[WISPA] What are the must have Android apps for installers
Upgrading to a smartphone, HTC Hero S. Just wanted to see what tools are available for wireless installers. ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] LMR Cables
http://www.amazon.com/F4-Tape-Self-fusing-Silicone-Black/dp/B002LA2258 I use this stuff and never had a proble. On 2/8/2012 12:39 PM, Carl Shivers wrote: We are having periodic trouble with our LMR connections. We're using 3M 2228 Rubber Mastic tape. Pulled one and it had moisture in it even with a solid wrap. Any suggestions? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Truck Mounted Survey Antennas
Does anyone have recommendations on truck mounted antennas for 2.4GHz and 5.8GHz? (magnetic mount) Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3.65Ghz and HAMs
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Hambands_color.pdf looks like 3300-3500MHz is available On 1/10/2012 9:03 AM, Jon Auer wrote: On some online forums I have been seeing people claiming to be hams saying that they can use 3.65 Ghz as it is a ham band. Now, I thought it was for something else and now is license lite. Is this a band we share with hams? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3650 MHz permission letters?
You have to contact who manages the Satellite Earth Station and they usually have an application and various forms to fill out. If you're dealing with SES Americom, have fun. I don't know of one that they have approved. Pat On 12/12/2011 11:20 AM, Fred R. Goldstein wrote: Does anyone have a standard letter to use to ask permission from satellite earth stations to use the 3650 MHz band within the 150 mile exclusion zone? Thanks. -- Fred Goldsteink1io fgoldstein at ionary.com ionary Consulting http://www.ionary.com/ +1 617 795 2701 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Bandwidth shaping and QOS
What is everybody using? Looking to dump Net Enforcer for something else. 300+ subs, mix of Cisco 1250 and UBNT AP's. Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Ubiquiti
We are starting to notice an evident limitation with ubiquiti's polling method. It seems that when we have more than about 15 or so subs on an AP (M2) we start seeing extremely low upload from the sub (100-300mbps) even when the sub has almost perfect signal -40db. AP are running 10Mhz wide channel width and are running AirMax. Is anyone familiar with this issue and is there some kind of workaround. We are looking at deploying some M3.65 equipment but are leery if we are going to have the same problem. Any thoughts? Pat CSWEB.NET WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Rocket Availability
Scott Reed wrote: Anyone know where I can find 1 or 2 pair of Ubiquiti Rocket M5 and 2' dishes? Check with Philip Rose or Boun Senekham from Double Radius 704-927-6088 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Cisco ASA 5505
Is he actually authenticating from a radius server or is he just authenticating from the MAC access list? Andy Trimmell wrote: We have a non profit trying to use one of these routers for their connection. Previously they have a residential Netgear router that worked fine and still does. However, their IT guy can’t figure out why their new ASA 5505 Cisco router won’t connect. Same credentials and everything…… I get “authentication failed – radius timeout” Plug in the old Netgear $40 router and boom connects no problem. I’ve had him try MSCHAP and CHAP and both do the same thing. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Andy Trimmell Network Administrator atrimm...@precisionds.com 317.831.3000 ext 211 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] chipset vs standard based beam forming?
A good primer on 802.11n. Beamfroring starts at page 6. Brough Turner wrote: As Mike points out, beamforming is an optional part of the 802.11n standard and there is at least some silicon support for this option emerging (more on that in a moment). The confusion arises because there are several different things which are legitimately called beamforming. The simplest is a switched beamformer in which there are multiple directional antenna elements and the radio is connected to the appropriate elements as needed. This is what Ruckus Wireless does today. They have 12 or more fixed elements and on a frame-by-frame basis they decide which two of those elements to connect to the two terminals on the Atheros (2x2 MIMO) Wi-Fi chip. A bunch of people have patents here, but the ideas are very old so the patents may not be very valuable. Next is phased array beamformers. Here there are multiple simple antenna elements typically equally spaced in an array. Phase delays are introduced so, via constructive and destructive interference, you end up with a beam. Then that beam is steered by varying the phase delays. This is also well established technologies that the military have been using for (many) decades. Finally, in MIMO systems, maximal-ratio-combining (MRC) is doing receive beamforming in as much as the computation is equivalent to placing the maximum receive lobe as close to the desired signal while placing nulls as close as possible to the primary interferers. While the widespead 2x2 MIMO chips are primarily used for horizontal and vertical polarization, 3x3 and 4x4 MIMO chips are emerging. With 4x4 we can expect to see transmit beamforming via phasing and receive beamforming via MRC. Indeed, two silicon startups, Quantenna Communications in California and Celeno Wireless in Israel, have announced Wi-Fi chips that support 4x4 MIMO with transmit beamforming. The Quantenna chip is used in the Netgear WNHDB3004. The 802.11n standard specifies how the needed information is passed, so the computations that Quantenna and Celeno (and others in the future) do can be carried out when devices from different vendors interoperate. Thanks, Brough Skype: brough Mobile: +1 617 285 0433 http://blogs.broughturner.com On 10/26/10 12:37 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=4558648 In the IEEE 802.11n draft standard, beamforming is adopted as an optional feature to improve signal reception and simplify receiver design. Beamforming is available in 802.11N, though I don't know of any products using that standard. