Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming

2014-10-06 Thread Van Jones
We have been a customer since 2012 (switched from Meru) and we currently
have 345 access points across 2 campuses.  Our lease times for
Faculty/Staff SSID is 9 hours and our lease time for Student subnets is 5
hours.  We are much happier with Aerohive than we were with Meru, but
Aerohive is not without their issues.  The 2 issues that are affecting us
the most right now are 1) access point crash / reboots and 2) DHCP packets
being dropped on certain model access points.  We also notice issues with
the Hive Manager Online servers being overloaded from time to time.  We
will be testing a Hive Manager on premise server soon to see if it helps.



*Van K. Jones*
Network Support Manager
Mississippi College
P: 601.925.3493 | F: 601.925.3955
 Facebook http://www.facebook.com/mississippicollege |  Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/misscollege |  Vimeo
http://www.vimeo.com/misscollege

http://www.mc.edu/

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Tim Pierson timothy.pier...@live.com
wrote:

 Thanks for responding.  We have not implemented roaming and the existing
 staff felt it was not the right way to go.   I have had great success in
 the past implementing other vendor roaming products and was looking for
 someone who has the AreoHive system and would share their experience – good
 or bad.

 It sounds like you are an Aerohive site.  How large of population do you
 serve?  How long are you IP Leases?  Have you had any issues or concerns
 since deployed.  Is your community generally satisfied with the system?

 Thanks

 Tim

 From: Van Jones vjo...@mc.edu
 Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Date: Friday, October 3, 2014 at 10:22 AM
 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming

 Do you have layer 3 roaming enabled on your user profile(s)?  Actually,
 it's called User Profile/Optional Settings/GRE Tunnels/GRE Roaming for
 station isolation, then apply a tunnel policy.



 *Van K. Jones*
 Network Support Manager
 Mississippi College
 P: 601.925.3493 | F: 601.925.3955
  Facebook http://www.facebook.com/mississippicollege |  Twitter
 http://www.twitter.com/misscollege |  Vimeo
 http://www.vimeo.com/misscollege

 http://www.mc.edu/

 On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Tim Pierson timothy.pier...@live.com
 wrote:


 Greetings,





 I am looking for some input from those who have experience with Aerohive
 Wirelsss systems and who have implemented roaming across their campus.



 Our wireless network has been configured in such a manner that clients
 must obtain new IP space for each building as they move about campus.
 Although it appears that Roaming is working intra-building - inter–building
 requires disconnection and re-issuing of IP at each location.  This has
 caused major issues with IP space and has the prompted the technicians to
 implement an outrageously low TTL for IP – 15 minutes.  We are now looking
 at throwing more IP address space at each location, but I wonder if there
 is a better way?



 I have experience designing and implementing CISCO’s wireless solution
 and in that case, IP address were issued once during the day and had an
 eight hour lease.  Of course the APs' learned from each other access
 status, encryption keys or other information in cache  to maintain the
 session while moving from AP to AP.  This, I believe is the way most
 vendors’ solutions have implemented roaming.



 I am getting push back on considering a campus wide roaming strategy and
 would like to know if anyone has implemented campus wide roaming in an
 environment of 10K students or more?  I would Love to hear the good, the
 bad and the ugly, as what we are doing now isn’t working.



 Your input is greatly needed and appreciated.





 Thanks,



 Tim
 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


 __
 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:  This communication may contain confidential 
 information.
 If you are not the intended recipient or if you are not authorized to receive 
 it, please
 notify and return the message to the sender.   Unauthorized reviewing, 
 forwarding,
 copying, distributing or using this information is strictly prohibited.


 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent 
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



__
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:  This communication may contain confidential information. 
 
If you are not the intended recipient or if you are not authorized to receive 
it, please 
notify and return the message to the sender.   Unauthorized reviewing, 
forwarding,  
copying, distributing or using

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming

2014-10-06 Thread Forrester, Matthew
Van,

You noted that certain access points are dropping DHCP packets. We were 
experiencing the same thing with AP230’s (our only 802.11ac AP’s on campus).  
If your issues is specific to AP230 models, I would be curious if your issues 
are caused by the same as ours was: check your in-use / default QoS policies 
and verify that a/b/g, n and ac all have values greater than 0 Kbps for the 
Policing Rate limits.

We love Aerohive, but are not huge fans of their QC when releasing new HiveOS 
(we have an on-prem hivemanager) HiveAP firmware.

