Re: For Sumerian (and anyone interested) on Malaysia, Australia and the global economy. Message 2/3
Later today or maybe tomorrow, if I cannot today, I will post my last information, current value of macromagnitudes, and prediction about these two economies. I hope all this information is useful. :) Peace and best wishes. Xi On Mar 27, 1:18 pm, Sumerian.. sumerian...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks for explaining. === S1000+ === --- On Thu, 3/26/09, xi xieu.l...@gmail.com wrote: From: xi xieu.l...@gmail.com Subject: Re: For Sumerian (and anyone interested) on Malaysia, Australia and the global economy. Message 2/3 To: World-thread world-thread@googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 12:38 PM you probably can see easily that economic ties between Australia and China are harder and harder ( do you mean stronger and stronger? Yes, sorry, I meant stronger and stronger. gradually that trend will be stronger although conflicts might appear to delay those trends. I meant, that both, Malaysia and Australia, are changing and they both have to change much more within the next years and decades. Cultural, ethnic conflicts are present in both countries. That sort of conflicts become harder in transition periods like this one. I cannot predict (it is politics and I do not know about it) how those conflicts can be handled in each of those countries. To try to prevent the natural flow of events creates conflicts and delays the future, and mismanagement of such conflicts can delay it even longer and make it uncomfortable for most people. Peace and best wishes. Xi On Mar 26, 10:57 am, Sumerian.. sumerian...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi. very important message indeed.. But what did you mean by this For example, you probably can see easily that economic ties between Australia and China are harder and harder ( do you mean stronger and stronger? S1000+ PS: harder in here means difficult to achieve) , gradually that trend will be stronger although conflicts might appear to delay those trends. === S1000+ === --- On Wed, 3/25/09, Xi Ling xieu.l...@gmail.com wrote: From: Xi Ling xieu.l...@gmail.com Subject: For Sumerian (and anyone interested) on Malaysia, Australia and the global economy. Message 2/3 To: world-thread@googlegroups.com Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009, 10:35 AM In this second message of the second thread, I will try to show the different region and economic blocs using some homemade pictures. They are accurate as far as drawing ellipses allowed me that is not too much. In addition, they do not show “islands” inside blocs and regions that probably will have different features that their surrounding areas. I mean that, for example, inside a region that has a main activity commodity production might dwell a fast growing area and vice versa. Red and gray do not mean wealthy and poor; they mean fast growth and lower growth or decline. This trend will last one or two centuries, therefore red areas will become wealthier than gray areas in the long term. However, I choose that picture because individual opportunities happen easier where growth is faster, not necessarily, where wealth is already present. The reason because we can trust on this picture works lies on economic demography, and more in particular on works from prof. Paul Krugman, recent Nobel laureate in economics, for his definition on “hubs” or “monopolistic areas”. According to that works proximity and shorter distance create better conditions for related activities. Therefore, we should expect that the area where 70% of the global population dwells, and will dwell, will become the most advanced area in social end economic terms. Both for production and consumption. That area is East, Southeast and South Asia. Traditional developed areas will grow slower or even decline gradually along next few decades and centuries. This is happening already. In addition, those economic blocs are more and more a fact. I think that does not require more words. For example, you probably can see easily that economic ties between Australia and China are harder and harder, gradually that trend will be stronger although conflicts might appear to delay those trends. Peace and best wishes. Xi- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups World-thread group. To post to this group, send email to world-thread@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to world-thread+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/world-thread?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: For Sumerian (and anyone interested) on Malaysia, Australia and the global economy. Message 2/3
Hi. very important message indeed.. But what did you mean by this For example, you probably can see easily that economic ties between Australia and China are harder and harder ( do you mean stronger and stronger? S1000+ PS: harder in here means difficult to achieve) , gradually that trend will be stronger although conflicts might appear to delay those trends. === S1000+ === --- On Wed, 3/25/09, Xi Ling xieu.l...@gmail.com wrote: From: Xi Ling xieu.l...