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com On 10/25/2010 5:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: Rogelio, Please don't take this the wrong way. You are trying to understand a very complex 'patented' technology via a very simplistic understanding. Beam forming is a very complex (lots of analytical analysis done on a real time basis) technology, there are a number of Masters PHD Thesis papers on this topic that you can find by Googling. There is no 'chipset' for it Each of the folks you mention utilize 'internally developed' patented techniques of applying the 'Beam Forming concept. so there is no 'standard' the chipset are simple transmitters and signal processors (math units..) The beam forming technology works in both direction (sending receiving). There is no such thing as a 'omni' beam forming antenna. The antenna pattern is dynamically changed to focus / lock on to the signal of the CPE that the AP is talking to. Plus, there is NO 'Beam Forming Standard...and don't expect one in the future. since it is more of a 'type of antenna design' and not a 'defined formula'. Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet Telecom On 10/25/2010 5:54 PM, Rogelio wrote: I see lots of discussion about the new 802.11n standard supporting beam forming, and I'm trying to wade through the chipset ones (e.g. Ruckus, Extricom, Meru, etc) and other solutions that claim to be more standards based. From what I gather from the marketing literature, the various vendor solutions direct the signal more efficiently towards specific targets (focusing beam in certain direction, monitoring interference, interference nulling, etc), but that seems to have limited effectiveness when it comes to receiving transmitted packets from the client end (resulting in slow uplink?). In some of these cases, the receive antennas are just an omni antenna. (802.11 is not a timing based protocol, so I don't see how beamforming benefits on the receive side will ever happen) So is the best that we can hope for with beam forming is faster download but the same old upload? How will the standard (once baked in more vendor gear) do things differently?
Re: [WISPA] Taking the plunge
In my experience Tranzeo and UBNT don't play nice together. If you don't mind switching out your tranzeo CPE's with UBNT gear you'll be fine. Steve Barnes wrote: All my APs are Mikrotik. My CPE’s are a mix of Tranzeo and UBNT. I have a AP with 58 Clients on it and starting to get complaints about slowdowns. They are all setup 10 MHz channel 802.11g. This is a tower that due to contractual issues I cannot add anymore equipment. So I am considering taking down the Mikrotik and 120 degree sector and putting up a UBNT Rocket and Airmax 120 sector. It will take time to physically switch all my clients to new UBNT Airmax equipment but would like to get it done before the snow flies. Has anyone down this? Success? I know I cannot turn on Airmax till everyone is on the UBNT with that capability but does it work fine till you get it on? *Steve Barnes* RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service http://www.rcwifi.com/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] 900MHz Backhaul Solutions
I just want to see what everyone else is using and what their experiences are. Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Ping message
Are my messages getting through? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Ping list
Are my messages getting to the list Thanks WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Ping message
Just checking my communication with the list, sorry... WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Ping list
Sorry, I was suffering from a barracuda beta release bug Thanks On 5/12/10 4:37 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote: Sorry Lights are ON .. but no-one is at Home. :) On 5/12/2010 5:28 PM, Pat Nix wrote: Are my messages getting to the list Thanks - --- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ - --- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- -- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Stimulus waste
Marlon was that the NoaNet build out? Marlon K. Schafer wrote: We protested a project out here. A fiber build with wireless overlay. There is already fiber, DSL AND wireless. The project was funded anyway. It's not about the consumer folks And it's CERTAINLY NOT about using OUR money efficiently. marlon - Original Message - From: Matt Larsen - Lists li...@manageisp.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 6:58 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Stimulus waste I filed 32 protests during the first round of the stimulus plan, and none of them were funded. Protest long and protest often. From what I have seen so far, most of the frivolous projects have been rejected handily. Don't get all worked up about the waste until it finally comes to pass. It was pretty clear from looking at the first round apps that there were a lot of stupid, wasteful applications. Matt Larsen vistabeam.com On 4/7/2010 7:29 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote: Insert explicatives here Thats 26 Y E A R S of my higher end tier of service, per customer. Why the #3!! do things not get BID out? Who can do X users for the lowest $ I mean come on, that is just horrible. It doesnt even factor in what those new users will be paying for the service. I need to find out if they have applies for my area, I manage client networks with qwest dsl and they have been giving some BS about upgrading modems (for a /mo fee) when all the sites have adsl2+ modems. Not good On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Travis Johnsont...@ida.net wrote: Hi, So, as I said since the Broadband Stimulus act was passed, the money will be wasted. Qwest just applied for $467 MILLION dollars to upgrade their DSL infrastructure in my coverage areas. They want to expand and upgrade the slower 7meg connections to go up to 12 to 40 megabytes per second. The article says they will increase coverage to 29,922 new customers. That's an average cost of $15,607 PER CUSTOMER. Many of the areas they list (Idaho Falls, Rexburg, Ammon, Blackfoot, Rigby, Shelley, etc.) already have at least 3 providers and some have 4 or 5 provider choices. Let the waste begin :( Travis Microserv WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Anyone gotten a 3.65 license lately?