Matt Forrester
Systems Engineer
Berry College

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Van Jones
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 11:41 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming

We have been a customer since 2012 (switched from Meru) and we currently have 
345 access points across 2 campuses.  Our lease times for Faculty/Staff SSID is 
9 hours and our lease time for Student subnets is 5 hours.  We are much happier 
with Aerohive than we were with Meru, but Aerohive is not without their issues. 
 The 2 issues that are affecting us the most right now are 1) access point 
crash / reboots and 2) DHCP packets being dropped on certain model access 
points.  We also notice issues with the Hive Manager Online servers being 
overloaded from time to time.  We will be testing a Hive Manager on premise 
server soon to see if it helps.



Van K. Jones
Network Support Manager
Mississippi College
P: 601.925.3493 | F: 601.925.3955
[http://www.mc.edu/signature/email-facebook.jpg] 
Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/mississippicollege | 
[http://www.mc.edu/signature/email-twitter.jpg]  
Twitterhttp://www.twitter.com/misscollege | 
[http://www.mc.edu/signature/email-vimeo.jpg]  
Vimeohttp://www.vimeo.com/misscollege

[http://www.mc.edu/signature/logo.gif]http://www.mc.edu/

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Tim Pierson 
timothy.pier...@live.commailto:timothy.pier...@live.com wrote:
Thanks for responding.  We have not implemented roaming and the existing staff 
felt it was not the right way to go.   I have had great success in the past 
implementing other vendor roaming products and was looking for someone who has 
the AreoHive system and would share their experience – good or bad.

It sounds like you are an Aerohive site.  How large of population do you serve? 
 How long are you IP Leases?  Have you had any issues or concerns since 
deployed.  Is your community generally satisfied with the system?

Thanks

Tim

From: Van Jones vjo...@mc.edumailto:vjo...@mc.edu
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Date: Friday, October 3, 2014 at 10:22 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming

Do you have layer 3 roaming enabled on your user profile(s)?  Actually, it's 
called User Profile/Optional Settings/GRE Tunnels/GRE Roaming for station 
isolation, then apply a tunnel policy.



Van K. Jones
Network Support Manager
Mississippi College
P: 601.925.3493 | F: 601.925.3955
[http://www.mc.edu/signature/email-facebook.jpg] 
Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/mississippicollege | 
[http://www.mc.edu/signature/email-twitter.jpg]  
Twitterhttp://www.twitter.com/misscollege | 
[http://www.mc.edu/signature/email-vimeo.jpg]  
Vimeohttp://www.vimeo.com/misscollege

[http://www.mc.edu/signature/logo.gif]http://www.mc.edu/

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Tim Pierson 
timothy.pier...@live.commailto:timothy.pier...@live.com wrote:

Greetings,


I am looking for some input from those who have experience with Aerohive 
Wirelsss systems and who have implemented roaming across their campus.

Our wireless network has been configured in such a manner that clients must 
obtain new IP space for each building as they move about campus.  Although it 
appears that Roaming is working intra-building - inter–building requires 
disconnection and re-issuing of IP at each location.  This has caused major 
issues with IP space and has the prompted the technicians to implement an 
outrageously low TTL for IP – 15 minutes.  We are now looking at throwing more 
IP address space at each location, but I wonder if there is a better way?

I have experience designing and implementing CISCO’s wireless solution and in 
that case, IP address were issued once during the day and had an eight hour 
lease.  Of course the APs' learned from each other access status, encryption 
keys or other information in cache  to maintain the session while moving from 
AP to AP.  This, I believe is the way most vendors’ solutions have implemented 
roaming.

I am getting push back on considering a campus wide roaming strategy and would 
like to know if anyone has implemented campus wide roaming in an environment of 
10K students or more?  I would Love to hear

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming

2014-10-06 Thread Tim Pierson
Thanks!   We have seen a problem with our AP370s¹ that is similar.  I will
have to see if this is applicable.

Tim

From:  Forrester, Matthew mforres...@berry.edu
Reply-To:  The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Date:  Monday, October 6, 2014 at 11:13 AM
To:  WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject:  Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming

Van,
 
You noted that certain access points are dropping DHCP packets. We were
experiencing the same thing with AP230¹s (our only 802.11ac AP¹s on campus).
If your issues is specific to AP230 models, I would be curious if your
issues are caused by the same as ours was: check your in-use / default QoS
policies and verify that a/b/g, n and ac all have values greater than 0 Kbps
for the Policing Rate limits.
 
