Re: [WISPA] W9 Needed

[RickG]

I filled out the form, now what? J/K LOL!

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:35 PM, William C Bardwell 
wrote:

> I think this is a scam or wrong email address.
>
> On Dec 15, 2017 8:25 PM, "Matt Hoppes" 
> wrote:
>
>> Have I done business with you?
>>
>> On Dec 15, 2017, at 20:36, Josh Luthman 
>> wrote:
>>
>> To who??
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Dec 15, 2017 8:29 PM, "Alan Belvo"  wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings, We need a W-9 completed for our payments to you.  Please let
>>> me know if you have any questions.
>>>
>>>
>>> You can use our bookkeeper's secure online form at
>>> https://www.singletrackbookkeeping.com/w9/
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> *Alan Belvo*
>>> *ZIRKEL Wireless *
>>>
>>> *Internet for Northwest Colorado*970-871-8500 x101 <(970)%20871-8500>
>>>  office
>>> 970-846-8060 <(970)%20846-8060>  mobile
>>> 866-903-4628 <(866)%20903-4628>  fax
>>> www.zirkelwireless.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>


-- 
-RickG
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] W9 Needed

[William C Bardwell]

I think this is a scam or wrong email address.

On Dec 15, 2017 8:25 PM, "Matt Hoppes" 
wrote:

> Have I done business with you?
>
> On Dec 15, 2017, at 20:36, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:
>
> To who??
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Dec 15, 2017 8:29 PM, "Alan Belvo"  wrote:
>
>> Greetings, We need a W-9 completed for our payments to you.  Please let
>> me know if you have any questions.
>>
>>
>> You can use our bookkeeper's secure online form at
>> https://www.singletrackbookkeeping.com/w9/
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> *Alan Belvo*
>> *ZIRKEL Wireless *
>>
>> *Internet for Northwest Colorado*970-871-8500 x101 <(970)%20871-8500>
>>  office
>> 970-846-8060 <(970)%20846-8060>  mobile
>> 866-903-4628 <(866)%20903-4628>  fax
>> www.zirkelwireless.com
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] W9 Needed

[Matt Hoppes]

Have I done business with you?

> On Dec 15, 2017, at 20:36, Josh Luthman  wrote:
> 
> To who??
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
>> On Dec 15, 2017 8:29 PM, "Alan Belvo"  wrote:
>> Greetings, We need a W-9 completed for our payments to you.  Please let me 
>> know if you have any questions.
>> 
>> 
>> You can use our bookkeeper's secure online form at 
>> https://www.singletrackbookkeeping.com/w9/
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Alan Belvo
>> ZIRKEL Wireless 
>> Internet for Northwest Colorado
>> 970-871-8500 x101  office
>> 970-846-8060  mobile
>> 866-903-4628  fax
>> www.zirkelwireless.com
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> 
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Network Neutrality talking points

[Sean Heskett]

Yes but do you prioritize vonage over ooma??? 

-Sean

[Sent from mobile]

> On Dec 15, 2017, at 6:33 PM, James Wilson  wrote:
> 
> Don't we prioritize VoIP?
> 
>> On Dec 15, 2017 4:04 PM, "Josh Luthman"  wrote:
>> This is fantastic.
>> 
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> 
>>> On Dec 15, 2017 3:53 PM, "Mark Radabaugh"  wrote:
>>> For your use, re-posted from last week:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Talking Points for WISPA Members on “Net Neutrality” and “Internet Freedom”
>>> 
>>> December 2017
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Overview for WISPA Members
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> ·   These talking points are not intended to be used proactively. WISPA 
>>> is not taking a proactive role in advocacy on this issue, and we do not 
>>> recommend that you do.
>>> 
>>> ·   The intent is to help you be prepared for media and public 
>>> inquiries if they do come in.
>>> 
>>> ·   If you receive a query about your company’s position on net 
>>> neutrality, or WISPA’s position, we encourage you to refer it to us to 
>>> handle. Please send it to:
>>> 
>>> o   Dale Curtis, WISPA Communications Support, 
>>> d...@dalecurtiscommunications.com
>>> 
>>> ·   If you do choose to answer a media or public query:
>>> 
>>> o   Please let us know, preferably in advance; and
>>> 
>>> o   Please stick to this script; going off script could create problems for 
>>> you and your business.  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> General Tips
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> ·   Any statements you make must be 100% truthful and backed-up with 
>>> facts; so please don’t say anything that is untrue or unsupportable with 
>>> facts.
>>> 
>>> ·   If you don’t know the answer to a question, just say so. A 
>>> convenient way to say it is: “I don’t know about that, but what I do know 
>>> is …”   
>>> 
>>> ·   Don’t bring up other issues.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Talking Points
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> ·   Let’s be clear: We support a free and open internet. 
>>> 
>>> o   We don’t block, throttle, or prioritize any content.
>>> 
>>> o   We disclose our terms of service in plain English.  
>>> 
>>> o   We support robust privacy protections for our customers. 
>>> 
>>> o   Those are the core elements of “net neutrality,” and we support them. 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> ·   We believe you can have a free and open internet without 
>>> heavy-handed regulation and enforcement that is ill-suited for small 
>>> providers.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> ·   What was wrong with the way the internet was regulated up until two 
>>> years ago? It worked well then, and it will again.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> ·   FCC regulations designed to treat all internet providers like large 
>>> monopoly utilities – with open-ended and vaguely worded requirements, all 
>>> subject to bureaucratic whim – are taking resources away from investment in 
>>> under-served areas and diverting them instead toward lawyers and 
>>> compliance consultants.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> ·   When our compliance costs go up because of government action, we 
>>> either have to reduce investment in our business or pass those costs on to 
>>> our customers.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> 
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] W9 Needed