Ours took about 25 days ralphlists wrote: Thanks I'm not in any exclusion zone and there's no weird circumstances. I'm really just looking to find someone who recently got a license to tell me how long it actually took. And then of course I'd like to find someone who recently added a base station so I can get an idea of that timing as well. I'm looking for something like I just received my nationwide and it took 23 days or I just registered a base station and it took 4 days. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Pat O'Connor Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 11:11 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone gotten a 3.65 license lately? If you are in an exclusion zone with SES Americom you can count on never as far as being able to deploy WiMax. ralphlists wrote: It is a new nationwide license. But I'm also interested in the time frame for the base station registration as well. It's not me. It is for a friend. My nationwide license took 4 months, but that was back when they first came out. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Randy Cosby Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:58 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone gotten a 3.65 license lately? Are you applying for a license, or a new location on an existing license? On 3/9/2010 8:53 AM, ralphlists wrote: How long is the FCC taking these days for a new license? Thanks WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Anyone gotten a 3.65 license lately?
lakel...@gbcx.net wrote: Never say never. Maybe if you are right next to their site but I am pretty confident that you can get a site approved with the right engineering study and maybe a waiver request. Depends on how bad you want it -B- Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Yes it does depend on how bad you want it. I don't want it bad enough to have to pay for each customer location have to be approved on a case by case basis by Comtrain as per their demands. Ask Marlon about these clowns. I'm 143km from them and I have four, 5000+ foot ridge lines / mountain ranges between us. Not to mention my base stations are pointed away from them. -Original Message- From: Pat O'Connor p...@inlandnet.com Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:11:27 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone gotten a 3.65 license lately? If you are in an exclusion zone with SES Americom you can count on never as far as being able to deploy WiMax. ralphlists wrote: It is a new nationwide license. But I'm also interested in the time frame for the base station registration as well. It's not me. It is for a friend. My nationwide license took 4 months, but that was back when they first came out. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Randy Cosby Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:58 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone gotten a 3.65 license lately? Are you applying for a license, or a new location on an existing license? On 3/9/2010 8:53 AM, ralphlists wrote: How long is the FCC taking these days for a new license? Thanks WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Anyone gotten a 3.65 license lately?
Correction: RF Studies on a case by case basis done by Comsearch. Pat O'Connor wrote: lakel...@gbcx.net wrote: Never say never. Maybe if you are right next to their site but I am pretty confident that you can get a site approved with the right engineering study and maybe a waiver request. Depends on how bad you want it -B- Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Yes it does depend on how bad you want it. I don't want it bad enough to have to pay for each customer location have to be approved on a case by case basis by Comtrain as per their demands. Ask Marlon about these clowns. I'm 143km from them and I have four, 5000+ foot ridge lines / mountain ranges between us. Not to mention my base stations are pointed away from them. -Original Message- From: Pat O'Connor p...@inlandnet.com Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:11:27 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone gotten a 3.65 license lately? If you are in an exclusion zone with SES Americom you can count on never as far as being able to deploy WiMax. ralphlists wrote: It is a new nationwide license. But I'm also interested in the time frame for the base station registration as well. It's not me. It is for a friend. My nationwide license took 4 months, but that was back when they first came out. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Randy Cosby Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:58 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone gotten a 3.65 license lately? Are you applying for a license, or a new location on an existing license? On 3/9/2010 8:53 AM, ralphlists wrote: How long is the FCC taking these days for a new license? Thanks WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Tech support: Windows XP Blue Screen of Death
MS update KB977165 is the culprit. If you remove that update through the recovery console the computer will boot and work properly. Steve Barnes wrote: For those of you who do tech support. We have had 6 computers come in to our repair center today that have Windows XP that all they do in normal or safe mode is give a Blue Screen of Death. They all claim that their computers did a windows update yesterday and after that they no longer work. Since we supply the internet it must be our fault. We have found no fix but a windows reload. This is for informational purposes only for your tech support departments. Steve Barnes RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Can anyone recommend a 5GHz grid antenna for UBNT for Bullet M5HP
Just looking to see what everyone else is using. I'm in the test phase of a 5.8Ghz AP roll out. TIA Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Can anyone recommend a 5GHz grid antenna for UBNT for Bullet M5HP