We love Aerohive, but are not huge fans of their QC when releasing new
HiveOS (we have an on-prem hivemanager) HiveAP firmware.
 
Matt Forrester
Systems Engineer
Berry College
 
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Van Jones
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 11:41 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming
 

We have been a customer since 2012 (switched from Meru) and we currently
have 345 access points across 2 campuses.  Our lease times for Faculty/Staff
SSID is 9 hours and our lease time for Student subnets is 5 hours.  We are
much happier with Aerohive than we were with Meru, but Aerohive is not
without their issues.  The 2 issues that are affecting us the most right now
are 1) access point crash / reboots and 2) DHCP packets being dropped on
certain model access points.  We also notice issues with the Hive Manager
Online servers being overloaded from time to time.  We will be testing a
Hive Manager on premise server soon to see if it helps.


   

Van K. Jones
Network Support Manager
Mississippi College
P: 601.925.3493 | F: 601.925.3955
 Facebook http://www.facebook.com/mississippicollege  |  Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/misscollege  |  Vimeo
http://www.vimeo.com/misscollege
 http://www.mc.edu/
 

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Tim Pierson timothy.pier...@live.com
wrote:
 
 Thanks for responding.  We have not implemented roaming and the existing staff
 felt it was not the right way to go.   I have had great success in the past
 implementing other vendor roaming products and was looking for someone who has
 the AreoHive system and would share their experience ­ good or bad.
 
  
 
 It sounds like you are an Aerohive site.  How large of population do you
 serve?  How long are you IP Leases?  Have you had any issues or concerns since
 deployed.  Is your community generally satisfied with the system?
 
  
 
 Thanks
 
  
 
 Tim
 
  
 
 From: Van Jones vjo...@mc.edu
 Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Date: Friday, October 3, 2014 at 10:22 AM
 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming
 
  
 
 Do you have layer 3 roaming enabled on your user profile(s)?  Actually, it's
 called User Profile/Optional Settings/GRE Tunnels/GRE Roaming for station
 isolation, then apply a tunnel policy.
 
 
  
 
 Van K. Jones
 Network Support Manager
 Mississippi College
 P: 601.925.3493 | F: 601.925.3955
  Facebook http://www.facebook.com/mississippicollege  |  Twitter
 http://www.twitter.com/misscollege  |  Vimeo
 http://www.vimeo.com/misscollege
  http://www.mc.edu/
  
 
 On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Tim Pierson timothy.pier...@live.com wrote:
 
  
 
 Greetings,
 
  
 
  
 
 I am looking for some input from those who have experience with Aerohive
 Wirelsss systems and who have implemented roaming across their campus.
 
  
 
 Our wireless network has been configured in such a manner that clients must
 obtain new IP space for each building as they move about campus.  Although it
 appears that Roaming is working intra-building - inter­building requires
 disconnection and re-issuing of IP at each location.  This has caused major
 issues with IP space and has the prompted the technicians to implement an
 outrageously low TTL for IP ­ 15 minutes.  We are now looking at throwing
 more IP address space at each location, but I wonder if there is a better
 way?
 
  
 
 I have experience designing and implementing CISCO¹s wireless solution and in
 that case, IP address were issued once during the day and had an eight hour
 lease.  Of course the APs' learned from each other access status, encryption
 keys or other information in cache  to maintain the session while moving from
 AP to AP.  This, I believe is the way most vendors¹ solutions have
 implemented roaming.
 
  
 
 I am getting push back on considering a campus wide roaming strategy and
 would like to know if anyone has implemented campus wide roaming in an
 environment of 10K students or more?  I would Love to hear

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming

2014-10-06 Thread Van Jones
Our DHCP problem does seem to be specific to the AP230.  All of the
Policing Rate Limits that I can find are greater than 0.  I'll dig deeper
when I get back from my next meeting.



