were
 previously being responded to on rtr-1's vrrp interface.  You do need
 to configure the same IPs on both router's vrrp1 interfaces.
 
  
 
 I use this as my preferred setup on Mikrotiks, as the documented way
 of having traffic go out the ether1 interface and in the vrrp1
 interface can make firewall configs and troubleshooting unnecessarily
 complicated.  In this way, all traffic goes through the vrrp1
 interfaces and the ether1 interfaces are used exclusively for
 management/vrrp traffic.
 
  
 
 Hope this helps,
 
 
 Dave
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
 Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:36 PM
 To: motor...@afmug.com; WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org)
 Subject: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address
 
 
  
 
 Anyone have a way of having Router Redundancy with /30 ip address… all
 methods that I have researched (VRRP,HSRP) call for various IP
 addresses and are suitable for /26 or larger IP blocks… How could I
 have a Router Backup with multiple /30 ip addresses facing our
 customers?
 
  
 
 Gino A. Villarini
 
 g...@aeronetpr.com
 
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 
 787.273.4143
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

2011-07-28 Thread Josh Luthman
You can just use bs private IPs right?
On Jul 28, 2011 6:43 PM, Kristian Hoffmann kh...@fire2wire.com wrote:
 +1

 The IP addresses used for VRRP don't have to be the ones involved in
 routing (i.e. the highly available one(s)). We've used the same config
 you outline. Thanks for taking the time to describe it.

 -Kristian

 On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:58 -0400, David Sovereen wrote:
 Hi Gino,



 It can be done. It isn't well-documented, however.



 On Mikrotik, for example, you put a management IP address on each
 router's ethernet interface, used for speaking vrrp only, and then put
 the IP address(es) that deal with customers on the vrrp subinterface.
 For example:



 rtr-1

 ether1 assigned 172.16.1.1/30 (management IP used to negotiate vrrp
 only)

 vrrp1 = master

 24.5.20.17/30 - 24.5.20.18/30 = cust-rtr-1

 24.5.21.1/30 - 24.5.21.1/30 = cust-rtr-2

 etc


 rtr-2

 ether1 assigned 172.16.1.2/30 (management IP used to negotiate vrrp
 only)

 vrrp1 = backup, configure same IP addresses as found on rtr-1's
 vrrp1 interface



 In this configuration, the two rtr's use 172.16.1.0/30 to negotiate
 vrrp master/backup only.



 While rtr-1 is up, only the vrrp1 interface on rtr-1 is active and
 the /30s that are assigned between you and your customers are active
 only on rtr-1's vrrp1 interface. The vrrp1 interface on rtr-2 is not
 active, and the IP addresses configured there aren't doing anything.
 If rtr-1 fails, then the vrrp1 interface configured on rtr-2 becomes
 active and rtr-2 begins responding to the IP addresses that were
 previously being responded to on rtr-1's vrrp interface. You do need
 to configure the same IPs on both router's vrrp1 interfaces.



 I use this as my preferred setup on Mikrotiks, as the documented way
 of having traffic go out the ether1 interface and in the vrrp1
 interface can make firewall configs and troubleshooting unnecessarily
 complicated. In this way, all traffic goes through the vrrp1
 interfaces and the ether1 interfaces are used exclusively for
 management/vrrp traffic.



 Hope this helps,


 Dave









 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
 Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:36 PM
 To: motor...@afmug.com; WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org)
 Subject: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address




 Anyone have a way of having Router Redundancy with /30 ip address… all
 methods that I have researched (VRRP,HSRP) call for various IP
 addresses and are suitable for /26 or larger IP blocks… How could I
 have a Router Backup with multiple /30 ip addresses facing our
 customers?



 Gino A. Villarini

 g...@aeronetpr.com

 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

 787.273.4143





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

2011-07-28 Thread Kristian Hoffmann
Yes.  Say you want redundancy between two routers connecting to a single
upstream that provides you a single /30.  You connect all three to the
same switch/VLAN, assign private addresses for VRRP to the
provider-facing interfaces, and assign your single public /30 address to
the VRRP interface.  If the primary router fails, the backup router's
VRRP interface will become active, as will the address, and traffic will
commence to the backup router.  On your network facing side, you'll need
to have OSPF or something else setup to advertise a default route (or
whatever is appropriate), but using the
distribute-default=if-installed-as-... option, lest the backup/inactive
router advertise the default route as well.

-Kristian

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 18:54 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
 You can just use bs private IPs right?
 
 On Jul 28, 2011 6:43 PM, Kristian Hoffmann kh...@fire2wire.com
 wrote:
  +1
  
  The IP addresses used for VRRP don't have to be the ones involved in
  routing (i.e. the highly available one(s)). We've used the same
 config
  you outline. Thanks for taking the time to describe it.
  
  -Kristian
  
  On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:58 -0400, David Sovereen wrote:
  Hi Gino,
  
  
  
  It can be done. It isn't well-documented, however.
  