I want to use the Bullet for a CPE. Sorry, I should have clarified what I was looking for in my original post. Josh Luthman wrote: I don't think anyone here is wanting dish installs =P Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. --- Albert Einstein On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.comwrote: I'm using a lot of the Pac Wireless grids but only cause they're cheap. If I had the cash I'd go with a dish, not a grid. They work find but in some installs they may as well be an omni for all the RF they scatter. Bob- -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Pat O'Connor Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 2:42 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Can anyone recommend a 5GHz grid antenna for UBNT for Bullet M5HP Just looking to see what everyone else is using. I'm in the test phase of a 5.8Ghz AP roll out. TIA Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Service in Kingfisher, OK
Anyone serving the area in or around Kingfisher in western Ok.? Have a potential lead. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Fixing buried cable
Scotch Lock each pair together. Wrap two pairs around the main wire in one direction, and two in the other direction. Cover with a RG-11 coax splice boot. It's filled with non-conductive gel. Scott Reed wrote: I have a customer that cut the cat 5 right at the ground in September. I put a jack at the ground and a plug on the remaining cable and wrapped it up as well as I could, knowing I would be back. Sure enough, today I went back to re-fix it in the sleet. What fun. I think it is better because I used a cat5 splice device and filled it with RTV. Anyone have a way to fix a cable that is underground? I would rather not run a new cable and make her bury another one if there is another way. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Times Microwave EZ connectors
I just switched to this. http://www.timesmicrowave.com/content/pr/wk-s.pdf's Tom DeReggi wrote: We use the 3M also. We have had some water intrusion issues, but... we have almost always been able to attribute it to poor installation technique. Taping is unforgiving. When done right, it protects for like eternity. When its done poorly its lucky to last a year. Must use Mastic underneith, and UV on top. Must overlap 1/4 and position it like a shingle, so water does not run into seam but away from it. The underlayer must be stretched tight. Must extend tape to far edges w/ atleast 1 on cable side. Must avoid creating air pockets. Must have tape layers thick enough, atleast 1/8 deep or more. It also helps big time to use Scotch coat, as a third outer layer. We ahve never had a a seal fail that we had used scotchcoat. We rarely use Scotch coat anymore because its gooey and hard to work with to brush on. But its worth using for critical back hauls that you never want to have to touch again. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 2:14 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Times Microwave EZ connectors Yeah, self vulcanizing rubber :-). I use this: http://solutions.3m.com/wps/portal/3M/en_US/3MElectrical/Home/ProductsServices/Products/?PC_7_RJH9U5230GE3E02LECIE20OES1_nid=0L2RH0Z4C7beV8CW66MTMZgl A royal pain to take back apart. But if it is easy to get off it's not very good of a seal :-). marlon - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson To: WISPA General List Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 10:57 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Times Microwave EZ connectors I second this. We have used this for 5+ years now and haven't had a single water issue since we started using it. And it's cheap, and easy to work with in the summer heat and the winter cold. Travis Josh Luthman wrote: Best. Stuff. Ever. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0002ZPINC/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1pf_rd_t=201pf_rd_i=B00075J4J6pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DERpf_rd_r=0YKHJM87AJ2TBD52DRE2 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. --- Albert Einstein On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.comwrote: Rubber tape rules on this end. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:50 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Times Microwave EZ connectors Heat shrink doesn't work in the cold. It will get hard (the glue) and as things move in the wind etc. it'll allow water in. Been there done that. NOTHING works better than self vulcanizing rubber tape. If what you use is easy to get off it's not a good tight seal. sigh It sure can't be that hard to build a connector that seals without the tape! sigh marlon - Original Message - From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 6:15 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Times Microwave EZ connectors Yes - hate the mess but seals the best! On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:43 PM, os10ru...@gmail.com wrote: Coax-seal On Nov 19, 2009, at 6:42 PM, AJ wrote: CANUSA adhesive shrink tubing is your friend :) On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:41 PM, lakel...@gbcx.net wrote: No 400 connector from any of the manufacturers is weatherproof by itself. You need to weatherproof all of your connections. If they are not getting wet you are lucky. Plain and simple. Bob Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: MDK rea...@muddyfrogwater.us Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:20:52 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Times Microwave EZ connectors I've run out of these, and none of the vendors I use commonly carry them. Anyone out west have these? Yeah, I know, it costs more to buy two of these than a whole pre-built 10 foot cable, but every danged pre-built I buy has water issues. We have never had to seal any of the cables we built ourselves, and none of them have ever leaked (except when someone who'll forever remain nameless forgot to tighten the cable...), but I have no luck at all with the pre-made I've bought from multiple places. Our temporary site needed to go up in a real hurry, so I bought a whole pile of parts and cables, and most of them have had issues.