*Van K. Jones*
Network Support Manager
Mississippi College
P: 601.925.3493 | F: 601.925.3955
 Facebook http://www.facebook.com/mississippicollege |  Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/misscollege |  Vimeo
http://www.vimeo.com/misscollege

http://www.mc.edu/

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Forrester, Matthew mforres...@berry.edu
wrote:

  Van,



 You noted that certain access points are dropping DHCP packets. We were
 experiencing the same thing with AP230’s (our only 802.11ac AP’s on
 campus).  If your issues is specific to AP230 models, I would be curious if
 your issues are caused by the same as ours was: check your in-use / default
 QoS policies and verify that a/b/g, n and ac all have values greater than 0
 Kbps for the Policing Rate limits.



 We love Aerohive, but are not huge fans of their QC when releasing new
 HiveOS (we have an on-prem hivemanager) HiveAP firmware.



 Matt Forrester

 Systems Engineer

 Berry College



 *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Van Jones
 *Sent:* Monday, October 6, 2014 11:41 AM

 *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming



 We have been a customer since 2012 (switched from Meru) and we currently
 have 345 access points across 2 campuses.  Our lease times for
 Faculty/Staff SSID is 9 hours and our lease time for Student subnets is 5
 hours.  We are much happier with Aerohive than we were with Meru, but
 Aerohive is not without their issues.  The 2 issues that are affecting us
 the most right now are 1) access point crash / reboots and 2) DHCP packets
 being dropped on certain model access points.  We also notice issues with
 the Hive Manager Online servers being overloaded from time to time.  We
 will be testing a Hive Manager on premise server soon to see if it helps.




 *Van K. Jones*
 Network Support Manager
 Mississippi College
 P: 601.925.3493 | F: 601.925.3955
  Facebook http://www.facebook.com/mississippicollege |  Twitter
 http://www.twitter.com/misscollege |  Vimeo
 http://www.vimeo.com/misscollege

 http://www.mc.edu/



 On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Tim Pierson timothy.pier...@live.com
 wrote:

  Thanks for responding.  We have not implemented roaming and the existing
 staff felt it was not the right way to go.   I have had great success in
 the past implementing other vendor roaming products and was looking for
 someone who has the AreoHive system and would share their experience – good
 or bad.



 It sounds like you are an Aerohive site.  How large of population do you
 serve?  How long are you IP Leases?  Have you had any issues or concerns
 since deployed.  Is your community generally satisfied with the system?



 Thanks



 Tim



 *From: *Van Jones vjo...@mc.edu
 *Reply-To: *The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Date: *Friday, October 3, 2014 at 10:22 AM
 *To: *WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 *Subject: *Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming



 Do you have layer 3 roaming enabled on your user profile(s)?  Actually,
 it's called User Profile/Optional Settings/GRE Tunnels/GRE Roaming for
 station isolation, then apply a tunnel policy.




 *Van K. Jones*
 Network Support Manager
 Mississippi College
 P: 601.925.3493 | F: 601.925.3955
  Facebook http://www.facebook.com/mississippicollege |  Twitter
 http://www.twitter.com/misscollege |  Vimeo
 http://www.vimeo.com/misscollege

 http://www.mc.edu/



 On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Tim Pierson timothy.pier...@live.com
 wrote:



 Greetings,





 I am looking for some input from those who have experience with Aerohive
 Wirelsss systems and who have implemented roaming across their campus.



 Our wireless network has been configured in such a manner that clients
 must obtain new IP space for each building as they move about campus.
 Although it appears that Roaming is working intra-building - inter–building
 requires disconnection and re-issuing of IP at each location.  This has
 caused major issues with IP space and has the prompted the technicians to
 implement an outrageously low TTL for IP – 15 minutes.  We are now looking
 at throwing more IP address space at each location, but I wonder if there
 is a better way?



 I have experience designing and implementing CISCO’s wireless solution and
 in that case, IP address were issued once during the day and had an eight
 hour lease.  Of course the APs' learned from each other access status,
 encryption keys or other information in cache  to maintain the session
 while moving from AP to AP.  This, I believe is the way most vendors’
 solutions have implemented roaming.



 I am getting push back on considering a campus wide roaming strategy and
 would like to know if anyone

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming

2014-10-03 Thread Van Jones
Do you have layer 3 roaming enabled on your user profile(s)?  Actually,
it's called User Profile/Optional Settings/GRE Tunnels/GRE Roaming for
station isolation, then apply a tunnel policy.