[Josh Luthman]

To who??

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Dec 15, 2017 8:29 PM, "Alan Belvo"  wrote:

> Greetings, We need a W-9 completed for our payments to you.  Please let me
> know if you have any questions.
>
>
> You can use our bookkeeper's secure online form at https://www.
> singletrackbookkeeping.com/w9/
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> *Alan Belvo*
> *ZIRKEL Wireless *
>
> *Internet for Northwest Colorado*970-871-8500 x101 <(970)%20871-8500>
>  office
> 970-846-8060 <(970)%20846-8060>  mobile
> 866-903-4628 <(866)%20903-4628>  fax
> www.zirkelwireless.com
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Network Neutrality talking points

[James Wilson]

Don't we prioritize VoIP?

On Dec 15, 2017 4:04 PM, "Josh Luthman"  wrote:

> This is fantastic.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Dec 15, 2017 3:53 PM, "Mark Radabaugh"  wrote:
>
>> For your use, re-posted from last week:
>>
>>
>> *Talking Points for WISPA Members on “Net Neutrality” and “Internet
>> Freedom” *
>>
>> December 2017
>>
>>
>>
>> *Overview for WISPA Members *
>>
>>
>>
>> ·   These talking points are *not* intended to be used proactively.
>> WISPA is not taking a proactive role in advocacy on this issue, and we
>> do not recommend that you do.
>>
>> ·   The intent is to help you be prepared for media and public
>> inquiries if they do come in.
>>
>> ·   If you receive a query about your company’s position on net
>> neutrality, or WISPA’s position, we encourage you to refer it to us to
>> handle. Please send it to:
>>
>> o   Dale Curtis, WISPA Communications Support,
>> d...@dalecurtiscommunications.com
>>
>> ·   If you do choose to answer a media or public query:
>>
>> o   Please let us know, preferably in advance; and
>>
>> o   Please stick to this script; going off script could create problems
>> for you and your business.
>>
>>
>>
>> *General Tips *
>>
>>
>>
>> ·   Any statements you make must be 100% truthful and backed-up with
>> facts; so please don’t say anything that is untrue or unsupportable with
>> facts.
>>
>> ·   If you don’t know the answer to a question, just say so. A
>> convenient way to say it is: “I don’t know about *that*, but what I do
>> know is …”
>>
>> ·   Don’t bring up other issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Talking Points *
>>
>>
>>
>> ·   *Let’s be clear: We support a free and open internet. *
>>
>> o   We don’t block, throttle, or prioritize any content.
>>
>> o   We disclose our terms of service in plain English.
>>
>> o   We support robust privacy protections for our customers.
>>
>> o   Those are the core elements of “net neutrality,” and we support them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ·   *We believe you can have a free and open internet without
>> heavy-handed regulation and enforcement that is ill-suited for small
>> providers. *
>>
>>
>>
>> ·   What was wrong with the way the internet was regulated up until
>> two years ago? It worked well then, and it will again.
>>
>>
>>
>> ·   FCC regulations designed to treat all internet providers like
>> large monopoly utilities – with open-ended and vaguely worded requirements,
>> all subject to bureaucratic whim – are taking resources away from
>> investment in under-served areas and diverting them instead toward lawyers
>> and compliance consultants.
>>
>>
>>
>> ·   When our compliance costs go up because of government action, we
>> either have to reduce investment in our business or pass those costs on to
>> our customers.
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] W9 Needed

[Alan Belvo]

Greetings, We need a W-9 completed for our payments to you.  Please let me
know if you have any questions.