[WISPA] Need a new AP
I have one small group on an old Cisco Aironet 350, which only does 802.11b. 1) I want to have at least a b/g mix, n capable a bonus. 2) Must support WEP encryption, but be able to handle a mix of WEP and WPA simultaneously. (WEP for legacy clients that I haven't upgraded) 3) Must play nice with Tranzeo CPQ and CPE200. You input is helpful. TIA, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Need a new AP
Bullet M2's won't do WEP until the release of firmware version 5.1 which has been in just a couple of weeks for at least the last two months. Jayson Baker wrote: UBNT Bullet M2? On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:59 PM, pat p...@inlandnet.com wrote: I have one small group on an old Cisco Aironet 350, which only does 802.11b. 1) I want to have at least a b/g mix, n capable a bonus. 2) Must support WEP encryption, but be able to handle a mix of WEP and WPA simultaneously. (WEP for legacy clients that I haven't upgraded) 3) Must play nice with Tranzeo CPQ and CPE200. You input is helpful. TIA, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Need a new AP
I have 3 AP's with Cisco Aironet 1250's that handle both WEP and WPA at the same time, and do it very well. Josh Luthman wrote: WEP and WPA at the same time? Haven't seen that anywhere myself. Who cares about the waste of effort protocol though? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. --- Albert Einstein On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Jayson Baker jay...@spectrasurf.comwrote: UBNT Bullet M2? On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:59 PM, pat p...@inlandnet.com wrote: I have one small group on an old Cisco Aironet 350, which only does 802.11b. 1) I want to have at least a b/g mix, n capable a bonus. 2) Must support WEP encryption, but be able to handle a mix of WEP and WPA simultaneously. (WEP for legacy clients that I haven't upgraded) 3) Must play nice with Tranzeo CPQ and CPE200. You input is helpful. TIA, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Need a new AP
Thanks George. I follow DSLR but missed that one. George Morris wrote: Mike put up a bit of info about what's on the way in 5.1 on DSLR. Appears we are getting close to seeing a beta. Features that are in 5.1: - DynamicACK is rewritten with many improvements. - Full 802.11abg support - Full Encryption support (WEP, WPA/WPA2 AES/TKIP ect) - ACK Removal for Point to Point links - AutoRate selection Algorithm is rewritten. - New Web server for the software and a lot more. The Beta should be on the forum tommorow and the best part is the software will be free. Mike George -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of AJ Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 5:21 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Need a new AP Hahaha Gmail ads came up with this firmware as I was reading this thread: http://www.fireserve.com/products/ubiquiti/bullet-m-firmware.php chop *Adds 802.11-compatible encryption modes *The stock Ubiquiti firmware only supports WPA-AES encryption. Our firmware adds support for 64-bit and 128-bit WEP, WPA-TKIP and WPA2-TKIP. /chop Pretty spendy for just a single unit... On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Jayson Baker jay...@spectrasurf.comwrote: In that case, use a MikroTik RB411R. Integrated radio, and MT can do various encryptions you need. Sorry, I overlooked that part of the request. On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:16 PM, pat p...@inlandnet.com wrote: Bullet M2's won't do WEP until the release of firmware version 5.1 which has been in just a couple of weeks for at least the last two months. Jayson Baker wrote: UBNT Bullet M2? On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:59 PM, pat p...@inlandnet.com wrote: I have one small group on an old Cisco Aironet 350, which only does 802.11b. 1) I want to have at least a b/g mix, n capable a bonus. 2) Must support WEP encryption, but be able to handle a mix of WEP and WPA simultaneously. (WEP for legacy clients that I haven't upgraded) 3) Must play nice with Tranzeo CPQ and CPE200. You input is helpful. TIA, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe
Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz Coalition to approach FCC for rule changes
How about reducing the size of grandfathered satellite station exclusion zones. Dealing with SES Americom is worse than dealing with a government agency. Pat Kevin Suitor wrote: Mike, We have been working with the FCC team for the past year on a mechanism that has already been accepted by Industry Canada for the new 3.65 GHz band opening up this winter (entire 50 MHz). It seems to us that the upper 25 MHz may never be opened up; this is a key action item for the committee. Kevin -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 1:22 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz Coalition to approach FCC for rule changes Has anyone put forth a serious effort to develop the mechanism they call for, or have people seriously tried, and just been rejected without just reasoning? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- From: Kevin Suitor ksui...@redlinecommunications.com Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:39 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org; WISPA Members BTOP-BIP List btop-...@wispa.org Cc: Keith Doucet kdou...@redlinecommunications.com Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz Coalition to approach FCC for rule changes To list members: Yesterday, Redline hosted a conference call with 15 operator participants to kick off a coalition of operators who have deployed or plan to deploy broadband wireless systems in the 3.65 GHz band in the US, with the goal to discuss the current license exempt rules, some of the coexistence issues being experienced in the field, suggestions for improvements/resolution, and the necessary steps to influence change within the FCC. I encourage any interested operators (or vendors) to contact Keith Doucet, Redline's VP Customer Advocacy (kdou...@redlinecommunications.com or +1.905.479.8344 x2298). Keith has participated in the rule setting for the 3.65 GHz band in Canada and has extensive experience in working with regulators internationally. Keith plans on hosting a follow-up call next week on this topic. Thanks, Kevin Redline Communications Inc. Kevin Suitor Vice President, Corporate Marketing 302 Town Centre Blvd. Markham, ON L3R 0E8 CANADA o: +1 905.948.2299 f: +1 647.723.0451 m: +1 416.508.1252 Skype: ksuitor e-mail: ksui...@redlinecommunications.com Web: www.redlinecommunications.com Advancing Broadband Wireless - Putting WiMAX in Motion Think green before printing this email IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Redline immediately by email at postmas...@redlinecommunications.com. Thank you. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ �\�K�ܙ��\\�XZ[ ��\�[\� WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] How are you handling VOIP services over WiFi?