*Van K. Jones*
Network Support Manager
Mississippi College
P: 601.925.3493 | F: 601.925.3955
 Facebook http://www.facebook.com/mississippicollege |  Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/misscollege |  Vimeo
http://www.vimeo.com/misscollege

http://www.mc.edu/

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Tim Pierson timothy.pier...@live.com
wrote:


 Greetings,





 I am looking for some input from those who have experience with Aerohive
 Wirelsss systems and who have implemented roaming across their campus.



 Our wireless network has been configured in such a manner that clients
 must obtain new IP space for each building as they move about campus.
 Although it appears that Roaming is working intra-building - inter–building
 requires disconnection and re-issuing of IP at each location.  This has
 caused major issues with IP space and has the prompted the technicians to
 implement an outrageously low TTL for IP – 15 minutes.  We are now looking
 at throwing more IP address space at each location, but I wonder if there
 is a better way?



 I have experience designing and implementing CISCO’s wireless solution and
 in that case, IP address were issued once during the day and had an eight
 hour lease.  Of course the APs' learned from each other access status,
 encryption keys or other information in cache  to maintain the session
 while moving from AP to AP.  This, I believe is the way most vendors’
 solutions have implemented roaming.



 I am getting push back on considering a campus wide roaming strategy and
 would like to know if anyone has implemented campus wide roaming in an
 environment of 10K students or more?  I would Love to hear the good, the
 bad and the ugly, as what we are doing now isn’t working.



 Your input is greatly needed and appreciated.





 Thanks,



 Tim
 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



__
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:  This communication may contain confidential information. 
 
If you are not the intended recipient or if you are not authorized to receive 
it, please 
notify and return the message to the sender.   Unauthorized reviewing, 
forwarding,  
copying, distributing or using this information is strictly prohibited.


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming

2014-10-03 Thread Tim Pierson
Thanks for responding.  We have not implemented roaming and the existing
staff felt it was not the right way to go.   I have had great success in the
past implementing other vendor roaming products and was looking for someone
who has the AreoHive system and would share their experience ­ good or bad.

It sounds like you are an Aerohive site.  How large of population do you
serve?  How long are you IP Leases?  Have you had any issues or concerns
since deployed.  Is your community generally satisfied with the system?

Thanks

Tim

From:  Van Jones vjo...@mc.edu
Reply-To:  The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Date:  Friday, October 3, 2014 at 10:22 AM
To:  WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject:  Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aerohive Roaming

Do you have layer 3 roaming enabled on your user profile(s)?  Actually, it's
called User Profile/Optional Settings/GRE Tunnels/GRE Roaming for station
isolation, then apply a tunnel policy.

   
Van K. Jones
Network Support Manager
Mississippi College
P: 601.925.3493 | F: 601.925.3955
 Facebook http://www.facebook.com/mississippicollege  |  Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/misscollege  |  Vimeo
http://www.vimeo.com/misscollege
 http://www.mc.edu/

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Tim Pierson timothy.pier...@live.com
wrote:
 
 Greetings,
 
  
 
  
 
 I am looking for some input from those who have experience with Aerohive
 Wirelsss systems and who have implemented roaming across their campus.
 
  
 
 Our wireless network has been configured in such a manner that clients must
 obtain new IP space for each building as they move about campus.  Although it
 appears that Roaming is working intra-building - inter­building requires
 disconnection and re-issuing of IP at each location.  This has caused major
 issues with IP space and has the prompted the technicians to implement an
 outrageously low TTL for IP ­ 15 minutes.  We are now looking at throwing more
 IP address space at each location, but I wonder if there is a better way?
 
  
 
 I have experience designing and implementing CISCO¹s wireless solution and in
 that case, IP address were issued once during the day and had an eight hour
 lease.  Of course the APs' learned from each other access status, encryption
 keys or other information in cache  to maintain the session while moving from
 AP to AP.  This, I believe is the way most vendors¹ solutions have implemented
 roaming.
 
  
 
 I am getting push back on considering a campus wide roaming strategy and would
 like to know if anyone has implemented campus wide roaming in an environment
 of 10K students or more?  I would Love to hear the good, the bad and the ugly,
 as what we are doing now isn¹t working.
 
  
 
 Your input is greatly needed and appreciated.
 
  
 
  
 
 Thanks,
 
  
 
 Tim
 ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

__
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:  This communication may contain confidential
information.  
If you are not the intended recipient or if you are not authorized to
receive it, please 
notify and return the message to the sender.   Unauthorized reviewing,
forwarding,  
copying, distributing or using this information is strictly prohibited.


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.