You can use our bookkeeper's secure online form at
https://www.singletrackbookkeeping.com/w9/


Thank you,

*Alan Belvo*
*ZIRKEL Wireless *

*Internet for Northwest Colorado*970-871-8500 x101  office
970-846-8060  mobile
866-903-4628  fax
www.zirkelwireless.com
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Network Neutrality talking points

[Josh Luthman]

This is fantastic.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Dec 15, 2017 3:53 PM, "Mark Radabaugh"  wrote:

> For your use, re-posted from last week:
>
>
> *Talking Points for WISPA Members on “Net Neutrality” and “Internet
> Freedom” *
>
> December 2017
>
>
>
> *Overview for WISPA Members *
>
>
>
> ·   These talking points are *not* intended to be used proactively.
> WISPA is not taking a proactive role in advocacy on this issue, and we do
> not recommend that you do.
>
> ·   The intent is to help you be prepared for media and public
> inquiries if they do come in.
>
> ·   If you receive a query about your company’s position on net
> neutrality, or WISPA’s position, we encourage you to refer it to us to
> handle. Please send it to:
>
> o   Dale Curtis, WISPA Communications Support,
> d...@dalecurtiscommunications.com
>
> ·   If you do choose to answer a media or public query:
>
> o   Please let us know, preferably in advance; and
>
> o   Please stick to this script; going off script could create problems
> for you and your business.
>
>
>
> *General Tips *
>
>
>
> ·   Any statements you make must be 100% truthful and backed-up with
> facts; so please don’t say anything that is untrue or unsupportable with
> facts.
>
> ·   If you don’t know the answer to a question, just say so. A
> convenient way to say it is: “I don’t know about *that*, but what I do
> know is …”
>
> ·   Don’t bring up other issues.
>
>
>
> *Talking Points *
>
>
>
> ·   *Let’s be clear: We support a free and open internet. *
>
> o   We don’t block, throttle, or prioritize any content.
>
> o   We disclose our terms of service in plain English.
>
> o   We support robust privacy protections for our customers.
>
> o   Those are the core elements of “net neutrality,” and we support them.
>
>
>
>
> ·   *We believe you can have a free and open internet without
> heavy-handed regulation and enforcement that is ill-suited for small
> providers. *
>
>
>
> ·   What was wrong with the way the internet was regulated up until
> two years ago? It worked well then, and it will again.
>
>
>
> ·   FCC regulations designed to treat all internet providers like
> large monopoly utilities – with open-ended and vaguely worded requirements,
> all subject to bureaucratic whim – are taking resources away from
> investment in under-served areas and diverting them instead toward lawyers
> and compliance consultants.
>
>
>
> ·   When our compliance costs go up because of government action, we
> either have to reduce investment in our business or pass those costs on to
> our customers.
>
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] Network Neutrality talking points

[Mark Radabaugh]

For your use, re-posted from last week:


*Talking Points for WISPA Members on “Net Neutrality” and “Internet 
Freedom” *


December 2017

*Overview for WISPA Members *

**

·These talking points are _not_ intended to be used proactively. WISPA 
is not taking a proactive role in advocacy on this issue, and we do not 
recommend that you do.


·The intent is to help you be prepared for media and public inquiries if 
they do come in.


·If you receive a query about your company’s position on net neutrality, 
or WISPA’s position, we encourage you to refer it to us to handle. 
Please send it to:


oDale Curtis, WISPA Communications Support, 
d...@dalecurtiscommunications.com 


·If you do choose to answer a media or public query:

oPlease let us know, preferably in advance; and

oPlease stick to this script; going off script could create problems for 
you and your business.


*General Tips *

**

·Any statements you make must be 100% truthful and backed-up with facts; 
so please don’t say anything that is untrue or unsupportable with facts.


·If you don’t know the answer to a question, just say so. A convenient 
way to say it is: “I don’t know about /that/, but what I do know is …”


·Don’t bring up other issues.

**

*Talking Points *

**

·*Let’s be clear: We support a free and open internet. *

oWe don’t block, throttle, or prioritize any content.

oWe disclose our terms of service in plain English.

oWe support robust privacy protections for our customers.

oThose are the core elements of “net neutrality,” and we support them.

**

·*We believe you can have a free and open internet without heavy-handed 
regulation and enforcement that is ill-suited for small providers. *


·What was wrong with the way the internet was regulated up until two 
years ago? It worked well then, and it will again.


·FCC regulations designed to treat all internet providers like large 
monopoly utilities – with open-ended and vaguely worded requirements, 
all subject to bureaucratic whim – are taking resources away from 
investment in under-served areas and diverting them instead toward 
lawyers and compliance consultants.


·When our compliance costs go up because of government action, we either 
have to reduce investment in our business or pass those costs on to our 
customers.