@gmail.com Subject: For Sumerian (and anyone interested) on Malaysia, Australia and the global economy. Message 2/3 To: world-thread@googlegroups.com Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009, 10:35 AM In this second message of the second thread, I will try to show the different region and economic blocs using some homemade pictures. They are accurate as far as drawing ellipses allowed me that is not too much. In addition, they do not show “islands” inside blocs and regions that probably will have different features that their surrounding areas. I mean that, for example, inside a region that has a main activity commodity production might dwell a fast growing area and vice versa. Red and gray do not mean wealthy and poor; they mean fast growth and lower growth or decline. This trend will last one or two centuries, therefore red areas will become wealthier than gray areas in the long term. However, I choose that picture because individual opportunities happen easier where growth is faster, not necessarily, where wealth is already present. The reason because we can trust on this picture works lies on economic demography, and more in particular on works from prof. Paul Krugman, recent Nobel laureate in economics, for his definition on “hubs” or “monopolistic areas”. According to that works proximity and shorter distance create better conditions for related activities. Therefore, we should expect that the area where 70% of the global population dwells, and will dwell, will become the most advanced area in social end economic terms. Both for production and consumption. That area is East, Southeast and South Asia. Traditional developed areas will grow slower or even decline gradually along next few decades and centuries. This is happening already. In addition, those economic blocs are more and more a fact. I think that does not require more words. For example, you probably can see easily that economic ties between Australia and China are harder and harder, gradually that trend will be stronger although conflicts might appear to delay those trends. Peace and best wishes. Xi --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups World-thread group. To post to this group, send email to world-thread@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to world-thread+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/world-thread?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: For Sumerian (and anyone interested) on Malaysia, Australia and the global economy. Message 2/3
you probably can see easily that economic ties between Australia and China are harder and harder ( do you mean stronger and stronger? Yes, sorry, I meant stronger and stronger. gradually that trend will be stronger although conflicts might appear to delay those trends. I meant, that both, Malaysia and Australia, are changing and they both have to change much more within the next years and decades. Cultural, ethnic conflicts are present in both countries. That sort of conflicts become harder in transition periods like this one. I cannot predict (it is politics and I do not know about it) how those conflicts can be handled in each of those countries. To try to prevent the natural flow of events creates conflicts and delays the future, and mismanagement of such conflicts can delay it even longer and make it uncomfortable for most people. Peace and best wishes. Xi On Mar 26, 10:57 am, Sumerian.. sumerian...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi. very important message indeed.. But what did you mean by this For example, you probably can see easily that economic ties between Australia and China are harder and harder ( do you mean stronger and stronger? S1000+ PS: harder in here means difficult to achieve) , gradually that trend will be stronger although conflicts might appear to delay those trends. === S1000+ === --- On Wed, 3/25/09, Xi Ling xieu.l...@gmail.com wrote: From: Xi Ling xieu.l...@gmail.com Subject: For Sumerian (and anyone interested) on Malaysia, Australia and the global economy. Message 2/3 To: world-thread@googlegroups.com Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009, 10:35 AM In this second message of the second thread, I will try to show the different region and economic blocs using some homemade pictures. They are accurate as far as drawing ellipses allowed me that is not too much. In addition, they do not show “islands” inside blocs and regions that probably will have different features that their surrounding areas. I mean that, for example, inside a region that has a main activity commodity production might dwell a fast growing area and vice versa. Red and gray do not mean wealthy and poor; they mean fast growth and lower growth or decline. This trend will last one or two centuries, therefore red areas will become wealthier than gray areas in the long term. However, I choose that picture because individual opportunities happen easier where growth is faster, not necessarily, where wealth is already present. The reason because we can trust on this picture works lies on economic demography, and more in particular on works from prof. Paul Krugman, recent Nobel laureate in economics, for his definition on “hubs” or “monopolistic areas”. According to that works proximity and shorter distance create better conditions for related activities. Therefore, we should expect that the area where 70% of the global population dwells, and will dwell, will become the most advanced area in social end economic terms. Both for production and consumption. That area is East, Southeast and South Asia. Traditional developed areas will grow slower or even decline gradually along next few decades and centuries. This is happening already. In addition, those economic blocs are more and more a fact. I think that does not require more words. For example, you probably can see easily that economic ties between Australia and China are harder and harder, gradually that trend will be stronger although conflicts might appear to delay those trends. Peace and best wishes. Xi --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups World-thread group. To post to this group, send email to world-thread@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to world-thread+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/world-thread?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