I haven't been able to find much in the way of white papers for information regarding VOIP over WiFi. If someone could share some info with me I would appreciate it. Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] 5.8Ghz Sector Antenna Recommendations
Looking to add a few 5.8GHz sectors, and I would like know what everyone else is using. My first on that will go up ASAP is a 120' sector antenna, HPOL, N-connector. Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] 3.65GHz Grandfathered satellite earth stations
Anybody else having any luck with these people. They're trying to tell me I might have to clear all my customer sites for a proposed WiMax deployment on a case by case basis. I'm at the edge of the 150km exclusion zone and have a mountain range in between us. This is getting really annoying. Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3.65GHz Grandfathered satellite earth stations
SES Americom, and they suffer from cranial rectitus. Tim Sylvester wrote: Who are these people? The FCC or the satellite earth station people? The FCC describes an alternative for determining a safe distance for locating a station with in an FSS protection zone in Appendix D of the Report and Order authorizing the 3.65 - 3.70 GHz band. You can read the full document here: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-56A1.pdf This is the intro to the appendix. * APPENDIX D: A Methodology For Locating Fixed Stations Within The FSS Earth Station Protection Zone The rules adopted herein require that fixed stations in the 3650-3700 MHz band be located at least 150 km from any grandfathered FSS earth station unless all affected licensees agree on closer spacing. Below, we present as an example, one methodology that can be used to determine a safe distance within the FSS earth station protection zone where a fixed station can be located without increasing the potential of that station to cause harmful interference to the earth station. We reiterate that this is being presented only as an example of one methodology. We recognize that there are many methods for providing the required protection, such as locating the fixed station behind an obstruction, and that licensees are free to propose any method they deem appropriate. * I would assume that you could use this method to calculate the safe distance for operating at 3.65GHz and present it to the FCC and the FSS earth station operator. I will need to do this for my WiMAX deployment which will have two mountain ranges between the WiMAX network and the earth station. Tim -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of pat Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 9:43 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] 3.65GHz Grandfathered satellite earth stations Anybody else having any luck with these people. They're trying to tell me I might have to clear all my customer sites for a proposed WiMax deployment on a case by case basis. I'm at the edge of the 150km exclusion zone and have a mountain range in between us. This is getting really annoying. Thanks, Pat --- - WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ --- - WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3.65GHz Grandfathered satellite earth stations
They sent our site information for the base stations to Comsearch for an RF analysis so they have a map. They also have a map of my customer locations, none of which point in their direction. I also have a mountain range that goes from around 5000 feet to 7000 feet in elevation between me and them. They have the product information sheets for the antennas at the client's sites. No attorney is involved yet. Tim Sylvester wrote: Do you have permission from SES Americom to at least install your base station? If so, register your base station on the FCC site. Once the base station is approved, start registering your client sites. Tim -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of pat Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 9:59 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65GHz Grandfathered satellite earth stations SES Americom, and they suffer from cranial rectitus. Tim Sylvester wrote: Who are these people? The FCC or the satellite earth station people? The FCC describes an alternative for determining a safe distance for locating a station with in an FSS protection zone in Appendix D of the Report and Order authorizing the 3.65 - 3.70 GHz band. You can read the full document here: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-56A1.pdf This is the intro to the appendix. * APPENDIX D: A Methodology For Locating Fixed Stations Within The FSS Earth Station Protection Zone The rules adopted herein require that fixed stations in the 3650-3700 MHz band be located at least 150 km from any grandfathered FSS earth station unless all affected licensees agree on closer spacing. Below, we present as an example, one methodology that can be used to determine a safe distance within the FSS earth station protection zone where a fixed station can be located without increasing the potential of that station to cause harmful interference to the earth station. We reiterate that this is being presented only as an example of one methodology. We recognize that there are many methods for providing the required protection, such as locating the fixed station behind an obstruction, and that licensees are free to propose any method they deem appropriate. * I would assume that you could use this method to calculate the safe distance for operating at 3.65GHz and present it to the FCC and the FSS earth station operator. I will need to do this for my WiMAX deployment which will have two mountain ranges between the WiMAX network and the earth station. Tim -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of pat Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 9:43 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] 3.65GHz Grandfathered satellite earth stations Anybody else having any luck with these people. They're trying to tell me I might have to clear all my customer sites for a proposed WiMax deployment on a case by case basis. I'm at the edge of the 150km exclusion zone and have a mountain range in between us. This is getting really annoying. Thanks, Pat --- - WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ --- - WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ - --- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ - --- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ --- - WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ --- - WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http
Re: [WISPA] OT, pesky email stuff