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality bandwidth providers

[Darin Steffl]

Dan,

You have to understand if you're selling a residential internet package, it
is NOT dedicated. There has to be some oversubscription allowed for the ISP
to make a profit. If every sub we had used their plan 24/7 and expected the
speed to always be there and not dip down, we wouldn't make money and would
shutdown.

So yes, it is wrong and hurts an ISP if customers use and expect to max out
their connection all the time but specifically during the evening peak.
That's where it matters most.

If customers always want their bandwidth then they need to pay more to
upgrade backhaul, ap's, etc. If they're OK with slightly slower speeds
during peak but enough to still stream and not feel slow, then prices can
remain level.

Power companies issue peak time alerts during the summer and winter to
prevent brownouts or congestion in our terms. And they specifically state
in their newsletter that if people don't reduce their power demands during
their peak times, rates are going to increase as it costs more to handle
that load.

On Dec 15, 2017 12:07 PM, "Vance Shipley"  wrote:

> On Dec 15, 2017 23:29, "Dan Thompson"  wrote:
>
> How is using what you pay for abuse?  In both instances described, the
> customer is using a large chunk of their bandwidth, but not using more than
> the plan alots.
>
>
> Fallacy. Imagine your local "all you can eat" buffet  charges $10 for
> lunch which you really enjoy and find good value. One day a Sumo wrestling
> school opens next door and the new customers eat them out every hour. Next
> week lunch is $20 but you're eating the same thing.
>
> You are not paying equally when you are part of the top percentile of
> bandwidth consumers.
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Josh Luthman]

Lucky you!!!


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Seth Mattinen  wrote:

> On 12/15/17 09:40, Josh Luthman wrote:
> > Do you not have a DMCA contact?  I get these things daily and I have a
> > pretty small customer count with a geographic that I would suspect is
> > minimally using Bittorrent.
> >
>
>
> Not daily, no. Maybe once or twice a month for me.
>
> ~Seth
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Seth Mattinen]

On 12/15/17 09:40, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Do you not have a DMCA contact?  I get these things daily and I have a 
> pretty small customer count with a geographic that I would suspect is 
> minimally using Bittorrent.
> 


Not daily, no. Maybe once or twice a month for me.

~Seth
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality bandwidth providers

[Vance Shipley]

On Dec 15, 2017 23:29, "Dan Thompson"  wrote:

How is using what you pay for abuse?  In both instances described, the
customer is using a large chunk of their bandwidth, but not using more than
the plan alots.


Fallacy. Imagine your local "all you can eat" buffet  charges $10 for lunch
which you really enjoy and find good value. One day a Sumo wrestling school
opens next door and the new customers eat them out every hour. Next week
lunch is $20 but you're eating the same thing.

You are not paying equally when you are part of the top percentile of
bandwidth consumers.
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Tim Cailloux]

I talked to a reporter on Net Neutrality yesterday, and this is one of
the things I highlighted, as a scenario in which an ISP could help
customers after Title II no longer applied.  Like, "I know your Internet
stinks right now; it's your XBox updates and your Windows updates, and
that's the reason you can't stream Netflix.  I can't manage traffic
priorities during peak hours for you."
I had a customer call for support because their PS4 was uploading and
saturating their upstream.  We ended the call with all electronics in
his house in a pile in the living room to prove that it was one of his
devices and not my service.
tim
 
--
Tim Cailloux
t...@southern-internet.com
(404) 406-9911


On Fri, Dec 15, 2017, at 12:55, Vance Shipley wrote:
> Good story. This is the stuff that people don't understand. Policy
> enforcement is good for everyone, including the enforcee! Net
> neutrality, as imagined by it's staunch supporters, is a really bad
> idea. They imagine it's about "big corporate" stifling competition and
> innovation but the very real everyday impact of real "neutrality"
> would be normal people suffering poor service so the geeky few could
> pay less for their consumption and no back pressure on abuse.> 
> 
> On Dec 15, 2017 21:34, "Kris McElroy"
>  wrote:>> I would agree with Adair, Torrent is a 
> non-issue for us.  We have
>> seen more complaints from Windows Update and Xbox Live Updates
>> impacting customers connections, meaning they call in and say “I am
>> paying for 20 Meg service and when I run a speed test I am only
>> seeing 2 Meg Down or wny is my Netflix buffering”.  We go and look
>> and they will have a windows update running in the background taking
>> 18-19 Meg of their connection up and you have to explain that to
>> them, same way with Xbox accept all our gamers have our 50 Meg plan
>> and it will chew up 30 to 40 Meg downloading an update or game.
>> Luckily, we can manage this with our Procera now so we don’t hear
>> from customers as much.>> __ __


>> Kris McElroy


>> __ __


>> __ __


>> __ __


>> *From: * on behalf of Mike Hammett 
>> > il.net> *Reply-To: *WISPA General List  *Date:
>> *Friday, December 15, 2017 at 9:51 AM *To: *WISPA General List
>>  *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality &
>> bandwidth providers>> __ __


>> Fair how?