  
  
  On Mikrotik, for example, you put a management IP address on each
  router's ethernet interface, used for speaking vrrp only, and then
 put
  the IP address(es) that deal with customers on the vrrp
 subinterface.
  For example:
  
  
  
  rtr-1
  
  ether1 assigned 172.16.1.1/30 (management IP used to negotiate vrrp
  only)
  
  vrrp1 = master
  
  24.5.20.17/30 - 24.5.20.18/30 = cust-rtr-1
  
  24.5.21.1/30 - 24.5.21.1/30 = cust-rtr-2
  
  etc
  
  
  rtr-2
  
  ether1 assigned 172.16.1.2/30 (management IP used to negotiate vrrp
  only)
  
  vrrp1 = backup, configure same IP addresses as found on rtr-1's
  vrrp1 interface
  
  
  
  In this configuration, the two rtr's use 172.16.1.0/30 to negotiate
  vrrp master/backup only.
  
  
  
  While rtr-1 is up, only the vrrp1 interface on rtr-1 is active and
  the /30s that are assigned between you and your customers are
 active
  only on rtr-1's vrrp1 interface. The vrrp1 interface on rtr-2 is
 not
  active, and the IP addresses configured there aren't doing
 anything.
  If rtr-1 fails, then the vrrp1 interface configured on rtr-2
 becomes
  active and rtr-2 begins responding to the IP addresses that were
  previously being responded to on rtr-1's vrrp interface. You do
 need
  to configure the same IPs on both router's vrrp1 interfaces.
  
  
  
  I use this as my preferred setup on Mikrotiks, as the documented
 way
  of having traffic go out the ether1 interface and in the vrrp1
  interface can make firewall configs and troubleshooting
 unnecessarily
  complicated. In this way, all traffic goes through the vrrp1
  interfaces and the ether1 interfaces are used exclusively for
  management/vrrp traffic.
  
  
  
  Hope this helps,
  
  
  Dave
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
  On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
  Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:36 PM
  To: motor...@afmug.com; WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org)
  Subject: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address
  
  
  
  
  Anyone have a way of having Router Redundancy with /30 ip address…
 all
  methods that I have researched (VRRP,HSRP) call for various IP
  addresses and are suitable for /26 or larger IP blocks… How could I
  have a Router Backup with multiple /30 ip addresses facing our
  customers?
  
  
  
  Gino A. Villarini
  
  g...@aeronetpr.com
  
  Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
  
  787.273.4143
  
  
  
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
  
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
  
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
  
  
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
  
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
  
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




Re: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

2011-07-28 Thread Gino Villarini
Thanks all! What if the ip addresses are configured on vlans?

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Kristian Hoffmann
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 6:43 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address

+1

The IP addresses used for VRRP don't have to be the ones involved in routing 
(i.e. the highly available one(s)).  We've used the same config you outline.  
Thanks for taking the time to describe it.

-Kristian

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:58 -0400, David Sovereen wrote:
 Hi Gino,
 
  
 
 It can be done.  It isn't well-documented, however.
 
  
 
 On Mikrotik, for example, you put a management IP address on each 
 router's ethernet interface, used for speaking vrrp only, and then put 
 the IP address(es) that deal with customers on the vrrp subinterface.
 For example:
 
  
 
 rtr-1
 
 ether1 assigned 172.16.1.1/30 (management IP used to negotiate vrrp
 only)
 
   vrrp1 = master
 
24.5.20.17/30 - 24.5.20.18/30 = cust-rtr-1
 
24.5.21.1/30 - 24.5.21.1/30 = cust-rtr-2
 
etc
 
 
 rtr-2
 
 ether1 assigned 172.16.1.2/30 (management IP used to negotiate vrrp
 only)
 
   vrrp1 = backup, configure same IP addresses as found on rtr-1's
 vrrp1 interface
 
  
 
 In this configuration, the two rtr's use 172.16.1.0/30 to negotiate 
 vrrp master/backup only.
 
  
 
 While rtr-1 is up, only the vrrp1 interface on rtr-1 is active and the 
 /30s that are assigned between you and your customers are active only 
 on rtr-1's vrrp1 interface.  The vrrp1 interface on rtr-2 is not 
 active, and the IP addresses configured there aren't doing anything.
 If rtr-1 fails, then the vrrp1 interface configured on rtr-2 becomes 
 active and rtr-2 begins responding to the IP addresses that were 
 previously being responded to on rtr-1's vrrp interface.  You do need 
 to configure the same IPs on both router's vrrp1 interfaces.
 
  
 
 I use this as my preferred setup on Mikrotiks, as the documented way 
 of having traffic go out the ether1 interface and in the vrrp1 
 interface can make firewall configs and troubleshooting unnecessarily 
 complicated.  In this way, all traffic goes through the vrrp1 
 interfaces and the ether1 interfaces are used exclusively for 
 management/vrrp traffic.
 
  
 
 Hope this helps,
 
 
 Dave
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
 Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:36 PM
 To: motor...@afmug.com; WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org)
 Subject: [WISPA] Router Redundancy and /30 Ip address
 
 
  
 
 Anyone have a way of having Router Redundancy with /30 ip address… all 
 methods that I have researched (VRRP,HSRP) call for various IP 
 addresses and are suitable for /26 or larger IP blocks… How could I 
 have a Router Backup with multiple /30 ip addresses facing our 
 customers?
 
  
 
 Gino A. Villarini
 
 g...@aeronetpr.com
 
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 
 787.273.4143
 
 
 
 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/