We're switching to this over this weekend. http://www.redcondor.com/products/appliances.htm rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote: One of the things I've done in the spam war is to use something called ASSP, which is just Anti Spam SMTP Proxy. It does a passable job of prevening inbound spam, and it prevents anyone not on my network from sending mail out through my server, via firewall rules put on the server. You can use a similar setup to have your customer's emails filtered outbound through something like this.It can also be placed on alternate ports and using firewall rules, prevent any cust omer from sending mail directly out. I haven't needed to do that, at least not yet. ASSP, when run on the mail server machine itself, can also act as an authentication and filtering of outbound emails. insert witty tagline here - Original Message - From: Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 8:33 AM Subject: [WISPA] OT, pesky email stuff Hi All, What are you guys doing for email these days? I LOVE my setup for it's reliability, ease of use etc. Hacked customer accounts and virus's are killing me though. We don't catch things until 100,000s of messages go out and we get black listed. This has now happened 3 or 4 times in the last couple of years. My server admins aren't coming up with a solution to this other than to limit cc's to 25 per message. We did that once before and my phone rang off the hook because people can't send jokes to their friends. The other thing that makes it hard is that the log files that I get (up to 40 megs per day!) don't list the authenticated sender, only the reply address. So I see tens of thousands of messages from a user that's not even mine (faked info). sigh We use Courier MTA. My thought is to set the server to allow a max of 1000 messages per day per user. And to somehow make the log file ONLY send me the number of messages received per a user, and the number sent, user name and ip addy of all those sending. Twice now I've asked about that idea and gotten no response from the server admins. Suggestions? laters, marlon WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3.65GHz Exclusion Zone
It is being 150km form the grandfathered earth station. I'm going through the same thing right now getting an agreement from them to operate WiMax gear. BTW I'm at a 145km distance from them, but the FCC won't register my base stations without an agreement. 3-dB Networks wrote: Okay I'm banging my head against the wall a bit this morning J Subpart Z of the FCC Part 90 Rules - Wireless Broadband Serices in the 3650-3700 MHz Band - Section 90.1331 states: (a)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, base and fixed stations may not be located within 150 km of any grandfathered satellite earth station operating in the 3650-3700 MHz band. The coordinates of these stations are available at http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sd/3650; My interpretation of that rule would mean that you need to draw a circle of a radius of 150Km from each station, and this is your exclusion zone. Yet many maps on the web show this 150Km requirement as diameter. not as a radius. Our office would be outside of the exclusion zone if it is a diameter requirement, yet inside the exclusion zone if it is a radius requirement. Can anyone point me to something from the FCC that specifies what the requirement is? Thank you, Daniel White 3-dB Networks http://www.3dbnetworks.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Finding Available Licensed Frequencies
http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/searchLicense.jsp Forbes Mercy wrote: Is there a tool or resource to find out if certain frequencies are available or who owns them to lease them? I'm particularly looking for 2.5 in my area. Thanks, Forbes Mercy President - Washington Broadband, Inc. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Cell phone with wifi?
Interesting article in regards to your topic. http://www.voipplanet.com/trends/article.php/3820346 I'm out here in the sticks with limited cell coverage in a lot of areas and this looks like a promising line of business. George Rogato wrote: Is there a cell phone that can connect to someones wifi ap and still make phone calls or recieve data when not in range of the cell service? Thanks WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] What do you charge for a wireless router setup?
I was thinking a $35 fee for on site setup. A $20 fee if they brought the router in within 48 hrs of the scheduled installation date. Is this appropriate? What are the rest of you doing? Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] What do you charge for a wireless router setup?
They have to pay for the uniforms and stylish vehicles somehow. ;-) D. Ryan Spott wrote: Have you seen what geeksquad charges? http://www.geeksquad.com/services/computer/category.aspx?id=2567 Don't sell yourself short. :) ryan Pat O'Connor wrote: I was thinking a $35 fee for on site setup. A $20 fee if they brought the router in within 48 hrs of the scheduled installation date. Is this appropriate? What are the rest of you doing? Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3650Mhz and Wimax Vendors
Anybody use Airspan for Wimax? Michael Baird wrote: It was interesting, but I was hoping for some more first hand experience reporting. Essentially the only explanation for improved range was a lower noise floor, which isn't a wimax thing, but a 3.65 thing. I think a lot of the 802.16d/e talk is market speak, I'm trying to get through that and establish technical reasons why one or the other is superior. Regards Michael Baird So the recent thread on Wimax was quite interesting. I need to read up on the different technologies involved. I believe that a fixed deployment is sufficient for many many many needs and markets (wireless local loop if you will). If people want mobility/end user wireless they can hang an 802.11 AP off the ethernet port of whatever CPE. Wimax directly to the end device doesn't make much sense to me, in most markets and use cases. Obviously if you are supporting a highly mobile workforce (say public sector type stuff) then it makes a lot more sense. It got me thinking... if one was a new WISP entering an un(der)served market, it seems that it would not make sense to deploy standard 802.11 gear, but rather Wimax gear in 3650Mhz. Is this an accurate assessment? One particular area that I'm targeting, doesn't have any broadband available (other then 3g from Verzion). So they would need to purchase CPE anyway, and it wouldn't be anything they could get from Best Buy (DSL or Cable modem). I'm in the process of negotiating access to the excluded areas (in Southern California), but it's been slow going. Once I gain access it will open up many areas to some sorely needed competition. So who are the vendors in this space worth considering? What are peoples experiences with the sales process (both pre and post sales engineering) etc etc. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3650Mhz and Wimax Vendors