>>
>>
>> -
>>  Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions[1] mage removed by
>>  sender.mage removed by sender.mage removed by sender.mage removed by
>>  sender. Midwest Internet Exchange[2] mage removed by sender.mage
>>  removed by sender.mage removed by sender. The Brothers WISP[3] mage
>>  removed by sender.mage removed by sender.>> 
>> *From: *"Vance Shipley"  *To: *"WISPA General
>> List"  *Sent: *Friday, December 15, 2017 9:43:31
>> AM *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers>> Because 
>> it's the fair thing to do. As a neighbour I would greatly
>> appreciate it.>> __ __


>> On Dec 15, 2017 21:05, "Mike Hammett" 
>> wrote:>>> Why?


>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>>  Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions[4] mage removed by
>>>  sender.mage removed by sender.mage removed by sender.mage removed
>>>  by sender. Midwest Internet Exchange[5] mage removed by sender.mage
>>>  removed by sender.mage removed by sender. The Brothers WISP[6] mage
>>>  removed by sender.mage removed by sender.>>> 
>>> *From: *"Rory Conaway"  *To: *"WISPA General
>>> List"  *Sent: *Wednesday, December 13, 2017
>>> 11:04:43 AM *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth
>>> providers
>>>
>>>  I want to be able to throttle torrent users.  Beyond that, I don't
>>>  think it will affect us much in areas of high-competition.
>>>
>>>  Rory
>>>
>>>  -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
>>> [mailto:wireless-
>>>  boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen Sent: Tuesday,
>>>  December 12, 2017 6:57 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re:
>>>  [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>>>
>>>  On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
>>>  > What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality
>>>  > being over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how
>>>  > the cable and DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've
>>>  > been thinking this will have little impact on us and our
>>>  > customers (since we don't intend on changing our policies) but I
>>>  > may not be thinking about the bigger picture enough. Perhaps my
>>>  > bandwidth and upstream fiber providers will raise rates or charge
>>>  > premium fees for fast lanes to middle mile access.
>>>
>>>
>>>  Nothing. It wasn't mayhem in the decades before 2015 and it won't
>>>  suddenly become a problem now. The big guys are always going to try
>>>  some crap until someone 

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality bandwidth providers

[Dan Thompson]

How is using what you pay for abuse?  In both instances described, the customer 
is using a large chunk of their bandwidth, but not using more than the plan 
alots.  

 On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:55:10 -0500 van...@sigscale.com wrote 

Good story. This is the stuff that people don't understand. Policy enforcement 
is good for everyone, including the enforcee! Net neutrality, as imagined by 
it's staunch supporters, is a really bad idea. They imagine it's about "big 
corporate" stifling competition and innovation but the very real everyday 
impact of real "neutrality" would be normal people suffering poor service so 
the geeky few could pay less for their consumption and no back pressure on 
abuse.


On Dec 15, 2017 21:34, "Kris McElroy"  wrote:
I would agree with Adair, Torrent is a non-issue for us.  We have seen more 
complaints from Windows Update and Xbox Live Updates impacting customers 
connections, meaning they call in and say “I am paying for 20 Meg service and 
when I run a speed test I am only seeing 2 Meg Down or wny is my Netflix 
buffering”.  We go and look and they will have a windows update running in the 
background taking 18-19 Meg of their connection up and you have to explain that 
to them, same way with Xbox accept all our gamers have our 50 Meg plan and it 
will chew up 30 to 40 Meg downloading an update or game.  Luckily, we can 
manage this with our Procera now so we don’t hear from customers as much.

 

Kris McElroy

 

 

 

From:  on behalf of Mike Hammett 

Reply-To: WISPA General List 
Date: Friday, December 15, 2017 at 9:51 AM
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

 

Fair how?



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions

Midwest Internet Exchange

The Brothers WISP


From: "Vance Shipley" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 9:43:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

Because it's the fair thing to do. As a neighbour I would greatly appreciate it.

 

On Dec 15, 2017 21:05, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:

Why?



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions

Midwest Internet Exchange

The Brothers WISP


From: "Rory Conaway" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 11:04:43 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

I want to be able to throttle torrent users.  Beyond that, I don't think it 
will affect us much in areas of high-competition.

Rory

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
> What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being 
> over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and 
> DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've been thinking this 
> will have little impact on us and our customers (since we don't intend 
> on changing our policies) but I may not be thinking about the bigger 
> picture enough. Perhaps my bandwidth and upstream fiber providers will 
> raise rates or charge premium fees for fast lanes to middle mile access.


Nothing. It wasn't mayhem in the decades before 2015 and it won't suddenly 
become a problem now. The big guys are always going to try some crap until 
someone calls them on it, "net neutrality" or not.

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Vance Shipley]

Good story. This is the stuff that people don't understand. Policy
enforcement is good for everyone, including the enforcee! Net neutrality,
as imagined by it's staunch supporters, is a really bad idea. They imagine
it's about "big corporate" stifling competition and innovation but the very
real everyday impact of real "neutrality" would be normal people suffering
poor service so the geeky few could pay less for their consumption and no
back pressure on abuse.


On Dec 15, 2017 21:34, "Kris McElroy"  wrote:

> I would agree with Adair, Torrent is a non-issue for us.  We have seen
> more complaints from Windows Update and Xbox Live Updates impacting
> customers connections, meaning they call in and say “I am paying for 20 Meg
> service and when I run a speed test I am only seeing 2 Meg Down or wny is
> my Netflix buffering”.  We go and look and they will have a windows update
> running in the background taking 18-19 Meg of their connection up and you
> have to explain that to them, same way with Xbox accept all our gamers have
> our 50 Meg plan and it will chew up 30 to 40 Meg downloading an update or
> game.  Luckily, we can manage this with our Procera now so we don’t hear
> from customers as much.
>
>
>
> Kris McElroy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of Mike Hammett <
> wispawirel...@ics-il.net>
> *Reply-To: *WISPA General List 
> *Date: *Friday, December 15, 2017 at 9:51 AM
> *To: *WISPA General List 
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>
>
>
> Fair how?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> [image: mage removed by sender.] [image:
> mage removed by sender.]
> [image:
> mage removed by sender.]
> [image:
> mage removed by sender.] 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> [image: mage removed by sender.] [image:
> mage removed by sender.]
> [image: mage
> removed by sender.] 
> The Brothers WISP 
> [image: mage removed by sender.]
> [image: mage removed by sender.]
> 
> --
>
> *From: *"Vance Shipley" 
> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
> *Sent: *Friday, December 15, 2017 9:43:31 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>
> Because it's the fair thing to do. As a neighbour I would greatly
> appreciate it.
>
>
>
> On Dec 15, 2017 21:05, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:
>
> Why?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> [image: mage removed by sender.] [image:
> mage removed by sender.]
> [image:
> mage removed by sender.]
> [image:
> mage removed by sender.] 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> [image: mage removed by sender.] [image:
> mage removed by sender.]
> [image: mage
> removed by sender.] 
> The Brothers WISP 
> [image: mage removed by sender.]
> [image: mage removed by sender.]
> 
> --
>
> *From: *"Rory Conaway" 
> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 13, 2017 11:04:43 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>
> I want to be able to throttle torrent users.  Beyond that, I don't think
> it will affect us much in areas of high-competition.
>
> Rory
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM
> To: wireless@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>
> On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
> > What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being
> > over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and
> > DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've been thinking this
> > will have little impact on us and our customers (since we don't intend
> > on changing our policies) but I may not be thinking about the bigger
> > picture enough. Perhaps my 

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Josh Luthman]

Do you not have a DMCA contact?  I get these things daily and I have a
pretty small customer count with a geographic that I would suspect is
minimally using Bittorrent.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Seth Mattinen  wrote:

> On 12/13/17 9:04 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:
> > I want to be able to throttle torrent users.  Beyond that, I don't think
> it will affect us much in areas of high-competition.
>
>
> I don't really see torrents as a major thing anymore, not like what it
> used to be anyway.
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Seth Mattinen]

On 12/13/17 9:04 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:
> I want to be able to throttle torrent users.  Beyond that, I don't think it 
> will affect us much in areas of high-competition.


I don't really see torrents as a major thing anymore, not like what it 
used to be anyway.
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Kris McElroy]

I would agree with Adair, Torrent is a non-issue for us.  We have seen more 
complaints from Windows Update and Xbox Live Updates impacting customers 
connections, meaning they call in and say “I am paying for 20 Meg service and 
when I run a speed test I am only seeing 2 Meg Down or wny is my Netflix 
buffering”.  We go and look and they will have a windows update running in the 
background taking 18-19 Meg of their connection up and you have to explain that 
to them, same way with Xbox accept all our gamers have our 50 Meg plan and it 
will chew up 30 to 40 Meg downloading an update or game.  Luckily, we can 
manage this with our Procera now so we don’t hear from customers as much.

Kris McElroy



From:  on behalf of Mike Hammett 

Reply-To: WISPA General List 
Date: Friday, December 15, 2017 at 9:51 AM
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

Fair how?