Geeze. Not comforting at all. Aperto is my first choice now because I believe they use TR-069. But I wanted to see if anyone had used Airspan's Macromax product. Matt Liotta wrote: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/business/epaper/2009/04/20/0420airspan.html -Matt On Apr 22, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Pat O'Connor wrote: Anybody use Airspan for Wimax? Michael Baird wrote: It was interesting, but I was hoping for some more first hand experience reporting. Essentially the only explanation for improved range was a lower noise floor, which isn't a wimax thing, but a 3.65 thing. I think a lot of the 802.16d/e talk is market speak, I'm trying to get through that and establish technical reasons why one or the other is superior. Regards Michael Baird So the recent thread on Wimax was quite interesting. I need to read up on the different technologies involved. I believe that a fixed deployment is sufficient for many many many needs and markets (wireless local loop if you will). If people want mobility/end user wireless they can hang an 802.11 AP off the ethernet port of whatever CPE. Wimax directly to the end device doesn't make much sense to me, in most markets and use cases. Obviously if you are supporting a highly mobile workforce (say public sector type stuff) then it makes a lot more sense. It got me thinking... if one was a new WISP entering an un(der)served market, it seems that it would not make sense to deploy standard 802.11 gear, but rather Wimax gear in 3650Mhz. Is this an accurate assessment? One particular area that I'm targeting, doesn't have any broadband available (other then 3g from Verzion). So they would need to purchase CPE anyway, and it wouldn't be anything they could get from Best Buy (DSL or Cable modem). I'm in the process of negotiating access to the excluded areas (in Southern California), but it's been slow going. Once I gain access it will open up many areas to some sorely needed competition. So who are the vendors in this space worth considering? What are peoples experiences with the sales process (both pre and post sales engineering) etc etc. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
Marlon I checked the map, and like me, Odessa is within the 150km satellite exclusion zone for the station located in Brewster. From what I've read you need to get their permission to operate anything in the 3.65GHz spectrum. I just applied for our 3.65GHz licnse so I haven't heard anything yet. If you want I have a .kmz file I can send you with the exclusion zone. Marlon K. Schafer wrote: Thanks! marlon - Original Message - From: John Valenti vale...@lir.msu.edu To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:05 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ? Marlon, I watched the tranzeo wimax 3.65 webinar a few weeks back. They have that pico base station for about $1700. I asked, and they said yes, it would work with an omni. I know everybody says don't use an omni, but maybe it would be OK on 3.65? I was curious because most of my grain legs would max out at 20 customers (due to trees). And I certainly wouldn't want to buy three sectors just to support 20 houses. They do have a starter kit that includes two(?) customer radios for free. I'm out of money for testing things, but let us know if you try it. -John PS - they can sync multiple base stations from a central server. On Mar 18, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote: I'm looking into this too. So far I can't find a solution for rural towers. A 3 sector install at $20k? Not to service the 20 people that will be able to even see that tower Anyone have any better ideas? marlon WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Has anybody received a 3.65GHz license in a satellite exclusion zone?
I fall just on the edge of one. I wanted to know what others have experienced in this regard. Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] NS2 and EOC-2610
I saw the same results a month ago when I bought a few of the EOC-2610. Make sure you're using the latest firmware. http://www.engeniustech.com/datacom/products/resources.aspx?cat=7ID=246 That problem went away after I flashed them, and they work great. Pat Blair Davis wrote: Some interesting results from a side by side comparison of these radios... ubquity NS2 firmware XS2.ar2316.v3.1.1.3498.080725.1324 ap sees radio at -77 radio sees ap at -76 EnGenius EOC-2610 firmware 1.0.30 ap sees radio at -76 radio sees ap at -89 Transfer rates are within 5% of each other Error rate is within 1% a couple of older radios I had on hand, hooked to an 9db patch, mounted in the same place as the NS2/EOC-2610, reported rssi values within 3 db or the NS2. Looks like the reported rssi on the EOC-2610 is off quite a bit. Comments? Blair WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to know what you think.
We're looking to deploy 3.65GHz this year in a couple of different locations because of interference issues. So far they have the most compelling price point. I'd like to know how well it works in the field. All opinions appreciated. Hit me off list if you want to.\ Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations
Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today because of a power surge. Old Proxim gear, 2 x T1. I wanted some feedback from vendors/users of what they are using. I need to keep it under $5K if possible. Link distance: 8.3 miles Antennas: Andrews P3F-52-NXA WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Is there a minimum distance an amplifier has to be placed from a DC power injector?
Antennas placed at the top of a 150' tower .5 watt amp 180' run of LDF 5/8 I'd like for both to be inside our building. If I don't have to place the amp on the tower I don't want to, because this location gets about 6' of snow a year. Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] I need to get my CWNA. Anybody know of any good training classes coming up?
I can do the 5-day class, and have the budget to travel in the Western US. I appreciate all your responses. Have a happy Halloween, and great weekend. Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Does anybody have a calculator to determine antenna down angle?
Yes I'm a WISP newbie. We have an agreement with a cellular provider to put out antennas on their tower that is next to ours. The tower is almost twice as big as the one I have now, and our gear will be located at the top. I have all my elevations, and azimuths for the different tower locations we need to point at. I was wondering if there was a calculator out there that would allow me to figure out the new down angles. Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Does anybody have a calculator to determine antenna downangle?
Thanks! Tim Kerns wrote: Try this http://www.terabeam.com/support/calculations/index.php - Original Message - From: Pat O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 10:00 AM Subject: [WISPA] Does anybody have a calculator to determine antenna downangle? Yes I'm a WISP newbie. We have an agreement with a cellular provider to put out antennas on their tower that is next to ours. The tower is almost twice as big as the one I have now, and our gear will be located at the top. I have all my elevations, and azimuths for the different tower locations we need to point at. I was wondering if there was a calculator out there that would allow me to figure out the new down angles. Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] WISP Training
I am new to the WISP arena. My background is in SAN NAS deployments. I was wondering if anyone knew of any training classes coming up soon on the West Coast. Thanks, Pat WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