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
[mage removed by sender.][mage removed by 
sender.][mage 
removed by 
sender.][mage 
removed by sender.]
Midwest Internet Exchange
[mage removed by sender.][mage removed by 
sender.][mage 
removed by sender.]
The Brothers WISP
[mage removed by sender.][mage 
removed by sender.]

From: "Vance Shipley" 
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 9:43:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
Because it's the fair thing to do. As a neighbour I would greatly appreciate it.

On Dec 15, 2017 21:05, "Mike Hammett" 
> wrote:
Why?


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
[mage removed by sender.][mage removed by 
sender.][mage 
removed by 
sender.][mage 
removed by sender.]
Midwest Internet Exchange
[mage removed by sender.][mage removed by 
sender.][mage 
removed by sender.]
The Brothers WISP
[mage removed by sender.][mage 
removed by sender.]

From: "Rory Conaway" >
To: "WISPA General List" >
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 11:04:43 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

I want to be able to throttle torrent users.  Beyond that, I don't think it 
will affect us much in areas of high-competition.

Rory

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
> What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being
> over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and
> DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've been thinking this
> will have little impact on us and our customers (since we don't intend
> on changing our policies) but I may not be thinking about the bigger
> picture enough. Perhaps my bandwidth and upstream fiber providers will
> raise rates or charge premium fees for fast lanes to middle mile access.


Nothing. It wasn't mayhem in the decades before 2015 and it won't suddenly 
become a problem now. The big guys are always going to try some crap until 
someone calls them on it, "net neutrality" or not.

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless 

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Mike Hammett]

Fair how? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

- Original Message -

From: "Vance Shipley"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 9:43:31 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers 


Because it's the fair thing to do. As a neighbour I would greatly appreciate 
it. 


On Dec 15, 2017 21:05, "Mike Hammett" < wispawirel...@ics-il.net > wrote: 




Why? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 



From: "Rory Conaway" < r...@triadwireless.net > 
To: "WISPA General List" < wireless@wispa.org > 
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 11:04:43 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers 

I want to be able to throttle torrent users. Beyond that, I don't think it will 
affect us much in areas of high-competition. 

Rory 

-Original Message- 
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org ] On 
Behalf Of Seth Mattinen 
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM 
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers 

On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote: 
> What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being 
> over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and 
> DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've been thinking this 
> will have little impact on us and our customers (since we don't intend 
> on changing our policies) but I may not be thinking about the bigger 
> picture enough. Perhaps my bandwidth and upstream fiber providers will 
> raise rates or charge premium fees for fast lanes to middle mile access. 


Nothing. It wasn't mayhem in the decades before 2015 and it won't suddenly 
become a problem now. The big guys are always going to try some crap until 
someone calls them on it, "net neutrality" or not. 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 


___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 




___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Adair Winter]

we see very little DMCA notices anymore. Maybe 2-4 a month. of those that
come it they seem to be from people using Kodi to "stream" and they have no
idea what is actually happening in the background.

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Damn DMCA notices!
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Dec 15, 2017 10:34 AM, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:
>
>> Why?
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The Brothers WISP 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> *From: *"Rory Conaway" 
>> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
>> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 13, 2017 11:04:43 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>>
>> I want to be able to throttle torrent users.  Beyond that, I don't think
>> it will affect us much in areas of high-competition.
>>
>> Rory
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM
>> To: wireless@wispa.org
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>>
>> On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
>> > What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being
>> > over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and
>> > DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've been thinking this
>> > will have little impact on us and our customers (since we don't intend
>> > on changing our policies) but I may not be thinking about the bigger
>> > picture enough. Perhaps my bandwidth and upstream fiber providers will
>> > raise rates or charge premium fees for fast lanes to middle mile access.
>>
>>
>> Nothing. It wasn't mayhem in the decades before 2015 and it won't
>> suddenly become a problem now. The big guys are always going to try some
>> crap until someone calls them on it, "net neutrality" or not.
>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Vance Shipley]

Because it's the fair thing to do. As a neighbour I would greatly
appreciate it.

On Dec 15, 2017 21:05, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:

> Why?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> 
> 
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
> 
> --
> *From: *"Rory Conaway" 
> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 13, 2017 11:04:43 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>
> I want to be able to throttle torrent users.  Beyond that, I don't think
> it will affect us much in areas of high-competition.
>
> Rory
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM
> To: wireless@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>
> On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
> > What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being
> > over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and
> > DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've been thinking this
> > will have little impact on us and our customers (since we don't intend
> > on changing our policies) but I may not be thinking about the bigger
> > picture enough. Perhaps my bandwidth and upstream fiber providers will
> > raise rates or charge premium fees for fast lanes to middle mile access.
>
>
> Nothing. It wasn't mayhem in the decades before 2015 and it won't suddenly
> become a problem now. The big guys are always going to try some crap until
> someone calls them on it, "net neutrality" or not.
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Josh Luthman]

Damn DMCA notices!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Dec 15, 2017 10:34 AM, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:

> Why?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> 
> 
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
> 
> --
> *From: *"Rory Conaway" 
> *To: *"WISPA General List" 
> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 13, 2017 11:04:43 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>
> I want to be able to throttle torrent users.  Beyond that, I don't think
> it will affect us much in areas of high-competition.
>
> Rory
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM
> To: wireless@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>
> On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
> > What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being
> > over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and
> > DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've been thinking this
> > will have little impact on us and our customers (since we don't intend
> > on changing our policies) but I may not be thinking about the bigger
> > picture enough. Perhaps my bandwidth and upstream fiber providers will
> > raise rates or charge premium fees for fast lanes to middle mile access.
>
>
> Nothing. It wasn't mayhem in the decades before 2015 and it won't suddenly
> become a problem now. The big guys are always going to try some crap until
> someone calls them on it, "net neutrality" or not.
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Mike Hammett]

Why? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

- Original Message -

From: "Rory Conaway"  
To: "WISPA General List"  
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 11:04:43 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers 

I want to be able to throttle torrent users. Beyond that, I don't think it will 
affect us much in areas of high-competition. 

Rory 

-Original Message- 
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Seth Mattinen 
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM 
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers 

On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote: 
> What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being 
> over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and 
> DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've been thinking this 
> will have little impact on us and our customers (since we don't intend 
> on changing our policies) but I may not be thinking about the bigger 
> picture enough. Perhaps my bandwidth and upstream fiber providers will 
> raise rates or charge premium fees for fast lanes to middle mile access. 


Nothing. It wasn't mayhem in the decades before 2015 and it won't suddenly 
become a problem now. The big guys are always going to try some crap until 
someone calls them on it, "net neutrality" or not. 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality bandwidth providers

[Adair Winter]

Torrent traffic is less than 1% of our network traffic. It's never been a
big deal for us like it probably once was.

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Dan Thompson 
wrote:

> Why do you want to be able to throttle torrent users specifically?
>
>
>  On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:04:43 -0500 * r...@triadwireless.net
>  * wrote 
>
> I want to be able to throttle torrent users. Beyond that, I don't think it
> will affect us much in areas of high-competition.
>
> Rory
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM
> To: wireless@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers
>
> On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
> > What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being
> > over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and
> > DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've been thinking this
> > will have little impact on us and our customers (since we don't intend
> > on changing our policies) but I may not be thinking about the bigger
> > picture enough. Perhaps my bandwidth and upstream fiber providers will
> > raise rates or charge premium fees for fast lanes to middle mile access.
>
>
> Nothing. It wasn't mayhem in the decades before 2015 and it won't suddenly
> become a problem now. The big guys are always going to try some crap until
> someone calls them on it, "net neutrality" or not.
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality bandwidth providers

[Dan Thompson]

Why do you want to be able to throttle torrent users specifically?

 On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:04:43 -0500 r...@triadwireless.net wrote 

I want to be able to throttle torrent users. Beyond that, I don't think it will 
affect us much in areas of high-competition. 

Rory 

-Original Message- 
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Seth Mattinen 
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM 
To: wireless@wispa.org 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers 

On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote: 
> What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being 
> over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and 
> DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've been thinking this 
> will have little impact on us and our customers (since we don't intend 
> on changing our policies) but I may not be thinking about the bigger 
> picture enough. Perhaps my bandwidth and upstream fiber providers will 
> raise rates or charge premium fees for fast lanes to middle mile access. 


Nothing. It wasn't mayhem in the decades before 2015 and it won't suddenly 
become a problem now. The big guys are always going to try some crap until 
someone calls them on it, "net neutrality" or not. 

___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

[Rory Conaway]

I want to be able to throttle torrent users.  Beyond that, I don't think it 
will affect us much in areas of high-competition.

Rory

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:57 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net neutrality & bandwidth providers

On 12/10/17 2:44 PM, Chadwick Wachs wrote:
> What are the current thoughts on the effects of net neutrality being 
> over turned on our bandwidth providers? I understand how the cable and 
> DSL companies may react but as a small WISP, I've been thinking this 
> will have little impact on us and our customers (since we don't intend 
> on changing our policies) but I may not be thinking about the bigger 
> picture enough. Perhaps my bandwidth and upstream fiber providers will 
> raise rates or charge premium fees for fast lanes to middle mile access.


Nothing. It wasn't mayhem in the decades before 2015 and it won't suddenly 
become a problem now. The big guys are always going to try some crap until 
someone calls them on it, "net neutrality" or not.

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless